I have said it before and I will say it again that until we include in the right to bear arms using the 9th and the 10th Amendments Facial or as applied challenges against these States to bolster the 2nd Amendment Rights we will continue to weeken it with new sliding scales placed by unconstitutional rulings by a judiciary who continue to make decisions that far exceed their limited powers. These are all violations to the Shall not be infringed portion of the 2nd. PLEASE INCORPORATE BOTH THE 9TH & 10TH AMENDMENTS IN DEFENSE OF THE 2ND...
The only conceal weapon permit that was any good was GA. Because they fill out the paperwork. But never turn it in. It was a one time background check to buy as much as you want. Without a bunch of wait times. But I agree that all these anticonceal carry bs needs to go.
@@ArmedScholar Has anyone thought to add 9th and 10th amendment as applied or facial challenges to bolster the 2nd Amendment Right. It seems to me many of these cases are missing these arguments and we don't get a better robust argument defense against the unconstitutional infringement of each of these Amendments. The problem is that all most all fail to think outside the 2nd Amendment implications of these rulings. We are losing more than simply 2nd Amendment Rights on these issues we are losing our Unenumerated rights with every limitation the judiciary adds with rulings that never even considered the implications of the effects these have on The People's 9th and 10th Amendment Rights. To understand how our 10th Amendment Rights are implicated one must understand what the word OR means in the 10th Amendment...
@@DanK123what part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard for people to understand. As well as the fact that the constitution is a restriction on what government can and can't do, not a restriction on us "the people".
One could argue, and win actually, that they could ban concealed carry so long as they do not ban open carry.... Since there is no ban on open carry, then there is no infringement to the second amendment... Aymette V State... Banning magazines, for another example, is not an infringement on the second amendment either... Neither is banning suppressors, or bump stocks..... for that matter.... If there was no limit to the second amendment, the phrase "Shall not be infringed" would have never made it into the constitution... in fact, the Second amendment is the only one that says that.... To prove a law is unconstitutional, you must first prove that it is actually infringing on a the constitution... and banning concealed carry, so long as it does not ban open carry, does not violate the second amendment at all... There your "ALL restrictive Laws are infringements" has been proven false...
We live in California and it was comforting to know most people in our communty were carrying at the kids soccer ⚽️ games today at the park while the Sheriff Department was hunting down some criminal in the next town over than ran from them and shot at them... keeping children SAFE is the whole reason people CCW in California... So ya, legal carry in parks MUST continue (it will no matter what 😉 )
Keep it up never give up your rights i by tge grace of god live in guntucky here open carry is an absolute right public places like parks that are not off limits by state law can restrict concealed carry but must allow open carry we allow both in the state without a permit most places
@matthewlee9728 We can carry in parks here in California... we did this today, and it happens daily... the whole park thing is being challenged in court and either way nobody will obey it, nkr will it ever be enforced..., but current CA CCW allows for carry in parks
Imagine if you needed a permit to speak your mind. Ridiculous? Yes it is, no more than any other right the government “permits”. Anyone that works in government should be required to read and explain the constitution. If they can’t, no job.
Effectively, you do need a permit to speak your mind. Everything online is attached to your identity, and if you say something someone doesn't want you to say, you'll never get more than about 6 likes. This is even more controlled than radio and TV were. At this point, they already have not only a file, but an AI model that already knows what you're doing, thinking, and going to do or say next.
The USSC has had 235 years to get the 2nd Amendment right. They collectively have failed and should be ashamed of themselves. My God, high school kids could have figured it out by 1790.
The SC has been known to change their decision over the years. Just as they did on that abortion case. In my opinion any decision by the SC should be at least a 8 to one vote instead of a simple majority. I would say all 9 but in any group of people there is often one hold out.
The most ironic part is how SCOTUS “interprets” the Constitution. They are suppose to interpret whether laws violate the Constitution, not the Constitution itself. Imagine the Founders allowing the very government they created the Bill of Rights for to “interpret” it…it literally makes zero sense. The same with the whole “well regulated” argument or somehow people try to argue all the rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights are individual rights, except for the 2A…
No failure by the court; there was never a question prior to about 1925; then it was private ownership of full-auto weapons only, due to the gangs having more and better weapons than the police. The current idiocy did not start up until the 1960's when bleeding hearts started wailing about life in prison over a moment's bad judgement being cruel. Perhaps, just perhaps, life in prison should mean you leave feet first and the death penalty should mean in the next 18 months, not 35 years from now. Seems as though "redefining" the Constitution and bill of rights has badly muddied the waters. Here is a bit of clarity-YOUR RIGHTS END; WHERE MINE BEGIN!
@@Changemymind1 But the whole point behind CCW is to be able to use it if you need to. If you use a CCW fire arm in a band area you will be prosecuted by the state for having your fire arm where they say is illegal
It's time for states like California to stop limiting self-defense and recognize that responsible gun owners shouldn't be restricted by arbitrary laws.
@AllAboutSurvival we are in CA and the CCW laws are some of the best. Even "no guns allowed" signs have no effect here... SB2 was a reaction to Bruen which basically said LA and SF need to missus CCW too.... obviously those areas refuse to control their criminal population so Bruen freaked them out... but every where else in CA ignores SB2
Being in Washington State and having stricter laws than Cali makes me sick to my stomach. The fact it's gotten this bad overall is ridiculous, and unfortunately, I don't see anything getting better anytime soon.
I don't think Wa is worse than Cali. I moved out of there because it sucks anywhere on the left coast, but I had a class C felony in WA. I easily got my firearms right restored after only a 5-year limit on my rights. Could even conceal carry. Moved to MI. and I could by weapons but denied my conceal carry permit. I'm now getting my felony vacated in order to get my permit. So stupid!
That's because you don't have a clue of what's going on and what's being done. Every gun law is going bye bye. This is prepping you clueless folks to prepare you so it's not an actual shock
AND the parking lot. That's especially problematic! Even -if- someone doesn't bring their weapon in, screw you anyway because this effectively disarms you everywhere because you can't even "comply" by locking it in your vehicle and leaving it outside.
Exactly. Because of that part, the 4 different grocery stores I go to would now be off limits because each one has an alcohol serving restaurant.i didn't see in the ruling how they'll get criminals to not carry in these parking lots or parks.🤔
Years ago I went with my family to Disney. No guns are allowed in the parking lot.. 🤔 but they don't do a vehicle search. So, How they going to know? I wouldnt say nothing, and Lock it in a box inside the locked car. A Disney employee on the other hand had to have said something.. he got fired for having a gun locked in the vehicle. Last I heard he was taking it to court.
The permit issue is discrimination at its best. The Supreme Court needs to strike down these an institute the rule of carry across the board for all States and possessions. If the states then feel the need for training provide it.
@@choppsticc One term. When this is in full swing things will change. Vote, get a receipt and a purple thumb. Outlaw duel citizenship in congress. If you can't get to the polls, eff U. It's not discrimination. It's common sense. Who are these sensitive touchy feely employees that call names? Eff them too. Our founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.
Any time a ban hinders or prevent (infringe) the citizens from keeping and bearing arms it is Unconstitutional. the 2nd Amendment has precedence over any and all laws they pass. “Shall (mandatory) not infringe has precedence over all gun bans.
I greatly appreciate this discussion and those involved as plaintiff and scholar. Goodness knows we need these efforts. I do wish the transcripts were accurate, and the presentation perhaps a bit more succinct. The transcript note regarding the bong panel was hilarious and perhaps pertinent in some cases. Lol Keep up the good work.
Ty boss! It's patriots like you that keep family fun target practice and the need to protect our families an ABILITY AND RIGHT to do so Prayers for you and your loved ones. Keep up the GOOD FIGHT (the fight that SHOULDN'T EVEN BE HAPPENING SINCE WE HAVE THE "CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES " ... which gives AMERICANS the right to keep and bare arms... that was standard knowledge taught to us in school as a VERY IMPORTANT HISTORICAL DOCUMENT, LAW, FACT, STANDARD, ET. ETC ETC THAT IT IS... now they barely talk about AMERICA AS AMERICANS, and who/what they are)... IN OUR TIME.... Nowadays, ...kids are clueless (My 8yr son, ONLY CHILD... is taught everything he should be, CARES ABOUT IT, ...and hopes more of his class mates... or ones soon after him, GET A GRIP ON REALITY.... AND STOP TIEING UP THE COURT WITH ANTI-AMERICA and DICTATORSHIP FOCUSED, ....LOSSED MINDED INDIVIDUALS... ..AND GET OVER THERE SINSITIVE FEELINGS ABOUT THE 2A... from today.. TO WHATEVER MODERN YEAR TTHIS EARTH MAKES IT TO... and NOTHING SHORT OF TY AGAIN
Mahalo (Thankyou in Hawaiian) for your coverage. Far too many attempts to disenable those who seek to obey laws to protect themselves and others. And too much enabling those criminals by making committing crimes safer for them to commit.
I do not need ,nor do I seek permission from an authority to engage in a right given to me by God and secured by the constitution!!!! Why is this simple and bullet argument never brought up ?
😂 You're right and wrong. It's like getting anal sex on your first date with a nice girl. It would be great if 2A would revert to original interpretation. We have been lacking the balls since the 1800s
And one of the cases they found is over a century BEFORE our founding so that does not fit into what is even remotely acceptable not to mention all three were not even remotely close in comparison.
Concealed carry means Conceal your gon so it can't be seen. If it can't be seen nobody knows you have it. So unless you have to walk through a detector or get patted down. What's the BFD ?
When it comes to bars, where people often become inebriated I can somewhat see the point. Alcohol and other forms of intoxication can alter an individuals thought processes. BUT there are no exceptions in the constitution and constitutional amendments.
I live in Colorado where there is no restrictions for concealed carry in bars. But it IS illegal to carry while intoxicated, which could mean having even one drink. So, again, it requires a law-abiding, conscientious citizen.
Except that Historically Saloons were a common area to carry! And since school shootings are common today, it is definitely a location that should be Allowed to CCW. Same with Banks!
I strongly believe in our Constitutional Right!. There should be legal guidelines to do so. Should be Permits & firearms training. It is about the Law and the Safety for Law Enforcement and We The American People 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Constitutional right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! Any government regulations, required permits, or laws are unconstitutional. The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Any action taken by the federal/state government is unconditional & void by the constitution
@@bobsimpson7451that's because it's a constitutional right for the citizens of our Constitutional Republic. If you're not a citizen you don't have any of those constitutional rights
Only the safety of LEOs?? Then we need LEO Control!!!!! Have you seen all tlof the bad acts that LEOs do? Such as a false arrest, family files lawsuit then the PD starts to investigate and harass that family on such a blatant level that Institute for Kustice gets involved over the retaliation.
If Hawaii was a Foreign Country during the time period described in Bruen why are Hawaiian laws even considered in the court decisions ? Weren't laws from England already deemed inappropriate for consideration ?
![[Full] 4 ต่อ 4 Celebrity EP.922 | 10 พ.ย. 67 | one31](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zmV5HRIxIBI/mqdefault.jpg)
Support the channel by checking out our new sponsor Brownells, also use code scholar10!
In other news, it looks like the class action regarding the California CCW data breach has settled.
I have said it before and I will say it again that until we include in the right to bear arms using the 9th and the 10th Amendments Facial or as applied challenges against these States to bolster the 2nd Amendment Rights we will continue to weeken it with new sliding scales placed by unconstitutional rulings by a judiciary who continue to make decisions that far exceed their limited powers. These are all violations to the Shall not be infringed portion of the 2nd. PLEASE INCORPORATE BOTH THE 9TH & 10TH AMENDMENTS IN DEFENSE OF THE 2ND...
I'm s
I'm
The only conceal weapon permit that was any good was GA. Because they fill out the paperwork. But never turn it in. It was a one time background check to buy as much as you want. Without a bunch of wait times.
But I agree that all these anticonceal carry bs needs to go.
@@ArmedScholar Has anyone thought to add 9th and 10th amendment as applied or facial challenges to bolster the 2nd Amendment Right. It seems to me many of these cases are missing these arguments and we don't get a better robust argument defense against the unconstitutional infringement of each of these Amendments. The problem is that all most all fail to think outside the 2nd Amendment implications of these rulings. We are losing more than simply 2nd Amendment Rights on these issues we are losing our Unenumerated rights with every limitation the judiciary adds with rulings that never even considered the implications of the effects these have on The People's 9th and 10th Amendment Rights. To understand how our 10th Amendment Rights are implicated one must understand what the word OR means in the 10th Amendment...
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!
PERIOD.
AMEN
Calm down Frances
Banning concealed carry is not an infringement, so long as they do not ban open carry...
@@ThePatriotSledgehammerdude banning any form of carry is infringement
@@societyisboring no it is not… lol
Any time a ban hinders or prevent (infringe) the citizens from keeping and bearing arms it is Unconstitutional.
Do you see anyone doing anything about it? Nope.
@@whisper8742
Well, a lot of people seem to be filing challenges through the courts, so, yes, someone is trying to do something. What are you doing?
Yawn
ALL restrictive firearms Laws are infringements.
Period
Are they though?
@@DanK123 they are
@@DanK123what part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard for people to understand. As well as the fact that the constitution is a restriction on what government can and can't do, not a restriction on us "the people".
Thank you, some of us understand 😌
One could argue, and win actually, that they could ban concealed carry so long as they do not ban open carry....
Since there is no ban on open carry, then there is no infringement to the second amendment... Aymette V State...
Banning magazines, for another example, is not an infringement on the second amendment either... Neither is banning suppressors, or bump stocks..... for that matter....
If there was no limit to the second amendment, the phrase "Shall not be infringed" would have never made it into the constitution... in fact, the Second amendment is the only one that says that....
To prove a law is unconstitutional, you must first prove that it is actually infringing on a the constitution... and banning concealed carry, so long as it does not ban open carry, does not violate the second amendment at all...
There your "ALL restrictive Laws are infringements" has been proven false...
We live in California and it was comforting to know most people in our communty were carrying at the kids soccer ⚽️ games today at the park while the Sheriff Department was hunting down some criminal in the next town over than ran from them and shot at them... keeping children SAFE is the whole reason people CCW in California... So ya, legal carry in parks MUST continue (it will no matter what 😉 )
Keep it up never give up your rights i by tge grace of god live in guntucky here open carry is an absolute right public places like parks that are not off limits by state law can restrict concealed carry but must allow open carry we allow both in the state without a permit most places
@matthewlee9728 We can carry in parks here in California... we did this today, and it happens daily... the whole park thing is being challenged in court and either way nobody will obey it, nkr will it ever be enforced..., but current CA CCW allows for carry in parks
AMEN
@@LexusGX460-OFF-ROAD Better to be arrested for self defense than lose a child.
@@LexusGX460-OFF-ROAD That's good, you must protect the kids!
If my second amendment right is not welcomed at those locations then my tax dollars shouldn't either...who do I talk to stop payment?
Umm....that's not how it works
@@DanK123it should though.
@@DanK123"um actually... ☝🏼🤓"
@@DanK123because people let it happen.
@@DanK123than let's make it work
Second Amendment is guaranteed by the Constitution!
Imagine if you needed a permit to speak your mind. Ridiculous? Yes it is, no more than any other right the government “permits”.
Anyone that works in government should be required to read and explain the constitution. If they can’t, no job.
Just wait, Kamala wants to pass hate speech laws. So jail time for offending someone
Well you ever heard of the thought police in the UK/Europe?
4 sure. Thank you patriot
Effectively, you do need a permit to speak your mind. Everything online is attached to your identity, and if you say something someone doesn't want you to say, you'll never get more than about 6 likes. This is even more controlled than radio and TV were. At this point, they already have not only a file, but an AI model that already knows what you're doing, thinking, and going to do or say next.
@@-taz- most peaceful protests are planned require permits to use said area, that in itself sounds like a major violation of the constitution
The USSC has had 235 years to get the 2nd Amendment right. They collectively have failed and should be ashamed of themselves. My God, high school kids could have figured it out by 1790.
The
SC has been known to change their decision over the years. Just as they did on that abortion case. In my opinion any decision by the SC should be at least a 8 to one vote instead of a simple majority. I would say all 9 but in any group of people there is often one hold out.
The most ironic part is how SCOTUS “interprets” the Constitution. They are suppose to interpret whether laws violate the Constitution, not the Constitution itself. Imagine the Founders allowing the very government they created the Bill of Rights for to “interpret” it…it literally makes zero sense. The same with the whole “well regulated” argument or somehow people try to argue all the rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights are individual rights, except for the 2A…
@@ralphmowery28988-1 requirement would be stupid. The court would take on even fewer controversial cases.
No failure by the court; there was never a question prior to about 1925; then it was private ownership of full-auto weapons only, due to the gangs having more and better weapons than the police.
The current idiocy did not start up until the 1960's when bleeding hearts started wailing about life in prison over a moment's bad judgement being cruel. Perhaps, just perhaps, life in prison should mean you leave feet first and the death penalty should mean in the next 18 months, not 35 years from now. Seems as though "redefining" the Constitution and bill of rights has badly muddied the waters.
Here is a bit of clarity-YOUR RIGHTS END; WHERE MINE BEGIN!
I disagree. The second amendment is most poorly worded sentence in the constitution.
So any criminal can walk onto a playground and do whatever they want, because honest armed citizens cannot be there ,armed.
Free citizens follow the Constitution.
If it’s properly concealed, no one should know
@senderoverland true, but who's going to get prosecuted? The honest citizen.
@@senderoverlandUnless your 4th is violated which we see everyday now.
@@Changemymind1 But the whole point behind CCW is to be able to use it if you need to. If you use a CCW fire arm in a band area you will be prosecuted by the state for having your fire arm where they say is illegal
Thank you for all your work informing us on the fight for our rights.
Like ive been saying for years. The ball keeps being thrown over the fence. Nothing is changing.
It's time for states like California to stop limiting self-defense and recognize that responsible gun owners shouldn't be restricted by arbitrary laws.
When politicians come for our 1A or 2A, they get 2A.
So simple.
@AllAboutSurvival we are in CA and the CCW laws are some of the best. Even "no guns allowed" signs have no effect here... SB2 was a reaction to Bruen which basically said LA and SF need to missus CCW too.... obviously those areas refuse to control their criminal population so Bruen freaked them out... but every where else in CA ignores SB2
Leash laws have no limiting effect on the activities of wolves.
@@LexusGX460-OFF-ROAD Good on you guys for carrying anyway, it's your 2A right!
@@adirondacker007best comment I’ve read.
Thank you for the update.
Being in Washington State and having stricter laws than Cali makes me sick to my stomach. The fact it's gotten this bad overall is ridiculous, and unfortunately, I don't see anything getting better anytime soon.
I don't think Wa is worse than Cali. I moved out of there because it sucks anywhere on the left coast, but I had a class C felony in WA. I easily got my firearms right restored after only a 5-year limit on my rights. Could even conceal carry. Moved to MI. and I could by weapons but denied my conceal carry permit. I'm now getting my felony vacated in order to get my permit. So stupid!
That's because you don't have a clue of what's going on and what's being done.
Every gun law is going bye bye.
This is prepping you clueless folks to prepare you so it's not an actual shock
as long as Ferguson loses we should be okay. i hope so at least...
@mikew8622 But in Cali you can still get an AR. That's now apparently illegal in WA...."assault weapon" BS.
@@Valgard09 you think all this is really happening huh.
Ask p diddy what's really going on
Thanks for the update Anthony!
I’m confused you say they’re trying to get rid of permits nationwide but provide no information on that topic
Every time, I thought I was the only one that notices it.
Thanks! Your awesome, love the plain English explanation.
🇺🇸👍
Thank you Anthony. I do not understand why shall not be infringed is so complicated.
My vehicle in a public access parking lot is still my private property. But it’s California, so they hate 2A
Thank you for keeping us informed!
Thank you for this 2A update.
They need to be held accountable!
Another informative no nonsense video. Well done, Sir. Thank you
Great Report. Thank You. AS
Thanks Brownells!!
Thank you for this video. Great explanation!
The people must form a constitutional Militia and force change
Best review of the present situation regarding these two lawsuits. Keep it up!
Happen to just pull up my studio and there I see the OG & big brother Sam Paredes! Thank you!
Keep on Keeping on! 🎉
Never will stop!
Complaining?? Or not standing??
@@golfnb28 please show your list of accomplishments
@deannashaughnessy8160 why don't you look at your own list and stop asking for others.
AND the parking lot. That's especially problematic! Even -if- someone doesn't bring their weapon in, screw you anyway because this effectively disarms you everywhere because you can't even "comply" by locking it in your vehicle and leaving it outside.
Exactly. Because of that part, the 4 different grocery stores I go to would now be off limits because each one has an alcohol serving restaurant.i didn't see in the ruling how they'll get criminals to not carry in these parking lots or parks.🤔
What they don't know... may not hurt.
🤐
Years ago I went with my family to Disney. No guns are allowed in the parking lot.. 🤔 but they don't do a vehicle search.
So, How they going to know?
I wouldnt say nothing, and Lock it in a box inside the locked car.
A Disney employee on the other hand had to have said something.. he got fired for having a gun locked in the vehicle. Last I heard he was taking it to court.
Thanks again for these important updates.
Great info as always!!
Go out and Vote Red Gun Owners Thank You America 🇺🇸 🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️🤍💙
State the main point first, then have people stay for the details. Many will stay.
Thanks again
The permit issue is discrimination at its best. The Supreme Court needs to strike down these an institute the rule of carry across the board for all States and possessions. If the states then feel the need for training provide it.
Provide it on our dime???
@@golfnb28take it out of their budgets.
@choppsticc Their budget is still on our dime, and allows them to discriminate further by making training difficult to obtain.
@@choppsticctheir budgets are our money
@@choppsticc One term. When this is in full swing things will change. Vote, get a receipt and a purple thumb. Outlaw duel citizenship in congress. If you can't get to the polls, eff U. It's not discrimination. It's common sense. Who are these sensitive touchy feely employees that call names? Eff them too. Our founding fathers are rolling over in their graves.
Thanks Anthony
Excellent analysis
Any time a ban hinders or prevent (infringe) the citizens from keeping and bearing arms it is Unconstitutional.
the 2nd Amendment has precedence over any and all laws they pass. “Shall (mandatory) not infringe has precedence over all gun bans.
Great show🎉
Thank you
Good info!
I greatly appreciate this discussion and those involved as plaintiff and scholar. Goodness knows we need these efforts. I do wish the transcripts were accurate, and the presentation perhaps a bit more succinct. The transcript note regarding the bong panel was hilarious and perhaps pertinent in some cases. Lol
Keep up the good work.
Thanks
Thanks for watching!
Our founding fathers would be proud of your work. Thank you
Work?
@@PeasantKing-od5lg it is work to do these video's a lot of work. 😊
Thanks!
Thank you for the Super Thanks!
Even the Justices understand we need to protect ourselves! Damn.
Im confused, are we on the road to get rid of permits?
Is this good or bad?
Possibly.
But in my state, I'll keep my permit. So I can buy guns an take it home the same day.
Hello Al
The news coming out everyday from these channels are like whiplash back and forth.
Tax stamp is that still in forced I remember you did a video about that was curious about it. I truly appreciate your channel!! 👍
Tnanks
Appreciate your info! Salute!! Realistically there is no end to these lawsuits that impact our 2nd amendment rights! CORRECT??
Looks like we're ready for a change in the court system that can.
Defend, our rights are first to and second amendment.
Ty boss! It's patriots like you that keep family fun target practice and the need to protect our families an ABILITY AND RIGHT to do so
Prayers for you and your loved ones.
Keep up the GOOD FIGHT (the fight that SHOULDN'T EVEN BE HAPPENING SINCE WE HAVE THE "CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES "
...
which gives AMERICANS the right to keep and bare arms...
that was standard knowledge taught to us in school as a VERY IMPORTANT HISTORICAL DOCUMENT, LAW, FACT, STANDARD, ET. ETC ETC THAT IT IS... now they barely talk about AMERICA AS AMERICANS, and who/what they are)... IN OUR TIME....
Nowadays, ...kids are clueless
(My 8yr son, ONLY CHILD... is taught everything he should be, CARES ABOUT IT, ...and hopes more of his class mates... or ones soon after him, GET A GRIP ON REALITY....
AND STOP TIEING UP THE COURT WITH ANTI-AMERICA and DICTATORSHIP FOCUSED, ....LOSSED MINDED INDIVIDUALS...
..AND GET OVER THERE SINSITIVE FEELINGS ABOUT THE 2A...
from today..
TO WHATEVER MODERN YEAR TTHIS EARTH MAKES IT TO... and NOTHING SHORT OF
TY AGAIN
😭 just lmk when rules and cases are finalized, no appeals. I be happy, ready to exercise and then boom more court dates
Mahalo (Thankyou in Hawaiian) for your coverage. Far too many attempts to disenable those who seek to obey laws to protect themselves and others. And too much enabling those criminals by making committing crimes safer for them to commit.
Need to start dealing with these judges, politicians, and states that keep going against the SCOTUS decision.
Awesome!
Delay…Delay and Delay. They will drag this out for as long as they can.
That's why these lawyers should stoo fighting on the injunctions and just go to the merits fight
Thank you...👏👏BRAVO....👍👍🙏
I do not need ,nor do I seek permission from an authority to engage in a right given to me by God and secured by the constitution!!!! Why is this simple and bullet argument never brought up ?
😂
You're right and wrong.
It's like getting anal sex on your first date with a nice girl.
It would be great if 2A would revert to original interpretation.
We have been lacking the balls since the 1800s
...and it's stated in plain language in the U.S.Constitution that was written long before California or Hawaii became states!
Your legal theory sucks!🤣
Can you include a TLDR in your videos? They're awesome and super informative, but hard to follow through the entire video.
I have been using Brownell's since 2005!
Gosh I really enjoy this channel I just wish I could understand it well enough to be able to not need my lawyer to interpret it for me.
Yes
Support
Better hope Trump wins, 2nd & 4th amendments
You have a short memory.
He banned bump stocks and rallied for red flag laws. After what's happened to him I guarantee he'll come down even more on our 2A rights.
Fuel
2A.
Good job. Just bought something from Brownell’s.
It's never ending.
Love Brownells
You da man!!
⛽✈ I remain cautiously optimistic
⛽🚀
Why the hell are there commercials with B.O. on a place like this!🤮🤮🤮
Protect our 2A America 🇺🇸
THEN USE YOUR 2A AGAINST THE POLITICIANS INFRINGING IT.
DO YOU GET IT YET??????????????????????????????????????
@@divinecommerce3912 protect our Constitutions
And one of the cases they found is over a century BEFORE our founding so that does not fit into what is even remotely acceptable not to mention all three were not even remotely close in comparison.
What about public schools and colleges? Is anyone challenging it rights to protect ourselves there?
So under this ridiculous decision What happens if a gun shop that offers ccw classes share's a parking lot with a restaurant that also sell alcohol?
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Any NY updates?
cliff notes: the SCOTUS keeps kicking the can down the road for somebody else to deal with.....
Concealed carry means Conceal your gon so it can't be seen. If it can't be seen nobody knows you have it. So unless you have to walk through a detector or get patted down. What's the BFD ?
Florida is totally opposite lol we have permitless concealed carry, but open carry ban, and California has open carry but no conceal.
When it comes to bars, where people often become inebriated I can somewhat see the point. Alcohol and other forms of intoxication can alter an individuals thought processes. BUT there are no exceptions in the constitution and constitutional amendments.
I live in Colorado where there is no restrictions for concealed carry in bars. But it IS illegal to carry while intoxicated, which could mean having even one drink. So, again, it requires a law-abiding, conscientious citizen.
Except that Historically Saloons were a common area to carry! And since school shootings are common today, it is definitely a location that should be Allowed to CCW. Same with Banks!
If everyone carried in Banks, I bet there would be far fewer robberies! As is now, it's a goldmine with little protection!
I strongly believe in our Constitutional Right!. There should be legal guidelines to do so. Should be Permits & firearms training. It is about the Law and the Safety for Law Enforcement and We The American People 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Constitutional right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED! Any government regulations, required permits, or laws are unconstitutional. The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Any action taken by the federal/state government is unconditional & void by the constitution
@@rjp2830 not everybody has the Legal Right or should own a Firearm.
@@bobsimpson7451that's because it's a constitutional right for the citizens of our Constitutional Republic. If you're not a citizen you don't have any of those constitutional rights
Only the safety of LEOs?? Then we need LEO Control!!!!! Have you seen all tlof the bad acts that LEOs do? Such as a false arrest, family files lawsuit then the PD starts to investigate and harass that family on such a blatant level that Institute for Kustice gets involved over the retaliation.
Congratulations on BROWNELLS sponsorship
Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void, period. Don't comply or bow down under these infringements.
Can I get a TLDR? lol.
How is this possible, the SC is not in session.
"A Constitutional Republic, If we can keep it"
Its September 25, 2024 at 2:42pm. I have a CCW. WHERE AND WHEN CAN I CARRY RIGHT NOW???????????
I need to get reimbursed for all the money I spent on my application process in NYS
If Hawaii was a Foreign Country during the time period described in Bruen why are Hawaiian laws even considered in the court decisions ?
Weren't laws from England already deemed inappropriate for consideration ?
It’s not a 50/50 bargain!
since the 9th circuit ruled the non violent gun ban unconstitutional, is that nationwide now? how does that work?
I live near brownells