Bridging Action Research and the Scientific Method

Deep Dive Podcast: Bridging Action Research and the Scientific Method
The intersection of action research and the scientific method reveals surprising commonalities despite their perceived differences. Here are 5 key takeaways from an in-depth exploration of their relationship:
1️⃣ Shared Goals of Understanding: Both action research and the scientific method aim to generate knowledge that addresses real-world problems. Their methodologies may differ, but their purpose of contributing to progress aligns.
2️⃣ Iterative Learning Process: Action research and the scientific method emphasize iterative processes, allowing researchers to refine hypotheses and solutions over time. This adaptability ensures relevance in dynamic environments.
3️⃣ Engagement with Stakeholders: Action research uniquely involves active collaboration with participants, while the scientific method often maintains a more observational role. Despite this difference, both prioritize accuracy and meaningful results.
4️⃣ Complementary Strengths: Action research’s practical focus complements the rigor of the scientific method. Together, they offer a holistic approach to addressing complex challenges in organizational and social contexts.
5️⃣ Practical Implications for Organizations: Leveraging both methodologies can enhance organizational problem-solving. Integrating these approaches fosters innovation and creates actionable, evidence-based solutions.
The synergy between action research and the scientific method provides powerful tools for impactful change. How do you balance practicality and rigor in your problem-solving approaches?
Get article: Aguinis, H. 1993. Action research and scientific method: Presumed discrepancies and actual similarities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29(4): 416- 431. doi.org/10.117...