Now that it’s a year(ish) later, how’s the 450 holding-up? I’ve completely maxed out my Slingshot 250, and I’m looking to move up to something that will allow me to grow my kit. I’ve been looking at the Flipside Trek 450 and the ProTactic 450 AW II. Thoughts?
A year on from purchasing/using this bag, I can categorically say it is the BEST camera bag I've ever owned. It doesn't look much different than when I first bought it, other than being muddy from use (I definitely don't 'baby' my kit!)
Sean Taylor As an avid backpacker, I’m always looking at weight, to include the weight of the pack. I noticed that the ProTactic 450 is 2.295kg (5.06 lbs) and the Flipside Trek 450 is 1.69kg (3.72 lbs). This might be the deciding factor. The tactical webbing on the ProTactic might look cool, and it does have the added benefit of expansion with Molle gear pouches, BUT...is it worth the added weight and the potential of carrying stuff you’ll never use?
@@virginiacamper Personally, it depends on how much gear you want to take with you. On photography-specific trips, I will take a 5d2, 17-40, 24-70, 70-300, 50, 2 filters, batteries, 1L nalgene, snack, map, mobile phone, battery pack, raincover, and probably have just enough room for some snacks. I've been considering some overnight trips once lockdown is eased, and I think I'll have to cut the load or maybe put a camera cube into another backpack entirely. This is a fantastic 'day trip' pack if you have someone with you to assist with supplies, but if you've got to carry a whole day's worth of food, water, and spare clothing, space starts to get tight.
@@virginiacamper i have this flipside trek 450 and lowepro Powder Backpack 500 AW . i think just a day trip flipside is great but for overnight camping powder is great way more then enough for multiday. BTW it also got removable camera cube (included) and lot more. i tried lot of other bags (shimoda, fstop , atlas) but i think i am settled on lowepro. hope it helps
Great review! I have the 350 and am considering also purchasing the 450 due to an upcoming trip where I'll need more capacity. I think you've sold me on the 450! Thanks.
Good review! The Flipside Trek the are amazing, I buyed 350AW for my DJI drone and for my Mirrorless camera. Thank you for the great video! Greetings from Spain
The best comparison between 350 and 450 so far! Some questions: - is the backpack water resistent? - I've read some complaint about the quality of the material: what's your opinion about it? - after one year and half do you have any pros or cons to add to your review?
That's a good question! Honestly, not at all. All of the initial thoughts I had on the backpack demonstrated in the video still remain - weird clips, 'flimsy' feeling straps, but the backpack is REALLY solid. It's still going strong after all this time, and I would say it is by far the best backpack I've owned. It is a fantastic trade off against camera bag and regular bag. Actually - one observation is that when walking around in the heat, the part of the bag which sits against your back can get a little gross - I had to wipe it down with a damp cloth - but I think that's more to do with me than the bag!
Thanks for this review I like how you had both backpacks to review. Would have been great to do a side by side of how much gear you can hold in each bag. I have the 350 and now come to realize I have outgrown this size. Although the 350 is a great day pack it is a bit small for traveling on extended days. It is time for me to upgrade to the 450 and I hope that it can hold my 13" laptop well.
4 ปีที่แล้ว +2
Thanks for this video I was correctly be able to choose between the models. Great review 👍
Nice review Sean of the two bags. Clear, concise and informative; especially the "after the trip" observations. I was looking for something smaller than my full gear camera bag that I could use traveling/site-seeing with non-photographers in Italy. Because I'm now shooting with Fuji XT-3 cameras and lenses that save weight, size and money (compared to my old Nikon setup), I ended up purchasing the 350. It's a nice compromise that allows bring along the essential camera gear and also carry a jacket, snack and such without standing out in the crowd with a big pack. Keep up the videos, you're a natural in front of the camera.
I know this is old, but thanks for the review. This is actually the only video I found that directly compares the 350 with the 450 versions. I was really hoping you would demo adjusting that top divider section though lol. Not sure if you even still read comments for these videos, but if you do, do you still use this bag? How has the quality held up? I see some reviews online of sections of the bag ripping and Lowepro not honouring the lifetime warranty.
Thanks for the review Sean. You mentioned that the divider in the top compartment can be moved down, but can it be moved up or removed entirely? I'm searching for a bag to carry audio equipment and I like the flexibility of being able to fit a blimp in this bag assuming that divider is removable. Thanks.
They are the same functional design, presumably the 450 is just larger. Sorry, I didn't measure it and I don't have the 350 any longer. For reference, in my top compartment on the 450 I can fit a 1L nalgene, Anker rechargeable battery pack, an apple, a raincoat, and a few other bits and bobs. It's enough to pack lunch for the day and water OR pack spare clothes and water, but not really both. Bear it in mind - this is a great bag for being out and about for a few hours, but on a really long hike I'd prefer something that was more suited... or get the wife to carry the spare water!
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Awesome thank you for the information... I shoot Sony mirrorless so my body and lenses are small. Was thinking 450 then gives me plenty of room for a day hike in the mountains. Collapse the camera compartment to give me more room for clothes and food etc. But the 350 sounds like it would be more comfortable and less bulky. Decisions decisions ha
@@SeanTaylorPhotography 350 makes more sense for my camera size etc.... I just know how much junk I could fill a 450 with ha. Cheers for the video though helped loads
It's hard to say to be honest - I would say probably not based on the fact the lens is about 26cm long and the internal dimensions of the bag are 26cm height. If you were to put it in, it would be a squeeze and you'd probably not be able to attach the lens (as in you'd have to carry the lens and the body detached). The internal dimensions of the 450 are about 6cm taller, so even then I wouldn't be happy carrying a combo that big. Honestly I'd probably be looking for a different bag if you're wanting to carry larger telephoto lenses. Hope that helps.
Well, what can I say? Excellent. It answers one question I had very well... would a body [mine is a D810] fit in when it has an L bracket on. My Whistler 450 will, but if I want to take a stripped-down kit of body, 24mm PC-e lens with 24-70 2.8 and my gorgeous Zeiss 21mm along with filters etc, then where do I put the rest of my kit? The answer is now as clear as crystal... I leave that in my Whistler and buy a Flipside 450. One small criticism of the video though. Near the beginning, you say that the top compartment is good for water. I would NEVER put water above my equipment. It's asking for the worst to happen. A Sigg bottle strapped to the side would be a much better bet.
Thanks for your comments Nick! I use a Nalgene and I'd be more concerned about my batteries leaking lithium than I would be that thing leaking water, but fair point nonetheless!
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Nalgene are good, but having seen aluminium Sigg bottles give out* then I would be wary. Excellent video. Well considered and presented and incredibly useful in comparison with many TH-camrs. * Heavy-handed use, and NOT one of my cared for ones!!
I'm in the market for a hiking camera bag and couldn't decide between the 350AW and the 450AW. Well, thanks to your brilliant video, I've now decided on the 450. Your comparison of the two bags side by side was so helpful and the amount of camera gear you could fit into each bag was the clincher. Like you, I have a thing for camera bags (6 so far!!) and am always on the quest for the perfect bag. I always think the latest one I buy is THE one - but of course it never is. However, the 450 AW looks like the best I've ever seen. So thanks again for your help. Cheers, mate.
Good morning, thank you for the great review, simple and clear. I only have one question because I usually use a Pentax k 70 with two lenses and a flash (af360 fgz) and a Canon A 1 (from 1979) with two targets (28 and 50 mm FD) and a flash (155). In your experience, is the Trek 350 enough or do I necessarily have to go on the 450? I really like your videos and in fact I signed up! Continue like this. Thanks, Jacopo.
Thanks for the kind words Jacopo! For two cameras I would say to go for the larger 450 :) my camera bag is full with a Canon 5Dmk2, Canon 17-40, 24-70, 50 and 70-300.
People take so much extra gear when out. I've never had the need for a spare battery, a strap, or a remote release. If I need to take a photo without the worry of me pressing the shutter causing camera shake, I set it to self-timer mode and allow 3-5 seconds between me pressing the button and the shutter opening.
So,. why do you put the tripod on the side instead of onthe front? I use the 350 and that is the way I carry the tripod. I feel that the weight is more balacned that way.
I'm hoping to use the front as well. However, are there side pouches to put the bottom of the tripod in? I don't like the idea of the tripod only being held by two straps, as I plan on cycling with it.
Most other people haven't mentioned the divider between the main compartments, are you sure that it's detachable? Because that would be an awesome feature but you would think that someone else would highlight it
Yeah you can remove it but trust me - not as awesome as you might think. It's never been removed in all the time I've had the bag. It's just so useful to keep in place!
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Huh, I was planning on having a minimal amount of camera stuff and as much hiking clothes as needed so it's unfortunate if isn't useful
@@xWood4000 I'd recommend getting a hiking pack and a camera cube like Peak Designs do (www.peakdesign.com/products/camera-cube?variant=11530961649708) - when I am doing pure photography focus I take the Lowepro, but if photography is secondary and I'm hiking focused then I take an Osprey Hikelite 32 with a Lowepro Toploader instead. This is an adequate hiking pack, don't get me wrong, and I've done many long hikes with it, but if you don't need ALL the space for camera stuff, just get a hiking pack tbh.
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Thank you! Yeah I also thought about comfort, there doesn't seem to be camera backpacks that have Osprey levels of comfort although they there seems to be very comfortable ones. I have to think about how I put the cube in, but otherwise your advice is probably the better option. I will have to get a camera backpack too, but maybe not for hikes.
In the video it looks to me that you are using the tripod in the two straps to the side of the bag. Is there also a pocket on this side that you could put the bottom of the tripod into, before attaching the top strap? I don't like the idea of leaving the bottom strap to stop the tripod falling out, as I plan on cycling with this set up. I have a 3LT Brian by the way, so 16 inches long without head.
Hey Daniel - thanks for watching. There are indeed pockets on both sides of the bag. They are big and stretchy. I usually put the tripod on one side just hanging down (each side has two straps) and my Nalgene in the other. I don't usually put the tripod straight on the back of the bag as this stops the bag sitting flat on the ground, but sometimes I do. Either way on each side of the bag there are 2 straps and a 'pocket' - you could put the bottom of your tripod in there for sure, but I don't as it would cause the tripod to be a bit top heavy for my liking.
Hard to say really. I think I prefer the design of the flipside trek as it more suits me for the hiking/walking I do - looks like it's a sleeker design with more walking support (waist straps and sternum strap) plus it's more secure from pickpockets as you can only access the camera gear when the bag is off.
Probably the 350 tbh. I'm 5'11" and the 350 fit my frame better and felt more comfortable. If I had a smaller camera and lenses I would go for the 350. The 350 physically wouldn't fit my camera. Right now with 4 lenses (17-40, 50, 24-70 & 70-300) it's a squeeze but everything fits fine. For a G9 I would 100% go for the 350.
Hmm not really. You could fit it I guess if you had to travel with it by placing inside the main compartment underneath the camera equipment but really it wouldn't fit. A very small 10" laptop/tablet could fit in the front pocket but that's kind of it. I travelled with a very compact 10" netbook and it just about fit.
Unfortunately not. Typically if I don't want to use them I just strap them around the bag but honestly the way they're designed I never felt like they got in the way even if I didn't want to use them all the time.
Now that it’s a year(ish) later, how’s the 450 holding-up? I’ve completely maxed out my Slingshot 250, and I’m looking to move up to something that will allow me to grow my kit. I’ve been looking at the Flipside Trek 450 and the ProTactic 450 AW II. Thoughts?
A year on from purchasing/using this bag, I can categorically say it is the BEST camera bag I've ever owned. It doesn't look much different than when I first bought it, other than being muddy from use (I definitely don't 'baby' my kit!)
Sean Taylor As an avid backpacker, I’m always looking at weight, to include the weight of the pack. I noticed that the ProTactic 450 is 2.295kg (5.06 lbs) and the Flipside Trek 450 is 1.69kg (3.72 lbs). This might be the deciding factor. The tactical webbing on the ProTactic might look cool, and it does have the added benefit of expansion with Molle gear pouches, BUT...is it worth the added weight and the potential of carrying stuff you’ll never use?
@@virginiacamper Personally, it depends on how much gear you want to take with you. On photography-specific trips, I will take a 5d2, 17-40, 24-70, 70-300, 50, 2 filters, batteries, 1L nalgene, snack, map, mobile phone, battery pack, raincover, and probably have just enough room for some snacks. I've been considering some overnight trips once lockdown is eased, and I think I'll have to cut the load or maybe put a camera cube into another backpack entirely. This is a fantastic 'day trip' pack if you have someone with you to assist with supplies, but if you've got to carry a whole day's worth of food, water, and spare clothing, space starts to get tight.
Sean Taylor For backwoods, multi-day trips, I’m planning on a camera cube (or HEX Ranger Sling) in my Osprey Atmos 65 AG.
@@virginiacamper i have this flipside trek 450 and lowepro Powder Backpack 500 AW . i think just a day trip flipside is great but for overnight camping powder is great way more then enough for multiday. BTW it also got removable camera cube (included) and lot more. i tried lot of other bags (shimoda, fstop , atlas) but i think i am settled on lowepro. hope it helps
Omg, you really showed a side by side comparison when wearing that bag. This blew my mind. Thank you so much!
Doing God's work
This is the best review I've seen about this backpack model so far. You showed exactly what I needed to know about the depth. Thank you so much.
Ah that's so nice to hear! Thanks so much Luciano :)
Best comparison between the 350 and 450. Straight to the point. Thank you sir !
Thanks mate!
Why do you only have 67 subscribers ? You deserve a thousand times more.
Ah man that's super kind Thanks! I just make videos for fun so I'm glad you enjoyed it!
Thank you. No wasted preamble but a thorough, everyday use of the bag review.
Best review I've seen on this rucksack.
Great review! I have the 350 and am considering also purchasing the 450 due to an upcoming trip where I'll need more capacity. I think you've sold me on the 450! Thanks.
Thanks Sean. The side by side comparison between the two was useful to see.
Good review! The Flipside Trek the are amazing, I buyed 350AW for my DJI drone and for my Mirrorless camera. Thank you for the great video! Greetings from Spain
The best comparison between 350 and 450 so far!
Some questions:
- is the backpack water resistent?
- I've read some complaint about the quality of the material: what's your opinion about it?
- after one year and half do you have any pros or cons to add to your review?
That's a good question! Honestly, not at all. All of the initial thoughts I had on the backpack demonstrated in the video still remain - weird clips, 'flimsy' feeling straps, but the backpack is REALLY solid. It's still going strong after all this time, and I would say it is by far the best backpack I've owned. It is a fantastic trade off against camera bag and regular bag. Actually - one observation is that when walking around in the heat, the part of the bag which sits against your back can get a little gross - I had to wipe it down with a damp cloth - but I think that's more to do with me than the bag!
Very good comparison !
I will opt. for the 450 since i need more space and anyway will have no problem with the fitting because of my size !
man, very useful video, just what I need now. thanks heaps
Thanks for this review I like how you had both backpacks to review. Would have been great to do a side by side of how much gear you can hold in each bag. I have the 350 and now come to realize I have outgrown this size. Although the 350 is a great day pack it is a bit small for traveling on extended days. It is time for me to upgrade to the 450 and I hope that it can hold my 13" laptop well.
Thanks for this video I was correctly be able to choose between the models. Great review 👍
Nice review Sean of the two bags. Clear, concise and informative; especially the "after the trip" observations. I was looking for something smaller than my full gear camera bag that I could use traveling/site-seeing with non-photographers in Italy. Because I'm now shooting with Fuji XT-3 cameras and lenses that save weight, size and money (compared to my old Nikon setup), I ended up purchasing the 350. It's a nice compromise that allows bring along the essential camera gear and also carry a jacket, snack and such without standing out in the crowd with a big pack. Keep up the videos, you're a natural in front of the camera.
Thanks for the kind words Mike!
Another useful thing about the flip is when you live in the desert like I do. If you put your bag on the ground it is going to get covered with thorns
Excellent review now I know I will buy the 450 👍
Thanks for these complete test
This was such an excellent review!
Thanks!
Thanks for the review - very interesting
I know this is old, but thanks for the review. This is actually the only video I found that directly compares the 350 with the 450 versions. I was really hoping you would demo adjusting that top divider section though lol. Not sure if you even still read comments for these videos, but if you do, do you still use this bag? How has the quality held up? I see some reviews online of sections of the bag ripping and Lowepro not honouring the lifetime warranty.
Still use the bag and it's still amazing. Haven't had any parts of the bag fail or rip so have no idea what people are doing to cause that...
Good review and comparison of the sizes. Thanks for posting!
Great review, keep up the good work.
Thank you for this great review! I like this style and your review bevor and after travelling and the conclusion.
Great video! Do you think it would fit a sigma 150 600mm lens?
Rear entry lol. Nice review, thank you.
Great and helpful review- thanks!
Thanks for the review Sean. You mentioned that the divider in the top compartment can be moved down, but can it be moved up or removed entirely? I'm searching for a bag to carry audio equipment and I like the flexibility of being able to fit a blimp in this bag assuming that divider is removable. Thanks.
It can definitely be removed but due to the design of the bag I'm not sure it can be moved up.
Great comparison.... is there much difference between the 350 and 450 top compartment? Thanks
They are the same functional design, presumably the 450 is just larger. Sorry, I didn't measure it and I don't have the 350 any longer. For reference, in my top compartment on the 450 I can fit a 1L nalgene, Anker rechargeable battery pack, an apple, a raincoat, and a few other bits and bobs. It's enough to pack lunch for the day and water OR pack spare clothes and water, but not really both. Bear it in mind - this is a great bag for being out and about for a few hours, but on a really long hike I'd prefer something that was more suited... or get the wife to carry the spare water!
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Awesome thank you for the information... I shoot Sony mirrorless so my body and lenses are small. Was thinking 450 then gives me plenty of room for a day hike in the mountains. Collapse the camera compartment to give me more room for clothes and food etc. But the 350 sounds like it would be more comfortable and less bulky. Decisions decisions ha
@@jonnykano121 if I had mirrorless I would be inclined to go with the 350... though I'm sure I'd fill up the 450 anyway!
@@SeanTaylorPhotography 350 makes more sense for my camera size etc.... I just know how much junk I could fill a 450 with ha. Cheers for the video though helped loads
good job ... if I want to carry a TV like the m zuiko 100-400 and the 40-150 ... which model would you recommend? thanks
Excellent review. Will the 350 take a Canon 400mm f5.6 prime lens plus a Canon 7Dii?
It's hard to say to be honest - I would say probably not based on the fact the lens is about 26cm long and the internal dimensions of the bag are 26cm height. If you were to put it in, it would be a squeeze and you'd probably not be able to attach the lens (as in you'd have to carry the lens and the body detached). The internal dimensions of the 450 are about 6cm taller, so even then I wouldn't be happy carrying a combo that big. Honestly I'd probably be looking for a different bag if you're wanting to carry larger telephoto lenses. Hope that helps.
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Thanks for the prompt reply, very helpful.
Great review, thank you.
Brilliant review
Well, what can I say? Excellent. It answers one question I had very well... would a body [mine is a D810] fit in when it has an L bracket on. My Whistler 450 will, but if I want to take a stripped-down kit of body, 24mm PC-e lens with 24-70 2.8 and my gorgeous Zeiss 21mm along with filters etc, then where do I put the rest of my kit? The answer is now as clear as crystal... I leave that in my Whistler and buy a Flipside 450. One small criticism of the video though. Near the beginning, you say that the top compartment is good for water. I would NEVER put water above my equipment. It's asking for the worst to happen. A Sigg bottle strapped to the side would be a much better bet.
Thanks for your comments Nick! I use a Nalgene and I'd be more concerned about my batteries leaking lithium than I would be that thing leaking water, but fair point nonetheless!
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Nalgene are good, but having seen aluminium Sigg bottles give out* then I would be wary. Excellent video. Well considered and presented and incredibly useful in comparison with many TH-camrs. * Heavy-handed use, and NOT one of my cared for ones!!
Why weren't you able to keep the tripod on the front?
I'm in the market for a hiking camera bag and couldn't decide between the 350AW and the 450AW. Well, thanks to your brilliant video, I've now decided on the 450. Your comparison of the two bags side by side was so helpful and the amount of camera gear you could fit into each bag was the clincher. Like you, I have a thing for camera bags (6 so far!!) and am always on the quest for the perfect bag. I always think the latest one I buy is THE one - but of course it never is. However, the 450 AW looks like the best I've ever seen. So thanks again for your help. Cheers, mate.
Will it fit a 15/16 inch laptop? THANK YOU!!!
Good morning, thank you for the great review, simple and clear. I only have one question because I usually use a Pentax k 70 with two lenses and a flash (af360 fgz) and a Canon A 1 (from 1979) with two targets (28 and 50 mm FD) and a flash (155). In your experience, is the Trek 350 enough or do I necessarily have to go on the 450? I really like your videos and in fact I signed up! Continue like this. Thanks, Jacopo.
Thanks for the kind words Jacopo! For two cameras I would say to go for the larger 450 :) my camera bag is full with a Canon 5Dmk2, Canon 17-40, 24-70, 50 and 70-300.
Very good review !
Glad you enjoyed it :)
People take so much extra gear when out. I've never had the need for a spare battery, a strap, or a remote release. If I need to take a photo without the worry of me pressing the shutter causing camera shake, I set it to self-timer mode and allow 3-5 seconds between me pressing the button and the shutter opening.
So,. why do you put the tripod on the side instead of onthe front? I use the 350 and that is the way I carry the tripod. I feel that the weight is more balacned that way.
I'm hoping to use the front as well. However, are there side pouches to put the bottom of the tripod in? I don't like the idea of the tripod only being held by two straps, as I plan on cycling with it.
Hi nice video ... My spec will D500, 200 500Mm, 18 55mm ,50 mm will 450 fit my requirements
Most other people haven't mentioned the divider between the main compartments, are you sure that it's detachable? Because that would be an awesome feature but you would think that someone else would highlight it
Yeah you can remove it but trust me - not as awesome as you might think. It's never been removed in all the time I've had the bag. It's just so useful to keep in place!
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Huh, I was planning on having a minimal amount of camera stuff and as much hiking clothes as needed so it's unfortunate if isn't useful
@@xWood4000 I'd recommend getting a hiking pack and a camera cube like Peak Designs do (www.peakdesign.com/products/camera-cube?variant=11530961649708) - when I am doing pure photography focus I take the Lowepro, but if photography is secondary and I'm hiking focused then I take an Osprey Hikelite 32 with a Lowepro Toploader instead. This is an adequate hiking pack, don't get me wrong, and I've done many long hikes with it, but if you don't need ALL the space for camera stuff, just get a hiking pack tbh.
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Thank you! Yeah I also thought about comfort, there doesn't seem to be camera backpacks that have Osprey levels of comfort although they there seems to be very comfortable ones. I have to think about how I put the cube in, but otherwise your advice is probably the better option. I will have to get a camera backpack too, but maybe not for hikes.
In the video it looks to me that you are using the tripod in the two straps to the side of the bag. Is there also a pocket on this side that you could put the bottom of the tripod into, before attaching the top strap? I don't like the idea of leaving the bottom strap to stop the tripod falling out, as I plan on cycling with this set up. I have a 3LT Brian by the way, so 16 inches long without head.
Hey Daniel - thanks for watching. There are indeed pockets on both sides of the bag. They are big and stretchy. I usually put the tripod on one side just hanging down (each side has two straps) and my Nalgene in the other. I don't usually put the tripod straight on the back of the bag as this stops the bag sitting flat on the ground, but sometimes I do. Either way on each side of the bag there are 2 straps and a 'pocket' - you could put the bottom of your tripod in there for sure, but I don't as it would cause the tripod to be a bit top heavy for my liking.
@@SeanTaylorPhotography Thanks for the reply - that answers my question. Fantastic review by the way.
I hesitate between this bag or Fastpack Pro BP 250 AW III. Who's the best for you ? Tks
Hard to say really. I think I prefer the design of the flipside trek as it more suits me for the hiking/walking I do - looks like it's a sleeker design with more walking support (waist straps and sternum strap) plus it's more secure from pickpockets as you can only access the camera gear when the bag is off.
Hello I have a lumix G9 and a few lenses which back pack would you go for the 450 or the 350 ? thanks for any help.
Probably the 350 tbh. I'm 5'11" and the 350 fit my frame better and felt more comfortable. If I had a smaller camera and lenses I would go for the 350. The 350 physically wouldn't fit my camera. Right now with 4 lenses (17-40, 50, 24-70 & 70-300) it's a squeeze but everything fits fine. For a G9 I would 100% go for the 350.
Sean Taylor ok thanks for answering my question I really appreciate it ! 🙂
Any option to fit a 16 inch laptop inside the bag? Thanks
Hmm not really. You could fit it I guess if you had to travel with it by placing inside the main compartment underneath the camera equipment but really it wouldn't fit. A very small 10" laptop/tablet could fit in the front pocket but that's kind of it. I travelled with a very compact 10" netbook and it just about fit.
What tripod do you own with those cool orange accents?
It's a Three Legged Things Travis, check out my video review here: th-cam.com/video/wK2iWbl42v4/w-d-xo.html
I wish the waist straps are removable? Any possibility they can be partially removed?
Unfortunately not. Typically if I don't want to use them I just strap them around the bag but honestly the way they're designed I never felt like they got in the way even if I didn't want to use them all the time.
Sean Taylor hey thanks a lot for the reply. Can you post a picture of them strapped around the bag? They should look uglier that way though hahah
@@zenza7120 imgur.com/a/f9XUsiE
Good review ;)
Thanks!
Hi! Can i use the 350 on the airplane?
Hey! Yeah the 350 would fit easily. The 450 definitely fits but it's quite the squeeze.
Are you selling that bag? :D
great review!
Glad you enjoyed it!