Surprisingly it is! I've got more Al Bowlly on 78 with Roy Fox and band, but those records tend to be in very poor condition. I guess it's because they were more popular than obscure bands like Sid Phillips.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 Ha, yes that's very much a possibility, I've seen and heard many records that are in perfect condition, but in my experience, filthy, just because nobody liked the music on them when they were released, and they were forgotten about, tossed around, beat up a bit.. But after a good cleaning they shine, and in sound as well. Aside from mostly minor scratches, of course. Anyhow, how are those old shellac 73 RPM records? I deal with vinyl, 33 1/3 records and 45 rpm, so I really don't know much about 78s, and I only have a few of them, and they're not shellac I don't think.. Not to mention the only machine I have that plays 78 RPM records, is flimsy and seems cheap, and it's from the 70's. Doesn't have a needle currently. Although I have a diamond stylus I believe, somewhere.. But I am not sure what it's made for.
@@شعبة-ت6ط Hi, sorry for the late reply. I'd recommend buying a brand new modern turntable that can play 33 1/3, 45 & 78rpm records. It will probably set you back at least $300 so it's up to you. 78rpm records break easily and they should always be stored vertically up right. If you are easily bothered by surface noise, I'd recommend to only buy no less than VG copies and preferably NM or VG++. You're also going to need a stylus only meant for playing 78rpm records (bigger grooves).
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 Gotcha, $300 is not that much, I'm also involved in ham radio somewhat, and that is a REALLY expensive hobby as well.. But even more so, because something as simple as a portable, powerful antenna, can set you back a ton more than 300 dollars, easily! lol..
That is indeed the dream record of Mr Bowlly im surprised to see it play live on a turntable it's incredible! I hope to find a copy of that soon but it does sound really rare
I'm not too familiar with The Caretaker, but I do appreciate what I've heard so far. I've got a somewhat better sounding video of "Heartaches" on my channel, but feel free to sample literally anything from my channel. I've also just transferred this record with a newer 78rpm stylus, which I plan to upload to my channel as a reupload (in a slightly better quality).
Hi, could you upload a lossless transfer of this song and the runout groove somewhere? Would be cool to have it without TH-cam's nasty compression, and it would help with my pseudo-remaster project.
It would be compressed no matter where I would upload it on the internet (wireless bit-rated compression with servers in the cloud will do that). I think you meant the crappy recording of this video, with which I used my broken ass Samsung phone.
There's really no way to circumvent digital compression on the internet, obviously. I don't mean to sound like an ass, but there's just no way. If it's digitized, it's digitally compressed in some way from the very start.
If you want to play 78s on that turntable, you'll have to purchase a separate 78rpm needle (stylus) and set the tracking force to 4.5g and anti-skate to 4.5. If you want the best possible sound quality you'd also need to balance the tonearm to the platter, get the turntable leveled perfectly and ajust the azimuth.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 Could you please make a video with this same record however playing it at a slower tempo?? It would be greatly appreciated.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 Don’t worry about it, I just wanted to see if you played the record slowed down that it could sound like the caretakers “just a burning memory”
Thanks for posting this, it's amazing that you were able to get your hands on the original, physical version of this song. Great find!
That old shellac is in very good shape!!
Surprisingly it is! I've got more Al Bowlly on 78 with Roy Fox and band, but those records tend to be in very poor condition. I guess it's because they were more popular than obscure bands like Sid Phillips.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 Ha, yes that's very much a possibility, I've seen and heard many records that are in perfect condition, but in my experience, filthy, just because nobody liked the music on them when they were released, and they were forgotten about, tossed around, beat up a bit.. But after a good cleaning they shine, and in sound as well. Aside from mostly minor scratches, of course. Anyhow, how are those old shellac 73 RPM records? I deal with vinyl, 33 1/3 records and 45 rpm, so I really don't know much about 78s, and I only have a few of them, and they're not shellac I don't think.. Not to mention the only machine I have that plays 78 RPM records, is flimsy and seems cheap, and it's from the 70's. Doesn't have a needle currently. Although I have a diamond stylus I believe, somewhere.. But I am not sure what it's made for.
@@شعبة-ت6ط Hi, sorry for the late reply. I'd recommend buying a brand new modern turntable that can play 33 1/3, 45 & 78rpm records. It will probably set you back at least $300 so it's up to you.
78rpm records break easily and they should always be stored vertically up right. If you are easily bothered by surface noise, I'd recommend to only buy no less than VG copies and preferably NM or VG++. You're also going to need a stylus only meant for playing 78rpm records (bigger grooves).
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 Gotcha, $300 is not that much, I'm also involved in ham radio somewhat, and that is a REALLY expensive hobby as well.. But even more so, because something as simple as a portable, powerful antenna, can set you back a ton more than 300 dollars, easily! lol..
That is indeed the dream record of Mr Bowlly im surprised to see it play live on a turntable it's incredible! I hope to find a copy of that soon but it does sound really rare
SO INCREDIBLY RARE! IM JEALOUS. And also, incredible quality, the bass is extremely clear throughout the whole song.
I was lucky, I wish the same luck to you in your finds.
I was only familiar with the Elmo Tanner whistling version. Thank you for this.
And I was only familiar with the Rock-afire Explosion version.
Love we can hear the scratches on the record.
Authentic copy right there. Here's the same record but in better quality: th-cam.com/video/_52qmegoR_k/w-d-xo.html
You have this? That's amazing! You are a lucky guy! Enjoy it and take care of it!
I store it in a cool room-temperature box with a sturdy 10" sleeve. I am lucky to have it.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 VERY lucky!
thank god the caretaker revived this music. this really is amazing
I am so incredibly jealous haha
EATEOT - It's Just A Burning Memory
I'm not too familiar with The Caretaker, but I do appreciate what I've heard so far. I've got a somewhat better sounding video of "Heartaches" on my channel, but feel free to sample literally anything from my channel. I've also just transferred this record with a newer 78rpm stylus, which I plan to upload to my channel as a reupload (in a slightly better quality).
EATEOT - Heartaches - Al Bowlly
It's just a burning memory
Actually this is the original song pls shut up :)
I have the same record player
Nice. I really like it, but it isn't as dense as some of the other models.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 what model is it? it doesn't look like an LP120 is it?
@@oldradiosnphonographs yes, an LP120X-USB
Hi, could you upload a lossless transfer of this song and the runout groove somewhere? Would be cool to have it without TH-cam's nasty compression, and it would help with my pseudo-remaster project.
I donno if this is what you meant, but it's the closest I've got so far ://th-cam.com/video/_52qmegoR_k/w-d-xo.html
The runout groove on my copy of Heartaches are "13773 A"
It would be compressed no matter where I would upload it on the internet (wireless bit-rated compression with servers in the cloud will do that). I think you meant the crappy recording of this video, with which I used my broken ass Samsung phone.
There's really no way to circumvent digital compression on the internet, obviously. I don't mean to sound like an ass, but there's just no way. If it's digitized, it's digitally compressed in some way from the very start.
Seriously heartaches sounds like it's just a burning memory
no shit
you spammed this poor man's both uploads of heartaches... and sounds like it because it's the original sample
No shit sherlock Its the original sample 😐
You get eateot
This shows The Caretaker did more than just slow it down.
Well mainly just cut all the parts besides the intro.
Al Bowlly.
I will always remember.
Isn’t this $1000 USD? Crazy
yes lmao
:O
I own the same turntable, but how do you play 78's on it, and what is a good number to hold down the needle? Mine is "2".
If you want to play 78s on that turntable, you'll have to purchase a separate 78rpm needle (stylus) and set the tracking force to 4.5g and anti-skate to 4.5. If you want the best possible sound quality you'd also need to balance the tonearm to the platter, get the turntable leveled perfectly and ajust the azimuth.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 I got a blue stylus, and I'm doing balance for for the tonearm, but thanks for the response back.
@@KylerTheBroadcastMinister The most important thing you do is to have a stylus that is between 2.5 or 3 millimeter in size.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505 k I will check it soon
It's just a burning memory confirmed
Out of curiosity, what site did you find this on?
Al Bowlly Club
The caretaker A1 it's just a burning memory
Would this record be for sale?
Thank god The Caretaker revived this music
Is this record a 78??
Yes, It's a 78 rpm record. Played with a 78 stylus. Trying to find the alternate take though.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505
Could you please make a video with this same record however playing it at a slower tempo?? It would be greatly appreciated.
@@blaze6251 ok. I'll try.
@@blaze6251 I could also send you an mp3 or wav of Heartaches. If you go to the about section of my channel.
@@alternateunreleasedshellac505
Don’t worry about it, I just wanted to see if you played the record slowed down that it could sound like the caretakers “just a burning memory”
The caretaker