2229 Anti Gravity With Magnets?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.พ. 2024
  • Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @thinkingandtinkering
    Don't forget to check out my companion channels TnT Omnibus here / @tntomnibus and TnT Talk Time found here / @tnttalktime
    Credit Links
    Technical University of Denmark paper:
    journals.aps.org/prapplied/ab...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 231

  • @john_blues
    @john_blues 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    I'm just shocked that we didn't get Robert re-creating this in his shop. 2 magnets, a Dremel and some aluminum(aluminium)? I'm sure he's got those laying around.

    • @sparkysho-ze7nm
      @sparkysho-ze7nm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Th mission of the channel is to get viewers to investigate th simplicity of the idea

    • @JustGoAndFly
      @JustGoAndFly 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah Why don't you doit

    • @Jeffreyrbrady
      @Jeffreyrbrady 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haaah! No doubt about it bro!!!

    • @stevetobias4890
      @stevetobias4890 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I once thought that compressing magnetic poles would help to create magnetic vehicles. I now know that this is impossible.

    • @michaelsohocki1573
      @michaelsohocki1573 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rob has spoiled you. :)

  • @npsit1
    @npsit1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I think it has to be noted that there is a major difference between countering the effect of gravity and actually being "anti-gravity." Helium can counteract the effect of gravity on an object - like a balloon or a blimp. But specifying that something is ant-gravity seems to indicate that it actually cancels gravity itself.

    • @bryanjoachim5655
      @bryanjoachim5655 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I think, helium counteracts density rather than gravity. I could be wrong.

    • @TheIgnoramus
      @TheIgnoramus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bryanjoachim5655one could argue density is a big part of ant-gravity as well.

    • @gonegahgah
      @gonegahgah 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @bryanjoachim5655 Density is just how much overall material, including its sub-parts, is present in the space that it occupies. But that is still a good contribution you've made none-the-less because pressure is made from things trying to become more dense by squeezing in... but failing. If singularities were real then everything would just squash into a dot. Thankfully they are not, or the universe that we know would not exist. So, pressure is the result of all things trying to occupy the same spot and because they can't, this creates pressure, which is basically gravity acting against itself by trying to make everything fit into that tiny dot. So if gravity can act against itself in this way (the way of pressure) what is to say that it can't act against itself in other similar ways too. Take the Lagrange points. At these points you are not drawn to either gravitational body. The gravity is in balance (the way of between) and you won't fall any which way. But, what if gravity can also act against itself at the sub-atomic level. Not quite Lagrange like, no. And, what if magnetism is just a manifestation of gravity. The are no perfect magnets out there. A perfect magnet would be super fearsome to experience. We do, of course, have some very strong magnets like those made out of Neodymium. But, how could magnetism be the result of something so weak as gravity? That surely is absurd. Well, just as for the Lagrange points, and now gleaning here a sage correlation of pressure, what if there are ways for gravity to cancel out at the sub-atomic level also so that we only feel a tiny residual amount of the actual gravity that is present. We've seen that gravity can cancel out, pressure shows less dense objects rising against the call of gravity, plus there is no fear of falling at those special Lagrange points in space, and of course there is magnetism touted here. So what if this can also occur inside atoms by their very nature. Atoms are made of light and light moves very fast. But, it doesn't have anywhere to go because it is locked in its atomic prison. And there is a bucket load of light that forms those atoms. Just ask Einstein's famous formula. Is it just standing still? Is it not imparting any effect? Fortunately Einstein gave us "frame dragging" as well otherwise what the hell am I talking about. And, Einstein recognised light as being a gravitational source itself. Does it lose that when it becomes part of the atom? Why would it? Because it disappears? No, I assure you it is still there. So you've got all this light "moving", not orbital like, unless our moon were trying to deal with a tonne of other moons in kind of close proximity. So how is that going to work then? You've got all this light moving at a relative equivalent to their speed if they were unfettered light. And that must be creating a heck of a lot of frame dragging. So what does frame dragging do? It moves things a bit sideways. And what if that is happening inside atoms and at those relativistic speeds most of that sideways is acting against other sideways frame dragging. The Lagrange points have demonstrated, and pressure, that if gravity acts against itself it just "cancels out". Nothing magic about that. So, what if at the atomic level, where things like to stay at their lowest possible energy, and twist and turn to conform with that, what if that that is exactly what we get... a whole lot of nullified gravity. Maybe gravity is not so weak after all. And science admits that magnetism is the alignment of angular momentum, even if it argues about what angular momentum is. So what if magnetism is just "gravitational alignment". But what's the point of alignment if its just going to attract anyway? Well, the magic of 3D gives us clockwise and anticlockwise. No other number of dimensions does that! So here are two automatic opposites generously supplied to us by nature. What shall we do with them? Well, what if an angular momentum is clockwise in one direction (and anticlockwise the opposite) and its near neighbours are also. What if they are facing another object that is also similarly aligned. Well, the magnet is holding together and maybe it will want to grab onto that neighbour as well. What if the other object that is facing our object is pointing at our object with its clockwise face (so that it is oppositely aligned). Well, fight on! Maybe my suggestion is that they will repel each other. The other interesting thing is that if you could focus gravity like this, along a line spreading out through two poles, then it would decrease with distance in the same formulaic way as magnetism. So, we see everything coming together, gravity, pressure, momentum and 3D providing the only real possible spatial opposites, clockwise and anticlockwise. What else do you need? So, maybe just as hydrogen underpins all of our atoms, maybe gravity actually underpins everything (the way of oppositional drag). Maybe gravity, who appears so weak, is actually just showing us the neatest disguise that has ever been perpetrated...

    • @ortak741-un6nx
      @ortak741-un6nx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think you're absolutely right. Canceling gravity is not the same as creating a force against gravity. For antigravity, it is necessary to create an opposing force against gravity. I have been working on this subject for nearly ten years and I have managed to create a small amount of anti-gravity force. My work continues. I think I can make a bigger breakthrough in this regard this year. If there is no momentum, there is no antigravity. Antigravity is possible by creating a special momentum system.

    • @MrBonney1990
      @MrBonney1990 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dear Lord ladies….
      There is no such thing as gravity
      The earth just sucks

  • @cheesynuts4291
    @cheesynuts4291 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    This is the exact reason why over unity or things of the matter holds so many peoples attention. Such an incredibly simple realization that completely changes everything. And prior to that everyone would tell you you’re nuts if you believe otherwise. It’s ludicrous

    • @paulwolf8444
      @paulwolf8444 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      There are a lot of people who will not accept that life can be simpler than we think.

    • @bryanjoachim5655
      @bryanjoachim5655 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      to some of us, its simply "FM".
      F...king magic!@@paulwolf8444

    • @shawncalderon4950
      @shawncalderon4950 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well said!

    • @14supersonic
      @14supersonic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think a lot of solutions people have been looking for for decades or centuries even are much easier than we think.
      It's of the modern-day paradigm that people are starting to over complicated problems with complex mathematical theorems and other gatekeeping tactics.
      Many people before us solved most problems we've learned today with just mere observation, intellect, and intuition. All 3 of which most people are sadly deficient of these days. The scientific fields have been rife with intellectual dishonesty for a long time.

    • @shawncalderon4950
      @shawncalderon4950 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@14supersonic well said!

  • @zaneaussie
    @zaneaussie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Boyd Bushman worked for Lockheed Martin and conducted an experiment where he took two objects of identical size, mass, and aerodynamic surface, and dropped them from a height. One was inert, the other had two powerful magnets oriented with identical poles pushing against one another. The claim is that, when both were released simultaneously, the object with the magnets in it fell at a rate significantly slower than the inert object, in spite of both objects having identical mass, size, and aerodynamic qualities. This proves that two magnets having opposition to each other "becomes lighter" according to gravity. This should not happen if gravity is a constant. Very interesting Rob and thanks for sharing!

    • @themeek351
      @themeek351 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I'm guessing that eddy currents are adding resistance against the Earth's magnetic field slowing it down. Like when you drop a magnet through a copper pipe.

    • @14supersonic
      @14supersonic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Interesting, I vaguely remember learning about something like this. You've reminded me, thanks!

    • @14supersonic
      @14supersonic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​​​@@themeek351This is highly likely. Many scientists like Tesla have believed that the "universe is electric", in a basic sense energy is all around us. Of course many critics and disingenuous individuals passed this off as "fringe theory". However, due to much realization many people are beginning to come around to this idea again.
      I also think that many UFO/UAPs we hear about are using a variation of this same concept. Whoever are piloting these crafts, they realized that this was the truth a long time ago and developed different types of aerospace vehicles long before we made the plane.

  • @whatifididthis...1236
    @whatifididthis...1236 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Possibly the most accurate statement I’ve heard for a long time. “We clearly don’t know as much about magnets as we think we do”.
    Magnets are somewhat of an obsession for me, can’t stop thinking about them.

  • @theshark4120
    @theshark4120 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    How did anyone miss this so simple trick so far?

    • @codures
      @codures 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Maybe because 200Hz is 12000RPM and Dremel appeared when people stopped experimenting.

    • @theshark4120
      @theshark4120 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yeah, maybe it was just to uncommon to get to those RPMs before at home@@codures

  • @sebastianmatcovschi2481
    @sebastianmatcovschi2481 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    this effect is beautiful and it just makes sense. reaching equilibrium through gyroscopic precession. like a yoyo that spins with its axis vertically meanwhile being "stuck" to the thread. beautiful work, professor

  • @Inpropaic
    @Inpropaic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I remember my dad telling me about magnetic levitation back from when he worked in a lab in the 70s. It was a bit different I think and he said they sent AC through the metal floor and used a couple of motors and magnets strapped to their boots to float about the lab. He said it was really hard to balance. They put an end to it cause some guy fell onto the electrified floor and got serious burns and now he wears a mask. It's amazing what you can do with magnets.

    • @quangobaud
      @quangobaud 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'd like to know more about this killing-floor levitation prototype. There's probably a documentary in it.
      Health&Safety has put an end to the advancements we got from these brave pioneers!

    • @sparkysho-ze7nm
      @sparkysho-ze7nm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great comment ty

    • @drillerdev4624
      @drillerdev4624 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The making of a supervillain

    • @jamesalbright724
      @jamesalbright724 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Suppose we build a grand steel killing-floor with motors and magnets.This floats to Earths edge of atmosphere.The SCI-Fi movie The Expanse City can be real life.Employ Mr.Robert Murray-Smith and some wacky Scientist to power the nuclear fusion plantsites on earth to have indefinite clean power for 20,000 plus years.❤😂🎉thank-you Robert

    • @VeniceInventors
      @VeniceInventors 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      AC is not needed if the floor is made of aluminum, or better yet, copper. In any case the floor is bound to get hot due to the eddie currents. Actively cooling the floor can solve that problem but costs even more energy, so it won't be useful to efficiently move heavy objects. Other than using helium or hydrogen for lift, it's hard to beat the efficiency of hard wheels on a hard surface to move heavy loads. All the other methods I'm aware of (vibration, air cushion, electromagnets) require some energy input which is greater than the energy required to overcome the friction of metal wheels.

  • @georgeginsburg545
    @georgeginsburg545 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ohh, so that’s why flying saucers spin.

  • @wigreeves4097
    @wigreeves4097 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I like This one Robert .... since we can admit that we don't know everything about magnetic force .....and .....Electric force is hooked at the hip to it ....we have to say we don't know everything about electricity either .....we better start cracking don't you think ....

  • @craigsudman4556
    @craigsudman4556 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    I'm still waiting for my flying car, damit! Great video thumbs up.

  • @paulkeenanmusic
    @paulkeenanmusic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is my Jam! great video.

  • @mikaelfransson3658
    @mikaelfransson3658 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I JUST LOVE THIS ROBERT! With this knowlege and the new magnet from MIT! we can have new ways for really cheap infrastructur as long Peace is in the areas you live in you gone freight heavy loads! with four electric drilling machins! We talk about 72 watt to gear tons of kilogram! Now we talk about electrify on real terms! / Mikael

  • @ShafaqIftikhar-pw9ld
    @ShafaqIftikhar-pw9ld 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lovely insight Robert thankyou for the upload!!

  • @stevennope8864
    @stevennope8864 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Anyone else remember the youtube vid about the Searl effect generator? A flying saucer starts making more sense with this. Granted my memory is a bit fuzzy, but didn't he state that the generator had to be anchored to keep it from rising up into the air? Truth or fiction about the actual generator, I have no idea, but I could see how this discovery would explain how his generator was able to levitate.

    • @davestorm6718
      @davestorm6718 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Didn't that have spinning magnets?

    • @stevennope8864
      @stevennope8864 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @davestorm6718 Magnetic rollers spinning around a circle of center magnets I think. To be honest, I don't remember it very well. I don't think it worked as a generator. At least not one that was replicateable.

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      i know about the searl effect generator mate

    • @stevennope8864
      @stevennope8864 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've no doubt about that. it would definitely fall into your wheelhouse of knowledge, lol.@@ThinkingandTinkering

  • @f.a.5865
    @f.a.5865 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I doubt you have the time to read throuth your comments Robert, but I wanted to thank you for what you do. Your legacy here is invaluable and deeply appreciated and, I think, meaningful in a more elevated paradigm than we can get to think with our present state. May God keep blessing you Robert, as you bless us all

  • @KeithStrang
    @KeithStrang 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I’d like to see a no-moving-parts switching magnetic field achieving this same thing. Step two would be to amplify the field to enact against Earths magnetic field.

    • @matslarsson8790
      @matslarsson8790 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think it would have to be extremely strong to do that, but it would not be hard to build a simple test-unit, just a ring of electromagnets pulsed with the right frequency.

    • @KeithStrang
      @KeithStrang 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@matslarsson8790 that would be so cool to see!

  • @MichaelRada-INDUSTRY50
    @MichaelRada-INDUSTRY50 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Robert, great video

  • @billschwandt1
    @billschwandt1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I'm going to try this right now.

  • @themeek351
    @themeek351 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You can also spin an iron disk between two opposing stationary magnets to generate a current in the disk!

  • @ZionistWorldOrder
    @ZionistWorldOrder 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Respect and love for your work and your videos. Thank you. Sincerely from Türkiye.

  • @amphibiousone7972
    @amphibiousone7972 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It will be interesting to observe the effect, as it is placed under a load.
    Thanks , you always bring intriguing ideas forward. Good Fortunes, Great Successes 🤝

    • @MikaelMikkelsen0
      @MikaelMikkelsen0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely! Exactly what I was thinking

  • @Adam-xs3ng
    @Adam-xs3ng 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Insightful and thought provoking as usual.

  • @thom1218
    @thom1218 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How did the "Levitron" top not make it into this video?? That's decades old and is frankly defying gravity through its use of motion just as much as the magnets in this new discovery.

  • @a1yallop
    @a1yallop 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Fantastic, literally fantastic. I'd hazard a guess that this could be extrapolated to lift granite blocks weighing between 25 to 80 tonnes!

  • @marcfruchtman9473
    @marcfruchtman9473 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for this video! Yes, a spinning magnetic field somehow allows the magnets to do that "hovering"... which is incredibly amazing. One could imagine a train car with "spinning" sections floating on guide rails ... rather than friction on steel.

  • @douglascalhoun6471
    @douglascalhoun6471 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Fascinating, there is something new under the sun. This will lead to some interesting experiments and new avenues of exploration.

    • @jamesalbright724
      @jamesalbright724 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very interesting thoughts of spinning magnets versus using magnets in stationary applications.Thank-you for mentioning the 19th Century man and 1707 year invention.Stir your hot tea and enjoy with a minty leaf and square sugar cube.❤😂

    • @mikeconnery4652
      @mikeconnery4652 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I always wondered about magnets shaped for different functions. Like an S shape or a Y maybe an X shape. Magnets designed for different purposes.
      Also design an electric motor that uses both sides of a magnet.

  • @rldecluedeclue9152
    @rldecluedeclue9152 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sir.

  • @NottsBobUK
    @NottsBobUK 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you.

  • @GRILL332
    @GRILL332 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Omg Robert; DO IT, show us the magic!!! Show us how you would do it in your shop. Love the example that looks like a dremmel tool. We all have those!

  • @simongross3122
    @simongross3122 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a great discovery. Can't wait to see what else it can do.

  • @Biggles732
    @Biggles732 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I did read about some researchers in Sweden long ago getting some kind of antigravity effect by simply spinning magnets ,but not in the flux lashing orientation , but rather the orientation which wouldn't generate a current in a nearby wire..
    You also demonstrated the Faraday paradox almos exactly fouryears ago .

  • @svinkuk2652
    @svinkuk2652 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I find it so funny that no one ever thought, in all the history of magnets "im gonna spin that magnet next to another magnet and see what happens" until so recently!
    What else have we not figured out yet thats THIS simple?
    Is someone gonna invent zero point energy by shaking a lightbulb tomorrow? lol
    Funny old world.
    Much love

    • @VeniceInventors
      @VeniceInventors 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You just did. Shake the light bulb fast enough (in the right direction) and the magnetic field of the earth will induce an AC current in the wires, causing the light bulb to light up. If the air friction doesn't melt the light bulb first that is.

    • @svinkuk2652
      @svinkuk2652 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VeniceInventors hmm, thatll be some fast shaking lol

  • @glyngibbs9489
    @glyngibbs9489 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    So that's why flying saucers spin!

    • @sparkysho-ze7nm
      @sparkysho-ze7nm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Magnified microwaves

  • @terrylane1492
    @terrylane1492 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would love to see some more experimentation on your channel with this topic. I find it very intriguing. I would love to see some specific numbers on how much lift can be generated and what happens as they get closer or further away. Such an interesting phenomenon. I am a chemist, math guy by training, but I love magnets ever since I was a little boy.

  • @10sheds21
    @10sheds21 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I have a friend who is the embodiment of gravity plus. Wears shoes out at an alarming rate and although only tiny, two strong six footers couldn't lift her off the ground. I have pondered this for many years there is so much left to understand. Your video as always is enchanting

    • @kevinhutchinson9437
      @kevinhutchinson9437 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Have your friend stand with her palms face up and try to lift, then try palms down and notice the difference.

    • @kilokilos
      @kilokilos 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow, never heard of this although I know you are surrounded with a " protecting force" stopping serious harm from accidents.

    • @amandahugankiss4110
      @amandahugankiss4110 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      this is the stupidest thread on this video

  • @donm1547
    @donm1547 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Robert, it seems there may be some parallel with gyroscopic principles . When you mentioned the perpendicular aspect that's what reminded me of the gyroscope and properties observed there and possibly correlating with some of the properties that are happening with the magnets which may give more insight to the mechanics involved

  • @EgonSorensen
    @EgonSorensen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A piece of Pyrolytic Graphite will float/levitate above 4 magnets, or larger magnetic arrays. No spin required

  • @Ilamarea
    @Ilamarea 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's kinda strange that nobody had spun a permanent magnet before.

  • @qastielsolaris6322
    @qastielsolaris6322 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Absolute magic.

  • @kadmow
    @kadmow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the spinning magnet thingy is similar to the "controll-less / vibratory inverted pendulum" - vibrate a pivoting blade and it becomes stable - inverted (or in any position)

  • @OneOfAMineRocks
    @OneOfAMineRocks 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Two things!
    1. Never think you know everything about anything!
    2. STOP, I don't think that I cam pack anymore information from this channel into me brain!
    Naaaaa just a kidding, keep it coming, I'm about to invent something!🎉❤😂

  • @unclejohn11
    @unclejohn11 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Very interesting video thank you.

  • @RyanLebeck-td5ft
    @RyanLebeck-td5ft 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    When we consider the drag forces involved it is not difficult to see that the wake Currents from the primary spinning magnet align N/S N/S so the magnetic forces are effectively "locked in place" and therefore maintain equilibrium regardless of the frame of motion or observation.
    Those are my thoughts, though I welcome rebuttal and polite discourse of my opinion. Cheers all!

  • @someadvids5655
    @someadvids5655 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, this is fascinating mate, my mind is racing with visions of ways of building things just listing to this! But im just wondering a few things about this if you don't mind me asking you about this? But does the floater part have to move as well, as in its all ways trying to catch up with the rotating part at 200Hz? So would the floater part magnetic field be at “right angles” to or like “45 degrees out of faze” with the rotating part?
    And would this work with a set of Bifilar coil's? where both coils would be at 200Hz with one fluctuating from north to south and the second coil is fluctuating in the opposite direction from south to north or would the 2 magnetic fields cancel each other out at any point?
    Or could one have 2 electromagnets facing each other literally about an inch apart with the rotating part in the middle of the magnetic field being held at the 200Hz frequency? Like they do with the ultrasonic transducers set up? A fantastic informative video mate luv it! Take care and have a great day!

  • @richardblakely1296
    @richardblakely1296 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Spinning the bottom magnet while not spinning the top magnet,
    and inverting the setup, is more interesting.
    So, the inverted situation, of the ball magnet at the top,
    and the horizontal magnet at the bottom, should be tested.
    In the inverted setup, the Dremel would spin the vertical ball magnet.
    And the horizontal magnet (not spinning) would be suspended, at the bottom.
    Robert, please test the inverted setup!

  • @daveh6356
    @daveh6356 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There's still a huge amount to be discovered around gyroscopics too, especially considering when we're 'still' we're actually not. Taken independently these things are complex but combining them brings a whole new level of opportunity. Still can't create my flux diode though 🙁.

  • @Martiniums
    @Martiniums 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I guess its like playing table tennis with yourself very fast on a round rotating table. It is pushed away but then the other magnet is moved to push it the other way and so on and the further out of center it gets the more relative force against it. The floater ball is probably vibrating to show this. And if you slowed it down you may even get a big enough vibration to be used in a engine like those wind generators on grass stems you showed a while back. Moving towards a zero friction engine where all parts moved by magnatism.

  • @normandothegreat
    @normandothegreat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nothing prevents advancement as much as the arrogance of adhering to the tried and true! Think outside of the box and tinker if you want to truly change the world! 😊💛👍

  • @byronsowntime
    @byronsowntime 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    wonder how this would effect a neo with an electromagnet or vise versa... great upload Bob...cheers

    • @matslarsson8790
      @matslarsson8790 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Replace the permanent magnets with coils and feed them with AC at different frequencies? An interesting idea.

  • @jeff7798
    @jeff7798 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wouldn't the aluminum plate create eddy currents like when you take a magnet and put it in a copper tube because they are both conducted? I love your channel I watch it almost every morning, thank you for all your effort.

  • @TheTruthPlease100
    @TheTruthPlease100 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's creating a secondary field because just like if you spin something fast enough it "looks like" a solid object. It is only a partial magnetic field until it is spinning fast enough to close the field.

  • @johnnorth9355
    @johnnorth9355 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So a circular ring of magnets spinning around a central stationary magnet should produce some interesting effects ? Maybe two or three rings even more so, especially if counter rotation is used ?

  • @bentationfunkiloglio
    @bentationfunkiloglio 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MagnetoStatic is my favorite Marvel character.

  • @meltinginmissoula7044
    @meltinginmissoula7044 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why would any body want to be against gravity? It might be more soothing if one were to get whole heartedly immersed in the subject, and then dolefully swim around.

  • @StephenRansom47
    @StephenRansom47 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bravo 👏
    I’ve been watching the progress of the Electric Universe theorists for some time, and Yes; Indeed! Physics has left a lot of Magnetic and Plasmatic thinking on the cutting room floor… We may not know much, but we’ve ignored far more. 🍻

  • @murb2586
    @murb2586 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey man, ever read wal thornhill hypothesis electrogravitics, youre exactly the mentality to explore its propositions. Thank you

  • @14supersonic
    @14supersonic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've been studying Hamdi Ucars work for a while now, and I've been looking to improve this concept using a combination of static magnetic fields and dynamic electromagnetic solutions.
    I think if an intelligent power delivery system can be made, with relatively low power output thresholds, then you can somewhat directly convert the mechanical process of the rapidly rotating magnet into an EM system.
    I've believed for a while now that EM is the way to go because static magnets can not be scaled. However, EM systems are only limited by the overall power that can be provided to it. So, in theory, you can manipulate whatever the size of the object you want to effect on the fly.

  • @lap773
    @lap773 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Recently watched a video by The Action Lab on Faradays Paradox. Any thoughts on how the interactions could be similar, in terms of the counterintuitive effect spin has in both regards.

  • @deltonlomatai2309
    @deltonlomatai2309 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The magnet hover boards are interesting. They require a metal plate to float. I wonder if that could be done using the earths magnetic field? It does make it possible to make an electronic motors that don't use alternating magnet fields.

  • @DavidPlayfair
    @DavidPlayfair 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe Robert is being cautious about anti-gravity devices knowing how Eric Laithwaite fared on the subject?

  • @ghost9955
    @ghost9955 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder how this might work in micro gravity. I'd imagine it's already been done, but it seems like an interesting next step.

  • @benjaminpiltz5987
    @benjaminpiltz5987 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They don’t describe how the magnets need to be orientated sadly. At least in front of the paywall.

    • @PerilousPaddy
      @PerilousPaddy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1st picture on the 1st page!

  • @stevelacroix2917
    @stevelacroix2917 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Gravity is not the issue. Precise Magnetic Control

  • @kiboshkooks
    @kiboshkooks 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best free thinker on here, great

  • @dadsonworldwide3238
    @dadsonworldwide3238 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Orientation and direction problems in all feilds of study and disciplines share some common problems on this and other things

  • @ortak741-un6nx
    @ortak741-un6nx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have been working on this subject for nearly ten years and I have managed to create a small amount of anti-gravity force. My work continues. I think I can make a bigger breakthrough in this regard this year. If there is no momentum, there is no antigravity. Antigravity is possible by creating a special momentum system.

    • @davidrandell2224
      @davidrandell2224 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well..... everything.

    • @ortak741-un6nx
      @ortak741-un6nx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidrandell2224 Thank you for providing this information. I respect your thoughts, but rest assured that I do not need information from anyone, whether it is old or new information. When the time comes, the whole world will learn about antigravity from me. I swear on my honor and dignity on this matter.

  • @NillionaireNewsNetwork
    @NillionaireNewsNetwork 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the spinning was my point with that doddy drive notion. flat panes for lift and angled serrations for spin. and slightly hemisphereical to keep it in place above the stator. and the rotor and stator both have flat panes and serrations. on top of such a rotor disk you have have NSNS magnets on top of an insulating layer to generate AC. I just think that um. it creates a slip stream i guess. it would slip off the other field rather than keep bouncing off, but do both of these actions at the same time. I'm no scientist

  • @Dalorian1
    @Dalorian1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If i was to build a track with a series of rotating magnets in line, with a longer magnet above this line of spinning magnets, could I build a levitating body along a track that would be able to move along it?

    • @sparkysho-ze7nm
      @sparkysho-ze7nm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Balance?

    • @Dalorian1
      @Dalorian1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sparkysho-ze7nm yeah, the idea would be that it would automatically balance and stay in line with the row of spinning magnets.

  • @crohkorthreetoes3821
    @crohkorthreetoes3821 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Years back I made a levitating 'top' but it only levitated when I first spun it up and then it fell over. I guess I was actually pretty close to discovering this effect, had I further considered it.

  • @simonsimon-gq3rk
    @simonsimon-gq3rk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    hi!
    little words on miroslav turbine?
    and about the noel felici electrostatic generator?
    thanks for your fantastic work! ;-)

  • @mooneym.3642
    @mooneym.3642 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dear Rob I want to make a request that when possible please do a video on bronze and iron scrap flow battery. It will be awesome. Thank you.

  • @stevefrancis4949
    @stevefrancis4949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Puts in your mind the spinning of planets and creating a magnetic field.

    • @lap773
      @lap773 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The idea probably aligns more to the viewpoint of the electric universe (Thunderbolts Project).

  • @sidthemyth
    @sidthemyth 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the beginnings of the tech of flying saucers. magnetic fluid at speed in a torus etc...

    • @matslarsson8790
      @matslarsson8790 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think that's the secret of ufos, probably combined with super conductors to achieve an incredible strong field that can cancel gravity.

  • @WynterLegend
    @WynterLegend 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does the rotating magnet interact with charged gasses and/or plasma? Would it suspend a "bubble" of it from the magnet?

  • @clickbaitnumberone1403
    @clickbaitnumberone1403 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    a Turkish electronic, just pickin up a dremel, well, what else to say.....

  • @Kangsteri
    @Kangsteri 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm still waiting for the hoverboard :D

  • @user-kl5ki2ee1w
    @user-kl5ki2ee1w 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What if per say you have 4 magnets two of which is doing the rotation levitation then you have one side that raises up and that one magnet that's still in magnetic field have the extra object that 2 magnets are doing the levitation will move with the object and the 2 rotating magnets? I want some neomagnets to play with. I think when we get far enough with certain research we can do magnets that pulls or reveals that one magnet that we are trying to move in large range with very intense speed. I really would like to experiment with this and how it react with the other metals. I think the magnet stuff would work better using cooling and heating methods. And also a knock method that will hit a magnet to attract or pull it. I really would like to play with some of the magnets stuff in wyoming newly found.

  • @MathewTitus
    @MathewTitus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There's a fairly new (well, more like recently declassified) idea that gravity is a illusuary force - in that what Newton was observing with the apple was really a quantum phenomenon - involving radiating photos - pushing on the objecf rather than two masses creating a pulling effect.
    Of course, this would entail throwing away much of our understanding - from Newton to Einstein - of what Gravity really is.
    In effect though - by making this one simplification and adding an extra FIFTH dimension - we can actually get the theory to work mathematically.
    It's then entirely possible then to build an entirely "anti-gravity" craft by simply manipulating the electromagnetic field.
    Not suggesting you try that or anything...
    😂 Cheers, Robert!

  • @MrDschubba
    @MrDschubba 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will the rotating magnetic fields induce currents in nearby metal and waste a bunch of energy as eddy current?

  • @thewatersavior
    @thewatersavior 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Safe to assume this works with man-made magnets? Also.. does the plate position and mass have an impact

  • @RickySupriyadi
    @RickySupriyadi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    so when a car have this the wheels rotate when it moving we can have floating suspension?

  • @u3b93
    @u3b93 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In China MAGLEV is in commercial operation, been on one!

  • @terrylane1492
    @terrylane1492 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Something about this feels like it could have some impact in a big way. Hard to explain though lol

  • @waynec369
    @waynec369 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Professor Laithwaite (spelling?) had an intuition about the unwordly possibilities of magnetism and was totally and completely shunned by his colleagues. Much like what happened to Tesla.

  • @AdamBechtol
    @AdamBechtol 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Neat stuff.

  • @wageslaveuranus9596
    @wageslaveuranus9596 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Somehow ad a centriptal precession component like the spinning wheel experiment ?

  • @DirkLarien
    @DirkLarien 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    makes me want to experiment with rotating some ferofluid or mercury.

  • @abbiebeast
    @abbiebeast 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not necessarily "against" any laws of physics as there are none that can't be demonstrated otherwise as approximations, rather it expands on what is commonly thought as accepted dogma

  • @LexLuther-sf3zm
    @LexLuther-sf3zm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have you tried this yourself? I went and bought a drimmel just for it not to work. Extremely frustrating. I'm really hoping to see you preform it so that I can figure out what I'm doing wrong. I can't even get it close. It just throws the magnet. Ive been trying for about a year now. I've also tried using different magnets and motors with no success. Please help!!!

  • @iamgadgetboy
    @iamgadgetboy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We should probably observe how Jehovah does it and watch planets spin and move around a large magnet like the sun and how they move around an axis without wavering too much and dropping out of phase then we'll be onto something, thanks for bringing this to our attention Rob love your work!

  • @ITpanda
    @ITpanda 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about polymagnets, have we achieved static levitation with those?

  • @idonotcomplyrevolution
    @idonotcomplyrevolution 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    in physics and in mathematics they are not "laws" they are theory, this is because theories eventually become outdated, found to be inaccurate, found to be void, or remain unchallenged as science moves forward. another reason is many of these so-called "laws" are based upon/adhere to pure theoretical physics theory, so they only really exist within an equation or set of equations until a direct repeatable observation and even then we are often met with paradox after paradox.

  • @TheAdeybob
    @TheAdeybob 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    if you can levitate it, then you should be able to attract it. Future artificial gravity in low-g may be achieved via 'some kind' of magnetism pulling objects to a plate..?

  • @Fr333man
    @Fr333man 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Static charge is levitation 10 to the power39 stronger than gravity,

  • @travismoore7849
    @travismoore7849 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gyroscopic lift exist it is basically a spinning wheel with four spinning wheels spinning perpendicular to the large wheel each one fourth the mass of the big wheel. The goal is to make a gyroscopic vortex that is counter to the gravity well of the pull of gravity on earth to make gyroscopic antigravity.

  • @craftymulligar
    @craftymulligar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seen people levitate static magnets with no rotation or electricity.

  • @mikeconnery4652
    @mikeconnery4652 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting video

  • @malachiteofmethuselah9713
    @malachiteofmethuselah9713 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Makes one wonder if this is the real how and why electrons are manifested around spinning nuclei.

  • @WarkWarbly
    @WarkWarbly 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And to think you can do the same with liquid oxygen. Fun stuff but kinda dangerous 😅