The Harbeth is awesome, but the Rogers takes the sound to another universe! They are so magical that they leave me speechless, with my tongue hanging out, lol
LS3/5a: singer sounds much more real to me plus beautiful guitar and piano. P3ES: more air, tighter bass, more hifi. Mind you, I bought LS3/5a so I'm biased!
The Harbeths got my attention initially, but it was the LS3/5A that I ultimately fell in love with. They sound more realistic and have a subtlety which made the musical performance more absorbing and engaging for me.
Rogers project way better imaging & depth but less airy compared to Harbeth which I actually preferred “ also Rogers sound more musical for long listening enjoyment many level 😊👍
I'll just double up on what 'msee" commented. The Harbeth's balance is nice, and it's detail res. is noticably better than most speakers, but to me the Roger's LS3's equally great resolution, sweeter mids and more organic sounding treble adds to their musicality.
Thank you for interesting comparison, im using KEF 3/5a over 20 years old. 3/5a was designed from analog audio. P3esr XD is beter . but 3/5a is never tired (good for easy listening )
The Harbeth loudspeakers will play louder and are more forward, but the LS3/5a shines when you listen at moderate levels especially to the human voice. Few speakers can achieve the overall musicality of the little BBC Monitor. If you have a large room or play your music loud then the Harbeth is you better choice! I bought a pair of Chinese LS3/5a “clones” while they are very good they just miss on the human voice, depth and soundstage! I think the Chinese version can be improved with a better high frequency drive like the original T-27 KEF driver with the metal cover! There’s great potential here in both sound and price. The Chinese cabinetry is top notch and construction and attention to detail excellent. The last price I’ve seen was $650/pair. That price is really a bargain these days when LS3/5a’s are $1300/ pair and the Harbeth is about the same. I imported Chartwell LS3/5a’s and Spendors in the late 70’s. When they cost me $350.00/pair in teak.
@@Patryks26I don’t hear any veil. If anything the Rogers are more open and expressive to my ears. My fear is that they might be too revealing of poor recordings and show up the source/amplifier.
Se ti capita una coppia di AR M1 fai una prova comparativa con le casse che mostri in questo audio/video. Rimarrai a bocca aperta come successe a Mark Levinson che le "rubo'" ai tecnici di AR per provare le sue elettroniche. Buona domenica da Roma.
Love those mini monitors, but need speakers with real life instruments orchestre. Dynamics....grandpiano real dynamics so for speakers need minimal 95db/1w....or more
We just hear them from my hi-fi system.3 person's we have the same opinion: The Harbeths play more Nice, musical, natural sound. So i wonder 🤔 why all the others in the comments writes that Rogers are more Nice?
I don’t have a close to wall setup for my speakers and my floor is suspended hardwood. Am I likely to get satisfactory bass performance from these speakers. I place the speakers about 1.8 metre apart
comments like this make me laugh. The difference was subtle and imo the harbeth sounded better.If you are hearing a fuller tone on the basis of this video from the rogers than i am truly surprised. The Harbeth sounds clearly more fuller and the music sounds easier on the ear. The rogers sounds a little confused and bright. The rogers look far sexier though so i'm bummed the ugly harbeths sound better.
Thank you. I bought a pair of the Mavin stands for my Harbeth 30.2 XDs. These are the best looking and best sounding stands on the market. Take it from someone who has tried pretty much every pair stands out there. The tone, attack and leading edge definition of the solid rosewood… spell binding.
![[UNCUT] เพื่อไทยดันอุ๊งอิ๊งนั่งนายกฯ หลังเศรษฐาถูกถอดถอน | คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ | 15 ส.ค. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SpprmDJ6QEE/mqdefault.jpg)
The Harbeth is awesome, but the Rogers takes the sound to another universe! They are so magical that they leave me speechless, with my tongue hanging out, lol
LS3/5a: singer sounds much more real to me plus beautiful guitar and piano. P3ES: more air, tighter bass, more hifi. Mind you, I bought LS3/5a so I'm biased!
The Harbeths got my attention initially, but it was the LS3/5A that I ultimately fell in love with. They sound more realistic and have a subtlety which made the musical performance more absorbing and engaging for me.
I completely agree with you. The Rogers play under them like cheap car speakers.
Yes no argument from me.
Rogers project way better imaging & depth but less airy compared to Harbeth which I actually preferred “ also Rogers sound more musical for long listening enjoyment many level 😊👍
The Harbeths impress. The Rogers seduce.
I'll just double up on what 'msee" commented. The Harbeth's balance is nice, and it's detail res. is noticably better than most speakers, but to me the Roger's LS3's equally great resolution, sweeter mids and more organic sounding treble adds to their musicality.
Both are very nice. Rodgers are a bit warmer, I'd choose them. but I'd take either.
Couldn't understand a word and loved every minute. 🙂
Harbeth are more neutral, transparent, piano sounds amazing. Rogers are warmer, perhaps more pleasant for easy listening.
Harbeth has a wider soundstage seemingly sounds brighter whereas the Rogers is more in control with more detail to my ears
I found Rogers to be brighter. Sounds great on this recording, but I feel this could be an issue with a low quality recordings. Both great speakers
10:28 - Rogers ls 3/5
11:43 - Harbeth p3es
12:48 - Rogers ls 3/5
คุณภาพเสียง คุณภาพแอมป์ขับ ยอมรับว่าสุดจริงครับคุณเอ็ม
Thank you for interesting comparison, im using KEF 3/5a over 20 years old. 3/5a was designed from analog audio. P3esr XD is beter . but 3/5a is never tired (good for easy listening )
เสียง โรเจอร์ ออกจะเป็นธรรมชาติ เน้นเสียงกลางและต่ำ สังเกตจากเสียงร้องที่ลงคอจะกังวานและใหญ่กว่า ฮาเบท ซึ่งจะแหลมและมีเสียงซีสสมาก นักฟังจำนวนมากชอบเสียงแบบนี้ สรุปได้ว่า ปรัชญาการทำลำโพงของ โรเจอร์ ไม่เคยเปลี่ยนแปลง
I couldn‘t understand any single word, but i like your video because of the content! 😄👍
Oh!! Thank you so much😅😅
Roger Rogers 10/4....loud ,clear and detailed.
เหมือน 3/5 ถูกบูสความถี่แถว 7-10kHz ทำให้เสียง Snare ฟังดีกว่า รวมถึงเสียงกีตาร์ด้วย แต่แลกมาด้วยเสียงร้องที่สว่างเกินจริง ส่วน Harbeth เสียงร้องเป็นธรรมชาติ แสดงว่าคุมโทนย่านดังกล่าวได้ดีกว่า แต่เสียงกีตาร์ขาดความบาดหูไปนิดเลยขาดเสน่ห์ของกีตาร์ไป ส่วนเสียงเปียโน ผมยกให้ Harbeth ครับ ไม่แน่ใจว่าคน mix ต้องการให้เสียงออกมาแนวไหนเลยตัดสินยากว่าใครเที่ยงตรงกว่าครับ เพราะการบูสความถี่ดังกล่าวอาจมาจากคนอัดจงใจก็ได้ครับเพราะไมโครโฟนโดยมากจะยกความถี่แถวนั้นขึ้นอยู่แล้ว ด้านเบสเหมือนจะยกเบสต้นทั้งคู่แต่ฟังดูดีครับ ชดเชยเบสที่ลงได้ไม่ลึกพอดีๆ ถ้าฟังเทียบกันจริงๆ อาจให้ผลต่างไป ผมเคยมี 3/5a รุ่นที่ยังเป็นไดรเวร์ KEF จำเสียงตอนนั้นไม่ได้แล้วเพราะนานมากแล้วครับ
ขอบคุณครับ
The Harbeth loudspeakers will play louder and are more forward, but the LS3/5a shines when you listen at moderate levels especially to the human voice. Few speakers can achieve the overall musicality of the little BBC Monitor. If you have a large room or play your music loud then the Harbeth is you better choice! I bought a pair of Chinese LS3/5a “clones” while they are very good they just miss on the human voice, depth and soundstage! I think the Chinese version can be improved with a better high frequency drive like the original T-27 KEF driver with the metal cover! There’s great potential here in both sound and price. The Chinese cabinetry is top notch and construction and attention to detail excellent. The last price I’ve seen was $650/pair. That price is really a bargain these days when LS3/5a’s are $1300/ pair and the Harbeth is about the same. I imported Chartwell LS3/5a’s and Spendors in the late 70’s. When they cost me $350.00/pair in teak.
Are you testing the new Rogers LS3/5a or the vintage LS3/5a? Anyway, the Rogers sounds so much better than the Harbeth.
New Rogers 2022
Did you listen carefully? There is so much more voice details with P3ESR XD. You can hear every breath of the artist. With Rogers it is veiled.
@@Patryks26I don’t hear any veil. If anything the Rogers are more open and expressive to my ears. My fear is that they might be too revealing of poor recordings and show up the source/amplifier.
Se ti capita una coppia di AR M1 fai una prova comparativa con le casse che mostri in questo audio/video.
Rimarrai a bocca aperta come successe a Mark Levinson che le "rubo'" ai tecnici di AR per provare le sue elettroniche.
Buona domenica da Roma.
Both excellent mini monitors. In my opinions the Rogers are a little more expressive.
thanks
@@hifihousebymsound6631 which model of interconnect cables do you use?
Rogers for sure!
Just like the 5/9 comparison in the other video, The Rogers once again hv a more expressive & liquid midrange. The Harbeth sounds a tad dry here.
Harbeth ! No question about it !
grazie , bel video !
Love those mini monitors, but need speakers with real life instruments orchestre. Dynamics....grandpiano real dynamics so for speakers need minimal 95db/1w....or more
Prefer the sound of the Rogers.
Both designed with grilles on, why take them off?
Beautiful Rogers, fantastic clear sound.
โรเจอร นุ่มนิดๆ ก็ดีทั้ง2นะ ตอ้งมีใว้สัก2คู่ เผื่อฟังชุดนุ้นเบื่อ ก็อีกชุด ?...
Many compliments for the comparison. May i know the model of the wood stands?
I wish I could understand what is being said.
We just hear them from my hi-fi system.3 person's we have the same opinion: The Harbeths play more Nice, musical, natural sound.
So i wonder 🤔 why all the others in the comments writes that Rogers are more Nice?
Thank 😊
เฮอเบท จะออกไปทางสดใสครับ?....
Rogers seems be more transparent, cleaner.
Les Rogers sont plus chaleureux; les Harbeth sont peut-être un peu plus précis, plus hi-Fi mais il leur manque de la matière
Thanks
Rogers sont fantastiques............... Très naturelles
😊
Harbeth🔥🔥🔥🔥, Rodgers🔥🔥🔥
Both sound great to me. 😋
Both sounded overpriced to me.
Great test. Thank you so much.
Thank you for following.
Rogers sound more open n thick Harbeth more thin sound
thanks
not same,rogers litle bit metal but they are clear.
P3ESR are more real
Rogers LS 3/5a เสียงดีมากครับ
😊
Sound Comparison Rogers LS3/5A V/S Harbeth P3esr XD
9:14, 10:28
Harbeth 👍
👍👍👍👍👍
LS3/5A give more "soul" to the voice... P3 too flat for me
Thanks
สูตรชุดนี้สวยมากครับ
9:15
10:30
I don’t have a close to wall setup for my speakers and my floor is suspended hardwood.
Am I likely to get satisfactory bass performance from these speakers. I place the speakers about 1.8 metre apart
Rogers any moment
Rogers beat the crap out of Harbeth. Rogers sounds far better. Fuller tone more transparent, more live, taller soundstage.
Thank you for following.
comments like this make me laugh. The difference was subtle and imo the harbeth sounded better.If you are hearing a fuller tone on the basis of this video from the rogers than i am truly surprised. The Harbeth sounds clearly more fuller and the music sounds easier on the ear. The rogers sounds a little confused and bright. The rogers look far sexier though so i'm bummed the ugly harbeths sound better.
Who is the manufacturer of the speaker stands?
Mavin in Thailand
Thank you. I bought a pair of the Mavin stands for my Harbeth 30.2 XDs. These are the best looking and best sounding stands on the market. Take it from someone who has tried pretty much every pair stands out there. The tone, attack and leading edge definition of the solid rosewood… spell binding.
Rogers mes préférées ❤
The real problem is the cost of an amplifier able to drive 3/5 , better with valvs but of firt class .
The BBC used transistor amps when designing the 3/5a!
Yes , but with few Watts and a lot of Ampere as valve amplies !
9:14
10:29
Rogers
12:07, 13:08
I can listen to Rogers but I can't live with it,harbeth the ultimate in midrange and balance.
Harbeth 9, Rodgers 8.5
sottotitoli no?
Harbeth 9.5, Rogers 8
12:10,
Harbeth has little more body to the vocal where Rogers has that little more air and details. I prefer the less fatigue harbeth.
I think there are 11/12
😊
Both sounded overpriced to me.
Thai ❔
👍
Bán ko anh trai
Why do you speak with too much suffix hap hap hap.... What is the meaning of hap actually?
Who the **** is he ?
Small vocal on harbeth.
Thanks
p3esr win
Роджерс не правильно играет,слишком красит,металлом отдает,совершенно не естественно
Thank you for your comment.
Why is this being shown in the United States? This is a waste of time and space.
P3ESR XD FOR ME THX
Обе пары акустики ,просто акустика ,а внешний вид - только для гаража.