Russia's Boeing 757 Rival Tu-214 Will Deliver Next Year But Only With 3 Person Cockpit

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 702

  • @maestromecanico597
    @maestromecanico597 ปีที่แล้ว +261

    1000 domestically built aircraft by the end of the decade? Not too sure about that.

    • @АндроидКиткат
      @АндроидКиткат ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I think it includes general aviation. Total amount of russian aircraft is ~1300 pcs. Even though I don't think these plans are realistic.

    • @Sanyu-Tumusiime
      @Sanyu-Tumusiime ปีที่แล้ว +11

      It’s including everything like every small tiny craft too like Cessna types

    • @Sanyu-Tumusiime
      @Sanyu-Tumusiime ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s including everything like every small tiny craft too like Cessna types

    • @geksogen123
      @geksogen123 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      It’s including all Iranian drones they already fired 🤣🐒

    • @coyotelong4349
      @coyotelong4349 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      They’ll have to repurpose the engines from Iranian drones for these aircraft lol

  • @Sierra-Golf-19
    @Sierra-Golf-19 ปีที่แล้ว +175

    The biggest question still remains.
    Will any of these aircraft receive certification to fly outside of Russian friendly airspace?

    • @TDCflyer
      @TDCflyer ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Nope, never

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      Some already have

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      ​@@TDCflyerlol cope

    • @redbaron6805
      @redbaron6805 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bobsemple9341 Delusional clown....

    • @geo.m1639
      @geo.m1639 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Already have

  • @24Master
    @24Master ปีที่แล้ว +44

    This is not the only aircraft produced in Russia. There is Sukhoi Superjet and MC 21 300, and IL 96. USSR used to rely solely on it's own aircrafts. Now, Russia will do the same adding thousands of jobs.

    • @AUmarcus
      @AUmarcus ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Last time it relied on its own aircraft Aeroflop had one of the worst safety records in the world. 🤣👍

    • @rodjarrow6575
      @rodjarrow6575 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AUmarcus You are behind the times! Therefore, you quote the propaganda slogans of Dr. Goebbels!

    • @DanTDMJace
      @DanTDMJace ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@AUmarcusAir Koryo anyone? Only Tupolev/Antonov/Ilyushin aircraft for its entire operating life, and only one fatal incident.

    • @edthebumblingfool
      @edthebumblingfool 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      russia has plenty of jobs in its army the propbel is people with skills

    • @AUmarcus
      @AUmarcus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@edthebumblingfool
      Short term jobs. 👍

  • @TheDrono
    @TheDrono ปีที่แล้ว +102

    Tu-214 range;
    • Max commercial load of 25200kg: 3800km
    • Commercial load of 20760kg: 5200km
    • Commercial load of 11110kg: 7200km
    Max passenger carry is 210 people

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Impressive...for 1978...

    • @danielvanmook4318
      @danielvanmook4318 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@swanvictor887 Even more impressive is the 89 units made since 1990.

    • @imissyoubasile
      @imissyoubasile ปีที่แล้ว +32

      ​@danielvanmook4318 But hey, they can currently produce 10 airframes per year, amazing right 😅? And they could perhaps push that to 20 😂. Oh boy all this is laughable.

    • @timb4098
      @timb4098 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@swanvictor887The Tu-204 first flew in 1989.

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@timb4098....and it was already obsolete then too....

  • @SIG1911
    @SIG1911 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Fly-by-wire BUT 3 Person in Cockpit What kind of technology is this. Are they using Soviet computer or something?

    • @solracer66
      @solracer66 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Yes and his name is Ivan…

    • @AirShark95
      @AirShark95 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      Using low grade microchips from washing machines stolen in Ukraine 😂

    • @celebrityrog
      @celebrityrog ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @@AirShark95 Wait till they get to the SPIN CYCLE.

    • @AirShark95
      @AirShark95 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@celebrityrog TU-214 proceeds to spin out of the sky...

    • @tallmansfavorites7563
      @tallmansfavorites7563 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Pilot, Co pilot, and vodka shots technician

  • @bastarddoggy
    @bastarddoggy ปีที่แล้ว +229

    Old school 3 person cockpit in Russia.... Captain, First Officer, Political Officer. 😅

  • @tsuchan
    @tsuchan ปีที่แล้ว +60

    So this aircraft is not stymied by sanctioned parts from abroad in its supply chain? I was surprised that this question isn't even discussed in the video.

    • @coyotelong4349
      @coyotelong4349 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Of course it is

    • @Hans-gb4mv
      @Hans-gb4mv ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why do you think it is still a 3 crew design?

    • @OtherNick
      @OtherNick ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He talks about it 50 seconds in lol

    • @laohu5511
      @laohu5511 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's is exactly the reason they are ramping up production of the aircraft .

  • @mavrick351
    @mavrick351 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    They did have a 2 pilot cockpit...TU204 SM/CM

    • @threestrikes971
      @threestrikes971 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      with western equipment bruh

    • @chakraborty1989
      @chakraborty1989 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@threestrikes971they will replace it

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@chakraborty1989 They can't replaced it. They don't have the technology to do so. If they did, it would already be fitted into the current design.

    • @lukfi89
      @lukfi89 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@nntflow7058 I doubt the issue is technology. Airliners with 2-person cockpits have been made since the 1960s.

    • @kingsharkoon
      @kingsharkoon ปีที่แล้ว

      but not in Russia with Russian suppliers... ​@@lukfi89

  • @Papershields001
    @Papershields001 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    2 Pilots 1 DJ

  • @azmalkhan01
    @azmalkhan01 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Three pilot aircraft is not economically good and old thinking
    It should be two pilots

  • @elfulano5884
    @elfulano5884 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Here comes the flying Lada!

    • @darkokoporcic7146
      @darkokoporcic7146 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      LOL!!!! The best comment ever!

    • @brittsaunders4621
      @brittsaunders4621 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ironically, it's been reported that Putin plans to open up the old Soviet Moskvich automobile factory...🤣🤣🤣

  • @tobiwan001
    @tobiwan001 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    It’s from the 1980s. It’s outdated and inefficient. But Russia likely has no other options.

    • @dquzmanovic
      @dquzmanovic ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And 737 is from when?

    • @hans8372
      @hans8372 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      The basic design of the 737 is from the 1960. It's still being built. The A320 is also older. It's relatively common in the airline industry to evolve older designs and make them more efficient.
      Russia also developed two newer aircrafts in recent time. The Sukhoi Superjet and Irkut MC21

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No proof for this claim obviously?

    • @tobiwan001
      @tobiwan001 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@bobsemple9341 it has inefficient engines and you need 3 persons in the cockpit. So what else do you need?

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@tobiwan001 no proof obviously? Like literally nothing to ur claim about the engines?
      Why do u people speak so much while knowing so little?

  • @pesawatindonesia
    @pesawatindonesia ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Happy New Year 2024

    • @MikeOxlong-
      @MikeOxlong- 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You mean happy new year 1990 (when this death trap actually started being built)…

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MikeOxlong- sources?

  • @Dan.d649
    @Dan.d649 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    IMOP, there's only one 757 and nothing else compares to it, not even the A321. Boeing 757 forever!!

    • @chakraborty1989
      @chakraborty1989 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      A321s engine isn't powerful like 757 one but Tu204s engine produce similar thrust like of 757 engines, that's why it beleive that unlike A321, Tu 204 could produce similar performance (exp like high performance in higher altitude airfield) like of 757

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@chakraborty1989 I wonder what the burn rate is though, fuel wise...the word 'Horrific' springs to mind....

    • @Dexter037S4
      @Dexter037S4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@swanvictor887 Well and they'll literally burn up in flight.

    • @deannelson9565
      @deannelson9565 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      757 forever what the hell are you talking about the 757 has been out of production for two decades

    • @thies7831
      @thies7831 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, Mr. Trump ...

  • @envitech02
    @envitech02 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I think 3 person cockpit already obsolete since the 90s??

  • @airfiero4772
    @airfiero4772 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    20 deliveries per year and a 3 person flight crew? It won't sell outside of Russia.

    • @AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc
      @AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Not meant to. Russia only.

    • @fixthetempo7276
      @fixthetempo7276 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the main idea to use it inside russia . Because of the sanctions. No idea initially to sell it. Even no idea to sell new MC-21 , because it will be to expensive.

    • @ELcinegatto87
      @ELcinegatto87 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's not for export...

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k ปีที่แล้ว

      It will be gifted not sold

    • @edthebumblingfool
      @edthebumblingfool ปีที่แล้ว

      Cuba?

  • @debb.7431
    @debb.7431 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    who will certify these jets? safety, performance etc

    • @dquzmanovic
      @dquzmanovic ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They are already certified.

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ESA did

    • @bradleyfried
      @bradleyfried ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Pyongyang and Havana. Yay.

    • @stabilo3170
      @stabilo3170 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lucasworktv Not for this "new" version.

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stabilo3170 for all

  • @davidreynolds3082
    @davidreynolds3082 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who in their right mind would want to travel on or in ANYTHING built by Russia????

    • @brittsaunders4621
      @brittsaunders4621 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I flew aboard Soviet-era jetliners (TU-134, TU-154B/M, IL-62M and IL-86) and lived to tell...

    • @ItsTristan1st
      @ItsTristan1st หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you would rather fly a Boing?????
      Good luck with that 🤣

  • @chrissimmonds3734
    @chrissimmonds3734 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    One step up from the Wright Flyer

  • @mikeplummer26
    @mikeplummer26 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I’m sure Emirates and Qatar are holding their breath for this 😂 Perhaps it’s meant for the North Korean market? They couldn’t give these away if they ever even manage to build them.

    • @АндроидКиткат
      @АндроидКиткат ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Russia tries to solve its inner transport problems. There were no conversations about export of new aircrafts somewhere.

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@АндроидКиткат Or they could just stop the invasion.
      It would be faster & cheaper.
      All they need to do is to stop and do nothing.

    • @LloydTaray-bt7ho
      @LloydTaray-bt7ho ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@nntflow7058 hahah they can't stop Russian next Alaskan they know that the US is weak now😂

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LloydTaray-bt7ho Your grammar is horrible. Please fix it because nobody understand your comment.

    • @darkokoporcic7146
      @darkokoporcic7146 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nntflow7058 They are using russian machine translation, lol.

  • @tunkunrunk
    @tunkunrunk ปีที่แล้ว

    they'll never change their ever-last green flight desk

  • @goodiezgrigis
    @goodiezgrigis ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is just what is available right now by their domestic production. Kind of temporary solution before MS series comes to market.

    • @carlosgamarrath244
      @carlosgamarrath244 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You mean AUC = MC-21- 300 and MC1-200.......????

  • @josephdurso5894
    @josephdurso5894 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The first fully Russian airliner, which uses no imported parts.

  • @josephpadula2283
    @josephpadula2283 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Better to rule in hell than serve in heaven ?

  • @neilkurzman4907
    @neilkurzman4907 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So this new aircraft was designed and built with absolutely no western components.
    Unlikely.

    • @jimmyj1969
      @jimmyj1969 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not unlikely at all. Russian aerospace industry have such capabilities - it's the volume of mass production that is rather limited, though.

    • @Jin88866
      @Jin88866 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's not new, it's from the 80s

    • @ibrahimtouman2279
      @ibrahimtouman2279 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Jin88866 saying that is like saying B-737 is from the 60s

  • @stephenjacobs5640
    @stephenjacobs5640 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    why does every russian airplane always have some random deal breaker quirk💀

  • @olumideiluyomade7613
    @olumideiluyomade7613 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tu-204sm is already improved and designed for 2 man crew operation. Simple Flying, ....you guys need to update your information.

  • @alexandervt641
    @alexandervt641 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Production of the 757 endet 20 years ago.

    • @68404
      @68404 ปีที่แล้ว

      And the F-16 came out in 1974 and is stil being manufactured..

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@68404…because it is still competitive. In contrast to Boeings 757, let alone the Tu-214.

    • @thies7831
      @thies7831 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is THE bonus of the 214. Every aircraft built will be "ONE MORE AND AHEAD of the 757" ... Not in aviation history, just for the current records.

    • @thatnorwegianguy1986
      @thatnorwegianguy1986 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@68404 Not the original F-16's the new block version is manufactured yes in small numbers for certain countries but that is a different beast than the original F-16 with massive changes.
      But overall the F-16 is being replaced all over the world by most countries as well.

  • @thatnorwegianguy1986
    @thatnorwegianguy1986 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I didnt realize Russia had a lot of 757 operators if they don't then competing with an aircraft that is no longer in production and is being replaced all over the world is a little strange.

  • @demiller74
    @demiller74 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    757 rival… wait, Boeing stopped building it when?

    • @deannelson9565
      @deannelson9565 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      2004

    • @demiller74
      @demiller74 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@deannelson9565 yeah, that’s what I thought

    • @lastmanstanding9389
      @lastmanstanding9389 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@demiller74 so why are they thinking of bringing it back?

    • @demiller74
      @demiller74 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lastmanstanding9389 Duh it's a good plane

    • @langlaisjean-claude9418
      @langlaisjean-claude9418 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      depuis que les portes disparaissent en vol

  • @armandstreilihs3489
    @armandstreilihs3489 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    3 person cockpit?! In 2024? Really? 🤡

    • @АндроидКиткат
      @АндроидКиткат ปีที่แล้ว +12

      It's better than nothing, isn't it?

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@АндроидКиткат It's not better than stopping the invasion and stop burning billions of dollars every year for nothing.

    • @benj.kerman609
      @benj.kerman609 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shut up

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ameruca could probably do with this. Due to their flights getting so dangerous

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yep and it's OK for the short time

  • @eritreafirst
    @eritreafirst 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think this plane in its current format could be used as transition. But later it should be upgrade if it is to be economical

  • @1ReasonableGuy
    @1ReasonableGuy ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Needing 3 persons to fly that plane helps bring down unemployment…

    • @Canleaf08
      @Canleaf08 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      how?

    • @FelipeCH-fn7sc
      @FelipeCH-fn7sc ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And it shows the Russians not trusting their 2 crew layout...which has been industry standard since the early 80s worldwide

    • @dquzmanovic
      @dquzmanovic ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no unemployment in Russia.

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unemployment is extremely low in Russia

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FelipeCH-fn7sc I never responded to you. Why waste my time speaking? Read the original comment.

  • @Gari-k8k
    @Gari-k8k ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Зачем выдумывать велосипед, есть же МС-21, тратить ресурсы на эти ТУ,-204,Ту- 214 - глупо. МС-21 вполне конкурентный самолёт.

  • @augustgnarly
    @augustgnarly ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In other news, I’m going to start building 30 Ferraris per year in my garage from scratch.

    • @ELcinegatto87
      @ELcinegatto87 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They've been building airliners for 80 years.

    • @edthebumblingfool
      @edthebumblingfool ปีที่แล้ว

      how good were they?@@ELcinegatto87

    • @ibrahimtouman2279
      @ibrahimtouman2279 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@edthebumblingfool good enough to carry millions of people to their destinations throughout the years

  • @Glideslopes
    @Glideslopes ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1,000 frames by the end of the decade???? ROFLMAO.

    • @ELcinegatto87
      @ELcinegatto87 ปีที่แล้ว

      I heard 300 and change, where he pulled that 1000 number from I have no idea.

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ELcinegatto87it's so simple just put random numbers. Nobody cares.

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Flight Engineers are good to reduce workload, so pilots can do flying.

  • @forbeginnersandbeyond6089
    @forbeginnersandbeyond6089 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Cockpit operations system: Windows 95. Don't worry. When it crashes, just CTRL-ALT-DEL to reboot.

  • @yapiciyapici5874
    @yapiciyapici5874 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sleek aircraft..

  • @MrDon0245
    @MrDon0245 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good luck with this lemon!

  • @zac7695
    @zac7695 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I would never fly on any Russian plane.

    • @totalrecone
      @totalrecone ปีที่แล้ว +9

      And I'm quite sure this alone will shut down Russian aircraft manufacture almost immediately.

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@totalrecone Well no, their own corruption would probably be the case.

    • @jlmarc01
      @jlmarc01 ปีที่แล้ว

      RIP

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Experts in da house 😂

  • @AO-ow6tt
    @AO-ow6tt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Better flying late than never flying.

  • @nicolashommerin7729
    @nicolashommerin7729 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What are the engines? It’s a critical problem.

  • @AUmarcus
    @AUmarcus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wont be long before one goes down.

    • @MrNeversweat
      @MrNeversweat ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you going to be onboard Mr jealous?

  • @ksfAandkhiproductions151
    @ksfAandkhiproductions151 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Air koryo needs some of em

  • @GaryKennedy-g7p
    @GaryKennedy-g7p 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what is truly weird in all this .... the new Airbus A321XLRs with their stretched fuselages .... are now much the same as a 757 or Tu-214 .... we seem to have come full circle ....

  • @MDSR17455
    @MDSR17455 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The question is that why is that plane still not using the pd 14 engines

    • @thies7831
      @thies7831 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Easy ... FIRST, let's build the 1000 airframes, THEN find the material for the 2000+ engines ...

  • @1InHouston
    @1InHouston ปีที่แล้ว

    With the shortage of pilots all over the world, who will buy 3 pilots aircraft?

  • @noway5590
    @noway5590 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Interjet in mexico had suhhoi aircraft, no spare parts avalability mean scavenging some aircraft to keep them flying,

    • @68404
      @68404 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      True.
      And it was the hot portion of the jet engines that grounded them. The French were responsible for that engineering, not the Russians.

    • @chiefdenis
      @chiefdenis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      French engineering at it again😂

  • @Hanginthere4100
    @Hanginthere4100 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    3 Person cockpit :
    - Pilot
    - Co-pilot
    - Priest

    • @guillermojimenezcastelblan8456
      @guillermojimenezcastelblan8456 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The priest is an option to consider by opting for the latest B 737 family airplanes, based on their reckless assembly and delivering policies.

    • @chiefdenis
      @chiefdenis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now I know why 737s have been dropping from the sky, No three person cockpit😂

  • @gsprasanna6382
    @gsprasanna6382 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What other choise do the Russians have?

    • @classicjetsims
      @classicjetsims ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe they can stop being genocidal pricks and try and get along with their neighbours for once.

    • @thechlebek901
      @thechlebek901 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@classicjetsimsthat's historically known to be impossible

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stopping the invasion. Sounds cheaper.

    • @some-rando
      @some-rando ปีที่แล้ว +12

      To leave the country they're occupying?

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Chinese options. But China isn't very good at building planes

  • @drvarinadrvarina6763
    @drvarinadrvarina6763 ปีที่แล้ว

    super...👍👏👏👏

  • @rodneilson5831
    @rodneilson5831 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Bring back the Tu 154 my favourite aircraft

    • @timonsolus
      @timonsolus ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nah - bring back the iconic Lisunov Li-2P (license-built Soviet-version of the Douglas DC-3).

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only if you're paying for jet fuel

  • @CaliforniaMISC
    @CaliforniaMISC ปีที่แล้ว +51

    I would rather walk than fly on Russian made planes.

    • @CongressSux1776
      @CongressSux1776 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Why? They are easily top five nation in terms of aviation history.
      You think wholly-Russian built planes are any less safe than these multi-national built ones out out by airbus and Boeing?

    • @Weeb404
      @Weeb404 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@CongressSux1776 yes

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CongressSux1776yes

    • @osasunaitor
      @osasunaitor ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@CongressSux1776absolutely, yes.

    • @theyjustwantyourmoney4539
      @theyjustwantyourmoney4539 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There's a beginning for everything, Boeing once had it's own beginning

  • @khapho
    @khapho ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They for sure took their time😑, thought those russian made plane was send to graveyard after western made plane took over🙄

  • @zloinaopako
    @zloinaopako ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Resurrection of old soviet technological achievements will not be sustainable in the log run. At some point, the RND will have to kick in, but that will be costly and is doubtful whether RF economy can finance current and future Russian wars and high technology RND concurrently.

    • @theshadowman1398
      @theshadowman1398 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Keep telling yourself that.

    • @michaeldunham3385
      @michaeldunham3385 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      ​@@theshadowman1398they will because it's true

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@theshadowman1398 The proof is the fact that this plane still required to be operated by 3 pilots.

    • @lolcatjunior
      @lolcatjunior ปีที่แล้ว +3

      China says that they will be continuing building the CR-929(Chinese Russian boeing 787 competitor) and India announced to continue military cooperation.

    • @HATCH5T
      @HATCH5T ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Mc 21? Pd 14

  • @jarkiiaviation4643
    @jarkiiaviation4643 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happened to the MC-21? Too much western parts?

    • @RustedCroaker
      @RustedCroaker 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes. It was a big mistake to select such unreliable suppliers in the first place.
      Hope they wouldn't made such an error in the future ever.

    • @ItsTristan1st
      @ItsTristan1st หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is has recently started serial production after a round of substitution.

  • @chrisbremner8992
    @chrisbremner8992 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Should be producing 200 per year .

  • @littleowlbooks8514
    @littleowlbooks8514 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats not going to happen, is it?

  • @damowilliams204
    @damowilliams204 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Never underestimate Russian aviation...

    • @paulv22
      @paulv22 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Can I underestimate Russian maritime?

    • @jeanpierrelaolou5490
      @jeanpierrelaolou5490 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Neither the army, tank turrets fly higher in Russia

    • @ibrahimtouman2279
      @ibrahimtouman2279 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@jeanpierrelaolou5490 bro, Leopard and Bradley performed awfully during the Ukrainian summer counteroffensive

    • @cyber_engine
      @cyber_engine ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jeanpierrelaolou5490 another copium boy.

  • @guillermojimenezcastelblan8456
    @guillermojimenezcastelblan8456 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let`s see the Russian Federation physical map: The country is HUGE, more than 135 million people needing for a flights schedule daily. The TU 204 has its own international Certificate Airworthiness, due TNT Cargo international airline was operating the type inside Europe and Northamerican air spaces as well, back in the early 21th Century years. The TU 214 needs that certificate, some hard to get because geopolitical stuff, the only aircraft`s enemy. Inside Russian territory, the next door friendly countries, among them North Korea, and Caribbean Cubana de Aviaciòn air carrier, they`re already their natural and potential operating costumers.

  • @Sanyu-Tumusiime
    @Sanyu-Tumusiime ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Good for them! Build it!

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      well, it keeps them off the front line, bless. So funny...

  • @supergeek0177
    @supergeek0177 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Surprising they haven't done any joint ventures with the Chinese

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was attempted. But it puts the Chinese part of the project at risk being associated with Russia right now. Also do keep in mind China can't contribute much. They're behind Russia in terms of plane building

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It calls diversification

    • @ItsTristan1st
      @ItsTristan1st หลายเดือนก่อน

      They likely share components.
      The Chinese definitely buy engines from Russia and are signed on the buy the PD-14 among others.

    • @Rehunauris
      @Rehunauris 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​​@@ItsTristan1stChinese are developing their own CJ-1000 turbofan engines. PD-14 is already years late and on paper CJ-1000A is better choice for C919.

  • @randomplanenoob
    @randomplanenoob ปีที่แล้ว +9

    haters be hating

    • @filledwithvariousknowledge2747
      @filledwithvariousknowledge2747 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You clearly can’t grasp reality

    • @Rasscasse
      @Rasscasse ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Invaders be invading

    • @dquzmanovic
      @dquzmanovic ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, Vietnam, Grenada, Cuba, Korea, Iraq, Syria, Lybia, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan....

  • @GeoStreber
    @GeoStreber ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Yeah, good luck running that thing without western parts.

    • @CheapBastard1988
      @CheapBastard1988 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      It's a Soviet era aircraft, so probably possible.

    • @Sanyu-Tumusiime
      @Sanyu-Tumusiime ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You don’t need western parts for Soviet era aircraft.

    • @tsuchan
      @tsuchan ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Sanyu-Tumusiime Even then, I still don't get it. If it's a Soviet era plane, how is Aeroflot's biggest problem that it needs 3 pilots?

  • @TDCflyer
    @TDCflyer ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I'm pretty sure UAC has no way to acquire proper modern avionics or even engines. If anything they'll be using what they had sitting in storage before the start of their Ukraine invasion, other than that it'll mean return to 1960's tech. Which explains the 3 person cockpit.

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      No sources obviously? U don't believe in those?

    • @haven216
      @haven216 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      The MC-21 exists.

    • @12pentaborane
      @12pentaborane ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@bobsemple9341 It says 3 crew in the video.

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@12pentaborane that's not what was asked. Don't waste my time

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k ปีที่แล้ว +2

      where have you seen modern avionics?

  • @MrNeversweat
    @MrNeversweat ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Well-done Russia, heading towards real and 100% self sufficiency

  • @tammyho6698
    @tammyho6698 ปีที่แล้ว

    No passenger will buy tickets to fly on one

  • @NARAINDOPRIMETIV
    @NARAINDOPRIMETIV หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think The TU-204 IS More sucssesful than the Tu-214 i mean the both aircrafts are the same

  • @adolfocornavaca2544
    @adolfocornavaca2544 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone Max9?

  • @nobody2132
    @nobody2132 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    bro not the russian 757 ripoff

  • @sjaguartype
    @sjaguartype ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Can’t wait said nobody who like living

  • @PeterMuskrat6968
    @PeterMuskrat6968 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    lol gonna start having the ol USSR reputation for commercial aircraft.
    500% more crashes than the next Country on the list.

  • @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus
    @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No doubt some Ivan will be smoking near something explosive at the factory.

    • @romanm301
      @romanm301 ปีที่แล้ว

      Идиот.

  • @MikeOxlong-
    @MikeOxlong- 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Deliver next year?? What?!? They’ve been making this pathetic machine for over 3 decades now… 🤦‍♂️ Actually, 35 years to be exact! 😂😂😂

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imagine, their doors don’t fly out like on 1960s 737 🤣

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lucasworktvBecause it doesn‘t fly at all.

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alexandervt641 who?

  • @evolancer211
    @evolancer211 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Those engines look kinda ugly

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah. Because everyone love engines for their beauty

    • @thies7831
      @thies7831 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why ? They are STREAMLINED, not like those large udders on Western jets.

  • @stuffifollow
    @stuffifollow ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh, for god sake...

  • @michaelvanallen6400
    @michaelvanallen6400 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The reality: All Russian civil aircraft (e.g. SJ 100, MC 21, TU-204 etc) have so far had significantly higher maintenance costs & downtimes than promised & than competitor aircraft. Therefore since 2000 their world market share (outside Russia/Belarus/Cuba) is less than 0.1%! It became known that MC 21 and Superjet SJ100 without foreign key components would have significantly poorer performance values (range, altitude, acceleration, speed).

  • @jlmarc01
    @jlmarc01 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    It probably won’t start when u need to fly

    • @implodingbaby
      @implodingbaby ปีที่แล้ว +24

      At least that will make it safe

    • @EJayMD-11
      @EJayMD-11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@implodingbaby😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @LeslieChen83
      @LeslieChen83 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Better wont start than starting then crashing... Twice.

    • @chriscalderin6677
      @chriscalderin6677 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why do people bash Russia ?

    • @LeslieChen83
      @LeslieChen83 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@chriscalderin6677 i think they're jealous. Russia seemed to be self sustaining...

  • @glennlittle1580
    @glennlittle1580 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wouldn't fly on anything Russian that starts with TU

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why? American flying is getting very dangerous

  • @PAN-km5qk
    @PAN-km5qk ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1000 Russian jetliners by 2030 😂😂😂😂😂
    That is pathetic! 😢😂

    • @Vadim-gi4sg
      @Vadim-gi4sg ปีที่แล้ว

      Это не реально😮

  • @drpankajkumar9432
    @drpankajkumar9432 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The challenge is from the biased western world particularly the Air Bus, Boing, GE, RR and Safron engines who will certainly create problems in Russian aircraft certification.

  • @outermarker5801
    @outermarker5801 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tu political, tu little, tu late. And with a 3 person crew, tu old

  • @Marklin15
    @Marklin15 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    What about TU-154M? 3 engines > 2 engines

    • @aydoyt
      @aydoyt ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The Tu-154 was discontinued in 2013

    • @vladimirassalukas6726
      @vladimirassalukas6726 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those were with booster controls, this if i not mistake is fly by wire. IL96 is flybywire though

    • @henson2k
      @henson2k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      154M is 50% more fuel hungry than Airbus 32x

    • @kathibaba7665
      @kathibaba7665 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why not fix PD-14 engines

    • @player1GR
      @player1GR ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kathibaba7665 204 214 is better

  • @chakraborty1989
    @chakraborty1989 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Russia could make 2 pilot cockpit but right now they are probably want to rampup the production so they are producing those jets like already designed one, with 3 pilot.
    Maybe in next 2/3 years they would start producing 2 pilot Version of it.

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว

      They can't, all the materials and technology for it are from the west.

    • @xpetrov3157
      @xpetrov3157 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes. you are right. By the way - in 2010 was produced and tested modification of TU-204/214 -TU-204SM ( two planes) with 2 pilots cockpit and other improvements .But due to lobbying and corruption in the government it was decided not to produce in favor of western Airbus and Boeing .Also the Russian regional jet aircraft SSJ-100 has 2 pilots . Currently more than 160 aircraft of this type are operated in Russia

  • @hflomoe1998
    @hflomoe1998 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love is pray it sell well

  • @celebrityrog
    @celebrityrog ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Welcome to the 1970s Russia. 3 Crew Cockpit? REALLY? Boeing 757 is old and not even being manufactured anymore. Seriously, most airlines are moving to 767/777/787 and Airbus A350.

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว

      Flying in America is so much safer eh?

    • @van0tot100
      @van0tot100 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes

    • @deannelson9565
      @deannelson9565 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bobsemple9341 absolutely. One fatality in the past 10 years.

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@deannelson9565 no sources obviously?

    • @thebelltower8040
      @thebelltower8040 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@deannelson9565 Rly ahahah? Check wiki at least, bruh

  • @jamesyates8942
    @jamesyates8942 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Get rid of that awful musiç iñ the baçkgroungq itts sooooooooannoying 4:08 4:08 4:08 4:08 4:08 4:08

  • @Danfrodo1
    @Danfrodo1 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’d rather walk.

  • @kimsmoke17
    @kimsmoke17 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Probably 90% higher specific fuel consumption compared to Airbus equivalent, and probably 3x -4x poorer safety record.

    • @B52Stratofortress1
      @B52Stratofortress1 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      The safety record of this type is actually good. It's commercial efficiency, not so much and is outdated.

    • @SpidaMez
      @SpidaMez ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the only crash didn't kill that many people actually

    • @bobsemple9341
      @bobsemple9341 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No source for this of course?

    • @lucasworktv
      @lucasworktv ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sources?

    • @ibrahimtouman2279
      @ibrahimtouman2279 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      please don't invent numbers from your imagination, it is disgusting..

  • @michellearrington4846
    @michellearrington4846 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I boycott russia so I will never fly on any of these.

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      This plane won't be certified on international level.

    • @АндроидКиткат
      @АндроидКиткат ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I think they'll withstand it

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@АндроидКиткат I don't even think Russian stand themself to be fair.

    • @chakraborty1989
      @chakraborty1989 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ​@@nntflow7058only EU nd USA.
      I don't think FAA can bully China or others in Asia anymore.

    • @smcdonald9991
      @smcdonald9991 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@chakraborty1989 You're right but they don't have to. Lesssons learned from IL-96 and SU-100 sales to foreign operators: no spare parts, no trained mechanics, no flight simulator, no training.

  • @markwils5042
    @markwils5042 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good luck, not for me.

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks God, not for you

  • @strangevideos3048
    @strangevideos3048 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Vladimir Pyutin".😅

  • @hikarikaguraenjoyer9918
    @hikarikaguraenjoyer9918 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “Competitor”

  • @landscapevision6553
    @landscapevision6553 ปีที่แล้ว

    What westerners would dare fly on it….?

    • @maxkozlov9456
      @maxkozlov9456 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope no one. Because this plane needs in Russia right now.

  • @evgeniyglebov
    @evgeniyglebov ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very good👍 🇷🇺

  • @hj8272
    @hj8272 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How many of those wheelbarrows were ordered by other than russian airlines? And I'm talking about civilized world, not third world.

  • @muhammaddahlan830
    @muhammaddahlan830 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rusia !!!!!!
    1. Sama tuntaskan ridak ada bedanya, 01 januari 2024🕋🏟️🔔🔔🔔📯📯📯📯📯📯🕋🏟️🚄🚄🕋🏟️🚅🚅🕋🏟️⛵⛵⛵⛵🕋🏟️🏰🏰🏰🕋🏟️🕌🕌🕌🕋🏟️🕍🕍🕍🕍🕋🏟️🏥🏥🏥🏣🕋🏟️🔔📯📯

  • @MBNeal
    @MBNeal ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I'm American. I would love to fly on Russian built aircraft. I hope the world can get along soon so that I might have the chance.

    • @paulj2948
      @paulj2948 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean you hope Russia stops invading and killing its neighbor??

    • @BreckThePanther
      @BreckThePanther ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Yeah, sure you are.

    • @johnc2438
      @johnc2438 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I'm A Martian. I would love to fly on Earthling built spaceship. I hope the solar system can get along soon so that I might have the chance.

    • @iancarisi8342
      @iancarisi8342 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I too am American, Greetings from Texas, If you want to go there, then do it. I myself have been to Russia four times this year, no problem.

  • @MlLKMAN
    @MlLKMAN ปีที่แล้ว

    Good enough for the third world

    • @thies7831
      @thies7831 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For parking them at their airports ... ? Although, who is giving them the money for fuel to operate them ?