ALL of the Laws Broken in CHRISTMAS VACATION

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 2.8K

  • @LegalEagle
    @LegalEagle  3 ปีที่แล้ว +178

    👮‍♂️Should Clark go to jail?
    🚀 LIMITED: Get CuriosityStream AND Nebula for 41% OFF! curiositystream.com/legaleagle

    • @LegalEagle
      @LegalEagle  3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      This was a fun video. Though it does confirm my suspicion that Chevy Chase's only good character was in Caddyshack.

    • @TurtleChad1
      @TurtleChad1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      A Turtle does think Clark should go to jail.

    • @Jack_OutsideTheBox
      @Jack_OutsideTheBox 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes

    • @infallibleblue
      @infallibleblue 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Nah, don’t let the HOA win. They’re the real criminals against holidays! Love ya!

    • @florentinrovira6380
      @florentinrovira6380 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      do a legal episode on community trial or black clover anime trial

  • @jdatlas4668
    @jdatlas4668 3 ปีที่แล้ว +936

    Laws Broken is hands down my favourite format on the channel and I'm so happy to see another episode.

    • @jonathanratsey2244
      @jonathanratsey2244 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I love Laws Broken its cool to look at the movies in a different light

    • @MorganBF1
      @MorganBF1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Nice profile photo 😇

    • @c.k.677
      @c.k.677 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Bi pride!!!

    • @jdatlas4668
      @jdatlas4668 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@c.k.677 I have to admit these kinds of reactions are entirely off topic but I also absolutely love the fact that pretty much everyone who actually recognises the flag reacts positively, and it's a really nice feeling getting responses like this.

    • @SuperSailorOutlawGeorgeIshaq
      @SuperSailorOutlawGeorgeIshaq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I love the Laws Broken format as well, even though I'm a Police Detective

  • @stevefyfe1018
    @stevefyfe1018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +481

    I appreciate the purity of leaving Eddie's "shitter was full!" line unedited in the midst of diligently censoring every other obscenity in this video.

    • @DoctorX17
      @DoctorX17 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Guess it didn’t count as a curse since it was referring to a toilet, lol

  • @zjc92
    @zjc92 3 ปีที่แล้ว +700

    Objection: The ice that breaks the window also smashes the stereo, which would most definitely exceed $500 worth of damage.

    • @XenobiaWinterWolfMoon
      @XenobiaWinterWolfMoon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      Not to mention the wet carpet

    • @zjc92
      @zjc92 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      @@rjz2 I was HOPING someone would know the model to confirm. Bless.

    • @리주민
      @리주민 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@rjz2
      Very precise. I just recognised it as an ancient device used for playing music.

    • @CAP198462
      @CAP198462 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      SUSTAINED!
      Would the prosecution explain why Mr Griswold not being charged with a felony?

    • @stephendonovan9084
      @stephendonovan9084 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CAP198462 Something’s wrong here, I can feel it

  • @CyRanger
    @CyRanger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +264

    It wasn't a "piece of gutter", that went through the neighbors' window.
    The gutter had obviously been clogged, with standing water that froze. When the gutter broke loose at the end, the channel of ice slid out and went through the window.
    The end result lead the neighbors to wonder not only about how their electronics were damaged, but why there was water everywhere (the ice channel busted everything, and subsequently melted.)
    Peace

    • @dutchtreat9
      @dutchtreat9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      THANK YOU. I wanted to reach through the screen and correct LE

    • @tharivol123
      @tharivol123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Why is the floor wet, Todd?

    • @ElectroDFW
      @ElectroDFW 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@tharivol123 "I don't know, MarGO!"

    • @davesolarz3364
      @davesolarz3364 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      And with the damage to the electronics, it would exceed the $500 threshold.

    • @robertvirginiabeach
      @robertvirginiabeach ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I'm thinking the gutter ice breaking the window and stereo was an accident, so subject to civil damages, but not criminal. Unless the tree was growing in the neighbor's yard same for that broken window.
      Eddie's dog, so not Clark's offence. She wasn't bleeding, I'm thinking she was just bowled over by the dog that was focused on chasing the squirrel.
      It's just a movie! Things get exaggerated. Between the breakers in Clark's power panel and the power company's breakers Clark would never be able to draw enough current to cause a blackout by himself or make additional generation necessary. Would have had to plug cords into outlets in multiple rooms to keep his own breakers from tripping.
      The cat chewed a power cord. Another accident, not animal cruelty. Current would be unlikely to flow through vital organs. Cat probably would have suffered a painful mouth burn. Another exaggeration.
      That was a power strip, not the home's load center. You can see it's adjacent to the side of a window in that clip.
      The waste tank was pretty much dumped by the time Clark even knew about it. Again, Eddie's offence, At worst Clark just didn't report it (might not have done any good on a holiday anyway)
      No sane person would think Clark was serious about wanting to kidnap his boss. Cousin Eddie is not a sane person. Probably should be in a V A hospital for service related disability.

  • @dr00ku
    @dr00ku 3 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    Re: Randy Quaid being crazier than his character
    I have a theory that Randy Quaid was never cast in Independence Day, he just wondered on set and fully believed there was an alien invasion.

  • @year_month_day
    @year_month_day 3 ปีที่แล้ว +104

    “Once Cousin Eddie comes to town, the pace of serious crimes escalates...”
    My god that was beautiful

    • @shaymorcormick8743
      @shaymorcormick8743 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      We all have that one family member

    • @AmaraJordanMusic
      @AmaraJordanMusic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Shay Morcormick Yep.

    • @ripperthesmilingindoraptor
      @ripperthesmilingindoraptor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In my case it's that one friend. He loves throwing gas tanks. I'm pretty sure he's technically a terrorist, but they can't arrest a 50 foot Indominus

  • @daverose2958
    @daverose2958 3 ปีที่แล้ว +437

    You’ve ruined nothing. This movie has only gotten better with your laws broken 😂

    • @thunderflare59
      @thunderflare59 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      We already knew they were breaking the law.

    • @AsiaDanceScene
      @AsiaDanceScene 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Does anyone really watch this movie and think for a second that Griswold is a law-abiding normal person?!?

  • @ElPayasoMalo
    @ElPayasoMalo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +165

    I like how everyone from this movie all look like they are billions of years old except Julia Louise-Dreyfus who barely looks five years older than she did in 1989.

    • @BradyPostma
      @BradyPostma 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Being on Veep prevents aging. It's a proven fact.

    • @pwoolcoc
      @pwoolcoc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Being filthy rich prevents aging. It's a proven fact.

    • @quothetheraven79
      @quothetheraven79 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Beverly DeAngelo has aged well

    • @BradyPostma
      @BradyPostma 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Making up garbage prevents aging. It's been well-tested on the internet.

    • @paleposter
      @paleposter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I prevent aging. Give my money

  • @slamg4618
    @slamg4618 3 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    13:32
    OBJECTION!
    Aunt Bethany’s lawyer could plead insanity to the charges since any jury could see that she is obviously senile and not responsible for her actions of animal cruelty.

    • @joemccarthy5508
      @joemccarthy5508 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Objection sustained.

    • @pz20jacobcouttsrogue
      @pz20jacobcouttsrogue 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Objection accepted

    • @joemccarthy5508
      @joemccarthy5508 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pz20jacobcouttsrogue It' sustained, not accepted.

    • @brianwhiteman7268
      @brianwhiteman7268 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Also, the cat was inadvertently electrocuted when Clark plugged the lights back in. So, there would be no charge. Clark also didn't tell Eddie to kidnap his boss. He was mad that he didn't get a bonus and went on a rant.

    • @monkeycat48
      @monkeycat48 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't think legal eagle thought this through. There's no way in hell a jury is going to convict a senile old woman for accidentally wrapping up her cat. Actually worked at the veterans home in Boulder City. There is this old US Marine from the world war II era and the first thing he tried to do was annoy the parrot. He was completely senile the nurses had to get up and literally move him

  • @katherinezimmerman6997
    @katherinezimmerman6997 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Objection: Die Hard takes place on Christmas Eve. Therefore Die Hard is an *Advent* movie.

    • @AAZ-yu5ss
      @AAZ-yu5ss ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Actually, Die Hard is a Metroidvania movie, revolutionary for it’s time in fact!

    • @godofmediocrity7582
      @godofmediocrity7582 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The first strand type movie

  • @groundbreaker91
    @groundbreaker91 3 ปีที่แล้ว +172

    "Are we going to charge this old man with criminal mischief? Yes. Yes we are." I don't know why, but you had me rolling right me XD

    • @blakexu4943
      @blakexu4943 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Justice is blind and heartless. It is the way.

    • @Rune3100
      @Rune3100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Same, i dunno why but that line and delivery really got me

    • @blakexu4943
      @blakexu4943 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Rune3100 it may be a misdemeanor but by adding mischief to the title makes it sound like they are being charged with trickery.

    • @04beni04
      @04beni04 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I literally just had to pause the video because that line has me laughing so hard I'm missing parts. _Deep breath_ Okay, back to it!

  • @SuperLordPedro
    @SuperLordPedro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    Objection! Merry Christmas.

    • @LegalEagle
      @LegalEagle  3 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      Sustained.

    • @oblivious8868
      @oblivious8868 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Addendum: Happy Hanukkah!

    • @ethanmartin82
      @ethanmartin82 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Addendum: Happy New Year!

    • @리주민
      @리주민 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Merry Christmas, merry Christmas, kiss my 🍑, kiss his 🍑, happy Hanukkah 😋

    • @Snowshowslow
      @Snowshowslow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Overruled ~ 2020

  • @KnowingBetter
    @KnowingBetter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +881

    If stink bombs or offensive smelling materials are illegal, I wonder if Mark Rober could get in trouble for his bait-boxes... 🤔
    (Not that I want him to, but I just watched that, so it's on my mind.)

    • @colescheller4439
      @colescheller4439 3 ปีที่แล้ว +139

      Between him saying he worked with law enforcement and how big those have gotten I think he would've gotten in trouble by now if it were

    • @SlocumJoe7740
      @SlocumJoe7740 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      Or Rudy Giuliani during Michigan voter fraud hearing

    • @AnthonyHarrisTechrat
      @AnthonyHarrisTechrat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +110

      I don't think so, the porch pirates are the ones placing the device designed to emit the smells in their own homes, and then activating the device.

    • @coriespringer9785
      @coriespringer9785 3 ปีที่แล้ว +115

      The only problem is, who is dumb enough to turn him in? You would be admitting that you trespassed and committed larceny in the off chance that the police would enforce this law, which it is a stretch since it dissipates so quickly

    • @CaptainApathetic
      @CaptainApathetic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      I don't think it would be illegal since the property owner was the one to place the trap

  • @akaimizu1
    @akaimizu1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    Objection: Clark Griswald was never specifically a *good* guy. He is the protagonist, but that's about it. From National Lampoon's Vacaction, he's already established as a person who slow burns off the deep end and is very willing to break all kinds of laws to *ahem* give his family the perfect experience, he could dream of, for them. We're talking about a guy who, before this movie even started, is already guilty of taking a hostage (first degree), and threatening that security guard under the pretense of keeping a loaded weapon trained on him, among other infractions that may be just as bad.

    • @Patricio4Christ
      @Patricio4Christ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It makes sense that just because the person is a protagonist, he isn't necessarily a good guy.

    • @WednesdayAddamsMW
      @WednesdayAddamsMW 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Clark Griswold would better fit the Villain Protagonist archetype.

    • @ripperthesmilingindoraptor
      @ripperthesmilingindoraptor 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Patricio4Christ Sounds like the little fuckers who had me impaled. I'll get those skulls even if it takes me the rest of my life. And I just wanted to see if Masie was OK. Did Owen actually think I was gonna eat her?

    • @danielbishop1863
      @danielbishop1863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Plus animal cruelty (albeit accidental).
      And improper disposal of a dead body.
      And stealing cash from a register.

    • @BrianTXtreme
      @BrianTXtreme 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not to mention adultery (I know it's technically not a crime but it still doesn't make him look good)

  • @moonlghtknght
    @moonlghtknght 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Hey Legal Eagle, I just popped on the live action Grinch movie with Jim Carrey and it occurred to me this would be a GREAT movie to do "laws broken" on. Would love to see that in the future!

  • @AzhreiVep
    @AzhreiVep 3 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    "The Griswold home is basically a walking fire hazard." - the Griswolds are secretly Baba Yagas, confirmed.

  • @N_Moli
    @N_Moli 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    "Are we going to charge this old man with criminal mischief?"
    *Yes*
    *Yes we are*

  • @Gaminating
    @Gaminating 3 ปีที่แล้ว +233

    Sorry to keep asking this, but I’d love to see a Laws Broken: The Simpson’s Movie.

    • @LegalEagle
      @LegalEagle  3 ปีที่แล้ว +201

      I'll add it to the list.

    • @galactic85
      @galactic85 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      Lol seeing him break down the legality of the giant dome alone would be amazing to watch.

    • @J0SHUAKANE
      @J0SHUAKANE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@galactic85 trapped in a dome, with more freedom than we have🤔

    • @thomashinks5545
      @thomashinks5545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Any chance you can add Matilda to the list? 😊

    • @TAILSORANGEs
      @TAILSORANGEs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LegalEagle did you put silicon into the iron apple????

  • @brenyatta
    @brenyatta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    There is something I do wanna touch upon, in regards to Frank Shirley cutting out the Christmas Bonus Program, during the events of the movie. I’m not super knowledgeable about law, but I feel like a boss/superior cutting an established pay-system, without letting his employees know about it has some sort of legal ramifications.

  • @paulmoore5392
    @paulmoore5392 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Funnily enough, Clark even mentions in the film that Cousin Eddy dumping into the city sewer system is illegal.

  • @jmglor
    @jmglor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    Ellen: "It's our family's first kidnapping"
    John Candy from Vacation has entered the chat.

    • @stevefyfe1018
      @stevefyfe1018 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      In all fairness, the original Vacation is chronologically later on than Christmas Vacation

    • @thomashajicek2747
      @thomashajicek2747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He was technically a hostage.

    • @blankname6629
      @blankname6629 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@stevefyfe1018 I think you might be right his kids look older in vacation

    • @inquisitiveterrestrian
      @inquisitiveterrestrian 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@blankname6629 I think the kids fully change in every movie, as the age difference between them changes.

    • @nunureds837
      @nunureds837 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@inquisitiveterrestrian you are correct, the kids change every movie and it is joked about within the movies lol

  • @Rekizence
    @Rekizence 3 ปีที่แล้ว +253

    "Cats are above the law."-Legal Eagle 2020

    • @Foolish188
      @Foolish188 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      They pretty much are in Common Law. If your dog, horse or pig damages someone's property, you are liable. But not cats.

    • @Rekizence
      @Rekizence 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@Foolish188 Yes, cats can do what ever they want

    • @KumaoftheForest
      @KumaoftheForest 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’ll use this in court

    • @nigdyezemska2827
      @nigdyezemska2827 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This confirms the ancient Egyptian theory that cats are in fact Gods.

    • @wesleyoldham-cartoonsandtv1962
      @wesleyoldham-cartoonsandtv1962 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      "Thunder thunder thunder! Thundercats are above the law!"
      -Lion-O

  • @techwiz81
    @techwiz81 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    OBJECTION: Clark was clearly just blowing off steam when he said he wanted his boss kidnapped, he can’t be held liable for Eddie’s actions

    • @lach888c2
      @lach888c2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      But he stupidly falsely confesses to the crime in front of the police.

    • @jenniferstine8567
      @jenniferstine8567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well if he was a mob boss saying he would like to see someone swimming with the fishes it's implied that it would please him if he swam with fish. Being stupid he probably would've booked a scuba diving trip. Assuming some brain activity occurred he'd weigh him down and throw him in a body of water.

    • @fredocarroll
      @fredocarroll 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@jenniferstine8567 The difference, though, is that a mob boss musing about people "swimming with the fishes" reasonably believes that someone will take him up on his musings and their nefarious intent. It would be pretty hard to argue that Clark should expect that his speech is "likely to incite or produce such action," if I'm correctly applying the test from Brandenburg v. Ohio.

    • @AmaraJordanMusic
      @AmaraJordanMusic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If he said to more people he could be accused of stochastic terrorism. Aka, you hint at something to enough people, the very low odds of one person taking you seriously and DOING IT rises, and it becomes likely someone WILL try it, based off of your offhand (or, sometimes, less than offhand, if it’s a dog whistle) comments.

    • @WednesdayAddamsMW
      @WednesdayAddamsMW 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Clark actually can be convicted for solicitation to commit a felony.

  • @wpl955g9
    @wpl955g9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    FLETCH: What's the charge?
    SHERIFF: Pissing me off.
    FLETCH: Is that a felony or a misdemeanor?

    • @searchingfororion
      @searchingfororion 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the U.S? Typically a death sentence.

  • @kippert8912
    @kippert8912 3 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    "The Griswold home is essentially a walking fire hazard"
    "Essentially a walking fire hazard"
    "Walking fire hazard"
    Walking house

    • @TheAweDude1
      @TheAweDude1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What, you never seen the simpsons?

    • @ripperthesmilingindoraptor
      @ripperthesmilingindoraptor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Walking fire hazard sounds like Indy the Indominus' little brother Opsin. He loves throwing gas tanks.

  • @TobeyFairre7861
    @TobeyFairre7861 3 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    "The Darker Side of Clark Griswold" is going to be my Holiday Metal band's name

    • @pete_lind
      @pete_lind 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Make sure first Clark Griswold is not a copyrighted name , like Swedish band Avalanche had to change its name and is since 2009 called , Amaranthe .
      Finnish band , Nightwish , has a song called Amaranth published 2007 , so bet they had to ask them before getting rights to use their current name .
      In this case there is no big problem , when you see these both bands lot in same concerts and vocalists are singing with each other Christmas carols , sadly not this Xmas .

    • @shep9231
      @shep9231 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I want a copy of your first song mate :)

  • @temporalTechnologist
    @temporalTechnologist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    You should definitely do a Laws Broken: 9 to 5! It stars Dolly Parton and it's a office comedy about women in the workplace, and it's got all them office 'laws broken' you'd be looking for!
    I would love to see you do an examination of that movie!

  • @piemonster9778
    @piemonster9778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Haha he said “you AITA” instead of “you ATA”
    Oh...i guess i really ATA

    • @availanila
      @availanila 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I thought he used it as a verb, i.e. you lurk and post there.
      But this is truly funnier.

    • @alvarorey9308
      @alvarorey9308 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      YTA

    • @katyungodly
      @katyungodly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I noticed that. He essentially said “you am I the asshole” when he meant “you are the asshole” lol

  • @StanSwan
    @StanSwan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a Master Electrician a power strip is not an electrical service panel. Most residential homes have a 100 or 200 amp service. Clark is plugging all his lights into a 120 volt outlet in his garage that is most cases on a 15 amp circuit. So the fuse or breaker would trip with more than 1800 watts on it. He is using c-9 lights that are 9 watts each, so his limit is 200 bulbs. This would not be a blip to the power company.
    To overload his 100 amp service he would need 2,667 bulbs or for a 200 amp service 5,333. Even this would not be a blip to the power company. The Nation Electrical Code is laws about who and how buildings can be wired. Overloading a circuit(s) while unwise is not illegal. The fuse would blow or the breaker would trip if it was wired correctly and maintained.

  • @RobbieFitzgerald
    @RobbieFitzgerald 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The line about him changing his name to Pierce Hawthorne was brilliant.

  • @Joe1up
    @Joe1up 3 ปีที่แล้ว +110

    "Jelly of the Month Club" should be against the law.

    • @meowtherainbowx4163
      @meowtherainbowx4163 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Someone made it a real thing, too!

    • @brimeetsbooks
      @brimeetsbooks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But it’s the gift that keeps giving all year!

    • @TheKennethECarper
      @TheKennethECarper 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why you have to hate on jelly?

    • @jenniferstine8567
      @jenniferstine8567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheKennethECarper It leaves him in a jam.

    • @rfrolicarts
      @rfrolicarts 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      COVID-19 has created the first year during which "Jelly of the Month Club" actually seems like an appealing gift. I think subscription boxes are more popular now than they ever have been.

  • @frankr.ashbyjr.2006
    @frankr.ashbyjr.2006 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    What about “laws broken how the grinch stole Christmas” I’d LOVE to see that from the classic Boris Karloff version...that would be awesome

    • @thefaboo
      @thefaboo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeesss

    • @jenniferstine8567
      @jenniferstine8567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's one that would rack up charges! The Grinch probably won't live long though with hypocardiomyapia or heart cancer. The walls of the heart become too thick to pump blood. Which means he doesn't get the strength of 10 grinches plus 2. Law isn't the only thing that ruins movies. I think Cinema Sins did this movie. It would mostly be plot holes than law.

    • @Ed20942
      @Ed20942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Doesn’t matter that Grinch gave the presents back, either! Grinch, you still committed home invasion and burglary times every house you robbed.

  • @sarahbehringer5703
    @sarahbehringer5703 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Objection: couldn’t it it be argued that aunt Bethany isn’t of sound mind and therefore cannot be charged of any harm done to the cat?

    • @jwppowers
      @jwppowers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Statement: A psychological evaluation of the Aunt would have to be carried out in order to determine if that objection holds water.

    • @danielbishop1863
      @danielbishop1863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Plus, she had no knowledge that the cat was chewing on an electrical cord.

  • @blakdeth
    @blakdeth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Hmmmm. That Wrongful Tree Cutting Act specifies "cutting" a tree. He didn't cut that tree down though. He dug it up. He uprooted it. Totally different.

  • @TheCoal27
    @TheCoal27 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    "This is our family's first kidnapping."
    Probably not your last though.

    • @frocat5163
      @frocat5163 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I mean...not even their first kidnapping...

    • @bretsheeley4034
      @bretsheeley4034 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@frocat5163 Definitely not. They keep napping kids to replace their previous children from the last movie.

  • @brimeetsbooks
    @brimeetsbooks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    You get older, and you really start to relate to poor Margo and Todd.

    • @Clay3613
      @Clay3613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thinking your better than everyone else cause you have money?

    • @mfenn7325
      @mfenn7325 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Clay3613 They live in the same upper-middle class neighborhood. I think it’s because, aside from snide comments they made mostly in private, they don’t infringe on the Griswalds the way the Griswalds infringe on them

    • @Cypresssina
      @Cypresssina 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's kinda like as you get older, you relate more with the mom from The Santa Clause.

    • @groundbreaker91
      @groundbreaker91 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Tbh, as I've gotten older, I've related more with Clark lol

    • @brimeetsbooks
      @brimeetsbooks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Cypresssina Scott was the worst

  • @joebyrum9241
    @joebyrum9241 3 ปีที่แล้ว +249

    Objection: this was not their first kidnapping. They kidnapped two Walley World security guards while on vacation in 1983.

    • @KorGarrot
      @KorGarrot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Objection! The Walley World incident would be more of a hostage situation, not kidnapping.

    • @tigerspirit1917
      @tigerspirit1917 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@KorGarrot Objection! You're objection should have started "overruled"
      😏

    • @Eraera1
      @Eraera1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Objection: Clark kidnapped the wally world security guards. In Christmas vacation, cousin Eddie kidnapped the boss

    • @moonlghtknght
      @moonlghtknght 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Eraera1 Objection! Clark and the rest of the family were complicit once they didn't turn Eddie in for doing that. The only thing that MIGHT save them all is if the boss denies actually being kidnapped.

    • @jasonwolf6414
      @jasonwolf6414 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Judge Stella, could we get a ruling?

  • @tedralston9918
    @tedralston9918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +270

    OBJECTION!: Clark would be immune to litigation due to legal plot armor.

    • @justsomeoneelse5942
      @justsomeoneelse5942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      H O L Y

    • @thunderflare59
      @thunderflare59 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Or he could just run for office. That seems to work for a lot of people.

    • @alex0589
      @alex0589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's the christmas magic that bails you out

    • @galacticbob1
      @galacticbob1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I, for one, would watch the courtroom follow-up...
      National Lampoon's Christmas Litigation 🎄

    • @GannerRhysode
      @GannerRhysode 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@thunderflare59 well actually cousin Eddie would be the one who got elected and he would pardon Clark

  • @donaldsmith5801
    @donaldsmith5801 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The Christmas Tree scene was not illegal. The family went to one of those places where you can chop down your own tree.

  • @danielgerry6374
    @danielgerry6374 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Objection, when a device is plugged in to an outlet it falls outside of electrical code. And that power strip is no considered a service panel as it is a power strip. The only actual violation of ULL code their is the fact that is an indoor rated strip mounted outside

  • @AGoodBrentDogs
    @AGoodBrentDogs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Objection!: Clark never ordered Eddie to kidnap his boss. While he was ranting his wishes to the family, he never directly addressed Eddie nor ordered anyone to enact his wishes. Eddie acted autonomously to please his boss, er, Clark.

    • @tsherwoodrzero
      @tsherwoodrzero 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Objection Sustained. Clark is not responsible for the actions of another adult competent to stand trial for said actions.

    • @obarlao
      @obarlao 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ⁠@@tsherwoodrzeroEddie being competent to stand trial is debatable

    • @tsherwoodrzero
      @tsherwoodrzero 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@obarlao Trying to prove incompetence here is debatable at best. Here's why:
      Prosecutor: Mr (Eddie) Griswald, do you have a driver's license?
      Eddie: Yes
      Prosecutor: Can you present it to the court?
      Eddie: *does so*
      Prosecutor: A valid driver's license proves the defendant is deemed competent by a Government-sanctioned authority and is competent to stand trial.
      Or it can go like this:
      Prosecutor: Mr (Eddie) Griswald, do you have a driver's license?
      Eddie: No
      Prosecutor: Why is that? You know it is illegal to drive without a license, right? (a "dumb" question)
      Eddie: Yes I do.
      Prosecutor: How long have you been driving without a license?
      Eddie: 3 years? (answer doesn't really matter)
      Prosecutor: So you have chosen to drive for 3 years without a license?
      Eddie: Yes
      Prosecutor: This proves beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is competent to stand trial.
      Legal Eagle details why it works in his video about My Cousin Vinny.

  • @rhythmjones
    @rhythmjones 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Lol, Clark is not a "good guy" in any of the Vacation movies.

    • @JamesLatimer
      @JamesLatimer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      He lusts after another woman in pretty much every Vacation movie.

    • @Clay3613
      @Clay3613 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JamesLatimer It's a movie.

    • @JamesLatimer
      @JamesLatimer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Clay3613 You could have fooled me. I thought it was a play. Thank you for bringing it to my attention that this is in fact a movie.

    • @lilchapstick7022
      @lilchapstick7022 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Clay3613 it’s a what!

    • @RequiemPoete
      @RequiemPoete 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JamesLatimer Why do you have to make the holidays hooter than they already are?

  • @KayeHalliwell
    @KayeHalliwell 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Still have my finger’s crossed for Matilda

  • @benbratko9904
    @benbratko9904 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Objection: grandma had clearly demonstrable dementia which means she lacked any intent when wrapping the cat so she wouldn’t be arrested
    The grandfather did not know the sewer was full of gas when he lit the match, and was only intending to lite a cigar not cause an explosion so he lacked intent
    And Clark’s neighbors were married which means when she assaulted her husband it would be domestic battery

  • @ericthompson3982
    @ericthompson3982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I freaking ADORE the Pearce Hawthorne tie-in. Nicely done.

  • @chaos_ae
    @chaos_ae 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Objection! The boss and his wife said that they weren't going to press charges for the kidnapping.

    • @Highfalutinloyd
      @Highfalutinloyd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      A prosecutor could still decide to try to indict them though. Prosecutors don't need the victim's consent to press charges, but it helps if the victim is cooperative, I believe.

    • @TheArtistKnownAsNooblet
      @TheArtistKnownAsNooblet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      That doesn't really matter at all. The whole "I'm (not) pressing charges" thing is moistly just movie stuff, the state decides whether or not to criminally charge someone. Victim cooperation can influence whether a prosecutor sees the case as winnable but that's about the limit of their influence.

    • @vituperation
      @vituperation 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@TheArtistKnownAsNooblet All I got from that was "moistly"

    • @brye687
      @brye687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The other comments are right, if the prosecution decides to go forward with the charges, they can. However the "victim" can choose to support the accused, in court, which is not great for the prosecutions case.

  • @elimartin3982
    @elimartin3982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +196

    Objection: no one is talking about the fact that someone thought that the “Illinois Exotic Weed Act” would be the name for a serious law.

    • @drpibisback7680
      @drpibisback7680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      I mean, it is a serious law about conservation and preventing invasive species from taking root. It just also happens to have a name that sounds to a layman like it's about blazing pricey foreign kush. That's more on lawyers being very literal and, in many cases, no fun.

    • @rdumiak
      @rdumiak 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      SO I have no legal recourse if Clark wants to cut down buckthorn or hemlock for his holiday decorations from my property. I guess I'll just have to set some traps for trespassers (oooops that's another video they already did). But on a serious note, the word "exotic" (non-native) means a harmless plant that's been introduced from outside its native range ("invasive" plants are the ones that are harmful to the ecosystem).

    • @donaldhyattthe3rd524
      @donaldhyattthe3rd524 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not all weed is exotic. Only the best kinds are.

    • @commentsiguess1263
      @commentsiguess1263 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @davidstorrs
      @davidstorrs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      "Exotic Weed Act" would be an amazing band name.

  • @amandas2639
    @amandas2639 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    When are we gonna get "everything is illegal" merch?

    • @RabblesTheBinx
      @RabblesTheBinx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Never. It would be illegal.

    • @megmcc9608
      @megmcc9608 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Very good idea. Contact local tshirt making company

    • @Kittsuera
      @Kittsuera 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@megmcc9608 to have them commit an illegal act? oh shoot, even comments are illegal~

  • @vladyvhv9579
    @vladyvhv9579 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Note on gutter: It wasn't part of the gutter that flew off. It was a giant icicle that had formed inside the gutter. Hence why the neighbors were wondering why everything was wet when they got home.
    Kidnapping: Clark was just ranting, and didn't expect anyone to take him seriously. Additionally, when the cops heard why the boss was kidnapped, they wanted to beat the boss with rubber hoses.
    Tree cutting: They didn't cut the tree. They uprooted it.

  • @nala2624
    @nala2624 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just started watching your videos and while I am not a lawyer in any stretch of the word, I do live in Illinois and I love that you cover laws from Illinois.

  • @reginarodriguez1477
    @reginarodriguez1477 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    even when i saw this as a teenager i thought clark should go to jail lol

  • @tskmaster3837
    @tskmaster3837 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    OMG, something that's NOT about the death of Democracy, it;s a Chirstmas Vacation Miracle!

  • @Snoopy101a
    @Snoopy101a 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Objection: @2:35 you state that it was "a piece of gutter" when in fact it was water that had become frozen in the gutter.

  • @iikittyplayz841
    @iikittyplayz841 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    OBJECTION! The boss said he was not pressing charges. 10:55

    • @monkeycat48
      @monkeycat48 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sustained considering the fact that Clark had nothing to do with his own bosses kidnapping. Plus it wasn't even Clark's idea in the first place it was his cousin

  • @erin8325
    @erin8325 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Objection: It wasn't a piece of gutter that broke the window of Todd's-it was a huge piece of ice that collected and froze in the gutter. And not only did it break the window, but it also broke their stereo equipment (lucky he didn't start a fire when that happened) and then as she complained in the movie-Margo asks Todd why the carpet was all wet; which okay, it would have been melted water from the icicle-and that isn't necessarily damages. But they could have claimed it as such, since most people who hate their neighbors (and obviously they don't like Clark one bit)-probably would have gone as far as to say the carpet was damaged, even though clearly, a bit of wetness can't damage the carpet; unless it caused a mildew/mold issue.

  • @inura25
    @inura25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    "Die Hard is....a Christmas song" the art of subversion lol

  • @jima1135
    @jima1135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    OBJECTION: He clearly did not CUT the tree down. He dug it up by the roots. This law does not apply.

    • @VCBird6
      @VCBird6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He DID cut down his neighbors' tree tho

    • @korivakvehiclesims3341
      @korivakvehiclesims3341 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There’s no “stumpage value” if there’s no stump!

  • @quothetheraven79
    @quothetheraven79 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Objection: Clark didn’t cut down the tree, he dug it up 😝

    • @jenniferstine8567
      @jenniferstine8567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I saw that too in the clip. He left a pretty big hole that means. Someone could easily break a leg now. Especially if it fills up with snow and/ or ice. That's if they don't crack their head open in the fall too.

    • @shmooveyea
      @shmooveyea 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I would say even on a tree farm or with a tree permit that tree far exceeds the height allowable. You can't take trees over x feet generally. Also there is no way hauling a 30ft tree on the wagon was legal, lol

    • @suebob16
      @suebob16 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Clark forgot to bring the chainsaw. If he had it with him, I'm sure he would have cut it down. His stubbornness led him to digging it out instead.

    • @rickhealey4231
      @rickhealey4231 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you trying to plea bargain down to grand theft? Because assuming that the tree was worth more than $10,000 (based on LegalEagle's estimation that triple the tree's value was in the neighborhood of $50k), that constitutes a Class 2 Felony Theft, which in another 3 years and $25k of fines. If it was under $10k, you just have a second count of a Class 3 Felony Theft, but regardless, it's not like he's getting off there.

  • @Real28
    @Real28 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I almost posted about the moving violations but you just covered it. Pretty sure driving under a truck is a pretty substantial offense.
    Loved this. Got quite a few good laughs.

  • @ExploreWithIsaac
    @ExploreWithIsaac 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is this what happens when a first year law student tries to tell us what is legal? First, it was ice and not a gutter that went through the window, and saying it was intentional would be a stretch. Most likely, that would be a simple insurance claim, possibly a civil case.

  • @nateds7326
    @nateds7326 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Hey if it's a wonderful life counts as a Christmas movie, than die hard definetly is. Their both crazy plots that use Christmas as a back drop, and the themes of the movie, getting back together with your family, is ultimately Christmas related even though they both really didn't have to be on Christmas.
    Oh yeah and the video was good.

    • @Gos1234567
      @Gos1234567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Die Hard Is definetly an Xmas movie.Actually it’s got more Christmassy stuff in it than IAWL

  • @JoshNieporte
    @JoshNieporte 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    You forgot the theft committed by Cousin Eddie, because he stole this movie every scene he was in.

    • @jellysharkbat
      @jellysharkbat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I feel like that sledding scene should be added in there too..there were cars on that highway, if I recall..

  • @wuphat
    @wuphat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    "Don't..."
    --Michael Scott

    • @MuttFitness
      @MuttFitness 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Don't..."
      -Micheal Scott
      -Wuphat
      -MuttFitness

  • @clarkjbunch
    @clarkjbunch 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    At 2:38 Mr. Lawyer states that a piece of gutter goes through the neighbor's window. That is not a piece of Clark's gutter. The gutter was full of ice which explains why Todd and Margo can't find anything that broke the window and smashed the stereo; makes me wonder if the lawyer watched and/or understood the movie. He then talks about Illinois statues involving knowingly and intentionally doing different things; it is unclear that Clark Griswold was aware that ice launched itself nextdoor as he was swinging from the gutter and fearing for his life at the time.

  • @McSmacks
    @McSmacks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As a point of order it wasn't the gutter that broke the stereo, it was ice from the gutter.

  • @GreenLuthor
    @GreenLuthor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I get the feeling that if you did a Laws Broken about the first Vacation, Clark's prison sentence would have precluded him from being out of prison by the time of Christmas Vacation...

  • @artman2oo3
    @artman2oo3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    You should definitely next do one of my other fav christmas movies... “Scrooged.” Please do that one. SO. MANY. FELONIES. LOL

    • @richardarriaga6271
      @richardarriaga6271 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Scrooged got Fox/Fox News down cold with gratuitious sexual content, violence, and sensationalism and greed. If only Rupert Murdoch got the treatment from those three ghosts.

  • @graysongarrick1638
    @graysongarrick1638 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    OBJECTION!: Wouldn’t Clark be off the hook for the kidnapping charges since later in the scene his boss clearly states that he has no intention of pressing charges?

    • @리주민
      @리주민 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Good question. Iirc the state/crown is able to charge even if victim chooses not to. Default crown/state being the victim (funnily enough) is murder. I still think the family should sue in the case of murder. Opinion: Its not a crime against the state, its a crime against the person.

    • @LangyMD
      @LangyMD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The victim deciding to "press charges", to a large degree, isn't a real thing. That's the (supposedly) impartial prosecutor's job.

    • @twitchascension
      @twitchascension 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      To counter what others have said, saying you refuse to press charges would imply intent to not issue statements or testify against the (alleged) perpetrator making prosecution difficult.
      However, as noted by the others, it is largely something done in fiction to wave away the consequences of actions the viewer knows would result in pretty serious charges.

    • @ahapka
      @ahapka 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The decision to charge is the prerogative of the state. They can charge regardless of what the victim wants.

  • @timothypochowski2836
    @timothypochowski2836 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    You should review the court scenes in "Grandma got run over by a Reindeer"

    • @o_o5210
      @o_o5210 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      YES!!!!

  • @MrSpartanicus
    @MrSpartanicus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    After watching all my childhood movies get lawyered one thing has become clear, if I ever need a lawyer, I’m calling Devin. 😆

  • @lunickiwrites7256
    @lunickiwrites7256 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    I've never been this early, but now I understand why people think it's noteworthy to say how early they are.

    • @Fomasy
      @Fomasy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Last time I was this early, peoples didn't question it.

  • @nate1066pollock
    @nate1066pollock 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    You need to do a follow-up video listing the crimes in National Lampoon's Vacation. Pretty sure Clark gets at least 30 years.

    • @michaelnally2841
      @michaelnally2841 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Off hand I know the car dealership guy who swindles Clark could face a lawsuit for damage to Clarks car(given Clark didn’t legally sign it away at the time)
      Clark himself off hand with charges could face theft, reckless driving, given an underage child alcohol, killing of an animal, kidnapping, threatening someone with a deadly weapon, and possibly manslaughter with Ellen’s Aunt. Yeah if found guilty of all that I think he’d be in jail for well over 30 years.

  • @jonmayer
    @jonmayer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Loophole: He never cut down the tree.

  • @KennethCochran
    @KennethCochran 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Objection: No reasonable person would misconstrue Clark's ranting about his boss as anything other than hyperbole. The kidnapping charge should apply solely to cousin Eddie, whom no one has ever accused of being reasonable.

    • @monkeycat48
      @monkeycat48 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’m not gonna lie, but this is the second TH-cam channel I have found where they have always punished Clark Griswold, despite the fact this was not his fault. I mean yeah he’s a silly guy who is a jinx in someways considering this is a comedy. but yeah, I feel like sentencing him along with many other stuff. Yeah that’s not right I don’t think legal Eagle watched the whole film or paid any close attention.

  • @JKiler1
    @JKiler1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There's no such thing as auxiliary nuclear power by the way. Nuclear power is not used for peak times; it doesn't go up and down with demand, as it can't react quickly in a safe manner. Nuclear plants operate at a steady output for long periods of time, and other plants on that grid go up and down.

  • @facepalmdaily4404
    @facepalmdaily4404 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    OBJECTION: They didn't kill the cat. The cat killed itself

    • @patriciaw636
      @patriciaw636 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah he bit on the wiring, yknow, like a dumbass cat

  • @chrisstick5403
    @chrisstick5403 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    Objection! Die Hard is most definitely a Christmas movie.

    • @FreemanicParacusia
      @FreemanicParacusia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You can make a christmas ornament of John McClaine in the air duct with cardboard, aluminum foil, and a printed screenshot from that scene.

    • @karlajaeger2082
      @karlajaeger2082 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FreemanicParacusia brilliant!

    • @slake9727
      @slake9727 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The writer and director both say it's a Christmas movie.

  • @Avresem
    @Avresem 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    You should totally do a Laws Broken for the true classic Christmas Movie: Die Hard. Edit: I totally left this comment before the video started XD

    • @61rampy65
      @61rampy65 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jwhite-1471 But then Christmas and New Year is over, and its back to the same old family rifts and struggles.

    • @ruthdeckman9781
      @ruthdeckman9781 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jwhite-1471 another reason Die Hard is a Christmas movie is that it takes place around Christmas.

  • @bennood2031
    @bennood2031 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey LegalEagle - the thing that the ice spear hit is called a beocenter (or another variant) - and even today costs about 4k. The damages well exceeded that limit 500$ limit EASILY at the time.

  • @edwardwonghaupepelutivrusky
    @edwardwonghaupepelutivrusky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Objection: It actually wasn't a piece of gutter that went through the window. It was ice that had frozen sitting in the gutter that shot out and through the window. That's why when the neighbors discover the damage they ask why it's all wet in there too (not sure the exact phrasing). There's no way he could have known there was a giant icicle in the gutter when it broke, which was clearly not intentional.

  • @SeijinDinger
    @SeijinDinger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    will watch when back from errands, but all I can say is "Shitters full"

  • @johnsmith1882-x2i
    @johnsmith1882-x2i 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    2:37 objection! it was not the gutter itself, it was a rod of ice flung out from the gutter. Thats why later Todd and Margo cant figure out what caused the damage and why the floor is so wet.

    • @melissacooper8724
      @melissacooper8724 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think they figured out that Clark was responsible when they looked toward his house.

  • @thebaccathatchews
    @thebaccathatchews 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for the silliness.
    And Die Hard is as much a Christmas movie as The Long Kiss Goodnight.

  • @doubledarefan
    @doubledarefan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Objection! That was not a gutter, that was a chunk of ice in the gutter that turned into a missile. In reality, said "missile" would have just fallen to the ground upon exiting the gutter. The fact that it flew far enough to break a window and smash an appliance is pretty good proof that physics were on their own Christmas Vacation.

  • @coletrain3162
    @coletrain3162 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The fact that Bruce Willis doesn't think die hard is a Christmas movie makes it more of a Christmas movie.

  • @FieldMarshalFry
    @FieldMarshalFry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    OBJECTION!
    A Muppets Christmas Carol is the best Christmas movie!

    • @longlivelinzi
      @longlivelinzi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It most certainly is! My sister and I use to watch it every year at Xmas

  • @TheHauntedDriveIn
    @TheHauntedDriveIn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Last time I was this early I scored a membership to the Jelly of the Month Club. Great video LegalEagle!

  • @ThisOldSkater
    @ThisOldSkater 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    4:17 That's not a service panel. That's a bunch of power strips.

  • @jwfelde
    @jwfelde 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Objection: While it may be worth that much aesthetically, stumpage is pretty much the value in timber. In New York this year, the price of a spruce (which is the kind of tree from the movie) was about $100 per thousand board feet. I’m not a forester, but I think optimistically you could get about 50 board feet out of that tree, so the stumpage would be $5.

  • @stevenwhitacre4680
    @stevenwhitacre4680 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Technical Objection: This is of course a comedic film, but Clark overloading the city power grid in that way is probably physically/technically impossible, especially without first blowing out his local residential transformer (maybe that's what caused the power outage for the McAllisters in Home Alone?) and possibly burning down his own house. Electrical grids, home mains and individual home circuits are only designed to handle so much current, and overcurrent past a certain point is likely to cause a fault of some kind, which might result in a fire, though in general circuit breakers should kick in and shut off before that point, which is part of their purpose. Overcurrent of a level to shut down the city power grid from a lack of current, might well trip and/or blow something in the residential substation for Clark's neighborhood or area.

  • @mossyproductions7451
    @mossyproductions7451 3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Let’s be honest. Chevy Chase isn’t that great of a person either

  • @thefourshowflip
    @thefourshowflip 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    One of my favourite “Christmas movies”...
    Trading Places with Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd.

    • @punkroxs
      @punkroxs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Now I want to see a laws broken segment on that movie

  • @richardp5920
    @richardp5920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Objection! Die Hard is a Christmas movie, because the Christmas season is critical to the movie’s plot.

    • @happycamperds9917
      @happycamperds9917 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You could make the same argument for Harry Potter, since some of the Christmas gifts have an effect on the plot.

    • @AdaptiveApeHybrid
      @AdaptiveApeHybrid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because the Christmas party? It could have just as easily been a birthday party

    • @hillkillr
      @hillkillr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AdaptiveApeHybrid You could say that about many Christmas movies though. Elf could have been about a birthday clown (intentionally stupid example).

    • @AdaptiveApeHybrid
      @AdaptiveApeHybrid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hillkillr the god father was a Christmas movie ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

    • @Quinntus79
      @Quinntus79 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Does that mean Child’s Play and Gremlins are Christmas movies?

  • @Brandon-lw1wx
    @Brandon-lw1wx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Clark didn’t tell Eddie to kidnap his boss. He just ranted and Eddie took him seriously.

  • @zdwade
    @zdwade 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This guys law knowledge is as deep as a puddle. Skips over the whole intent element. Also with the dog, Margo is on his property uninvited.

  • @chadc638
    @chadc638 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is one of my favorite movies ... and this video just made it SO much better lol I cant wait to watch it while this video is roaming around in my brain haha Thank you very much. Happy holidays folks :)

  • @leahd9999
    @leahd9999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "... Because everything is illegal." Beautiful, thank you.

  • @damianelswick8828
    @damianelswick8828 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I've actually never seen any of the vacation movies. When they've been covered on this channel is the extent of my knowledge of them.

  • @colinrohach2493
    @colinrohach2493 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Objection: you should have talked about police breaking down Todd and Margot's door. Police had no probable cause to enter her domicile and Margot's words to the cops did not give permission to break down the door.