Walden on Gandhi (BBC 1998)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ธ.ค. 2012

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @williamvorkosigan5151
    @williamvorkosigan5151 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brian Walden as greatly missed. His Waldon on Heroes series is excellent. It is a shame that they are not all out there in good condition.

  • @kwaka903
    @kwaka903 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A truly Great Man...

    • @AndroidAmI
      @AndroidAmI 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Walden, yes. Gandhi, no.

    • @davidkennedy6251
      @davidkennedy6251 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      AndroidAml
      No human being is ever perfect but Gandhi was a truly remarkable human being.

  • @doddanand
    @doddanand 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Walden provides a balanced view of the Mahatma. The world did not understand Gandhi during his time and still hasn't. Walden partly explains this when he says that Gandhi cannot be understood in terms of political craft rather he is better understood from a moralistic standpoint. The problem with (if one can call it a problem) Gandhi is he defies our compartmentalizations of roles - Lincoln was a great statesman, Christ and Buddha were great saints, etc but what was Gandhi. He was a prophet, politician, leader of the masses, idealist, reformer, etc all rolled into one.
    I am personally convinced of the following: If Gandhi doesn't appear good to you, you have a lacuna. Try to search for it and elevate yourself to a point where you can gain the capacity to understand this great man. Following his ideals comes next.

    • @ow4744
      @ow4744 ปีที่แล้ว

      People are so keen to elevate themselves by having a contrary view - they waste time on foibles.
      Or, they miss the point - yes, he may have had some utopian views that were practically unworkable (e.g on economics). But he wasn't an economist. He was a moral visionary who attempted to put that vision into practice in the real world, and to lead by example. In doing so he added greatly to the good in the world.

  • @lucianopavarotti2843
    @lucianopavarotti2843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I bought into the Attenborough-Gandhi legend until I saw some of his letters to Hitler.

    • @robin231176
      @robin231176 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Did you actually read those letters? If you had done, you would not have made this superficial, keyboard warrior comment.

    • @lucianopavarotti2843
      @lucianopavarotti2843 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robin231176 In one letter from 23 July 1939 he addresses Hitler as 'friend' and then begs his 'forgiveness' if he offended Hitler by writing,. He claims Hitler is the only person who can "prevent" war, failing to mention that only Hitler wanted war. It was a creepy crawly letter. He wrote again in December 1940 after Hitler's attacks on Poland, Scandinavia, and France etc and still called Hitler "Friend" in which he covered his tracks and was more critical of Hilter but also spent most of the letter complaining about the British. Of course Ghandi also told Londoners being killed in their thousands during the Blitz to turn the other cheek to Hitler.

    • @robin231176
      @robin231176 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lucianopavarotti2843 Gandhi was making a desperate appeal for peace in the terms he best saw fit.

    • @lucianopavarotti2843
      @lucianopavarotti2843 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robin231176 A much over-rated man capable of grave errors, not the saint he made out to be. A more balanced view of him is necessary.

  • @jayd4ever
    @jayd4ever 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    what's the music

    • @11Kralle
      @11Kralle 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bach "Brandenburgische Konzerte" (don't know exactly which - there are six of them)

    • @salvatorecollura2692
      @salvatorecollura2692 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Number 5. First Movement.