La musica puede aplacar a las fieras,pero a los hombres no y esta demostrado historicamente,el idelismo no,sólo la eficacia y realismo nos puede ir salvando,y viva la musica que se hace para ser amiga del placer.
You sentence is unusual, maybe the google translator that is off, but if it is not the sentence goes back and forth with opposites that counter each others meaning. Does this statement come from someone in histories past? "Music can placate the wild beasts, but not men, and this has been historically proven" Where in history has music placated animals? Unless this is a metaphor for humans acting like an animal and "men" in this way would be considered 'people of sophistication'. The historically proven part is a bit of an unusual claim, there are plenty of sophisticated men who like classical music that are complete monsters from time to time. "not idealism, only efficiency and realism can save us" Although being a realist is an admirable quality, it is also brash and sometimes disruptive to 'higher qualities'. Idealism or optimism is not a negative quality unless a person stays there without action or practicality. Sometimes the most efficient way is not the best way. Lastly "and long live the music that is made to be a friend of pleasure." music made for pleasure is neither efficient or realist, its often an abstract mode of the senses and emotional field of man. Music oftentimes elevates man to a higher quality of idealistic virtues which is hardly efficient, nor is some pleasures a good thing at all and can be a distraction to life. This is why I call your statement above a bit confusing, I may be reading into it a bit too much but I hope to get a reply since it sparked a curiosity in me. Cheers
La musica puede aplacar a las fieras,pero a los hombres no y esta demostrado historicamente,el idelismo no,sólo la eficacia y realismo nos puede ir salvando,y viva la musica que se hace para ser amiga del placer.
You sentence is unusual, maybe the google translator that is off, but if it is not the sentence goes back and forth with opposites that counter each others meaning. Does this statement come from someone in histories past?
"Music can placate the wild beasts, but not men, and this has been historically proven" Where in history has music placated animals? Unless this is a metaphor for humans acting like an animal and "men" in this way would be considered 'people of sophistication'. The historically proven part is a bit of an unusual claim, there are plenty of sophisticated men who like classical music that are complete monsters from time to time.
"not idealism, only efficiency and realism can save us" Although being a realist is an admirable quality, it is also brash and sometimes disruptive to 'higher qualities'. Idealism or optimism is not a negative quality unless a person stays there without action or practicality. Sometimes the most efficient way is not the best way.
Lastly "and long live the music that is made to be a friend of pleasure." music made for pleasure is neither efficient or realist, its often an abstract mode of the senses and emotional field of man. Music oftentimes elevates man to a higher quality of idealistic virtues which is hardly efficient, nor is some pleasures a good thing at all and can be a distraction to life.
This is why I call your statement above a bit confusing, I may be reading into it a bit too much but I hope to get a reply since it sparked a curiosity in me.
Cheers
Beautiful~~
Thank you.
magnífico