i feel like this tower failed based on them not thinking it could get in the game when it really should be if the staff team as a whole would like it on average the towers are polled by the staff, so the tower should pass based on it having the potential to be voted in by the staff team and not just one person's distaste. idk if it's just me, but i see a lot of fails from things that a curator would dislike more than the next person. like the odd themes and unindicated floors are likely way less of a problem for some curators. i swear towers were reviewed by multiple curators before. what happened to that? maybe the workload is too much, but submissions haven't been that full for a while. maybe they'll do that again with the new curators coming soon. what do you think? should they have multiple curators for a tower if it has potential? are verdicts based on personal biases a bit too much when it may not apply to other staff members?
imo the standards have gone WAY too high, like everything could be completely fine but then a curator finds 1 SLIGHT misalignment/deco/gp flaw and the tower gets hard failed and the creator gets blacklisted from submissions
Towers with 2020-era design: FAILURE A tower that LITERALLY BREAKS THE NAMING SCHEME, and is ALSO SC+, which means HOW WOULD IT BE CANON, and it being added would mean A READJUSTMENT TO THE Z9 LOBBY, as in LITERALLY NEEDING A CHANGE TO BE IN THERE (The Off-White AKA TOW, Zone 9 SC area is currently 4 sides for each of the 4 main SC difficulties, so where would it be? Up? A seperate area?): ACTUALLY BEING CONSIDERED, AND THE SC+ PART IS CONFIRMED VIA A TRANSPARENT PART WITH HORRIFIC'S COLOUR ON TOP OF THE DIFFICULTY BOARD
state of jtoh: - jukes can't even build purgatorio of it's liking 😂😂 - jukes is secretly sniffing vrchat harems - biotech genesis should whitelist in Tower World - prefers abuse of co based towers over semi-modern semi-classic towers - curators only looks at tower design and decoration and barely looked at gameplay - one curators distaste = you are dead! (as a tower submittor) - Curators who denied of this submission (or deconfirmed) thinks ToOG:Unleashed is way better than *(Your Tower)*
Bro nothing is worse than THAT tower Outside of gameplay It seemed well made Which sucks because… WHY WOULD YOU MAKE THAT I stopped like 2 minutes in to a video going through it
Whoever made ToOG deserves a public shaming, I rather play Citadel of Inception (ToI as a citadel) 10 times in a row then even play ToOG for a nanosecond. ToOG made every other NSFW artist look like a saint. It’s that bad.
@anotherstreamy The creator of towers like Tower of Super Stupid Security Systems, Citadel of Quadrilaterals and Steeple of Pumpkin Panic made Tower of Ooey Gooey. Have fun playing those towers! : )
Game link(even tho this vid is past its prime lmao): www.roblox.com/games/16595795462/OCEANIC-FEELING
can we have a new discord link? the other one's invalid
i feel like this tower failed based on them not thinking it could get in the game when it really should be if the staff team as a whole would like it on average
the towers are polled by the staff, so the tower should pass based on it having the potential to be voted in by the staff team and not just one person's distaste.
idk if it's just me, but i see a lot of fails from things that a curator would dislike more than the next person. like the odd themes and unindicated floors are likely way less of a problem for some curators. i swear towers were reviewed by multiple curators before. what happened to that? maybe the workload is too much, but submissions haven't been that full for a while. maybe they'll do that again with the new curators coming soon.
what do you think? should they have multiple curators for a tower if it has potential? are verdicts based on personal biases a bit too much when it may not apply to other staff members?
The funniest thing is that tower is now in whitelist
Can we all agree that the 2021 classic-modern style is peak
Waaaay better then the tower of rough ectoplasom idk modren slop today
yes it was peak
today's modern style is just modern slop
@@PanTostek yea like tonn
All I see now is long, puzzles, unique mechanics never to be seen again, and big basements.
This tower looks way more fun than paradise atoll steeples/towers
imo the standards have gone WAY too high, like everything could be completely fine but then a curator finds 1 SLIGHT misalignment/deco/gp flaw and the tower gets hard failed and the creator gets blacklisted from submissions
well the review said barely failed so this got a good shot w minor tweaks
ehh I agree but I wouldnt say THAT strict
Bit of an overstatement but if you don’t have 1k hours in studio minimum you have no chance lmao
Naw if it was 2021 or sum these all would be in jtoh
My towers in 2020 would have passed
2022 too this is good enough
they allowed toer
@@Brxert this is why the 2021 classic-modern/zone 4 style is peak
Yeah
this is a good tower, although it needs a bit more indication and it needs some nerfs
overall this is fire!
why does ToOF not even get whitelisted but tower of falling up gets to go in zone 9
because of krmal
@@dagooseronkohello cultured gd player
ToFU is goated
@@TheLocalClosetD3mon lies and deception
The “comparing” stage 😔
most failed towers that were not intended as a troll r actually pretty decent
I can't believe that this tower actually failed. It's literally better than some Ashen Towerworks towers.
Bro, why didn't we get this over the stupid umbrella steeple in PA as a rem tower?
since ToOF was made years after the PA contest???
Yeah ArmorHAD wouldn’t have made this tower 2 years ago when the PA contest was announced 💀
This tower just passed review on resubmission
they called it all over the place and allowed toemp to get ingame :/
intro song: creo - sky and soul
creo goat fr
7:03 Toned moment
Towers with 2020-era design: FAILURE
A tower that LITERALLY BREAKS THE NAMING SCHEME, and is ALSO SC+, which means HOW WOULD IT BE CANON, and it being added would mean A READJUSTMENT TO THE Z9 LOBBY, as in LITERALLY NEEDING A CHANGE TO BE IN THERE (The Off-White AKA TOW, Zone 9 SC area is currently 4 sides for each of the 4 main SC difficulties, so where would it be? Up? A seperate area?): ACTUALLY BEING CONSIDERED, AND THE SC+ PART IS CONFIRMED VIA A TRANSPARENT PART WITH HORRIFIC'S COLOUR ON TOP OF THE DIFFICULTY BOARD
play ToOFA and ToID in realm 4 atos and also play ToNN and ToBL in zone 9 ofc
state of jtoh:
- jukes can't even build purgatorio of it's liking 😂😂
- jukes is secretly sniffing vrchat harems
- biotech genesis should whitelist in Tower World
- prefers abuse of co based towers over semi-modern semi-classic towers
- curators only looks at tower design and decoration and barely looked at gameplay
- one curators distaste = you are dead! (as a tower submittor)
- Curators who denied of this submission (or deconfirmed) thinks ToOG:Unleashed is way better than *(Your Tower)*
Bro nothing is worse than THAT tower
Outside of gameplay
It seemed well made
Which sucks because…
WHY WOULD YOU MAKE THAT
I stopped like 2 minutes in to a video going through it
Whoever made ToOG deserves a public shaming, I rather play Citadel of Inception (ToI as a citadel) 10 times in a row then even play ToOG for a nanosecond. ToOG made every other NSFW artist look like a saint. It’s that bad.
last one is because it is 😼
@anotherstreamy The creator of towers like Tower of Super Stupid Security Systems, Citadel of Quadrilaterals and Steeple of Pumpkin Panic made Tower of Ooey Gooey. Have fun playing those towers! : )
@@an0nymousjtoh Doesn’t mean the creator’s horrible means the creation’s horrible, also ToSSSS was alright
GOAT of jtoh
nice typewriter
🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥
I aint seeing any actual “Frame” of the tower
Nahhh this crazy lmao
Yo man, do you mind sharing the game link? Honestly the tower seems decent😊
Thx for the reminder ill put it up and pin it :)
i cant believe tooe failed im going insane
toso song so this is the best video
gg eols
Fire
10:44
8:30 critical strike!!!
add toof into pa
the opposite of yes
no
a
non
daiorg ripoff
Pin pls ur da best
no
no