We just went through this same research and decision. For our family room we went with the Samsung 65" Q80R, not the LG OLED we were also seriously considering (we have been buying LG TVs for 25 years too). This review unfortunately really only showed the biggest drawback with QLED. It didn't talk about the fact that QLED is much brighter for example and this is critical if the room has a large window you don't want to block. When we installed the same priced ($1500) LG OLED in our family room it wasn't bright enough to be viewed without closing the large screen door's vertical blinds. The Samsung QLED on the other hand produces fantastic image quality in the very bright room and didn't even need to use the brightest settings. Also the color reproduction and detail was slightly better on QLED out of the box (although likely with a bit of tuning probably not an issue on the OLED). The issue demonstrated in the review only looks like this on our Q80R with local dimming set to high, which is also the case if dynamic viewing mode or demo mode is enabled. Using "standard" mode this issue goes away and results in reasonably bright stars. The background isn't 100% pitch black but it is still very black. Our Q80R actually came from the factory in "standard" viewing mode where the local dimming is set to low by default. "Dynamic" mode does look good with its extreme brightness combined with pitch black blacks but we prefer to use "standard" mode and be able to see stars in sci-fi movies like Star Wars. Burn in on OLED is a real problem, especially if used at the highest brightness levels. All of the store demo OLED TVs show burn in with them, even after less than 1 month of use (if you look closely). QLED on the other hand doesn't suffer from burn in at all and all of the QLED demo units still produced fantastic images after more than 6 months of 12 hour days of use. Ultimately our decision was the following: 1. For a dedicated home theater with no windows (or at least minimal stray light) and where you only use the tv for watching moving images like movies, I would go with a fairly high end OLED. The superior dark performance makes it worth it. 2. For our family room where there is a lot of bright stray light entering the room much of the time and the tv is often left on with a movie paused or with a selection menu on the screen for many hours brightness and durability is essential. For this the QLED is really the only practical option with its incredible brightness and rock solid durability. After using it almost constantly for about 3 monthse are extremely happy with our choice.
You don't have to justify your bad purchase, because QLED will never show you true colours like black. OLED would have been the better purchase, but you messed up!
@@gavin9715 I feel like OLED for bedroom and like R8000 for the living room is actually a good choice. For me, the living room is all about screen-size anyway.
+Slider68 Dude, you should have just gone with the OLED, and LG has put in measures to prevent the burn-in, didn't you see the video? By the way, why would Samsung name their tv Q"LED" when it's not even LED, because they know that LED is more superior and it's what most people are looking for these days. You just made a bad purchase and now you're trying to write this huge comment to prove to yourself and pretend that you made a good purchase. And most standard living rooms will be able to handle the OLED tv, even with a big window, you will get a glare on the LCD TVs as well, it's not like LCD is glare proof, both technologies are made of glass, which will get glare.
They might. Because he did not color-calibrate the TVs to match their brightness, saturation and contrast identically. What a scam video this is. He literally says "both TVs are on their standard color settings" . Anyone who reviews technology and home cinema equipment knows that this is such a bullshit way to compare anything, since all technology comes with wildly different color presets. Some go for "pop" and others go for realism. An honest video would use a colorimeter and balance the TVs and THEN see if there is any inherent difference, which is what EVERY serious home theater "videophile" magazine does. What he did instead was just lazily and incorrectly compare the default presets of the TVs, which is worthless information. It is as if I took TWO IDENTICAL LG TVs and set one to 100% SATURATION and asked you "which one is more Saturated? Pick the winner!"... It is just a completely worthless comparison unless you calibrate both screens identically. Sigh. I am a big fan of Jerry but this video sucks ass. If you actually calibrated both screens, I would bet you that the starfield would get a black background on the QLED too. Furthermore, the starfield is THE most dishonest way to compare the screens, because a starfield is a black area dotted with bright pure-white pixels, which means the backlight has to turn on for the entire screen, and that is not a realistic scenario. In most movies, black is pitch black and is not dotted with stars, and you would not see any difference in light levels since the entire backlight would be turned off for both TVs. Anyway, for what it is worth, he is also totally wrong about QLED and how it works. Samsung created QLED because they did not want to get into OLED manufacturing since there are massive issues with burn-in for that technology. So they created self-dimming pixels. There is a filter on the screen which can totally dim individual pixels. The Q Stands for Quantum Dot Display, which is that grid. They use region-lighting LEDs in the back, and that filter in the front to block out the remaining light. As a result, they get extremely close to OLED black levels, while having a screen that is amazingly OVER 30 TIMES BRIGHTER (meaning the QLED TV is actually viewable in direct sunlight). And the QLED screen is guaranteed to far outlive any OLED which will burn out and dim after a few years as proven by the RTINGS testing institute in their years-long OLED testing. I would purchase a QLED for all of these reasons. But the core issue of this video remains: Neither screen is calibrated so there is no comparison at all. Just two wildly different default presets. Which is worthless information. This video is literally, in the literal sense, useless... And yes I get mad when useless information gets passed off as facts. In a video sponsored by one of the TVs. Which just happened to win. It is irresponsible, slanted and dishonest. I thought Jerry was better than this. Maybe he is just not knowledgeable about TVs? The video certainly gives that impression. In that case I can forgive him. But I also think he has a responsibility to educate himself when doing sponsored advertisements to a big audience like this.
One of the key differences between QLED and OLED is price point. Dollar for dollar, QLED gives you an outstanding viewing experience that I personally feel punches above its weight class. There's no doubt imo that OLED is the superior picture, but QLED closes the gap enough at a cost-effective range to give less affluent consumers a genuinely stunning 4K experie ce.
@@Alpha-C Sadly they don't make plasma's anymore ? My wife threw my cell phone at the couch next to our 13 yr old 58 in Samsung plasma...she missed the couch, she killed our plasma that still had a great picture
@@megalodonseancasey8429 it have all plasma benefit with low power consumption, lower heat and higher price compare with plasma. Oled is the better option compare with qled,but there is risk screen burn in just like plasma too. Budget and location room still take bigger part here tho. Depending in which room this tv gonna use; In bright (many sunlight) room go qled. In controlled room (with windows closer) medium lit room go oled. This 2 condition is important to have tv that easy on eyes. From my experience, Brightness on tv have direct impact with eye strain, hence my opinion.
After tons of research let me just save you some time - QLED - longer life, brighter display OLED - shorter life, risk of burn in but has better display with better contrast, brightness doesn't always mean better but a good contrast and better color ratio could make the images pop out more.
@@abdulgafar7529 LG nanocells use IPS technology which can give you a great viewing angles but blueish Blacks (even with local dimming) while Samsung qled uses VA panels that can produce deep blacks but not so great viewing angles which is great for a small room or home cinema I think Samsung's Q80t has got a special coating that can improve the viewing angles. Still I'd go with the Sony X900H or Hisense H9G
Why I like your channel: 1. Straight into what I'm actually here for. 2. Great speaking voice. Enunciation is spot on. 3. Speaks about all the tech without making me feel completely stupid. 4. Straight into what I'm actually here for. (Yes, I said this twice.)
@@Jaybird98 Enunciation is the act of pronouncing words. ... Enunciation is from the Latin word enuntiationem, meaning “declaration.” Enunciation is more than pronouncing words clearly; it's expressing them well, too. Please check the definition of Annunciation. I was clear when I meant he speaks well. He was not announcing the Incarnation. Good day to you, sir.
QLED is an inferior panel, with poorer local dimming, and terrible HDR reproduction. Samsung’s QLED TVs are a terrible choice for 4K HDR movies and gaming.
Your voice is so incredible, in general, but also specifically for narration. The fact that your narration voice is so close to your regular speaking voice is really wild to me-like imagining you ordering food with adjustments in that voice tickles me so much. I love it, thanks for the amazing videos!
He’s right though ! Really tech savey people will change TVs every 1-4 years normal people 8- 10 years , the only thing that can change that are strangely enough large sporting events ( World Cup/super bowl) or large leaps in tech ie when HD/3D first came out
Once you go OLED, you can't go back. MicroLED is the only thing that will get me to switch but that's still in development. All the benefits of OLED, but no burn in!
This video of the star field is the first I've ever seen, and wow does it so clearly point out the technological differences between two competing technologies, thank you for this!
Both seems great, but picture on the QLED looks a bit more natural than on OLED display. Taking price into consideration and I would probably go for QLED, especially because it has higher brightness, which is good when watching TV in daylight.
@Stewer1000 I got a c1 55 for £940 but return it cuz samsung s95b qled are brighter. back in 2017 they was £1.6k. U can get a c1 if they are still about 65 inches for £1.1k
It depends on the dimming settings (the dimming system is much more advanced in the TVs, and the demo video exploits it) This video is just demonstrating an extreme example of when OLED is better LCD TVs can be much better in other scenarios like max brightness Both TVs are great (I own a LG C9 OLED)
LG all the way baby! Bought my parents a 49 inch TV from them with OLED display after saving up for a year and its display is phenomenal for its price! Plus, the magic remote is definitely a selling point!
I've watched the entire saga of Star Wars on my qled by Hisense ,never complained once about the lack of stars on a qled type panel nor have I ever bitched about the contrast
@@dantasticmania8728 well if you don't know what you're missing out on of course you would think its fine. I'm sure if you switched you would tell the difference. It's like console players going from 60hz refresh rate to pc 120hz, they say console is fine the way it is, but after experiencing 120hz they realise what they were missing out on
@@DimzReacts Missing a few stars while still having a damn decent picture at an affordable price I'll take it. Second oleds aren't without picture flaws as well and can produce black crush or even lifted black in some instances. The whole 2.1 thing really doesn't matter to me since I mostly play single player games on consoles and from what I've heard not too many single player games are even going to be running at 120fps to begin with.Sorry but I don't mind missing out on a bunch of screaming foul mouthed 12-16 yr olds on the mic in broken game lobbies.
@@dantasticmania8728 yeah that's cool, my gaming laptop is 60hz and I get by just fine. But I reckon if I went to 120hz I would definitely see a difference. Each to their own I guess
@@dantasticmania8728 Dude it's not just colors and brightness, HDR is better, it displays millions more colors and more accurately. It has less latency, doesn't get as hot, and doesn't have terrible viewing angles. OLED isolate don't cost much more, no idea where you're getting the idea that OLED is more expansive. LCD is just so old it's dirt cheap. You'd save even more money if you bought a CRT TV. Not to mention AMOLED displays coming to TVs and monitors which is even better than OLED.
Those super-high contrast/bright color videos right next to a outdoor scene can be deceiving. I am glad you did a side by side comparison of the same picture. It tells quite a tale. I trust you after watching you on YT for years now. Thank you for this review. I had some questions you thoroughly answered.
@@noisenoise9600 Yes I know. I wasn't referring to the video in my comment but to the person that I was replying to. In response to his/her response to the original comment.
@@theemperor1379 OLEDs are for people like me who don't use it a lot and use it primarily for movies, Tv shows, and videogames, and not as in regular TV and pc monitor.
I worked for Japanese manufacturers selling pro-grade high end HDR monitors for the film, TV and video game markets. There was a very popular OLED HDR monitor for colour grading films that was quite beautiful looking with 1000 nits of brightness and full HDR10 and Dolby Vision rating. I was selling a competitive LCD model that was 1200 nits. The OLED models were initially popular because the image was very striking. The black levels were undeniably great so the contrast looked amazing. The LCD models were better at colour accuracy but less impressive with black levels. The tie breaker actually came with time. The OLED monitors had a hard time with colour accuracy as previously mentioned but the black levels started to drift over time also. Consistency is key when colour grading and colour grading a project on OLED turned out to be troublesome. They would work on a project, take it to a screening room with a projector and it would look completely different. Simply put. OLED ages as it is an organic material. If you like to keep your TVs for a decently long time, go LCD. Like Zack said, LED is just the lighting, it’s still an LCD TV.
A month later I want to add that my 2 Samsung 58” LCD TVs both have burned out lines within 2 years of owning them. I own a Panasonic plasma that is over 10 years old, has no burn in, no lines burned out and looks great.
A CCFL LCD TV would not have these issues as well. Those are super reliable on the long term. They only do FullHD, but that is ok for me. My genre of movies, arthouse, is never in 4K on BluRay/streaming. Black levels are amazing too, I've never seen as even backlit screens as old CCFL ones. Black is a very nice ultra dark gray from corner to corner, yet the coating is of a nice semi-matte anti glare quality no TV has today, so the blacks apear very solid even in bright lit rooms.
@@suhaibaijaz4835 are you on crack? OLED virtually has an INFINITE contrast...In terms of color GAMUT, QLED may have the upper end, but that's only because the OLED is probably 8bit instead of 10bit. Also, since the QLED has backlights, it can get brighter and produce better dynamic range. Either way man, you gotta look at them in a store to really understand the difference.
@@LarsonChristopher ita a pitty that there is such a big price difference between LG-sony because sony has the better chip for viewing those lower resolution files dvd and lower At least that what i hear Have to bring a usn stick to the store with files to check how the LG handles that Also a pitty that LG dropped the zoom funktion in 9 series seemed a good way to zoom in 10% to get logos out of frame
Being an owner of both an LG OLED and the Samsung Q90r QLED series, i have to say i prefer the Q90r. I live in miami and if you need to watch tv in the day time with an OLED and cant close the curtains, you might as well not watch it at all. The glare of an OLED TV is almost like a mirror in certain scenarios. Though OLED has its perks (deeper blacks and colors), i can watch a dark movie in daylight and still be able to differentiate within the scene due to the higher peak brightness. Its all a matter of preference right now not which is better, your eyes cant differentiate between microscopic pixels and personally if you rewatch the waterfall segment it looks much better and detailed in the QLED TV.
@@CrazedBuffoon I am thinking the same thing when buying. About 7 or 8 years ago I bought a plasma for its superior image quality and p/p on purchase. But it has a glossy screen and it burns in if i play GTA for too long and there is the map constantly. It fades away eventually, but still. Its picture is, however, ridiculously good. But for the most part, I just regret not buying an LCD back then... Simply for convenience. In my student apartment I have a 32" LCD tv. The picture quality is nothing to write home about, but it is good enough and i never think while watching a movie that the picture should be better.... I do however appreciate all the time that i can watch in any room at any time of the day.
@@TheMydem0 nah it´s not cheaper. A qled q90 and a LG cx is about the same price, you must be actually be braindead to buy a qled at that price. Q80 is about where it ends to make sense, q80 in my opinion a great value but prices above oled is far better.
I have two old Panasonic 55 inch OLED TVs. To prevent burn in; First 100 hours of use, no gaming/no TV logos. I played full screen movies / DVD videos with no logos. Second, 100 to 1000 hours, no more than 2 hours of gaming/TV logos per day. Checked for image retention each day & watched hours of full screen video (no logos) each day. Third, after 1000 hours with no burn in, the TV could play games/TV logos normally but I’d still play movies/TV (no logos) to balance things out. ** I would do the same routine w/ a new LG OLED TV.
bb1111116 Well, I think I want a new TV to use however I pleased for many years to come, so unless OLED have this weakness resolved I wouldn’t want to buy one just yet.
SToXC_; what I’ve read about the built in anti-burn in is that it is an easy way to do what I did manually. I would use anti-burn in regularly if I got a new OLED TV.
Frank Wang; I understand. I am just hooked on those perfect blacks & the space images with clear stars as shown in Jerry’s video. I’m willing to put up with babying the TV in the first 1000 hours of use to get that great picture.
Quite a few comments, I'm sure it was mentioned, that for outdoors or highly lit areas, IPS/LCD panels can be much brighter. Also if HDR is your thing, LCD aka QLED can hit higher HDR and Dolby Vision levels than OLED. I'm waiting however for QD-OLED, that will be the ultimate.
Yeah he didnt even mention the brightness in the whole video, which is a very big deal tbh. The intense brightness QLED has definitely over the cheaper OLED TV's is insane. Like 800 nits VS 1600 nits easily. My friend bought a 2200 dollar OLED TV but my dad's 500 dollar QLED TV blew me away compared to the 2200 dollar one. The brightness is so amazing.
@@blazesmooth5573 lol 11 momths old post. But nah most people watch TV with blinds open for sure. But even when u close them u need ur tv to pop to give a nice image. I never said oled isn't better but qled is way cheaper and definitely good
I've had the LG OLED for almost 2 years now and hands down its the best TV I've ever had. Granted, I upgraded from a much older 1080p LCD. The burn in issue is real so be cautious. I was heavily using the display for about 3-4 months where the windows taskbar was present. Red colors from the chrome logo, and the windows store logo are burned into the bottom now. Its almost never an issue unless you are watching 16:9 content with solid bright colors. I just ended up hiding the taskbar and getting used to that. Overall, I'd say even with the risk of burn in, this TV has been the best entertainment experience I've ever had and well worth the money!
@@anthonygreen440 I’m about to buy the new Sony A90J my first OLED and the only reason I’d buy at BB is the burn in warranty. I’m glad you said it’s still worth the risk! I’m like F it try something new lol
@Warm Soft Kitty You are utterly insane to think that LG wouldn't spend $3000 to get 1.9 million views. That's practically free advertising for them. A 30-second cable television commercial costs well over $650k.
I’d like to hear you say this quote: “No lieutenant your men are already dead.” Agent Smith - The Matrix 1999. Smooth and clear voice you have. In all seriousness thank you for explaining the difference between these two TVs.
@@obi-wankenobi8406 as long as hes not watching this video on a full array backlight monitor, hes gonna see the diffrence. the whole problem with the stars is the full array backlight.
I have an Oled and a Qled. Whenever I'm watching movies about stars I prefer the Oled hands down. But when I'm watching content especially outdoor nature documentaries in daylight I prefer the Qled. As can be seen in the mountain scene at 6:27 the Oled is blue, but the Qled has more realistic earth tones. Also in the upper right of the screen the Oled clipped off the top of the mountain with overblown whites.
Not like I'm two years late to the party but the OLED did not clip any of the highlights. It's just Zach's camera that doesn't have quite the dynamic range to capture the OLED's image. Also, one doesn't have "more realistic earth tones," as was said in the video, both TVs are running with the default out of the box setting. If you pay an extra couple of 10s of dollars at the store, they'll calibrate the colors for you.
It's hard to believe that a video was playing on the QLED at all in that stars/dark scene. If it was, then the OLED looked much better obviously, but then after, when you showed the landscape videos of the trees, the QLED picture looked much better.
@@apoorvappychoudhary392 The TVs were out of the box and not calibrated. He really should have calibrated both displays to do a test like this. The same panel from the same model can vary from screen to screen, let alone two different technologies from two different manufacturers. LG might prefer a certain color temperature/settings for their sets and Samsung another. If they were calibrated, they would be much easier to compare unbiased.
0:35 "LG sent me two TVs to compare [one of theirs and one from their main competitor]" Gee, I wonder which one is going to win. Sure would be awkward if LG lost in their own sponsored video!
I personally preferred the colours on the QLED TV. I felt they were too saturated on the OLED, which is weird seeing I prefer OLED screens over LCD screens on phones
@@franklingoodwin As @JerryRigEverything mentioned, both TVs were set to default profiles out of box. LG has really good color management settings on their TVs, you can adjust the picture to whatever color profiles that suits you best. One thing the QLED can't do, is exactly what @JerryRigEverything demonstrated, the concept of "infinite contrast". I'd rather grab the OLED to get a feature the QLED can't match, then adjust the OLED to my color preference liking.
😉 Truth in advertising. His review and assessment isn't wrong, hands down, OLED is better in just about every level of comparison tests, but you'll be hard pressed to spot the differences. We're fast approaching the law of diminishing returns. They're all looking great, even the cheap TV's. So 8K is the next up sell, from there, 🤷🏽♂️
@@franklingoodwin On a phone, because of its screen size, all looks great, but blow that up to 55" or more and you'll notice those color washouts. I preferred the QLED colors as well.
@@ishid_anfarded_king Lagner "ruining their pay" man do you even think they deserve the lifestyles they get by just making the kind of TH-cam videos they do, really.... This channel is a good channel but it does not mean they should be earning soo much but they do and they still will, not really a great contribution at all to society but hey they help you decide what is worth buying, right... Or you could use your own brain and research and even check in stores yourself to know what you would like.. But hey, let's worry about that guys pockets shall we.. Pathetic
@@Dz-em2wl Oh yea because all electronic stores have someone knowledgeable all the time in there working and assisting you, Most times I ask people they just talk out there ass. Let people learn how they want and assist others with their insight & let the world learn. Parents should have taught you the following "If you have nothing good to say then don't say anything at all".
This is LG sponsoring ...I have a Sony X950G LED and it shows stars perfectly with minimal blooming. I would only recommend OLED if you only watch movies in a dark room as OLED tend to look dim in light filled room.
@@andreasstamatakis4983 that's what i thought. the other videos comparison the samsung look better. My living room is attached to a sunroom so brightness is important to me. i have the ks8000 and i will admit it's not made for HDR contents to be watch during the day, but at night it's ok. The ks8000 look better during the day than any other oled tv i owned at that time. I don't even watch a lot of hdr contents so i saved my money by returning the oled tv.
Thank you for making this video, it has helped me make a decision for a new TV. I've had mine for about 7 years, and it's finally starting to have issues that I can't ignore anymore... it randomly disconnects itself from the internet, sometimes won't turn on until unplugged and plugged back in. Time for an upgrade!!
@@ede8193 I went to c8 oled from a 8 years old plasma (which was great at the time). After 8 months I still cannot believe seeing floating images in completely black surroundings when a movie begins. Only who has an oled knows what I mean...
QLED is a marketing move from Samsung, QLED and OLED sound similar (thats what the marketing move was for) but have NOTHING in common. Many people, including my brother, thought/think that QLED is as good as OLED because the names are nearly the same. He went out and bought a QLED. QLEDs are REGULAR LCD Panels with the only difference that they are „powered“ by „Quantum Dot“ Leds. QLED TVs come in with the same positive and negative aspects as LCD/LED TVs. I hope one day that all ppl will get this.
@@elhugeo I played this video on my Samsung Q50, and I have no idea why they keep this lie in every comparison - I can see everything in this starfield video. QLED is more than good enough.
@@chriss.8291 Oh please, the dude literally said he was just done reviewing two phones and when given a blind camera comparison, he couldn't tell half the time which one was which, and said "the pixel took this pic" based on what looked better. He's a sham now. Used to be a fan in 2013, too.
Home Theatre Engineering no it would not, OLED cannot produce the same level of filtered light QLED can, you always left with a cool blue picture. And more so as it ages.
6:14 as 'realistic' (as in, true-to-vision) the QLED may be, I think I prefer OLED. How do I explain this? When juxtaposing the QLED to the OLED, one feels like the image result of really good eye vision, while the other looks like the result of a really good camera, photoshop and all.
i'm trying to look for a new tv, and thanks to your video ( a very clear understandable resources) it's making my decision a lot easier. Keep up the the good work.
Can`t wait micro led tv...right now I use one year old samsung Qled and it is stunning for gaming and movies. Never want to deal burn in issues with Oled tv-s until they give at least warranty more than 7 years.
I have a LG C8 55* and is extremely happy with both the interface and the fantastic picture quality. I don't fear to much for burn ins as the screen saver in it self is a burnfixer.
Here’s why I’m getting a led... I want an 82” or 85” tv. Sony, Samsung, and LG sell led tv’s that size for $3500 or less. Oled tv’s are much more expensive, especially when you are looking for something over 75”.
100% correct.... same reason for me as well.... OLED is interesting but the picture is not much better. Honestly in the side by side comparisons the waterfall has much more detail on the QLED.
@@gakuto7728 nope Qled Outperform OLED big time in a bright room talking from experience!.. got an OLED and I can barely see the screen doing daytime couse my living room is very bright.. so Personally DO I NOT recommend Oled if you're gonna place it in bright room! But no dout a better Picture if you're in dark room or at later hour's.. also The OLED at least In Denmark start at a price that's like atleast 300-500$ more than the rest of the tv's... All that been said I do love my TV images after the day hours 😍😍
Great Video presentation, After 10 years my current TV has chosen to end its life so I am beginning my research on the newer tech that is out there... I found your video very informative. Thanks
Jerry: *beaks his arm*
Doctor pointing at the X-ray screen: Here you can see scratches at a level six with a deeper grooves at the level seven...
Lol
Hahaha
“But my A/V defines me! Even makes my purple warrior bigger without a prescription!”
“Pretty normal for bones”
LOL
We just went through this same research and decision. For our family room we went with the Samsung 65" Q80R, not the LG OLED we were also seriously considering (we have been buying LG TVs for 25 years too).
This review unfortunately really only showed the biggest drawback with QLED. It didn't talk about the fact that QLED is much brighter for example and this is critical if the room has a large window you don't want to block. When we installed the same priced ($1500) LG OLED in our family room it wasn't bright enough to be viewed without closing the large screen door's vertical blinds. The Samsung QLED on the other hand produces fantastic image quality in the very bright room and didn't even need to use the brightest settings. Also the color reproduction and detail was slightly better on QLED out of the box (although likely with a bit of tuning probably not an issue on the OLED). The issue demonstrated in the review only looks like this on our Q80R with local dimming set to high, which is also the case if dynamic viewing mode or demo mode is enabled. Using "standard" mode this issue goes away and results in reasonably bright stars. The background isn't 100% pitch black but it is still very black. Our Q80R actually came from the factory in "standard" viewing mode where the local dimming is set to low by default. "Dynamic" mode does look good with its extreme brightness combined with pitch black blacks but we prefer to use "standard" mode and be able to see stars in sci-fi movies like Star Wars.
Burn in on OLED is a real problem, especially if used at the highest brightness levels. All of the store demo OLED TVs show burn in with them, even after less than 1 month of use (if you look closely). QLED on the other hand doesn't suffer from burn in at all and all of the QLED demo units still produced fantastic images after more than 6 months of 12 hour days of use.
Ultimately our decision was the following:
1. For a dedicated home theater with no windows (or at least minimal stray light) and where you only use the tv for watching moving images like movies, I would go with a fairly high end OLED. The superior dark performance makes it worth it.
2. For our family room where there is a lot of bright stray light entering the room much of the time and the tv is often left on with a movie paused or with a selection menu on the screen for many hours brightness and durability is essential. For this the QLED is really the only practical option with its incredible brightness and rock solid durability. After using it almost constantly for about 3 monthse are extremely happy with our choice.
You don't have to justify your bad purchase, because QLED will never show you true colours like black.
OLED would have been the better purchase, but you messed up!
@@gavin9715 I feel like OLED for bedroom and like R8000 for the living room is actually a good choice. For me, the living room is all about screen-size anyway.
+Slider68
Dude, you should have just gone with the OLED, and LG has put in measures to prevent the burn-in, didn't you see the video?
By the way, why would Samsung name their tv Q"LED" when it's not even LED,
because they know that LED is more superior and it's what most people are looking for these days.
You just made a bad purchase and now you're trying to write this huge comment to prove to yourself and pretend that you made a good purchase.
And most standard living rooms will be able to handle the OLED tv,
even with a big window, you will get a glare on the LCD TVs as well, it's not like LCD is glare proof,
both technologies are made of glass, which will get glare.
I always though oled would outperform most LCDs in terms of brightness
This Comment Is Brought To You By Samsung. We Hope You Enjoy!
Jerry, now Samsung is going to break your other wrist, before Christmas.
Then he'll pay a visit to their office with his tear down kit and a rope
@@prateekpanwar646 I'm dead both of yall funny asf
I would love to see a samsung v zack fight
@@ybdbeats That's good some new jokes in market are arriving
They might. Because he did not color-calibrate the TVs to match their brightness, saturation and contrast identically. What a scam video this is. He literally says "both TVs are on their standard color settings" . Anyone who reviews technology and home cinema equipment knows that this is such a bullshit way to compare anything, since all technology comes with wildly different color presets. Some go for "pop" and others go for realism. An honest video would use a colorimeter and balance the TVs and THEN see if there is any inherent difference, which is what EVERY serious home theater "videophile" magazine does. What he did instead was just lazily and incorrectly compare the default presets of the TVs, which is worthless information. It is as if I took TWO IDENTICAL LG TVs and set one to 100% SATURATION and asked you "which one is more Saturated? Pick the winner!"... It is just a completely worthless comparison unless you calibrate both screens identically. Sigh. I am a big fan of Jerry but this video sucks ass. If you actually calibrated both screens, I would bet you that the starfield would get a black background on the QLED too. Furthermore, the starfield is THE most dishonest way to compare the screens, because a starfield is a black area dotted with bright pure-white pixels, which means the backlight has to turn on for the entire screen, and that is not a realistic scenario. In most movies, black is pitch black and is not dotted with stars, and you would not see any difference in light levels since the entire backlight would be turned off for both TVs. Anyway, for what it is worth, he is also totally wrong about QLED and how it works. Samsung created QLED because they did not want to get into OLED manufacturing since there are massive issues with burn-in for that technology. So they created self-dimming pixels. There is a filter on the screen which can totally dim individual pixels. The Q Stands for Quantum Dot Display, which is that grid. They use region-lighting LEDs in the back, and that filter in the front to block out the remaining light. As a result, they get extremely close to OLED black levels, while having a screen that is amazingly OVER 30 TIMES BRIGHTER (meaning the QLED TV is actually viewable in direct sunlight). And the QLED screen is guaranteed to far outlive any OLED which will burn out and dim after a few years as proven by the RTINGS testing institute in their years-long OLED testing. I would purchase a QLED for all of these reasons. But the core issue of this video remains: Neither screen is calibrated so there is no comparison at all. Just two wildly different default presets. Which is worthless information. This video is literally, in the literal sense, useless... And yes I get mad when useless information gets passed off as facts. In a video sponsored by one of the TVs. Which just happened to win. It is irresponsible, slanted and dishonest. I thought Jerry was better than this. Maybe he is just not knowledgeable about TVs? The video certainly gives that impression. In that case I can forgive him. But I also think he has a responsibility to educate himself when doing sponsored advertisements to a big audience like this.
One of the key differences between QLED and OLED is price point. Dollar for dollar, QLED gives you an outstanding viewing experience that I personally feel punches above its weight class. There's no doubt imo that OLED is the superior picture, but QLED closes the gap enough at a cost-effective range to give less affluent consumers a genuinely stunning 4K experie ce.
Try plasma
@@Alpha-C Sadly they don't make plasma's anymore ? My wife threw my cell phone at the couch next to our 13 yr old 58 in Samsung plasma...she missed the couch, she killed our plasma that still had a great picture
Is the OLED harder on the eyes while watching a 2 hr movie ?
@@megalodonseancasey8429 it have all plasma benefit with low power consumption, lower heat and higher price compare with plasma.
Oled is the better option compare with qled,but there is risk screen burn in just like plasma too.
Budget and location room still take bigger part here tho.
Depending in which room this tv gonna use;
In bright (many sunlight) room go qled.
In controlled room (with windows closer) medium lit room go oled.
This 2 condition is important to have tv that easy on eyes.
From my experience,
Brightness on tv have direct impact with eye strain, hence my opinion.
@@megalodonseancasey8429 not in my experience, had my LGCX for about a year and half
After tons of research let me just save you some time -
QLED - longer life, brighter display
OLED - shorter life, risk of burn in but has better display with better contrast, brightness doesn't always mean better but a good contrast and better color ratio could make the images pop out more.
What about LG’s Nanocell TVs?
@@abdulgafar7529 it is lcd like qled
@@yukikora5148 yes but they have different panels. Samsung uses VA panels and LG uses the other one. Forgot what it’s called.
@@yukikora5148 which brand would you prefer?
@@abdulgafar7529 LG nanocells use IPS technology which can give you a great viewing angles but blueish Blacks (even with local dimming) while Samsung qled uses VA panels that can produce deep blacks but not so great viewing angles which is great for a small room or home cinema I think Samsung's Q80t has got a special coating that can improve the viewing angles. Still I'd go with the Sony X900H or Hisense H9G
Why I like your channel:
1. Straight into what I'm actually here for.
2. Great speaking voice. Enunciation is spot on.
3. Speaks about all the tech without making me feel completely stupid.
4. Straight into what I'm actually here for. (Yes, I said this twice.)
Annunciation*
@@Jaybird98 Enunciation is the act of pronouncing words. ... Enunciation is from the Latin word enuntiationem, meaning “declaration.” Enunciation is more than pronouncing words clearly; it's expressing them well, too.
Please check the definition of Annunciation. I was clear when I meant he speaks well. He was not announcing the Incarnation.
Good day to you, sir.
@@triciap1874 Copy and paste doing you well huh? Lol
That's the best comeback you have? 😂😂 Boy, bye.
@@triciap1874 you didn't even come up with your own so it's better than yours lmao
People watching on QLED TV: "I don't see a difference in the space scenes"
Nice one
Smart
because this is a biased comparison and the winner depends on which side you're on so the winner is the sponsor.
Karmagiel yo im gonna try it rn and tell you jf it is true or not
QLED is an inferior panel, with poorer local dimming, and terrible HDR reproduction. Samsung’s QLED TVs are a terrible choice for 4K HDR movies and gaming.
Your voice is so incredible, in general, but also specifically for narration. The fact that your narration voice is so close to your regular speaking voice is really wild to me-like imagining you ordering food with adjustments in that voice tickles me so much. I love it, thanks for the amazing videos!
Jerry : The average person changes his TV every 4 or 10 years
Me : cries
Explain?
4:04 PM
12/17/2019
@Jake Waite Automated backlink script
4:42:22 PM
12/17/2019
You are below average
But his name is Zack
He’s right though ! Really tech savey people will change TVs every 1-4 years normal people 8- 10 years , the only thing that can change that are strangely enough large sporting events ( World Cup/super bowl) or large leaps in tech ie when HD/3D first came out
I prefer OLED cauz its punchy colours, true black etc....
Once you go OLED, you can't go back. MicroLED is the only thing that will get me to switch but that's still in development. All the benefits of OLED, but no burn in!
I think it's more or less the contrast that you're noticing. Color wise most of them are even.
@@TheCuriousNoob all the benefits of LCD like brightness too. But what if it has it's own drawbacks besides price.
@@SuCKeRPunCH187 It will have drawbacks I'm sure. Only time will tell!
OLED is beautifull indeed. But it's very reflective. It can be annoying. That's why in PC monitors there are no OLED screens.
Hmm looks like he have done a durability test of his left hand
Scratches at a level 1 cuts at a level 2
Test DI KAMPAK
*breaks at level 3*
that's the guy
😂🤣😂😂
has*
This video of the star field is the first I've ever seen, and wow does it so clearly point out the technological differences between two competing technologies, thank you for this!
I watched this video two years ago and it sold me on OLED, two years forward I still consider buying the OLED TV best purchase of my life.
@@sparoc3can you provide the link to the video please?
@@HTDChannel By "this" I meant this very video .
@@sparoc3 has there been any signs of pixel burn-in yet? Am curious about its sustainability.
@@lyden1633 Nope all good for me, coming up on the 4th year now.
Zac: So i've had these 2 tv's mounted on my wall for about a week now
MKBHD: Get my lawyers
Lmao same thing I thought, we got a new MKBHD
Koko BG hahahaaha
Except MHBHD usually holds his “Stuff” for about two weeks.
He fractured his bones at level 6 with deeper grooves at a level 7
The arm is held in place by 16 screws. Let's remove those to see what's underneath!
Lmfao 😂
@@chef2303 f*kn gold 😂😂😂
SHiN 🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂
Jerry: "So bones are bones and bones do break"
Electronics: "We call this karma"
Hahahahahaha.. bilkul
press Y for S ame
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂
Lol!
Hajajajja
This is the detail expected from a review to have a clarity on long-term buying items, awesome bro..
Must be nice to say "Hmm, I want a new TV for my office."
and LG says: "Here, have *two* ."
and they even gave a Samsung one lol
Linus needs to remodel his living room again!
Haha I thought the same thing
Especially if they then sent a Samsung as one of them...
“Let’s get started” *Tries to click* - *pained smile*
:')
help me reach my goal!
called a snap btw
Unnamed Unknown hell yea’
R J look out the window there’s a toenail
"Bones are bones and bones do break"
Get that on your cast
Scratches at level 6 with deeper grove at level 7 😅😅
Shit... can't like cause its 69....
@South Devon and Cornwall Trainspotting HD
Nah...not to me especially this one.
@South Devon and Cornwall Trainspotting HD he has it tattoo'd on his left butt cheek, or so I've heard. LMAO
Both seems great, but picture on the QLED looks a bit more natural than on OLED display. Taking price into consideration and I would probably go for QLED, especially because it has higher brightness, which is good when watching TV in daylight.
Oleds are coming down in price these days
@@George__-yz4ny when oled do u have?
@@formetoknow540 still 1k£ my friend
@Stewer1000 I got a c1 55 for £940 but return it cuz samsung s95b qled are brighter. back in 2017 they was £1.6k. U can get a c1 if they are still about 65 inches for £1.1k
@@formetoknow540 yeah it's still crazy expensive can't really justify paying double for oled probably
Me ( watching the oled screen stars from my LCD screen ) : wait a minute
😂
:-D
This can only happen when youtubers are bought by companies. Lol.
It depends on the dimming settings (the dimming system is much more advanced in the TVs, and the demo video exploits it)
This video is just demonstrating an extreme example of when OLED is better
LCD TVs can be much better in other scenarios like max brightness
Both TVs are great
(I own a LG C9 OLED)
probably you don't have local dimming...
His wrist snapped like a little lego.
😂😂😂
Best one so far
... after being scratched with a level 6 with deeper grooves at a level 7.
😂😂😂
BRO LMAO
Imagine Jerry walking into BestBuy with a microscope to decide which tv to buy lol
Hahaha you typed it, I thought it xD
😁😁
And a laptop
@Google LLC Hol' up
Lol
LG all the way baby! Bought my parents a 49 inch TV from them with OLED display after saving up for a year and its display is phenomenal for its price! Plus, the magic remote is definitely a selling point!
If ever watching Star Wars on a TV, it’s pretty clear Oled is the choice. Wow.
I've watched the entire saga of Star Wars on my qled by Hisense ,never complained once about the lack of stars on a qled type panel nor have I ever bitched about the contrast
@@dantasticmania8728 well if you don't know what you're missing out on of course you would think its fine. I'm sure if you switched you would tell the difference. It's like console players going from 60hz refresh rate to pc 120hz, they say console is fine the way it is, but after experiencing 120hz they realise what they were missing out on
@@DimzReacts Missing a few stars while still having a damn decent picture at an affordable price I'll take it. Second oleds aren't without picture flaws as well and can produce black crush or even lifted black in some instances. The whole 2.1 thing really doesn't matter to me since I mostly play single player games on consoles and from what I've heard not too many single player games are even going to be running at 120fps to begin with.Sorry but I don't mind missing out on a bunch of screaming foul mouthed 12-16 yr olds on the mic in broken game lobbies.
@@dantasticmania8728 yeah that's cool, my gaming laptop is 60hz and I get by just fine. But I reckon if I went to 120hz I would definitely see a difference. Each to their own I guess
@@dantasticmania8728 Dude it's not just colors and brightness, HDR is better, it displays millions more colors and more accurately. It has less latency, doesn't get as hot, and doesn't have terrible viewing angles. OLED isolate don't cost much more, no idea where you're getting the idea that OLED is more expansive. LCD is just so old it's dirt cheap. You'd save even more money if you bought a CRT TV. Not to mention AMOLED displays coming to TVs and monitors which is even better than OLED.
"Bones are bones and bones do break"
- Agent 47 as he threatens accomplices for information
The next Hitman movie better have this reference.
😂
"A broken wrist doesn't stop me to make videos"😂😂
As he threatens if they don't give him both TVs.
😂😂😂❤️
I went with a 65" LG C8 OLED this past spring. Been loving it ever since.
Those super-high contrast/bright color videos right next to a outdoor scene can be deceiving.
I am glad you did a side by side comparison of the same picture. It tells quite a tale.
I trust you after watching you on YT for years now.
Thank you for this review. I had some questions you thoroughly answered.
"It's playing the exact same video I promise" I loved this line lol
So this is what Hitman (47) does in his spare time
👍🏻🤣
Lol
It's agent 47 🙄
😆😆😆😆
Incoming comment from a white guy calling you racist as a stupid joke 🙄 lol haha
@@omarabdul2864 ?
I bet when jerry broke his wrist his reaction was "Oh, I hurt my wrist" in a very soft tone..
His bones failed the durability test 🤣
Snapped it like a little lego
Isn't his name Zack?
He was like: and deeper grobes at a level 7
While trying to break a durable phone
“It’s playing the exact same video. I promise.” 😂😂 this was funny
Zack: "Its playing the exact same video i promise"
Are you saying you don't think that it's the same video? I've seen this comparison in real life. It's real.
I... I honestly don't get what you want to say with that...
@@chanel_one I highly doubt that he is
MrRiddle0 - at 5:45 you can literally see it’s playing the same video, you see the little stars when he moves to the side.
How is this hard to believe
@@noisenoise9600 Yes I know. I wasn't referring to the video in my comment but to the person that I was replying to. In response to his/her response to the original comment.
"I want a TV and LG send me two"
Yeah thats the life I want
And life's good 😆
Lg sent a Samsung TV hmmmmm
OLED of course - Its pretty indicative when LG offers to also send their competitors product for a review (how considerate of them)!
Nah bruh. Better not have "true black" than a permanent burn it.
The Emperor it doesn’t burn in though... It has ways to protect the pixels from burn in.
@@brianpelfrey5788 Tell that to the ppl who got burn in.
@@theemperor1379 OLEDs are for people like me who don't use it a lot and use it primarily for movies, Tv shows, and videogames, and not as in regular TV and pc monitor.
@Top Dog don't care about it. I don't play enough at on time for it happen.
I worked for Japanese manufacturers selling pro-grade high end HDR monitors for the film, TV and video game markets. There was a very popular OLED HDR monitor for colour grading films that was quite beautiful looking with 1000 nits of brightness and full HDR10 and Dolby Vision rating. I was selling a competitive LCD model that was 1200 nits.
The OLED models were initially popular because the image was very striking. The black levels were undeniably great so the contrast looked amazing. The LCD models were better at colour accuracy but less impressive with black levels. The tie breaker actually came with time. The OLED monitors had a hard time with colour accuracy as previously mentioned but the black levels started to drift over time also. Consistency is key when colour grading and colour grading a project on OLED turned out to be troublesome. They would work on a project, take it to a screening room with a projector and it would look completely different.
Simply put. OLED ages as it is an organic material. If you like to keep your TVs for a decently long time, go LCD. Like Zack said, LED is just the lighting, it’s still an LCD TV.
A month later I want to add that my 2 Samsung 58” LCD TVs both have burned out lines within 2 years of owning them. I own a Panasonic plasma that is over 10 years old, has no burn in, no lines burned out and looks great.
A CCFL LCD TV would not have these issues as well. Those are super reliable on the long term. They only do FullHD, but that is ok for me. My genre of movies, arthouse, is never in 4K on BluRay/streaming. Black levels are amazing too, I've never seen as even backlit screens as old CCFL ones. Black is a very nice ultra dark gray from corner to corner, yet the coating is of a nice semi-matte anti glare quality no TV has today, so the blacks apear very solid even in bright lit rooms.
Just watched his old QLED sponsored video.
Advertising is powerful kids
Powerful and dangerous, if used as the only source for making a purchase decision.
From the last video he has now changed from Qled to Oled
So true... just a giant ad...
“LG sent me these two TVs” umm..
It’s interesting how money can change people’s opinion
I could listen to this while sleeping. His voice is so calming
Pretty gay
The silent *click* is my favorite TH-cam moment for 2019 👌
Agree.
Lol
Awesome demonstration of the technological differences. Thank you for your video!
i like the colours of Qled but i can have those backlights
you have only tu calibrate the oled, for a better colord ( need to add more warm)
I like you
@@fifagi Shutbup u dumbo Qled has much more better colour contrasts than Oled TV's.
@@suhaibaijaz4835 are you on crack? OLED virtually has an INFINITE contrast...In terms of color GAMUT, QLED may have the upper end, but that's only because the OLED is probably 8bit instead of 10bit. Also, since the QLED has backlights, it can get brighter and produce better dynamic range. Either way man, you gotta look at them in a store to really understand the difference.
Tf u saying
He probably wanted to see the structural integrity of his bones.
with deeper groves at scale 7
@@fforfahim he only did the bend test not the scratch test
This has sold me on getting an OLED TV, now I just have to find the extra money.... and the original money. :)
Save up a little more and get the Sony Oled if you want the tv to last for years.
@@LarsonChristopher ita a pitty that there is such a big price difference between LG-sony because sony has the better chip for viewing those lower resolution files dvd and lower At least that what i hear Have to bring a usn stick to the store with files to check how the LG handles that Also a pitty that LG dropped the zoom funktion in 9 series seemed a good way to zoom in 10% to get logos out of frame
Being an owner of both an LG OLED and the Samsung Q90r QLED series, i have to say i prefer the Q90r. I live in miami and if you need to watch tv in the day time with an OLED and cant close the curtains, you might as well not watch it at all. The glare of an OLED TV is almost like a mirror in certain scenarios. Though OLED has its perks (deeper blacks and colors), i can watch a dark movie in daylight and still be able to differentiate within the scene due to the higher peak brightness. Its all a matter of preference right now not which is better, your eyes cant differentiate between microscopic pixels and personally if you rewatch the waterfall segment it looks much better and detailed in the QLED TV.
@Alvin Walters c9 and Sonya a9g are fire.
@@CrazedBuffoon I am thinking the same thing when buying. About 7 or 8 years ago I bought a plasma for its superior image quality and p/p on purchase. But it has a glossy screen and it burns in if i play GTA for too long and there is the map constantly. It fades away eventually, but still. Its picture is, however, ridiculously good.
But for the most part, I just regret not buying an LCD back then... Simply for convenience. In my student apartment I have a 32" LCD tv. The picture quality is nothing to write home about, but it is good enough and i never think while watching a movie that the picture should be better.... I do however appreciate all the time that i can watch in any room at any time of the day.
I missed all the positive comments about QLED.
Me too.
Only brightness is better on qled
Less power consumption is one of them and it cost cheaper
@@TheMydem0 nah it´s not cheaper. A qled q90 and a LG cx is about the same price, you must be actually be braindead to buy a qled at that price. Q80 is about where it ends to make sense, q80 in my opinion a great value but prices above oled is far better.
@@yosefm170 yea QLED are cheaper, you can't find an OLED under $1000.
The agency has a new gadget for you to test, Agent 47.
A microscope for your eyes will come in handy.
Chi chan
U always comment something related to agent 47 😂😂
where
Lol you back again BiTcH
1:07 It was at that moment, Thanos knew he f***ed up
Ahhh ha, I get it now🤔😂
AJAJAJA 🤣🤣
“I am inevitable...oh wait a second”
I'm more interested to know how effective the anti-burn-in refresher thing, from some other sources it doesn't appear to be as effective as one hoped.
I have two old Panasonic 55 inch OLED TVs. To prevent burn in; First 100 hours of use, no gaming/no TV logos. I played full screen movies / DVD videos with no logos. Second, 100 to 1000 hours, no more than 2 hours of gaming/TV logos per day. Checked for image retention each day & watched hours of full screen video (no logos) each day. Third, after 1000 hours with no burn in, the TV could play games/TV logos normally but I’d still play movies/TV (no logos) to balance things out. ** I would do the same routine w/ a new LG OLED TV.
bb1111116 Well, I think I want a new TV to use however I pleased for many years to come, so unless OLED have this weakness resolved I wouldn’t want to buy one just yet.
I would have bough the LG if they would have had warranty also with burn in, they dont so I choose a Samsung QLED TV
SToXC_; what I’ve read about the built in anti-burn in is that it is an easy way to do what I did manually. I would use anti-burn in regularly if I got a new OLED TV.
Frank Wang; I understand. I am just hooked on those perfect blacks & the space images with clear stars as shown in Jerry’s video. I’m willing to put up with babying the TV in the first 1000 hours of use to get that great picture.
Quite a few comments, I'm sure it was mentioned, that for outdoors or highly lit areas, IPS/LCD panels can be much brighter. Also if HDR is your thing, LCD aka QLED can hit higher HDR and Dolby Vision levels than OLED. I'm waiting however for QD-OLED, that will be the ultimate.
Yeah he didnt even mention the brightness in the whole video, which is a very big deal tbh. The intense brightness QLED has definitely over the cheaper OLED TV's is insane. Like 800 nits VS 1600 nits easily. My friend bought a 2200 dollar OLED TV but my dad's 500 dollar QLED TV blew me away compared to the 2200 dollar one. The brightness is so amazing.
@@maxjames00077 Brightness is incredibly overated, you're not watching a movie with the blinds open. Contrast and blacks are much more prominent
@@blazesmooth5573 lol 11 momths old post. But nah most people watch TV with blinds open for sure. But even when u close them u need ur tv to pop to give a nice image. I never said oled isn't better but qled is way cheaper and definitely good
Love my LG OLED. Had to sell one of my kids to get it but that’s all In the past haha
Great viewing angles, huh?
**Soon at CES**
JerryRigEverything :
"thanks to Samsung for sponsoring this video".
and hopefully its microLED instead of yet more LCD crap
you know that Samsung also sell oled tv right....??
@@kylegun167 I dont think that Samsung sells OLED TV's but feel free to proof me Wrong.
Kyle Gun They dont
@@EspHack QLED isn't like your average LCD screen
Jerry:Safety is key
Jerry: I broke my arm
Hope you up and rigging soon man
His name is zack
Lucas Gawor it wasn't a joke so I'm sorry but r/iamverysmart
Lucas Gawor really nigga
Mr Nolalife u forgot to say r/ihavereddit
Lucas Gawor r/ihavereddit
r/itswooooshwith4os
I've had the LG OLED for almost 2 years now and hands down its the best TV I've ever had. Granted, I upgraded from a much older 1080p LCD. The burn in issue is real so be cautious. I was heavily using the display for about 3-4 months where the windows taskbar was present. Red colors from the chrome logo, and the windows store logo are burned into the bottom now. Its almost never an issue unless you are watching 16:9 content with solid bright colors. I just ended up hiding the taskbar and getting used to that. Overall, I'd say even with the risk of burn in, this TV has been the best entertainment experience I've ever had and well worth the money!
next time get that warranty from Best Buy that covers burn in
@@seanwilson9502 oh dang, I should have gotten that! Thanks for the heads up!
@@anthonygreen440 I’m about to buy the new Sony A90J my first OLED and the only reason I’d buy at BB is the burn in warranty. I’m glad you said it’s still worth the risk! I’m like F it try something new lol
With a microscope, you can seen each individual dollar you lost on those tvs
Lol
He got it for free, he's sponsored.
@Warm Soft Kitty You are utterly insane to think that LG wouldn't spend $3000 to get 1.9 million views. That's practically free advertising for them. A 30-second cable television commercial costs well over $650k.
Warm Soft Kitty Yes… they do… 3k is practically free advertising for them…
Boy, that pfp reminds me of something
Next video: Glass vs Bone - With a Telescope
✌✌
😂
Its soooo sad that we can't hear him *click his fingers* 😢
Well, he has two hands, doesnt he?
lmao
Like
Bruh😂
@@popiezius2781 he intentionally clicks his broken hand for entertainment though, i think that he would click the non-broken arm normally
The video played at 3:25, the link given for this in description is broken. Please can you check and update the video link?
Was it just me or was anyone else scared the TV would fall off while he was peeling off the plastic sticker?
This mans voice is so relaxing to listen to. And he is pretty easy on the eyes too.
He was probably trying to bend a Nokia
ahhahahahaha
So that means Nokia 800 Tough durability test is coming???
Lmao 😂
Hahahahaha
I wish Nokia start to make cars, cause it would sound like a hater brand - "no Kia"
I’d like to hear you say this quote: “No lieutenant your men are already dead.” Agent Smith - The Matrix 1999. Smooth and clear voice you have. In all seriousness thank you for explaining the difference between these two TVs.
Jerry rigs everything literally even his own arm.
Arm tear down and reassembly
Let us wait as he might make it transparent or might ask dbrand to make a skin for his broken arm.
All of u nailed it bro
@@UnrulyYute ifixit should provide him with a new replaceable bone
"My skin scratches at a level 7 with deeper grooves at a level eight"
Jerry’s Famous Quote:
Glass is glass and glass can break
Now: Bones are bones and bones can break
youtube comments are comments and these comments are unoriginal
His name is Zack.
@@Alwynfu no one cares
@@Alwynfu Your mom's name is Susan.
So what's your point?
I'm gonna buy the OLED TV to watch those star fields in Star Wars.
What are you watching this video on? Becaose if it's not an oled screen you don't know what it actually looks like
@@obi-wankenobi8406 most high end phones have OLED display so he might actually do
@@obi-wankenobi8406 as long as hes not watching this video on a full array backlight monitor, hes gonna see the diffrence. the whole problem with the stars is the full array backlight.
Go for SONY BRAVIA A9G 4K HDR OLED
@@obi-wankenobi8406 You died long ago. You are a ghost. I'm scared 😬
I have an Oled and a Qled. Whenever I'm watching movies about stars I prefer the Oled hands down. But when I'm watching content especially outdoor nature documentaries in daylight I prefer the Qled. As can be seen in the mountain scene at 6:27 the Oled is blue, but the Qled has more realistic earth tones. Also in the upper right of the screen the Oled clipped off the top of the mountain with overblown whites.
Oled is better but defaults.for.some.reason are set to alot of cold color settings I don't know why
Not like I'm two years late to the party but the OLED did not clip any of the highlights. It's just Zach's camera that doesn't have quite the dynamic range to capture the OLED's image.
Also, one doesn't have "more realistic earth tones," as was said in the video, both TVs are running with the default out of the box setting. If you pay an extra couple of 10s of dollars at the store, they'll calibrate the colors for you.
It's hard to believe that a video was playing on the QLED at all in that stars/dark scene. If it was, then the OLED looked much better obviously, but then after, when you showed the landscape videos of the trees, the QLED picture looked much better.
Yes, even i think those landscapes looked better in Qled. I wonder why? Someone pls explain.
Because Jerry rigged everything! 🤣
@@apoorvappychoudhary392 The TVs were out of the box and not calibrated. He really should have calibrated both displays to do a test like this.
The same panel from the same model can vary from screen to screen, let alone two different technologies from two different manufacturers.
LG might prefer a certain color temperature/settings for their sets and Samsung another. If they were calibrated, they would be much easier to compare unbiased.
@@TheCuriousNoob ya right. Makes sense.
I do have to agree with you. They have a much warmer picture than the OLED.
0:35 "LG sent me two TVs to compare [one of theirs and one from their main competitor]"
Gee, I wonder which one is going to win. Sure would be awkward if LG lost in their own sponsored video!
Thats why i see it a bit bias, they might have got a lower quality model.
I personally preferred the colours on the QLED TV. I felt they were too saturated on the OLED, which is weird seeing I prefer OLED screens over LCD screens on phones
@@franklingoodwin As @JerryRigEverything
mentioned, both TVs were set to default profiles out of box. LG has really good color management settings on their TVs, you can adjust the picture to whatever color profiles that suits you best. One thing the QLED can't do, is exactly what @JerryRigEverything demonstrated, the concept of "infinite contrast". I'd rather grab the OLED to get a feature the QLED can't match, then adjust the OLED to my color preference liking.
😉 Truth in advertising. His review and assessment isn't wrong, hands down, OLED is better in just about every level of comparison tests, but you'll be hard pressed to spot the differences. We're fast approaching the law of diminishing returns. They're all looking great, even the cheap TV's. So 8K is the next up sell, from there, 🤷🏽♂️
@@franklingoodwin On a phone, because of its screen size, all looks great, but blow that up to 55" or more and you'll notice those color washouts. I preferred the QLED colors as well.
Wish you speedy recovery Jerry!! Love from India!
do u have a phone to sell,,, with amoled,, i can buy it
@@muki_x forgive him...english may not be his first language
@Crazy Joe mocking someone who is giving well wishes to someone else? Really shows your quality and standard.
@@Mike-gk7qh how is this reply even related to my comment?
@@arjund2018 it sure isn't.. but I definitely don't find any lingual mistakes in my comment, do you?
The way he explain about oled tech is awesome. Crystal clear
every youtuber ever: I need this expensive thing.
company: ok, make an ad and you will get it for free.
guess yt not paying as the good old days
@@ishid_anfarded_king Lagner "ruining their pay" man do you even think they deserve the lifestyles they get by just making the kind of TH-cam videos they do, really....
This channel is a good channel but it does not mean they should be earning soo much but they do and they still will, not really a great contribution at all to society but hey they help you decide what is worth buying, right... Or you could use your own brain and research and even check in stores yourself to know what you would like.. But hey, let's worry about that guys pockets shall we.. Pathetic
@@Dz-em2wl Nice paragraphs
@@Dz-em2wl Oh yea because all electronic stores have someone knowledgeable all the time in there working and assisting you, Most times I ask people they just talk out there ass. Let people learn how they want and assist others with their insight & let the world learn.
Parents should have taught you the following "If you have nothing good to say then don't say anything at all".
@@Dz-em2wl ok boomer
5:43 "The stars show up a lot better on one screen than they do the other."
Hell, it's almost that they show up on one screen *and not* the other.
This is LG sponsoring ...I have a Sony X950G LED and it shows stars perfectly with minimal blooming. I would only recommend OLED if you only watch movies in a dark room as OLED tend to look dim in light filled room.
oled is 2x expensive then qled
@@andreasstamatakis4983 Yep, OLED's are not as bright as most LED or LCD displays, and they consume more power
@@andreasstamatakis4983 please provide the link of star video
@@andreasstamatakis4983 that's what i thought. the other videos comparison the samsung look better. My living room is attached to a sunroom so brightness is important to me. i have the ks8000 and i will admit it's not made for HDR contents to be watch during the day, but at night it's ok. The ks8000 look better during the day than any other oled tv i owned at that time. I don't even watch a lot of hdr contents so i saved my money by returning the oled tv.
But the real question here is:
*Does it scratch at level 6 with deeper grooves at level 7?*
Dude they don't add Gorilla glass for TV
It's broken at level 1 with even more damage after doing the same thing at level 2.
idk but bones is bones , bones can break
@@Whis19 I think he was joking...
😂😂😂
Thank you for making this video, it has helped me make a decision for a new TV. I've had mine for about 7 years, and it's finally starting to have issues that I can't ignore anymore... it randomly disconnects itself from the internet, sometimes won't turn on until unplugged and plugged back in. Time for an upgrade!!
got the LG C9 OLED 55" recently, loving every moment of it, might upgrade to a 65" next year
I would worry about the burn in
We have a 42 plasma now, and I really like the 55 lg oled!!
Dennis Dotson I play with my C8 on the daily since a year and got no burn in.
@@ede8193 I went to c8 oled from a 8 years old plasma (which was great at the time). After 8 months I still cannot believe seeing floating images in completely black surroundings when a movie begins. Only who has an oled knows what I mean...
@@kevinschlueter9835 A year is nothing. You'll get burn-in inevitably.
QLED is a marketing move from Samsung, QLED and OLED sound similar (thats what the marketing move was for) but have NOTHING in common.
Many people, including my brother, thought/think that QLED is as good as OLED because the names are nearly the same. He went out and bought a QLED.
QLEDs are REGULAR LCD Panels with the only difference that they are „powered“ by „Quantum Dot“ Leds.
QLED TVs come in with the same positive and negative aspects as LCD/LED TVs.
I hope one day that all ppl will get this.
They are not even true Quantum DOTS. That technology will be superior to OLED but it is still 5-8 years away and Samsung is a big investor in it.
1:08 adorable version of thanos
Why
OLED for sure!!! Damn I didn't expect this much of a difference in videos with stars and stuff
3:41
"Playing the exact same video *I promise* "
Aww😂
the right tv is actually playing a video, since it was Qled u can't see that clearly
Where can I find this video?
OLED Army checking in.
I've dropped thousands of dollars on oleds. Worth every penny.
He doesn't need to tell this he is true that everyone knows
@@elhugeo I played this video on my Samsung Q50, and I have no idea why they keep this lie in every comparison - I can see everything in this starfield video. QLED is more than good enough.
Lovely comparison 👍👍
Why this comment not have reply lol
@@ReirtoRRNTX Then what are you?
@@shafiekxiang2105 lol its take 3 months to wait other lol
Zach: So I've had these TVs hung up for a week now
MKBHD: Our battle will be legendary!
Or
MKBHD: Our battle will be legendary!
MKBHD: I've been thinking about our battle for a week now
@@_zer05ive damn nice one bro 😂😂😂😂😂
WOW.. thank you... you make stuf SO simple yet so informative !! ( sorry for your arm hope it heals well) this was Super helpful to me..thank you !!
"I've had these two TV's mounted on my wall for about a week now."
Are we just going to skip over that MKBHD jab?
MKBHD is in a whole nother realm. Put some respek on his name.
@@chriss.8291 Oh please, the dude literally said he was just done reviewing two phones and when given a blind camera comparison, he couldn't tell half the time which one was which, and said "the pixel took this pic" based on what looked better. He's a sham now. Used to be a fan in 2013, too.
@@chriss.8291 That guy is good with video production, but when it comes to the technical stuff this dude is far superior.
@@kerodfresenbetgebremedhin1881 maybe you're just a racist and you hate black people
@@father4732 wut?
1:14 "So I have had these 2 TVs for over a week now"
Is this MKBHD?😂
Yeeeesss
Zack’s bones show light scratches at a level 7 and deeper groves when falling off of a ladder.
Just a Dude lol
So glad I chose OLED over QLED last week. Waiting for delivery now.
Great review!
Oled overrated
I honestly like the color on the QLED, but overall I like the OLED more
If they were calibrated then the colours would be pretty much identical. The difference then would come down to luminance, nit levels and black levels
@@HomeTheatreEngineering OLED would win in black levels considering each pixel can turn off and produce 0 light, unlike LCD.
Brandt Foerster me too.
Home Theatre Engineering no it would not, OLED cannot produce the same level of filtered light QLED can, you always left with a cool blue picture. And more so as it ages.
The Q90 is roughly twice as bright as the LG..... it has anti reflection that the LG cant touch..... fair more details in the brighter colours too.
Bones are bones and bones do break.
- Zack, 2019-
scratch at level 6 with deeeeeeeper groves at christmas lights level
What's the obsession lately with people repeating in the comments what we already heard in the video?
This comment was copied exactly from the video..
Come on man at least try
Zack: oled or qled?
Me: Laughs in 14 inch CRT
lol
You probably get insane response time on games though
I have a 13 inch CRT
It’s Zack
That sweet 480p n instant response times
6:14 as 'realistic' (as in, true-to-vision) the QLED may be, I think I prefer OLED.
How do I explain this? When juxtaposing the QLED to the OLED,
one feels like the image result of really good eye vision, while the other looks like the result of a really good camera, photoshop and all.
He looks like Vin Diesel of electronics
”I live my life rigging one phone at a time”
Kohtupora Nah he looks like a default skin for humans
So... Family
Speaking of phones. I’m still waiting the razr video -.-
Hyvä nimi
JerryRigEverything after breaking wrist:
We can see the wrists scratches at level 3 and breaks at level 8
unexpected
😂😂
Zack: *"Bones are bones and bones DO break!"*
Everyone else in the comments: _BoNeS aRe BoNeS aNd BoNeS BrEaKs_
No
Bones (Plural) + v1 (break) so it's bones break
Zack is the one who is grammatically correct here.
i'm trying to look for a new tv, and thanks to your video ( a very clear understandable resources) it's making my decision a lot easier. Keep up the the good work.
meanwhile: our tv is 25 years old, and its older than me and my older cousin lol
haha i often visit my grandparents' house and they still use one which is 31years old
@@shanewilliams5771 my grnadparents have 2 better TV then me, one of them is 55" :D I have an old 21" CRT TV. Of course I never use it :D
@Heaven Gaming Official LMAO dude..... WTF
@Heaven Gaming Official well I have the same phone for over 3 years and my parents think it can work another 10 years
You poor son of a B.
when Micro-LED comes out thats when display standards reach perfection. has advantages of both worlds with no compromises
I hope that when emissive Micro-LED displays come, the plasma purists shut off about their pioneer kuro's.
Can`t wait micro led tv...right now I use one year old samsung Qled and it is stunning for gaming and movies. Never want to deal burn in issues with Oled tv-s until they give at least warranty more than 7 years.
you reckon it would carry a big price tag?
@@DocTime56 i know right, them plasma purist are so stuck on their views.
@@sm7085 th, but everything is expensive at first.
so, when is microled coming to the market...so we can see oled vs microled..?
Hi Jerry! Seriously, every time that I want to check some reviews and I see that you have a video, I always go for it!! Your work is amazing!!
I have a LG C8 55* and is extremely happy with both the interface and the fantastic picture quality. I don't fear to much for burn ins as the screen saver in it self is a burnfixer.
I have also LG
Here’s why I’m getting a led... I want an 82” or 85” tv. Sony, Samsung, and LG sell led tv’s that size for $3500 or less. Oled tv’s are much more expensive, especially when you are looking for something over 75”.
100% correct.... same reason for me as well.... OLED is interesting but the picture is not much better. Honestly in the side by side comparisons the waterfall has much more detail on the QLED.
What do you think about a Sony Full Array LED?
@@shanejack8890 try looking at the tvs irl. OLED looks much better in a dark room, but about the same in a brightly lit room.
@@gakuto7728 nope Qled Outperform OLED big time in a bright room talking from experience!.. got an OLED and I can barely see the screen doing daytime couse my living room is very bright.. so Personally DO I NOT recommend Oled if you're gonna place it in bright room! But no dout a better Picture if you're in dark room or at later hour's.. also The OLED at least In Denmark start at a price that's like atleast 300-500$ more than the rest of the tv's... All that been said I do love my TV images after the day hours 😍😍
Oleds are expensive for a reason, they are easily the best panel out there.
JerryRigEverything: so I’ve been using these TVs for about a week now.
*MKBHD has entered the chat*
Great Video presentation, After 10 years my current TV has chosen to end its life so I am beginning my research on the newer tech that is out there... I found your video very informative. Thanks
I wonder what happened to your tv that caused it to take the harsh decision of committing suicide.