What is the difference between Directives, Regulations and Decisions?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 เม.ย. 2017
  • This video gives a quick outline of the different legislative acts (Directives, Regulations and Decisions) used by the EU and highlights the main differences between them.
    For more information on the EU and its institutions please subscribe to our channel.
    In this series we explain complex aspects of the EU in a comprehensive and understandable way. If however, despite our diligence and help of Dr. Jan Oster, we have left something out or made a mistake, please be so kind to tell and forgive us.
    --------------------------------------------------
    With Ciceroni we seek to be a guide to European culture and history. We make videos on little known subjects as well as more ubiquitous ones, ranging from current affairs like the European Union, to historic events like the Tulip Mania, and even mythological stories like those of the Greek Gods. In all these videos we strive to present the subjects in a objective manner and within their complex context.
    Become a Patron: / ciceroni
    Follow us on Twitter: / ciceroni_eu
    Like us on Facebook: / ciceronichan. .

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @snufkin84
    @snufkin84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I like the fact that the UK arrow at 1min30sec just drops off the edge of the picture and does not reach the goal :))

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha, thanks for noticing ;)

  • @shinichi8213
    @shinichi8213 7 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Thank you for making these videos. As a European politics student its great to get this information in a visual format and in an easy to understand manner!
    Keep up the good work!
    Edit: On a more superficial note: In order to attract more viewers you should consider changing the background of your videos. Your animations are clear and simple, just like they should be, but the background is quite off putting in my opinion, and you could surely use a more streamlined background design.

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thanks for the compliment, we are glad you enjoy it. Feel free to share it with other students ;)
      And thanks for the advice, We'll look into that :)

    • @tomwakita4484
      @tomwakita4484 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Blue Incal i

  • @headcanon6408
    @headcanon6408 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    2:31 I can’t wait to see a decision that applies only to buildings in Poland, male businessmen in the Lyon area, and entirety of Austria

  • @ronweasley4096
    @ronweasley4096 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    U did what my teacher couldnt do in two weeks or Im stupid but your video helped, thanks!

  • @timh97sg1
    @timh97sg1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Lovely videos! Especially the ones explaining the institutions were very helpful. However, I was hoping you'd elaborate more on the nature of EU law here - the supremacy and autonomy of EU law, the direct and indirect effect, the direct applicability ... This is what the EU law is about and what people don't understand

    • @timh97sg1
      @timh97sg1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And also you forgot to mention that directives are not necessarily binding for all member states, and that it's forbidden to "translate" regulations into the national legislation

    • @ww12tt
      @ww12tt 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you are still uncertain (or ever was) on those topics, then i can warmly recommend "European law, by Robert Schütze"

  • @Koopa126
    @Koopa126 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That's some good education on how the legislative acts work. Thanks.

  • @sheenapalanivelu9168
    @sheenapalanivelu9168 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank You so much for this video! As an international student, I was pretty confused about this entire concept. Now its much clear :) Cheers!

  • @floppy2553
    @floppy2553 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you for these clear, helpful videos. Helped me a lot in my studies much love from Finland!

  • @anshukumar5948
    @anshukumar5948 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow... It's really very simple explanation.thanks!

  • @matthewjones1949
    @matthewjones1949 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for such an educational channel.

  • @c11able
    @c11able 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice explanation :) The difference was clearly explained and I understood very well. Thank you

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for watching and for you compliments. It's very much appreciated. :)

  • @kam5757
    @kam5757 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great vid.

  • @Tommuli_Haudankaivaja
    @Tommuli_Haudankaivaja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks, didn't need to search my whole book for the answer.

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad we could help!

  • @cristianz858
    @cristianz858 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about Council Decisions like the Prüm one? Do they work in the same way as the Commission Decisions you mention in the video?

  • @carloxd8983
    @carloxd8983 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice

  • @callmedani5061
    @callmedani5061 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hahaha love how the UK just completely misses the directive goal.
    Nice, subtle detail!

  • @gargipravinkubde6795
    @gargipravinkubde6795 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot.....I got clarification about the difference between all 3 terms

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad we could help :)

  • @nikhilp9994
    @nikhilp9994 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @datnguyenthe8300
    @datnguyenthe8300 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    1:28 Britain xDDD LOL

  • @riverloddon
    @riverloddon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cicero tells of the rule of Roman style law handed down from 1st to the current 4th Holy Roman empire. But don't ever forget the history of absolute power and murder and mayhem perpetrated by all the previous incantations.

  • @oldskoolloner
    @oldskoolloner 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question how would a hypothetical regulations /directives be repealed?

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How do you mean? After it has been passed?
      In such a case I would assume a new legislative procedure would be followed with a bill that cancels the existing law.

  • @jervylim9250
    @jervylim9250 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    can you make videos about how to fix EU? what is the future? and any updates.

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Maybe in the future we'll make a video with some ideas for improvement, but for now we simply aim to objectively explain aspects of the EU, pointing out both negative and positive sides in the process. How do you think it should be fixed?

    • @josephdavis1704
      @josephdavis1704 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you're assuming the EU is bad yet the structure of the EU has allowed European countries to surpass larger nations with more resources-such as the USA, Russia, India, Brazil, Nigeria, and China in terms of quality of life

  • @Wildboy789789
    @Wildboy789789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Directives are a very good idea... it sets a common goal without taking your freedom, i wish the usa did that with states

    • @robertjarman3703
      @robertjarman3703 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It can do that, but normally because Congress doesn't have that much direct authority over domestic matters, it has to make funding tied to this and has to set the tax rates rather high, so many things have very strange effects.

  • @user-cd4bx6uq1y
    @user-cd4bx6uq1y ปีที่แล้ว +1

    European political drama TV series when

  • @bijoubijoux5185
    @bijoubijoux5185 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Music is distracting, but thanks!

  • @WomanofSubstance
    @WomanofSubstance 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    God bless this video 🥰

  • @kudze3427
    @kudze3427 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:37 Lithuania

  • @vincentjacobsson3981
    @vincentjacobsson3981 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it should be investigated if the European Union now and then is legislated with the Bible written as a story. The word immunity (Latin immunitas, freedom from obligations to the state) comes from a religious revelation from the middle ages, most likely from a pope to become lawless, and which has since been rewritten into full immunity, personal and functional immunity (legally, cannot be prosecuted for criminal act) to the kings (head of state), presidents, and prime ministers, for law decisions and actions. The political exploitation of the vital ecosystem has now led to forest death (force majeure) and how will it affect people's economy, etc.

  • @sackeshi
    @sackeshi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We need an EU equivalent for the americas

    • @alexturlais8558
      @alexturlais8558 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sackeshi Productions Dude, its existed for 200 years. Its called the United States.

    • @OpinionesDeJACCsOpinions
      @OpinionesDeJACCsOpinions 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Doubt it'll ever happen! The Organization of American States is the closest thing that we are getting, even so OAS behaves a lot like the UN, than the EU.

  • @jervylim9250
    @jervylim9250 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Well to be honest, I am not good in politics. I think that if everybody became very open and accepting to their family around Europe, integration would have been easy. Aside from Economic Union and Monetary Union, they should proceed with full integration with the likes of Banking Union, Fiscal and Taxation Union, and Eventually Political Union. They should also make a treaty of becoming a union of perpetuity where in no secession from the union/ federation/ confederation. They should democratically elect thier leaders in all branches of the union. Individual Prime Minister/ President / Chancellor will only somewhat act like a Governor in their State. Foreign Affairs, Military, and Future Planning and Direction should be controlled by the EU President.
    I don't know. What do you think? I'm no expert.

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      We also are no experts, but I think you point out quite nicely what a big part of the problem is. Some want more integration, while others want to keep as much power as possible with the individual states. These mixed wishes led to the situation we are in now, with only some things organised on the EU level, which, as we have seen, can lead to difficulties in some cases and in competition/selfish behaviour in others. Whether or not a proper federal system is desirable depends mostly on a person's opinion, but I think most can agree that it would probably be a lot more efficient and effective.

  • @leakekse2768
    @leakekse2768 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why the music? Its so distracting. No one’s here for entertainment really so that was not needed

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  ปีที่แล้ว

      None at all? It seems very silent in the background without anything. However, sometimes we made it too loud, I agree:)

  • @letsgoBrandon204
    @letsgoBrandon204 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3:13 "...because the EU should stay out of the business of member states as much as possible..." HA! that's hilarious 😆

    • @robertjarman3703
      @robertjarman3703 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's hard to pass a law like this without the consent of a member state's executive government. Even when Council unanimity is not needed, they still need a qualified majority and they tend to avoid passing a decision without unanimity or very close to it.

  • @johnnyuchiha6449
    @johnnyuchiha6449 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    BREEEEEXIT :) BYE BYE EU!!!!

  • @hammerblack1859
    @hammerblack1859 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unelected officials

    • @Ciceroni1
      @Ciceroni1  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The video is about the different forms of EU law, almost all new laws have to be approved by Parliament and The Coucil. Parliament is directly elected through European elections, so no unelected officials there. The Council represent the governments of the Member States, they are all elected (indirectly) in national elections. Only the Commission is filled with unelected officials, just like the civil servants of national governments. Just to check, were you talking about the Commission? Or something else?:)

    • @robertjarman3703
      @robertjarman3703 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ciceroni1 Add that the Commission is also nominated by the Council by qualified majority, approved by the Parliament, well, the president is by the council, and the Parliament has more power over the rest of the commission, and can also remove them at will by a 2/3 vote.