Thanks for the great dyno comparison between the S1000RR and M1000RR! I am waiting for my M1000RR and your video of the wider power band, confirmed that I did a good choice for the racetrack!!!
If you don't respect the bikes, bikes doesn't respect you! Do you want to crash the gear with this rear tyre chattering? It's the perfect way to damage every bike. You did this thing, not only one time, but over and over again.
I want to install a full System Akra Evo Line too. Did you have check engine light after installing it because of the Sensors in the Exhaust? Greetings from Germany
its not all about the extra power. The M has far superior suspension and brakes than the S. Also it should've ran the stock exhaust for a direct comparison. How many miles had the M ran before being strapped to the dyno?
He says 500miles or something. Both have akra full system. Did u watch the video? The brakes are not far superior. It is the same nissin callipers which comes with the cbr rrr
Imho, the graph at 8:20 with power vs. speed is kind of ridiculous. showing the rpm would be more useful information. Plus the red power curve, the M1000rr is only more powerful at the very top end literally the last, maybe, 1000 rpm????? Somethings off here!
Looks like it wasn't tied down hard enough and was tripping the traction control? Certainly the jumping around wasn't great. I'm just not sure how it sees slip if the front isn't moving. Maybe it just looks for spikes in wheel speed?
TC was off. We first tried out what worked with the S and once that was done we wanted to replicate this to the M, but same pressure and strapping would unfortunately not hold it. So you are indeed right. But if it is 5, 7 or 8 hp is hard to tell. Mileage is also a factor. Bike is now Bren tuned and will be back soon
We got a few clean runs but had to let out air and strap it hard. Problem was we wanted to strap them equal and with same pressure to get a fair result, but unfortunately this did not work out.
The m package pricing should piss any of the previous owners off since they had to spend over a grand to fix the dead spot then they push out a bike over 30 grand that resolves the issue a damn shame
Lighter internals arent gonna do much more in peak/overall hp, its just lets it get there faster, u may gain 2-4hp at best unless u go higher on rpm...so really no surprise...
LOVE IT! BUT WHY GOD WHY!!! would u use km/t and not RPMs per HP 🥲🥲 all those special engine mods and carbonfiber wheels 😅😅 we need to see HP/RPM not HP/KMT
We did our best effort to get an ignition pickup, but on this bike it is a nightmare access because of the tight space and the time constraint we had. We could probably also have set rpm by roll speed to get close, but we will be back.
@@slick25cards48 I have a 2010 with brentune stage 3, it’s a known fact in the s1000rr community that you can’t reach 200 rwhp with 91-93 octane pump fuel on a first gen without engine mods. (Or boost) Unless you are talking about a race fuel map file then you can get around 200rwhp on the 2010 but VP fuel is like 180$ for 20 litres. My BT stage 3 put down 185 rwhp on 91 octane Shell (4 hp gains over stock ecu map + custom tuned PCV) Although there was a lot of torque gains in the low, mid & high rpm over the stock mapping
![[ASMR] BMW S1000RR exhaust l [AustinRacing Full system] sound clip](/img/n.gif)
Time stamps:
What you came for: 4:06
Flames: 6:23
Results and chart: 7:34
Thanks for the great dyno comparison between the S1000RR and M1000RR! I am waiting for my M1000RR and your video of the wider power band, confirmed that I did a good choice for the racetrack!!!
Yes, this is easy to underestimate. Congratulations on your purchase!
Pretty cool video man! Keep them coming!
Most honest clip i have seen in while
😎😎😎😎😎😎
Thank you! 😎
@@RhabdoRacing the smile's dont lie ;)
hopefully i will have one next year
The rear bleeding sound is so sweet
Every dyno is different. This is for sure one on the high side.
So is the bikes. So good they had a couple of bikes to measure the differences with right?
There is a lot more potential in the M with good tuning and exhaust.
not needed yet ,
Great video! ♥️💯
M is said to have lighter internal components' engine, which lets it revs quicker. Surely better tuning perspectives to expect from this M version ✨🙃
Nice one 🔥
Thank you
Great video, thx. :-)
Najs gutta 😁💯👍
Thanks😄
If you don't respect the bikes, bikes doesn't respect you! Do you want to crash the gear with this rear tyre chattering? It's the perfect way to damage every bike. You did this thing, not only one time, but over and over again.
We love you too. Thank you for watching
💪💪💪 awsome
Different gears at the comparison graph?
The final drive on the bikes are not the same and we unfortunately did not have rpm pick up. New dyno video coming with M RCK race ECU coming up
@@RhabdoRacing but it was 5 gear?
We tried all gears, the overlays i believe is 4th
@@RhabdoRacing thanks!
I want to install a full System Akra Evo Line too. Did you have check engine light after installing it because of the Sensors in the Exhaust? Greetings from Germany
This is no problem. The exhaust come with a servo motor block off kit. So no check engine light
did u changed exhast cause this exhast looks differnt from the stocck (on m1000rr)
Yes both bikes has same top of the line Akrapovic Evolution full.
@@RhabdoRacing ok thanks for everything (video/response to my comment)
its not all about the extra power. The M has far superior suspension and brakes than the S. Also it should've ran the stock exhaust for a direct comparison.
How many miles had the M ran before being strapped to the dyno?
He says 500miles or something. Both have akra full system. Did u watch the video? The brakes are not far superior. It is the same nissin callipers which comes with the cbr rrr
@@pravesh736 I've ridden both the S and the M. I prefer the M brakes to the Hayes calipers used on the S.
@@davidgreenop9978 yes, those callipers are not bad but not the best either. Hayes suck
@@pravesh736 In the USA both bikes have the same calipers now. But lots of people love the Hayes
Skikkelig rått 👍💪💪
Wow
9:47, you put on a full exhaust and didn't tune it?
Correct. This was a baseline pull, and we had afr readings that was not far off to be honest.
Bike has wideband sensors
Imho, the graph at 8:20 with power vs. speed is kind of ridiculous. showing the rpm would be more useful information. Plus the red power curve, the M1000rr is only more powerful at the very top end literally the last, maybe, 1000 rpm????? Somethings off here!
My 2023 m1000rr with remap. Full system gets 206hp at back tyre
We now have the alpha Race ECU and it is very close to this number. 201 on a slick tyre. And that sucks up about 10 hp compared to a dot tire
I expecting more in M 1000!
Something isn’t right in your test results
Looks like it wasn't tied down hard enough and was tripping the traction control? Certainly the jumping around wasn't great. I'm just not sure how it sees slip if the front isn't moving. Maybe it just looks for spikes in wheel speed?
TC was off. We first tried out what worked with the S and once that was done we wanted to replicate this to the M, but same pressure and strapping would unfortunately not hold it. So you are indeed right. But if it is 5, 7 or 8 hp is hard to tell. Mileage is also a factor. Bike is now Bren tuned and will be back soon
Look at the rpms
you have a full exhaust?
Both bikes have Akrapovic Evolution full
Rev limit m1000rr ?
15100 RPM
Would think its all over the place the way the back wheel was bouncing
We got a few clean runs but had to let out air and strap it hard. Problem was we wanted to strap them equal and with same pressure to get a fair result, but unfortunately this did not work out.
Tighten the damn bike down more! You can't get accurate results with the thing bouncing off the roller
What octane fuel?
98 ron
Vent… NORGE?! M1000rr!🥲
Jepp😁
The m package pricing should piss any of the previous owners off since they had to spend over a grand to fix the dead spot then they push out a bike over 30 grand that resolves the issue a damn shame
All bikes are restricted these days, most on the top end. USA bound bikes are really restricted compared to bikes in Europe.
The base S1000RR is the better value, imho. For the money of the M model, I would rather take a V4R. Of course I'm not a racer nor a rich guy.
Dope 🔥 not much of a difference
That’s not necessarily true it’s like comparing a run of the mill Ducati V4 vs the V4R, wait until people start tuning these M models
Lighter internals arent gonna do much more in peak/overall hp, its just lets it get there faster, u may gain 2-4hp at best unless u go higher on rpm...so really no surprise...
@@clutchshot247 and it reduces stresses at high rpm, being less likely to throw a rod when letting out at 300km/h sure is worth something as well...
EU spec?
Yes
@@RhabdoRacing I expected more..
@@nickmatulakbarharahap6939 look at the rpms.
LOVE IT! BUT WHY GOD WHY!!! would u use km/t and not RPMs per HP 🥲🥲 all those special engine mods and carbonfiber wheels 😅😅 we need to see HP/RPM not HP/KMT
We did our best effort to get an ignition pickup, but on this bike it is a nightmare access because of the tight space and the time constraint we had. We could probably also have set rpm by roll speed to get close, but we will be back.
@@RhabdoRacing noted 😆 plz yes 🥰
BMW M1000 RR Hase bone stock
198 Hp at the wheel
No, it’s like 140 rwhp on 650ib’s dyno test video , that’s before the ecu was flashed
Bmw 1000rr 2010 200 horsepower
@@slick25cards48 no.
@@KGRR-us9ie yes, brentunning flash
@@slick25cards48 I have a 2010 with brentune stage 3, it’s a known fact in the s1000rr community that you can’t reach 200 rwhp with 91-93 octane pump fuel on a first gen without engine mods.
(Or boost)
Unless you are talking about a race fuel map file then you can get around 200rwhp on the 2010 but VP fuel is like 180$ for 20 litres.
My BT stage 3 put down 185 rwhp on 91 octane Shell
(4 hp gains over stock ecu map + custom tuned PCV)
Although there was a lot of torque gains in the low, mid & high rpm over the stock mapping
You make a dyno on a 500km bike ? Not good..............
Yes. We run in the motor for maximum performance, not maximum longevity
I could do a full top end rebuild with ported head on a normal s1000rr and still save money over buying the stock m1000rr.