I read this in HC Verma and was confused about inertial frames and then I searched (Inertial frames) on TH-cam . Guess what , The author of the book came to clear my doubts. 😅
I’m 31 now, and it’s now that I’m finding the right places to resolve my doubts. I had read Verma sir’s books throughout my senior school days but I never had an avenue to pick his brains or directly learn from him and channels like 3Blue1Brown. But now I have a newfound love for Physics and Mathematics all over again. I guess I was born too early. 😂 But I guess, I also hated to learn back then because we were learning to chase exam after exam, and not to actually understand these very concepts in an applied manner. It’s rather now that I don’t have to learn to quench the dogma of someone evaluating my knowledge that I have this rekindled love for this beautiful subject. We’re generations of victims of a flawed education system.
Thanks. From this I was able to determine my bedroom is inertial. My laundry is not accelerating toward the washroom and I'm definitely not about to apply a force to it.
Thank you for suggesting and setting up a criteria for judging weather a frame of reference is inertial or non inertial. Most teachers I know are not so clear on this subject.
No we don't need another frame to determine if s & s' is inertial or not. Sir just gave an example to explain that it's not relative, don't take it in wrong meaning. Either a frame is inertial or non inertial, there's no relativity between them.
Sir if we have two frames moving with a constant acceleration @ and with respect to them there is one body moving with the same acceleration @ ,then will the frames be inertial or non inertial?
I think if it mainly depends on where we are seeing if we are having same accelerated then it will be inertial to us and if some other guy is seeing us who is at a rest then he finds us at non inertial frame
Sir why force is not depend on frame of reference. When we see a duster which is in rest the duster has net force 0 and when we see the same Duster on moving we see that it has an acceleration so how we can say that force is independent of frame of reference?
"If u love physics then look at the black board,but if u do not have any idea about physics then just stare to his eyes and his loveable innocent smile.obviously u will fall in love with H C Verma and in Physics.." 🇧🇩🇧🇩
Great sir No one can chalange your knowledge. Jo log dislike karte hai unka mind perfect developed nhi ha physics ko samajhne ke liye i ya to vo jealous se bhare hai.
If we find that in a given frame, an object being acted upon by a force and is accelerating with respect to the frame would that mean that the reference frame in which this object exist is inertial or non-inertial or no conclusion can be drawn?
SIR IF IN CIRCULAR MOTION A PARTICLE GOES FROM POSITION 1 TO POSITION 2 WHILE THE POSITION 1 AND POSITION 2 ARE OPPOSITE TO EACH OTHER ON THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE CIRCLE AND THE FORCE IS ACTING TANGENTIALLY AT EACH POINT IN THE PARTICLES MOTION AND HAVE THE SAME MAGNITUDE 10N THEN WHAT IS THE WORD DONE BY THAT FORC3
How to know if a particle has outer force acting in it or not? Like if its non-contact force, only way we say its there is based on acceleration right?
Please tell explain, Sir if we moves with acceleratio and then see the another frame at rest of moving with constant velocity , in that case whether that frame would be inertial or non inertial
Sir if we consider any 2 particles of mass m1 and m2 respectively in a rigid body then we know that the forces F12= F21 will cancel each other but they are acting on 2 different particle not on single particle ........please explain this
Sir then are the concept of inertial frames applied to quantum mechs as you said the particle shoulf not be accelerated but acc to heisenburg uncertainity how is it possible that when we se a quantum particle it's not accelerated. Since you have mentioned that quantum and classical physics are different but just a question ?
So can we say that non-inertial frame of reference is the indirect force experienced by an particle? As in the bus example, the bus experienced a force due to which it stopped and which resulted making us go ahead, so we felt an indirect force which was acted upon the bus.
Sir, I can know if the acceleration of a particle is 0 but how do I be sure that the force on it is also 0 , to know if my frame is inertial or non- inertial?
If acceleration of any body is 0, then it means force is obviously 0 because f=ma(Newton's 2nd law) Then inertial frame is that which is not undergoing acceleration means acceleration is 0, such as rectilinear motion, object is at rest. Since acceleration is 0,frame is inertial. Hope u get it...
Sir if a person is standing (stationary) and a vehicle is passing with uniform velocity in front him then what will be the frame of reference acc to him?
Dear ideal sir, Still the confusion remains the same.as u ended that the 3rd frame with respect to which there two frames are being obseved can be non inertial, then that 3rd frame is accelerating with acceleration 'a' then in that case will these frames s and s' be inertial or not with respect to that frame?
But how would someone know if the net force on that particle 3:29 is 0 from that frame of reference? If we know that there is an acceleration, then the only statement we can certainly make is that there is a net force acting on that particle.
@@jalilkhan6251 to understand a frame of refrence what i usually do is i imagine if my one eye is in the place of the point particle from which you want to observe...the world seen by that eye is the frame of refrence ..yes it is 3d.....for example if i want to talk about the frame of refrence of a 'fired' bullet..i think i am the bullet...then i would be at rest and the whole world would go backward...if the bullet was accelerated...then every thing in this world ( frame of refrence of bullet) would experience a pseudo force in the opposite direction ( except the bullet ..it is on rest)..and so on ..if there is some irregular shaped body..i would put my eye in the place of its centre of mass and then i will imagine the world from that perspective...but for imagining something from the ground frame i would just think of my self as a spectator observing the events happening standing on the ground...so yeah BE the thing from which you want to observer the frame( the world from that things perspective...hope this was helpful
Very good explanation of inertial and non inertial concept. That means to say whether two frames are inertial or non inertial it depends on the observer's frame.
No! That is not what he said. He said whether a frame is inertial / non-inertial is absolute and not relative. From a frame if you see a particle not acted upon by any force accelerate, it is a non-inertial frame.
I read this in HC Verma and was confused about inertial frames and then I searched (Inertial frames) on TH-cam . Guess what , The author of the book came to clear my doubts. 😅
You be like : magic w(°ｏ°)w
😂😂
@@jiya8016 according to my magic I came to know that you uses telegram for free books just like me
@@jiya8016 👏👏😂
Really is he the author ok the book
I’m 31 now, and it’s now that I’m finding the right places to resolve my doubts. I had read Verma sir’s books throughout my senior school days but I never had an avenue to pick his brains or directly learn from him and channels like 3Blue1Brown. But now I have a newfound love for Physics and Mathematics all over again. I guess I was born too early. 😂
But I guess, I also hated to learn back then because we were learning to chase exam after exam, and not to actually understand these very concepts in an applied manner. It’s rather now that I don’t have to learn to quench the dogma of someone evaluating my knowledge that I have this rekindled love for this beautiful subject. We’re generations of victims of a flawed education system.
Good luck!!
True we can fight for this together, I have found some one like me and that's you , I am thinking the same thing about education System of India
"We’re generations of victims of a flawed education system." That hit hard.
@@wildfacts8863 How do we fight this? Is there any way besides becoming a politician?
@@aakashsrivastava133 yes brother I wanna become an influence
Watching hc verma sir lecture to solve hc verma book 😂😂 not even kidding
Then you are an ultra legend 😂😂😂👏
Me too😂😂😂
Me too
But lectures are topic wise and not complete
😔
@@swapnilsingh5788 you are correct
I have been trying to understand this for years, and this is by far the best explanation that I have seen on the topic. Thank you!!
studying from you is my dream a legend teaching us is the greatest thing ever thank you sir my all concepts gets cleared.
Mai physics ka student hun but i want to feel. How it's possible?
The ease with which sir teaches is amazing.
Thanks. From this I was able to determine my bedroom is inertial. My laundry is not accelerating toward the washroom and I'm definitely not about to apply a force to it.
Wow, you're great man. Are you a Physics student??
@@name8166 fool he is in the field of physics then only he is watching this
@@rajnishkumar-ol3wu Okay, but 'fool' word doesn't sounds good bro 🙏🙏🙏.
I didn't say anything wrong. I was just asking
@@name8166 You replied to him much politely. Nowadays, people never reply like this.
@@mahigupta9717 Yeah, Humanity is best regardless how much knowledge anyone posses.
Eistein once said " Everything is relative. even my wife also"
His wife: now sign the divorce papers
😂🤭🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sweet home ALABAMA
unironically true
Thank you for suggesting and setting up a criteria for judging weather a frame of
reference is inertial or non inertial.
Most teachers I know are not so clear on this subject.
you are a legend sir plz keep doing videos i love physics because of you
I love your satisfying smile.. That says all about your passion on Physics!
I liked your English
@@devendramore9575 😍
3333333333333333333333333333433
This man needs no ruler scale or any compass. His hands are super still
Sir u are a true legend. I was struggling with this concept from last two days but finally i got it.
The way sir concludes at last... 😅😅 superb
What an excellent explaination it was! Each and every sentence sounds very logical.
Because this is science, everything in science is logical
the best explanation of inertial fram I've found on TH-cam so far
Bhi alok sir ka vhi hain
Thank you very much sir .I couldnot understand this concept for last 6 months but today i know all the physics of this by see this video .
Your simle at 5:00 was like....
Wait my children 😏physics isn't that easy
Ha ha 😈...
Yahi dekh bas tu
When he smiles, a smile my face also comes automatically
Sir , where can we find non inertial or pure inertial reference frames ?
in the end I got more confused than i had been ever before
you are very good at explaining, an asset of physics you are
thank u sir, i was some confused in book but know when i came to your channel my all doubts are clear
the best of physics teachers like alakh sir refer to ur book ur book is the best physics book and even ur teaching is really good
Great sir. Very clear & satisfied explanation. Thank you sir. #Respect
You are amazing and your book - concepts of physics is very helpful sir. Thank you sir
It was suuppeerrr! Whenever I see your video..first of all I give it a big fat thums up and then watch the video..
To explain S & S' frame you still need a frame . Then why it is not relative sir?
Exactly
No we don't need another frame to determine if s & s' is inertial or not. Sir just gave an example to explain that it's not relative, don't take it in wrong meaning. Either a frame is inertial or non inertial, there's no relativity between them.
We need to see the motion of frame that it is accelerating or not but not for determining inertial or non inertial
I love physics because of you..... I always used to read Concepts of physics by HCV sir
Sir if we have two frames moving with a constant acceleration @ and with respect to them there is one body moving with the same acceleration @ ,then will the frames be inertial or non inertial?
Respected sir then what about the reference frame for particles on a particle? simply if the first particle acts a force on a second from the top.
Thanks for this video sir..
I think if it mainly depends on where we are seeing if we are having same accelerated then it will be inertial to us and if some other guy is seeing us who is at a rest then he finds us at non inertial frame
Such a great explaination sir , the conclusion is if you observe acceleration on a frame then the frame is non-inertial .
Outstanding ....
Explanation ...👌👌👌
Perfect !! Just whats needed ! Crisp !
Greatest teacher of physics 🙌👌👌
Thank you sir for such beautiful concept.....
Sir why force is not depend on frame of reference. When we see a duster which is in rest the duster has net force 0 and when we see the same Duster on moving we see that it has an acceleration so how we can say that force is independent of frame of reference?
"If u love physics then look at the black board,but if u do not have any idea about physics then just stare to his eyes and his loveable innocent smile.obviously u will fall in love with H C Verma and in Physics.."
🇧🇩🇧🇩
True
@AP 309 so what
@AP 309 do you have any problem with that person, due to his country
@@itsDhiran those people sucks ! We give them their country but still they send rohingya and all , they don't want to friend with India
If so then, how to deal 'gorce' that is defined in Feynmann lecture sir?
Great sir
No one can chalange your knowledge. Jo log dislike karte hai unka mind perfect developed nhi ha physics ko samajhne ke liye i ya to vo jealous se bhare hai.
The legend himself !
Sir, if the person look the second frame that's S' from S then.. What would he consider?
Relative rest
Means inertial na ??
If two frame accelerate at same velocity but there is gravity effect comes on it how can we applied theory of relativity?
Sir teaches very well, he should write a book.
Very well explained. Great video for all students. Thank you ! 🙏
ye dislike kis nai ki hai sir ki video he is a God of physics or jo hc Verma sir ki videos like nhi karta Matlab vo physics nhi janata
If we find that in a given frame, an object being acted upon by a force and is accelerating with respect to the frame would that mean that the reference frame in which this object exist is inertial or non-inertial or no conclusion can be drawn?
Dhanyavaad guru ji.. 🙏
SIR IF IN CIRCULAR MOTION A PARTICLE GOES FROM POSITION 1 TO POSITION 2 WHILE THE POSITION 1 AND POSITION 2 ARE OPPOSITE TO EACH OTHER ON THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE CIRCLE AND THE FORCE IS ACTING TANGENTIALLY AT EACH POINT IN THE PARTICLES MOTION AND HAVE THE SAME MAGNITUDE 10N THEN WHAT IS THE WORD DONE BY THAT FORC3
Well this gave me inertiaception vibes... 😂
Lol😂
Nice sir. Lot of respect for you.
Once a legend always be a legend
How to know if a particle has outer force acting in it or not? Like if its non-contact force, only way we say its there is based on acceleration right?
HC Verma 😘😍 😘 the great one, 😍 respect
Your explanation is mind blowing
Nice video sir
Very nicely explained Sir.
Sir .. you are god of physics for me .. ✌🖤
Please tell explain, Sir if we moves with acceleratio and then see the another frame at rest of moving with constant velocity , in that case whether that frame would be inertial or non inertial
amazing teacher good content knowledge
👍
Yeh channel HC Verma sir aapki he kya ??
Sir if we consider any 2 particles of mass m1 and m2 respectively in a rigid body then we know that
the forces F12= F21 will cancel each other but they are acting on 2 different particle not on single particle ........please explain this
Sir you are the best concept explainer
Sir then are the concept of inertial frames applied to quantum mechs as you said the particle shoulf not be accelerated but acc to heisenburg uncertainity how is it possible that when we se a quantum particle it's not accelerated. Since you have mentioned that quantum and classical physics are different but just a question ?
at 5:00 i said the same thing to myself, and Sir and i smiled at the same time, this feeling of understanding physics 🥰😍
Me to bro
So can we say that non-inertial frame of reference is the indirect force experienced by an particle?
As in the bus example, the bus experienced a force due to which it stopped and which resulted making us go ahead, so we felt an indirect force which was acted upon the bus.
Thank you Professor!
Thanks for this video sir
Very good sir. Great.
Sir, I can know if the acceleration of a particle is 0 but how do I be sure that the force on it is also 0 , to know if my frame is inertial or non- inertial?
If acceleration of any body is 0, then it means force is obviously 0 because f=ma(Newton's 2nd law)
Then inertial frame is that which is not undergoing acceleration means acceleration is 0, such as rectilinear motion, object is at rest.
Since acceleration is 0,frame is inertial. Hope u get it...
Without considering pseudo force can l difference between inertial and non inertial frame
Sir kya aapko apne student Santosh Kumar singh yaad hai?
Sir if a person is standing (stationary) and a vehicle is passing with uniform velocity in front him then what will be the frame of reference acc to him?
Inertial
last part like "i m physics,jst hold my beer"😂😂
Agar ham Kisi aise frame mein hai jiska acceleration change ho raha hai usmein hame Kya feel hoga
Dear ideal sir,
Still the confusion remains the same.as u ended that the 3rd frame with respect to which there two frames are being obseved can be non inertial, then that 3rd frame is accelerating with acceleration 'a' then in that case will these frames s and s' be inertial or not with respect to that frame?
amazing sir !!!!!!!!!!!!! very much cherished by listenting to ur vedio...................
Superb sir👍👍💐💐
Sir i just wanted to be taught by you... It was my dream that came true!😇❤ feeling blessed!🙈❤😇
I am starting a pure research institute like xerox and paarc but will make it profitable.Donate on phonepe 7259293140.
Love u maAh SMARTY sir😘😘😘😘
How can the net force be zero but acceleration not be 0 at 3:30
Is it because the frame from which the particles is being observed is accelerating?
Thank you professor.
But how would someone know if the net force on that particle 3:29 is 0 from that frame of reference? If we know that there is an acceleration, then the only statement we can certainly make is that there is a net force acting on that particle.
Sir you are very amazing and your book concept
Sir i liked..ur laugh .. at the end of the video.. And really understood better ... than before.. Thankyou sir
He always brings a smile on my face
Absolutely love to study physics from him❤
A rotating disc with constant angular velocity is of which frame
Can we define frame of reference as platform upon which observation is made?
Yes, the point from which observation is made the point of reference and the plane in which the point is lying is the frame of reference
Yeah,,exactly
ekta srivastava is frame of reference a plane or space? Because I read somewhere that it is 3d.
@@jalilkhan6251 to understand a frame of refrence what i usually do is i imagine if my one eye is in the place of the point particle from which you want to observe...the world seen by that eye is the frame of refrence ..yes it is 3d.....for example if i want to talk about the frame of refrence of a 'fired' bullet..i think i am the bullet...then i would be at rest and the whole world would go backward...if the bullet was accelerated...then every thing in this world ( frame of refrence of bullet) would experience a pseudo force in the opposite direction ( except the bullet ..it is on rest)..and so on
..if there is some irregular shaped body..i would put my eye in the place of its centre of mass and then i will imagine the world from that perspective...but for imagining something from the ground frame i would just think of my self as a spectator observing the events happening standing on the ground...so yeah BE the thing from which you want to observer the frame( the world from that things perspective...hope this was helpful
@@satyampanchal-1016 thanks bro.You are good at simplifying concepts.In which class do you read bro?
I was actually confused in this example in HC Verma book and found it
Very good explanation of inertial and non inertial concept. That means to say whether two frames are inertial or non inertial it depends on the observer's frame.
Well said!!!
No! That is not what he said. He said whether a frame is inertial / non-inertial is absolute and not relative. From a frame if you see a particle not acted upon by any force accelerate, it is a non-inertial frame.
Yes is the answer for your question provided in description ... Since constant velocity means a =0 !!! 😌
I came here, didn't understand a thing then I read his book, OMG book explains better.
Could you let me know the book name and author name ?
@@wildkami1345 HC Verma
Thanku so much🙏 guru ji
Wonderful Sir!
गजब सर 👌👌🤝👍👍🇮🇳🇮🇳2nd like and comment sb mera hai🤣😁😅
Thank u sir! This video is helpful
In banking of roads car is in which frame
Amazing sir....... love from PAKISTAN
@Rahul Ranjan Bhai russia ka irodov bhi to India me famous hai ♥️🇮🇳 education knows no boundaries