Big Tech - S1E06 - Anand Giridharadas on How Taxes - Not Philanthropy - Will Change the World

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 มิ.ย. 2024
  • There is a growing sense that governments are not able to effectively solve the problems of the world. The narrative that governments are slow, costly and not informed enough to make the right decisions. This stands in contrast to the private sector; business leaders are regarded as effective leaders because they generate incredible wealth.
    The “savior complex” is particularly strong among the wealthiest tech executives. Their world view is rooted in the idea that we can use technology to solve all the world’s problems.
    In this episode of Big Tech, co-hosts David Skok and Taylor Owen speak with Anand Giridharadas, author of Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World.
    Giridharadas speaks about this rise of powerful tech executives who are using their wealth and influence to reshape systems of governance - instead of supporting democratic institutions, they are creating their own philanthropic organizations. For Giridharadas these elites are the new plutocrats who have seized power through wealth, much like the railroad tycoons of old. “There is enormous moral difference between five guys deciding to do something and a city deciding to do something. This is something I think you wouldn't have had to explain to people 100 years or 200 years ago when we actually had more faith in the idea of democratic action,” Giridharadas says. He goes on to explain that where funds are coming from is more important than the amount of funding, citing military aid to Ukraine as an example. There is a difference between $400 million dollars provided by the American taxpayer and $400 million dollars provided by a wealthy executive who isn’t elected to represent the best interests of a population. Giridharadas argues that if tech billionaires really want to help make the world a better place, they should just pay their fair share in taxes, and leave governments to solve the world’s problems.

ความคิดเห็น • 142

  • @pauls4099
    @pauls4099 4 ปีที่แล้ว +149

    Anand Giridharadas is an intellectual black belt who should be featured on more mainstream media as he consistently and correctly diagnosis the problems in American society.

    • @laurettegomes1862
      @laurettegomes1862 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Not just America ...its global

    • @clarestucki5151
      @clarestucki5151 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually, he's a leftie nut job who lets his politidal ideology inform his concept of how capitalism works.

    • @chokinonashes61
      @chokinonashes61 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@clarestucki5151
      So you think capitalism is working well for the majority of people?

    • @dans.6525
      @dans.6525 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Clare Stucki - what proof do you have to label him as “lefti nut job”? ? ?

    • @louiscyfear878
      @louiscyfear878 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      _So why is he always lecturing and never debating?_
      If you ask me, he is more of a religious leader.

  • @dealmaven123
    @dealmaven123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    This guy is brilliant in speaking uncomfortable truth to entrenched power. We need so much more of this.

  • @wasy35
    @wasy35 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Anand says what needs to be said.

    • @Achrononmaster
      @Achrononmaster 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah, he only says half the story. If you learn MMT you'll find the other half: try these talks: th-cam.com/video/4QTmTUhsV5E/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/31eUsJRFcNo/w-d-xo.html

  • @philgwellington6036
    @philgwellington6036 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Well well. Welcome to big tech. Thanks guys. Good interview. Pity I'm the second viewer. Anand makes you think critically, and it's critical.

  • @vincesiciliano6363
    @vincesiciliano6363 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The interesting feature that I gather from Mr. Giridhardadas comments is that this phenomenon, is occurring across many countries in the Western world. I would also mention positive change is something we should all strive for. To that end, it is up to us to do anything we can to encourage the American voters to vote for Senator Bernie Sanders.
    I and many others believe that Mr. Sanders represents a once in a life time opportunity. A Democratic Socialist in the Whitehouse would have a positive impact on the lives of common people across the globe. Therefore, I encourage all my American friends to not become “the indifferent” but to get engaged and vote for Senator Sanders the only person I know who “walks the talk” and who will work for the betterment of working people.
    Therefore, as the song says “reach out in the darkness and you may find a friend”, talk to your neighbor, email your friends, get involved we can make this a better world for all.

  • @kathyinwonderlandl.a.8934
    @kathyinwonderlandl.a.8934 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Love you Anand!! We need more people like you.. smart, clever, dedicated, positive, an Old Soul.

  • @martins1256
    @martins1256 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Loved it. Anand! You are so intelligent; my head hurts.

    • @chokinonashes61
      @chokinonashes61 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My heart hurts but he provides suggestions too.

  • @teresabarnes-matych
    @teresabarnes-matych 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks for your voice Anand, it is appreciated more than you know!
    Teresa from California
    🙏❤️✌️🌎✌️❤️🙏

  • @kokoleka808
    @kokoleka808 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Anand often makes reference to the Overton Window and how politicians have to operate within its framework in order to be elected/reelected. Would like to hear his take on the impact that think tanks along with the plutocrats who contribute to such think tanks, have on public opinion, which translates to political policy and power.

    • @dbissex
      @dbissex 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      He mentions Jane Mayer's book Dark Money in this interview - she's all about the history of this growing the movement of the Overton window

  • @chuckkottke
    @chuckkottke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    How true! The Post office works very well, so do road building crews!

  • @IanPunter
    @IanPunter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i had one public sector job and over a dozen private sector jobs. it took years to shake of my conservatard brainwashing to realize the public sector operation was extremely productive and efficient, rivaling any of the private employers.

  • @chuckkottke
    @chuckkottke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Concentrated wealth is concentrated insulation. I keep thinking about King Louie and Marie Antoinette, lost in their Playland.

    • @a_diamond
      @a_diamond 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, but the people suffered for a long time before enough people had had enough. twitter.com/AbraarKaran?s=20
      There is a reason why such uprisings tend to be bloody..
      Wouldn't it be better not to make people that desperate?

  • @qibble455
    @qibble455 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Seems completely obvious once you hear it. Great guest, Great interview.

  • @rebeccajohnson8579
    @rebeccajohnson8579 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Anand, I so RESPECT & ADMIRE all that you SPEAK! When will EVERYDAY People accept this SIMPLE CONCEPT? It just BLOWS MY MIND that the average Human Being, don't get this SIMPLE explanation!

  • @djalead.7301
    @djalead.7301 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This man lays it out so clearly and with such wise anecdotes and analogies. He needs to be more widely heard. If listened to honestly only fools and scoundrels could or would even have the nerve to dispute him.

  • @BeachgirlKarli
    @BeachgirlKarli 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I absolutely love listening Anand Giridharadas and how he breaks down the the hypocrisy. He has this gift of explaining that you don't feel left out of the conversation.

  • @hirschowitz1
    @hirschowitz1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Important conversation and very much appreciated. Marx is overlooked here but I’m impressed that Schumpeter is given a nod. Thank you for this.

  • @timothycurlee9682
    @timothycurlee9682 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    First let us end tax expenditures, ie tax breaks, subsidies, exemptions,etc for individuals and corporations. A wealth tax or even higher taxes will just be a full employment program for tax lawyers and accountants unless we end tax subsidies, which were 1.4 trillion in FY 2019

  • @wiblet
    @wiblet 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for making me brain critically for a good while! Let's try and give this guy More Platform.

  • @rivkaestherkletski4184
    @rivkaestherkletski4184 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good minds have often wondered why thousands show up for sports but it is so hard to get 5 citizens in a room for a political discussion. There must be a way to make such discussions appealing. What is necessary of course is to bring about a birth of consciousness.

  • @lenering1084
    @lenering1084 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anand is brilliant. Americans need to listen to him. I am reading “The winner take it all”.

  • @snakey973
    @snakey973 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That intro- YES!

  • @mathewmcgill6266
    @mathewmcgill6266 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really great discussion.

  • @gendashwhy
    @gendashwhy ปีที่แล้ว

    Anand is music to the people's ears.

  • @flexotronify
    @flexotronify 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm very hesitant of people "criticizing" the elite. Time after time these argument are made but later prove to be advantageous to them keeping power. I understand 40 minutes isn't enough time to clarify his points so I'll will read his book, so not to mischaracterize his points. Thank you for showcasing his ideas.

    • @mindovomatter5181
      @mindovomatter5181 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I see your point. Corporations have tried take over gov. We need to undo money in polotics and reform lobbyist as well as the ability for ooloticuans to profit from being poloticians.

    • @mytruthbekind5793
      @mytruthbekind5793 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      His book is great. Of course how to reform. He lays out what we know. He gives the support needed for reform.

    • @Eleriol84
      @Eleriol84 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mindovomatter5181
      If youre talking about the US then corporations took over the goverment decades ago

  • @LadyPinkster
    @LadyPinkster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would love to see him, Killer Mike and Rutger Bergman have an actual talk together.

  • @balderdashery1
    @balderdashery1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now if only we can get this mainstream.

  • @ericbray4286
    @ericbray4286 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "There is also this to be said. It is immoral to use private property in order to alleviate the horrible evils that result from the institution of private property. It is both immoral and unfair." Oscar Wilde "The Soul of Man Under Socialism."

    • @bicyclist2
      @bicyclist2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      WOW! That's an intense quote! Thanks.

  • @hopespringseternal8069
    @hopespringseternal8069 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is the type of discussion needed to save us from end capitalism hegemany or fascism ..not sure which

  • @CartoonManWhoo
    @CartoonManWhoo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    why has big tech never tried to tackle income inequality?

    • @bpalpha
      @bpalpha 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because that's their bread & butter too.

  • @GreenOrchid9
    @GreenOrchid9 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Annan in political arena in 12 years🤔📚💻

  • @francisjtuk
    @francisjtuk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always had the feeling that philanthropy had to be a kind of camouflage for something else. After all you can't just have the world's top capitalists who up until that point have been happily feasting on the exploitation of everyone and everything just doing a complete about turn. Doesn't happen. Delighted that this guy has called them out so eloquently.

  • @richvanasse4401
    @richvanasse4401 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And isn't the 5 rich people funding the project (instead of the taxation solution) just like corporations giving bonuses instead of raises?

  • @mikecar52
    @mikecar52 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would have liked to be able to see a transcript of this too

    • @cigi
      @cigi  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi mikecar52, you can find the transcript here: www.cigionline.org/big-tech/anand-giridharadas-how-taxes-not-philanthropy-will-change-world

  • @ajohnsonm1
    @ajohnsonm1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Government and businesses start ideally, but greed soon takes over

  • @evdokiademetriades4975
    @evdokiademetriades4975 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree terrific someone always always steals. Hello from South Africa.

  • @Achrononmaster
    @Achrononmaster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Taxes alone cause a net drain = austerity. What you really want is aggressive fiscal policy, spending FIRST then taxing LATER. What to spend on? A Job Guarantee for a start as a wage-price anchor and automatic inflation stabilizer. Second would be clean energy infrastructure. Third, but almost *the most important* is to regulate banks to narrow their activities to making only loans that can be repaid, and Fourth would be to tax (at an extremely high rate) all rentier (un-earned) income other than retiree incomes, to free up the real productive sector of the economy. Later, once retirees regain trust in government, you can tax all their rentier income (since it is a choke on the economy) and instead guarantee pension payments at a decent living income rate in perpetuity. All this is possible with no inflationary pressure once you understand MMT. I would also slowly retire all outstanding US Treasury bonds and not issue any more, they are a relic of the gold standard era (when money was literally finite in reserve because it was convertible to gold). The USA no longer needs to sell bonds to limit inflation, it can limit inflation purely through fines, fees, progressive taxation, rentier taxes and rationing of scarce precious resources, and of course the Job Guarantee employment buffer. Low interest rates are not needed to encourage investment, instead the government can always fund any projects that have the ready brains and power to go ahead, and which are worth the investment in terms of producing real material value for society. With a ZIRP for overnight cash rates, the US government can then get out of IR control policy and let commercial banks set their own rates, provided they are heavily regulated to not be able to lend to people who cannot repay the loan. When banks do make unpayable loans, the solution is debt cancellation, no questions asked. You cannot afford to let banskters get way with ripping people off by loaning out debt that cannot be repaid.

    • @bernadettesandoval3990
      @bernadettesandoval3990 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ending fractional reserve banking, end the FDIC, end fiat currency and everything sorts itself out

  • @diannaskare7829
    @diannaskare7829 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Green New Deal is Perfect for New Businesses!

  • @michaelwoods2903
    @michaelwoods2903 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Found you by accident; outstanding intellectual content and discourse. But you need to get out front and have a face and publicize your identity like The Hill, TYT or Jimmy Dore etc. Then you'd really soar in profile and efficacy for your noble goals. Come on guys , get into a spotlight!! An aussie outsider.

  • @anthonyeller9175
    @anthonyeller9175 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about Google "don't be evil"
    Would change "disclosure to use" to a simple one paragraph in plain English? Same with facebook and all other social media on-line!

  • @wlf9108
    @wlf9108 ปีที่แล้ว

    We need public banks.

  • @boyax7825
    @boyax7825 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    please do the philippines

  • @Insightts
    @Insightts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anand I'm 100% with you bro, but they will be calling you a socialist or a communist in no time. :D

  • @therearenoshortcuts9868
    @therearenoshortcuts9868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sigh... no dude. both taxes and philanthropy are fucked
    rich people just buy the politicians....

  • @bicyclist2
    @bicyclist2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lots of idiots in the older comment section. And lots of good newer comments. I agree with Anand Giridharadas on many levels.

  • @batgirlp5561
    @batgirlp5561 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hope Anand doesn't end up paid off by the rich.

  • @amrockstars4407
    @amrockstars4407 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if the Govt. gave us options and be transparent where the put in the taxes to work. Both win win situations for all. I hope everyone do good and become rich(health, wealth and relationship) in their lives( and if you measure being rich by the amount of bucks in the bank then All the best to you too) Also me commenting just by reading the thumbnail.

  • @mikecar52
    @mikecar52 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about the 5 rich guys spend it and the cab drivers spend 4 too. Ukraine will be even better off.

  • @karenishness1
    @karenishness1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Om Bhur Bhuva Swaha, Genesis 1:29. Anand is wearing leather jackets so obviously he is not so kind to all earthlings. Logic may be right but so are all the Zuckerbergs.

    • @AZOffRoadster
      @AZOffRoadster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lets keep mythology out of the discussion, and stick with reality.

    • @TheBeatle49
      @TheBeatle49 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      PETA rabbit hole?

  • @seanfinnerty6362
    @seanfinnerty6362 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anand is selling books

  • @paololivrieri8041
    @paololivrieri8041 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nevermind what You're Saying, that Is what You Do All Day. The World Is Already Changing by Itself, as We Don't Cooperate. Have a Nice Day Brother.

  • @Sebastian-wm5es
    @Sebastian-wm5es 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you start to grab a billionaires money you can grab it all from everybody. This will not somehow magically stop.
    He spoke in other videos about a minimal state but he's propagating high taxes.
    He's not getting tired of communicating that poor women get slewn by evil men. (I don't belive him, I think he knows exactly how to play that).
    In another video he stated that the world is flat - ok, I'm not against it but it got blindly accepted by the female moderator, which was inept. (..he knows how to play that) watch?v=qcHlNKLQBIM
    I'm not pro billionaires and their plots, but he's going nowhere. If you decide with feelings you're beond hope. And that is what he's doing, he manipulates emotions. The best protection against such a manipulator is a rational thinker and btw, he doesn't like Zuck. But not because of what Zuck has done, he doesn't like him because of his expression-less-ness. Think about that, if you can.

  • @itzenormous
    @itzenormous 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've listened to this guy talk for over an hour, and I do not understand what his point is ... at all!!

  • @MiroBG359
    @MiroBG359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Plenty of regular people want their kids not in public schools where there is no accountability. Everyone has to put up with the bullies and class disruptors. Lots of Latinos in America for example send their kids to those. As for taxes, I'm nickled and dimed enough already. I'm not paying half my income to taxes like they do in Europe. Fund your pet ideas on your own

    • @ronaldronald8819
      @ronaldronald8819 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I live in Europe and i am happy to pay my taxes. And our public schools well they are good.

    • @MiroBG359
      @MiroBG359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ronaldronald8819 in your opinion. Which ain't much. So keep donating and don't lecture others to support your pet causes yeah?

    • @apt27b
      @apt27b 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      MiroBG What actually Anand is saying is that these Corporations(Plutocrats) because of their wealth, they influence laws including taxation. Which explains why you and I actually have to pay more in taxes compared to their billion dollar incomes. Anand is also saying that for these Corporations, philanthropy is also one of their ways in influencing laws and public opinion.

    • @tusharsingh4543
      @tusharsingh4543 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's only the case because in the US public schools are funded by the average tax returns of your post code. So it creates a two-tiered system where rich suburbs have quality public schools and inner city districts struggle to educated their students. All schools should be funded equally, that's the solution.

    • @MiroBG359
      @MiroBG359 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tusharsingh4543 if that's the case, why are Latino immigrants in America insisting on charter schools?
      Why is there a huge charter school in south Oklahoma City where low and middle class kids go and why are their parents organized so strongly and push for charter schools and school choice?