1998-04-14 NSPRS 095 - Plato's Parmenides and the Diamond Sutra
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มี.ค. 2018
- This material is posted under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
See creativecommons.org/licenses/....
Pierre Grimes and the Noetic Society -- 1998-04-14 NSPRS 095 - Plato's Parmenides and the Diamond Sutra
Plato's Parmenides, Proclus' Commentary, and the Diamond Sutra. Thanks to Bob Keller for filming, Julie Grabel Postel for producing and funding, and Sean Angier and Lisa Bivens for editing and digitizing from VHS to DVD. noeticsociety.org
Thank you..
Amazing Lecture, thankyou!
This is really interesting. Thank you
17:24 systematic model assertions
Parmenides' theory of Being stems from the foundational idea that language and reality are inherently interconnected, but is this true? In Parmenides's native language at the time uttering "yes" and "no" had to involve a determination regarding the reality or unreality of the objects mentioned in the statements. Consequently, "yes," or "is," assumes the role of signifying truth, while "no," or "it is not," denotes its opposite. It seems to me the Eleatic conception of reality is caused by a limitation in language.
We live in an intelligible reality with Mind so it's the ideas, states of mind that are interconnected while also being the reason for their own connection. To understand Parminedis on Being one needs to do a Dialectic in the highest sense on non-being or not being.
Change, and "not" Motion.
they're interchangable
Motion does move. Google: Acceleration
Acceleration is predicated on Motion. Does the idea of Acceleration accelerate?
@@midnightexpress8347 Funny you ask ! Sometimes I wonder if the only thing in motion is the Concept, or rather, if motion is more than appearance, if the term Motion is more than nominal or conventional, then maybe the real motion is Negation itself, the negative motion of Concept through its self-opposite determination, to its Anti-Concept, and on and on and on, but Ive been wrong before 😂 Peace ! 🕊️
@@caselbravo could it be motion was set in motion through ‘emotion’- emotion as defined in this sense as ‘contradiction’ - as emotions are contradictory to logic, and one would say they were acting ‘emotionally and not logically’ which caused a contradiction in character.
If we were to think in terms of a mover moving, there would be two motions rather than one: that motion which makes the mover a mover, and that motion by which it moves. The reason for this is that a mover is an example of an individual where a distinction between its constitutive and instantiated properties cannot be drawn. The constitutive property is what constitutes an individual (object) and the instantiated properties are had by the individual (moving). It would mean we would require two different motions: one which constitutes the individual and one which is its property.
too slow ... pick it up, Peter.
@Living Gaul LOL !!! Good idea !!
Just watch it on double speed
@@oscarjablon155 Thanks for the reminder !
😂 made me LOL
His name's Pierre and his laconic style is beautiful....