It is almost impossible for a person to write and think without biases. Everyone has their opinions on things, and that will always shape how you see the world. You can try to achieve writing that is as fair as possible, but completely avoiding biases is impossible.
That's why it's important to have someone else read what you have written and provide feedback. A different perspective can shed light and provide an a-ha moment!
How could it Always be a logical fallacy? That is a stereotype of stereotypes. LOL. Africa is POOR! Not everyone in Africa is poor, some aspects of Africa break the stereotype (Cape Town). But as a generalization, it is accurate for quickly contextualizing the economic situation in Africa. It is POOR! It is not developed like Europe. That stereotype is tied to something in reality. Streogypes when used as guides are just that guides, they can also do a lot of injustice since (as you stated) exceptions occur. Stereotypes are quick and easy and lack nuance. But no volume of nuance is going to take Africa from poor to rich.
A fallacy is simply a "flaw in reasoning." Using a fallacy in an argument doesn't mean that the conclusion reached is incorrect. While stereotyping does show flawed reasoning (and therefore undermines the justifications for any conclusion reached) it does not automatically invalidate any conclusions reached while stereotyping.
I like this video because it was well delivered. I have gained new knowledge and insight watching this video, my perspectives on bias and stereotypes has changed. Thank you.
So if 0.001% is an exception then it would be impossible to make ANY statement about anything. How far will you take this? Most men are physically stronger than most women is factual. Two body builders is not going to change that. Avoiding reality means we cannot make any statement about anything. Americans understand English, if that is 99|% then it has met the required threshold to be a fact.
The statement "Most men are physically stronger than most women" can be correct, even if there is a proven exception (such as the bodybuilders mentioned). That would comport with reality, rather than avoid it. Saying "All men are physically stronger than all women" is where you would start to have an issue.
We do hope the video was helpful to you. Be sure to check out our website at www.mometrix.com if you ever need study materials for a specific standardized exam.
Stereotypes are real and dangerous. The stereotype that most police officers are racist and are going to kill black people have cost hundreds of innocent police officers' lives.
![งมหอย จับปลา มือเปล่า หาอยู่หากินแบบวีถีอีสานกับแก๊งเซียนหรั่ง ม่วนคัก! [ขอนแก่น] @Sianstudio](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JEJZg6N-AbU/mqdefault.jpg)
🚨New, updated video here: th-cam.com/video/UCSIiw-WaOc/w-d-xo.html
Thank you for watching!
5th Stereotype is correct.
It is almost impossible for a person to write and think without biases. Everyone has their opinions on things, and that will always shape how you see the world. You can try to achieve writing that is as fair as possible, but completely avoiding biases is impossible.
That's why it's important to have someone else read what you have written and provide feedback. A different perspective can shed light and provide an a-ha moment!
How could it Always be a logical fallacy? That is a stereotype of stereotypes. LOL. Africa is POOR! Not everyone in Africa is poor, some aspects of Africa break the stereotype (Cape Town). But as a generalization, it is accurate for quickly contextualizing the economic situation in Africa. It is POOR! It is not developed like Europe. That stereotype is tied to something in reality. Streogypes when used as guides are just that guides, they can also do a lot of injustice since (as you stated) exceptions occur. Stereotypes are quick and easy and lack nuance. But no volume of nuance is going to take Africa from poor to rich.
A fallacy is simply a "flaw in reasoning."
Using a fallacy in an argument doesn't mean that the conclusion reached is incorrect. While stereotyping does show flawed reasoning (and therefore undermines the justifications for any conclusion reached) it does not automatically invalidate any conclusions reached while stereotyping.
I like this video because it was well delivered. I have gained new knowledge and insight watching this video, my perspectives on bias and stereotypes has changed. Thank you.
So if 0.001% is an exception then it would be impossible to make ANY statement about anything. How far will you take this? Most men are physically stronger than most women is factual. Two body builders is not going to change that. Avoiding reality means we cannot make any statement about anything. Americans understand English, if that is 99|% then it has met the required threshold to be a fact.
The statement "Most men are physically stronger than most women" can be correct, even if there is a proven exception (such as the bodybuilders mentioned). That would comport with reality, rather than avoid it.
Saying "All men are physically stronger than all women" is where you would start to have an issue.
Thank you
I always thought stereotypes as jokes and not acutely real
We do hope the video was helpful to you. Be sure to check out our website at www.mometrix.com if you ever need study materials for a specific standardized exam.
Stereotypes are real and dangerous. The stereotype that most police officers are racist and are going to kill black people have cost hundreds of innocent police officers' lives.
I have watched 6 videos and this is the most well explain! Thanks 🙏🏽.
Great explanation...Waaaaaoooooo😇😇
I subscribed, not only that you explained well, but because I like the way you're talking. You're so gorgeous. Thank you!
Amazing video🔥
Thanks! We are glad you liked it. We also offer great study materials for specific exams on our website at www.mometrix.com.
Keep it up
We are glad you enjoyed the video. Be sure to check out our website as well at www.mometrix.com.
Thank You
You're welcome. We are glad it was helpful. Check out our website as well at www.mometrix.com.