Top 5: The World's Largest Jet Engine Manufacturers

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 116

  • @Marc-ww7cc
    @Marc-ww7cc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    Thanks for the video. A bit of feedback: the music is way too loud in this video in comparison to the narrator's vocals volume.

    • @michaelcyanbirdcool
      @michaelcyanbirdcool 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed.

    • @Harnam99
      @Harnam99 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yes, it’s irritating

    • @sunset3052
      @sunset3052 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good point

  • @Logan11thMEU
    @Logan11thMEU 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    First time Ive seen the GE90s I could not believe how huge they are. I could literally drive my car inside it

    • @johniii8147
      @johniii8147 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I wouldn’t advise that

    • @GarrettWorcester
      @GarrettWorcester 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@johniii8147 - Sounds like fun to me! What could possibly go wrong?🤣🤣🤣🤣😟😲 ☠

    • @johniii8147
      @johniii8147 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GarrettWorcester It was a funny comment, I will give him that.

  • @composimple364
    @composimple364 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    3:13 there is no Trent 600. Trent 800 Is the one for Boeing 777

  • @stevenholt1867
    @stevenholt1867 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    My favourite has to be the Rolls Royce RB211.

    • @tomking1890
      @tomking1890 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Slow to spool up, as it is a triple spool engine.

    • @trevorhart545
      @trevorhart545 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was nearly a disaster and led to the separation of the Car and Aero Engines parts of the Company with RR Cars going to BMW and Bentley going to VW. RR are also Nuclear Reactor Manufacturers for UK Submarines and have a significant presence in Marine Propulsion.
      Nice to review their military jet engines where P&W and GE Dominate through the massive scale of US Military Aircraft. The USMC is as big as many European Armies and has a significant airforce.

  • @amuyrizz
    @amuyrizz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    As Engine Mechanic, happy to watch this video

  • @rollingreene1220
    @rollingreene1220 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Super focused video - I'm a jet mechanic from way back and really enjoyed the overview of the major turbofan manufacturers - I'm familiar with PW so they are definitely my favorite

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I worked on the assembly floor 1 1/2 years building JT8s and JT-9s in the late 70s. The Dads and oldest brothers of both my wife and I retired from there. I quit and moved to Alaska to work in electronics and communications which worked out quite well. I was an avionics technician on P-3s 50 years ago.

    • @johniii8147
      @johniii8147 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      PW is trash these days.

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johniii8147 They outsourced vital engine components that were made in-house years ago. My oldest brother retired from there over 20 years ago and told me about some of the crap the got from foreign countries. My best friend growing up was an engineering department head and he never seemed happy when ever we talked over the years I think the stress killed him as he retired in his late 50s and died 4 years later.

    • @bartholomewshirima7060
      @bartholomewshirima7060 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What about Russian and Chinese engines?!...stop biase

    • @rollingreene1220
      @rollingreene1220 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bartholomewshirima7060 It's not bias if I've actually worked with the products - Let me know your direct experience as a Jet Mechanic on a Chinese or Russian Powerplant

  • @salehwahib3749
    @salehwahib3749 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There is also MTU Aero Engines AG.

  • @Chris_at_Home
    @Chris_at_Home 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I worked on the assembly floor at P&WA for 1 1/2 years in the late 1970s. It was a good job but not for me. I was an avionics technician in the military and went to work in electronics and communications and probably flew on jets that had engines I helped assemble. I worked mainly assembling JT-8s, but did some work on the JT-9 including a tear down after test. I moved to Alaska after I left there and I remember many of the engines went to airlines there as this was in the build paper work. Different airlines put different accessories on the engine.

  • @billotto602
    @billotto602 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In my first interview for a job with a commercial airline, I was told "if we want a light bulb, we'll call GE, if we want a luxury car we'll call Rolls-Royce, but if we want a jet engine we call Pratt & Whitney". LOL. I've been partial to them because the planes I worked on in the Navy had P&W engines.

  • @MrPoornakumar
    @MrPoornakumar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    What is listed here is the set of Engine designers, who do manufacturing too. Many more manufacturers are there around the world, who do their job after receiving design drawings - so as to make them under license.
    A significant omission here, is the information on Russian Engine designers & manufacturers.

    • @arman3291
      @arman3291 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russian aerospace technology is dying slowly, so better not mention it.

    • @MrPoornakumar
      @MrPoornakumar หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@arman3291
      Is it?
      They are still designing & building aircraft & engine sets. They are i use.
      Their design approach to "reliability" is different. They make robust things (aircraft or engine) with less number of links - to fail. In the West they add too many things to monitor performance, auto-correct, "fail-safe" etc., thus each component in the chain shares the reliability (less failure tolerant) & enhancing "over all" reliability. In India, we inherited the Western approach.

    • @arman3291
      @arman3291 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrPoornakumar India is very poor, but has a better future than Russia. Russia is successfuly overtaken by Japan, China and potentially Brazil & India.

  • @4vndd
    @4vndd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very well researched and presented.... thanks for sharing...!!

  • @obelic71
    @obelic71 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fun fact Rolls Royce does not only build jet/turbine engines.
    It also owns now the worldfamous and historic Maybach engine Plant in Germany.
    Maybach was one of the 3 ICE pioneer engineers (Daimler / Otto / Maybach) who developed and lay the ground work for ALL manufacturers who build ICE engines today.
    MTU Builds marine, military and commercial Piston engines.
    Rolls Royce engines power all forms of transport form Submarines till Aircraft.

  • @andrewdoubtfire4700
    @andrewdoubtfire4700 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Was RR’s engine mentioned that will now power the B52?

    • @BerlinAerial
      @BerlinAerial 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, but this one called F130, a former civil engine called BR725 (developed in Germany) as military version.

  • @ianmaritim3876
    @ianmaritim3876 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    There is a mistake
    The Trent 600- was to power future B747-400X
    The Trent 800- B777-200

    • @composimple364
      @composimple364 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And 777-300 too.

  • @Olifantenstaart
    @Olifantenstaart 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Good to know is that the Rolls Royce jet engine and luxury car companies are no longer affiliated.

  • @REL1508
    @REL1508 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    GE also making engines for military use, as well P&W , RR used to but nowadays i think no more. For more power- thrust P&W , GE excel in helicopter - where torque is needed. That's my opinion

  • @pesawatindonesia
    @pesawatindonesia 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Happy New Year 2024

  • @Capt.OggyPeabodyOfficial
    @Capt.OggyPeabodyOfficial 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My favorites were all of them
    GE Aerospace (CF6, GE90, GENx,GE9X, GP7000 and LEAP)
    Pratt and Whitney (JT8D, PW1000G, PW2000, PW4000, V2500 and GP7000)
    Rolls-Royce (any members of the Trent Family)

  • @grantnaval4519
    @grantnaval4519 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They're all great in their own share and expertise!
    Luckily enough to handle their products that are installed in the aircraft commercial world!
    From engine servicing to engine change. Amazing works of art that makes efficiency in air travel. Possible!
    #GE90_115B
    #RR_Trent_700
    #RR_TRENT_XWB
    #RR_TRENT_7000
    #CFM56_5B
    #IAEV2500
    #PW1100G

  • @dodoubleg2356
    @dodoubleg2356 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Anyone else heard the rumor that (per sources) the GE-90 actually produced nearly 130k-lbf on a few occasions during testing & inspections?? Just curious. ✈️ 😉✌️

  • @Bossmanntg
    @Bossmanntg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wait Sukhoi doesn't manufacture commercial jet engines?

  • @Gelaviation
    @Gelaviation 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi! I like your videos!

    • @davidmontville4885
      @davidmontville4885 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Background 'music' annoying, thankfully it's a short one

    • @Gelaviation
      @Gelaviation 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidmontville4885 well I like that one video of him for PAL, the music on the A350 part is SO GOOD!

  • @m.ostrowski2244
    @m.ostrowski2244 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So Well Done !!! Is there a similar video for the Defense market worldwide ? Thank You

  • @sillycatgirlnya
    @sillycatgirlnya 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ok but what is that music lmao

  • @nurrizadjatmiko21
    @nurrizadjatmiko21 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome👍

  • @XX-zq4hv
    @XX-zq4hv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Actually IAE is the owner of the PW1100-Program of the A320neo. Even if it has the Name „PW“, it has the same IAE Parners and in all official documents IAE is named as the OEM!

  • @frederickshayo2566
    @frederickshayo2566 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    No Russian engines in the list....interesting

    • @tayikolla6205
      @tayikolla6205 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I guess it's because it only lists manufacturers for civilian planes and a Russian doesn't have yet any civilian plane powered by a Russian engine

    • @eraserstp
      @eraserstp 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tayikolla6205 Tu-204\214 and Il-96 powered by PS-90 engines, MS-21 by PD-14 engines, SSJ-100 by Russian-French SaM-146 engines, and are currently being transferred to purely Russian PD-8. But I agree that it is too early to call UEC one of the world's largest manufacturers of engines for civilian aircraft.

    • @katimboallan4605
      @katimboallan4605 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is the IL-96 used by cubana Airline, the plane is powered by PS-90 jet engine built by Aviadvigatel

    • @EuropeanRailfanAlt
      @EuropeanRailfanAlt 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't think Aviadvigatel (one of the top engine producers in Russia) is in the Top 5 for Largest Jet Engine manufacturers

  • @jasminejohnston6393
    @jasminejohnston6393 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here’s a fact: Rolls-Royce cars are actually made by BMW; Rolls-Royce only makes aircraft engines nowadays

    • @mariododik9944
      @mariododik9944 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Rolls Royce is just a name. Mitsubishi, Kawasaki, Sumitomo, Volvo Aero are more responsible for this success. Rolls Royce almost no longer produces a single part for it, as well as for GE, it is done by other companies that supply them with ready-made turbines and compressors, for example. And they just put it all together.

  • @KevinDondrea
    @KevinDondrea 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I could name 4. I worked for one division but not the actual company. I worked for GE Lighting.

  • @muraleedharanp.v6767
    @muraleedharanp.v6767 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about klimov engines?

  • @europaeuropa3673
    @europaeuropa3673 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What about Chinese jet engine manufacturers?

  • @arvidm4913
    @arvidm4913 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cfm and iae are not engine manufacturer. They dont have their own facilities and are just joint venture between the oems.

  • @fanBladeOne
    @fanBladeOne 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Allright lads. Let's place our bets :)

  • @markiangooley
    @markiangooley 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Rolls-Royce engine series: traditionally named after rivers, hence Trent. I wonder if they’ll choose a river’s name for the Ultrafan’s series.

    • @michaelrmurphy2734
      @michaelrmurphy2734 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thames or Hudson or Amazon or Nile or Mississippi...?

    • @johniii8147
      @johniii8147 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Doesn’t really matter

    • @Robert-ow2dw
      @Robert-ow2dw 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ultrafan is not ment to be an engine, at least not in it's current form. Its a technology demonstrator.

    • @Rasscasse
      @Rasscasse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting that about the rivers. What other river name have they used besides Trent?
      I do know that the river Trent flows through Derbyshire south of the city of Derby. Maybe that is why, given that Derby is the home of Rolls-Royce.
      If I was going to choose another English river as a name, I would not choose the river Thames, just because most foreigners would pronounce it wrongly. They would not realise that the ‘H’ was not pronounced and that that would be annoying.

    • @johniii8147
      @johniii8147 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Robert-ow2dw True it's just a testbed at this point. RR has been publicly clear it's not a priority for them at the moment.

  • @petertimowreef9085
    @petertimowreef9085 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Downvoted because you don't use metric units like normal people, not even as captions on screen.

  • @MrAntvern
    @MrAntvern 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ROLLS-ROYCE

  • @princediego4673
    @princediego4673 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Please turn down or remove the music. I love simple flying videos, but they are unwatchable with this music. Just go back to narrator only. The music starting and stopping is just awful.

    • @Rasscasse
      @Rasscasse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed

  • @thereal757_ap
    @thereal757_ap 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is there a video which is sort of a spotters guide to identifying which engines are being used on which aircraft? I can never get it down, and would love to see something like that. As always, amazing work. Thank you.

    • @Rasscasse
      @Rasscasse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do know what you mean, It can be complicated. I can never remember them all.
      Some new aircraft come with an engine and there is no choice, other aircraft, you have a choice of engine manufacturer.
      I just remember bits of things like the later versions of the 757 were Rolls-Royce equipped, but the earlier versions of it used something else. PW I think.
      I do know that the Boeing 747 was originally launched with the seriously flawed PW engines, but later there were other engine options.

  • @Kumar-y3l3l
    @Kumar-y3l3l 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rolls Royce ❤❤❤❤

  • @johniii8147
    @johniii8147 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I forgot about IAE. But, they are actually not currently producing engines. Just supporting existing ones. they don’t have any new generation engines to put on the current production generation of aircraft.

    • @XX-zq4hv
      @XX-zq4hv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They do have the PW1100, its a Pratt&Whitney Name but in the documentations you can See, that the company behind is IAE!

    • @johniii8147
      @johniii8147 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@XX-zq4hv That is PW's problem plagued GTF engine. No, IAE isn't behind it other than supplying some parts and getting tons of business fixing all the problems. IAE no longer really exists as an engine maker anymore.

  • @Rasscasse
    @Rasscasse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First thing ive done is pause the video after five seconds to try and think of different engine manufacturers.
    I’ve not got many.
    Pratt and Whitney
    Rolls-Royce
    General Electric
    CFM Leap
    Safrane
    Then you’ve got a Russian stuff. Do Illusysin make their own ?
    Then you have the Chinese making aeroplanes. Do they make their own engine?
    I’ll go watch the video now.

  • @johnpatricklim4509
    @johnpatricklim4509 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Honda partnered with GE to build engines for their Hondajet....

  • @aineshscreation9543
    @aineshscreation9543 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GE Aerospace

  • @bireswarhalder9765
    @bireswarhalder9765 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why no Russian engine mentioned?

    • @PaulVerhoeven2
      @PaulVerhoeven2 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Because they are not in top 5 or probably even top10.

  • @tahititoutou3802
    @tahititoutou3802 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It started very well. Then they added this boom-boom-boom-boom "music"... 😢

  • @euloge996
    @euloge996 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍

  • @alexandergrigorov2594
    @alexandergrigorov2594 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Jet Engine market count down to three big OEM as CFMI and IAE are basically alliances between them.

  • @marceloluispanis
    @marceloluispanis 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    EMBRAER

  • @amanikarume3900
    @amanikarume3900 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GE is my favourite aero engine manufacturer!

    • @mariododik9944
      @mariododik9944 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tell the people the truth who is grateful for your America the land of dreams. Japanese and French and other countries that design and manufacture 80% of parts for General Electric. GE is just a name. This is where American success is minimal. All parts are designed and manufactured outside of America. In America, they just fit into one whole.

  • @cellevangiel5973
    @cellevangiel5973 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please keep in mind that only Americans still use the Imperical units. And a lot of you viewers are not.

  • @paavangoyal
    @paavangoyal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Spinny bois

  • @tonylam9548
    @tonylam9548 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Exactly what is the difference between a turbo fan and a turbo prop??? The high by-pass turbo fan nowadays are basically a glorified turbo prop. The prop been renamed a fan and are partially hidden in a shroud to pull the wool over the ignorant public's eyes. Yes there are some gains in efficiencies, at the cost of more structural weights and complexities and contra rotating props do have a reputation of being noisy. The other thing the public do not seems to know is , we are still struggling with the "sound barrier" for that last 3/4 century. A "jet" that is a speed record holder just beat the next runner up by maybe 3 kts. The time had gone ways into fixing some handling problems at the coffin's corner and economy, but turbines are still at a disadvantage in fuel consumption , compare with pistons. For really long distances, such as crossing the Pacific, big airlines still have the edge over the smaller jets. For trips like NY to HKG or even Sydney non stop, I feel much more comfortable in a 787 than a Challenger, especially going there against the prevailing wind.

  • @dcmgiri160
    @dcmgiri160 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    USA,given many typd of areo engine to transport,civil aircraft but not to india,

  • @miker3298
    @miker3298 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    China and Russia don't get a mention!

  • @Goofy-mi8ly
    @Goofy-mi8ly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    gorborgorbor

  • @christianvalenzuela225
    @christianvalenzuela225 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This guy forgett russian engines.... what intention? Its evident, payed by some western country(s)

  • @amitmadaan8119
    @amitmadaan8119 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    rolls royace best

  • @markhill9275
    @markhill9275 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best Jet engine Rolls Royce, best car in the world, Rolls Royce. Although the Septic Tanks wail and cry, the Brits beat them! When you say something is the best you say it's the Rolls Royce of.....

  • @dcmgiri160
    @dcmgiri160 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Now,all EU,UK,USA,RUSSIA,BRAZIL offering all types of aero engines for jet fighter aircrafts, civil,transport,helicopter aero engines, tank , ,now offering to India, because, business camedown,india offering less cosg then mord Doller exchange by all others

  • @grandnagus5851
    @grandnagus5851 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    With P&W and Rolls Royce having significant issues with some of their products, it's hard for me to choose a favorite.
    In theory the best product should be the one that fits the customer the best, and has the lowest fuel burn and is the quietest.
    That being said, a product that is all that, but has issues, and prevents airplanes from being delivered or grounded as a result, can't be good.
    The quality of the overall product "jet engine" needs to become better, we've seen way too many issues over the last few years, in my opinion.

    • @tonylam9548
      @tonylam9548 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When I fly, I prefer not to sit within 45 degrees of an engine. It really ruin your day if you have a turbine blade ending up on your lap, after it went through the back of your seat. For the rear of the engines, the wing give another layer of protection.

  • @watashiabdul
    @watashiabdul 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Heii!! Come on, make this TH-cam channel for Indonesian, or at least have Indonesian subtitles, I'm from Indonesia, I really like the content of this channel and I've subscribed

    • @euloge996
      @euloge996 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Brev, do you think they will add Indonesian before languages like french or Spanish +you can even translate the subtitles

  • @mariododik9944
    @mariododik9944 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tell the real truth. These are actually Mitsubishi, Kawasaki, Sumitomo. In the case of Rolls Royce. And Ishikawajima Harima and Safran (Snecma) in the case of General Electric. General Electric and Rolls Royce are just names that sound nice, but someone else is responsible for that success. Your partners will tell you about that. But it should be emphasized that partners account for 80% of the success with which you like to brag that it is exclusively yours, Americans and British.

  • @BStrapper
    @BStrapper 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Here is a breakdown of Rolls-Royce's underlying revenue by segment in 2022:
    Civil Aerospace: £5.7 billion
    Defense: £3.7 billion
    Power Systems: £4.3 billion
    The company's total revenue in 2022 was £13.7 billion
    CFM's revenue is derived from the sale of engines, spare parts, and maintenance services. The company's largest customers are Airbus and Boeing.
    Here is a breakdown of CFM's revenue by segment in 2022:
    Engine Sales: $13.7 billion
    Spare Parts: $4.0 billion
    Maintenance Services: $2.3 billion
    The company's total revenue in 2022 was $20.0 billion.
    Here is a breakdown of Pratt & Whitney's revenue by segment in 2022:
    Commercial Engines: $11.6 billion
    Military Engines: $4.6 billion
    Aftermarket Services: $1.1 billion
    The company's total revenue in 2022 was $23.3 billion.
    That means Rolls Royce is Lagging CFM by a long shot.... and does not rank number 2 and not even number 3 but number four.
    Another case of British delusion of Grandeur ????
    YES I do trap BS.

    • @gavinbissell8847
      @gavinbissell8847 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rr don't do narrow body commercial airplane engines and where are their spare parts/ maintenance numbers?

  • @Rasscasse
    @Rasscasse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love simple flying videos.
    It is rare that I criticise, but the choice of background music which actually is not background music, because it’s competing against the voice level of the narrator is shockingly bad.
    The choice of music is just naff, like the cheesiest elevator music ever, but cranked up to 11 when the narrator voice level is 7.
    Seriously, the last 2/3 minutes or so of this, I had difficulty concentrating on what the narrator was saying.
    It completely ruined the end of the video for me.
    If it is the producers’ son who got a new keyboard for his birthday in October and he’s desperate to show his talents, I’m sorry, but this is not good enough.
    I could do better background music for this video myself. And I’m not even a trained musician.
    Narrator content first class
    Background music content woeful
    Background music level must do much better

  • @rixar139
    @rixar139 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ☘ Irish Honey Badger - Richard McGinnis here, attempting to receive my pension from GE to a new account.

  • @mdrubel5727
    @mdrubel5727 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    USA my dream country. Go ahead

    • @mariododik9944
      @mariododik9944 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tell the people the truth who is grateful for your America the land of dreams. Japanese and French and other countries that design and manufacture 80% of parts for General Electric. GE is just a name. This is where American success is minimal. All parts are designed and manufactured outside of America. In America, they just fit into one whole.

  • @MichaelM-uw3mk
    @MichaelM-uw3mk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've never heard a more disingenuous "share your thoughts in the comments" than this channel.

  • @rossnolan2883
    @rossnolan2883 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome 😎