I've practiced the real Dadao about close to four pound. They were useful against bayonet/rifle attacks. The rifle/bayonet is about 11 pounds and is effective but slower than a spear trust. So using a dadao one could effectively block/trap a trust and counter effectively. Great close in weapon, very effective.
Great video. I would really enjoy more application videos of different weapons. On youtube there are mostly wushu forms, but I'm more interested to see these weapons in real practical application.
Too happy to see this! This is definitely much more practical than those in wushu. Wish that it would become a combat sport one day, in which competitors, in full protection gear, could have full contact fights with wooden weapons (saber Vs saber, saber Vs spear/rifle with bayonet), like fencing, kendo but of Chinese characteristics. The Chinese martial arts style footwork and change of stances could be retained in demonstration as a respect for tradition but should be simplified and modernized in interactive practices and competitions.
yes it is. wushu was very practical. However, some stupid people have changed the moves to meet the requirement of wushu competitions. That is why wushu now is more like dances
yes, this is reprinted. you can get a copy from some china book store. or you can go to this site. brennantranslation.wordpress.com/2016/06/17/jin-enzhongs-saber-manual/
Very good video!!! But I sae a little flaw in the excecution in some techniques. For example at 3:17 and at 3:05 because youre not holding the contact to the opponents weapon. Your saber is too far from the opponents weapon away. That would cause an attack where you have to figure out to block it from right OR left. If you would block like in the form but make a step forward youre standing in the right distance and you only have to cover one side. But the rest was absolutely gorgeous.
If you have a spear, u will be foolish to charge straight on against someone with a sword. Better to jab from a far, make good use of your length advantage. Make multiple feign jabs to tired him out. Moving a real sword around to block will be tiring.
it is practical. First of all, the "silly" footwork is used to avoid being hit by the bayonet. Secondly, it is not a sword. It is a Dao and it was used during the second world war against armies that didn't wear armor. This is the standard fighting technique used by the Chinese army during the second world war (lack of guns) for close combat and it is called 破锋八刀. At the battle of 喜峰口 the Chinese army used these techniques against the Japanese and achieved initial victories. The sword spinning is very important because Dao is heavy and it's supposed to cut and the spinning adds strength to the cut.
There is more practical sword play here in 5 minutes than hours of other stuff have seen on TH-cam
I've practiced the real Dadao about close to four pound. They were useful against bayonet/rifle attacks. The rifle/bayonet is about 11 pounds and is effective but slower than a spear trust. So using a dadao one could effectively block/trap a trust and counter effectively. Great close in weapon, very effective.
Great video.
I would really enjoy more application videos of different weapons.
On youtube there are mostly wushu forms, but I'm more interested to see these weapons in real practical application.
能在人的反应极限下高速应用才是真功夫，必须穿上护具实战对打！
Too happy to see this! This is definitely much more practical than those in wushu.
Wish that it would become a combat sport one day, in which competitors, in full protection gear, could have full contact fights with wooden weapons (saber Vs saber, saber Vs spear/rifle with bayonet), like fencing, kendo but of Chinese characteristics.
The Chinese martial arts style footwork and change of stances could be retained in demonstration as a respect for tradition but should be simplified and modernized in interactive practices and competitions.
yes it is. wushu was very practical. However, some stupid people have changed the moves to meet the requirement of wushu competitions. That is why wushu now is more like dances
Thank you brother, for making this
Nice.sound basics,good use of the spine & side of blade in the defense.
In watch the cuts, I wonder how many Japanese solders met the ancestor that way.
lots
好功夫!
Very good display!
這種刀法100%是破刺槍術用的！
抗日时大刀队就靠这个白刃战
These look great! Is the form taught in the book? Is the book widely availabel?
yes, this is reprinted. you can get a copy from some china book store. or you can go to this site. brennantranslation.wordpress.com/2016/06/17/jin-enzhongs-saber-manual/
想知道59秒之後的背景音樂將軍令出自哪張音樂專輯。
beautiful work! thx
Very good video!!! But I sae a little flaw in the excecution in some techniques. For example at 3:17 and at 3:05 because youre not holding the contact to the opponents weapon. Your saber is too far from the opponents weapon away. That would cause an attack where you have to figure out to block it from right OR left. If you would block like in the form but make a step forward youre standing in the right distance and you only have to cover one side. But the rest was absolutely gorgeous.
wanna see his partner keep pushing after the first attack
wanna see if your big mouth helps you on the battle field
Good techniques ! George Wu, AIA,ARCHITECT,NCARB 2016-6-30
很好，缺了点,气势
Awesome...
If you have a spear, u will be foolish to charge straight on against someone with a sword. Better to jab from a far, make good use of your length advantage. Make multiple feign jabs to tired him out. Moving a real sword around to block will be tiring.
大刀隊的破日軍的刀法！
❤!
应用得有些勉强
刀太小...............................................................
砍刀在抗戰中的戰績並不盡如人意，即使取得喜峰口大捷的第二十九軍大刀隊，夜襲日軍的500大刀隊將士也僅有50餘人生還
隨著抗戰形勢的好轉，到1939年以後，中國軍隊全部改為使用刺刀
不是這樣解釋的 !!!
其實，這個古籍有解釋呀.....您可能沒有涉獵到這個部分。
吳殳《手臂錄》：長兵進退手已神，短兵進退須足利，足如毚兔身如風，三尺坐使丈八廢。
簡單的說就是，在訓練良好的戰士手中，長槍跟大刀的勝率只是一半一半。
大刀只要跳入槍尖的後方，迴避槍尖的威脅，長槍就可以頓時變成廢物。
................
但是，在訓練不足的戰士手中，又是另外一回事了。
前面提到，大刀要打贏長槍必須跳入，
也就是說大刀要有 好的身法、靈活的步法、還有好膽量 才能對抗長槍。
所以，使刀必須經過精良的訓練，才能有靈活的步法，才能足如毚兔身如風，才能對付長槍。
相反的，長槍不用.....長兵進退手已神.....長槍直接拿到手上，即使缺乏訓練，也有相當的威力跟威脅性。
...............
抗戰時，戰鬥員大量的死傷，戰場上要找訓練精良、慣用大刀的中國戰士，
談何容易 !!!
傻逼
@@古德林-i4v长枪和38式步枪加刺刀是两码事，38步枪加刺刀空仓是3.8公斤，这是4-5m的长矛才能达到的重量，在冷兵器里面决定没有这么不合理的配重，枪刺只是为了便携性而妥协的产物，只要你经过训练之后上手一把38步枪就知道，刺枪出去之后因为重量太重而很难快速收回，所以枪刺压根不是合格的冷兵器
@@洪祖面
●我想，練過刺槍術的人都"不會同意"這種說法 !!!
●我練的是 美國M-1步槍(台灣稱30步槍)，
●沒有上刺刀。
..................
我一點也沒有覺得是不合格的冷兵器。
反而，覺得很好使，念念不忘。
所以，這兩年又去外面偷撿大木棍來練刺槍術。
..................
只有你一個人覺得不好使 !!!
Real big knife or broadsword techniques....all for self defense and attack.
抗日战争大刀白刃战吃了血亏。正视历史，这种招数实战并不管用。别再自欺欺人
沒辦法，人家日本的「刺刀座」會噴火，手上只有冷兵器沒法比
是是是，吃亏吃的日军重新装备了武士刀形制的95.98军刀，而且在下级士官中大量配发，远远超过中国军队的军刀数量😅
三個字 教壞人
....Practical? Not really, remove the silly footwork and sword spinning first.
it is practical. First of all, the "silly" footwork is used to avoid being hit by the bayonet. Secondly, it is not a sword. It is a Dao and it was used during the second world war against armies that didn't wear armor. This is the standard fighting technique used by the Chinese army during the second world war (lack of guns) for close combat and it is called 破锋八刀. At the battle of 喜峰口 the Chinese army used these techniques against the Japanese and achieved initial victories. The sword spinning is very important because Dao is heavy and it's supposed to cut and the spinning adds strength to the cut.
Practical? The Japanese Imperial Army thought so.