India should forward all Pakistanis To Not So Great Britain, since Britain wanted Pakistan so badly. That should give in the refugees space to return to their homelands
@@Spittingfact481 Refugees settle in the first safe country and economic migrants shop around for the country with best social welfare and easy laws to manipulate
The basic question to be asked is not what is being done about the refugees, but how and why these refugees are created. What is the global community doing to prevent that? No country is obliged to receive any refugee, but many do receive them on humanitarian grounds. But, of late, this 'business' has become a new threat to their own internal security.
Yes let's! 👍🏾🤓 And when we get to the "bottom" of this.. we'll be knee deep in history and find out many (not all) of the countries overwhelmed by and complaining about refugees were the conquerors, war-mongers, theives and global meddlers who created the problems at the heart of the global "unrest" 🙂👍🏾👏🏾🙏🏾🌏💚
@@hajeevibes Agreed 100% it's not even countries. It's nepotism politicians and their businesses mates they are everywhere in each country who like to benefit from misleading people and making people fight with each other.
Europe had quite a few issues with crime and safety concerns over mass immigration especially around 2015, 2016 and I completely understand why countries like Britain are looking for a way out, I think this also played a big part in Brexit.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !! that's unfair
The issue of crime perpetrated by immigrants in Europe is blown out of proportion. Some of the cities with the worst crime rates are places that have very few immigrants such as Glasgow. The terrorist attacks that took place in 2015-2016 in Europe ( France & Belgium mainly) weren't caused by refugees but second and third-generation immigrants who were born and bred in Europe. These refugees are unfairly labelled as criminals and shipped to a developing country like Rwanda whereas Ukrainian refugees are welcomed with open arms thus exposing the racism embedded in the British government
@@mozartips LARGE MAJORITY of the brit population lives in England, the north is obviously too cold for most people. at least in Rwanda they are not gonna freeze
@@mozartips and this is why you need to control the population so you can can handle it, and don't forget, UK is already taking tens of thousands of Ukranian refugees cuz of Russia invasion (just like the rest of Europe). Prioritizing own Citizens > illegal immigrants. Why dont you take these "refugees" into your house.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !! isn't that hypocrisy ??
Deport them to their home country then?? why deport them to Rwanda?? that doesn't make any fucking sense .. but ofcourse they will find excuses for their evil deeds
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !! isn't that hypocrisy ??
Countries have a right to control migration. The ones going to Rwanda are economic migrants who came illegally. Yeah, Rwanda is deliberately inconvenient. It’s safe though.
Totally wrong many of these asylum claiments will be easily executed in Rwanda by the people they fear most their own governments. I don't think the Iranian general is going to last long in Rwanda were the state has weaker surveillance oversight of foreign operatives. Why give Ukrainian refugees special access when advocating a different policy for others. If this policy goes ahead then other countries will deport people to Afghanistan or North Korea.
Britian has NO obligation to take in these economic migrants. These ""refugees"" are African anyway, so why not send these economic migrants to Africa?? Shame on Palki for making this about Racism.
Stfu I only see Syrians and Iraq and Afghanistan or and Lybia people in them boats . You have ALL THE OBLIGATION TO TAKE CARE OF THEM PEOPLE. It's your country and its allies that destabilized these countries and today you want to act dumb .
@Surviving White Zaddy 3.0 ok so send only african refugees to rwanda or you don't want them either ? 🤣 politician of rwanda take them and you i bet not from rwanda or politician who rule any country
Everyone wants refuge but don't want to enter with legal process.. By this policy of UK, maybe other European nation like Denmark, Sweden, Germany and many more would take similar action to get reid of illegal immigrants.
Absolutely alot of Countries need to deport refugees. They can't afford to support refugees, they have their own citizens to take care of. Australians and New Zealand people are migrating to Canada and other safe Countries.
Illegal immigrants took over America long time ago, true American r cast aside (native American) , so today's American's majority of them all illegal immigrants from Europe.
@@tubro541 first people in America were the clovis people from what is now Russia over the frozen bering strait. Indians came from Asia later. Read a book before you speak
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !! isn't that hypocrisy ??
@@first2dollarman That is called business... morality and capitalism don't go hand in hand, atleast Trump didn't start a fresh war in the middle east or somewhere.. he is the first US president in over 20yrs not to start a fresh war... Obama started the one in Syria and Libya and orchestrated the coup in Ukraine which broke the country and we are seeing the continuation today
@@TsarOfRuss sorry to say British Empires proxy America is a curse to the world like its $. It is now promoting digital junk to mislead the young and naive.
The ones trying to get into the US from these latin countries are surely not escaping war are they? These are rightly economic migrants as the ones trying to reach the UK, taxpayers like myself refuse to fund them!
Why should Britain be responsible for people that illegally enter their country? It's literally not their fault or responsibility. They are not coming in legally.
Hey !!! I don't think Britain is Racist towards Refugees. They had always welcome refugees n asylum seekers ever since n integrating these foreigners into their country n made life for them very easy n fine.Yes it has always been like this. In this situation it just need to share the burden n plight of these refugees with other countries ,so I don't see any racism or discrimination with that when at the same time there are millions of these refugees,immigrants ,and assylum seekers living n benefiting in Britain.
We will allow all Rohingyas and they will create roits for 15 dollars. Also they will create slums. Then they will eat tax payers money freely and will ask for voting rights to become citizens to make India into Islamic ountry... Good luck India!
Exactly,we are full,we are a small island, coming from a SAFE country as in FRANCE in a digny illegally us not entering a country legally.This isn't racism it's a country that's had enough of illegal immigrants.why does India not take some in?? British taxpayers are no longer paying for migrants that are not in danger.We need to make room for genuine refugees from Ukraine.
@@juliehdodds4126 genuine :). Who decides that. Boris? Or Patel? UK and US destroy countries- no? What the history says? India has taken immigrants equal to the existing population of UK. AND DONT FORGET- WARS ARE CREATED BY AND FOR UK AND US. WHY OTHER COUNTRIES ACCEPT CONSEQUENCES? REMEMBER TONY BLAIR?
@@juliehdodds4126 America and Britain has been behaving like scavengers from centuries. China and Russia are giving them befitting reply. Its unfortunate that Ukraine citizens have to suffer but its because of the joker they have in Keiv
Come on Wion, it’s what he said, it’s a deterrent. If you want to have a better life you’re going to work at it, not just go to a country and assume that they’re gonna give you benefits, to the point where you don’t even wanna work anymore. You don’t like it, go somewhere else. It’s a deterrent. I am tired of seeing people take advantage of hard-working taxpayers.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
@@gbrown9694 Ukrainians aren't immigrants, they're refugees fleeing an active warzone. Ukrainians aren't also crossing the boarder illegally, they're invited. Illegal immigrants crossing the English channel from France, aren't refugees. They're fleeing a safe country for better benefits from the British government. You're not a refugee if you're fleeing from a safe country accommodating you with a place to stay.
@@gbrown9694 The biggest difference is the Ukrainians who go to the UK are mainly women and children and want to go back to Ukraine as soon as they can. They also follow the asylum process and laws. The people who are being deported enter the country illegally, are mainly young men with next to no connection to Britain and very different values to most British people, who never want to leave.
This was the whole point of Brexit, so that Britain or more specifically the English government would be able to do things like this without too much bother. This is just the tip of the ice berg. There is much more to come... The exposure will be a shock for many.
probably... I'm from the EU and I still don't understand what actually was the point of Brexit, they got nothing out of it except more border control and less human rights🤷
The problem with thi Muslims is that when they go to another country that doesn't belongs to them they don't respect the country's law,they want to bring there culture to the country that doesn't belongs to them,in that's not right.
People are starving in Rwanda, 38 percent of Rwandans are in extreme poverty. A constant threat from the people in Congo, makes it unsafe. If you think Rwanda is a Great place to live, than you can move their yourself! Germany, Denmark are going to do the same thing, with their refugees!
@@catherinegee1044 Its best to shut your mouth when you don't know what you're talking about. There is no "constant" thrats from Congo, Rwanda is the one with troops in Congo not the other way round hence why several congolese people are fleeing to Uganda.
@@catherinegee1044 people are starving everywhere. Schools are being shot up every month in the USA. Mass shooting are so common people stop reporting on them. Rwanda isn’t the safest place but it’s a lot better now than before. And now the UK wants to send criminals there.
@@catherinegee1044 Then stop coming to Europe and sort your own countries out! Sick of this bull, Britain is racist when ot had an empire, Britain is racist when it wants other countries to pull their weight and want to aid African countries in growing so they can stop hunger, and progress their countries.
Love this idea! Well done Priti Patel! We can't have this level of migration into the UK, it's not sustainable and more so it will deter channel crossing. I don't want my tax money going to these Golddiggers!
@@abhinashkumar3161 Everyone is crying because of illegal islamic ``refugees``. Blame game back and forth helping only illegal migrants. Root cause is muslims and we all should know that.
I don't understand why WION is complaining. Britain has every right to do so considering the influx of the "religion of piece" in Europe. GOOD MOVE BRITAIN and one small dislike for WION :)
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
After the way they went around plundering the rest of the world and disrupting societies, they have a moral obligation now to take refugees from poor African and Asian countries.
@@Ishantyagiofficial That is called politics. Every country would preach good and moral things to other but they will do what is good for them. Don't worry, India is also growing stronger and very soon India will start doing what is good for India irrespective of what other small small countries say :)
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
@@thaUnWavering How many Middle Eastern countries have taken Ukrainian refugees? How many Asian countries have taken Ukrainian refugees? Yet Europe and the UK are expected to take everyone else in. Enough is Enough. The difference is the UK are taking in women and children because the men stay and fight. The people coming to the UK in boats are mostly men and the women and children are left to fight. That's the difference.
I think this Policy is good. Don’t just make it to people who cross the border from France but also those who come through the airport who has a better life in their respective country should be returned to Uganda 🇺🇬 until they process their cases. It will deter those rich people Coming through airport and claiming asylum because they will have to go to Rwanda for processing.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !! isn't that hypocrisy ??
Rwanda have been advertising on the Arsenal Jersey with a phrase "VISIT RWANDA" At least the refugees for them have got the GOLDEN chance and Opportunity to visit Rwanda at a free cost.
I've got a better plan ! All murderers from the UK go to a Rwanda prison ! We will pay Rwanda to treat them like there own .. over here ot probably costs £150000 to look after a murderer a year ! Over there £1000.
Perhaps India can take them then? Most are economic refugees milking the soft immigration system the uk has and the benefits payouts, it’s about time uk woke up and looked after its own population first! The smuggling gangs promise these better life’s and free cash and housing in the uk that’s why all the world want to come here!
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
A country like India which is poor according to them ( as it had never colonised other countries and looted them for centuries) also have immigrants from Myanmar and Bangladesh. When India tried to cope with them these western countries critisized it. Now they're doing same . Hypocrites innit!
Please keep the self righteous lecture to yourself , we all know how “democratic” India is with its human rights abuses in occupied Kashmir and its discrimination of other religious minorities all over India , India leaning towards Russia when it’s Russia that invaded Ukraine and has committed war crimes , India is the last to shout foul!
An important point is missed.. space is being created for Ukranian refugees.. so the non-white refugees (those from Afghanistan, Syria, Libya etc) are shipped to Rwanda. So it is basically a racist policy.
Seeing as we bring race into it, why not culture and religion as well, why are these refugees not sent to Arab countries? European nations practice Roman/Dutch law not Sharia law, far better to have a refugee from a similar cultural and religious background that will obey your legal system isn't it?
@@Frog13799 If thats the case why didnt UK strike a deal with UAE, Qatar, Kuwait etc to deport these refugees. Why Rwanda? And before hinting that muslims should find refuge in muslim lands, did you search the majority religion of Rwanda? Its Christianity.
@@Frog13799 how do you know someone from Afghanistan running away from Taliban (which was allowed to takeover due to NATO running away) even applied to take refuge in the Gulf nations?
I'm a big fan of you Palki, but there's some misinformation in this report: 1. UK is not sending all refugees to Rwanda - there is still a route to legally apply for asylum status in the UK, which many are utilising. The people going to Rwanda have ignored those legal paths, and subsequently can't be trusted to respect our other laws. 2. If you are in France, you are not a refugee because you are in a safe country. Ironically, the only aspect of France that resembles a warzone are areas with a high concentration of people who were once welcomed as refugees. 3. Given the fact that people in France are not refugees, they must, in fact, be economic migrants. We have no want, need for, or necessity to take such people. If you look at employment rates in many of these communities, they do not help us economically and increase our poverty rates. 4. These economic migrants are funding people smugglers - I'm sure you don't support those gangs. 5. Also, refugees aren't here to "start a new life", that's an economic migrant. They should be here temporarily and be returned to their home country when conflict ends. Anybody suggesting that they should get to stay indefinitely are the prime reason why they're going to Rwanda. 6. And to put it as bluntly as possible - most of the economic migrants coming across the channel are fighting-aged, single men. They come from a hostile culture which is incompatible with ours. We have seen too many stories of these people raping, murdering and committing acts of terror to keep letting ourselves be fooled. On top of that, people from these backgrounds demonstrably fail in the UK. Their employment rate, crime rates and educational attainment costs us a fortune every year. We don't want them and we need them like a hole in the head. 7. Rwanda is a country more suited to their culture and economic position.
On this issue I disagree with WION for the following reasons. 1 There is really a case of human slavery and trafficking going on. Criminal and inhuman Maffia groups are in controle of this business. 2. Most people who come to Britain are economic migrants. This migrants borrow money to pay the maffia giving their families in country of origin as guarantee. However on arrival the first thing migrant people who ask for your help tell you is their rights, it is their way of life or no way. In other words beggars become choosers and your master too. Sociale tensions are building up in European countries who receive them. I really think this policy will open the eyes of those being used by the maffia.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !! isn't that hypocrisy ??
I don't see any racism here, I support Britains decision in this. Government accomodating them to 4-star hotels and providing all basic necessities including free health care and dental care yet most of them are not satisfied with the accommodation and food provided. even supporting all of them with every way possible. Yet asylum seekers migrating to the UK is becoming more and they're not asylum seeker they're economic migrants. Most of them I personally saw have money, wears expensive clothing and limited edition shoes. Maybe Rwanda is not well suited as England but I am sure it is safe and secure though.
From Ruwanda they can easily return to their countries which is in Africa. These refugees needs to return to their home countries at some point. 11 refugees? Cmon this report is turning a fart into a cannon boom.
To be fair, considering the UKs population size vs India. They take around 8 times as many Refugees per capita than India .... Maybe that's something you could mention too ?
India is the most racist country in the world. Look into their caste system. The only Indians who have worth are the middle and upper class ones with very light skin. The poor, dark skin ones are treated worse than colonialists used to treat African slaves. This STILL happens in India today. This woman claims to be a journalist so she knows these things.
We already have bangladeshi refugee muslim on top you know how they are having 4 children in a year and demanding jobs therefore india's hands are full
no, if anyone wan't to migrate to europe have only right if do it legaly by all laws, criminal past, documents and carefully sellected those who can assimilate to communities, find a job and not wellfare seekers
I disagree, Britain is going through an economical crisis just like the rest of the world, it's not fair to add stress to their economy or any other country for that matter just because of Britain's past atrocities. Granted, they have been helping immigrants from ALL countries for decades now (including my Caribbean family) and no one speaks of that just of the colonialism past. Sometimes the well does run dry!
Yes,me too disagree ,as I can recall,Britain with humble God fearing loving Queen helping other countries,and now Britain too going through hard days,asslum seekers be where you are,pray Matthew 7:7 awaiting to listen and hear,Amen thanks
@@shosbp7923 argh please then tell your Queen to give up all the mines in Africa that they are still raping and that are putting Africa in great debt no.1. So as an African it also concerns me that if these people are like everyone in these comments who basically referred to them as "thugs", then why the hell bring them to Africa? Because I'm guessing we deserve those "thugs" right? How about the world including Britain as a huge component of world politics start actually addressing why the immigrants even exist on such a large scale to begin with. You know why they won't because that means calling out their father the USA.
@@shounbube3419 the guy suffers from inferiority complex and he belongs to modi’s bjp these guys always feel inferior infront of white people; because British subjugated hindus for a long time
A country like India which is poor according to them ( as it had never colonised other countries and looted them for centuries) also have immigrants from Myanmar and Bangladesh. When India tried to cope with them these western countries critisized it. Now they're doing same . Hypocrites innit!
Very soon India will be in a position to governing Britain. The day will come soon. What will happen to you then? You may not be deported to India but to ...........
I would like to emphasize one thing in this video....Britain is deporting "Illegal immigrants" who are crossing through English Channel.....not the ones who come legally
The vastly overpopulated UK can take no more of this insanity, our once wonderful country is systematically being destroyed financially, culturally and ethnically. Absolutely deplorable.
And how many countries did you destroy? Did you not bomb Libya and turn it into a failed state? Did you not follow that criminal bush into Iraq for a war of aggression that has nothing to do with you? Chickens are coming home to roost.
@@AdSd100 Just because some questionable choices caused some terrible crimes in other countries doesn't mean that completely innocent people should have to deal with crimes and abuse from foreign people with support from the government
45 trillion dollars . A very important figure . This is the amount of money your ancestors stole from India . Give it back then talk about racism. So called great Britain. You are just thieves read your history first .
India's human rights policy is worse than Rwanda's... i see how they treat women like "things" there .. i see how police brutalise civillians like that are animals
Wion is great in bringing many things that western media don't, but this is totally biased. This is not at all racism nor inhumane but a great strategy to protect their country from illegal & economic migration. The question "why Rwanda/Africa and not west" has an inherent bias. Why do you consider certain countries inferior? What about the people living there? The fact that economic migrants looking for green pastures will be deterred by this action and only the genuine ones seeking asylum/saving their lives would choose the UK.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
What is racist about sending illegal immigrants away? Genuine refugees don't chuck away all their documentation before landing! I'm sure after a while they'll stop coming
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !! isn't that hypocrisy ??
10 000 crossed in dingies this year alone. Last year 40 000 They all are men from iran . Iraq. Syria. They all want a free house. And there's no end of them in sight. Its their new culture. They can stsy in france. France is not a war zone.
chill, wion is an indian comedy channel. just come here for the laughs & enjoy watching wion presenters talk & preach as though they have the monopoly of the truth.
The UK and mainland Europe allowed millions of Ukrainians to enter and they even fast tracked all asylum cases, but for the few hundred or few thousand other people who have black or brown skin they get deported or still have to wait years for their cases to go through.
Cause Ukrainians threatened by huge war in their country and most we see are women with kids. Most dark skinned that trying to come are man without proper documentation. Don't forget country needs take care of it's safety. Any small suspicion and you wait even longer.
UK did not fast track Ukrainians, the EU did. The UK were heavily criticised because they would not fast track them. Because there was no need for Ukrainians to leave Ukraine, only the east is at war, the rest of Ukraine isn't under attack. The Ukrainians are using it as an excuse to get a better standard of living on other countries
It's not my business what another country does with its refugees. I just don't want anymore coming here . At least not till the world cools down a little.
@@abhinashkumar3161 yes because Brits always have double-triple standards. More importantly their pet pass time and reason of wealth accumulation is nose poking and society/country destruction. If they didn't have colonisation wealth they would be on par with Bangladesh or Somalia
How do they always find pictures with children? The buses that arrive in my hometown are of full of young men. Also, just because someone has a child doesn't automatically make that someone a good person. At my partner university in Bochum, two female Chinese students were raped, one almost killed. The guy turned out be a married with children Iraqi asylum seeker (they got him with DNA). He and his family lived in a nearby refugee shelter. You can look it up, it was all over the news.
Maybe your British government criminals are deporting the people with children, and keeping the young men. It is not like they're giving them any fair hearings or due process.
Palki doesn't seem to understand the sheer amount of economic migration that flows into Britain. And the UK agreed to take Rwandan migrants as balance.
What’s wrong with Africa. It’s a rich country. But saying it’s racist is racist. It’s not up to Europe to take everyone poor people so you have more money take care of your own people.
The real question now is why should the UK take accept every single refugees/asylum seekers?..also when was the last time any other African nations have refugees from other countries?..🤷♂️
Take Uganda for example. Uganda is the largest refugee-hosting country in Africa, with over a million refugees, most of them from South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Burundi and Somalia. Kenya, Sudan, DRC and Ethiopia are also among the top refugee-hosting countries on the continent. Uganda, poor same size as the UK almost similar population can do that, take 1 million. what of the UK? 135000 are you serious? that not many at all. If you don't want refugees don't destabilise regions(UK and US invasion of Iraq created ISIS and taking out Gaddafi. Libya is not any better) but invest in infrastructure increase standards of living simple as that.
Please feel free to take the economic migrants in India Palki. I'm sure you'll love all the Middle-East and North-African Muslim migrants in India bringing "diversity" to India.... Prince Charles is also welcome to take the migrants into his palaces if he likes. My primary concern is the safety and welfare of British citizens.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !! isn't that hypocrisy ??
You know why wion is reporting like this? becoz these European countries critisized Indian for its law to cope with illegal immigrants but now ? What happened suddenly to UK?looks like you are another half knowledged fella for whom world is just EU ,USA , Russia and China.
Accurately and succinctly stated!!! I get so, SO tired of this pathetic argument with so called African “asylum seekers” in the US as well. It’s disgusting, like geez….have some dignity and accountability. SMH.
They lecture India on human rights what a great humanity they're showing. That too when they're responsible for refugee crisis along with u.s & Nato allies.
It's better that they start doing that coz these migrants have started contributing to demographic change( Muslim & african europe) n west being liberal and democratic is very important for the future of this world especially for woman to lead a better life with better rights.
@@Jonuskas That's even better I hope u.k faces the same things which they gave India divide and rule. Things India are facing from past 70yrs karma won't spare them.
@@shobhas9407 that's not fine at all coz I live in uk n I have better rights as a female here than I can in any Asian country , here i get fair treatment as a female n no one judges me about my personal life ..so I don't want these refugees to effect my future
a principle strategy of these migrants is to burn their passports (or they do not have a passport) so the UK Government can't send them back to their country of origin.
Dear Won, I have your concerns. Though Britain keeps poking their nose in our internal matters but Britain has every right to do whatever they want to do in their country. - an Indian.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !! isn't that hypocrisy ??
I fully support Britain in this case, but if India do this same then they shouldn't object it. As simple as that.
Entire world will? You can't question them so dont answer them . Move forward.
Your right and India can't feed their own people, so they have to deport refugees also.
No disagree! Not this way. We need to find a way to stop them coming over
New people smuggling
New way of selling people
India should sign similar rule to Afghanistan or Iraq. Many would love to live "peacefully" and ideologically there
35 carore jamati sambhal jaaye wohi india ke liye kaafi hoga.
there is no Iraqi refugees in India, your country is stink. come to Iraq you will see hundreds thousands Indian workers.
@@sanjaydesai7594 uska matalb hai ki yahan ke peacefull community ko Iraq ya afghanistan deport karna chaiye
India should forward all Pakistanis To Not So Great Britain, since Britain wanted Pakistan so badly.
That should give in the refugees space to return to their homelands
good idea.
THEY'RE NOT REFUGEES THEY'RE ECONOMIC MIGRANTS
Economic migrants 🤔🤔🤔🤔 how
@@Spittingfact481 Because they were safe in France.
@@Spittingfact481 Refugees settle in the first safe country and economic migrants shop around for the country with best social welfare and easy laws to manipulate
Exactly 💯
@@Spittingfact481 they are mostly young fighting men who throw their identities in the sea. They should stay in France !!!
The basic question to be asked is not what is being done about the refugees, but how and why these refugees are created. What is the global community doing to prevent that? No country is obliged to receive any refugee, but many do receive them on humanitarian grounds. But, of late, this 'business' has become a new threat to their own internal security.
They could stay in France. But france wont give them a free house. Thats why they come here. Enough is enough. They are forcing themselves on us.
you mean welfare seekers and tourist or refugees ? real refugees go to country next to them, not thousand milles crossing 30 safe country borders
People import-export business and Indian corporate Rajas with investment banking background in Westminster is not a good sign for the people.
Yes let's! 👍🏾🤓 And when we get to the "bottom" of this.. we'll be knee deep in history and find out many (not all) of the countries overwhelmed by and complaining about refugees were the conquerors, war-mongers, theives and global meddlers who created the problems at the heart of the global "unrest" 🙂👍🏾👏🏾🙏🏾🌏💚
@@hajeevibes Agreed 100% it's not even countries. It's nepotism politicians and their businesses mates they are everywhere in each country who like to benefit from misleading people and making people fight with each other.
Europe had quite a few issues with crime and safety concerns over mass immigration especially around 2015, 2016 and I completely understand why countries like Britain are looking for a way out, I think this also played a big part in Brexit.
right
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
that's unfair
@@Ishantyagiofficial true
The issue of crime perpetrated by immigrants in Europe is blown out of proportion. Some of the cities with the worst crime rates are places that have very few immigrants such as Glasgow. The terrorist attacks that took place in 2015-2016 in Europe ( France & Belgium mainly) weren't caused by refugees but second and third-generation immigrants who were born and bred in Europe. These refugees are unfairly labelled as criminals and shipped to a developing country like Rwanda whereas Ukrainian refugees are welcomed with open arms thus exposing the racism embedded in the British government
She said the same country 100x in a 100 wayz lol
Most of them are not refugee or asylum seeker , economic migrant they are
Yes that´s big difference they sucking western generosity.
Correct bro 100 percent
undoubtedly
welfare migrants
Britain is quite small and already very populated
I want to see britain collapse its my dream
It's P5 member knows how to loot money
Rwanda is also a highly densely populated country
@@mozartips LARGE MAJORITY of the brit population lives in England, the north is obviously too cold for most people. at least in Rwanda they are not gonna freeze
@@mozartips and this is why you need to control the population so you can can handle it, and don't forget, UK is already taking tens of thousands of Ukranian refugees cuz of Russia invasion (just like the rest of Europe). Prioritizing own Citizens > illegal immigrants. Why dont you take these "refugees" into your house.
Their nation their rules..
Rules of chicken pox-blankets ???
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
isn't that hypocrisy ??
@@Ishantyagiofficial refugees and asylum seekers are two different things.
I wish they would give us (African countries) the exact same grace.
@@Vellonary oh can u plz elaborate the difference?
Brits come first in UK. Thanks for prioritizing your citizens. Any country can do it
this is right.
Deport them to their home country then?? why deport them to Rwanda?? that doesn't make any fucking sense .. but ofcourse they will find excuses for their evil deeds
Correct, nothing wrong
Phrase it right WHITE BRITS COME FIRST. As Boris does not class black people and ethic as brits, Boris is not a British
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
isn't that hypocrisy ??
Countries have a right to control migration. The ones going to Rwanda are economic migrants who came illegally. Yeah, Rwanda is deliberately inconvenient. It’s safe though.
It is not safe but deliberately convenient yes!
@@hizbawiginbarginbarghinda3872 why isn`t it safe? Rwanda is the 6th safest country for foreign travellers
It's landlocked.....at least they won't drown trying to move elsewhere.
Rwanda is not safe, the Congo people are attacking them right now.
Totally wrong many of these asylum claiments will be easily executed in Rwanda by the people they fear most their own governments. I don't think the Iranian general is going to last long in Rwanda were the state has weaker surveillance oversight of foreign operatives. Why give Ukrainian refugees special access when advocating a different policy for others. If this policy goes ahead then other countries will deport people to Afghanistan or North Korea.
Britian has NO obligation to take in these economic migrants. These ""refugees"" are African anyway, so why not send these economic migrants to Africa?? Shame on Palki for making this about Racism.
Stfu I only see Syrians and Iraq and Afghanistan or and Lybia people in them boats . You have ALL THE OBLIGATION TO TAKE CARE OF THEM PEOPLE. It's your country and its allies that destabilized these countries and today you want to act dumb .
Didn't they colonise some African countries and looted them
@@strauss7151 , And this is the same britian talking about Human Rights for Ukraine just to keep their Daddy US happy
Really how many % are African or Middleton east is Africa
@@strauss7151 yes, People don't understand this small difference. They keep on crying over Russia, they're just CONQUERING.
There is a lot of poor people in England-- England has more than enough of its own problem-- the country is already over population.
LOL ^^^^^
Tell England to stop stealing in Africa.
Then why was the borders thrown open for Ukrainian refugees recently
England has trillions worth stolen money from around the world. How come poor exists in such developed country
@Carpe Diem It's free for everyone!
Palki should take these refugees to her house.
😆😆😆
@Surviving White Zaddy 3.0 rwanda need diversity
Unintelligent joke. Ever heard of "emotional-empathy"? It's a trait that REAL humans have, and prevents us from becoming monsters.
@Surviving White Zaddy 3.0 nobody go to your so called country, rwanda just take care of refugees and rwanda need diversity
@Surviving White Zaddy 3.0 ok so send only african refugees to rwanda or you don't want them either ? 🤣 politician of rwanda take them and you i bet not from rwanda or politician who rule any country
Everyone wants refuge but don't want to enter with legal process.. By this policy of UK, maybe other European nation like Denmark, Sweden, Germany and many more would take similar action to get reid of illegal immigrants.
A final solution is to make better deals with other countries so people won’t need to leave for Europe
it looks like mindlessly spewing ignorance is far more common among Europeans than anywhere else.
So they will send them all to Africa and dispatch them .
Absolutely alot of Countries need to deport refugees. They can't afford to support refugees, they have their own citizens to take care of. Australians and New Zealand people are migrating to Canada and other safe Countries.
As an American (and Mexican too), I wouldn’t want illegal immigrants either lmao
LOL ^^^
No one does, and its fine but then britain shouldnt preach to others about keeping immigrants.
I don't blame you. North America is very vastly overpopulated with illegal immigrants from Europe.😢
Illegal immigrants took over America long time ago, true American r cast aside (native American) , so today's American's majority of them all illegal immigrants from Europe.
@@tubro541 first people in America were the clovis people from what is now Russia over the frozen bering strait. Indians came from Asia later. Read a book before you speak
"Racist" 🤣 WION jumped on the everything is racist trend. Pathetic.
Let the Muslims deal with India I'm unsubscribing them
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
isn't that hypocrisy ??
@@Ishantyagiofficial Nobody in the west really cares about anything in Asia except for China, Japan and South Korea.
Excellent Britain..keep it up.
keep what up??
Same people who criticised Trump for his refugee policies
Trump's family made money with favourable deals from politicians by inflating residential property prices. He is part of the problem.
@@first2dollarman That is called business... morality and capitalism don't go hand in hand, atleast Trump didn't start a fresh war in the middle east or somewhere.. he is the first US president in over 20yrs not to start a fresh war... Obama started the one in Syria and Libya and orchestrated the coup in Ukraine which broke the country and we are seeing the continuation today
@@TsarOfRuss sorry to say British Empires proxy America is a curse to the world like its $. It is now promoting digital junk to mislead the young and naive.
They all have PhD in hypocrisy and double standard
same with india, they also criticise India for refugee rules
Wion narrative is making no sense in this report
It’s not racism! It’s about maintaining the nation’s sovereignty
Yup that's Racism
Say what , chicken pox blankets ;; XD ^^^
That true, the media is playing the game of race to get TRP...
Americans, New Zealanders , Australians , South Africans , ' Where do they come from ./???
You should maintain your integrity by not making dogshit comments
Pure genius! I wish the same plan was initiated here in the US.
IMPERIALIST STATE SOON RUSSIA WILL BOMB YOU
The ones trying to get into the US from these latin countries are surely not escaping war are they? These are rightly economic migrants as the ones trying to reach the UK, taxpayers like myself refuse to fund them!
In the USA we should ship em to Uruguay and Argentina and Chile
@@realist3351 All of them are Turk tribes!
@FM they are all a bunch of deluded twats! I'm fed up with people taking advantage and it's got to stop!
Why should Britain be responsible for people that illegally enter their country? It's literally not their fault or responsibility. They are not coming in legally.
All refugees of this word should send in Pakistan
😂😂😂
Hey !!! I don't think Britain is Racist towards Refugees.
They had always welcome refugees n asylum seekers ever since n integrating these foreigners into their country n made life for them very easy n fine.Yes it has always been like this.
In this situation it just need to share the burden n plight of these refugees with other countries ,so I don't see any racism or discrimination with that when at the same time there are millions of these refugees,immigrants ,and assylum seekers living n benefiting in Britain.
I couldn't say any better, very well spoken 👏
You have not live in England, the white British people are extremely predjudice
What is India's migration policy?
Keep out.
We don't have enough space 😅😅
Our opposition settles the illegal immigrants in the greed of votes.
Ask millions of rohingyas
We will allow all Rohingyas and they will create roits for 15 dollars. Also they will create slums. Then they will eat tax payers money freely and will ask for voting rights to become citizens to make India into Islamic ountry... Good luck India!
Sounds like a Great Plan for Canada to get on board with !
Canada will keep taking refugees and new Immigrants. As long as Justin Trudeau is the Prime Minister!
But Canada's under populated tho?
@@True-yj3ur under populated doesn't mean that it's good to receive anyone. Your crime rate & terrorism & unemployment will rise if you do that.
@@EroBotan True ❤
Canada needs more Indian cleaners
How is this racist ,, most Brits would Iove to be sent abroad to a nice hotel ,, do you all not realise this is a bloody island and only so big !!!!
Indeed- a bloody clumsy island that needs to be ripped apart as it has been doing to other nations
Exactly,we are full,we are a small island, coming from a SAFE country as in FRANCE in a digny illegally us not entering a country legally.This isn't racism it's a country that's had enough of illegal immigrants.why does India not take some in?? British taxpayers are no longer paying for migrants that are not in danger.We need to make room for genuine refugees from Ukraine.
@@juliehdodds4126 genuine :). Who decides that. Boris? Or Patel? UK and US destroy countries- no? What the history says? India has taken immigrants equal to the existing population of UK. AND DONT FORGET- WARS ARE CREATED BY AND FOR UK AND US. WHY OTHER COUNTRIES ACCEPT CONSEQUENCES? REMEMBER TONY BLAIR?
I think they're just mad they wouldnt be given as much money and a house and first world healthcare for free.
@@juliehdodds4126 America and Britain has been behaving like scavengers from centuries. China and Russia are giving them befitting reply. Its unfortunate that Ukraine citizens have to suffer but its because of the joker they have in Keiv
We cheer Brittan.
Britain for whites
Come on Wion, it’s what he said, it’s a deterrent. If you want to have a better life you’re going to work at it, not just go to a country and assume that they’re gonna give you benefits, to the point where you don’t even wanna work anymore. You don’t like it, go somewhere else. It’s a deterrent. I am tired of seeing people take advantage of hard-working taxpayers.
Same is with Ukraine. Let them fight on their strength. Stop finding their wars.
So says the country that has looted the world for it's own gain!!
Agreed. This report is BS. WION is definitely carrying hatred for the UK. The bias is so ridiculously obvious.
@@shreyjain535 best answer ever, thanks
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
good work UK.
How’s it racist? The policy applies to all immigrants regardless of colour
Like the Ukrainians?
@@gbrown9694 Ukrainians aren't immigrants, they're refugees fleeing an active warzone. Ukrainians aren't also crossing the boarder illegally, they're invited. Illegal immigrants crossing the English channel from France, aren't refugees. They're fleeing a safe country for better benefits from the British government. You're not a refugee if you're fleeing from a safe country accommodating you with a place to stay.
@@ethanragbir8311 Yes, great to be invited isn't it. Wonder why they were welcomed with open arms and others have not.
@@gbrown9694 there's other countries in Africa they can migrate too. Not just England
@@gbrown9694 The biggest difference is the Ukrainians who go to the UK are mainly women and children and want to go back to Ukraine as soon as they can. They also follow the asylum process and laws. The people who are being deported enter the country illegally, are mainly young men with next to no connection to Britain and very different values to most British people, who never want to leave.
This was the whole point of Brexit, so that Britain or more specifically the English government would be able to do things like this without too much bother. This is just the tip of the ice berg. There is much more to come... The exposure will be a shock for many.
probably... I'm from the EU and I still don't understand what actually was the point of Brexit, they got nothing out of it except more border control and less human rights🤷
@@guccikip3055 border patrol. They don't want anyone else in. That's the whole point.
@@guccikip3055 You don't understand because you are ignorant.
Great Brexit....is doing what people voted for
The "English" don't have their own government. You're confused.
How is it racist to protect your borders?
Taking only white men is
Everything is racist nowadays.
But Britain cry about human rights when same steps taken by India regarding illegal muslim migrants from Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afganistan
None you guys are doing the right thing 👏
The problem with thi Muslims is that when they go to another country that doesn't belongs to them they don't respect the country's law,they want to bring there culture to the country that doesn't belongs to them,in that's not right.
For the record Rwanda has made itself to one of the cleanest and safest countries in Africa. Yes they had a rough past but that is no longer the case
People are starving in Rwanda, 38 percent of Rwandans are in extreme poverty. A constant threat from the people in Congo, makes it unsafe. If you think Rwanda is a Great place to live, than you can move their yourself! Germany, Denmark are going to do the same thing, with their refugees!
@@catherinegee1044 Its best to shut your mouth when you don't know what you're talking about. There is no "constant" thrats from Congo, Rwanda is the one with troops in Congo not the other way round hence why several congolese people are fleeing to Uganda.
@@catherinegee1044 people are starving everywhere. Schools are being shot up every month in the USA. Mass shooting are so common people stop reporting on them. Rwanda isn’t the safest place but it’s a lot better now than before. And now the UK wants to send criminals there.
@@catherinegee1044 oh well, take them to your home them !
@@catherinegee1044 Then stop coming to Europe and sort your own countries out! Sick of this bull, Britain is racist when ot had an empire, Britain is racist when it wants other countries to pull their weight and want to aid African countries in growing so they can stop hunger, and progress their countries.
Love this idea! Well done Priti Patel! We can't have this level of migration into the UK, it's not sustainable and more so it will deter channel crossing. I don't want my tax money going to these Golddiggers!
Coward!!!
Your wealth came from Africa. So your taxes are African money.
England and alot of Countries can;t afford to support refugees
No it's not racist. Let Europe deal with European refugees. Let Africa deal with Africans
Send them to India.. Palki will be delighted
Yes palki avatar feeding them with her thousand of udders.
But Britain cry about human rights when same steps taken by India regarding illegal muslim migrants from Bangladesh, Rohingya
@@abhinashkumar3161 Everyone is crying because of illegal islamic ``refugees``. Blame game back and forth helping only illegal migrants. Root cause is muslims and we all should know that.
I don't understand why WION is complaining. Britain has every right to do so considering the influx of the "religion of piece" in Europe. GOOD MOVE BRITAIN and one small dislike for WION :)
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
If similar policy adopted by India. Us,UK and EU are the 1st to criticize why hypocrisy? 🤔
True... its upto your citizens to accept. If you think they are violent, you have every right to deny refugee.
After the way they went around plundering the rest of the world and disrupting societies, they have a moral obligation now to take refugees from poor African and Asian countries.
@@Ishantyagiofficial That is called politics. Every country would preach good and moral things to other but they will do what is good for them. Don't worry, India is also growing stronger and very soon India will start doing what is good for India irrespective of what other small small countries say :)
EVERY NATION, INCLUDING INDIA, HAS A RIGHT TO DECIDE WHO THEY LET IN AND PROTECT ITS HERITAGE.
We've got enough every country should be responsible for their own.
Exactly
so you would turn away Ukranians?
@@thaUnWaveringa lot of people from Ukraine are already in America but that going to take a lot of countries to help out since millions left Ukraine.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
@@thaUnWavering
How many Middle Eastern countries have taken Ukrainian refugees?
How many Asian countries have taken Ukrainian refugees?
Yet Europe and the UK are expected to take everyone else in. Enough is Enough. The difference is the UK are taking in women and children because the men stay and fight.
The people coming to the UK in boats are mostly men and the women and children are left to fight.
That's the difference.
I think this Policy is good. Don’t just make it to people who cross the border from France but also those who come through the airport who has a better life in their respective country should be returned to Uganda 🇺🇬 until they process their cases. It will deter those rich people Coming through airport and claiming asylum because they will have to go to Rwanda for processing.
Every country has right to decide who they want to keep or not..simple
This is in no way racism. Incorrect reporting.
Not only incorrect reporting, but some of the most lazy journalism I have ever encountered
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
isn't that hypocrisy ??
@@Ishantyagiofficial India takes it to a new level the hatred and bigotry towards others.
@@slidebay These people are like this. Even news channels in India are like this, sensationalist fueling divides.
Incorrect reporting? Wion makes a living out of it.
If racist means looking after our British citizens then so be it.
You left the word illegal out of your question.
Good he has every right to do so
Rwanda have been advertising on the Arsenal Jersey with a phrase "VISIT RWANDA" At least the refugees for them have got the GOLDEN chance and Opportunity to visit Rwanda at a free cost.
They are right. These people have created lots of problem in the country.
UK has been doing such things in their history
An example is that: Europeans criminals are transferred to the island of 🇦🇺 in the 16th century
Please take a homeless in your house, then talk snowflake.
Not only in the islands but the US, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, central and South America, etc.
400 years ago…
They stole 45 trillion dollar from india killed thousands of indian , starved them to deatg . And now they are flagbearers of humanrights and racism.
@@kiwi36O even now!
I've got a better plan ! All murderers from the UK go to a Rwanda prison ! We will pay Rwanda to treat them like there own .. over here ot probably costs £150000 to look after a murderer a year ! Over there £1000.
Perhaps India can take them then?
Most are economic refugees milking the soft immigration system the uk has and the benefits payouts, it’s about time uk woke up and looked after its own population first! The smuggling gangs promise these better life’s and free cash and housing in the uk that’s why all the world want to come here!
Perhaps you can give back our 45 trillion dollars that your ancestors took out of india in 200 years . So called great britain.
I agree let asia take in asians and Africans can go to Africa
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
A country like India which is poor according to them ( as it had never colonised other countries and looted them for centuries) also have immigrants from Myanmar and Bangladesh. When India tried to cope with them these western countries critisized it. Now they're doing same . Hypocrites innit!
Please keep the self righteous lecture to yourself , we all know how “democratic” India is with its human rights abuses in occupied Kashmir and its discrimination of other religious minorities all over India , India leaning towards Russia when it’s Russia that invaded Ukraine and has committed war crimes , India is the last to shout foul!
An important point is missed.. space is being created for Ukranian refugees.. so the non-white refugees (those from Afghanistan, Syria, Libya etc) are shipped to Rwanda. So it is basically a racist policy.
Seeing as we bring race into it, why not culture and religion as well, why are these refugees not sent to Arab countries? European nations practice Roman/Dutch law not Sharia law, far better to have a refugee from a similar cultural and religious background that will obey your legal system isn't it?
@@Frog13799 If thats the case why didnt UK strike a deal with UAE, Qatar, Kuwait etc to deport these refugees. Why Rwanda? And before hinting that muslims should find refuge in muslim lands, did you search the majority religion of Rwanda? Its Christianity.
@@muditragrawal that's the point, those nations refused to take the refugees initially.
@@Frog13799 how do you know someone from Afghanistan running away from Taliban (which was allowed to takeover due to NATO running away) even applied to take refuge in the Gulf nations?
I'm a big fan of you Palki, but there's some misinformation in this report:
1. UK is not sending all refugees to Rwanda - there is still a route to legally apply for asylum status in the UK, which many are utilising. The people going to Rwanda have ignored those legal paths, and subsequently can't be trusted to respect our other laws.
2. If you are in France, you are not a refugee because you are in a safe country. Ironically, the only aspect of France that resembles a warzone are areas with a high concentration of people who were once welcomed as refugees.
3. Given the fact that people in France are not refugees, they must, in fact, be economic migrants. We have no want, need for, or necessity to take such people. If you look at employment rates in many of these communities, they do not help us economically and increase our poverty rates.
4. These economic migrants are funding people smugglers - I'm sure you don't support those gangs.
5. Also, refugees aren't here to "start a new life", that's an economic migrant. They should be here temporarily and be returned to their home country when conflict ends. Anybody suggesting that they should get to stay indefinitely are the prime reason why they're going to Rwanda.
6. And to put it as bluntly as possible - most of the economic migrants coming across the channel are fighting-aged, single men. They come from a hostile culture which is incompatible with ours. We have seen too many stories of these people raping, murdering and committing acts of terror to keep letting ourselves be fooled. On top of that, people from these backgrounds demonstrably fail in the UK. Their employment rate, crime rates and educational attainment costs us a fortune every year. We don't want them and we need them like a hole in the head.
7. Rwanda is a country more suited to their culture and economic position.
They are not refugees!!!
Love it, hope United States does this too
On this issue I disagree with WION for the following reasons. 1 There is really a case of human slavery and trafficking going on. Criminal and inhuman Maffia groups are in controle of this business. 2. Most people who come to Britain are economic migrants. This migrants borrow money to pay the maffia giving their families in country of origin as guarantee. However on arrival the first thing migrant people who ask for your help tell you is their rights, it is their way of life or no way. In other words beggars become choosers and your master too. Sociale tensions are building up in European countries who receive them. I really think this policy will open the eyes of those being used by the maffia.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
isn't that hypocrisy ??
I am so glad I left England
Agree with Britain a country needs to protect its people and country can't have people coming and settling in illegal way
Lol why they allow pakistani refugee
India should do the same with Rohingyas
Who are Rohingyas?? and what’s the problem you have with them
Am a Zambian TH-camr saying that here in Africa we live together with everyone, its safe, and very good here
I don't see any racism here, I support Britains decision in this. Government accomodating them to 4-star hotels and providing all basic necessities including free health care and dental care yet most of them are not satisfied with the accommodation and food provided. even supporting all of them with every way possible. Yet asylum seekers migrating to the UK is becoming more and they're not asylum seeker they're economic migrants. Most of them I personally saw have money, wears expensive clothing and limited edition shoes. Maybe Rwanda is not well suited as England but I am sure it is safe and secure though.
From Ruwanda they can easily return to their countries which is in Africa. These refugees needs to return to their home countries at some point. 11 refugees? Cmon this report is turning a fart into a cannon boom.
What about those from the middle east?
Its about time refugees to Rwanda priti Patel should keep her promise
These are economic migrants NOT refugees. They want work, Rwanda needs workers
sending them to Rwanda is a death sentence why don't you go to Rwanda with no money or anything if it's great
Oh Ms Palki. You really have not done your research on this one…..!
To be fair, considering the UKs population size vs India. They take around 8 times as many Refugees per capita than India .... Maybe that's something you could mention too ?
Refugees don't come to India. It isn't like Indian borders are sealed or India dumps refugees.
@FM with a population such as India's that is barely a drop in the ocean.
@@user-tq1sp5ly9l it's a drop of poison
India has taken millions of Bangladeshi refugees but your media is always the first one to criticize us
RACISM, RACISM
Why India does not accept these people ?
India is the most racist country in the world. Look into their caste system. The only Indians who have worth are the middle and upper class ones with very light skin. The poor, dark skin ones are treated worse than colonialists used to treat African slaves. This STILL happens in India today. This woman claims to be a journalist so she knows these things.
A good question. Maybe India was not asked and certainly won't do it for cash.
We already have bangladeshi refugee muslim on top you know how they are having 4 children in a year and demanding jobs therefore india's hands are full
We r already done with the bangladesh..is
Because india doesn't have anything to give ,can you see how many Indians are in the UK? Why you think this Indians don't go back to India?
You're right European countries wouldn't accept them so easy 🤦🏽♂️
They need room for Ukrainian refugees, these black people gotta go!
no, if anyone wan't to migrate to europe have only right if do it legaly by all laws, criminal past, documents and carefully sellected those who can assimilate to communities, find a job and not wellfare seekers
It's not their countries. They're landstealers
@@LilySteph1949 what countries ?
its not their country in first place how hard is it to understand?
I disagree, Britain is going through an economical crisis just like the rest of the world, it's not fair to add stress to their economy or any other country for that matter just because of Britain's past atrocities. Granted, they have been helping immigrants from ALL countries for decades now (including my Caribbean family) and no one speaks of that just of the colonialism past. Sometimes the well does run dry!
@@monkeyonthecar9777 Happy to see that someone accepts that British government is dumping ISIS/ pedophiles/ criminals to poor Rwanda.
Yes,me too disagree ,as I can recall,Britain with humble God fearing loving Queen helping other countries,and now Britain too going through hard days,asslum seekers be where you are,pray Matthew 7:7 awaiting to listen and hear,Amen thanks
@@shosbp7923 argh please then tell your Queen to give up all the mines in Africa that they are still raping and that are putting Africa in great debt no.1. So as an African it also concerns me that if these people are like everyone in these comments who basically referred to them as "thugs", then why the hell bring them to Africa? Because I'm guessing we deserve those "thugs" right? How about the world including Britain as a huge component of world politics start actually addressing why the immigrants even exist on such a large scale to begin with. You know why they won't because that means calling out their father the USA.
All European countries must follow Britain if the refugee is muslim
Respect yourself pajeet; your worth 10 rupees; I can hire you to clean my toilet for 5 rupees
Why Muslims
@@shounbube3419 Because he tries to appease his white masters by showing them how submissive he is to white colonialism
@@shounbube3419 the guy suffers from inferiority complex and he belongs to modi’s bjp these guys always feel inferior infront of white people; because British subjugated hindus for a long time
Why not to India? Ship them right to WION and their employee's homes.
A country like India which is poor according to them ( as it had never colonised other countries and looted them for centuries) also have immigrants from Myanmar and Bangladesh. When India tried to cope with them these western countries critisized it. Now they're doing same . Hypocrites innit!
Very soon India will be in a position to governing Britain. The day will come soon. What will happen to you then? You may not be deported to India but to ...........
Just look how many indias are in the UK 🇬🇧 when I came into UK I thought I was in India 😆
@@lazaropeedro8881 but they are enhancing your economy!! It is surveyed that indians are the richest immigrant in uk and usa specially hindus
@@iotasymbol8498 I won't be surprised
I would like to emphasize one thing in this video....Britain is deporting "Illegal immigrants" who are crossing through English Channel.....not the ones who come legally
The vastly overpopulated UK can take no more of this insanity, our once wonderful country is systematically being destroyed financially, culturally and ethnically. Absolutely deplorable.
And how many countries did you destroy? Did you not bomb Libya and turn it into a failed state? Did you not follow that criminal bush into Iraq for a war of aggression that has nothing to do with you? Chickens are coming home to roost.
Deserved
@@AdSd100 Just because some questionable choices caused some
terrible crimes in other countries doesn't mean that completely innocent people should have to deal with crimes and abuse from foreign people with support from the government
Dont be racist Wion. Nothing wrong with Rwanda and India doesnt want them either. Britain admitted 100,000 Indians in 2019.
?????!!!!clown
45 trillion dollars . A very important figure . This is the amount of money your ancestors stole from India . Give it back then talk about racism. So called great Britain. You are just thieves read your history first .
India isn't developed, europe is.
Before speaking about first know the history of India. We have given refuge to everyone who have came to India.
@@संदिग्धप्राणी ......hmmmm
They should send them to India.
Why? We already are very populated. India have refugees from Tibet, Afghanistan, Myanmar, srilanka, Iran, Bangladesh.
India's human rights policy is worse than Rwanda's... i see how they treat women like "things" there .. i see how police brutalise civillians like that are animals
China is a good alternative destination too!
@@tanya3508 The journalist comes off very judgemental. I wonder what her sentiment would be if the refugees were being sent to her country
@@arenelomax the opposite.
Wion is great in bringing many things that western media don't, but this is totally biased. This is not at all racism nor inhumane but a great strategy to protect their country from illegal & economic migration. The question "why Rwanda/Africa and not west" has an inherent bias. Why do you consider certain countries inferior? What about the people living there? The fact that economic migrants looking for green pastures will be deterred by this action and only the genuine ones seeking asylum/saving their lives would choose the UK.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
You said it well . Some who really need a place to live will take this opportunity and even have a successful fresh start
While those people leave thier mother country to save their lives , i am happy to be born in India 🇮🇳❤️
😫😫
Ive always wondered “why do i have to let you in? Why is it my fault your country is at war?”
What is racist about sending illegal immigrants away? Genuine refugees don't chuck away all their documentation before landing! I'm sure after a while they'll stop coming
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
isn't that hypocrisy ??
@@Ishantyagiofficial tbh I couldn't care less what India does... I'm just glad we are now playing tough with illegal immigration
@@marcuscro8887 But Britain cry about human rights when same steps taken by India regarding illegal muslim migrants from Bangladesh, Rohingya
@@abhinashkumar3161 no, literally no. stop making up things.
10 000 crossed in dingies this year alone. Last year 40 000
They all are men from iran . Iraq. Syria. They all want a free house. And there's no end of them in sight. Its their new culture. They can stsy in france. France is not a war zone.
Lady everything is racist to you ! Take them to your house !! Problem solved !!!
chill, wion is an indian comedy channel. just come here for the laughs & enjoy watching wion presenters talk & preach as though they have the monopoly of the truth.
If it’s racist I’m sure India will take all these millions of people in. Actually India can take all the Indians in Britain back too.
The UK and mainland Europe allowed millions of Ukrainians to enter and they even fast tracked all asylum cases, but for the few hundred or few thousand other people who have black or brown skin they get deported or still have to wait years for their cases to go through.
Cause Ukrainians threatened by huge war in their country and most we see are women with kids. Most dark skinned that trying to come are man without proper documentation. Don't forget country needs take care of it's safety. Any small suspicion and you wait even longer.
UK did not fast track Ukrainians, the EU did. The UK were heavily criticised because they would not fast track them. Because there was no need for Ukrainians to leave Ukraine, only the east is at war, the rest of Ukraine isn't under attack. The Ukrainians are using it as an excuse to get a better standard of living on other countries
Could be worse for potential refugees, they could be sent to India.
It's not my business what another country does with its refugees.
I just don't want anymore coming here .
At least not till the world cools down a little.
Correct but it can happen only when UK stops poking their nose and ripping off other countries at the instructions of their US masters?
But Britain cry about human rights when same steps taken by India regarding illegal muslim migrants from Bangladesh, Rohingya
@@abhinashkumar3161 yes because Brits always have double-triple standards. More importantly their pet pass time and reason of wealth accumulation is nose poking and society/country destruction. If they didn't have colonisation wealth they would be on par with Bangladesh or Somalia
How do they always find pictures with children? The buses that arrive in my hometown are of full of young men.
Also, just because someone has a child doesn't automatically make that someone a good person.
At my partner university in Bochum, two female Chinese students were raped, one almost killed. The guy turned out be a married with children Iraqi asylum seeker (they got him with DNA). He and his family lived in a nearby refugee shelter.
You can look it up, it was all over the news.
Maybe your British government criminals are deporting the people with children, and keeping the young men. It is not like they're giving them any fair hearings or due process.
Palki doesn't seem to understand the sheer amount of economic migration that flows into Britain. And the UK agreed to take Rwandan migrants as balance.
But Britain cry about human rights when same steps taken by India regarding illegal muslim migrants from Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afganistan
But Ukrainians aren’t going to Ruwanda
Make sure the world hears this...they will stop coming here then.
Damn...lol.
It’s a tiny island- there’s only so much housing to go around people. A lot of these people aren’t even proper refugees.
What’s wrong with Africa. It’s a rich country. But saying it’s racist is racist. It’s not up to Europe to take everyone poor people so you have more money take care of your own people.
The real question now is why should the UK take accept every single refugees/asylum seekers?..also when was the last time any other African nations have refugees from other countries?..🤷♂️
Take Uganda for example. Uganda is the largest refugee-hosting country in Africa, with over a million refugees, most of them from South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Burundi and Somalia. Kenya, Sudan, DRC and Ethiopia are also among the top refugee-hosting countries on the continent.
Uganda, poor same size as the UK almost similar population can do that, take 1 million. what of the UK? 135000 are you serious? that not many at all.
If you don't want refugees don't destabilise regions(UK and US invasion of Iraq created ISIS and taking out Gaddafi. Libya is not any better) but invest in infrastructure increase standards of living simple as that.
Sounds good to me. Ship out the illegal immigrants. If they want to come here let them apply properly.
Please feel free to take the economic migrants in India Palki. I'm sure you'll love all the Middle-East and North-African Muslim migrants in India bringing "diversity" to India.... Prince Charles is also welcome to take the migrants into his palaces if he likes. My primary concern is the safety and welfare of British citizens.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
isn't that hypocrisy ??
I am an Indian and I agree. This is not racism. This is a big security threat and India is already facing it. Wion should not have done this.
You know why wion is reporting like this? becoz these European countries critisized Indian for its law to cope with illegal immigrants but now ? What happened suddenly to UK?looks like you are another half knowledged fella for whom world is just EU ,USA , Russia and China.
Also India is home to second largest Muslim population. So stfu!!!
@@a.k.1960 dude as you know India also have this situation but did they support us ? They just ruined the situation for us
Saving your country from unwanted people is not racism, we can't always play colonialism victim card and accuse britian of racism every time.
Accurately and succinctly stated!!! I get so, SO tired of this pathetic argument with so called African “asylum seekers” in the US as well. It’s disgusting, like geez….have some dignity and accountability. SMH.
They lecture India on human rights what a great humanity they're showing. That too when they're responsible for refugee crisis along with u.s & Nato allies.
It's better that they start doing that coz these migrants have started contributing to demographic change( Muslim & african europe) n west being liberal and democratic is very important for the future of this world especially for woman to lead a better life with better rights.
@@Jonuskas That's even better I hope u.k faces the same things which they gave India divide and rule. Things India are facing from past 70yrs karma won't spare them.
@@shobhas9407 that's not fine at all coz I live in uk n I have better rights as a female here than I can in any Asian country , here i get fair treatment as a female n no one judges me about my personal life ..so I don't want these refugees to effect my future
@@Jonuskas When bulls fight, crops suffer. People like you have to suffer for no reason.
@@shobhas9407 that's why this move is fair to avoid future crisis
I wholeheartedly support but imagine the migrants coming from Rwanda having to return lol😂
I had you say Rwanda has the worst humanitarian crisis.....you just wrong and need to do your homework well as a journalist
African politician will go after that money and accepted everyone as long they get the cash 😑
Sending them to Rwanda is still bizarre, even if it allegedly "saves money". Why not send them back to where they came from in the first place?
a principle strategy of these migrants is to burn their passports (or they do not have a passport) so the UK Government can't send them back to their country of origin.
Dear Won, I have your concerns. Though Britain keeps poking their nose in our internal matters but Britain has every right to do whatever they want to do in their country.
- an Indian.
but UK will be the first country to critisize on behalf of regugee rights if these kind of actions were taken by any asian country
all western country critisize India for deporting illegal refugee by law NRC by saying refugee also have human rights !!
isn't that hypocrisy ??
@@Ishantyagiofficial yes u r right. I hve said same too but with different words.