OLED vs QLED TVs 2022: Don't make a mistake!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
- Secure your crypto with Arculus: bit.ly/3qNejvq
Special discount when you use promo code "JonRettinger10"
Offer expires 3/31/2022. Offer may not be combined with any other coupons, discounts, offers, or promotions. Not valid on prior purchases. Void where prohibited. #ThisIsArculus
There are few things more complicated than finding the right TV to buy. For many of us, it's a big purchase, and you want to make sure you're getting something that's going to last and look good. So, to help everyone planning to buy a new TV in 2022, here's what to look for and the differences between OLED and QLED. Let's break it down!
OLED vs QLED - Part 1: • OLED vs QLED TV: Don't...
FEATURED PRODUCTS
TCL 65-inch 5-Series QLED TV amzn.to/3s2oonE
Sony 65-Inch A90J OLED TV: amzn.to/3IGfJxU
GEAR: kit.co/JonRett...
My music comes from Musicbed, check them out: share.mscbd.fm/...
Our Motion and Final Cut Pro X templates: www.motionvfx....
Follow me!
Website: www.jon4lakers...
Instagram: / jonrettinger
Twitter: / jon4lakers
Facebook: / jonrettingeryt
I can't take this comparison seriously when he's comparing a top-tier OLED to a TCL as opposed to the top tier Samsung
So true
@@nr.1176 feel the same about your opinion. Even the well thought out ones
@@HolisticHunt even more true
You obviously have not seen the picture quality of the TCL 8 Series. It's not as good a picture of OLED but about 90% to 95% there. Definitely QLED quality.
The differences are inherent to the technique though, no matter if its samsung or tcl, qled remains a glorified va panel
Having multiple of both LGs OLED and Samsung's QLED, I am all-in on Samsung QLED.
1) Costs less
2) OLED has burn-in, despite their lies that it doesn't. This alone is a show stopper for me. Very noticeable, very annoying.
3) I have Samsung TVs outside. One was on a mobile stand and got hit by a large amount of rain because I failed to put it somewhere safe. Thought it was toast. Right after, it looked like washed out mountains from water in the layers of the screen. However, within weeks of use it just faded back out completely. Years later, still going strong.
4) Warranty. I always buy the extended warranty (4 or 5 years). Samsung has always honored it, no questions. LG refused to fix the TV with burn in it claims can't happen.
5) Samsung's are much better in bright light.
Will never buy an LG again.
Samsung's aren't brighter, QLED is. OLED is superior in every way beside brightness. Whether it's Samsung or LG's OLED. QD-OLED from Samsung is getting almost as bright as QLED now though.
QLED is cheaper and brighter. If your TV is not going in an extremely bright room and you have enough money / want the best, then OLED is always superior. The viewing angels and colours are just amazing. I myself would go for Sony's OLED but all 3 (LG, Samsung and Sony) make amazing TV's.
@Max007 LOL. QLED may be brighter, but it is far from cheaper. It also fails far, far easier. Period. LG alao sucks in warranty. No comparison. Period. Take it to the bank.
@@trevorwesterdahl6245 QLED is way cheaper :) Idk if you have this thing called Google, but if you do, you could just check it out yourself. OLED is, definitely on the smaller models, close to 100% more expensive.
Cheapest QLED at best buy is around 350$ and the same size in OLED starts at about a 900$. For bigger sizes the difference is less.
OLED does fail easier but it's not like the old days anymore. I have 2 OLED panels which have no signs of burn-in whatsoever after 4 years.
LG having bad warranty has nothing to do with a QLED vs OLED comparison.
@@maxjames00077 Now you compare tiny, not mentioned, TVs. I have been referiing to 65" or larger LG OLED vs Samsumg QLED. LG is charging MUCH more for their OLED. Won't buy LG again. Period.
@@maxjames00077 Sorry, read my comment more closely... It was a typo to say QLED. My comment was about OLED (the version that sucks and costs more).
Got a 65-inch LG OLED specifically for occasional evening movies. I knew the requirements for dim lighting, and in that environment it's just brilliant. The only thing I regretted later was not getting the 75-inch panel :)
I use a 55 LG OLED for 2 years now. I'm satisfied with it; bought it with some discount at the time and use it mainly as an all-in-one. I use it as pc screen, game on it and watch movies. I know that the only negative is the burn-in, but to prevent that I don't really put my brightness that high. Usually at 40-45, which in the evening can still be very bright. Maybe it's not a positive when watching GOT season 8... but who wants to rewatch that garbage anyway. As for most movies, I tend to watch the older classic quality stuff instead of the garbage that Hollywood is turning out for the past 5 years.
although the next size is 77inch
I feel your pain, but the 77 inch was not available when I bought the 65. Now I own both the 65 and the 77 inch and the 77 inch is AWESOME.
@@stijnvdv2 sounds more like movie complaining than TV rating
dont buy QLED lmfao garbage, technology is gonna die in 1-2 years l0l
And to confuse things… there will be new TVs this year with Quantum Dot OLED panels.
Rambling... just give us the facts...
Baseline -
OLED: If have Budget and low Sunlight coming-in
QLED: If you're low on budget or having huge sunlight coming
Kinda except good QLEDs cost the same of OLEDs.
Samsungs mini led QLED models cost the same as LGs oleds.
I got one myself and am pretty happy with it. The black levels are pretty good and it can get really bright
@@twennywonn Only if you mean "good QLED" to only mean Neo QLED, which is so dumb when we see what amazing technology even budget QLEDs can have, such as the 2020/2021 TCL Class 5 and Class 6 series which both have full array backlighting, local dimming (true blacks), Dolby Vision, and mini-LED for the Class 6 Series, as well as still having amazing colors compared to most TVs in the last 5 years except OLED. And the Class 5 Series is only around $500 for a 50" (I personally got it on sale for $430), meaning you can get great technology and excellent features at a really low cost. And it's not just for people on a low budget either, if someone wants a ~75" TV and is considering QLED and OLED, a 77" LG C1 as compared to a 75" TCL Class 6 Series mini-LED is $2900 vs $1300 (USD, going off of the current sale prices on Best Buy for both TVs), or literally less than half the price, and the TCL still has better brightness on account of the mini-LED, over a 200 nit advantage in terms of max brightness. And if someone has a strict budget of $2000, which isn't that unreasonable for a working-class individual, then if they went OLED they'd be sacrificing a lot of screen real estate compared to a similarly priced QLED which is generally going to have around 20" on it. I will agree that Neo QLED is so close to OLED in price that it makes it not worth it in 90% of instances, but don't sleep on these excellent budget QLEDs with amazing tech, they can make a great option for a lot of people such as myself
@@burnoutcollectivist4660 I stopped reading when I saw TCL.They do make great value TVs but just not great TVs IMO. But you do you man be happy with what you have.
@@twennywonn I dunno why you would respond to a comment you didn't read, but you do you, your time is your own lol
Nice video. I just got a 65” LG C1 and I’m pretty happy with it.
Me too. Its great!
Same here man, my picture setting is standard I don’t want to over work it and burn out the pixels
@@marentes133
Adjusting the picture settings shouldn't damage the pixels
This is a tv im going to get when the c2 drops so I can get at a better price or during the holidays this year
@@bignbad47I got a C1 but I’m def considering getting the C2 come Black Friday stuff. The C1 is perfection only negative I have is lack of brightness. The Evo panels of the c2 should solve some of those issues tho.
QLEDS can get close to OLEDs when it comes to black levels especially with a good local dimming algorithm. But OLEDs can't even get near the level of brightness a QLED can hit. I'll take the picture which can show me a brighter highlights over "perfect blacks".
Thanks for Watching!!! ♉ Contact me for INTERACTION on CLAIMING via handle above. You have been selected among our lucky winners!
I agree
So, that's the main difference? Thanks! Saved me quite a few minutes
I own both the 65" and the 77" LG OLED sets. My personal make or break decision came down to not only the black level, but especially the viewing angles. Both technologies have an outstanding picture when you view directly from the front, but make sure you are comfortable with the black levels & viewing angles vs. the price before you buy. And for you gamers, I set up the "instant response" game port on the LG 77" to an HP OMEN 45L with GeForce RTX 3080 and run MS Flight Sim 2020 at 4K resolution with no jitters. Flying the MSFS 2020 / TOP GUN / F-18 low level challenges are truly amazing on this configuration.
how do i enable instant responce? I got the lg c2
I have heard on one review that the black levels on the Samsung S95B are better than the LG C2 & G2 ?
@@breaker1685 It's the same panel, LG makes them and sells them to Samsung.
@@huhdidwhat I think for the S95B Samsung they made their own panels - although Samsung have used LG panels prior to this on some models
If you get a QLED, make sure it has FULL ARRAY local dimming. (Not edge-lit) Helps with the contrast ratio.
Solid advice.
@@jon4lakers That's something you should've mentioned in the video don't you think? 🤔
I was trying to explain that to a customer but he said the q70a was good enough smh. I can usually guarantee a sale on a full array like a q80 or an x90 but man this guy was stubborn
@@doctorfresh3856 Was that a thing in January 2022 tho?
@@Jokamutta Been a thing for years.
No one seems to mention the best tv depends on your watching habits. If you watch TH-cam,etc you will eventually have burn in and image screen retention with the lg oled. After 5 years my C7 had image retention and the colors were shot. Pink was purple/orange was green. Peoples skin color looked horrid. I went with a nano cell this time around. I cant see buying a new oled every 5 years. My plasma lasted 15.
technology has increased a lot since your C7
@@sgrulido ok..u spend the 1000...use the tv for youtube and other streaming.
My colors were also totaly off after 5 years.
Get back to me in 5 years and let me know how u make out.
The tech isn't even 10 years old yet. When pink shows up as purple, orange looks like green...and reg tv everyone looks yellow 5 years after purchase ?
New....its was best pic money could buy...5 years later its not worth viewing and junk!
My 480's lasted 20 years...my plasma 15 with barely any color loss.
Oled...less than 5 years.
Don't know about everybody else. But most don't have 1400 to throw away every 5 years.
I went nano cell this time..half the money
@@z74birdman not sure everyone spends 8000+ hours in front of a TV
@@z74birdman What is your phone screen? Most smartphones use oleds for years now with a lot of static elemets and there are no issues so there is no reason to think burn-in or color fringing is an issue if the technology gets sufficiently advanced.
I don't think Samsung is committed to QLED since they are switching production over to QD-OLED 2022 :^) Your info is about one year out of date
Nice to know that you're removing comments about NFTs...
Please read up on the dangers and risks of NFTs.
Just bought a Samsung QLED 65" 80A panel for $730 + tax usd with a two year warranty from MicroCenter. Samsung warranty is nearly worthless. Dealing with a local store is much easier, if something goes belly up.
Liked it so much, I bought the 75" version for my mom's living room.
$840usd at MicroCenter
I've had an LG OLED since 2017. I've had the panel replaced 3 years into it for significant burn-in. I understand that they are addressing that issue still and I honestly don't trust they've solved it from all I've researched. The TV is now in need of yet another new panel and as it's out of warranty (LG will honor one panel replacement out-of-warranty apparently). I'm not convinced the issue is solved. Therefore, I personally would NOT recommend an OLED until they solve the problem.
Would you say QLED is a big jump from regular LED?
I got my LG OLED in 2018 and haven't experienced any burn-in. I use it as a monitor for work and play. I figured I'd have some burnt-in taskbars by now, so I guess I'm fortunate. Honestly, I'd still go for another OLED at this point. The perfect blacks I can't give up! Also my friend's Qled artifacts like crazy in dimly lit scenes of movies and TH-cam vids. I simply just ask how he lives with this lol, a few extra years of TV life when it looks like ass the entire time is beyond me.
@@Nahinalau Do you know what brand Qled it was? I’ve been thinking about getting the TCL R656 myself.
@Ugo Ewulonu sure man. I'm hanging with him tonight ill get you that in a couple hours
@@Nahinalau 👍🏾
Don’t make a mistake! Stop watching channels with fake thumbnails!
Been watching since the techno buffalo days but lost track of your channel over the years today I saw a friendly face and decided to stop by. Glad your still doing well Jon, take care.
You couldn't pay me to buy an OLED. Way too expensive, too expensive, too thin and easily damaged, and their biggest talking point is what you CAN'T see. As long as it doesn't look like an early 2000's TFT panel, I don't give a damn about black levels and viewing angles. Really, who's going to stand BESIDE a tv to watch it? Not to mention the risk of screen damage from stationary graphics. Just not worth it.
My Samsung q9fn still looks great! I enjoy every moment with ps5! No burn in risk. Great black. Great colors. Great brightness!
I have the GQ65QN90A and in combination with the PS5 it's just awesome
Samsung Qleds are elite, I have had an Oled LG and a Qled Samsung still as of today I’m taking Samsung’s Qled all day everyday they have perfected their pictures through Qled for so many years that it’s just superior in my opinion. Now on the flip side Oled yes has deeper black coloring and a more organic look but like the burn it defect I had left my tv on overnight and my Xbox dashboard was burnt into my screen for the whole entire next 3-4 days and even after that if you got close enough you could still see it ever since then I’ve just been scared from spending extra money on a tv that I have to be careful with and set timers for watch times so it wouldn’t burn in. But overall Samsung Qled can never go wrong with.
Yeah. Many gamers advised me to choose a QLED over OLED cause of "burn in" and I didn't wanna deal with the constant anxiety and waste 1k
This comment helps alot!! Im a gamer and i was stuck on oled or QLed but because of the burn im going Qled
Thanks for this. I'll be getting a QLED tv this time around.
I have an OLED now, but it isn't great for gaming in my opinion due to the constant burn ins I get.
What ended up being better bro?
If you watch a lot of TV or leave the TV on for long hours daily, you should be aware that OLED TVs dim overtime with useage. Today's TVs are built to last about 5 to 8 years, and with technology's fast pace movement, you will likely need to replace your TV by then. A good reason not to overspend on your TV.
I was surprised you didn't even mention Samsungs QD-OLED tech that is coming this year which promises both brighter and more colorful OLED than LG.
And it’s also gonna be ridiculously expensive and out of consideration for most consumers
What’s the point of discussing TVs that are not yet in production?
@@justsaying993 $3,000 for a 55 inch and $4,000 for a 65 inch isn't "ridiculously expensive" considering the new tech involved.
Most people expected it to be close to $8,000-$10,000.
Also, the A95K isn't targeted at average consumers to begin with. The TV is aimed at Videophiles.
Samsung have a tendency to promise a lot over LG but is very hit or miss at delivering.
The amount of Samsung 8K TVs returned to my store this year has been incredible to see. Based on that I would advice being very cautious when buying into Samsungs new QD-OLED TVs when they drop. Fingers crossed they can pull it off.
@@MR_K-RO why the returns?
This video is misleading, and LED vs OLED comparison videos are whack and people spend more time on them than they should. They complain and b**** about things like Dolby Vision, burn in, brightness and so on. The fact of the matter is that it all boils down to the quality of the content you are watching that was put out by the creator. Also unless you will be buying an OLED and an LED to have at home and look at it side by side every day with unrealistic marketing videos, these comparisons don’t mean sh*t, because whether you buy the LG C1, Sony A90J, or Samsung QN90 they are all great TVs and you will enjoy them. They may have better contrast, better brightness, whatever the case may be, but they are good TVs at the end of the day.
I got the LG C2 42 inch for my desktop PC which also doubles as bedroom TV...couldn't be happier. Best display I've ever bought.
worst comparison tcl and Hisense are no where near Samsung
Exactly; those are cheap televisions and they cannot compare to a Samsung. I pre-ordered the Samsung 4K OLED 55 inch television and I am excited. Ignore the haters out there.
My 5 year old OLED out performs my new U8G in every way apary from brightness which honestly is a waste of time if it greys put. So OLED for the win!!
So which one is superior and why? He kind of acts like a politician and doesn't actually tell you.
Also if both have their own advantages why not make a TV that has both QLED and OLED?
First off all, a neo qled actually has a lot of advantages, and for a brighter room, a qled will outperform an oled everytime.
And a top tier qled is just like an oled to the naked eye, i have had both and ofcourse both are great. But with my bright living room the qled performs way better during the day
Your opinion make sense, qled are generally easier to adapt to living rooms, as they are generally bright rooms in any house, but the new QD-OLED / MLA technology OLEDs, have to say really come close to brightness to top tier QLED making everyone question if QLED does still make sense at this point (if we don’t factor the burn in issue), microled will come might be the next big thing
Just got my Lg c1 65 yesterday delivered and I’m so happy with it , can’t complain.👍👍👍
Don't make a mistake! You have to figure it out yourself!
There is much desinformation in this video, as you clearly aren't that much into the tv industry so I will clear up this for many of you:
1. This video should me named OLED vs LCD, because QLED is only a marketing name and lcd which is QLED isn't strictly better than one which isn't
2. Normal LCDs can produce colors even better than QLEDs, there isn't any correlation between that
3. QLED ISN'T a Quantum Dot display, it uses quantum dot enhancement film to enhance colors, not create them. This is done like in a regular lcd, there are also other similar technologies like nanocell or triluminos (which was first technology to use quantum dots, but have moved on to different solution), only QD Display available on the market is QD OLED and in the future QNED or QDEL
4. Samsung isn't commited to QLED, it's most well known from OLEDs but they only had one OLED tv, this year this changes and they will once again have OLED models
5. Burn in can also happen in LCD tvs so also QLED but it is much less common
6. There are lcd tvs even thinner than OLEDs, for example TCL OD Zero models
7. There are really cheap OLEDs like Vizio, LG A1, Hisense A8G, maybe not as much as the cheapest QLEDs but cheaper than most of them
8. MiniLED are here now, but they aren't next generation of QLED, because not all of them use quantum dots, there are more like next generation of Full array local dimming but not strictly better, just different, microled is actually more of a lcd successor as it also uses normal leds but smaller, QD-OLED is a next generation of OLED and first real Quantum Display
9. QLED isn't new, first tvs which worked like it were here almost 10 years ago and every year lcds are really similar sometimes even worse
I wonder what the split would be if an LG OLED would be pitched against a new QDLED. I just bought an 85” QDLED two days ago and the picture is just perfect, and substantially cheaper than OLED.
@@rockyj5047 well I can say from own experience that Qled blacks are black AF. The blackest blacks are largely due to the mini-leds dimming though, which works real real well but when it dims when it shouldn’t you see behind the magic.
@@rockyj5047 no, the QD OLEDs will have exactly the same black levels as both are self lit. The only thing that can make a QD OLED look worse is a too aggressive anti glare layer. The QD OLED display technology is an improvement over traditional OLED in every aspect
@@rockyj5047 so what was I wrong about? Do you even know how QD works?
@@rockyj5047QD OLED is a type of OLED. The S95B or the A95K for instance have deep blacks like any other OLED TVs.
QDLED=QLED. Redundancy is redundant.
11:11 mini is not smaller than quantum I don't know how it could be considered to be the next generation.
Also how is micro the next generation of OLED??
Im totally fine with my 65" Qled and its local dimming since 1 year. I dont wanted to buy a black mirror for my living room. Dont understand this qled bashing.
Because people have a bias for OLED. QLEDS are bright and can show highlights better. Highlights are more than just small stars or small areas of the screen. Highlights can be the brightness of the sun on the screen which a QLED represents better especially in hdr. Ever time reviewers talk about OLED they talk about black levels, but OLED are bad with brightness which makes colors and vividness in color saturation because they are dim.
I'm not spending +$1k. I recently bought a hisense u7k for $550 and it it's a massive improvement to the current tv I have.
Great video! I work in home theater at Best Buy and talk about this stuff all the time!
Ehh…. 2021 Samsung QLED does turn of the backlight in zones completely. I have a 55Q80A and a black wall. The screen just looks as if the tv is off in blacks. The colors are okay xtremely good, and so is the brightness.
NEO-QLED’s have much smaller local dimming, using Mini-Led’s. That seems to be the future since LG also finally ditched their OLED tech for QNED ( Mini-Led )
Simply for the peak brightness and burn in problems.
Just get a Samsung QLED if you dont want to break the bank and have great quality.
OLED is a bit kick in the face with colors as QLED is more realistic and subtle.
I get black with the level with the Roku 70” Qled Dolby version Dolby Atmos local diming in it’s from Walmart on the Walmart app
I took on the role as “tech support” for my family at 14 not knowing what I was getting myself into...
Blooming is the only reason, ONLY reason people don’t go for led TVs. Hilarious really, I went round my uncles who has the QN95A and I didn’t see any blooming at all really, like nothing. It’s such a nit pick..... speaking of nits OLED doesn’t have a high nit count.
Thanks for Watching!!! ♉ Contact me for INTERACTION on CLAIMING via handle above. You have been selected among our lucky winners!
I currently have the Samsung AU8000 LED and am thinking of upgrading to the TCL R656 QLED since I have until 1/14/23 to return the AU8000. Would you say it’s a big jump in picture quality and that it’d be worth it?
I mean, don’t take my word, but I’d say it’s worth it. LED to QLED is a huge jump. You’ll definitely see a difference. It honestly may depend on the price. If it’s $600-700 more then the AU8000 then maybe not. But I think it’s a pretty good purchase just because you get QLED
@@idkbro1228 Yeah I’m sure it is, but all the QLEDs I’ve looked at have issues like grey uniformity issues or something like that that’s a deal breaker for me. The TCL R656 doesn’t do 480p upscaling well and I have some older video game consoles that I want to look good.
I don’t understand the complain
About OLED not being bright. I had to lower the brightness cause I was blinded watching a movie on my LG C1
if you have bright room a oled dont make sense.
Just to say qled and qd display are two different thing qled puts the quantum dot in the backlight to get high purity blue light so the color converting layer can achieve better color qd display aka qd-oled uses the quantum dots as the color converting layer it’s self or in front of the backlight to make the rgb sub pixels
All demonstration inside tv OLED or qled looking most butter colour you but not same signal have like demo hahaha 😂
I think it depends on where you are using the TV. If you are using in a bright room with natural light a QLED in that room is probably a better choice. OLED is stunning in a darker room with colors that can really pop against the true black. I bought my first LG OLED (55") back in 2016. I have since added a 65" LG OLED CX for the living room TV and a 65" C2 series LG OLED EVO as a computer/XBOX Series X screen. Burn in basically a non issue unless you play a game with a static images on the screen or TV channels with static images or a constant runner (think the bottom of screen on a news channel that has a stream of info scrolling across the screen). After owing an OLED now for 6 years (I still use the 55" LG OLED) I have 1 stuck/dead pixel and none of the burn in.
I'm thinking about getting the C2.
I play games daily, and the LG OLED gaming features caught my interest.
I am worried about burn in. As games have static things on screen at all times. Healthbars, HUD, etc.
I hear mixed messages. Some say it's a non-issue these days. Other say they got burn in withing 3 months. So...
I figure I should be fine. As I play many different games, and usually only for a couple hours a day. With the TV not in use the rest of the time.
But I'm still reluctant. I don't want that constant nagging worry in the back of my mind. That every time the TV is on the pixels are slowly dying and running out of their limited lifespan. So I'm torn.
If it lasts long enough I won't have a problem. I would hope for around 5 years. I guess they also have a warranty against burn in for that long...
I dunno, I'm conflicted.
@@sawdust8691 Those burn ins must be some old TV or something. C1 improved the heat dissipation from thr CX models, I'd assume the C2 is better. I play on my CX everyday, even on games with long standing HUDs like Cyberpunk, Super Smash, or Splatoon didn't burn anything in so I don't think it's a concern
@@RaigonZelo ya... it's probably fine.
I'll keep an eye on the prices. It's the time of year where they drop the lowest.
I saw a while ago it was around 1700 for a 55in. C2, which is my preferred size for the room.
It's already dropped to 1300. And still dropping. So I'll keep an eye out.
The burn-in on my LGs is horrific. A major issue. LG refused to do anything. Samsung's have no burn in. Samsung honors their warranty. LG does not. Will never buy an LG again. FYI: I have multiple TVs for a sports bar setting. Leave up an image that has, say an ESPN logo in same spot, it burns in badly. Horrifically. No thanks. If you just watch movies/TV shows, you are probably fine. FYI: the Samsung's have been outdoors for years. Only had one issue where I accidentally let one get rain soaked. Looked like washed out mountains. Self-healed in days. Samsung's are just durable, cost less, honor their warranty, and I never had one person say the LG image looked better. In bright light, the Samsung's are better. Everyone notices.
Also FYI: All my TVs are 64" or larger.
I have an inexpensive 55" TCL QLED, I am seeing the dreaded "blooming" effect, but guess what? It's not that bad. It's a very slight effect that only happens occasionally, and I wouldn't pay quadruple the price for a TV that doesn't have any bloom whatsoever. The image quality you get for a decent QLED is absolutely fantastic. In my opinion you should just pocket the rest of the money.
Viewing angles are a different story. Luckily, my living room is only setup for one couch facing the TV, so it's not a big deal, but yes, the off axis viewing angles do look bad. If you need great viewing angles, be sure to read up on that, and you might have to pay more either for a higher end QLED or an OLED.
shouldve waited and go the ONN qled premuim model for around the same price its a better brand
@@phillipallen5564 I don't think waiting is necessary in the low-mid TV segment. There's nothing revolutionary right around the corner at that price, things are just gradually getting better. I would advise most people to just buy a TV when they're ready.
It is refreshing to find such unbiased and easily understood advice. Thanks
this is from tcl. a bit dont dismiss it all. actually pretty basic advice, with mild propaganda but do liststen to the basic facts.
It’s pretty biased
unbiased?? he is comparing a top tier OLED to a TCL instead of a top tier QLED like Samsung
I have a LG 97" G2 4K HDR Smart OLED evo TV With AI ThinQ and I love it very much, not much of an issues here.
I went to the store to buy a Samsung 8K QLED, but left with a 4K LG G1 OLED and couldn’t be happier. The picture side by side was so much more impressive on the LG. The Samsung upscaling wasn’t great, maybe I’ll look again in a couple of years.
Just ordered a G1. Looking forward to gaming on it, upgrading from a 2016 Sony xbr 4K tv
Good luck with the burn in 1-2 years down the line.
8K TV way to earlier
Smart decision. 8K is purely a marketing gimmick to get people to spend more money. There's virtually no 8K content right now anyway.
Hell yeah, I got the LG G1 EVO and my Xbox Series X and PS5 look great on it!
Imagine spending all this money for the the best image quality possible and then getting burn ins in your 3000 usd TV pannel. I will prefer less than ideal blacks, thank youl.
Me too
OLED is amazing... hands-down.
🙋🏾♂️🙋🏾♂️
What about the possibility of burn in?
@@ugoewulonu4936 The new ones move the pixels of logos around slightly to avoid burn-in. The new OLEDS also have a pixel refresh that can be set.
@@mic7856I bought the tv lg oled55c2
Idk about the screen burning and I'm a little concerned.
@@ugoewulonu4936 There is a very high chance you wrote this comment from a phone with oled screen. You should be able to tell yourself.
@@w04h Phones don’t stay on as long as TVs do, so there’s less chance for burn in to occur.
Why would you compare TCL with Sony? Possibly the most one sided review possible,
It's a little but biased though, shouldn't be comparing OLED vs QLED, it should be OLED vs Neo QLED which is a complete different technology, as a TV specialist honestly I can say Samsung Neo QLED is blowing OLED out of the water at the moment. Higher brightness than QLED and closer to true black too so it is almost a 2 in 1.
could you describe the disadvantages of using a Samsung QM series for my living room? (Sorry, you mentioned that you were specialist so I figured I'd pick your brain)
I have QN90A SAMSUNG NEO.. MMMMMM SO MUTHER .... PICTURE QUALITY. I DONT KNOW WHAT YOU TALKING ABOUT I WENT TO BEST BUY SAW SOMS OLED AND I FEEL LIKE ALL BEST BUY ARE REFLECTED THERE AND I CANT SEE WHAT THE TV BRING TO SHOW. GOES TO SAMSUNG AND BLOWS AWAY.
Thanks for Watching!!! ♉ Contact me for INTERACTION on CLAIMING via handle above. You have been selected among our lucky winners!
I have OLED and QLED and i love them both. But OLED is best for gaming to me, and as for movies and tv shows though it's both OLED and QLED. But i'm excited for MicroLED but it's gonna be years until its affordable for us.
Do you play with consoles or PC?
OLED is the worst display for gaming
@@cqllel5186 Why? I haven't had any problems when it came to burn in.
@@DedricSilva You haven't had any problems when it came to burn in *Yet
@@cqllel5186 its been 2 years since ive bought my lg cx oled and ive used it for gaming, movies, pc monitor and left it on all the time. No burn in. After a few months of owning an oled, you stop caring about burn in cause its so insignificant
obviously OLED has the best picture quality , but for me QLED makes more sense and it's not that far behind OLED too
Nothing beats Oled and now they can almost get as bright ass Qled sooo pretty much game over.
Almost? Nowhere near as bright
@@andrew72329 its pretty bright enough. QLed is trashy blacks. No amount of brightness is going to save the picture quality.
@@thomasfischer9259 it depends. If your room is pretty bright youd be better off with a qled. Oled offers a better picture overall but Qled has its followers too, myself included.
@@thomasfischer9259 go check out the qn90b QLED.it beats any OLED right now
@@truthx7 shut up samsung
Awesome video, but get that NFT Crypto garbage out of here lol
Picked up a 65” a80j from sony and i have zero complaints. Qled just didnt have what i cared for which was near perfect black levels. I would recommend a qled all day though.
Does this play all video formats through usb port?
I bought the 65 and my only complaint was that I didn’t purchase the 77… well the 77 will arrive next Saturday. I’m freaking excited
@@user-oj8ss4zq3x how do you like it?
@@Dmahmoud17 it was definitely nice but I ended up returning it because my wife wanted a brighter tv so I ended up getting the qn 85b 85in. I know it has its short comings but overall its a great tv
Why aren't you bringing up the fact that OLED inherently degrades with time? The more the pixels light up the less bright they can become. That is what creates the "burn in" effect. The pixels that are used more tend to stand out by being less bright than the surrounding pixels. The fix for this is to try to degrade the brightness of all pixels evenly. So, in time the TV's image becomes dimmer and dimmer.
I’ve owned (2) LG OLED TV’s. Both had horrible burn-in after 1 1/2 years. I now own (3) Samsung QLED’s and will never buy a OLED again.
I chose QLED over OLED because I mainly use my tv connected to my laptop and since burn in is still a thing with OLED, and I don't want to have to worry about that. I don't want my browser to be burned in. I never regretted the decision.
What the heck is burn in ?
Same. I got a QLED over an OLED cause I hear it's generally not good for gaming due to burn in issues.
@@hitokiribattousai7703 how do you like it so far . I’m trying to get a 60 inch real soon .
@@richardwalker6004 so burn in is like u see a picture of a flower for a long time and after a long time when ur watching Netflix u see the flower photo under it, its very annoying i have it in my phone when i set my phone to a White screen i see my TH-cam start screen burnt in the screen. So its always there forever
@@Niick_18 thank you . I’m getting my 1st qled ever so I know it’s going to be a upgrade.
I'll take lack of burn in by design any day since I use the display as a secondary monitor that has static window items on it nonstop. Unlike most brainwashed people, I don't like to treat tech/equipment as disposable like most people are taught to think these days. I've seen too many comments of people saying they'll just keep being oleds despite having burn in. Go ahead, waste thousands of dollars teaching companies that you're willing to waste thousands of dollars on a steppingstone already outdated technology (I'm not arguing there's a direct replacement yet, but by its nature/design it's a dead-end unless people keep wanting to blow their money replacing them every cycle).
You also forgot to mention that OLED is prone to discoloration over time with the burn ins. Every OLED device I've ever owned from TVs to phones have those same exact issues. I'm moving on to QLED. I need my TV to last longer than a couple of years
Never had that with any product, got plenty of oled screens in the house. Also, on newer oled products, there are built in safety procedures to prevent such a thing from happening
@@TimecraftGamingSjors the OLED I purchased in 2017 has the same exact features today. Pixel refreshing nonsense just makes the screen darker. Doesn't fix the retention. Doesn't fix the discoloration. You can keep buying that garbage all you want. No one is paying me to say this. I DC what you think. I know my experience with them
@4K 60FPS if oled didn't have those two issues I mentioned then nothing could beat the image quality. QLED would be second place
Bought a 65” LG OLED in 2020 for £1800 and it lasted just over 6months before I started having issues and is now long dead. Bought a 55” Samsung QLED in 2022 for downstairs and loved the features and picture quality, which made me replace the broken LG OLED with a 75” Samsung QLED and I love it.. yeah the black isn’t as black but I absolutely love it and will probably never buy a LG to again.
The main reason for "burn in" on OLEDs is their horrible factory calibration with white balance. Which directly effects how much light the white LEDs are emitting. For example LG commonly has the color temperature of their LEDs from the factory set to 20k to 30k kelvin. With the white balance set as low as it can go. You are going to be at a less psychotic 5.8k to 6k kelvin. That's within the normal range for LEDs to operate.
Oled is best always yes but my guy how you gonna compare qled vs oled using a bottom shelf qled and the best oled on the market😂
He was comparing the technology, not the specific brand of TVs. He just had them there as examples of each of the technologies
Someone that has both an oled and a Mini L LED TVI would highly recommend the oled. If you have small children that will be touching it or using it get the qled. Nothing comes close to oled insane how good it looks
I'm torn between the LG OLED 4K, or LG MiniLED 4K.
QLED vs OLED is like the painter saying:" Everyday I practice my picture comes closer and closer to resemble Mona Lisa! I think that I shall make it some day"!;-) There is nothing comparable to an OLED! Like there is nothing comparable to a "Mona Lisa"!
I bought a Samsung 65" Q80 QLED, and I love it. The cost difference for a comparable OLED just wasn't worth it.
This is what I’m thinking, as much as the oled sounds better in certain ways I game far too much to risk burn in
It’s absolutely worth the price difference.
@@bobsucks9647 There is so little risk of burn-in. People make it sound much more prevalent than it is. It used to be a real issue. Now you have to absolutely abuse the TV to get it, unless you just get a bad panel, which can happen. OLEDs have several features now that help minimize the risk. My LG C2 has a setting that slightly shifts the image over time (which is impossible to notice unless you maybe do a time lapse video with a camera). It also runs a pixel refresh when the TV is turned off, after every 4 hours of accumulated watch time. Then there’s the logo dimmer. When the TV sees a logo sitting in the same spot, such as on a channel like Fox, it can dim it. As well as other features. Don’t let people scare you away. OLED is far better.
@@frostyone182 really depends on how much of a couch potato one is
I have 65 inch oled cx and Samsung ks8000 and for me the ks8000 absolutely blows away the lgcx... am very disappointed with lgcx my old ks8000 still looks beautiful and the picture pops !!!!! Lxcx is very dull and lifeless
Thanks for this, now based on the positioning of my TV and the sunlight that I get I am able to conclude on QLED
Did the same. Got an OLED for my bedroom and a QLED for my sunny living room
Misleading thumbnail picture. High end Qled colors are much brighter and pop more than oled. QN90a for example.
Thanks for Watching!!! ♉ Contact me for INTERACTION on CLAIMING via handle above. You have been selected among our lucky winners!
I have my LG CX for over 2 years now, this thing is on like 8 to 10 hours a day no problem here with burnin. I game, watch tv and use it as my monitor for my pc. The burnin problem is non existend, the tv gives you plenty of options that does not happen.
Now If i may ask, what games do u play? And does it have fixed content like minecraft or the map or anything that stand always? Did u play one game for a whole day in the 8-10 hours and nothing happend? And sorry for asking too much but i will work to get that much money so im little scared and ty
@@luaie5896 I play mostly playstation games and they have fixed content, i play like 3 to four hours when im gaming.
I also wach youtube a lot and that has a fixed red youtube logo. Like i said after 2 years not a single problem.
@@SentientIronHeart tysm bro
@@luaie5896 No problem man good luck.
So for gamers, it's better to go for QLED? I am definitely worried I'd get burn in from video games if I get an OLED TV... but then again how is the HDR quality on QLED TVs?
I'm currently using a 1080p Sony Bravia lcd TV, which I was happy enough with tbh, but it's starting to get horizontal lines and it's sound is starting to lag behind video occasionally, so it's time to get a new TV.
I bought a LG C1 for my living room but it really struggled during the day when my balcony window provided a lot of indirect sunlight. Bought a Samsung QN90B for the living room and moved the C1 to my darker bedroom where it’s a perfect fit now. OLED for gaming, PC and cinema. QLED for general purpose viewing and bright environments.
THnaks for sharing , I am going to buy c1 for me living room too , but not sure about it too
@@starsbridge5115 my QLED had issues. Returned and got a C1.
@@FayyaazAhmed so to you think the brightness is enough ? Thanks for your time
I think EVERYONE knows OLED images are way better than QLED. The issue is how willing are you to risk image burn in on a TV with the kind of price tags associated with OLED Tvs. I mean it is not like ok I took a shot for 500 dollars
It would also give me Great Pause if you watch a lot of sports where things like box scores remain on the same local of the screen for hours on end which greatly increases the chance of burn in.
Just bought the Samsung Q90A , can’t wait to use it !
I'm sorry for your loss. (Your money) buying samsung products is like going to a near by trash can picking out some trash and paying for it
Overall I get the idea that current TV's are junk quality. The IQ is mostly theory. Build quality is the poorest of the poorest. The price is not on par with the size, so there have to be dozens of caveats. Not to mention the software, Tyzen or Android TV is total garbage. The broadcast is still mostly 1080p REC 709, and nothing beats a good 2010 FullHD CCFL LCD or Plasma on that content. Blacks are not total on an old Bravia, but 1:5000 is more than enough, with the least amount of ambient light you can't tell.
My 2017 Samsung 65 inch QLED still looks great. Has light bleed from the very sides, but the image and color still looks so good it's not even noticeable. I recently got an Aorus AO48U OLED monitor, and they both look great and have their own advantages. Makes it hard to upgrade, even with the light bleed on the QLED.
I have Samsungs 55 inch ks9500. its edge lit with slight bleed on the right bottom screen but its a FANTASTIC tv. I am curious If I should go with an lg oled 65 inch or Samsungs new 8k tvs that are now center lit
@@em1ownerify Dont go 8k, it aint worth it now.
@@spartacuscreator ya but the 8k Samsung is almost future proofing yourself. When I bought my ka9500 2017 Samsung 4K was not really offered as much through app providers. Now they are and so are my gaming systems
@@em1ownerify Yes, YOUR gaming systems. Most of the gaming systems aren't even close and you're talking about 8K already. You think in 5 years 8K will push through if 4K even isn't that regular, ESPECIALLY in gaming.
@@em1ownerify Nah it’s honestly a waste of money. You would be paying way extra for a feature that can’t be utilized properly yet, and by the time it can be, there will be better TVs in the market that cost half the money of the one you bought. Happened to me back in 2014 when 4K TVs had just hit the market. But at the end of the day, do what makes you happy.
other than the crypto BS, i liked the info provided.
I bought two Sony 55in OLED TVs just over two years ago. The backlit went out on both of them. The cost to repair them was ridiculous and it made more sense to buy a new TV. I bought the Samsung 55in Class QLED 4K UHD. The picture on the new Samsung TV looks a lot better than my previous Sony TVs. From my understanding QLED TV's last a lot longer than OLED.
Must have had those special oled's that are backlit.
@@thequiet1374 Lmao 😂
u made a mistake by not using an onn instead of a tcl lol
I bought an LG CX when they just released. and I've got some pretty bad burn in. I turned on all the anti-burn in features, and ran pixel refresher. I love the picture, but I think my next tv will be a Qled.
@@zoopa9988 As of right now, 14782 hours. Pixel refresh helps, and it's not super noticable, but I hate having to baby it at times. I really do love the picture and the response time for gaming. Well, I say it's not super noticable, that's after I ran the hour long pixel refresh every day for the last week. It WAS pretty bad, but now it's just noticible when it's on certain plain color backgrounds, and it's light enough I can ignore it. I'll probably run pixel refresh every day for the next week, and see if I can get it a bit better. I also turned the brightness down from 80 to 60. Also, to look up the hours you've used it, you go to All settings -> Support -> Total power on time
@@BlueThundah75 don't run the pixelrefresher to much, it makes only sense one time after 2000 hours, or if you have problems. It will not be better if you run it everyday.
The tv run a small refresh every 4 hours if you turn your tv into standby. So don't disconnect it from power.
@@BlueThundah75 How do you have 14782 hours? That's 616 days of 24 hour usage.
@@navid617 Yeah, sounds about right, I usually user the power saver option to turn off my screen so music and such still plays while the TV is off, It's hard for me to sleep if something isn't going on in the background, and I can't power off the tv and run the sound. so I'd say about half of that is the time my screen was actually on.
@@BlueThundah75 Lol that's crazy. I racked up 2400 hours in 9 months and I thought my usage was too heavy. I would really like to get at least 7 years out of my CX.
Anyone have any experience with the RCA 65" RWOSQU6526?
im not sure but rca isnt what they used to be ever since the late end of 2012 but u might wana look it up on yt to see what u think i reccomend onns new 2023 qled its got deep blacks for the price with better lg sony like qled brigness the onn is like an older rca picure ur prob thinking of and theres no burn in and im not sure about blooming prob not cuz its a good cheap budget brand that cares and most peaple dont know that its actually pretty premuim stuff they make better tvs than vizio now and theri blast on sound bar is a great deal too with suboofer sold seprate as an upgrade i wouldnt waste my money on some brand that has blooming isues not talking about rca but for that rca like picture u know and luv look up the new onn its better than tcl it has roku too and it doesnt spy on you like tcl vizio and i think rca does now too
QLED is great. But OLED is just superior for now.
Well, it depends. I dont agree with that one. I think oled has a better image quality but that doesn't make it superior. Qled is perfect for gaming and the sun never distorts your image. And besides that, things like no burn in makes it possible to have Ambient mode 24/7 on if u would like to. And the premium qled tv's have superior speakers compared to oled thin screens Where's there no room for that.
So at the end it really depends on your situation and your needs, none of them is superior
Says who?
Nah burn in, is a huge draw back
@@User05199 OLED is better for gaming with response time of 1ms,color accuracy,contrast and viewing angle.
@edzkar73 Well, I would say oled is better for movies. For gaming qled just wins. Have fun worrying about burn ins while playing a game for a long time with static content like an ammo counter etc
I pre-ordered the Samsung 55" Class S95B OLED 4K Smart TV (2022) directly from Samsung. Samsung hasn't released these television to Best Buy and other retailers. Worst comparison of a TCL and Hisense OLED televisions, and they're no where near comparing to a Samsung. I currently own a Samsung 2018 49 inch NU8000 Premium 4K UHD and a 2020 Samsung 32 inch 4K QLED televisions. The picture quality on both my Samsung televisions are fantastic. Let's face it, Samsung produce some of the best televisions along with Sony and LG.
My last 3 tv's were OLED, my new Samsung 8K neo Qled beats them into the ground. I love it more than I can say. I probably wouldn't buy another OLED at any rate, the last one got a big green blotch in the center in under 2 years, turns out that's a pretty common occurrence, the tv overheats the OLED cells in the center and blotches the tv, but NOBODY tells you about that when you're looking to buy.
So Q leads the way?
@@youlittlerocket That's my opinion. I know a lot of diehard OLED fans would disagree. Here's the thing for me, yes OLED can get slightly better blacks, but QLED can get WAAAYYY better color range overall and so far, no green blotches
@@traviswanamaker988Have they improved LCD black levels so much that it's only a little worse than OLED? OLED has literally infinitely better black levels than my monitor. Maybe they use a VA screen, which has other problems. Or they use local dimming, but don't you see some blooming around bright images that don't perfectly align with the LEDs?
@@NaudVanDalen not on an 8k qned, it doesnt bloom at all. my old lcd tv's yes, blooming was awful. qn900a is tv perfection tho
@@traviswanamaker988 Surely it blooms, but you can't see it because it has a lot of LEDs as backlighting. It's not like it has 33 million LEDs though, so there must be a little bit of blooming. Maybe the static contrast is good enough so you don't really see a lot of difference or it has so many LEDs (tens of thousands) that the area that gets lit up is only a few square millimeters.
It does beat buying a new OLED TV every 5 years though. And constantly worrying about burn in. Both my phones have burned in after a few years. OLED TVs should last at least 10 years for the money they cost if my $300 LCD monitor is still working perfectly fine after 8 years. Imagine buying a $1000 OLED monitor every 3 years because of the heavy burn in because of the Windows start bar. At least TVs won't burn in that fast.
I have to say that this comparison is far from fair. If you want to compare Sonys High end Oled to a QLED TV, Just Pick a high end QLED TV. The tcl 5 series is a Budget qled TV that is Not comparable to Something Like qn90a (US)/QN95A (EU).
He wasn’t comparing the A90J to the TCL specifically, he was comparing OLED to QLED in general. He just had the TCL there as an example.
Pretty happy with my OLED LG. LG even has an extensive free programming choices powered by Pluto TV and Crackle. Of course, my old TV was a 2008 720p Sony Bravia, so when I got the LG OLED working it was stunning in its clarity. Fortunately, I have relatively high internet speed. Kind of a requirement to pick up NFL and ESPN games live and get high quality video.
That’s sad, as I live on a village and don’t have optical fiber, to speed up the connection. The quality of movies from vod platforms literally sucks🥲
Dude I did the same thing. Upgraded from a 2000’s Sony Bravia to a brand new 55’ LG C2 Evo! Looks great and I’m happy I made the switch
How’s the burn in?
@@jackbaggaley8836 I haven't seen any. The TV goes to black pretty quick, like in 10-15 seconds of idle pausing or stopped video. Also has a pixel "cleaner" phase that resets any burn in.
Wait till Micro-LED tech fully takes off (Samsung leading the charge as usual). It will kill OLED. Same deep blacks with no risk of burn-in and LED brightness/colors. Or even NANO-LED tech. Even better than micro-LED but probably a decade or so off from being in homes. Micro-LED probably mainstream in roughly 5 years if Samsung heavily pushes it as it is superior to OLED in literally almost every way. And once nano-led comes around, we go into a new era of tv quality we have never seen.
Stop peddeling NFT's and crypto its ruining the enviroment.
I actually think the discontinued Panasonic plasmas look as good as current OLED and QLED tv's.
You are not wrong mate ! i have them both , a Pana GT 60 from 2013 , and a c1 from 2021 and i can confirm that! i could never justify the upgrade just for the 4K alone. If there was any reason i wanted to, it had to be HDR ! But does the latest make big enough difference to go and spend couple grand on a new set? I don't think so. Unless you like to go up in screen size , just like i did. I am sure a 1080p resolution on a 60" plus sized screen wouldn't be sharp enough! The picture quality is identical! The C1 is a bit brighter, the Panasonic plasma keeps 1080 p motion resolution even on 60 hz content, where the LG can only do that in 120 Hz mode, but that high frame rate is achieved by adding black frames between two regular frame which will dim the picture and kill HDR , and at end , leave you with the same picture what the plasma has, the best SDR ever!
Brilliant. Really helpful, really well presented and a perfect summary. Thank you !
wow! another oled/qled no sense comparison...
Got a "budget" 65" QLED Hisense tv on Black Friday for 700. Considering I have a bright living room and wanted to spend less than 1k I honestly can't complain.
@@laloajuria4678 everyone keeps spending alot of money of 50/42" oleds when in reality it's small and not that bright for a living room. This tv fills up the room with bright bold colours and yes the blacks could be better and that hue of light in the corners does annoy me sometimes but the quality of the picture is stunning none the less
I own a U8G and a B7 OLED, and honestly, OLED is far better in every aspect apart from the brightness which can be used properly due to the greying out of the PIC, but the U8G is still good!!
was it a u7g or u6g?
Let them fight it out, I still have my Zenith System 3
The mini-led QLEDs are a pretty great compromise. i have a TCL series 6 that’s only a small step down in quality from my buddy’s OLED for about half the price. I also had a TCL Series 5 QLED (no mini led) and it was a big step down in quality - not worth the savings imo