@@Aiel-Necromancer Just give up and stop arguing with the voices in your head while projecting them onto me. Literally everything you wrote there is wrong.
If someone at Google sees this, please forward to the guys in the booth: Show the freakin slides already! It sucks to have to pause and take screen shots. We know what the guy looks like. He doesn't morph. Next time there's a talk take note of where all the eyeballs are pointed 90 percent of the time.
Among other things, the speaker's body language indicates when the slides should be focused on. When he points his pointer at the slide, for example, or when he turns away from the camera to look at the slide. 🤦♂️
Shame he doesn't talk much about the systemic incentive structure of state-funded science. Papers are submitted to get published in the most prestigious journals. That's it. It does not have to provide a useful product nor be truthful.
20:45 a "chance finding" that "goes away" with more tests is exactly the same thing as a regression to the mean. Not sure why the professor felt the need to pretend otherwise... They was a strange interaction
this is the 3rd video i've watch of Ioannidis - but i've had to give up part way - he has valuable information for everyone - but talks to researchers - not to laymen - i need a good dumbing down version
In a few words. With capitalism you incentivize and force the most brilliant minds on this planet to give results that oligarchy (hedge funds) can exploit for MONEY slowing down global progress.
@@aristeidisaldroupitsouliag7417 - asked for it to be dumbed down - not made stupid - check with Hans Rsoling regarding the speed of global progress - and consider what could have been achieved without the socialists trying to drag the cart backwards
Marxists believe that economic and social conditions, and especially the class relations that derive from them, affect every aspect of an individual's life, from religious beliefs to legal systems to cultural frameworks. From one classic Marxist point of view, the role of art is not only to represent such conditions truthfully, but also to seek to improve them (social/socialist realism); however, this is a contentious interpretation of the limited but significant writing by Marx and Engels on art and especially on aesthetics.
Probably it would be fair to say that two of the most influential writings in Marxist aesthetics in recent times, and apart from Marx himself and Lukacs, have been Walter Benjamin's essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, and Herbert Marcuse's One-Dimensional Man. Louis Althusser has also contributed some small but significant essays on art and his theory of ideology also impacts in this area ("Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses").
For all their differences, there is one key aspect of the intellectual history charted in "Conservatives Against Capitalism" that deals with an issue of shared concern on both the left and the right: the need for community. One of the grim consequences of the Social Darwinian pressures unleashed by free-market capitalism has been the destruction of networks of community, family, and professional associations in developed societies. ... These so-called intermediate institutions have historically played a vital role giving ordinary people a sense of meaning and protecting them from the structural violence of the state and the market. Their loss has led to the creation of a huge class of atomized and lonely people, cut adrift from traditional sources of support and left alone to contend with the power of impersonal economic forces.
This guy is such a clear thinker. Wonderful talk.
Great presentation. Dr. Ioannidis is a very engaging speaker.
Amazing mind. He can help us with covid19. You will think twice before relying on a single scientific study.
Ioannidis should get a Nobel.
He is probably not too welcomed in that crowd.
He deconstructs, that’s the pb.
Nobel prize winners represent probably less than 5% of all the studies published.
Ioannidis blows away the 95%.
@@Aiel-Necromancer Who said that they were?
@@Aiel-Necromancer Just give up and stop arguing with the voices in your head while projecting them onto me.
Literally everything you wrote there is wrong.
Perhaps a requirement for graduation should be to replicate a published study and publish the new results.
If someone at Google sees this, please forward to the guys in the booth: Show the freakin slides already! It sucks to have to pause and take screen shots. We know what the guy looks like. He doesn't morph. Next time there's a talk take note of where all the eyeballs are pointed 90 percent of the time.
If someone see the people watching this for free: remind them that it was FREE.
😂
@@georgechristiansen6785 It doesn't hurt to ask. I think the easiest would just see if they could provide a download link for the slides.
I like seeing him speak. Just slides is boring.
Among other things, the speaker's body language indicates when the slides should be focused on. When he points his pointer at the slide, for example, or when he turns away from the camera to look at the slide. 🤦♂️
Shame he doesn't talk much about the systemic incentive structure of state-funded science. Papers are submitted to get published in the most prestigious journals. That's it. It does not have to provide a useful product nor be truthful.
What about the role of government funding in research?
This guys p-value totally has statistical significance!
Amazing talk. Also for 12:00 it could be that people get medication first for some inconvenience which later is found out to be cancer.
20:45 a "chance finding" that "goes away" with more tests is exactly the same thing as a regression to the mean. Not sure why the professor felt the need to pretend otherwise... They was a strange interaction
What about crisis in terms of being tools for funding and political policies?
Wish they would supply the files used in a link.
so who tried to replicate this guys body of work?
I am speaking to medical students that we currently have a kind of owerproduction of scientiffic papers.
fascinatory. simply fascinatious
Maybe we're using the wrong paradigm? If that were the case, no wonder we're going in circles, fluctuating about a mean.
this is really interesting.
How does this apply to climate “science”?
So google is true?
this is the 3rd video i've watch of Ioannidis - but i've had to give up part way - he has valuable information for everyone - but talks to researchers - not to laymen - i need a good dumbing down version
In a few words. With capitalism you incentivize and force the most brilliant minds on this planet to give results that oligarchy (hedge funds) can exploit for MONEY slowing down global progress.
@@aristeidisaldroupitsouliag7417 - asked for it to be dumbed down - not made stupid - check with Hans Rsoling regarding the speed of global progress - and consider what could have been achieved without the socialists trying to drag the cart backwards
Marxists believe that economic and social conditions, and especially the class relations that derive from them, affect every aspect of an individual's life, from religious beliefs to legal systems to cultural frameworks. From one classic Marxist point of view, the role of art is not only to represent such conditions truthfully, but also to seek to improve them (social/socialist realism); however, this is a contentious interpretation of the limited but significant writing by Marx and Engels on art and especially on aesthetics.
Probably it would be fair to say that two of the most influential writings in Marxist aesthetics in recent times, and apart from Marx himself and Lukacs, have been Walter Benjamin's essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, and Herbert Marcuse's One-Dimensional Man. Louis Althusser has also contributed some small but significant essays on art and his theory of ideology also impacts in this area ("Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses").
For all their differences, there is one key aspect of the intellectual history charted in "Conservatives Against Capitalism" that deals with an issue of shared concern on both the left and the right: the need for community. One of the grim consequences of the Social Darwinian pressures unleashed by free-market capitalism has been the destruction of networks of community, family, and professional associations in developed societies. ... These so-called intermediate institutions have historically played a vital role giving ordinary people a sense of meaning and protecting them from the structural violence of the state and the market. Their loss has led to the creation of a huge class of atomized and lonely people, cut adrift from traditional sources of support and left alone to contend with the power of impersonal economic forces.
STOP TOUCHING YOUR FACE! 😷
@SneekySnek This was obviously a joke. There even was a smiley just in case some humourless douche would miss it!