The moment when Rob attempts to discuss the first century understanding of the English word eternal by referencing the Greek, Hebrew and rabbinic tradition of using the term is telling. It appears that Adrian Warnock isn’t familiar with this basic scholarship or knows that it poses a serious challenge to his “traditional” view. Instead of addressing the issue, he redirects. It seemed to me that both Warnock and the host cared more about labeling Rob’s views than understanding them. Rob is very patient and kind.
Good point here. The Greek and first century Hebrew texts reveal some meaning missed by English translations and we need to honestly look into this without just believing a doctrine because we’re told we have to. Bell is very well-informed and more than a match for this line of questioning.
Rob says the parable of the rich man and Lazarus is more of a hijacking by Jesus of something popular purely for that timeframe, not a teaching and window into the future. I don't think confining Jesus's words to pure first century tradition gets to the root of the issue
Wow I must say..I watched this is 2013, and felt very much on the ‘side’ of the hosts. But now my 30 year old self is watching in some disbelief at the hostility and narrow mindedness of these questions. Rob displayed such grace, humility and courage. I may not agree with all his views but you can’t doubt that ‘God is Love’
““I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.”” - John 16:33
For those that find Rob Bell’s perspective a breath of fresh air I would recommend from a more Eastern Orthodox perspective Bradley Jersak’s “Her Gates Shall never be Shut” and a brilliant and compelling book written by David Bentley Hart entitled “that all shall be saved; heaven, hell and universal salvation”.
I have had zero interest in the Bible after 10 years out of Christian Ministry. I started reading Love Wins and read the Bible for the first time recently with genuine interest and excitement.
I’m so glad I came back to this confrontation. Originally I agreed with Justin and Adrian. But after years of diving into these types of debates and my own study - I’m a little shocked at how much Justin and Adrian were “telling” Rob what his fundamental beliefs were. I think they would have gotten much farther by first asking what Rob believes and entering into his questions with more thought on the meanings of things like “eternal,” “punishment,” or etc.
Totally disagree with you. Justin and Adrian read Bell's words in his book back to him - then recited what the Bible says - and then Bell either said nothing or minimized his heresy. Bell was clearly evasive (ie, did not defend) his heretical statements in his book.
Bryce Clemmer sure, but there is generally an element of truth in a joke. Additionally, the way a person jokes can reveal something about who they are-their character. I was just making an observation. I didn’t particularly care for Mr. Bell’s brand of joking. I found him snide and condescending for the most part. Perhaps he is arrogant and believes he is always the smartest guy in the room, or perhaps he is insecure and desperate to cover over his insecurities. I don’t know. Maybe it’s a bit of both or maybe it’s neither and I am way off. Either way, I found him to be obnoxious.
The most conservative and traditional belief of scripture is to love God, to love others, and even to love yourself. Beyond that, it's just commentary.
Rob Bell is apparently saying that in some cases the Koine Greek of the New Testament was mistranslated into English such that the original Greek does not mean the same thing as the English translation. He's apparently also claiming that in some cases the translation is accurate, but is misunderstood. For example, some exegetes claim that when Jesus said that the condemned will be cast into everlasting fire, he wasn't saying that the condemned will never be removed from the fire. He was merely saying the fire itself never goes out.
I love Rob Bell’s fresh prospective of God, and I also understand that he too is still searching and may not have everything figured out, as no one does and as no one will ever have everything figured out in regard to so many mysteries when it comes to God. As a former church attendee, let me tell you what this whole thing came down for me: yes, God is both a loving entity and simultaneously angry with sin. The church/pastors have focused too much ( at least the ones I’ve gone to) on the anger of God towards sin and not enough on the love of God towards humanity. Rob Bell is searching the loving aspects of God, he puts focus on that since, God knows we have enough- unhealthy so- focuse on the wrath and anger of God. And that’s what keeps me away from the church- the constant guilt lashing, anger preaching, emotional manipulation circling around how horrible we are and how much we have to constantly repent. The hosts are trying to be nice, versus Rob is being nice.
Rob Bell has a great debate style, he's not forcing anyone to believe what he believes he's just asking questions based on the bible verses themselves.
Rob is so good. This discussion/debate is needed as well. The living Bible is meant to be discussed and not swallowed whole. These convos are exactly how the message was spread from the jump. Both men get a tip o’ the cap. I lean towards Rob’s view rather than the potentially weaponizing view of Adrian.
I like how Rob goes into the context and meanings of words that we translate as "forever". Adrian was frustrating me when he was saying, "literal translation of scripture". I thought that analyzing the etymology, utility, and context of words IS literal translation. Rob frustrated me by continuously answering questions with questions.
I liked how Mr. Bell admitted, he is still learning. May that be a lesson to us all, to keep asking questions. Such humility! ... To dialogue, not merely to put others on trial. Of course, a real debate would have a moderator, and the moderator would be asking questions of both sides. Therefore, I felt Mr. Bell was free, here, to make his own rules.
Wow! This was amazing discourse. I was very grateful the disagreements were handled with mutual respect. Sometimes you could see it was hard to do. :) Its critically important to respectfully talk about our understanding of the Bible without eating each other alive. You 3 gave me a lot to think about. Many thanks, gentlemen. I hope I view other "Premier Christian Radio Videos" like this in the future. God bless you all!
Tim Keller has a brilliant article on hell that cuts to the chase. Here's a portion: Some years ago I remember a man who said that talk about the fires of hell simply didn't scare him, it seemed too far-fetched, even silly. So I read him lines from C.S. Lewis: "Hell begins with a grumbling mood, always complaining, always blaming others . . . but you are still distinct from it. You may even criticize it in yourself and wish you could stop it. But there may come a day when you can no longer. Then there will be no you left to criticize the mood or even to enjoy it, but just the grumble itself, going on forever like a machine. It is not a question of God 'sending us' to hell. In each of us there is something growing, which will BE Hell unless it is nipped in the bud." To my surprise he got very quiet and said, "Now that scares me to death." He almost immediately began to see that hell was a) perfectly fair and just, and b) something that he realized he might be headed for if he didn't change. We run from the presence of God and therefore God actively gives us up to our desire (Romans 1:24, 26.) Hell is therefore a prison in which the doors are first locked from the inside by us and therefore are locked from the outside by God (Luke 16:26.) Every indication is that those doors continue to stay forever barred from the inside. Though every knee and tongue in hell knows that Jesus is Lord (Philippians 2:10-11,) no one can seek or want that Lordship without the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:3.This is why we can say that no one goes to hell who does not choose both to go and to stay there. What could be more fair than that?
Remarkable answer. It comes in perfect time for me to teach my 15-year-old daughter about the conscious of sin. Thank you for sharing. Can't wait to read the book.
Something more I'd like to add. This comment from you has led me to think that we are, as Christians, brothers, and sisters in Crist, no matter where we are. We share a common faith and we resist the evil of the world which, quite often, comes with sophisticated disguises. So, I just want to thank you again for your post because somehow it gave me strength in a moment of weakness and doubts.
I love Tim Keller (and C.S. Lewis), but I feel this concept of locking the doors from the inside only works in theory (and I say that as someone who used to preach this exact message). I can imagine people rebelling / rejecting God AT FIRST. I can see them locking those doors from the inside for a few months, a few years-MAYBE even a few decades… But ETERNITY? Is it feasible to believe that 100% of the people that wind up in hell will continue to reject God and NOT seek repentance? A 24-year-old born in the wrong country? A 40-year-old who's spent their entire life being manipulated, hurt, betrayed by “church” folk? A 50-year-old who tried to stay faithful, but lost everything (much like Job), but never had their moment where God speaks from a whirlwind? OR as Rob Bell aptly questions… would God continue to punish a 17-year-old for the choices they made in those short 17 years of life… for ETERNITY? Can a developing mind truly carry enough HUBRIS to last FOREVER? This great God who created the universe, time, space, and conquered death… Can't figure a way to soften the heart of a 17-year-old? How can an “omnipotent” God be so impotent?
From what I can tell, Rob Bell is challenging people to think critically of their relationship with God. I think for the most part, the people who are trying to defame him aren’t wanting to do that. If you have a relationship with God, then we shouldn’t fear the thought of “Is my relationship with God genuine?”
@@MaxMax-ib6xg thanks for asking. Yes I still am doing that. It started way back when I married my wife 33 years ago. I was vehemently against anyone who lived a gay lifestyle. Then I met my wife who lived a lesbian lifestyle for 7 years before that. My paradigms started to blow up back then. It’s been quite a journey with God since then.
It seems like Rob makes controversial statements in his books and videos, but when challenged on them he is vague and hesitant. I think that says a lot about the solidity of his claims.
The belief that everyone is going to Heaven. It is one of the most damaging ideas in modern times because it removes the necessary sense of urgency in earnestly seeking our salvation
Thats the thing that everyone is seeming to miss though. Bell never sought out to make any objective claims, he only says that our traditional view of hell may not be the certain truth, and then presents other alternative theory's.
@@GameCrawler but he refuses to say which alternative theory he believes is correct or even what one he thinks is more likely to be so. Where is the scholarship in saying "this view might not be right, there are these other views..."? We know the alternative theologies/thoughts on Hell already. They aren't new. He revels in creating this ambiguity, he can't hide his grin when ppl are frustrated by his evasion when he is asked his personal view on the matter. If he is responsible for the spiritual "health" of his flock he should be wary of teaching false doctrine. Ppls souls could be in jeopardy. Either he doesn't care, or he does care, but doesn't think anyone's souls are actually in danger. If the latter is true, (and I trust it is,) then why not just say it?
"Repent for the Kingdom of heaven is at hand" What do you think this means if it is not a warning. "The ax is already at the root of the tree, if you do not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire." It does not say you will be taken out of the fire if you repent later.
Yes there are some clear verses that seem to make your point, but there and others that might seem to contradict it. This is no clear issue as to the precise nature of hell. All verses from Genesis to Revelation have to be considered as it is a long unfolding narrative in the Bible. "Four Views on Hell Paperback - January 6, 1997" and the second edition are a great start to see the broader narrative.
@@MarkMetternichPhotographyLLC There are no verses tjat contradict it. Refer to them if you can? Hell is a state more than a place. You are not sent there, you end up there. It is your own attitude. It is not a punishment it is a consequence.
Meta Space Crowned By Time john is talking specifically to the jews about christ being revealed ... its specific to the jews with reference to the tree producing fruit ref as in prophecy in isaiah ... not meant for us... christ revealed himself to the jews first then his death n rez included gentiles... anything else from that scripture is proof texting... repent literally means change your mind!
Meta Space Crowned By Time I gave you a pretty good primer book that lays out the different perspectives on “hell”’s more precise nature. I studied the subject very extensively from all the main perspectives and from the best advocates of those positions and YES, there is a Gehenna (valley of Ben Hinnom) Sheol, Hades, Tartarus, Abaddon... described in hundreds of verses in the Bible, each having a variety of implications and unfolding meanings related to the nature of the finally impenitent wicked’s destination. Yes there are consequences to hating or avoiding Gods Love, and relationship. But it’s precise nature is not clear. Some aspects of it seem so, but others not, when one dives deep into the subject comprehensively. I’m not a Universalist and I don’t think Rob is (but not entirely sure) and part of my intensive, over a year study had Robs book come up as a position to read. A very theologically trained friend who was not a Universalist recommended it to me. I did not want to read it due to not being interested in something that might be even remotely Universalist, but I read it (most of it) and found it VERY interesting (particularly the great questions!) and it created a significant spike of Love, compassion, kindness, goodness... The Fruit of the Spirit... in my life, notably. After giving it a fair shake, I believe the book has a lot of truth in it, and it is recommended if a person wants to look at all the issues and angles related to the important topic. But no, it did not make me change what I see as the strongest case. One study showed me is that (a lot like eschatology!) people that think the issue is open and shut clear, simply are not looking unbiased at all the Bible says on the matter. Nor carefully considering the genre’s of literature and the full view of the entire narrative. If you have not given the subject a thorough investigation from all perspectives, I highly recommend it.
Jake Vezeau Pretty close here. Metanoia is two words that literally mean “mind change” and “afterward”. Or, to “think differently - afterward.” It also implies heart change with the different thinking/afterward. Original Biblical thinking does not separate a mind change from a heat change. They are integrally connected. There are also many types of “metanoia.” They are not all weeping in sackcloth and ashes like you see more in the Old Testament (because Messiah had yet to come and do His redeeming work). After praying to God one could be touched by God and not help but to “think differently afterward” about how awesome God is, and of course that would result in a natural transformation of ones heart and create joy”! Also about the fruit... that is not entirely true. In the Bible the Tree/Bush/Vine/Branch/Fruit is a extremely long developing narrative that starts in Genesis 1 and is echoed through all the letters even to the end of Revelation. In ancient biblical thinking/narrative tree, vine, fruit, branch are all forms of Tree. Aside from God and Humans it is a motif or design pattern used more than any other living thing in all of scripture. The vine, tree, fruit of the vine and so forth represent God Himself Who is Eternal Life and being plugged into Him. The general clear idea is that if someone genuinely comes to Christ/God and genuinely believes into Gods grace gift of Himself/eternal life/forgiveness/Love... God comes into us, we come into him and that is transformative. No way around that. God in-dwells the believer (belief changes heart) and there is no way out of the fact that good fruit, transformation, thinking differently afterward will naturally occur and grow in us. In other words, if years are going by and the fruit of the spirit is not growing in our lives, we might want to double check the authenticity of our faith in Jesus. So maybe I am misunderstanding you, but just belief does not get us in. It is a genuine belief that has transformation built in.
Is it wrong that Rob would have the other person think for themselves and give honest consideration? What means more to you, what one other person insists, or what your honest thoughts think? Therefor, Rob seeks to offer the most meaningful discussion. It's easy enough to not think about, and just assume and insist Rob is wrong; but to think about it for ourselves prevents simple assumption and stokes self-honesty.
@@sammiezook I don't get where you are coming from. The questions let one consider God and Scripture, which is a better more enlightening means of discussion than personal claims. I can't relate to the accusation that Rob was shifty, I see zero merit to that.
Rob is pretty well known for being a kind of sage, who pitches the question back, often rephrasing it to challenge the inquirer to consider it more deeply. He has a talent for forcing his students to more deeply consider their questions, often empowering them to derive their own answers, or even open their eyes to their preconceptions and biases inherent in the question. He has a gift, but it wasn't useful in this discussion.
@@yourfavoritesteve How was it not useful? Seems he was able to put listeners in place to consider possibilities which they have been trained to never consider lest they be deemed heretics, and kept the focus on God and Scripture. Justin and Adrian were trying to focus on Rob and his doctrine, but Rob kept it about Scripture and God. The important question is what may be true; it's not so important what Rob's own doctrinal stance is. Looks like most viewers want Rob to simply say something they can accuse as heresy, but would that have been more helpful to anyone? Is there something I am missing here? What would have been more useful to the discussion? (I know the technical aspects that fully clarify the matter, and if you ask I'll gladly tell, but I don't think Rob had that full technical understanding so he couldn't share it. I would love to discuss it with Rob on a livestream, could help people see exactly what Scripture actually teaches, which is VERY Good News indeed)
@Barkoot Geleta Nor Per-se, I believe in what the Bible says about predestined, but I don't believe people have been predestined to go to a lost eternity.
I’m Jewish and I was never threatened with Hell or enticed by Heaven. An Evangelical Christian asked me if I was going to. Heaven or Hell. I didn’t know if Jews believed Hell existed.
Me in 2011: Rob Bell is straying from orthodoxy and is on the verge of dangerous ground... Me in 2020: Rob Bell hadn’t quite gotten free of toxic religion yet, but he is on the verge of holy ground...
If you guest refuses to present clear answers about his opinion, kick him out, there is no need to hear endless question without a few attempts of answers
Rob repeatedly reflects the questions, saying, "Well, do you?". It doesn't matter what I think, Rob, you're the one who wrote a book about this and you're the one who needs to answer the questions clearly.
The host quoted his rhetorical questions within the book… it’s to ponder on the answer and to have discussions about them. He doesn’t have the answer hence why he asks “Well, do you?” because neither do they.
@@rutakassa5631 The whole point of a rhetorical question is that the answer is obvious- not that there isn't one. Even though he doesn't give an answer, he certainly has a bias and a worldview shaping his thoughts.
@@genessapanainte2609 Hmm I disagree. The whole point of a rhetorical question is to make a point… the obvious answer is that there isn’t one, hence why he continues to respond with “Well, do you?” because the host and co-guest don’t know either.
So discovered a few years ago now, so refreshing, freeing from some of the religious Christian beliefs. I am a follower of Christ and actually feel more free now after reading and listening to Rob Bell, who is on tour in the UK this year. I've got my ticket.
@@trentbridenpiano Do you mean these guys are trying to trick Rob as did those with Jesus? Rob does well in a monologue, but as soon as someone challenges his position everything comes tumbling down. No, Jesus didn't answer questions like this.
The problem among us Christians is that we categorise each other depending on not just the church we belong to but also political views. There are far too many “christianists” who believe in all sorts of “christianism” instead of just being humble believers in and followers of Jesus Christ.
That just about everyone is going to Heaven. It is one of the most damaging ideas in modern times because it removes the necessary sense of urgency in earnestly seeking our salvation - Watered down Christianity does not speak much about Hell. It does not warn souls of the danger they face - -"If men only knew what awaits them in eternity, they would do everything in their power to amend their lives" - "Among adults there are few saved because of sins of the flesh.... With the exception of those who die in childhood, most men will be damned"
I like your point! I think Jesus gets trampled in our polarization. Have you thought, perhaps Jesus is a moderate? I think, for example, because of the nature of the Ten Commandments' being ten, not nine or eleven (liberal or conservative), likely Jesus was a moderate. His Beatitudes, to me, are analogous to the Ten.
You can have whatever view you want, friend, but if it doesn't comport with the scriptures, then it is worthless and wrong. People don't like things that are black and white but God is very clear when he speaks and there is no equivocation in His truth.
Wow I must say..I watched this is 2013, and felt very much on the ‘side’ of the hosts. But now my 30 year old self is watching in some disbelief at the hostility and narrow mindedness of these questions. To think that people actually think that God will eternally punish a finite being for an infantile amount if time, is just sad. Rob displayed such grace, humility and courage. I may not agree with all his views but you can’t doubt that ‘God is Love’ - 1 John
I don't understand when the bible says thrown into the lake of fire for eternity??? People think they can subtract or add to the bible JUST to make themselves feel good. Revelation even warns of this. These type of people Jesus stated they were luke warm and he will spit them out. Hell is real and Jesus even said that MOST PEOPLE will go to Hell especially when he stated it's easier for a Camel to go through an eye of the needle than for a Rich man to get to Heaven. God Bless
So you interpret lukewarm as someone who is able to see some time durations as nonliteral? Lukewarm means sinful and carnal sir. Jonah was in the belly of the whale forever according to the Bible and yet got out in three days. By your logic, anybody who believes he did not stay in the whale forever literally is lukewarm and heading for hell
@@ajaxslamgoody9736 revelation is a spiritual book…we can not pick and choose what is literal and what is a spiritual metaphor…if the lake of fire is literal then so is everything else mentioned in that book, including the dragon. In the very first chapter of revelation it says these things are signified meaning they are symbols…If God condemned the act of burning people alive to Moloch and Baal…the. he most certainly condemns the teaching of eternal conscious torment.
I read about 1/2 of the book as part of a comprehensive study on "hell" and although I am not a Universalist (I doubt that Rob is one) the book absolutely did two GODLY things in me. It refreshingly broke some paradigm's I had and got me to start thinking more seriously and creatively about things I had been taught in the past. And MOST IMPORTANTLY and SURPRISINGLY (I thought I would not like the book) it very noticeably and significantly produced the Fruit of the Spirit in me! I read the top books on all the positions on "hell" and this one produced the Fruit of the Spirit in me! What that said to me is that there is a lot of truth in the book! Did I become a Universalist? No! But it opened my my to a much broader view of salvation. This subject has been given to us in scripture in a way that the precise nature of "hell" is simply not clear. Some aspects of it are, but NOT as much as some will adamantly claim. I'm glad the topic is being discussed and considered prayerfully by people, and I love that Rob does not let them put him in a box. Rob ask great questions! I believe it extremely important to prayerfully grapple with the scriptures and truth in our lives and to be honest about what we do not know for sure. Jesus rose, that if for sure. What the "second death" in Revelation precisely is, or what Jesus meant by "Perish" is open to debate all day long!
@@joshhigdon4951 yes John describes The second. We need to learn how to read these passages symbolically Josh. These things are not literal. Is Jesus literally a little baby lamb standing at the center of a throne? Well of course not. Revelation is symbolic in his pointing to different things. The second death is the death of death itself, and the death of separation between man and God. The lake of fire represents God’s cosmic plan to burn away everything from the human soul that is not like him. This will take different ages and length of time to go through for some versus others. The true biblical meanings behind the English words eternal and everlasting prove this. God operates in ages and eons of time. Not sure how much you know about Greek and its nuances in the New Testament Some people will resist and continue to suffer in their personal hell, other people will Soften sooner than later, but at the end of revelation John sees people coming out of the lake of fire and into the new Jerusalem, “whose gates will never be shut day or night”. Josh answer this question - why would the gates never be shut? In a secluded, tribal, elitist religious community like Calvinism is, the gate to heaven would always be closed in the final estimation of things, because all the elect are in. Because it is an isolated exclusive community. But this gate of the new Jerusalem always WILL BE open, and the invitation to “come!” will always go forward! Read it yourself. Why is the invitation to come into the new Jerusalem continuing to go out even after death???? Because souls can still be saved after death! If we think about that brother that’s simple logic. Now our job is to go ask ask Holy spirit for revelation as wevread Revelation ha ha. It has to be read symbolically… Holy Spirit has to point out what he’s really talking about beneath the literal surface reading. This is how the apostle Paul learned to read scripture, it’s why he realized that the Old Testament was the “ministry of death” WHEN READ LITERALLY. It’s symbolic my man. The letter kills but the spirit gives life Paul said. This means that reading Bible passages literally in certain places brings death to our spirits because they are not meant to be read that way. On their surface reading it appears like God is commanding to kill and smite and destroy. These things are symbols to my friend of deeper realities. God is killing and destroying things inside of us and all humanity that keep us back and keep us from loving correctly. This is what the lake of fire is. It is the returning of us to our true nature, our God given image and identity inside. This is what the lake of fire does and purifies people back to the state and bring them to a place of repentance so they can see their need for God and for other people. We only know what God is like by looking at Jesus. If Jesus does not commit violence and take life and permit people being stoned or hurt or fire call down from heaven on them, this means Jesus does not believe in retaliation and violence and destroying people. And God the father is exactly like Jesus is. When you have seen Jesus you have seen the father! And no Jesus will never change his actions and what he does in the future. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday today and forever! Now that scripture makes sense doesn’t it? So much beauty and truth is lost when we look at things only literally. The greatest most powerful things in the world are taught through symbols and figures. Feel free to private message me. I was a former Calvinist and God had mercy on me and showed me the light. If we believe God is going to save us Josh, while there’s others he will NOT pick, we have fallen prey to what’s called confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance. Also a whole lot of pride and arrogance. And not knowing how to read Jesus and Paul correctly of course. Paul was the biggest Universalist that has ever lived. His language in his epistles is full of the theme of all things being reconciled back to God through Christ. All things whether on earth or under the earth my brother will be reconciled back to God through Christ! All things, all things. God is much much bigger than Calvinism has taught. Calvinism’s God is a weak and small and petty and childish and schizophrenic and terrible God. The god of Calvinism is no God at all, it is a figment of John Calvin‘s imagination. God bless you bro, sorry this was so long, and feel free to private message me. Big blessings man
@@thejjshow2488 while I appreciate the reply, thats way to much to even try to respond to. But in saying that, I think you're either misunderstanding what my very short comment was, or you're just adding to what I said with no basis for doing so. Just little background...I am a reformed baptist who believes strictly Scripture alone as being the final authority. That doesn't insinuate, at all, that I dont understand basic hermeneutics of the passages. To assume that from that very short comment I wrote is disingenuous at best.
I agree Rob asked great questions, and I don’t believe he was being evasive in any way. I also agree with the substance of your post and especially your conclusions. I’m curious - did you get to read the second half of the book, and would you recommend it?
@@thejjshow2488 no, you have to use exegesis. Its not about symbolism or any other excuse you want to use. Sure, there is symbolism, there is literalism, apocalyptic language, etc, but it doesn't make it untrue. Rob is a universalist, not unlike many neo-evangelists and g@y affirming christianity. Its all lies. They create a god in their own image. They are the creatures saying to the Creator "why have you made me this way". There is a hell and its not a figure of speech. While it may not be literal fire, the symbolism points to it being horrible and fire isn't a fun thought to ponder. However, hell is Gods wrath being poured out on unrepentant sinners. Thats what hell is. They could be in heaven for all we know, but they will ve suffering Gods wrath, which is hell. The only other person that knows what Gods full wrath is is the person of Christ, who suffered Gods wrath for the atonement, imputation, amd justification for "all the Father draws". Christ death did not atone for every person who ever lived.
this was a very sloppy done interview... not usually the case ...but both interviewers were cutting each other off in eagerness to ask their questions... and when rob fires back finally with substance the moderator wants to move on from the greek and first century jewish context.... rob clearly at the beginning of this interview is playing defensive chess here, all the while scoping for information from the two to understand the den he has entered. it was an ok interview but seemed a bit scattered in nature and the interviewers were spending to much time trying to "nail jello to the wall" instead of exploring the premises in a deeper manner.
Rob did not have much substance. He made himself to sound biblically illiterate on the subject. He said nothing to convince anyone of what he believes. "It was an ok interview" but Rob just didn't have the wherewithall to defend his position.
@dennis- so i assume you already know that the chances of anyone changing anyones mind (when said person already has a conclusion on the matter (you?) is next to impossible unless you have a personal connection and long standing discourse with that person... and even then you must have an open mind... i agree with you about the substance part but at the same time, the interviewers had a big part in that... they easily could have discussed chapter xyz of the book and dive into the premise of the book rather than stay high level trying to get him to admit he’s universalist.... for example “Rob chapter six of your book describes the reconciliation of all things, many people will read passages such as sheep/goats or i am the way the truth etc... and then read your chapter and be confused, how do you approach that with your audience?” ... much better question than leading with rob are you a universalist... the former rob reply’s and then the guest replys to rob and the interview moves on and explores the premise of the book.... been doing this a long time and justin knows this wasn’t his best stuff... he’s interviewed rob before and went fine structure wise... i know what rob was doing but i also know what justin failed to do... which way you line up on the issue isnt really relevant to my point... rob wasn’t offering much and when he started to do so justin moved away from the substance... he doesn’t usually do that .
Dennis Leveridge rob is getting double teamed the whole time what do you expect? imagine defending your stance when two people with opposing views are feeding off each other’s energy and also controlling the ebb and flow of the conversation
I feel like so much is lost in conversations like this because of Ego. Instead of being about the ideas, its about "What does Rob Bell believe". It becomes personality cultish. Rob bell is one human of billions of humans, on one planet of trillions of planets. I think that a detachment from ego and what "I" believe would lead to a focus on the ideas themselves
Still a fantastic conversation this many years later. I'm fairy conservative in my theology, but I love listening to Rob Bell. His questions strike deeply at many things we simply assume because we've grown up our entire lives hearing it. He makes me think even more deeply about my convictions, especially on this topic.
Which conversation were listening to? Mr Rob Bell avoided all the genuine questions ask of him. He does not seem to understand the topic at hand. Did he really write the book?
@@danieljones2048 Rob Bell was the only one answering questions. When the conversation finally got to the literature, Rob cited the verses and meaning of words that led him to his understanding, and Adrianne just went back to his bullying. "You can't be in the evangelical club if you don't believe like I do." and "aren't you worried what ppl will think of you if you ask questions?"
Why on Earth doesn't Rob just cite a passage from Scripture that ties it all together, perhaps this one: For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. Romans 14:11 I'd say this sums it up, no?
Sure it sums it up as long as you ignore ALL of the rest of scripture, which illustrates the meaning of that verse..... which is exactly the opposite of what Bell and his blind worshippers believe it means.
What is unclear about Rob's response is that he doesn't clear about the type of Hell he espouses - an eternal punishment Hell or as purgatorial, refining, purifying and 2nd chance Hell?
I don't agree with Rob Bell in a lot of things but when he was speaking about the cross and the payment of sin and we could not do or fulfill what Christ did, your guest didn't even respond to that truth, but went around to find something else Rob was doing or saying.
True, also the host tends to step in when a good dialogue is about start. The guest could have asked "but where is that in your book?" and pressed him. Guess he's not perfect either.
At first going through Bell’s book was rejecting his viewpoint Over the years and knowing my own imperfection I can’t help but conceive of a God whose love can’t or won’t overcome all sorts of imperfection of thought, belief and action that we can’t even comprehend.
I wish that the host allowed more dialogue between the two men. It seemed clear to me when the other guy pushed Rob against the wall and it was getting "hot" in a good way so we could finally hear clear "yes/"no" from Rob, but then the host UNECESARILY stopped this a few times, which made me upset. Now we're left wondering about certain things do Rob believe and teach them or not. Wasted opportunity. :(
I think three things need to be discussed to understand this, the nature of God, the nature of humanity and the nature of hell. Only understanding these three things together gives us an accurate picture.
It’s so tiring when people like Rob Bell play silly word games and just answer questions with questions. It’s clear there is a separation. What does Paul say? If you do x y and z you WILL NOT inherit the kingdom of God. Period. There’s no get out clause after this age is over.
Rob Bell seems to be a subjectivist about everything. Disagree with him and he'll ask "But do you know that?" implying that you're arrogant and wrong(objectively?) to do so. Ask him if he thinks everyone will be saved and he'll ask "But don't you want that?" implying that you don't and are therefore coldhearted and that wanting it to be true somehow makes it so. It must be a miserable existence to think the only knowable truth is that those who don't accommodate your feelings are wrong and mean.
As clear as some think, or wish the subject of "hell" is... there is a ton that is debatable and is NOT clear at all! Rob throws out GREAT and legitimate questions! Also, to say he is subjective about everything is not legitimate. He totally affirms a ton of fundamental evangelic orthodoxy. The fact is that there are clear things and not clear things in the Bible. The subject discussed here is a very non clear one. It is also not a salvic question. If a person is unsure about the precise nature of hell, or does not get it right, does NOT disqualify them from eternal God's love! I know of no one who is 100% clear or certain on its precise nature.
@@tchristian04 Of course He was. But what God knows, compared to humans is not the question at hand. What he has and has not revealed about its precise nature is what is being considered.
@Marianne Havisham Yea I know, neither is the Trinity. It's a doctrine that is held by the Catholic Church. I don't really understand what your response is about. My initial post is about what Bell's view of Purgatory would be because the way he talks about Hell seems to fit more of the Catholic view of Purgatory then the typically understanding of what the Bible saids about Hell.
@Marianne Havisham So a few thoughts to your last few responses: So I have been part of a number of denominations myself, the Catholic Church (8 Years), a Non-Denominational Church (6 Years), and most recently the Wesleyan Church (6 Years). So I have done myself a fair amount of work trying to understand the differences between the Catholics and the Protestants. The Trinity is a universal Christian belief across denominations, but it is a doctrine in the sense that it is our Theological attempt to make sense of how God interacts with himself. There is no where in the Bible itself that directly states anything about a trinity, but it is our universal understanding of the nature of God. Likewise, while the belief in Purgatory is unique to the Catholic Church it is similar to other doctrines. It is not directly stated in the Bible but it's the Catholic Church's attempt at trying to understand what the Bible has to say about life after death, salvation, and the spiritual realm. Now the Biblical defense for Trinity Theology is really easy to do which is why it became a universal belief, the Biblical defense for Purgatory is much harder which is why only some Christians believe in it.
@@timsmith9503 Do you personally believe the Bible supports there being a purgatory? If so, can you share some scriptures with me you believe point to this?
Regardless of who's right or wrong, I'm pretty sure in a debate the moderator/host isn't supposed to sit on one side and take turns going after the other side. This is so set up with attempted gotchas. I'm only a few minutes in and even though I'm interested in the subject I really don't want to endure any more! Rob very gracious despite the grinning vitriol sitting side-by-side at the other end of the studio.
Interesting discussion points. Ironically a direct answer would be an incorrect answer due to pre-conceived ideas and boxes of the listener... encourages me to do my own background research
"And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death *and hell* were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death." (Rev. 20: 13-14) how does anyone conclude from this, that hell is the eternal punishment?
Everyone seems to think that Bell is making objective claims about universalism, but that's not the case. Bell never sought out to make any objective claims in the first place, he only says that our traditional view of hell may not be the certain truth, and then presents other alternative theory's. Just because he believes that universalism or annihilationism could be the truth, doesn't mean he believes that it IS the truth. He is clearly agnostic on the concept of hell, and while he makes it evident that he has a preference for universalism being true, that doesn't make him a universalist. He is only asking open ended questions.
As a ctian of around 35 years and a preacher of His word ( from time to time) my greatest struggle is the doctrine of hell... I'm so glad I learned that there are 3 belief Re hell 1) eternal conscious torment - w/c majority believe 2) conditional immortality/ annihilation - by Edward fudge 3) the gospel of inclusion by Carlton Pearson..... I'm so glad I learned this..... I was set free
@@Vevay1961 I don’t have any investment in the question of Bell’s Christianity, but he does seem to fall within the historic bounds of orthodoxy for what it’s worth.
They should ask the fallen angles if he’ll is forever, the demons asked Jesus “have you come to torment us before our time”, remember the demons asked Jesus to inhabit the pigs, rather to be cast into the abyss. These men know not , the terror of the lord!
"A clear reading of scripture?" Understanding Christians like Rob scare the hell into bibliolotars. To say their is one clear reading is a misunderstanding of what a text is. The Bible tells you what God wants you to understand ever time you read it informed ny the Holy Spirit. Believing in the Bible is not Christianity, knowing God's son Christ Jesus crucified is.
So if "forever" in hell is not really forever, then what about forever in heaven? Do we also need to fear that we may not be in heaven forever? Could we "fall out" of heaven at some point just like the angels did? If you can change your mind in hell, is it not possible to change your mind in heaven? If it is possible to save in hell, is it possible to be lost in heaven? Seams to me as soon as you question the meaning of "forever", you have to grant this possibility!
Forever can mean a space of time and by extension perpetuity so some could argue Heaven is literal forever he’ll is nonliteral but I think you make a good point. I would fear God while in Heaven because perfect angels lost that fear and rebelled so how is rebellion when perfect impossible going forward. Free will and knowledge of good and evil is still there
Rob Bell is basing his thoughts on scriptures, but unlike most commenters, he takes a scholarly approach. He is studying not only modern versions but also the original Hebrew and Greek texts, as well as an understanding of the 1st century audience, based upon Hebrew writings of the day, to get a more nuanced understanding of the scriptures. The scriptures were written from an Eastern perspective, which is very different from our modern Western perspective. I just finished Love Wins and I find it to be very thought-provoking and helpful for me to gain a better understanding of The Bible. In Acts 17:11we are called to imitate the Bereans: "Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." We are meant to wrestle with the scripture, because it is NOT black and white! We are not called to be able to parrot whatever our pastors say, but to work out our the truth.
I think the severity of the church's reaction, in those days, towards Rob much outweighed the severity of what he was actually saying. With exception to "Unbelievable?", they did a fair job. Rob asked great questions and made great points that weren't really being asked and talked about very much in the days of 2005-11 and he brought them to the forefront. It wouldn't surprise me in the least bit if the church's reaction to him is a major factor as to why Rob is not a Christian anymore. It could only have served as encouragement to him to keep moving in the direction he was going and away from where the lashing out was coming from.
Rob is trying to have an intellectual and imaginative conversation about the Christ while these guys are asking him what tactical and earthly labels of Christianity that he believes in.....the conversation almost got cool when Rob asked them questions yet they completely didn't answer them and focused of making him answer their questions and pulling what they thought were his emotions out of the questions he asked...trying to label him was all this was about and it bored me to watch.
I don't know if Bell is correct. I've been looking into what the Bible is actually trying to teach us about hell. Sin is serious for sure that's why Jesus had to suffer and die as He did. I don't think you have to believe in enteral torment to want to repent. I know when I came to Christ I was just so overwhelmingly sorry for sinning against someone who, I finally realized had loved me so much. This was after hearing a sermon about Christ suffering on the cross. I can't say I was afraid of hell, or punishment. I knew I deserved punishment though, but didn't have to live under it because of love. As I've read the Bible it seems to be a story about God never giving up on us. "Father forgive them." was said about he people who knew the scriptures and had met God in the flesh and still hated Him. If Jesus is that patient for the ones who should have had no excuse, how much more patient is He for the rest of humanity? We should want to know what is true, not worry about being called a Liberal or not an Evangelical. That was weird how they kept bringing that up. They quote read from someone labeling it "Liberalism" seems like a using a buzz word to dismiss something. Also, quoting Time magazine? come on, do they decide what's Evangelical? Also, Time is always gonna be over dramatic about anything they think is gonna divide Christians. That's nothing new.
this seems to be a conflict between a european view of christianity and a rabbinic one. europeans value falsifiable propositions and rabbis argue about things endlessly with no clear answer in view.
Why would anyone even begin to think that if we don't choose or follow Christ in this life that we would not change our mind in the next life? That is totally absurd. We cannot see and hear and make the best decisions in this life. We see, hear and know in part, like through a glass dimly. I think the obvious is that when we cross over into the heavenly realm EVERY SINGLE PERSON WILL REPENT. What I mean by this is that we will all (believer, non-believer, young, old, etc.) will change the way we think (which is what repentance is) because we will be able to see things that we didn't see in our earthly life. So if we believers can change the way we think as we see so much more than we could before, why could not and would not non-believers also change that way they think. Also I don't think there are any scriptures that negate the possibility of post mortem repentance.
Rob is right. We have misunderstood the terms 'aion', 'aionion' and 'aionios'. They were incorrectly translated into latin as 'aeternum' which gives off the impression of neverending. This translation error is central to the discussion. His questions about this and the correspondent hebrew term 'olam' werent answered. Yet he was being accused of not taking scripture seriously. I would suggest hes taken scripture seriously enough to come to understand this and that it warrants further exploration rather than just condemning him and others because it goes against the perceived tradition. The question about the meaning of 'all things' was far from satisfactory also which again warrants further study and thought from those who insist on labelling people as heretics for holding to a more coherent view of Gods ultimate loving purposes through judgement.
To question the nature of what "hell" is, does not make someone not evangelical!!! As clear as some think, or wish the subject is... there is a ton that is debatable and is NOT clear about it! Rob throws out GREAT and legitimate questions.
That maybe so, but on the other hand, if he want new readers and thinkers to get to know him and his way of being in the world, he really needs to answer. At least som of rhe questions.
Stormy You might want to listen back on the interview because he did answer some of the questions. He believes in the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. And he answered some other questions. When it comes to religion, far too often people want to pigeonhole you and label you so that they can instantly discount you and brand you as a heretic instead of actually grappling with and fully looking at the subject matter. I think he did an outstanding job of not being manipulated. And leaving a little bit of mystery about his ultimate belief doesn’t bug me one bit. Makes me want to read his book again, or watch some more interviews.
Jesus didn't deny the faith. Rob has. Rob is not a Christian. I pray he turns from sin and puts his trust in Christ. He has strayed even farther today than he did in this video. He now claims that Jesus never called himself God. The Bible says that if someone says this they are an antichrist.
Right out of the gate the questioners sound offensive. What he's being "evasive" about is not being understood through the lens of any camp many are trying to place him in. Once you've been placed in a camp (whether agreed or not) there are secondary assumptions that are unconsciously and immediately brought to the table that create binary discussion and veil the conversation's nuance. It creates a situation where 'individuals' aren't talking for themselves, 'camps' that are represented through what we assume about them are talking to each other. It's very toxic. A lot like politics... 🤔
Praise the Lord my dear, believe it or not humans and religions has become very similar in their thoughts and beliefs about God and the spiritual realm. It's like a puzzle when comes to God's truth, all denominations or spiritual humans have a bit of truth and some not so true It's like none is completely wrong just a little off balance. Unity as thinkers can reveal the greatest facts and logic that exist in this generation. I can't quote the Bible but I do know to trust my one and only teacher who is the living holy spirit in Christ holy name. I love listening to you as much as I love listening to Rob. Thank you for your time in this circle of life 🙏
I feel like Rob is coming from this from a 'bigger picture' angle. So he emphasizes what's the most important way to engage with the man on the street who has these questions. But the other two are coming from a place of "ok yes we know what's the most important thing to emphasize for new Christians, we know some mysteries are left to God, but this specific issue of Hell is what we're here to discuss as it ties in somewhat with the Gospel message." Rob is here to discuss, but I think the others were expecting a friendly debate.
Rob Bell doesn't have answers to questions that are put to him. Instead he asks questions in response. This is not only not clever. It's a sign that he doesn't know what he thinks or should think.
I’m not trying to be smart here.... in my observation and limited understanding of what I read in scripture when Jesus is asked on issues that the Pharisees and Seduces brought up.... didn’t He answer their questions with asking questions?
@@stephaniem895 Are you saying that someone who replies to questions with questions of their own should never be suspected of not being able to answer the question because Jesus answered questions with questions? If so, how could anyone distinguish between someone who knows the answer but likes to mimic Jesus and someone who is unable to articulate his position such that others can understand it?
It is very much Jewish tradition, that even Jesus followed, to absolutely answer a question with a question. This requires the student to work and dig through what he believes and in the long run is a better, fuller answer for the student as opposed to the teacher just giving an answer. Give someone a fish dinner and he is thankful. Teach someone how to fish and when they put forth the struggle, catch and prepare the meal, they are more fully satisfied and better prepared for the future. A very good teacher doesn’t usually just give you the answer but rather gives you the tools to find the answer.
Agree with Adrian on all the issues, not Rob. I do sympathise with Rob over how horrible he finds the idea of eternal punishment in Hell. I find it horrible as well, and I believe in it.
Interesting conversation, so why would a God of love, grace, and mercy create a place called Hell only to send us to it for not being perfect. I believe he'll was made up by people who need a sin nature. I also believe Jesus wasn't talking about a literal hell but Gehanna and what happened about 70AD. And finally I believe we create our own hell on earth by the way we live. Just saying. David
It's an interesting debate. You know, many of us were raised with a kind of southern California hippie version of Jesus as this laid-back, all-forgiving guy. That is the version many people want to believe. It's certainly a lot more fun and implicitly provides a greater latitude to think and behave in ways that are morally questionable. However, if one reads the Gospels objectively, you are immediately struck by how forceful Jesus is in many of his condemnations. Far from the mellow pacifist, He is, in fact, highly divisive and provocative in many of the things He does and says. One of the things He seems particularly contemptuous of is those who, in their pride and self-delusion, seem to believe they already have heaven in the bag. In fact, it could be argued that his belief in the salvation of sinners arises from his knowledge that they lack such blinding pride, and because of that, are open to redemption.
Rob Bell is obviously a decent bloke trying to hang on to his faith when the scriptures of that faith clearly talk about eternal torture... a one size fits all punishment where people who don't sign up to a specific religion/doctrine burn alongside child murders for ever and ever. Can you imagine if christians truly thought this to be true? Can you imagine what psychopaths they would have to be to proclaim love to the leader just because they had been chosen for freedom? It's like pretending to love Hitler because you are safe as a non-jew but eternally worse.
Remember it is possible for people to lose salvation, repentance is not enough. Many in this generation are still falling backwards,Many are claiming to be born again yet they have nothing to say about the experience. Much is still missing from your books, i found many are taking another person experience and calling it their own without experiencing the spiritual change themselves
I would really like for Justin to have Tim Mackie from “The Bible Project” on to give his view on hell. Tim M. Comes across like a universalist when he teaches.
It appears that the two British interviewers have been blue pilled, and are so close minded that they cannot see the forest through the trees. Thank God for people like Rob Bell who are waking up and making a statement of truth. We are all in different places a different times, some people can’t or will not hear truth. I should know I used to be one of them, that is to say someone to not hear something new that is truth. Look what they did to Jesus, he was changing the whole program and you saw what they wanted to do with him. 57:09
boy these guys are trying to pin labels on rob. to answer a question with a question is intelligent; it is to clarify... what grace he has responded with! wonderful conversation anyhow. i respect their being straight forward.
Bell has always been this frustrating, he makes truth claims in print then won't stick to them when pressed. we can know for certain. jesus preached hell more than anyone in the Bible
“Jesus preached hell more than anyone else in the Bible.” And? That’s not news to advocates for Christ-mediated universalism. Read Talbott’s work (eg second edition of “Inescapable Love if God” and his chapters in the 2003 volume “Universal Salvation? The Current Debate” edited by Parry and Partridge), David Bentley Hart, Robin Parry’s book “The Evangelical Universalist” (under pseudonyms Gregory MacDonald), etc
@@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns The belief that everyone is going to Heaven. It is one of the most damaging ideas in modern times because it removes the necessary sense of urgency in earnestly seeking our salvation - Watered down Christianity does not speak much about Hell. It does not warn souls of the danger they face -"If men only know what awaits them in eternity, they would do everything in their power to amend their lives" - "Among adults there are few saved because of sins of the flesh.... With the exception of those who die in childhood, most men will be damned"
Jotun, I’ve been studying this debate since 2003. This promise you that the case is much stronger than you or Bell could articulate. Hell, I’ll send you 100 dollars if you can summarize half of Reitan’a arguments, or Robin Parry’s, or Talbott’s
meow meow meow Atheists study for years to still conclude there is no God. Because they start with a false worldview. Scholarly research does not guarantee one to be right. We can spend years reinterpreting bible verses, when a child can read the words of scripture declaring hell as a reality and know the truth.
I very much resonate with Rob’s comments. The way Adrian began is the very reason I began to deconstruct my “faith.” It seems he (1) wants to respect and live in his grandmother’s faith” (whatever that means) and (2) then rattles off 2 Peter reference without any context.
Is there nothing to be learned by pondering the answers to good questions? If one is prompted to assess what Scripture says, then they are asked to go to Scripture for the answer. Can Rob answer better than Scripture? Would his answers really be better than his questions?
Nicholas Whitmire, Proclaimer Of Messiah Rob obviously had answers to all the questions. He just didn’t want to articulate them fully, I saw him only seeking to verify himself as still being a “Christian”(in the scheme of western evangelicalism). I respect his searching of truth and challenging of presuppositions of western evangelical thought/doctrine, it’s something all disciples of Christ need to assess for themselves. But when pressed for his answer regarding universalism, eternal punishment, and Hell- he gave absolutely no clarity. He just turned the question on the questioner, is he afraid of his own answer? Is he convinced of his own searching? It seems like Rob in his inquiry of studies metaphorically opened up a “can of worms” that if were to be true, would shift the entire paradigm of Christianity, and force it to venture off into theological territories unknown. This is exactly what he keeps pressing, but when questioned directly he’d rather spiel orthodoxy then challenge the questioner. Is he afraid to be known for what he actually believes? Personally, his avoidance was extremely frustrating.
@@peteryang2067 There was a time when the pagan doctrine of Hel was new to Christianity, but what Scripture teaches is the original. Rob is clearly rather agnostic on some of these details, and he doesn't fully understand how Scripture teaches regarding life, death, and identity; so he did his best. Rob also decided to let God and Scripture articulate his perspective, rather than be accused of going against Scripture, so he asked questions about God and Scripture to let Scripture speak. Rob couldn't directly answer because of his agnostic perspective on the points, there is no single dogmatic answer for him, can't give what doesn't exist. If he could've given direct answers, then come the accusations of going against God and Scripture, then would come the questions about what Scripture says; seems like cutting to the chase meant they covered far more ground in an hour.
Nicholas Whitmire, Proclaimer Of Messiah Well said, I agree. He should have just had the dialogue, because honestly, I DONT REALLY WANNA READ THE BOOK lol. Oh well
Wow, buddy is so mad that rob isn’t sure on eternal punishment. It’s ok to question yeah all, praise the lord for men like rob. These two guys remind me of the religious in Jesus day
Rob bell says “help someone find salvation...” he is a universalist so what is salvation to him?it is not Gods will that any should perish, I believe that! It ALL STARTS with the fact that we are all lost and condemned, the Messiah came to draw ALL men to the Father, but people reject that offer, sadly. So those who reject Gods offer of deliverance, what God forces them to come? Some kind of reverse irresistible grace. First it is not scriptural, second its nonsensical!
I have never seen Rob claim that he was a universalist. I think he allows it to be a mystery so that people will concentrate on the topic and not on him. I love the questions he asks in his book. They’re very powerful and they demand answers. What they do is they blow away paradigms that many of us have been taught our whole life. You may not get all the answers but you might get more questions and that’s OK if that is what has been revealed in scripture. People always want answers clean and cut. But there’s many subjects that are not.
Mark Metternich Photography, LLC I didn’t have questions after I read the book. It was clear from his perspective “love wins”. He defines that very clearly that God wins ALL humans in the end analysis, and if anyone goes to hell then Godbis a loser! If you didn’t clearly get that from reading his book than reread it.
The moment when Rob attempts to discuss the first century understanding of the English word eternal by referencing the Greek, Hebrew and rabbinic tradition of using the term is telling. It appears that Adrian Warnock isn’t familiar with this basic scholarship or knows that it poses a serious challenge to his “traditional” view. Instead of addressing the issue, he redirects. It seemed to me that both Warnock and the host cared more about labeling Rob’s views than understanding them. Rob is very patient and kind.
Exactly! Well said!
To be fair, Rob Bell seems to be doing a lot of deflecting as well.
Good point here. The Greek and first century Hebrew texts reveal some meaning missed by English translations and we need to honestly look into this without just believing a doctrine because we’re told we have to. Bell is very well-informed and more than a match for this line of questioning.
Yes so true.
Rob says the parable of the rich man and Lazarus is more of a hijacking by Jesus of something popular purely for that timeframe, not a teaching and window into the future.
I don't think confining Jesus's words to pure first century tradition gets to the root of the issue
Wow I must say..I watched this is 2013, and felt very much on the ‘side’ of the hosts. But now my 30 year old self is watching in some disbelief at the hostility and narrow mindedness of these questions. Rob displayed such grace, humility and courage. I may not agree with all his views but you can’t doubt that ‘God is Love’
Interview summed up:
Host and Adrian: "Do you think (.....)?"
Rob Bell: "Do you?"
So annoying
Yes, ridiculous. It sounds like he goes as far as he dares, and then leaves it vague.
““I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.””
- John 16:33
Ridiculous
For those that find Rob Bell’s perspective a breath of fresh air I would recommend from a more Eastern Orthodox perspective Bradley Jersak’s “Her Gates Shall never be Shut” and a brilliant and compelling book written by David Bentley Hart entitled “that all shall be saved; heaven, hell and universal salvation”.
Universalism is a lie of the devil and totally opposite of Biblical teaching.
Hi Paul, Bentley-Hart has produced an interesting translation of the NT.
I’m interested in whether you’ve seen it and if so, what you think of it.
@@colinloechel8378 Yes! I really do like Bentley Hart’s translation and reference it often.
I have had zero interest in the Bible after 10 years out of Christian Ministry. I started reading Love Wins and read the Bible for the first time recently with genuine interest and excitement.
I’m so glad I came back to this confrontation. Originally I agreed with Justin and Adrian. But after years of diving into these types of debates and my own study - I’m a little shocked at how much Justin and Adrian were “telling” Rob what his fundamental beliefs were. I think they would have gotten much farther by first asking what Rob believes and entering into his questions with more thought on the meanings of things like “eternal,” “punishment,” or etc.
Totally disagree with you. Justin and Adrian read Bell's words in his book back to him - then recited what the Bible says - and then Bell either said nothing or minimized his heresy. Bell was clearly evasive (ie, did not defend) his heretical statements in his book.
Christianity needs more Rob Bells.
So I was just thinking Mr. Bell would be a much better politician than preacher. Then he goes and asks for a free copy of Adrian’s book. Perfect
Have you heard of a concept of a joke?
Bryce Clemmer sure, but there is generally an element of truth in a joke. Additionally, the way a person jokes can reveal something about who they are-their character. I was just making an observation. I didn’t particularly care for Mr. Bell’s brand of joking. I found him snide and condescending for the most part. Perhaps he is arrogant and believes he is always the smartest guy in the room, or perhaps he is insecure and desperate to cover over his insecurities. I don’t know. Maybe it’s a bit of both or maybe it’s neither and I am way off. Either way, I found him to be obnoxious.
He can be a double bullshitter!
The most conservative and traditional belief of scripture is to love God, to love others, and even to love yourself. Beyond that, it's just commentary.
Rob Bell is apparently saying that in some cases the Koine Greek of the New Testament was mistranslated into English such that the original Greek does not mean the same thing as the English translation. He's apparently also claiming that in some cases the translation is accurate, but is misunderstood. For example, some exegetes claim that when Jesus said that the condemned will be cast into everlasting fire, he wasn't saying that the condemned will never be removed from the fire. He was merely saying the fire itself never goes out.
I love Rob Bell’s fresh prospective of God, and I also understand that he too is still searching and may not have everything figured out, as no one does and as no one will ever have everything figured out in regard to so many mysteries when it comes to God. As a former church attendee, let me tell you what this whole thing came down for me: yes, God is both a loving entity and simultaneously angry with sin. The church/pastors have focused too much ( at least the ones I’ve gone to) on the anger of God towards sin and not enough on the love of God towards humanity. Rob Bell is searching the loving aspects of God, he puts focus on that since, God knows we have enough- unhealthy so- focuse on the wrath and anger of God. And that’s what keeps me away from the church- the constant guilt lashing, anger preaching, emotional manipulation circling around how horrible we are and how much we have to constantly repent. The hosts are trying to be nice, versus Rob is being nice.
You should try attending again. No one preaches on sin anymore.
Rob Bell has a great debate style, he's not forcing anyone to believe what he believes he's just asking questions based on the bible verses themselves.
Yes! Really enjoy. I wouldn’t trust Adrian’s hermeneutics on anything serious.
Rob is so good. This discussion/debate is needed as well. The living Bible is meant to be discussed and not swallowed whole. These convos are exactly how the message was spread from the jump.
Both men get a tip o’ the cap. I lean towards Rob’s view rather than the potentially weaponizing view of Adrian.
Dear Premier Christian radio and Justin, THANK YOU. Your work in bringing these issues up and presenting both sides is so much appreciated
Um, all of the questions were directed at Mr. Bell. How is that both sides? More like, Attack of the Clones. Just kidding. I am thankful too.
Rob after dying in front of God
God: dear Rob, have you sinned on earth?
Rob Bell: I don't know, have you?
You got to love Rob. He so much reminds me of Jesus. Always talking in parables.
Hahaha, that's funny
I don't know why this isn't top comment😂👌
So funny jajaja
@@larryfreund5536 , Jesus' parables led people to answers.
I like how Rob goes into the context and meanings of words that we translate as "forever". Adrian was frustrating me when he was saying, "literal translation of scripture". I thought that analyzing the etymology, utility, and context of words IS literal translation. Rob frustrated me by continuously answering questions with questions.
Totally agree. Both were talking across purposes.
Justin was surprisingly biased in this one too.
I liked how Mr. Bell admitted, he is still learning. May that be a lesson to us all, to keep asking questions. Such humility! ... To dialogue, not merely to put others on trial.
Of course, a real debate would have a moderator, and the moderator would be asking questions of both sides. Therefore, I felt Mr. Bell was free, here, to make his own rules.
There is no Greek word that means 'eternal' or for ever. The Greek word in the NT always means a time period, or is a qualitative expression!
Wow! This was amazing discourse. I was very grateful the disagreements were handled with mutual respect. Sometimes you could see it was hard to do. :) Its critically important to respectfully talk about our understanding of the Bible without eating each other alive. You 3 gave me a lot to think about. Many thanks, gentlemen. I hope I view other "Premier Christian Radio Videos" like this in the future. God bless you all!
Tim Keller has a brilliant article on hell that cuts to the chase. Here's a portion:
Some years ago I remember a man who said that talk about the fires of hell simply didn't scare him, it seemed too far-fetched, even silly. So I read him lines from C.S. Lewis:
"Hell begins with a grumbling mood, always complaining, always blaming others . . . but you are still distinct from it. You may even criticize it in yourself and wish you could stop it. But there may come a day when you can no longer. Then there will be no you left to criticize the mood or even to enjoy it, but just the grumble itself, going on forever like a machine. It is not a question of God 'sending us' to hell. In each of us there is something growing, which will BE Hell unless it is nipped in the bud."
To my surprise he got very quiet and said, "Now that scares me to death." He almost immediately began to see that hell was a) perfectly fair and just, and b) something that he realized he might be headed for if he didn't change.
We run from the presence of God and therefore God actively gives us up to our desire (Romans 1:24, 26.) Hell is therefore a prison in which the doors are first locked from the inside by us and therefore are locked from the outside by God (Luke 16:26.) Every indication is that those doors continue to stay forever barred from the inside. Though every knee and tongue in hell knows that Jesus is Lord (Philippians 2:10-11,) no one can seek or want that Lordship without the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:3.This is why we can say that no one goes to hell who does not choose both to go and to stay there. What could be more fair than that?
So well put, actually inspired!
Remarkable answer. It comes in perfect time for me to teach my 15-year-old daughter about the conscious of sin. Thank you for sharing. Can't wait to read the book.
Something more I'd like to add. This comment from you has led me to think that we are, as Christians, brothers, and sisters in Crist, no matter where we are. We share a common faith and we resist the evil of the world which, quite often, comes with sophisticated disguises. So, I just want to thank you again for your post because somehow it gave me strength in a moment of weakness and doubts.
Read The Chronicles of Narnia, specifically The Last Battle: "The dwarfs are for the dwarfs." Is there anyone who will undertand my comment?
I love Tim Keller (and C.S. Lewis), but I feel this concept of locking the doors from the inside only works in theory (and I say that as someone who used to preach this exact message).
I can imagine people rebelling / rejecting God AT FIRST. I can see them locking those doors from the inside for a few months, a few years-MAYBE even a few decades… But ETERNITY?
Is it feasible to believe that 100% of the people that wind up in hell will continue to reject God and NOT seek repentance? A 24-year-old born in the wrong country? A 40-year-old who's spent their entire life being manipulated, hurt, betrayed by “church” folk? A 50-year-old who tried to stay faithful, but lost everything (much like Job), but never had their moment where God speaks from a whirlwind?
OR as Rob Bell aptly questions… would God continue to punish a 17-year-old for the choices they made in those short 17 years of life… for ETERNITY? Can a developing mind truly carry enough HUBRIS to last FOREVER? This great God who created the universe, time, space, and conquered death… Can't figure a way to soften the heart of a 17-year-old? How can an “omnipotent” God be so impotent?
From what I can tell, Rob Bell is challenging people to think critically of their relationship with God. I think for the most part, the people who are trying to defame him aren’t wanting to do that. If you have a relationship with God, then we shouldn’t fear the thought of “Is my relationship with God genuine?”
This! I absolutely agree. @rexevans9070 I hope you are still thinking critically of your relationship with God!
@@MaxMax-ib6xg thanks for asking. Yes I still am doing that. It started way back when I married my wife 33 years ago. I was vehemently against anyone who lived a gay lifestyle. Then I met my wife who lived a lesbian lifestyle for 7 years before that. My paradigms started to blow up back then. It’s been quite a journey with God since then.
This was interesting! I liked the part about how the word Jonah used as "forever" means 3 days haha.
It seems like Rob makes controversial statements in his books and videos, but when challenged on them he is vague and hesitant. I think that says a lot about the solidity of his claims.
He is a terrible bunch, frustrating listening to him... Never certain about anything
Exactly, Dan. It's actually hard not to become flustered with his constantly avoiding direct questions by asking what Justin or Adrian believe.
The belief that everyone is going to Heaven. It is one of the most damaging ideas in modern times because it removes the necessary sense of urgency in earnestly seeking our salvation
Thats the thing that everyone is seeming to miss though. Bell never sought out to make any objective claims, he only says that our traditional view of hell may not be the certain truth, and then presents other alternative theory's.
@@GameCrawler but he refuses to say which alternative theory he believes is correct or even what one he thinks is more likely to be so. Where is the scholarship in saying "this view might not be right, there are these other views..."? We know the alternative theologies/thoughts on Hell already. They aren't new. He revels in creating this ambiguity, he can't hide his grin when ppl are frustrated by his evasion when he is asked his personal view on the matter. If he is responsible for the spiritual "health" of his flock he should be wary of teaching false doctrine. Ppls souls could be in jeopardy. Either he doesn't care, or he does care, but doesn't think anyone's souls are actually in danger. If the latter is true, (and I trust it is,) then why not just say it?
"Repent for the Kingdom of heaven is at hand" What do you think this means if it is not a warning. "The ax is already at the root of the tree, if you do not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire." It does not say you will be taken out of the fire if you repent later.
Yes there are some clear verses that seem to make your point, but there and others that might seem to contradict it. This is no clear issue as to the precise nature of hell. All verses from Genesis to Revelation have to be considered as it is a long unfolding narrative in the Bible. "Four Views on Hell Paperback - January 6, 1997" and the second edition are a great start to see the broader narrative.
@@MarkMetternichPhotographyLLC There are no verses tjat contradict it. Refer to them if you can? Hell is a state more than a place. You are not sent there, you end up there. It is your own attitude. It is not a punishment it is a consequence.
Meta Space Crowned By Time john is talking specifically to the jews about christ being revealed ... its specific to the jews with reference to the tree producing fruit ref as in prophecy in isaiah ... not meant for us... christ revealed himself to the jews first then his death n rez included gentiles... anything else from that scripture is proof texting... repent literally means change your mind!
Meta Space Crowned By Time I gave you a pretty good primer book that lays out the different perspectives on “hell”’s more precise nature. I studied the subject very extensively from all the main perspectives and from the best advocates of those positions and YES, there is a Gehenna (valley of Ben Hinnom) Sheol, Hades, Tartarus, Abaddon... described in hundreds of verses in the Bible, each having a variety of implications and unfolding meanings related to the nature of the finally impenitent wicked’s destination. Yes there are consequences to hating or avoiding Gods Love, and relationship. But it’s precise nature is not clear. Some aspects of it seem so, but others not, when one dives deep into the subject comprehensively. I’m not a Universalist and I don’t think Rob is (but not entirely sure) and part of my intensive, over a year study had Robs book come up as a position to read. A very theologically trained friend who was not a Universalist recommended it to me. I did not want to read it due to not being interested in something that might be even remotely Universalist, but I read it (most of it) and found it VERY interesting (particularly the great questions!) and it created a significant spike of Love, compassion, kindness, goodness... The Fruit of the Spirit... in my life, notably. After giving it a fair shake, I believe the book has a lot of truth in it, and it is recommended if a person wants to look at all the issues and angles related to the important topic. But no, it did not make me change what I see as the strongest case. One study showed me is that (a lot like eschatology!) people that think the issue is open and shut clear, simply are not looking unbiased at all the Bible says on the matter. Nor carefully considering the genre’s of literature and the full view of the entire narrative. If you have not given the subject a thorough investigation from all perspectives, I highly recommend it.
Jake Vezeau Pretty close here. Metanoia is two words that literally mean “mind change” and “afterward”. Or, to “think differently - afterward.” It also
implies heart change with the different thinking/afterward. Original Biblical thinking does not separate a mind change from a heat change. They are integrally connected.
There are also many types of “metanoia.” They are not all weeping in sackcloth and ashes like you see more in the Old Testament (because Messiah had yet to come and do His redeeming work). After praying to God one could be touched by God and not help but to “think differently afterward” about how awesome God is, and of course that would result in a natural transformation of ones heart and create joy”!
Also about the fruit... that is not entirely true. In the Bible the Tree/Bush/Vine/Branch/Fruit is a extremely long developing narrative that starts in Genesis 1 and is echoed through all the letters even to the end of Revelation. In ancient biblical thinking/narrative tree, vine, fruit, branch are all forms of Tree. Aside from God and Humans it is a motif or design pattern used more than any other living thing in all of scripture. The vine, tree, fruit of the vine and so forth represent God Himself Who is Eternal Life and being plugged into Him. The general clear idea is that if someone genuinely comes to Christ/God and genuinely believes into Gods grace gift of Himself/eternal life/forgiveness/Love... God comes into us, we come into him and that is transformative. No way around that. God in-dwells the believer (belief changes heart) and there is no way out of the fact that good fruit, transformation, thinking differently afterward will naturally occur and grow in us. In other words, if years are going by and the fruit of the spirit is not growing in our lives, we might want to double check the authenticity of our faith in Jesus.
So maybe I am misunderstanding you, but just belief does not get us in. It is a genuine belief that has transformation built in.
Señor Bell, When someone asks you a question, a coherent answer would be much appreciated. Buenas Noches.
Is it wrong that Rob would have the other person think for themselves and give honest consideration? What means more to you, what one other person insists, or what your honest thoughts think? Therefor, Rob seeks to offer the most meaningful discussion. It's easy enough to not think about, and just assume and insist Rob is wrong; but to think about it for ourselves prevents simple assumption and stokes self-honesty.
Exactly my thoughts. He is shifty and not transparent at all.
@@sammiezook I don't get where you are coming from. The questions let one consider God and Scripture, which is a better more enlightening means of discussion than personal claims. I can't relate to the accusation that Rob was shifty, I see zero merit to that.
Rob is pretty well known for being a kind of sage, who pitches the question back, often rephrasing it to challenge the inquirer to consider it more deeply. He has a talent for forcing his students to more deeply consider their questions, often empowering them to derive their own answers, or even open their eyes to their preconceptions and biases inherent in the question. He has a gift, but it wasn't useful in this discussion.
@@yourfavoritesteve How was it not useful? Seems he was able to put listeners in place to consider possibilities which they have been trained to never consider lest they be deemed heretics, and kept the focus on God and Scripture. Justin and Adrian were trying to focus on Rob and his doctrine, but Rob kept it about Scripture and God. The important question is what may be true; it's not so important what Rob's own doctrinal stance is. Looks like most viewers want Rob to simply say something they can accuse as heresy, but would that have been more helpful to anyone? Is there something I am missing here? What would have been more useful to the discussion?
(I know the technical aspects that fully clarify the matter, and if you ask I'll gladly tell, but I don't think Rob had that full technical understanding so he couldn't share it. I would love to discuss it with Rob on a livestream, could help people see exactly what Scripture actually teaches, which is VERY Good News indeed)
John 6:44 ""No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day."
God makes the first move!
@Barkoot Geleta Nor Per-se, I believe in what the Bible says about predestined, but I don't believe people have been predestined to go to a lost eternity.
Abstract, but hopeful ... Hopeful, if love wins.
I’m Jewish and I was never threatened with Hell or enticed by Heaven. An Evangelical Christian asked me if I was going to. Heaven or Hell. I didn’t know if Jews believed Hell existed.
Me in 2011: Rob Bell is straying from orthodoxy and is on the verge of dangerous ground...
Me in 2020: Rob Bell hadn’t quite gotten free of toxic religion yet, but he is on the verge of holy ground...
I was thinking the same
If you guest refuses to present clear answers about his opinion, kick him out, there is no need to hear endless question without a few attempts of answers
Me in 2011: Rob seems to be straying from orthodoxy.
Me in 2020: Rob seems to be straying from orthodoxy and is very adept at being evasive about it.
Tim Matteson Glad to hear you have grown over the past decade!
Ps2MexFan he answered. They just didn’t like his answer
You really really should have Bart Erhman on to talk about his latest book, Heaven and Hell, after airing this.
Yes, of course, a great book!
Rob repeatedly reflects the questions, saying, "Well, do you?". It doesn't matter what I think, Rob, you're the one who wrote a book about this and you're the one who needs to answer the questions clearly.
The host quoted his rhetorical questions within the book… it’s to ponder on the answer and to have discussions about them. He doesn’t have the answer hence why he asks “Well, do you?” because neither do they.
@@rutakassa5631 The whole point of a rhetorical question is that the answer is obvious- not that there isn't one. Even though he doesn't give an answer, he certainly has a bias and a worldview shaping his thoughts.
@@genessapanainte2609 Hmm I disagree. The whole point of a rhetorical question is to make a point… the obvious answer is that there isn’t one, hence why he continues to respond with “Well, do you?” because the host and co-guest don’t know either.
So discovered a few years ago now, so refreshing, freeing from some of the religious Christian beliefs.
I am a follower of Christ and actually feel more free now after reading and listening to Rob Bell, who is on tour in the UK this year. I've got my ticket.
a follower of Christ but a listener of Rob Bell... dangerous stuff.. listen to Jesus, who is the true son of God, even from before the world began.
Does Rob ever directly answer any questions?
Looks like he learned from the way Jesus answered questions!
I'm am so annoyed by Rob right now. It's like they are asking him questions about a book he never wrote!
@@trentbridenpiano Do you mean these guys are trying to trick Rob as did those with Jesus? Rob does well in a monologue, but as soon as someone challenges his position everything comes tumbling down. No, Jesus didn't answer questions like this.
Did Satan?
@@trentbridenpiano Jesus answered many questions more directly than expected!
The problem among us Christians is that we categorise each other depending on not just the church we belong to but also political views. There are far too many “christianists” who believe in all sorts of “christianism” instead of just being humble believers in and followers of Jesus Christ.
That just about everyone is going to Heaven. It is one of the most damaging ideas in modern times because it removes the necessary sense of urgency in earnestly seeking our salvation - Watered down Christianity does not speak much about Hell. It does not warn souls of the danger they face - -"If men only knew what awaits them in eternity, they would do everything in their power to amend their lives" - "Among adults there are few saved because of sins of the flesh.... With the exception of those who die in childhood, most men will be damned"
I like your point! I think Jesus gets trampled in our polarization.
Have you thought, perhaps Jesus is a moderate? I think, for example, because of the nature of the Ten Commandments' being ten, not nine or eleven (liberal or conservative), likely Jesus was a moderate. His Beatitudes, to me, are analogous to the Ten.
You can have whatever view you want, friend, but if it doesn't comport with the scriptures, then it is worthless and wrong. People don't like things that are black and white but God is very clear when he speaks and there is no equivocation in His truth.
@@DB-dl5zm And in your view where and how and to whom does God speak?
Oh no, not those Christianists. I heard they love labeling and judging people.
Thanks for the debate. I'm planning to read Love Wins
Justin is such an excellent host .
Wow I must say..I watched this is 2013, and felt very much on the ‘side’ of the hosts. But now my 30 year old self is watching in some disbelief at the hostility and narrow mindedness of these questions. To think that people actually think that God will eternally punish a finite being for an infantile amount if time, is just sad. Rob displayed such grace, humility and courage. I may not agree with all his views but you can’t doubt that ‘God is Love’ - 1 John
I don't understand when the bible says thrown into the lake of fire for eternity??? People think they can subtract or add to the bible JUST to make themselves feel good. Revelation even warns of this. These type of people Jesus stated they were luke warm and he will spit them out. Hell is real and Jesus even said that MOST PEOPLE will go to Hell especially when he stated it's easier for a Camel to go through an eye of the needle than for a Rich man to get to Heaven. God Bless
So you interpret lukewarm as someone who is able to see some time durations as nonliteral? Lukewarm means sinful and carnal sir. Jonah was in the belly of the whale forever according to the Bible and yet got out in three days. By your logic, anybody who believes he did not stay in the whale forever literally is lukewarm and heading for hell
@@ajaxslamgoody9736 revelation is a spiritual book…we can not pick and choose what is literal and what is a spiritual metaphor…if the lake of fire is literal then so is everything else mentioned in that book, including the dragon. In the very first chapter of revelation it says these things are signified meaning they are symbols…If God condemned the act of burning people alive to Moloch and Baal…the. he most certainly condemns the teaching of eternal conscious torment.
I read about 1/2 of the book as part of a comprehensive study on "hell" and although I am not a Universalist (I doubt that Rob is one) the book absolutely did two GODLY things in me. It refreshingly broke some paradigm's I had and got me to start thinking more seriously and creatively about things I had been taught in the past. And MOST IMPORTANTLY and SURPRISINGLY (I thought I would not like the book) it very noticeably and significantly produced the Fruit of the Spirit in me! I read the top books on all the positions on "hell" and this one produced the Fruit of the Spirit in me! What that said to me is that there is a lot of truth in the book! Did I become a Universalist? No! But it opened my my to a much broader view of salvation. This subject has been given to us in scripture in a way that the precise nature of "hell" is simply not clear. Some aspects of it are, but NOT as much as some will adamantly claim. I'm glad the topic is being discussed and considered prayerfully by people, and I love that Rob does not let them put him in a box. Rob ask great questions! I believe it extremely important to prayerfully grapple with the scriptures and truth in our lives and to be honest about what we do not know for sure. Jesus rose, that if for sure. What the "second death" in Revelation precisely is, or what Jesus meant by "Perish" is open to debate all day long!
Open for debate? Sola Scriptura. John describes what the second death is. Read further
@@joshhigdon4951 yes John describes The second. We need to learn how to read these passages symbolically Josh. These things are not literal. Is Jesus literally a little baby lamb standing at the center of a throne? Well of course not. Revelation is symbolic in his pointing to different things. The second death is the death of death itself, and the death of separation between man and God. The lake of fire represents God’s cosmic plan to burn away everything from the human soul that is not like him. This will take different ages and length of time to go through for some versus others. The true biblical meanings behind the English words eternal and everlasting prove this. God operates in ages and eons of time. Not sure how much you know about Greek and its nuances in the New Testament
Some people will resist and continue to suffer in their personal hell, other people will Soften sooner than later, but at the end of revelation John sees people coming out of the lake of fire and into the new Jerusalem, “whose gates will never be shut day or night”.
Josh answer this question - why would the gates never be shut? In a secluded, tribal, elitist religious community like Calvinism is, the gate to heaven would always be closed in the final estimation of things, because all the elect are in. Because it is an isolated exclusive community.
But this gate of the new Jerusalem always WILL BE open, and the invitation to “come!” will always go forward! Read it yourself. Why is the invitation to come into the new Jerusalem continuing to go out even after death???? Because souls can still be saved after death! If we think about that brother that’s simple logic. Now our job is to go ask ask Holy spirit for revelation as wevread Revelation ha ha. It has to be read symbolically… Holy Spirit has to point out what he’s really talking about beneath the literal surface reading.
This is how the apostle Paul learned to read scripture, it’s why he realized that the Old Testament was the “ministry of death” WHEN READ LITERALLY. It’s symbolic my man. The letter kills but the spirit gives life Paul said. This means that reading Bible passages literally in certain places brings death to our spirits because they are not meant to be read that way. On their surface reading it appears like God is commanding to kill and smite and destroy. These things are symbols to my friend of deeper realities. God is killing and destroying things inside of us and all humanity that keep us back and keep us from loving correctly. This is what the lake of fire is. It is the returning of us to our true nature, our God given image and identity inside. This is what the lake of fire does and purifies people back to the state and bring them to a place of repentance so they can see their need for God and for other people. We only know what God is like by looking at Jesus. If Jesus does not commit violence and take life and permit people being stoned or hurt or fire call down from heaven on them, this means Jesus does not believe in retaliation and violence and destroying people. And God the father is exactly like Jesus is. When you have seen Jesus you have seen the father! And no Jesus will never change his actions and what he does in the future. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday today and forever! Now that scripture makes sense doesn’t it?
So much beauty and truth is lost when we look at things only literally. The greatest most powerful things in the world are taught through symbols and figures. Feel free to private message me. I was a former Calvinist and God had mercy on me and showed me the light. If we believe God is going to save us Josh, while there’s others he will NOT pick, we have fallen prey to what’s called confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance. Also a whole lot of pride and arrogance. And not knowing how to read Jesus and Paul correctly of course.
Paul was the biggest Universalist that has ever lived. His language in his epistles is full of the theme of all things being reconciled back to God through Christ. All things whether on earth or under the earth my brother will be reconciled back to God through Christ! All things, all things. God is much much bigger than Calvinism has taught. Calvinism’s God is a weak and small and petty and childish and schizophrenic and terrible God. The god of Calvinism is no God at all, it is a figment of John Calvin‘s imagination. God bless you bro, sorry this was so long, and feel free to private message me. Big blessings man
@@thejjshow2488 while I appreciate the reply, thats way to much to even try to respond to. But in saying that, I think you're either misunderstanding what my very short comment was, or you're just adding to what I said with no basis for doing so.
Just little background...I am a reformed baptist who believes strictly Scripture alone as being the final authority. That doesn't insinuate, at all, that I dont understand basic hermeneutics of the passages. To assume that from that very short comment I wrote is disingenuous at best.
I agree Rob asked great questions, and I don’t believe he was being evasive in any way.
I also agree with the substance of your post and especially your conclusions.
I’m curious - did you get to read the second half of the book, and would you recommend it?
@@thejjshow2488 no, you have to use exegesis. Its not about symbolism or any other excuse you want to use. Sure, there is symbolism, there is literalism, apocalyptic language, etc, but it doesn't make it untrue. Rob is a universalist, not unlike many neo-evangelists and g@y affirming christianity. Its all lies. They create a god in their own image. They are the creatures saying to the Creator "why have you made me this way". There is a hell and its not a figure of speech. While it may not be literal fire, the symbolism points to it being horrible and fire isn't a fun thought to ponder. However, hell is Gods wrath being poured out on unrepentant sinners. Thats what hell is. They could be in heaven for all we know, but they will ve suffering Gods wrath, which is hell. The only other person that knows what Gods full wrath is is the person of Christ, who suffered Gods wrath for the atonement, imputation, amd justification for "all the Father draws". Christ death did not atone for every person who ever lived.
this was a very sloppy done interview... not usually the case ...but both interviewers were cutting each other off in eagerness to ask their questions... and when rob fires back finally with substance the moderator wants to move on from the greek and first century jewish context.... rob clearly at the beginning of this interview is playing defensive chess here, all the while scoping for information from the two to understand the den he has entered. it was an ok interview but seemed a bit scattered in nature and the interviewers were spending to much time trying to "nail jello to the wall" instead of exploring the premises in a deeper manner.
Rob did not have much substance. He made himself to sound biblically illiterate on the subject. He said nothing to convince anyone of what he believes. "It was an ok interview" but Rob just didn't have the wherewithall to defend his position.
@dennis- so i assume you already know that the chances of anyone changing anyones mind (when said person already has a conclusion on the matter (you?) is next to impossible unless you have a personal connection and long standing discourse with that person... and even then you must have an open mind... i agree with you about the substance part but at the same time, the interviewers had a big part in that... they easily could have discussed chapter xyz of the book and dive into the premise of the book rather than stay high level trying to get him to admit he’s universalist.... for example “Rob chapter six of your book describes the reconciliation of all things, many people will read passages such as sheep/goats or i am the way the truth etc... and then read your chapter and be confused, how do you approach that with your audience?” ... much better question than leading with rob are you a universalist... the former rob reply’s and then the guest replys to rob and the interview moves on and explores the premise of the book.... been doing this a long time and justin knows this wasn’t his best stuff... he’s interviewed rob before and went fine structure wise... i know what rob was doing but i also know what justin failed to do... which way you line up on the issue isnt really relevant to my point... rob wasn’t offering much and when he started to do so justin moved away from the substance... he doesn’t usually do that .
Dennis Leveridge rob is getting double teamed the whole time what do you expect? imagine defending your stance when two people with opposing views are feeding off each other’s energy and also controlling the ebb and flow of the conversation
Nail jello to the wall! I love your points! Thank you!
I feel like so much is lost in conversations like this because of Ego. Instead of being about the ideas, its about "What does Rob Bell believe". It becomes personality cultish. Rob bell is one human of billions of humans, on one planet of trillions of planets. I think that a detachment from ego and what "I" believe would lead to a focus on the ideas themselves
Still a fantastic conversation this many years later. I'm fairy conservative in my theology, but I love listening to Rob Bell. His questions strike deeply at many things we simply assume because we've grown up our entire lives hearing it. He makes me think even more deeply about my convictions, especially on this topic.
Which conversation were listening to? Mr Rob Bell avoided all the genuine questions ask of him. He does not seem to understand the topic at hand. Did he really write the book?
@@danieljones2048 Rob Bell was the only one answering questions. When the conversation finally got to the literature, Rob cited the verses and meaning of words that led him to his understanding, and Adrianne just went back to his bullying. "You can't be in the evangelical club if you don't believe like I do." and "aren't you worried what ppl will think of you if you ask questions?"
It's okay Rob. They aren't ready for it.
Ready for what he not saying anything new
Why on Earth doesn't Rob just cite a passage from Scripture that ties it all together, perhaps this one:
For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
Romans 14:11
I'd say this sums it up, no?
Sure it sums it up as long as you ignore ALL of the rest of scripture, which illustrates the meaning of that verse..... which is exactly the opposite of what Bell and his blind worshippers believe it means.
Demons bow the knee and confess that Jesus is God. What is your point?
He would say this means that everyone gets saved and that any other meaning is taken out of context
What is unclear about Rob's response is that he doesn't clear about the type of Hell he espouses - an eternal punishment Hell or as purgatorial, refining, purifying and 2nd chance Hell?
I don't agree with Rob Bell in a lot of things but when he was speaking about the cross and the payment of sin and we could not do or fulfill what Christ did, your guest didn't even respond to that truth, but went around to find something else Rob was doing or saying.
True, also the host tends to step in when a good dialogue is about start. The guest could have asked "but where is that in your book?" and pressed him. Guess he's not perfect either.
At first going through Bell’s book was rejecting his viewpoint
Over the years and knowing my own imperfection I can’t help but conceive of a God whose love can’t or won’t overcome all sorts of imperfection of thought, belief and action that we can’t even comprehend.
I wish that the host allowed more dialogue between the two men. It seemed clear to me when the other guy pushed Rob against the wall and it was getting "hot" in a good way so we could finally hear clear "yes/"no" from Rob, but then the host UNECESARILY stopped this a few times, which made me upset. Now we're left wondering about certain things do Rob believe and teach them or not. Wasted opportunity. :(
I think three things need to be discussed to understand this, the nature of God, the nature of humanity and the nature of hell. Only understanding these three things together gives us an accurate picture.
Yet, two of these may be abstract, you think?
Rob Bell demostró un conocimiento muy por encima de sus críticos y se ve en su espíritu de paz como en su dominio del contexto bíblico.
It’s so tiring when people like Rob Bell play silly word games and just answer questions with questions. It’s clear there is a separation. What does Paul say? If you do x y and z you WILL NOT inherit the kingdom of God. Period. There’s no get out clause after this age is over.
Rob Bell seems to be a subjectivist about everything. Disagree with him and he'll ask "But do you know that?" implying that you're arrogant and wrong(objectively?) to do so. Ask him if he thinks everyone will be saved and he'll ask "But don't you want that?" implying that you don't and are therefore coldhearted and that wanting it to be true somehow makes it so. It must be a miserable existence to think the only knowable truth is that those who don't accommodate your feelings are wrong and mean.
tchristian04 Such a good summation! 👏🏼👍🏼 well done
He didn’t seem to stick to his guns in several points but I think he’s onto something.
As clear as some think, or wish the subject of "hell" is... there is a ton that is debatable and is NOT clear at all! Rob throws out GREAT and legitimate questions! Also, to say he is subjective about everything is not legitimate. He totally affirms a ton of fundamental evangelic orthodoxy. The fact is that there are clear things and not clear things in the Bible. The subject discussed here is a very non clear one. It is also not a salvic question. If a person is unsure about the precise nature of hell, or does not get it right, does NOT disqualify them from eternal God's love! I know of no one who is 100% clear or certain on its precise nature.
Mark Metternich Photography, LLC Jesus wasn’t certain of the nature of hell?
@@tchristian04 Of course He was. But what God knows, compared to humans is not the question at hand. What he has and has not revealed about its precise nature is what is being considered.
I am really interested in Bell's view of purgatory, because I have felt like he describes that more then hell.
@Marianne Havisham Yea I know, neither is the Trinity. It's a doctrine that is held by the Catholic Church. I don't really understand what your response is about. My initial post is about what Bell's view of Purgatory would be because the way he talks about Hell seems to fit more of the Catholic view of Purgatory then the typically understanding of what the Bible saids about Hell.
@Marianne Havisham So a few thoughts to your last few responses:
So I have been part of a number of denominations myself, the Catholic Church (8 Years), a Non-Denominational Church (6 Years), and most recently the Wesleyan Church (6 Years). So I have done myself a fair amount of work trying to understand the differences between the Catholics and the Protestants.
The Trinity is a universal Christian belief across denominations, but it is a doctrine in the sense that it is our Theological attempt to make sense of how God interacts with himself. There is no where in the Bible itself that directly states anything about a trinity, but it is our universal understanding of the nature of God.
Likewise, while the belief in Purgatory is unique to the Catholic Church it is similar to other doctrines. It is not directly stated in the Bible but it's the Catholic Church's attempt at trying to understand what the Bible has to say about life after death, salvation, and the spiritual realm.
Now the Biblical defense for Trinity Theology is really easy to do which is why it became a universal belief, the Biblical defense for Purgatory is much harder which is why only some Christians believe in it.
@@timsmith9503 Do you personally believe the Bible supports there being a purgatory? If so, can you share some scriptures with me you believe point to this?
@@joshuaWEC No I don't personally believe in purgatory I just think it would be interesting to hear what Rob Bell's thoughts on that topic would be.
Regardless of who's right or wrong, I'm pretty sure in a debate the moderator/host isn't supposed to sit on one side and take turns going after the other side. This is so set up with attempted gotchas. I'm only a few minutes in and even though I'm interested in the subject I really don't want to endure any more! Rob very gracious despite the grinning vitriol sitting side-by-side at the other end of the studio.
Love can change everyone's heart so there is no reason anyone would have too go too.hell
Interesting discussion points.
Ironically a direct answer would be an incorrect answer due to pre-conceived ideas and boxes of the listener... encourages me to do my own background research
"And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death *and hell* were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death." (Rev. 20: 13-14)
how does anyone conclude from this, that hell is the eternal punishment?
Everyone seems to think that Bell is making objective claims about universalism, but that's not the case. Bell never sought out to make any objective claims in the first place, he only says that our traditional view of hell may not be the certain truth, and then presents other alternative theory's.
Just because he believes that universalism or annihilationism could be the truth, doesn't mean he believes that it IS the truth.
He is clearly agnostic on the concept of hell, and while he makes it evident that he has a preference for universalism being true, that doesn't make him a universalist. He is only asking open ended questions.
Well said. I agree
Rob quoted Hebrews but forgot the last sentence, that God is consuming fire!
Notice nobody is arguing about eternity when it comes to heaven
🧐 good point
Yeah, I like your point! Reminds me of the legend about Lucifer choosing to leave heaven. Doesn't shake your faith in love, though, or does it?
That is because Good is always greater than evil, which is disordered love, disordered will.
As a ctian of around 35 years and a preacher of His word ( from time to time) my greatest struggle is the doctrine of hell... I'm so glad I learned that there are 3 belief Re hell
1) eternal conscious torment - w/c majority believe
2) conditional immortality/ annihilation - by Edward fudge
3) the gospel of inclusion by Carlton Pearson.....
I'm so glad I learned this..... I was set free
Bell makes me want to be a Christian.
Warnock reminds me of why I no longer can.
You forgot to add the word "fake" before the word Christian.
@@Vevay1961 I don’t have any investment in the question of Bell’s Christianity, but he does seem to fall within the historic bounds of orthodoxy for what it’s worth.
@@Vevay1961says the European 😂
They should ask the fallen angles if he’ll is forever, the demons asked Jesus “have you come to torment us before our time”, remember the demons asked Jesus to inhabit the pigs, rather to be cast into the abyss. These men know not , the terror of the lord!
How can you ask a demon anything
nathan mckenzie If you recall Jesus talked to the demon who named himself Legion, for we are many !
David Scholfield what kind of abstract nonsense, is this!
@@dh1335 I recall a story about a guy, mo evidence any of that happened
What about the scripture that says, It is appointed to a man once to die and then the judgement That seems pretty final to me.
"A clear reading of scripture?" Understanding Christians like Rob scare the hell into bibliolotars. To say their is one clear reading is a misunderstanding of what a text is. The Bible tells you what God wants you to understand ever time you read it informed ny the Holy Spirit. Believing in the Bible is not Christianity, knowing God's son Christ Jesus crucified is.
So if "forever" in hell is not really forever, then what about forever in heaven? Do we also need to fear that we may not be in heaven forever? Could we "fall out" of heaven at some point just like the angels did? If you can change your mind in hell, is it not possible to change your mind in heaven? If it is possible to save in hell, is it possible to be lost in heaven? Seams to me as soon as you question the meaning of "forever", you have to grant this possibility!
Forever can mean a space of time and by extension perpetuity so some could argue Heaven is literal forever he’ll is nonliteral but I think you make a good point. I would fear God while in Heaven because perfect angels lost that fear and rebelled so how is rebellion when perfect impossible going forward. Free will and knowledge of good and evil is still there
Where do you think the Bible teaches being in heaven for ever? I would say no where!
Rob Bell is basing his thoughts on scriptures, but unlike most commenters, he takes a scholarly approach. He is studying not only modern versions but also the original Hebrew and Greek texts, as well as an understanding of the 1st century audience, based upon Hebrew writings of the day, to get a more nuanced understanding of the scriptures. The scriptures were written from an Eastern perspective, which is very different from our modern Western perspective. I just finished Love Wins and I find it to be very thought-provoking and helpful for me to gain a better understanding of The Bible.
In Acts 17:11we are called to imitate the Bereans: "Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." We are meant to wrestle with the scripture, because it is NOT black and white! We are not called to be able to parrot whatever our pastors say, but to work out our the truth.
Thank you Adrian for supporting the true Word of God 🙌🏻
Said the sheep.
I think the severity of the church's reaction, in those days, towards Rob much outweighed the severity of what he was actually saying. With exception to "Unbelievable?", they did a fair job. Rob asked great questions and made great points that weren't really being asked and talked about very much in the days of 2005-11 and he brought them to the forefront. It wouldn't surprise me in the least bit if the church's reaction to him is a major factor as to why Rob is not a Christian anymore. It could only have served as encouragement to him to keep moving in the direction he was going and away from where the lashing out was coming from.
Rob bell isn't a Christian anymore?
@@troywright359 He is still a Christian, I don't know where the commenter got that idea from.
Rob is trying to have an intellectual and imaginative conversation about the Christ while these guys are asking him what tactical and earthly labels of Christianity that he believes in.....the conversation almost got cool when Rob asked them questions yet they completely didn't answer them and focused of making him answer their questions and pulling what they thought were his emotions out of the questions he asked...trying to label him was all this was about and it bored me to watch.
They were unwilling to openly answer because the answers would expose their folly
I don't know if Bell is correct. I've been looking into what the Bible is actually trying to teach us about hell. Sin is serious for sure that's why Jesus had to suffer and die as He did. I don't think you have to believe in enteral torment to want to repent. I know when I came to Christ I was just so overwhelmingly sorry for sinning against someone who, I finally realized had loved me so much. This was after hearing a sermon about Christ suffering on the cross. I can't say I was afraid of hell, or punishment. I knew I deserved punishment though, but didn't have to live under it because of love.
As I've read the Bible it seems to be a story about God never giving up on us. "Father forgive them." was said about he people who knew the scriptures and had met God in the flesh and still hated Him. If Jesus is that patient for the ones who should have had no excuse, how much more patient is He for the rest of humanity?
We should want to know what is true, not worry about being called a Liberal or not an Evangelical. That was weird how they kept bringing that up. They quote read from someone labeling it "Liberalism" seems like a using a buzz word to dismiss something.
Also, quoting Time magazine? come on, do they decide what's Evangelical? Also, Time is always gonna be over dramatic about anything they think is gonna divide Christians. That's nothing new.
this seems to be a conflict between a european view of christianity and a rabbinic one. europeans value falsifiable propositions and rabbis argue about things endlessly with no clear answer in view.
And now that we have a clear view (Jesus Christ) we don’t have to argue endlessly.
Unfortunately, with so many thousands of different denominations worldwide it feels like Christians are arguing and disagreeing more than ever
Why would anyone even begin to think that if we don't choose or follow Christ in this life that we would not change our mind in the next life? That is totally absurd. We cannot see and hear and make the best decisions in this life. We see, hear and know in part, like through a glass dimly. I think the obvious is that when we cross over into the heavenly realm EVERY SINGLE PERSON WILL REPENT. What I mean by this is that we will all (believer, non-believer, young, old, etc.) will change the way we think (which is what repentance is) because we will be able to see things that we didn't see in our earthly life. So if we believers can change the way we think as we see so much more than we could before, why could not and would not non-believers also change that way they think. Also I don't think there are any scriptures that negate the possibility of post mortem repentance.
Rob is right. We have misunderstood the terms 'aion', 'aionion' and 'aionios'. They were incorrectly translated into latin as 'aeternum' which gives off the impression of neverending. This translation error is central to the discussion. His questions about this and the correspondent hebrew term 'olam' werent answered. Yet he was being accused of not taking scripture seriously. I would suggest hes taken scripture seriously enough to come to understand this and that it warrants further exploration rather than just condemning him and others because it goes against the perceived tradition. The question about the meaning of 'all things' was far from satisfactory also which again warrants further study and thought from those who insist on labelling people as heretics for holding to a more coherent view of Gods ultimate loving purposes through judgement.
I'm really looking forward to being in Heaven.
My team will win every game !
To question the nature of what "hell" is, does not make someone not evangelical!!!
As clear as some think, or wish the subject is... there is a ton that is debatable and is NOT clear about it! Rob throws out GREAT and legitimate questions.
That maybe so, but on the other hand, if he want new readers and thinkers to get to know him and his way of being in the world, he really needs to answer. At least som of rhe questions.
Stormy You might want to listen back on the interview because he did answer some of the questions. He believes in the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. And he answered some other questions. When it comes to religion, far too often people want to pigeonhole you and label you so that they can instantly discount you and brand you as a heretic instead of actually grappling with and fully looking at the subject matter. I think he did an outstanding job of not being manipulated. And leaving a little bit of mystery about his ultimate belief doesn’t bug me one bit. Makes me want to read his book again, or watch some more interviews.
He smiles to himself because he is feeling so successful. Not because he feels shy or embarrassed
People laughed at Jesus too, even called him Satan, so there you go nothing new. Rob is a great Christian.
agreed, preaching truth and what I believe is what Jesus intended
Jesus didn't deny the faith. Rob has. Rob is not a Christian. I pray he turns from sin and puts his trust in Christ. He has strayed even farther today than he did in this video. He now claims that Jesus never called himself God. The Bible says that if someone says this they are an antichrist.
Rob is delusional.
People laughed at Harold Camping. Being laughed at isn't evidence that a person is telling the truth.
We have to acknowledge that the Bible said the road is narrow, such comes with reason
Right out of the gate Rob sounds defensive.
Right out of the gate the questioners sound offensive. What he's being "evasive" about is not being understood through the lens of any camp many are trying to place him in. Once you've been placed in a camp (whether agreed or not) there are secondary assumptions that are unconsciously and immediately brought to the table that create binary discussion and veil the conversation's nuance. It creates a situation where 'individuals' aren't talking for themselves, 'camps' that are represented through what we assume about them are talking to each other. It's very toxic. A lot like politics... 🤔
Not at all.
I disagree, that is simply not the case
Praise the Lord my dear, believe it or not humans and religions has become very similar in their thoughts and beliefs about God and the spiritual realm. It's like a puzzle when comes to God's truth, all denominations or spiritual humans have a bit of truth and some not so true It's like none is completely wrong just a little off balance. Unity as thinkers can reveal the greatest facts and logic that exist in this generation. I can't quote the Bible but I do know to trust my one and only teacher who is the living holy spirit in Christ holy name. I love listening to you as much as I love listening to Rob. Thank you for your time in this circle of life 🙏
Is there any chance you could get David Bentley Hart on for a conversation about this topic?
Or Thomas Talbott!
I feel like Rob is coming from this from a 'bigger picture' angle. So he emphasizes what's the most important way to engage with the man on the street who has these questions.
But the other two are coming from a place of "ok yes we know what's the most important thing to emphasize for new Christians, we know some mysteries are left to God, but this specific issue of Hell is what we're here to discuss as it ties in somewhat with the Gospel message."
Rob is here to discuss, but I think the others were expecting a friendly debate.
Rob Bell doesn't have answers to questions that are put to him. Instead he asks questions in response. This is not only not clever. It's a sign that he doesn't know what he thinks or should think.
I’m not trying to be smart here.... in my observation and limited understanding of what I read in scripture when Jesus is asked on issues that the Pharisees and Seduces brought up.... didn’t He answer their questions with asking questions?
@@stephaniem895 Are you saying that someone who replies to questions with questions of their own should never be suspected of not being able to answer the question because Jesus answered questions with questions? If so, how could anyone distinguish between someone who knows the answer but likes to mimic Jesus and someone who is unable to articulate his position such that others can understand it?
It is very much Jewish tradition, that even Jesus followed, to absolutely answer a question with a question. This requires the student to work and dig through what he believes and in the long run is a better, fuller answer for the student as opposed to the teacher just giving an answer. Give someone a fish dinner and he is thankful. Teach someone how to fish and when they put forth the struggle, catch and prepare the meal, they are more fully satisfied and better prepared for the future. A very good teacher doesn’t usually just give you the answer but rather gives you the tools to find the answer.
There’s only two ways to motivate people. Love and rewards or fear and the stick. Love is superior
Agree with Adrian on all the issues, not Rob. I do sympathise with Rob over how horrible he finds the idea of eternal punishment in Hell. I find it horrible as well, and I believe in it.
Interesting conversation, so why would a God of love, grace, and mercy create a place called Hell only to send us to it for not being perfect. I believe he'll was made up by people who need a sin nature. I also believe Jesus wasn't talking about a literal hell but Gehanna and what happened about 70AD. And finally I believe we create our own hell on earth by the way we live. Just saying. David
It's an interesting debate. You know, many of us were raised with a kind of southern California hippie version of Jesus as this laid-back, all-forgiving guy. That is the version many people want to believe. It's certainly a lot more fun and implicitly provides a greater latitude to think and behave in ways that are morally questionable. However, if one reads the Gospels objectively, you are immediately struck by how forceful Jesus is in many of his condemnations. Far from the mellow pacifist, He is, in fact, highly divisive and provocative in many of the things He does and says. One of the things He seems particularly contemptuous of is those who, in their pride and self-delusion, seem to believe they already have heaven in the bag. In fact, it could be argued that his belief in the salvation of sinners arises from his knowledge that they lack such blinding pride, and because of that, are open to redemption.
Rob Bell is obviously a decent bloke trying to hang on to his faith when the scriptures of that faith clearly talk about eternal torture... a one size fits all punishment where people who don't sign up to a specific religion/doctrine burn alongside child murders for ever and ever. Can you imagine if christians truly thought this to be true? Can you imagine what psychopaths they would have to be to proclaim love to the leader just because they had been chosen for freedom? It's like pretending to love Hitler because you are safe as a non-jew but eternally worse.
1. Eternal Conscious Torment
2. Conditional Immortality
3. Trinitarian Restorationism
Which best represents God is Love?
Slithering is the word that comes to mind
Remember it is possible for people to lose salvation, repentance is not enough. Many in this generation are still falling backwards,Many are claiming to be born again yet they have nothing to say about the experience. Much is still missing from your books, i found many are taking another person experience and calling it their own without experiencing the spiritual change themselves
I would really like for Justin to have Tim Mackie from “The Bible Project” on to give his view on hell. Tim M. Comes across like a universalist when he teaches.
Would love to hear them both have a conversation!
Yeah, that would be great. However, I think Tim comes across as a conditionalist (Conditional immortality understanding of hell).
It appears that the two British interviewers have been blue pilled, and are so close minded that they cannot see the forest through the trees. Thank God for people like Rob Bell who are waking up and making a statement of truth. We are all in different places a different times, some people can’t or will not hear truth. I should know I used to be one of them, that is to say someone to not hear something new that is truth. Look what they did to Jesus, he was changing the whole program and you saw what they wanted to do with him. 57:09
boy these guys are trying to pin labels on rob. to answer a question with a question is intelligent; it is to clarify... what grace he has responded with! wonderful conversation anyhow. i respect their being straight forward.
God bless you all........❤👍
Bell has always been this frustrating, he makes truth claims in print then won't stick to them when pressed. we can know for certain. jesus preached hell more than anyone in the Bible
“Jesus preached hell more than anyone else in the Bible.”
And? That’s not news to advocates for Christ-mediated universalism. Read Talbott’s work (eg second edition of “Inescapable Love if God” and his chapters in the 2003 volume “Universal Salvation? The Current Debate” edited by Parry and Partridge), David Bentley Hart, Robin Parry’s book “The Evangelical Universalist” (under pseudonyms Gregory MacDonald), etc
@@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns The belief that everyone is going to Heaven. It is one of the most damaging ideas in modern times because it removes the necessary sense of urgency in earnestly seeking our salvation - Watered down Christianity does not speak much about Hell. It does not warn souls of the danger they face -"If men only know what awaits them in eternity, they would do everything in their power to amend their lives" - "Among adults there are few saved because of sins of the flesh.... With the exception of those who die in childhood, most men will be damned"
@@jotunman627 Why is there an exception made for those who die in childhood?
Jotun, I’ve been studying this debate since 2003. This promise you that the case is much stronger than you or Bell could articulate.
Hell, I’ll send you 100 dollars if you can summarize half of Reitan’a arguments, or Robin Parry’s, or Talbott’s
meow meow meow
Atheists study for years to still conclude there is no God. Because they start with a false worldview. Scholarly research does not guarantee one to be right. We can spend years reinterpreting bible verses, when a child can read the words of scripture declaring hell as a reality and know the truth.
I very much resonate with Rob’s comments. The way Adrian began is the very reason I began to deconstruct my “faith.” It seems he (1) wants to respect and live in his grandmother’s faith” (whatever that means) and (2) then rattles off 2 Peter reference without any context.
Adrian, context man, context!! Metaphors and understanding terms. Jesus doesn’t speak of hell or eternal torment, just doesn’t.
I appreciate how patient you both were with Rob Bell's evasive answers to your probing questions based off of his comments in his book.
Patient? Seemed like an inquisition to me.
That annoying fker Jesus and his parables started it sooooo.
This is perhaps the best example of deflection I have ever seen in my life. He does not answer simple straight forward questions.
He does not answer a single question, without asking questions. This is a very dangerous man.
Rob did not directly answer a single question. Why even interview??
Is there nothing to be learned by pondering the answers to good questions? If one is prompted to assess what Scripture says, then they are asked to go to Scripture for the answer. Can Rob answer better than Scripture? Would his answers really be better than his questions?
Nicholas Whitmire, Proclaimer Of Messiah
Rob obviously had answers to all the questions. He just didn’t want to articulate them fully, I saw him only seeking to verify himself as still being a “Christian”(in the scheme of western evangelicalism). I respect his searching of truth and challenging of presuppositions of western evangelical thought/doctrine, it’s something all disciples of Christ need to assess for themselves. But when pressed for his answer regarding universalism, eternal punishment, and Hell- he gave absolutely no clarity. He just turned the question on the questioner, is he afraid of his own answer? Is he convinced of his own searching? It seems like Rob in his inquiry of studies metaphorically opened up a “can of worms” that if were to be true, would shift the entire paradigm of Christianity, and force it to venture off into theological territories unknown. This is exactly what he keeps pressing, but when questioned directly he’d rather spiel orthodoxy then challenge the questioner. Is he afraid to be known for what he actually believes? Personally, his avoidance was extremely frustrating.
@@peteryang2067 There was a time when the pagan doctrine of Hel was new to Christianity, but what Scripture teaches is the original. Rob is clearly rather agnostic on some of these details, and he doesn't fully understand how Scripture teaches regarding life, death, and identity; so he did his best. Rob also decided to let God and Scripture articulate his perspective, rather than be accused of going against Scripture, so he asked questions about God and Scripture to let Scripture speak.
Rob couldn't directly answer because of his agnostic perspective on the points, there is no single dogmatic answer for him, can't give what doesn't exist. If he could've given direct answers, then come the accusations of going against God and Scripture, then would come the questions about what Scripture says; seems like cutting to the chase meant they covered far more ground in an hour.
Nicholas Whitmire, Proclaimer Of Messiah
Well said, I agree.
He should have just had the dialogue, because honestly, I DONT REALLY WANNA READ THE BOOK lol.
Oh well
@@peteryang2067 Exactly my response. Excruciatingly frustrating.
Wow, buddy is so mad that rob isn’t sure on eternal punishment. It’s ok to question yeah all, praise the lord for men like rob. These two guys remind me of the religious in Jesus day
Rob bell says “help someone find salvation...” he is a universalist so what is salvation to him?it is not Gods will that any should perish, I believe that! It ALL STARTS with the fact that we are all lost and condemned, the Messiah came to draw ALL men to the Father, but people reject that offer, sadly. So those who reject Gods offer of deliverance, what God forces them to come? Some kind of reverse irresistible grace. First it is not scriptural, second its nonsensical!
I have never seen Rob claim that he was a universalist. I think he allows it to be a mystery so that people will concentrate on the topic and not on him. I love the questions he asks in his book. They’re very powerful and they demand answers. What they do is they blow away paradigms that many of us have been taught our whole life. You may not get all the answers but you might get more questions and that’s OK if that is what has been revealed in scripture. People always want answers clean and cut. But there’s many subjects that are not.
Mark Metternich Photography, LLC I didn’t have questions after I read the book. It was clear from his perspective “love wins”. He defines that very clearly that God wins ALL humans in the end analysis, and if anyone goes to hell then Godbis a loser! If you didn’t clearly get that from reading his book than reread it.
Rob Bell said it all when he asked: Do you know?, Referring to what happens after death.
Like b4 u were born. Nothing