GRS Bipod First Impressions

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 44

  • @John1911
    @John1911  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m not usually interested in bipods as rule. It’s a bipod. But I am super curious about this one. It’s big, but it QD’s off. So that’s nice.
    -Marky

    • @GRT1865
      @GRT1865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Marky you always find the most unique accessories for your guns and tractors. HAHAHA
      Stay safe. Take care. Have fun. 😎

    • @John1911
      @John1911  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh Lord! Don’t compare any of my firearms to my farm implement debacles!!!!
      Marky

    • @GRT1865
      @GRT1865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@John1911 you mean like "tractor booty chicks"? HAHAHA 😎

    • @John1911
      @John1911  ปีที่แล้ว

      😂

  • @rudolphferdinand3634
    @rudolphferdinand3634 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I bought the UTG OVER BORE bipod 3 position foldable 7-11" center height with 22* panning and 44* tilting for the cost of $142.00; the purchase was just to see if I would like it. The primary material is seen to be 6061-T aluminum. Another overbore bipod from the Elite Revolution website is priced at about $600.

    • @John1911
      @John1911  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I just googled that bipod. Looks REALLY interesting. Is it well made?
      Marky

    • @twissted1277
      @twissted1277 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@John1911 it's very well made. I have it on a NEMO ARMS Watchmen.

    • @John1911
      @John1911  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @twissted1277 looks like it!

    • @mylesharvey6488
      @mylesharvey6488 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😅 mine is built like a tank!

  • @generaliserad
    @generaliserad ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A sucker to carry, a dream to lead with on a GRS Bifrost for boar hunting. Fast and reliable interaction.

    • @John1911
      @John1911  ปีที่แล้ว

      “A sucker to carry?” Not sure I understand that statement. -Marky

    • @generaliserad
      @generaliserad ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just the general extra weight and forward weight displacement in steep terrain on the move, it's subjective ofc. But you can rip your clothing on to the non-lockable sharp foot teethes. Would recommend a touch and feel session before purchase. It's an absolute unit. Stellar stationary, don't get me wrong, i love it. Cheers from Sweden

    • @John1911
      @John1911  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah. I wouldn’t recommend this stock chassis for serious terrain use.
      Marky

  • @kamalmalik7690
    @kamalmalik7690 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very nice .

  • @michaelsaunders1658
    @michaelsaunders1658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looks like it is in the scope field of view. Any shadowing?

    • @John1911
      @John1911  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      None.
      That concern is a common misconception about rifle glads. The pupil and center of the eyebox line is above the accessory rail. Large objectives let in more total light. They don’t obscure your sight.
      Regards,
      Marky

  • @twissted1277
    @twissted1277 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have the UTG Over bore series.

    • @John1911
      @John1911  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Certainly a lot of the same function at the GRS.
      -Marky

    • @twissted1277
      @twissted1277 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I use it on my NEMO ARMS Watchmen. It's a tank.

  • @wvideoyahoodk
    @wvideoyahoodk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Considering the Ragnarok and bipod. I have a Blaser LRS 2 which I use together with my R93 Offroad Pro. Lots of barrels, Henholdt scope and Aimpoint Micro. Want just one rifle for long-range and hunting. Would you sell your LRS 2 ?

    • @John1911
      @John1911  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t sell rifles. I also have a tactical 2 so I know your LRS2 quite well.
      The R8 with the Ragnarok will give you more caliber options and accessory options. For example will you ever want to use NV or thermal to hunt? That would be WAY easier setup on the Ragnarok.
      The R8 is the future for Blaser. Over time the LRS will get harder and harder to get mags and parts for. However…we have working with people to have all of them made aftermarket.
      Perhaps you can find a R8 - Ragnarok to look at in person to make your decision?
      -Marky

    • @wvideoyahoodk
      @wvideoyahoodk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@John1911 Thanks for the answer. I was just asking for your opinion - not a trade. Love my 93 and have the barrels I need for years. It was a question about the GRS being better than the Ragnarok.
      Have enjoyed your channel for years. Escpecially when I many years ago bought my LRS2 in UK. Great serious job you do.
      Kind regards from Denmark

    • @John1911
      @John1911  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know you weren’t asking to trade. 😎
      If the LRS does everything you want, and you have the parts, barrels and bolts, just stick with that.
      The ONLY reason you would upgrade is wanting to hand NV on your LRS or wishing the latest and greatest caliber was made for it.
      Glad you like out content.
      Regards,
      Marky

    • @wvideoyahoodk
      @wvideoyahoodk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@John1911 Thank you so much :-) Don't know what I´ll do. Think my only concern is weight

    • @John1911
      @John1911  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The two biggest factors for weight, on either rifle, are barrel profile and scope weight.
      Put a skinny R93 barrel on your gun, cut it down as far as practical length wise, and buy a quality scope that isn’t heavy, and you are done.
      Buying a R8 with GRS won’t change anything from the LRS on that front. Put money into making the LRS go on a diet and achieve the same results, much cheaper.
      Also…just to be clear: the R8 receiver block with GRS chassis is no lighter than your LRS block and chassis. Might be a hair heavier technically.
      Regards,
      Marky

  • @tar6805
    @tar6805 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    $500 is a lot ? It retails for $1100 in Canada :(

    • @John1911
      @John1911  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well…1100 in monopoly money isn’t really any more than 500 US. 😜
      OK, I am sorry. It’s a joke. I don’t really think that. I just am having fun. I hope you guys in Canada finally can get rid of Trudeau and have the Pierre guy fix some of your gun rights. We are praying for you guys up there.
      -Marky
      John1911.com
      “Shooting Guns & Having Fun”

  • @bhi7165
    @bhi7165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That bipod is beefier than Marky

    • @John1911
      @John1911  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t know if that’s a compliment or a kick in my fat ass!!!??? :-) -Marky

    • @bhi7165
      @bhi7165 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@John1911 Either way, it doesn't look like you could ever break it.
      Unlike garden products 😬

    • @John1911
      @John1911  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      😅😅😅😅
      Marky

  • @Skilpadjie1
    @Skilpadjie1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At the end of the day. Nothing beats a Harris.

    • @John1911
      @John1911  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends on what you are trying to accomplish. The Harris wins at being fast to deploy.
      Regards,
      Marky

    • @Skilpadjie1
      @Skilpadjie1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@John1911 Ive ordered a GRS Hybrid stock for my 308. I would not mind getting the GRS bipod. But the price over the Harris puts me off. As it just does not give enough advantage over it for the price. Would have loved to get it though.

    • @John1911
      @John1911  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No doubt. The GRS is big money. Where it comes in handy for me is:
      1. Beefy enough for the big boomer calibers.
      2. Over/barrel design.
      3. Easy to load.
      4. Easy to take on and off in a shooting situation.
      But…other bipod makes off some or all of these as well.
      Regards,
      Marky

    • @EaglePass-w5n
      @EaglePass-w5n ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lots of things beat a harris

  • @John1911
    @John1911  3 ปีที่แล้ว

    john1911.com/grs-bipod-its-not-small/

  • @mannybarroga1878
    @mannybarroga1878 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Grs is not southpaw friendly I'm not touching any of their products with at all sorry

    • @John1911
      @John1911  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Eh…
      1. It’s a bipod.
      2. It is VERY expensive.
      3. Not sure about the ambi-complaint. I know the Ragnarok chassis I’m sticking this on is pretty ambi.
      -Marky

  • @fredwilliams7551
    @fredwilliams7551 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GEEZE WHAT AN ANNOYING SPEECH CADANCE GEEZE

    • @John1911
      @John1911  ปีที่แล้ว

      Can’t get ‘em all.
      -Marky

  • @EaglePass-w5n
    @EaglePass-w5n ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lost me at 500 buks

    • @John1911
      @John1911  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No doubt.
      -Marky