Thank you for the very helpful comparison video. LS3/5A sounds the most natural to me. TAD and B&W seem to be good at expressing details, but B&W doesn't have good transitions in the mid-high range, giving it a mechanical feel. TAD is also clear, but I feel a resonance-like sound in the midrange. The sound of the LS3/5A has a smoother transition from the midrange to the high range, and perhaps because of the compact, closed design, there is less resonance from the box, allowing me to immerse myself in the music. I think it's amazing considering the price difference.
Le meilleur et le plus réaliste est le Tad ME1, ensuite vient le Kef R et puis loin derrière le Kef ls3/5A et le N&B qui ne vaut certainement pas le prix demandé !!!
I do not understand why you would even put the LS3/5A in this test, to me its clearly much outclassed by the other speakers, the other speakers are high end and transparent to varying degrees, the LS3/5A almost sounds coloured. for if is no contest, i think the TAD was the most natural, KEF most neutral and B&W played nice too, they all played much better than the LS3/5A
I did a test in my shop in the 90 ies of small monitors and Rogers LS3/5a came out winner by large....no other speaker was so studied by listening tests....
What cables, electronic , Powercords using? The bowers sounding very bad. maybe due to silver cables or very bright Gears. Every speaker sounds different with upstream gears. Maybe your setup fit's the TAD and Kef
The TAD’s do something with the midrange that is not good - it’s artificial. If you were at that concert with Nils you would know that mids like that are very low / mostly eq’d out.
i prefer the kef ls3/5A, the most musical ? tad and kef reference are very close sonically not bad but something is missing (soul?), B&W is just inaudible more than a minute...
Thank you for the very helpful comparison video.
LS3/5A sounds the most natural to me. TAD and B&W seem to be good at expressing details, but B&W doesn't have good transitions in the mid-high range, giving it a mechanical feel. TAD is also clear, but I feel a resonance-like sound in the midrange.
The sound of the LS3/5A has a smoother transition from the midrange to the high range, and perhaps because of the compact, closed design, there is less resonance from the box, allowing me to immerse myself in the music. I think it's amazing considering the price difference.
Amazing to me that a speaker that was designed several decades ago can sound so good! Wow...bravo to the designer of the Kef LS3/5A.
TAD is my cup of tea 😊
As a proud owner I can confirm that.
Brilliant speakers!
The TAD ME1 sounds superior to the other speakers on test. Specifically, the sound is more transparent and there is more tonal density and weight.
Le meilleur et le plus réaliste est le Tad ME1, ensuite vient le Kef R et puis loin derrière le Kef ls3/5A et le N&B qui ne vaut certainement pas le prix demandé !!!
my two favs are ref 1 and ls3/5a
Great video. Hard to find audio shops that Carry all those brands. Thanks
I do not understand why you would even put the LS3/5A in this test, to me its clearly much outclassed by the other speakers, the other speakers are high end and transparent to varying degrees, the LS3/5A almost sounds coloured. for if is no contest, i think the TAD was the most natural, KEF most neutral and B&W played nice too, they all played much better than the LS3/5A
I did a test in my shop in the 90 ies of small monitors and Rogers LS3/5a came out winner by large....no other speaker was so studied by listening tests....
I completely agree with the results in this video as well.
What cables, electronic , Powercords using? The bowers sounding very bad. maybe due to silver cables or very bright Gears. Every speaker sounds different with upstream gears. Maybe your setup fit's the TAD and Kef
They all sounded exactly the same to me.
wonderful..!!! Thank you.
You kept changing speakers to confuse us! Can’t make sound judgement
TAD好聽但是價錢夠買另外3對喇叭了😂
Tad the best!!!💪🏻
The TAD’s do something with the midrange that is not good - it’s artificial. If you were at that concert with Nils you would know that mids like that are very low / mostly eq’d out.
Tads take several hundred hours to break in. I’d be curious as to how much time is on each speaker. If you don’t believe in break in don’t respond.
@@stevethetoolman2435 True!
Tad r the best one
猫主任你好，我关注me1很久了，苦于无米凑西装，只好退而求其次想说看看sur1000如何，又正好看到你在b站的视频，信心倍增，想问说，真的好推吗sur1000对于me1来讲？谢谢你
我认为r1000已经可以吧me1或者e1tx完全退满了
Thumbs down for the music without bass or dynamics. Its like showing sportscars at 10 mph and slow accelleration.
what amp was used? thanks
TECHNICS SU-R1000
jesus the bowers sounds bad.
Im a B&W 805 owner and the TAD wins hands down. The KEF is in last place.
i prefer the kef ls3/5A, the most musical ? tad and kef reference are very close sonically not bad but something is missing (soul?), B&W is just inaudible more than a minute...
the high of 805 sounds weird.
Tad me 1 is the winner
Tad by a mile
B&W is Winner !!!
tad = 805 d4 > 3/5a >>>>>>>>>>>>>kef for me.