Today's session confirms three things. One is that Ntanzi was indeed assaulted. If you really listen to his voice projection when it comes to narrating how he was assaulted and how it happened including how each individual participated in the assault itself, you will clearly see that he is telling the truth. Two is that someone in police had a caring heart to leak out to Mngomezulu how police framed Ntanzi. That is why there appears to be places where Mngomezulu was definitely sure of and Ntanzi wasn't. To some, this might appear as inconsistency but it is not. It just shows that there might have been a police officer who fought on the side of Ntanzi for justice to be served. Three is that the line of Sibanda's questioning today shows that the state is now clutching at straws. Four is that the Judge uses a different criteria of interjecting between defense and the state. He kept quite when Sibanda incorrectly put to the witness that according to the AVL report, the car did not stop at Baragwana hospital because it said GPS locked. If anyone listened carefully to the expert witness, he said GPS locked means there is no signal at that place and so we cannot tell whether the car was moving or not. That means it is possible that the car stopped and it is also possible that it did not. If anything, the state should have some explaining to do on why the AVL kept locking in areas that were to the disadvantage of their version.
@@KennyMulaudzi yes but that was before the AVL report was brought and admitted as evidence. When Sibanda here says "evidence before this court shows that the vehicle did not stop" he is referring to the AVL report and not what Mngomezulu put to Mogane.
It's weird how niknax is just mute enjoying shanghwari repeating dumb questions and disrepecting Ntanzi but if it was defense he could have long opened his stinking mouth 🤮Continue being consistent Ntanzi the truth shall sets you free babe🙏🏿
The State is struggling to link Ntanzi with Senzo murder case. Ntanzi explained exactly what happened to him(torcher/abused). State is just going round in circle.
Ekubeni wayeshawelani uNtanzi if they had all the evidence against him for the murder of Meyiwa? I urge everyone to watch Mshololo cross examination of Gininda, take notice of that last question she asked him. She asked if Gininda had ever been accused of forcing accused persons of making statements. Ntanzi was made to sign all these docs. He didn't say all these things. This is why he was tortured in that way. If the state has compelling evidence against someone there absolutely is no need to force to make a confession unless ofcourse if they are trying to frame them so that those who paid them (state) will get away with it.
That question was withdrawn by Mshololo and does not for part of the court record. She was showboating by asking a question that she knew was objectionable. She likes making useless sensational statements direct at the peanut gallery, who unquestioningly gulps it up!
Mxm there's no case here for these guys before this court, This prosecutor's question needs Ntanzi to be rough when giving answers, more like Julius Malema
Most of the things that are being asked to Ntanzi and his answers are lost in translation. The interpreter was supposed to be someone from deep KZN not Johannesburg or Durban because their isiZulu is not the same
As far as I see most of the people here, doesn't want justice for Senzo. Most of them, they are just entertaining themselves. Why you always criticize the state? They want justice for Senzo's family. I'm soo sad. People don't want to follow the case, they are the judges, lawyers, but they didn't know nothing about the law, to them this case is a joke. Wait until this happen to your parents, sister, brother, child or your relative. You will need support forgetting, that you were swearing at judges and lawyers. People are dying like flies, and there are adults that act like children. Mxim
Not even Senzo's family wld say ths nonsense,,,,,, it's obvious enough to us that thy innocent we dnt need degrees for that ishh!!!!!we want justice not to b liked by accused suphapha
you are simply bluffing, you can inly fool yourself, sadly Chicco n Longwe including Gininda are already exposed by the very law the current judicial proceeding.
If Ntanzi indeed confirmed that he killed Senzo, why there was a need to go to his place of work to confirm if he was at work or not and why they have to go to do doctor to check his teeth?
Come on South Africans Ntanzi is not a different case, y'all know what happens when SAPS is dealing with a suspect, . people deny their involvement. Ntanzi chooses which events to remember correctly even if it's easy questions,.
Guys in case law a person can never be 100% correct. It is necessary for a human being to have errors in conveyance of evidence or statement. The judges and magistrates knows that. Ntanzi may be right but he is a human being he is also privy to errors. Errors does not constitute guiltiness. But deviations can cause serious harm to his statement. We must also keep in mind that Ntanzi was not taking notes on all this ordeal and the alleged torture he suffered.
You're correct Mr, we should also take into account that trauma,fatigue,sleep deprivation n poor hygiene has affected him very bad n i believe that his memory got a huge blow
Are we watching the same trial? Sibanda is poking holes at Ntanzi's credibility. Ntanzi's is unable to explain why his version on the stand has changed from what he told his lawyer.
Having the necessary exposure in the process of arrest. The witness version is what is general practice in the cells. Even 35 a rights. You leave the charge and fill out everything else... get the accuse to sing and you write the charge after. Then give him the copy. OB it is only strict police that would write themselves. 90%, you write your own OB entry. The keys and cell allocation, is also true the cell guard would inform you which cell is free you, take the person yourself.
I have arrested and handed more than 15 people to SAPS for detention but I have never written in an OB only signed. But it could be because I am not a member of SAPS
Cannot remember food he was given but remembers the keys cells mattress. Cannot remember if Engen had a shop from inside a Fortuner Don't know English but able to read Alberton and pronounce well. There's absolutely nothing wrong with questions, this is prosecution not pampering.
He is not the prosecutor is trying to make a case without actually facts Ntanzi hasn't changed his story papalakhe is trying to trick Ntanzi with sequence of events to make an impression that Ntanzi's testimony is fabricated, he was indeed tortured & assaulted if they didn't he wouldn't be in the dock today he was not offered tea & cakes to confess cumon wake up
4:32:00 Not truth, where is the defense?? The left Police station to Court; from Court via Alberton to Soweto and from Soweto to Rustenburg. The Defense do your job bathong....
Sibande purposefully moves from one topic to another and the randomly bounces back to the same topics. This is a typical tactic used when the advocate is of the opinion that the witness is sticking religiously to a prepared narrative as opposed to telling the truth. The defence and the judge will recognise the tactic and allow it. That is the reason why there is not much objections from the defence and the judge.
The asault at the 'garbage dumping site' vs AVL showing no stoppage will need to be addressed by the defence. Especially since the judge is of the opinion that there is no 'garbage dumping site' in the area.
@@somilangaye9465 I think he’s been able to show that Ntanzi is not a credible witness based on two things, 1. His version changes depending on the facts put to him e.g AVL, 2. His version cannot be verified by any other evidence or witness, not even his own words which are not reliable because he tends to forget crucial details.
Listening to Ntanzi,somewhere he is contradicting himself and sort of denying what Mr Mngomezulu said because mostly the defence says what it's told by the accused
Mgumezulu had his way of attacking state as an advocate (u dnt go straight, u apply tricks) Ntanzi is straight n forward. He is ryt to say he will not comment on Mngumezulu's version
@@bigdala365bw4Mngo may use his trick and tactics, but the versions of Mngo and Nthanzi should not contridict each other. The judge now needs to decide who is telling truth between Mngo, Nthanzi and the prosecution. Normally, the judge needs to simply decide between the defence and the prosecution, not three parties.
in this part of evidence the state wants to prove that, the 1st and 2nd accused were not 1. Intimidated, 2. Tortured, 3. Abused, and 4. Coerced to sign documents. That the accused made a "confessions" a. Volunteery, and b. Without being assaulted. According to my little knowledge, the state has dismally failed so far to dispute the fact that, accused persons were not beaten up by the police. That's why the state has brought so many witnesses to explain processes at police stations, that were never being followed. It is a well known facts that police always do something else and when being asked about it they'll ran to protocols and standard procedures. We all know that
Sibanda is using this opportunity to record Nthanzi's newly revised version. Sibiya is asking questions from all angles so that Ntanzi and the defence have very little room to further change their version in the mail trial. Remember that the prosecution will still be bringing more witnesses and evidence in the main trail.
The merits and demerits of the evidence from Mr Ntanzi and from the prosecution will be weighed by the judge before it comes to the decision but it looks like the writing is on the wall...12/2/2024
The defence juxtaposed the dates of the assault and the confession. The 18th vs 19th. They somersaulted when they received the AVL document. But, there is still the issue of whether the assault happened by day or by night. Nthanzi is not able to explain the discrepancy.
I dont see Ntanzi winning this one because if he can't answer what his lawyer was asking the witnesses then it means Mngomezulu's questions won't be taken seriously
Ramos & Mngoz were suppose to object; especially element of time plus street names. Their client mentioned things, example Dumping place in Alberton; Gate with Orlando; unused ATMs and rectifying the State when the wrong version or record is put. The evidence led by the state was the car left Moroka (Mabena forget the key) and went to Vorslorus Court and from the court via Alberton to Moroka and from Moroka to Rustenburg.
Why keep on asking about time hence ntsnzi tells the court dat he never have a watch he is not familiar with Gauteng but keep on asking about buildig weak evidence from the state
So that when new evidence or withnesses are introduced in the main trial, Nthanzi will not be able to suddenly remember the time and duration in the main trial when it suits Nthanzi's version or movements.
These are all necessary questions to the Mr. Ntanzi, because you need to know when and where and if these assaults did take place. For example, they collected me from Tembisa Police Station and then took me to a certain place where they then assaulted and tortured me. All of these actions do have a time frame that needed to be compared to the vehicle tracking systems of the vehicle used. Assault and tortured do not take 5 min of that I am certain.
I honestly think the judge is bullying Mshololo in the court room. We used get an amazing energy as a country from Msho but lately when even she objects the judge is fighting her 🤔🤔
The judge will not have a. very difficult job/task in deciding which version to believe between the 02 ...Policemen, Magistrate, interpret, AVL expert and Mr B.S. Ntanzi ...12/2/2024
But the version that at some stage in Carltonville Sibanye mine Mogane, Mabhena and Accused No2 went to the Mine (Medic) Hospital....the inly place they visited (at least on the evidence adfuced) is HR Building to see as ti whether the fellow was at work or not ..this version is "New" possibly Adv Sibande will pick it up. Correct me guys if m wrong..12/2/2024
Yes. The mine hospital is part is a new version, I think even for the defence team. Had Nthanzi told his advocates, they would have asked him to omit the part where he gives concent for the SAPS to obtain his medical records.
we should not forget that kininda in his own words said that him "himself" and the AVL expert "both" have worked on the AVL report before it was to be brought to court, in order to give the state the "dates and routes" that has been requested Now it is an obvious thing that, the report was worked on by the master mind "kininda" himself, to suit a particular narrative 🤦🏿
It was cooked especially on the benoni police workshop story where it was allegedly booked for repairs meanwhile jonathan has corroborated ntanzi's version that the car was used on the 24th which confirms that indeed it was never faulty n no mechanic was called during the night the car was purpoted to be faulty
Sibanda has enger issues he's not right according to talk to peoples, what i noticed he want Ntanzi to accept what he don't know. he's failing in other way.
The tactic is designed to confuse Nthanzi so that it becomes difficult for Nthanzi to stick religiously to his narrative. Nthanzi seems to be aware of that, so it is not having the desired effect. When Nthanzi is unsure, Nthanzi gives a vague answer or pledges confusion.
Watever people might say this judge is not stupid,this Ntazi guy he have nothing to do with this case....Ballistic expect says it all unless mina ngilandela Icela elihlukile
Today's session confirms three things. One is that Ntanzi was indeed assaulted. If you really listen to his voice projection when it comes to narrating how he was assaulted and how it happened including how each individual participated in the assault itself, you will clearly see that he is telling the truth. Two is that someone in police had a caring heart to leak out to Mngomezulu how police framed Ntanzi. That is why there appears to be places where Mngomezulu was definitely sure of and Ntanzi wasn't. To some, this might appear as inconsistency but it is not. It just shows that there might have been a police officer who fought on the side of Ntanzi for justice to be served. Three is that the line of Sibanda's questioning today shows that the state is now clutching at straws. Four is that the Judge uses a different criteria of interjecting between defense and the state. He kept quite when Sibanda incorrectly put to the witness that according to the AVL report, the car did not stop at Baragwana hospital because it said GPS locked. If anyone listened carefully to the expert witness, he said GPS locked means there is no signal at that place and so we cannot tell whether the car was moving or not. That means it is possible that the car stopped and it is also possible that it did not. If anything, the state should have some explaining to do on why the AVL kept locking in areas that were to the disadvantage of their version.
Thank you for this fine analysis. I appreciate you sharing your thoughts on this platform. Very informative.
@@anastasiakhumalo6985 thank you for the complimentary remarks. It's fully appreciated. 🙏
👏
On AVL report for bara that’s how Mngomezulu put it to mogane
@@KennyMulaudzi yes but that was before the AVL report was brought and admitted as evidence. When Sibanda here says "evidence before this court shows that the vehicle did not stop" he is referring to the AVL report and not what Mngomezulu put to Mogane.
It's weird how niknax is just mute enjoying shanghwari repeating dumb questions and disrepecting Ntanzi but if it was defense he could have long opened his stinking mouth 🤮Continue being consistent Ntanzi the truth shall sets you free babe🙏🏿
I don’t know if I can get a hold of you but I have a question for you about the car that I have for
@@tebogosodaba5568 hahaha ask here
Justice for Ntanz!!!?? State must fall.
He must be freed this is so unfair!
@@ngwana3372How is it unfair? Unfair trail or what?
i literally can't listen to Sibanda's questions...Adv. Baloyi I miss you sir with your British English and calm demeanor
Lol 😂
I thought I'm the only one. He is really irritating
😂😂😂😂Sibanda umbhedo and he is using this opportunity to shine in front of the caremas
My heart bleeds listening to Ntanzi, may the truth and justice prevail.
Thanks Mr Mnisi 🙏
Listening to Ntanzi he indeed was Framed
The State is struggling to link Ntanzi with Senzo murder case. Ntanzi explained exactly what happened to him(torcher/abused). State is just going round in circle.
Fabrication. Cooked evidence by the state.
Ekubeni wayeshawelani uNtanzi if they had all the evidence against him for the murder of Meyiwa? I urge everyone to watch Mshololo cross examination of Gininda, take notice of that last question she asked him. She asked if Gininda had ever been accused of forcing accused persons of making statements. Ntanzi was made to sign all these docs. He didn't say all these things. This is why he was tortured in that way. If the state has compelling evidence against someone there absolutely is no need to force to make a confession unless ofcourse if they are trying to frame them so that those who paid them (state) will get away with it.
That question was withdrawn by Mshololo and does not for part of the court record. She was showboating by asking a question that she knew was objectionable. She likes making useless sensational statements direct at the peanut gallery, who unquestioningly gulps it up!
Mxm there's no case here for these guys before this court, This prosecutor's question needs Ntanzi to be rough when giving answers, more like Julius Malema
Most of the things that are being asked to Ntanzi and his answers are lost in translation. The interpreter was supposed to be someone from deep KZN not Johannesburg or Durban because their isiZulu is not the same
True
It sounds like the translator is a Ndebele speaking person
Both of Ntanzi’s lawyers are Zulu speaking and are not objecting.
That is so true. I am surprised why is Mnisi not objecting.
@@underdog209is Ramosepele Zulu?
Sibande is asking stupid questions.
1. You cannot contradict the questions between the two dates.
2. The state has no case in this moment.
Like abomshololo nabo babebuza imibuzo engayindawo kofakazi
As far as I see most of the people here, doesn't want justice for Senzo. Most of them, they are just entertaining themselves. Why you always criticize the state? They want justice for Senzo's family. I'm soo sad. People don't want to follow the case, they are the judges, lawyers, but they didn't know nothing about the law, to them this case is a joke. Wait until this happen to your parents, sister, brother, child or your relative. You will need support forgetting, that you were swearing at judges and lawyers. People are dying like flies, and there are adults that act like children. Mxim
Not even Senzo's family wld say ths nonsense,,,,,, it's obvious enough to us that thy innocent we dnt need degrees for that ishh!!!!!we want justice not to b liked by accused suphapha
you are simply bluffing, you can inly fool yourself, sadly Chicco n Longwe including Gininda are already exposed by the very law the current judicial proceeding.
The average population is below average in this country that’s why ANC still leading US🤦♂️
💯
@@ndubanesol111 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣your crazy.longwe what?🤷🏾♂️
Justice to ntazi plz 🙏
The cells had no water like really ??????
With all this that is happening to Senzo meyiwa case the state could rather just end this case. The state wants to arrest the innocent ones
If Ntanzi indeed confirmed that he killed Senzo, why there was a need to go to his place of work to confirm if he was at work or not and why they have to go to do doctor to check his teeth?
Come on South Africans Ntanzi is not a different case, y'all know what happens when SAPS is dealing with a suspect, . people deny their involvement. Ntanzi chooses which events to remember correctly even if it's easy questions,.
this Ntanzi son, his so consistent in his version, and Sibande his trying hard to discredit him 😂😂😂 poor Sibande
Guys in case law a person can never be 100% correct. It is necessary for a human being to have errors in conveyance of evidence or statement. The judges and magistrates knows that. Ntanzi may be right but he is a human being he is also privy to errors. Errors does not constitute guiltiness. But deviations can cause serious harm to his statement. We must also keep in mind that Ntanzi was not taking notes on all this ordeal and the alleged torture he suffered.
I can not agree with you more, you explain with clarity. Such human errors are afforded to all of the lay witnesses.
You're correct Mr, we should also take into account that trauma,fatigue,sleep deprivation n poor hygiene has affected him very bad n i believe that his memory got a huge blow
Are we watching the same trial? Sibanda is poking holes at Ntanzi's credibility. Ntanzi's is unable to explain why his version on the stand has changed from what he told his lawyer.
You should also remember some of witnesses denied being near the garage until AVL was introduced
@@abongilebaleka3712True that, but those people are not on trial.
Contradictions between Ntanzi and Mngomezulu
😂😂
Sibanda is a joke
Futhi not even a joke ididi straight
Ntanzi is throwing his lawyer under the bus
People just have internet but not brains.
Thank you 100%
Wat is sibanda trying to do is he trying to assist south African to understand how was senzo killed or is he trying for a conviction
They pinning accused 😢
Bonke labo abathi laba bafana babulala uSenzo kodwa uNkulunkulu owayebona konke akasona isilima njengaloSibanda ozenza inkunzi yomshushisi udoti wesigebengu uze uphike nje kanti wawuhamba nabo udakiwe uyangenyanyisa
USenzo wafela ejele noma kwaKelly hamba uyobuza bona uyeke izingane zabantu pho yayiyokwenzani imoto uvumani uNtanzi kodwa ngiyenyanya uSibanda uyeyisa
@Eu68345 People are just ignorant 🙄 and Naive barwele dihoogklap knowing that it happened ko spaza house 🏠
@@mariamasetloa6272case closed
Having the necessary exposure in the process of arrest. The witness version is what is general practice in the cells.
Even 35 a rights. You leave the charge and fill out everything else... get the accuse to sing and you write the charge after. Then give him the copy.
OB it is only strict police that would write themselves. 90%, you write your own OB entry. The keys and cell allocation, is also true the cell guard would inform you which cell is free you, take the person yourself.
Your statement is not true. if you're a cop your police station should be investigated for flaunting the standing orders. Cell keys been given to who?
I have arrested and handed more than 15 people to SAPS for detention but I have never written in an OB only signed. But it could be because I am not a member of SAPS
Amanga ezinja zama Poyisa bafwethu
Sibanda shem still need fame
Cannot remember food he was given but remembers the keys cells mattress.
Cannot remember if Engen had a shop from inside a Fortuner
Don't know English but able to read Alberton and pronounce well.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with questions, this is prosecution not pampering.
all this 5 accused are guilty they must just say who sent them that's it
What a difficult case
Ntanzi uyabuliswa bandla, can we have some intervention from the lawyers???
Ntanzi is contradicting himself with documents he signed😢
He is not the prosecutor is trying to make a case without actually facts Ntanzi hasn't changed his story papalakhe is trying to trick Ntanzi with sequence of events to make an impression that Ntanzi's testimony is fabricated, he was indeed tortured & assaulted if they didn't he wouldn't be in the dock today he was not offered tea & cakes to confess cumon wake up
4:32:00 Not truth, where is the defense??
The left Police station to Court; from Court via Alberton to Soweto and from Soweto to Rustenburg.
The Defense do your job bathong....
Sibanda is confusing himself
He is and he thinks he's being clear
No Ryder andivumi...12/2/2024
Sibanda is useless
Some of his questions are not clear, n he put a blame to them, anyway even I always blame someone
Yes. Some of Sibande's questions are ambiguous or not too particular, leaving the witness confused.
Seningameni nikhulume nje.....lomfana washaywa looo...uyamuzwa nangendlela aphendula ngayo....noma state sizama kanganani kumgcindezela
When he's saying "iphutha" he means it's a lie not mistake
Ubaloyi ni Sibande they know very well who killed senzi.
They making us fools nje
Bayasinyela laba bowu lokhe bebuza into engekho
Bayangicika
This is so painful
I knew it,Sibande was lying.Mngomezulu said what Ntanzi said.He was slapped in th face by Mabena on the 16th
& Mabena said to him; " you think you a smart " in Zulu... let's hope My Lord noted that
00
@@KennyG2435
Yes but that was not the question don’t think with emotions , look at reality ; in court language is important no assumptions, you tell it as it is
@@KennyG2435cruel cruel Mabena did such a horrible thing 2 another human being
@@sushelarajkumar367Mabena did that to a murderer.
The interpreter is not interpreting correctly, KZN Zulu vs. Gauteng Zulu, it's a cocktail for disaster.
U know even KZN Zulu differ slightly,cos there is Durban,PMBurg,Then Gauteng and then Nongoma and the neighborhood towns.Nongoma is too deep
You're right
You're right. Alot of things are lost in translation here.
Ntanzi is lucky for not facing the great Baloyi.
Not the great Baloyi but the corrupt Baloyi 😂
This has nothing to do with being great is about the truth weather Baloyi or whoever branzino is consistent with his story....
Sibanda is making me sick
Not like me
Sibande purposefully moves from one topic to another and the randomly bounces back to the same topics. This is a typical tactic used when the advocate is of the opinion that the witness is sticking religiously to a prepared narrative as opposed to telling the truth. The defence and the judge will recognise the tactic and allow it. That is the reason why there is not much objections from the defence and the judge.
Isizulu sikatolika asishayi khona. Bekumele ethi kuNtanzi "Ngenkathi uMabhena ethi, senzeni ngalomuntu?" wena wafikelwa emuphi umncabango?
Exactly akatoliki correct
Justice for Ntanzi
This Sibande think he is excelling in questioning Ntanzi, this young man was under crucification yhoo😮
The asault at the 'garbage dumping site' vs AVL showing no stoppage will need to be addressed by the defence. Especially since the judge is of the opinion that there is no 'garbage dumping site' in the area.
Sibande is grilling the accused , defence and the fans 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Hamba naye Sibande
Kelly's gang 😅😅😅
Sibande is not getting anywhere, wasting time and purposely not being clear, thanks to Mnisi for pointing it out "until Jesus comes"
@@somilangaye9465 I think he’s been able to show that Ntanzi is not a credible witness based on two things, 1. His version changes depending on the facts put to him e.g AVL, 2. His version cannot be verified by any other evidence or witness, not even his own words which are not reliable because he tends to forget crucial details.
Udom ayikho yonke lento oyikhulumayo actually Ntanzi is mopping the floor with sibande
Your Sibanda line of questioning is like that of a student in practice
Where are these guys lawyers😢😢😢
I think Mr sibiya must learn to this guy of what you should do when you defend yourself
Instead of selling out your lawyer 😅
Couldn’t agree more. Giving benefit of the doubt maybe it was just a strategy
Uzomuzwa kanjani uNtanzi omuntu ongale ,uyasangana wena nxaaaa izinqe
Uze uhwaqe nje uhlushwe yini kangaka ngecala elingamanga uzwa kanjani isilima kuyangidida Sibanda ndini
Listening to Ntanzi,somewhere he is contradicting himself and sort of denying what Mr Mngomezulu said because mostly the defence says what it's told by the accused
What would you say if someone asked you one thing from left, right, up and down
@@mthethelelipremierleague8704 I'm talking about when he says he can't comment on what Mngomezulu said
Mgumezulu had his way of attacking state as an advocate (u dnt go straight, u apply tricks)
Ntanzi is straight n forward. He is ryt to say he will not comment on Mngumezulu's version
@@bigdala365bw4Mngo may use his trick and tactics, but the versions of Mngo and Nthanzi should not contridict each other. The judge now needs to decide who is telling truth between Mngo, Nthanzi and the prosecution. Normally, the judge needs to simply decide between the defence and the prosecution, not three parties.
This man is repeating him self and the judge is not saying anything about it
Ungathi udla ò fish kuphela uSiband ngisho esebumba umlomo ungathi uNkosikazi
Nonsense questions Sibanda
All long i thought Sibanda was educated.
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
What is surprising is that a garage is a busy place. Do u think the police would so dumb to assault someone in a busy place?
It was during covid
Did they assault him at the garage?
@@sphesihlengema8434COVID or not the garage still operates and it can only operate when clients come through so yes it's busy
It's was during lock down
in this part of evidence the state wants to prove that, the 1st and 2nd accused were not
1. Intimidated,
2. Tortured,
3. Abused, and
4. Coerced to sign documents.
That the accused made a "confessions"
a. Volunteery, and
b. Without being assaulted.
According to my little knowledge, the state has dismally failed so far to dispute the fact that, accused persons were not beaten up by the police. That's why the state has brought so many witnesses to explain processes at police stations, that were never being followed. It is a well known facts that police always do something else and when being asked about it they'll ran to protocols and standard procedures. We all know that
Am not legal expert,but I can do better than this Sibanda.
Sibanda is using this opportunity to record Nthanzi's newly revised version. Sibiya is asking questions from all angles so that Ntanzi and the defence have very little room to further change their version in the mail trial. Remember that the prosecution will still be bringing more witnesses and evidence in the main trail.
Imisangano le kaSibanda
Weee u Sibanda 🙄🙄🙄 unganekwane
When he says let us proceed..ngath ngamclappa
Amehlo aBaloyi😥
Aye sabeka amehlo we black mamba
Really you are wicked
That you can cry 😭 and whip in court doesn’t mean you’re innocent…. What if the accused is pretending or regretting his actions
That "What if" got some weight.
Uma nifika eAlberton wawusasemotweni iFortuner yebo noma cha!only
Ntanzi is very respectful he still called Gininda "Babu Gininda"
I would also call him that if I wanted a not guilty verdict.
I think sibanda is still in school cause is forcing things
It’s difficult defending a seasoned criminal
💯
Yaa, but this guy this was his first time to be arrested, so we can't call him a seasoned criminal
A seasoned criminal with no criminal records or cases
Has He been convicted for any crime??
@@YTL-hi5llhe has not been. He's never been arrested until now.
I hope the court understands that saying "iphutha"is the way of showing respect infact ntanzi is supposed to say "amanga"
4:30:19 Sibanda your not telling the truth; on the way to Soweto not Rustenburg.
Some how I am buying Ntanzi's story, I think he is being framed 😮
The merits and demerits of the evidence from Mr Ntanzi and from the prosecution will be weighed by the judge before it comes to the decision but it looks like the writing is on the wall...12/2/2024
Then tell us what's written on the wall.
Not Guilty on all charges...(that's the writing on the wall) 13/2/2024...
The defence juxtaposed the dates of the assault and the confession. The 18th vs 19th. They somersaulted when they received the AVL document. But, there is still the issue of whether the assault happened by day or by night. Nthanzi is not able to explain the discrepancy.
No this interpretor is misleading the court cz he is not saying word by word what Mr Ntanzi is saying👀
The interpretor is faling the witness to answer the questions....the interpretor interpret wrongly.
So true and no one is interjecting,I wish Mshololo was not angry with the Rathacos she knows Zulu well
True, I am not Zulu but the little I can hear; He is failing big time
The accused says, emini. The translator say, afternoon.
Now the prosecutor latches on afternoon and finds fault with the accused
I dont see Ntanzi winning this one because if he can't answer what his lawyer was asking the witnesses then it means Mngomezulu's questions won't be taken seriously
Uyitye yonke Mntungwa.12/2/2024
Ramos & Mngoz were suppose to object; especially element of time plus street names. Their client mentioned things, example Dumping place in Alberton; Gate with Orlando; unused ATMs and rectifying the State when the wrong version or record is put.
The evidence led by the state was the car left Moroka (Mabena forget the key) and went to Vorslorus Court and from the court via Alberton to Moroka and from Moroka to Rustenburg.
Why keep on asking about time hence ntsnzi tells the court dat he never have a watch he is not familiar with Gauteng but keep on asking about buildig weak evidence from the state
So that when new evidence or withnesses are introduced in the main trial, Nthanzi will not be able to suddenly remember the time and duration in the main trial when it suits Nthanzi's version or movements.
These are all necessary questions to the Mr. Ntanzi, because you need to know when and where and if these assaults did take place. For example, they collected me from Tembisa Police Station and then took me to a certain place where they then assaulted and tortured me. All of these actions do have a time frame that needed to be compared to the vehicle tracking systems of the vehicle used. Assault and tortured do not take 5 min of that I am certain.
Prosecutors nibabi yhooooo. Ngathi namadumbe izideku..
I thought baloyi was ugly but after seeing sibande,I rest😂😂😂😂
Lokhu kuka crocodile mouth sekukubi kakhulu
Eyi sibande unesicefe nembuzo ebhedayo sikhuluma ngokufa komuntu ukudla kuhlanganaphi musa ukuthatha amapoint
Exactly ..that's my thinking. Also...uyabheda..lo elokhu ezenza into e serious. Elokhu ehlina ..
So many lies
Yes
What is this case about?
Shaya ngesintu nkabi
I honestly think the judge is bullying Mshololo in the court room. We used get an amazing energy as a country from Msho but lately when even she objects the judge is fighting her 🤔🤔
Mshololo was also bullying witnesses and shouting at them
your Mshololo is a bully herself it serves her right
Yazi ledidi liyanginyanyisa lomashwashwatha Lona
And what was adv Sibande supposed to ask cos his proving beyond doubt that the said accused was not assaulted
The judge will not have a. very difficult job/task in deciding which version to believe between the 02 ...Policemen, Magistrate, interpret, AVL expert and Mr B.S. Ntanzi ...12/2/2024
Unless the defence team have something up their sleeve. I can't think of anything.
This Sibanda guys has no respect and he is very rude Yho , ngathi ndingambetha
But the version that at some stage in Carltonville Sibanye mine Mogane, Mabhena and Accused No2 went to the Mine (Medic) Hospital....the inly place they visited (at least on the evidence adfuced) is HR Building to see as ti whether the fellow was at work or not ..this version is "New" possibly Adv Sibande will pick it up. Correct me guys if m wrong..12/2/2024
Yes. The mine hospital is part is a new version, I think even for the defence team. Had Nthanzi told his advocates, they would have asked him to omit the part where he gives concent for the SAPS to obtain his medical records.
Umtoliki cha akakwazi ukubeka njengoba esho uNtazi.
I am Zulu from KZN and he is really not interpreting correctly,this is a Nongoma Zulu boy not a Durban/Soweto Zulu
we should not forget that kininda in his own words said that him "himself" and the AVL expert "both" have worked on the AVL report before it was to be brought to court, in order to give the state the "dates and routes" that has been requested
Now it is an obvious thing that, the report was worked on by the master mind "kininda" himself, to suit a particular narrative 🤦🏿
It was cooked especially on the benoni police workshop story where it was allegedly booked for repairs meanwhile jonathan has corroborated ntanzi's version that the car was used on the 24th which confirms that indeed it was never faulty n no mechanic was called during the night the car was purpoted to be faulty
@@PeterSerwanyaMalebane
Absolutely 💯 state vehicles are not fixed by unauthorized roadside assistance
Kwaze kabuhlungu
The suspect can't chose for the Police to who drives the Car
Sibanda has enger issues he's not right according to talk to peoples, what i noticed he want Ntanzi to accept what he don't know. he's failing in other way.
Did they adjourn for today?
Yes
But Adv Sibande should not be too tactical with the witness he must be factual...12/2/2024
The tactic is designed to confuse Nthanzi so that it becomes difficult for Nthanzi to stick religiously to his narrative. Nthanzi seems to be aware of that, so it is not having the desired effect. When Nthanzi is unsure, Nthanzi gives a vague answer or pledges confusion.
I feel sorry for Ntanzi uzwakala njengomuntu ohloniphayo wahlangana nabafana aba wrong
Ibaphi abafana ahlangana nabo? Aba-wrong? Bahlangana ngani or ikuphi okubi uNtanzi ahlangana ngabo nabo
@@pholobiancompound question. 😂 Let me park here and wait for the answer.
Watever people might say this judge is not stupid,this Ntazi guy he have nothing to do with this case....Ballistic expect says it all unless mina ngilandela Icela elihlukile
Inkabi Vele iyadabukisa Uma sibanjiwe
@@pholobian wahlangana nenkabi zangakubo zamfaka emshikashikeni wobunkabi next question