Great review! I’ve had my copy for about a month. This one-volume edition cuts down so much that I wouldn’t consider it one of my “go to” commentaries. Having said that, I find great value using this NIVAC one-volume book as an exegetical daily devotional, since I can easily read a portion of Scripture and a section of the book in about 15 minutes.
@DiscipleDojo peace and love in The Name YAHusha. Not very Christ like brother. Day 2 is truth!!! The firmament is a real life structure. I believe EVERY word of The Most High God. He says earth is immovable!!!! You will know them by their love. Brother, that comment shows your fruit! May The Creator's face shine upon you ❤️
I attended the church Walton was formerly an elder at and approached the elder board about getting curriculum in for the youth about creationism. Walton's protege looked at my frined and I and said if all you've got is this Answers in Genesis garbage then we are done here. I shifted from why the topic was important to defending the creation and young earth. He admitted that a young earth was the more straight forward view of the text and made such concepts as the first and original sin straight forward but then said that to defend the doctrines of the first sin and original sin is illadvised and that sin exists but we don't know where it came from. I read Walton's Lost World of Genesis book which basically states that the ancient people had a functional ontology such that they would talk about something but that didn't mean that it existed or came into existance but that they didn't even think about its existence until they identified or assigned its purpose. Futher that describing the ruach or dome meant they were really describing a temple in Genesis 1. How would we know that a people had such a view and it would mean that only an expert like Walton can tell us what Genesis means; a method cults often employ. Walton believed that God even allowed inaccurate views but Heiser challenged him on this saying that God used their views to setup a polemic. God's word is inerrant and infallable. The idea that a people would have such a different view of reality that words cannot convey meaning is really a post-modern view which denies that singular truth is knowable. It reduces language to merely symbotics that evolve from stimulus over time rather than divinely given and God breathed revelation and method of conveying the reality God created. Even in this day and age the eastern dialectic view which is very different from our western antithetic view of the world, even when they cross the street in New Dehli it is me or the bus not both. I will never believe that people would have such a different view of reality such that they would talk about something coming into existence but not really mean that it came into physical existence but merely was asigned its purpose. What we see in Genesis 1 is a use of phenomenal language. Like when we say the Sun rose, it doesn't really rise. When God creates the sky and they call it a dome they aren't saying its a dome they are saying it looks like a dome and if you look up the sky does kind of look like a dome. Futher the text doesn't just say day 1 and 2 and so on but it says there was evening and there was morning. This is quite emphatic. Now you could make the case that how long evening and morning is wasn't clear until the 4th day when the Sun and Moon were creaeted to tell times and season's but after that point you are set with evening and morning being the same times and seasons we are all familare with.
My experience is that the pastors are spending too much time in the Old Testament. Last 2 churches i have attended spent 80 percent of time on OT. 10 percent on I Corinthians and the rest on various NT passages. I may be an outlier, but that is my experience.
Greetings peace and love. Jesus NEVER taught the "NT"!!! Jesus preached his whole life and never read the book of Corinthians brother!!!!!!!! May The Creator's face shine upon you ❤️
@DiscipleDojo Surely, exegete is a noun. An exegete is someone who engages in exegesis. Language evolves, I know, but not always for the better. When did we stop being obliged and, instead, become obligated?! Urgh! Forgive my pedantry from this - the other - side of the pond.
Just bought it based on this video. Thanks for sharing.
You sold me not only on the One Volume Bible commentary, but on the Genesis single volume comment as well. Excellent review!
Thanks. Blessings from Finland !
th-cam.com/video/TjBKi3nobsg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=phEuG2O3XA6o3BgP
Great review! I’ve had my copy for about a month. This one-volume edition cuts down so much that I wouldn’t consider it one of my “go to” commentaries. Having said that, I find great value using this NIVAC one-volume book as an exegetical daily devotional, since I can easily read a portion of Scripture and a section of the book in about 15 minutes.
Great video and on point!!!
EARTH IS FLAT 💯
@@beegee1313 thanks for the troll comment
@DiscipleDojo peace and love in The Name YAHusha.
Not very Christ like brother.
Day 2 is truth!!!
The firmament is a real life structure.
I believe EVERY word of The Most High God.
He says earth is immovable!!!!
You will know them by their love.
Brother, that comment shows your fruit!
May The Creator's face shine upon you ❤️
I agree with the "Scripture Index" waste of pages unless those with multi-references. Keep only these. Thanks for review btw :)
Can you review the NLT chronological life application Bible? Your reviews are great.
@@kellymcmillan5964 I've reviewed the chronological Bible and the Life Application Bible, so there's not really anything to add to those, really.
I attended the church Walton was formerly an elder at and approached the elder board about getting curriculum in for the youth about creationism. Walton's protege looked at my frined and I and said if all you've got is this Answers in Genesis garbage then we are done here. I shifted from why the topic was important to defending the creation and young earth. He admitted that a young earth was the more straight forward view of the text and made such concepts as the first and original sin straight forward but then said that to defend the doctrines of the first sin and original sin is illadvised and that sin exists but we don't know where it came from. I read Walton's Lost World of Genesis book which basically states that the ancient people had a functional ontology such that they would talk about something but that didn't mean that it existed or came into existance but that they didn't even think about its existence until they identified or assigned its purpose. Futher that describing the ruach or dome meant they were really describing a temple in Genesis 1. How would we know that a people had such a view and it would mean that only an expert like Walton can tell us what Genesis means; a method cults often employ. Walton believed that God even allowed inaccurate views but Heiser challenged him on this saying that God used their views to setup a polemic. God's word is inerrant and infallable. The idea that a people would have such a different view of reality that words cannot convey meaning is really a post-modern view which denies that singular truth is knowable. It reduces language to merely symbotics that evolve from stimulus over time rather than divinely given and God breathed revelation and method of conveying the reality God created. Even in this day and age the eastern dialectic view which is very different from our western antithetic view of the world, even when they cross the street in New Dehli it is me or the bus not both. I will never believe that people would have such a different view of reality such that they would talk about something coming into existence but not really mean that it came into physical existence but merely was asigned its purpose. What we see in Genesis 1 is a use of phenomenal language. Like when we say the Sun rose, it doesn't really rise. When God creates the sky and they call it a dome they aren't saying its a dome they are saying it looks like a dome and if you look up the sky does kind of look like a dome. Futher the text doesn't just say day 1 and 2 and so on but it says there was evening and there was morning. This is quite emphatic. Now you could make the case that how long evening and morning is wasn't clear until the 4th day when the Sun and Moon were creaeted to tell times and season's but after that point you are set with evening and morning being the same times and seasons we are all familare with.
Earth is flat 💯
Thanks for the review. I've got the set (Logos) but have wondered how much they cut to make this and whether I could recommend it to people.
🌹💐🌟💐🌹
So is there a concordist movement that tries to dovetail with theories of a deterministic universe to argue against freewill à la Robert Sapolsky?
,,
My experience is that the pastors are spending too much time in the Old Testament. Last 2 churches i have attended spent 80 percent of time on OT. 10 percent on I Corinthians and the rest on various NT passages. I may be an outlier, but that is my experience.
@@jdunker6301 that is very much an outlier.
Greetings peace and love.
Jesus NEVER taught the "NT"!!!
Jesus preached his whole life and never read the book of Corinthians brother!!!!!!!!
May The Creator's face shine upon you ❤️
How silly. Everyone knows the specifications for the University of Georgia college buildings go in Leviticus, not Genesis. 😉
Exegeted. A new verb?!
I think it's a past participle of exegete.
@@edwardbell9795 not in biblical scholarship. It's simply the past tense of "to exegete." :-)
@DiscipleDojo Surely, exegete is a noun. An exegete is someone who engages in exegesis. Language evolves, I know, but not always for the better. When did we stop being obliged and, instead, become obligated?! Urgh! Forgive my pedantry from this - the other - side of the pond.