New Underwater Drone Flies AND Swims

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ย. 2015
  • Part submarine, part aircraft, Rutgers University researchers have developed a drone that is just as at home underwater as it is flying through the air. Watch our video to see the "Naviator" drone in action!
    Connect with us on Facebook - / rutgersu
    Follow us on Twitter - / rutgersu
    Instagram - / rutgersu
    Pinterest - / rutgersu
    Check out the Rutgers Today news website - www.rutgerstoday.rutgers.edu
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 268

  • @tlundby
    @tlundby 8 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    I'd call it a Drown.

    • @anthonymorford6444
      @anthonymorford6444 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Pun intended?

    • @acw2582
      @acw2582 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Brilliant

    • @RutgersToday
      @RutgersToday  5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I know it's a bit of a delayed laugh but..... Hahahahahahahahahah

  • @PatrickSavalle
    @PatrickSavalle 8 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    So now we will see not only video's with hawks and eagles attacking drones, but also sharks and barracuda's :)

  • @flarion00
    @flarion00 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing breakthrough. They need back propellers too. Have a switch that puts it is sub mode to activate the rear propellers. I noticed when it tried to move forward underwater it didn't do too well.

  • @318miker
    @318miker 8 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    never work until they can figure out to send the signals wireless

    • @RutgersToday
      @RutgersToday  8 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      +Mikey Rothwell Hi Mike, thanks for the comment. Unfortunately the comment didn't make it into this video but they will be using acoustic signals underwater to control it wirelessly. Evidently that technology already exists.

    • @Drawliphant
      @Drawliphant 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      +Rutgers Today Acoustic signals travel at the speed of sound. While the speed of sound is very fast it is still nothing compared to the speed of light. Lag is a serious concern and will limit the distance the drone is operable from.

    • @eatDAmeats416
      @eatDAmeats416 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Mikey Rothwell this could be fixed by a deployable/re-trackable antenna that floats on the surface , though that can cause problems with excess weight. the issue i am seeing is stability in water. i wonder if they have looked in to rotation method of the aft propellers or going with a 6 propeller design (4V, 2H) for more smooth horizontal traversing.

    • @nataliaruiz3025
      @nataliaruiz3025 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ఆఆఅఆ

    • @nataliaruiz3025
      @nataliaruiz3025 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      షృపహ

  • @shawnsamson6845
    @shawnsamson6845 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect for underwater footage of swimming movement analysis! I love it!

  • @hcongthanh
    @hcongthanh 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great ideas and efforts! Highly appreciated!
    What is the tether specification, anybody can help?
    I would like to do exactly the same drone but mainly for underwater usage? Thanks

  • @jrmc530
    @jrmc530 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Imagine fpv racing drones like this! Racing in air and underwater 😂😂😂 that would be crazy!!!

  • @JoshWithrow
    @JoshWithrow 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great edit! Thanks for sharing!

  • @HalcyonVoid
    @HalcyonVoid 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @0:30 There is a very good reason for that. Specialized vehicles that can perform one task really well is better than something that can do several tasks moderately well. That is why the Military doesn't use single vehicles for a wide range of tasks very often, and why the Military seems to have many different vehicles and many variants of each, because they are all specialized for set tasks.

  • @maxroberts2048
    @maxroberts2048 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can see lots of applications. Neat!

  • @bebehasbebehas2287
    @bebehasbebehas2287 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a chance to intall bigger batteries? The teather makes it inpractical, and yeah, I know the teather it's for testing purposes.

  • @afif9862
    @afif9862 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can u or anyone pls make a tutorial of making this drone?pls send me the link if there's any.

  • @_VATSALMODI
    @_VATSALMODI 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    is there any update in these drone and can we get some material regarding this project

  • @yourworstnightmare1488
    @yourworstnightmare1488 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is optic fibre guidance system utilized here?
    I am asking this due to the fact that the majority of sl torpedoes are guided with optic fibre.

  • @sanketochavan
    @sanketochavan 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    i don't want to belittle your innovation but the way video is edited gives an impression that you just waterproofed an already existing drone technology. It doesn't do justice to your hardwork; plus, disappoints d tech enthusiasts but still you rocked.

    • @Rubafix989
      @Rubafix989 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm not sure there is anything more to see in that school project. It's a waterproofed drone running a regular flight controller.

    • @iz723
      @iz723 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      With a reversed set of props. gravity works too slowly underwater

    • @sliskekeeling
      @sliskekeeling 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@iz723 it's about the friction, not gravity

  • @vette0812
    @vette0812 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's awesome!!!

  • @panduadikara9078
    @panduadikara9078 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    it's basicly a waterproof drone

  • @Ben0_o
    @Ben0_o 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Surprisingly practical. Nice!

  • @misterguts
    @misterguts 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Sure it starts off with bridge inspections.. Then someone comes along and attaches a handgun to it. Then it becomes an armed bridge inspector.

    • @Cohonees
      @Cohonees 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +cbmira01yt Or a Flame thrower - Then it becomes an armed flame throwing underwater bridge inspector LOL!" (Good point!)

    • @jimmysgameclips
      @jimmysgameclips 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +cbmira01yt 'Sergeant, the bridge inspector drone has become sentient and has gone postal!' 'BY GUM, I KNEW THIS WOULD HAPPEN'- ok time for me and my imagination to go to bed...

  • @ajayarun8674
    @ajayarun8674 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi I want what are the components required for this project

  • @leswoodies2
    @leswoodies2 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This seems totally military oriented

    • @Cohonees
      @Cohonees 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +leswoodies2 Exactly my point as well. "Underwater bridge inspections......" Naww, the concept is most likely sold to the military just like the Flame thrower was.

    • @MrGeforcerFX
      @MrGeforcerFX 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +leswoodies2 Yeah the navy wants to be able to deploy drones from there submarines, something like this would be able to deploy and be recaptured by the same sub without the sub having to surface, basically sub gets better SA and keeps it's stealth.

    • @Gansekommando
      @Gansekommando 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You do realize that a lot of military tech makes it into the consumer space right?

    • @GapahuksTube
      @GapahuksTube 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Scientist should think about how to make the world better instead of selling stuff to the military. Shame on them.

    • @oussematrabelsi9429
      @oussematrabelsi9429 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      they do both in general , alot of military tech has become mainstream tech. Military computers for example were very important in helping the development of computers in general

  • @BetaComparison5
    @BetaComparison5 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The beginning of the end for Aircraft Carriers (once you realize what a MUCH bigger version of this would be able to do; and not just go underwater)?

  • @WeBeYachting
    @WeBeYachting 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Enjoyed this video, thumbs up. Cheers from Sint Maarten

  • @honnryproduction7903
    @honnryproduction7903 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can it be bought ? BEcause I looked up in google and didn't find anything ...

  • @mattknight985
    @mattknight985 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I wonder how many amps those brush less motors are drawing due to the resistance of the water.

    • @iz723
      @iz723 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I wonder whether they change modes when in water otherwise I imagine the motors will burn out

    • @dtiydr
      @dtiydr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Water cooled you know..

    • @dtiydr
      @dtiydr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They of course dont go full throttle under water.

  • @devanchandrasekharan5866
    @devanchandrasekharan5866 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    propeller which can be used in air and water...is it possible??

  • @GloomGaiGar
    @GloomGaiGar 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    pretty damn sure i saw this in Red Alert 3 XD

  • @BboyCorrosive
    @BboyCorrosive 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gotta love how they actually promote it's use in military equipment 0_o

  • @krisantoabast5014
    @krisantoabast5014 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    can i have the journal/research paper on this? im trying to make a research into this as well and it's quite interesting to see! im a student from Indonesia Btw

  • @fredfpv1485
    @fredfpv1485 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    very cool bro!! subbed

  • @sitizabedahsamsudin3141
    @sitizabedahsamsudin3141 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow so nice drone

  • @rekharamkumar9605
    @rekharamkumar9605 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    which motor u have used in this drone???????????????????

  • @KindS220
    @KindS220 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The ideas nice, even i was thinking same of a similar kind, but I don't think a rotor mechanism would be efficient for such an amphibious craft.

  • @rhicksotillo1805
    @rhicksotillo1805 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    what SERVO motor did you used?

  • @NickWheeler9559
    @NickWheeler9559 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What pressure can it stand

  • @ajayarun8674
    @ajayarun8674 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to fabricate this robot and what are components should be required

  • @mannishaprasad9362
    @mannishaprasad9362 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is the cost of the product where can you order

  • @andypampreen8906
    @andypampreen8906 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder how much weight it could carry, as well as the rate at which cost increases or increases as you scale up it's size. Could this possibly be an effective way of collecting water samples to monitor coastal biogeochemistry, (as opposed to having a stationary sampling device, or field crew)?

    • @PanDaBoMa
      @PanDaBoMa ปีที่แล้ว

      Nordstream1/2?

  • @brentholman168
    @brentholman168 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool!

  • @Panurg81
    @Panurg81 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    i wonder how it can handle all the thrash, fishnets and ropes in the ocean. props no good there ^^

    • @BonesTheCat
      @BonesTheCat 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      How do flying drones handle hitting a tree?

    • @kodguerrero
      @kodguerrero 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      They fall to the ground. Good luck diving to get your sinking drone

    • @Ben0_o
      @Ben0_o 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      kodguerrero Just pull the wire.

    • @Ben0_o
      @Ben0_o 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @youtubeShadowBan A submarine can't fly up under the bridge. Even if your tried swinging the sub by the wire like an idiot, it still won't reach most of the underside.

    • @douglasmaiden68
      @douglasmaiden68 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Build multiple saws within it and allow it to go clockwise and counterclockwise to cut through multiple things that stops its movement.

  • @unclemarky3
    @unclemarky3 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    holaaa lindo video me gustaria que permanezcan haciendo contenido de la misma calidad!!! Voy a seguir mirando sus creaciones. Les envio un abrazo nos vemos luego ❤️👍🏽

  • @Fedorpro
    @Fedorpro 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    КРУТО ! скоро у всех такие будут :)

  • @bignatec1000
    @bignatec1000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wouldn’t EDFs be more efficient for underwater maneuverability?

  • @drewwinfield3507
    @drewwinfield3507 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where can you buy it?

  • @sergebigot8870
    @sergebigot8870 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perso, Je pense que le system à double hélices à rotation inverse est trés bien pour l'air. Autant la forme des hélices n'est pas adaptée pour l'eau (trop de déperdition de puissance). Il faudrait, peut être, mieux profilée pour l'eau les hélices inférieures. Celles ci ne fonctionnant que sous l'eau. Pour les hélices supérieures, leurs permettre de se replier sous l'eau, ou avoir un pas adaptable plus approprié au milieu aquatique. Peut-être un mixe des 2 solutions.

  • @darkevil3972
    @darkevil3972 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    when will it be released

  • @Maskenken
    @Maskenken 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like there are some structural issues. Also not able to move effectively in the water. Looks like a mild current would defeat it under water.

  • @darkevil3972
    @darkevil3972 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    when it will be released ?

  • @budstephens7239
    @budstephens7239 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting boys !!! Just remember , when they were riding horses they said automobiles ?? Naw that will never catch on ... so keep up the good work ... will you send me one when you put it on the market?

  • @ryandawson6320
    @ryandawson6320 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Put cones around the props so it can maneuver better underwater and should be able to fly to .

  • @CindyGlady
    @CindyGlady 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Not yet but I'm going back in time for work

  • @weeaboostarshine435
    @weeaboostarshine435 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ohhhh so it's just the more advanced version of this thing that people think are aliens

    • @Buttcakes15
      @Buttcakes15 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you using your brain?

    • @weeaboostarshine435
      @weeaboostarshine435 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Buttcakes15 I feel that I am. I'm always skeptical and prefer to rule out all rational explanations before deciding to believe the more unlikely one. I do believe there are other planets in this universe that have life on them, but I highly doubt they've made it all the way here.

    • @Buttcakes15
      @Buttcakes15 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@weeaboostarshine435 believe it or not, I’ve always been skeptical of ufo’s until about 2 years ago when the government released the 3 iconic videos and confirmed their legitimacy.
      That was the turning point, and you pair that with the testimony from Commander David Fravor who actually chased and engaged with one of these things. That testimony was one of the videos released by the government.
      So you have a very reliable source saying mind bending things, paired with the videos that show mind bending things that you can actually see with your own eyes.
      As a former skeptic, it’s hard to refute.

  • @simow77
    @simow77 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    hay thats pretty cool

  • @emadamir9487
    @emadamir9487 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excuse me , can i have the full research ??

  • @dallinbehunin7027
    @dallinbehunin7027 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are the motors themselves rotating? What is the purpose of that and what type of motors are being used on this vehicle?

    • @SharphandXeno
      @SharphandXeno 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They are called outrunner brushless motors. The coils are stationary and the can which is lined with magnets rotates around the coils. These motors are very common in today's rc airplanes, helicopters and multirotors.

  • @Adiki97
    @Adiki97 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow

  • @connorbolander
    @connorbolander 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That is not a robust underwater vehicle. You need to install an auxiliary propulsion system.

  • @john-cv2sm
    @john-cv2sm 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just thought about what to look up today, and I chose "Underwater Drone"

  • @kakhak
    @kakhak 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good thing

  • @juanmorales1323
    @juanmorales1323 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How fast can it go under water

  • @fabiofabius7065
    @fabiofabius7065 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    props in the air and sort of jet in the water? :D

  • @HomedronevideosNet
    @HomedronevideosNet 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Keep up the good work and come join us and leave your link in our Forum!!

  • @Zralock79
    @Zralock79 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    wow... cooling problem solved!... :D

  • @HoStevie
    @HoStevie 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let's take one surfing!

    • @TheMusketITuckedIt204
      @TheMusketITuckedIt204 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Ho Stevie! I think it's designed with better intentions in mind lol

    • @HoStevie
      @HoStevie 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      TheMusketITuckedIt haha definitely

  • @artphot2008
    @artphot2008 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    ติดใบพัดหางเรือเพิ่มเวลาลงน้ำ

  • @leomartacbobo
    @leomartacbobo 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow

  • @d-dogjackson7933
    @d-dogjackson7933 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sweet cord coming from it..

    • @RutgersToday
      @RutgersToday  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks. We like it too.

  • @samanli-tw3id
    @samanli-tw3id 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now what we need is a diving helicopter!

  • @goldendive0078
    @goldendive0078 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've seen waterproof quadcopters. This is great but they shouldnt say they're the first

    • @TheMusketITuckedIt204
      @TheMusketITuckedIt204 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +GoldenDive007 Then who was? This is the first time I ever saw a drone fully operational underwater and in the air.

  • @sidknee8490
    @sidknee8490 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool. Yeah salt water is very conductive so could be an issue. Given the motors are effectively shorting out under water this would cause rapid corrosion. Fitting ballast tanks and conventional prop like a submarine would be better than the rotors as these would flex under load. Interesting concept tho 8\10..

  • @arnckuloglu4577
    @arnckuloglu4577 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    POV: you seal the electronics of a drone and put an antenna that sticks out the water.

  • @CalvinCai_Frisbee
    @CalvinCai_Frisbee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    its just a few line more of code and waterproofing the copter.....

    • @the48thronin97
      @the48thronin97 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Calvin C One does not simply 'write more code', at least in my limited hobbyist experiences.

    • @martonlerant5672
      @martonlerant5672 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Calvin C
      have u seen the cable... that was necessary, as rc tend to not work under water.

  • @davidrojas6844
    @davidrojas6844 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    fácil solución se ínsula el área de los motores no le entré agua caballeros

  • @tomhugill9988
    @tomhugill9988 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have to ask why a cable is needed when 27mhz, 40mhz, 72mhz and 433mhz rc gear all work under water and are commercially available.

    • @douglasbutler4360
      @douglasbutler4360 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Tom Hugill Freshwater yes, but not at all in seawater.

  • @sparticus214
    @sparticus214 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    All drone work under water as long as you waterproof it

  • @ConspiracytardHunter420
    @ConspiracytardHunter420 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You'd have to find a way to shield those brushless motors from water if you want to take these into the ocean. Salt water rusts the bearings in brushless motors. Other than that, this type of craft may see real world use.

    • @geekazoid
      @geekazoid 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +flyingchimp99 environmentally sealed bearings.

    • @ConspiracytardHunter420
      @ConspiracytardHunter420 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      sneescampers If salt gets into a motor the bearings are going to rust quickly. I had a customer who ended up submerging his phantom 3 in the ocean for 30 seconds, he took instantly grabbed a hose and poured fresh water all over it and inside it to flush out the salt water but it was too late.
      A mere 30 seconds of exposure and within 2 days the motors wouldn't rotate.
      Was over a 600 dollar repair.

  • @andy_barus
    @andy_barus 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is there a cable connected?

    • @mattwoods5380
      @mattwoods5380 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Andy Barus most submersible rovs have cables because radio signals travel poorly through water

  • @AdenTube1
    @AdenTube1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW! This is to risky for my Mavic :)

  • @felefelix1764
    @felefelix1764 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    DJI needs to do this :D

  • @antonrudenham3259
    @antonrudenham3259 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    So......................................It's a waterproof drone then?

  • @MaxFagin
    @MaxFagin 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    A fascinating problem the video doesn't really do justice to: Pitch and roll control with a quadcopter is pretty straightforward regardless of how fast the rotors are spinning, but quadcopters with fixed rotors (like this one) actually can't control their yaw aerodynamically! Instead, they can only yaw by shifting angular momentum between pairs of counter-rotating propellers (speed up the CCW propellers and slow down the CW propellers, the net lift will remain the same, but the vehicle will yaw CW). Which means that available yaw authority (unlike pitch and roll authority) disappears as the propellers slow down!
    So given that the speed of the propellers goes down ~1000 times when the vehicle is submerged, it means this vehicle probably has ~zero ability to control its yaw while underwater. Notice how in the video we never really see it yaw while underwater? Just pitch and roll? That's probably because it can't yaw underwater! It needs an entirely different set of control laws underwater that rely only on pitch and roll! It would be a fascinating controls problem to figure out.

  • @123thedman1
    @123thedman1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    it has a cable because the signal can penetrate water very far

  • @techysinsight
    @techysinsight 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can u explain how it works under water with signsl transmitters

    • @matthewmacys
      @matthewmacys 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it can't yet ( the signals go through wire)

    • @dollarbill5471
      @dollarbill5471 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's easy, you only change the frequency to one compatible with water instead of the one used in air. That's how simple it is.

    • @jamesbrown99991
      @jamesbrown99991 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      like which frequency? If you use VLF you'll get up to 20 meters below the surface, but your antenna will be of the order of 2.5km long

    • @dollarbill5471
      @dollarbill5471 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      jessbrown99991 I dont know the exact frequency, but studying Fisics I saw how it depends on the frequency in each material (it's density is proportional to the frequency you need). And the air is the less productive material because it is gas and waves travel better in solid materials or in liquid, in this case. So when density is bigger, it's better to transmit information.
      Maybe it would be similar to RADARs.
      PS: Srry for my english, it's too early in my country rk.

    • @matthewmacys
      @matthewmacys 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Black magic

  • @AEMBowers
    @AEMBowers 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not sure what makes this amphibious vehicle any different than a standard multirotor beyond water proofing. I would imagine that all one would have to do is water-proof an over-the-counter multirotor, then, once it is immersed, immediately lower the throttle settings so that the prop RPMs would not be too high within the new fluid medium (they'd also just need to pick a decent motor kv that would allow for reasonable operation at both RPM ranges). You might also need to simply assign a switch on the transmitter to change the PID settings of the flight controller, once it's immersed, in order to change the reactivity of pitch, roll, and yaw.

    • @martonlerant5672
      @martonlerant5672 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +AEMontoya
      And put on wire control to have signal underwater

  • @pablobada4419
    @pablobada4419 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think the best for it has a propeler for water

  • @brendanhaugland5546
    @brendanhaugland5546 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What an excellent tea bag.

  • @Sanyey
    @Sanyey 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why not add a sideways propeller, for only underwater propulsion? :/

  • @jacksonarmstrong7175
    @jacksonarmstrong7175 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the battery life like on that thing?

    • @sohaibrafishaik3672
      @sohaibrafishaik3672 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      there is no battery do you see the wire that supplies the power

    • @NickMoore
      @NickMoore 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The wire will be for communication not power. Radio, specifically microwaves, do not penetrate through water so control must be done via a wire or through autonomous software.

  • @march.4666
    @march.4666 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you repair pipelines? Or only destroy ;)
    Nice invention!!

  • @R1fanatic112
    @R1fanatic112 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Time will tell how long that drone can fly without the sealed motors overheating, overmore what type of remote control are they goung to use that penetrates more than a few ft of water!!

    • @MrAirgame
      @MrAirgame 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess those kind of drones are/will be autonomous :) ... So no direct RC

    • @lighthouseministries7
      @lighthouseministries7 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sonar controlled? :)

    • @skyhawk551
      @skyhawk551 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      out runner motors don't use brushes so actually they don't need to be sealed from water, just the motor control circuits

  • @ArdePier
    @ArdePier 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    GIVE ME PLZ THAT THING!!

  • @WladBlank
    @WladBlank 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    It isnt wireless because it is not supposed to be controlled.
    Many drones are capable to fly on their own.

  • @LucasBoysOutdoors
    @LucasBoysOutdoors 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The game has changed.

  • @princecarlton3291
    @princecarlton3291 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    amen\

  • @MC-xb1jy
    @MC-xb1jy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have new idea about these, i'm already done it.

  • @tracym427
    @tracym427 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is not a first. The same thing that makes any drone fly will make it maneuver in water. Like everyone states it will have to be wired..

  • @adhyayankumar9965
    @adhyayankumar9965 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Parth soni an Indian . Jai Hind 🙏

  • @valenghi
    @valenghi 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    what happend to youtube tonight? it doesnt work!

  • @manusebastian39
    @manusebastian39 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good effort by the design is inefficient and dont think it's gonna work at all while navigating through strong currents like in a river

  • @nestorschalbetter5739
    @nestorschalbetter5739 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    So a waterproof drone...