Hi mate, I just wanted to give some serious kudos for taking the time making these videos. Super helpful, sussinctly explained and just well put together. Thanks
I just had a one hour lecture and did not understand anything ! And then came here to Marcus’ video and understood the topic in under 10mins! Thank you so much Marcus, you saved me from 1st year of uni !
You are amazing. I had a 14 week EU Law class and these videos condensed almost all of it into a few hours. Direct effect was a concept that was more difficult to grasp, and you made it simple! I did well on my exam due in part to this video series. Thanks again!!
I have been reading about this all night and I didn’t understand a word. Two minutes into this video and I’ve learnt more than I have all night! Thank you!!
I have an exam tomorrow and thank you very much for making this video. You are a gem and you will be in my prayers. A genuine thank you from a Brunel University student ❤️
Hey there Marcus I just want to say a big thank you to you for your videos as they have helped me so much to pass my EU class.Not only are your videos easy to understand but you make so much effort to explain everything so well.You are a saviour.
Thank you very much for your effor put into all these EU law videos. Despite the fact I'm not from UK they were incredibly helpful when it comes to EU law exam! WELL DONE MARCUS!
I have an exam in a few hours on this and until now I have had no clue what this entire topic is about, even after hours watching and reading through the lecture & lecture notes, thank you so much :)
Great video ! I just want to point out that the conditions under the Van Gend en Loos 1963 decision (2:07) were actually decided by the Van Duyn 1974 decision
Amazing video as always, Marcus! Please do a Charter of Fundamental rights next, since its a regular question and it will be really helpful. Thankyou so much for uploading!
Thank you!!! Lifesaver! I feel so confident about my examination for EU LAW! Hoping for a good mark, with your helpful lectures I will definitely do well.
Thank you so much mate, you’ve saved my EU lessons… I do wish that you could have been my instructor on this topic 😂😂 you are much much better than her…
Amazing video! Especially with the university strikes and the whole coronavirus situation, teaching at my law school has been very low quality with final year exams coming up in a week so this video was a life saver! Thank you so much!
directives can have horizontal effect as well, by using the court system (which is an extension of the state) This is the way that Corina can take action against the state. if corina were to use Benus LTD she would using the court as an emanation of the state is obliged to abide by EU Law. Create the family for horizontal direct effect between individuals. (Cases Von Colson). if an individual want to have vertical direct effect and enforce their rights against the state i need to define what a state is (provides a public service and is under the control of the state can be considered an emo nation of the state Forster and British Gas) Venus LTD can be seen as providing a public service as it administers beauty treatments to individuals, while not under the BTTS it is still subject to Blacktown Council (as seen by it being shut down) so it can be considered a public service
question: when it gets to indirect effect and the state has to interpret the EU law with MS law, how come it ever goes to state liability then, doesnt it just get inrepreted?? what are the reasons that indirect wouldnt work??
I have a problem question that I have been struggling with. It is with regards to the usefulness of indirect effect as a legal doctrine in the enforcement of directives? Thank you
In a nutshell under the 1972 European Communities Act places EU laws over and above those made and implemented in the UK with with both direct and indirect effect. The vertical and horizontal influences of each party and each law, regulation or treaty are interwoven now and cannot be clearly separated. Perhaps this is why 17.4 million people voted to leave the EU and have national parliamentary sovereignty back to what it was before Heath took the UK into Europe on the 1st of January 1973.
Altough i understand the fact that people want their sovereignty. It is perfectly defensible to say that the benefits of having an EU (free movement of people and goods, easier trading etc.) Should bring uniformity in legislation and therefore less sovereignty of the member states. In my opinion this is perfectly defensible.
Hi , Thank you for the lecture videos they help a lot for exams I would like to ask you what is the effect of indirect effect on criminal liability cases.I have read a paragraph in a book and it was talking about the case of Arcaro (1996) and also the case of Criminal Proceedings against luciano(2005) but i have not understand anything .
Say there is a directive that says I cannot wear a baseball cap inside. The UK fails to implement it in time so it is not actually illegal. It would then be unfair to prosecute me for something that has not actually been made illegal yet. That is the point of Luciano Arcaro.
@@marcuscleaver Thank you for replying , From what i understood from your response above is that the doctrine of indirect effect cannot be applied where it would give rise to criminal liability ?
Hi Marcus, I have recently struggled with this topic and it is what has come up for the exams, what is the approach if a member state passes a bill under which EU law would no longer have direct effect in the MS's legal system unless the MSParliament expressly provides for such direct effect on a case-by-case basis? I am very confused. Please help :'(
Thanks for sharing this video! I’ve a question about horizontal direct effect under (directives)- what are the exceptions that allow an individual to another individual relying on an EU directive?
Honestly the exceptions to Marshall v Southampton Health Authority are so few and far between they are hardly worth mentioning but if you're interested this article begins to explain the exceptions: www.keepcalmtalklaw.co.uk/foster-care-rethinking-horizontal-direct-effect-for-directives/
Hey, thank you so much for the explanation. I just got one question because I didnt follow the fact of indirect horizontal effect which goes through the court. Could you please tell me more about it? Thanks so much!
Hi mate, I just wanted to give some serious kudos for taking the time making these videos. Super helpful, sussinctly explained and just well put together. Thanks
+Darrick Garz Thanks Darrick, really appreciate you taking the time to comment.
six hours in the library and all I had to do was watch a 9-minute video to understand Direct effect. Thanks man, you saving careers !!
Got my EU exam coming up thank god I found this channel! I am going crazy ahah
Good luck with the exam!!!
So er done your exam
Did you pass it? mine is tommorow wish you the best :)
I just had a one hour lecture and did not understand anything ! And then came here to Marcus’ video and understood the topic in under 10mins! Thank you so much Marcus, you saved me from 1st year of uni !
So glad it was helpful!!
I came to thank you again for my 71 in EU law! This is the second time you help me getting firsts!! Thank you sir! 🌺
You are amazing. I had a 14 week EU Law class and these videos condensed almost all of it into a few hours. Direct effect was a concept that was more difficult to grasp, and you made it simple! I did well on my exam due in part to this video series. Thanks again!!
Thanks your explanations are so easy to follow both on this channel and in your podcast.
You are actually saving my life right now! You don't know how much you have helped me!
Thank you!!!
Exams next week. My tutor skimmed over vertical and horizontal in the PP so this is giving me the much needed explanation
Good luck in the exam!
You are a legend Marcus! well done, and thank you for taking your time to simplify the topics which come across complex!
+Nur You are welcome! Thanks for the nice comment!!
I have been reading about this all night and I didn’t understand a word. Two minutes into this video and I’ve learnt more than I have all night! Thank you!!
Thank you!!! have my EU exam in two days and this explained the difference between direct and indirect effect perfectly!
My exam in 2 weeks
Good luck with your exam
@@razwanaarshad4378 Thank you, the exam wasn't that bad if that puts your mind at ease, good luck to you too
I have an exam tomorrow and thank you very much for making this video. You are a gem and you will be in my prayers. A genuine thank you from a Brunel University student ❤️
All the best of luck in the world for tomorrow!! xoxoxo
This video helped me so much! I have an exam tomorrow and you saved me! Please do more videos about EU law!
Good luck in the exam!
Hey there Marcus
I just want to say a big thank you to you for your videos as they have helped me so much to pass my EU class.Not only are your videos easy to understand but you make so much effort to explain everything so well.You are a saviour.
Thanks for the lovely comment :)
Thank you for taking the time and making this video not sure if you are still active but thansk
Thank you very much for your effor put into all these EU law videos. Despite the fact I'm not from UK they were incredibly helpful when it comes to EU law exam! WELL DONE MARCUS!
Hi just wanted to comment to say thank you!! Your videos are an absolute life saver when it comes to understanding EU for my exams. Thank you!
I'm so glad they're helpful. Best of luck in your exams!
Dude, you are a life saver. Thank you SO much!
EU law exam on Tuesday and starting to panic, this is helping me to make sure i'm grasping the key principles, thanks :)
Good luck in the exam!! :D
thanks i think i did well :)
watched this before an EU law exam… you explained it to a point it actually made sense now 💗
You just cleared up indirect effect for me in 30 seconds! Thank you!!
Straight to the point, clear and understandable. You make EU law easier. Thanks for the work. Amazing.
+Aunt Babe Thanks for taking the time to comment! :)
I have an exam in a few hours on this and until now I have had no clue what this entire topic is about, even after hours watching and reading through the lecture & lecture notes, thank you so much :)
Great video ! I just want to point out that the conditions under the Van Gend en Loos 1963 decision (2:07) were actually decided by the Van Duyn 1974 decision
So glad to have found this channel! It has helped me so much :)
Thanks Nicola (:
You don't know how helpful you are. I hope you get everything you wish for. You're amazing
Thank you for this video! I was struggling to understand this topic for my upcoming exam and you made it so simple and straightforward! Cheers mate x
Amazing video as always, Marcus! Please do a Charter of Fundamental rights next, since its a regular question and it will be really helpful. Thankyou so much for uploading!
thanks again marcus, im currently rushing my HR assignment in the next few days and this has helped a lot.
We are all very grateful to you kind sir.
So helpful! Much better than my EU lecturer!
thanks for the videos - you are a big help in distilling all the material into what is relevant.
Thanks for this, didn't know about the Von Colson and Foster cases, just what I need
Thank you, thank you, thank you for this!! So helpful and clearly explained!
Thank you!!! Lifesaver! I feel so confident about my examination for EU LAW! Hoping for a good mark, with your helpful lectures I will definitely do well.
very good explanation ! your teaching abilities are to exploit. You are actually better at this than my university teacher is ...
THANK YOU SO MUCH! This information was so much clearer than my textbook !
you're so helpful! honestly if i could pay you the 9k instead of to my uni, i definitely would. Thank you!!!!!
Thanks for the video Marcus! You made the material interesting and easy to understand.
Thank you! Very much appreciated! :)
Marcus is a life saver.
Thank you so much mate, you’ve saved my EU lessons… I do wish that you could have been my instructor on this topic 😂😂 you are much much better than her…
God bless you for this!!
Thank you Marcus for simplifing this topic
really helpful!
i have a better understanding now, thank you
Great video well put together
Thanks so much for uploading!
+Kimmy G No worries! :)
Amazing video! Especially with the university strikes and the whole coronavirus situation, teaching at my law school has been very low quality with final year exams coming up in a week so this video was a life saver! Thank you so much!
Video super clear thank you for your help, keep it up.
literally the most helpful video
How have I only just came across you? Makes more sense now, thanks.
This was so helpful, thank you so much
Thank you so much it's really helpful easy to understand
This video was so helpful, nice and easy to understand. Thank you so much!
more than just helpful - pls carry on just this way
clearly explained, appreciated
Thank you very much it was very helpful as expected
These videos are great. The Boy Genius strikes again !
Thanks for the video! Isn't it Litster not Lister? 6:25
Quite right, I must have been thinking about Red Dwarf!
Nicely explained
So helpful, thank you!!!!
very clear, precise and subjective to understand. thanks
directives can have horizontal effect as well, by using the court system (which is an extension of the state) This is the way that Corina can take action against the state. if corina were to use Benus LTD she would using the court as an emanation of the state is obliged to abide by EU Law. Create the family for horizontal direct effect between individuals. (Cases Von Colson). if an individual want to have vertical direct effect and enforce their rights against the state i need to define what a state is (provides a public service and is under the control of the state can be considered an emo nation of the state Forster and British Gas) Venus LTD can be seen as providing a public service as it administers beauty treatments to individuals, while not under the BTTS it is still subject to Blacktown Council (as seen by it being shut down) so it can be considered a public service
Thank you very much for this video! Very helpful!
thanks, amazing content and clear elaborations/explanations :)
Thank you! This was very helpful. :)
Great video! Trully!
definitely the best explanation i have ever seen about the subject! thank you for the good work
Many thanks
Very helpful thanks a lot 🎉
nice and straightforward, thanks, this helped me out a great deal.
question: when it gets to indirect effect and the state has to interpret the EU law with MS law, how come it ever goes to state liability then, doesnt it just get inrepreted?? what are the reasons that indirect wouldnt work??
Thanks!!!
you're welcome!
THANK YOU
Thank you so much it was so useful!!
Thanks for the video just wanted to know would a university count as a public body still researching and have'nt found a clear answer
Your a genius!!! wow your video makes EU look sooo easy.
ikr. i have exams in 14 hours and these videos might actually save me!
awesome :* this really helps me in my revision
Thanks for taking the time to comment, best of luck with the revision!! :D
thank you so much. can we have videos on the role played by the CJEU in reviewing the legality of the acts of the Union institutions?
Veshna Naidoo Appadoo there is already one for that under EU judicial review (arts 263 & 265) ;)
oh okay. thanks :D
Thank you!
Amazing videos! :D
Hello,I'm looking for an answer,can Spain prohibit another citizen of europe union to leave Spain just for a denuntion at the local authorities?
This was very helpful
you are innocently and adorably good.
I have a problem question that I have been struggling with. It is with regards to the usefulness of indirect effect as a legal doctrine in the enforcement of directives? Thank you
thank you very much, very helpful.
Thank you so much!
Hi could you do a video on the FCC case?
Excellent video, you might've just rescued the chances of getting my degree lol
you are amazing x x x
Thanks Stef xoxo
this is so great
Fantastic
In a nutshell under the 1972 European Communities Act places EU laws over and above those made and implemented in the UK with with both direct and indirect effect. The vertical and horizontal influences of each party and each law, regulation or treaty are interwoven now and cannot be clearly separated. Perhaps this is why 17.4 million people voted to leave the EU and have national parliamentary sovereignty back to what it was before Heath took the UK into Europe on the 1st of January 1973.
Altough i understand the fact that people want their sovereignty. It is perfectly defensible to say that the benefits of having an EU (free movement of people and goods, easier trading etc.) Should bring uniformity in legislation and therefore less sovereignty of the member states. In my opinion this is perfectly defensible.
wow thankyou so so so muchhhh xx
Hi ,
Thank you for the lecture videos they help a lot for exams
I would like to ask you what is the effect of indirect effect on criminal liability cases.I have read a paragraph in a book and it was talking about the case of Arcaro (1996) and also the case of Criminal Proceedings against luciano(2005) but i have not understand anything .
Say there is a directive that says I cannot wear a baseball cap inside. The UK fails to implement it in time so it is not actually illegal. It would then be unfair to prosecute me for something that has not actually been made illegal yet. That is the point of Luciano Arcaro.
@@marcuscleaver Thank you for replying ,
From what i understood from your response above is that the doctrine of indirect effect cannot be applied where it would give rise to criminal liability ?
Yeah pretty much. Especially where it results in retrospectivity.
@@marcuscleaveryour work on youtube is highly appreciated .Keep it up :)
Hi Marcus,
I have recently struggled with this topic and it is what has come up for the exams, what is the approach if a member state passes a bill under which EU law would no longer have direct effect in the MS's legal system unless the MSParliament expressly provides for such direct effect on a case-by-case basis?
I am very confused. Please help :'(
Thanks
Thanks for sharing this video! I’ve a question about horizontal direct effect under (directives)- what are the exceptions that allow an individual to another individual relying on an EU directive?
Moe Othman yes please explain this! Thanks so much
Honestly the exceptions to Marshall v Southampton Health Authority are so few and far between they are hardly worth mentioning but if you're interested this article begins to explain the exceptions: www.keepcalmtalklaw.co.uk/foster-care-rethinking-horizontal-direct-effect-for-directives/
Can anyone explain to me what directives are?
Hi, What if a Supreme Court disregards EU law ?
Hey, thank you so much for the explanation. I just got one question because I didnt follow the fact of indirect horizontal effect which goes through the court. Could you please tell me more about it? Thanks so much!