Deconstructing Devduttology of Devdutt Pattanaik | Presentation & Analysis

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 50

  • @fabofabo5519
    @fabofabo5519 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I purchased a lot of his books, but when i came to know that he was not what he portrays, i dumped all the books in a bin unmindful of the price i paid to purchase them.

    • @sparklinglotus
      @sparklinglotus ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well done. Toilet rolls are more valuable than this guy's books.

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว

      And what he is not?

  • @alkasharma4701
    @alkasharma4701 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great analysis by two respectable and erudite scholars 🙏🙏🙏

  • @pattamadaiksivaswami9454
    @pattamadaiksivaswami9454 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    #DevdhutPatnaik is a Fraud who twists truth to his Convenience..
    Don't ever bring him to Sangam Talks

  • @nareshjadhav6834
    @nareshjadhav6834 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    His books are on sales counter on airports , what is to be done to counter their marketing policy is important.

  • @BharatS7749
    @BharatS7749 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    He so confidently said in his show that Draupadi was an unwanted girl child so much so she doesn't have her pet name like Seeta, Radha, etc.
    Draupadi has her name and it is 'Krishnaa'. And he calls himself scholar.

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bhattacharya said that. Why are you lying?
      www.manushi-india.org/pdfs_issues/PDF%20144/Panchkanya%2019-30.pdf

  • @pragasanarchary2980
    @pragasanarchary2980 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Strange that devdutt finds Hinduism as extremely violent ,because as per karolina goswami a recent international survey indicates Hinduism to be least violent among the major religions. So his view is contradictory to that of the majority in the world.

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nope, he talked about Hindus not Hinduism, not contradictory.

  • @6ygfddgghhbvdx
    @6ygfddgghhbvdx ปีที่แล้ว

    Acording to viseshika Dharma is गुण।

  • @armylover-tz9on
    @armylover-tz9on ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What do you think about aadipurush

  • @viralvieralmehta8613
    @viralvieralmehta8613 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When a person dose not understand meaning of word hindu, dharam, and dharmic what is the point of talking about such person and give him more importance but anyway for his knowledge I give some explanation below for him to realise dharam is not mythlogy but mythlogy is one small part of sharing knowledge of dharam and there is nothing like hinduism thus it can not be a religion and dharam is not a relgion , fact is dharam and relgion do live in the same universe of human minds .
    Word hindu is very clearly explained I puranas. This word means " one who has or is trying to remove negativity from within like excessive and perverted lust , krodh ( feuriocity) or exessesivs green or accsesive ego or altered ego ( ahankar ) , jealousy through process of using dharam tatawa in meditation is a hindu ". Such dharam tatwa are also known as hindu tatwa or hindutwa .
    Working conclusion on defination of dharam to be used as platform ( its not possible to define the indefinable thus working conclusion ) is ....
    Dharam is a vessel which holds the laws of Cosmos within . This is a larger understanding in context of the universe .
    For minute understanding for humans on earth ..
    Dharam is the fusion of philosophy, sprituality and theories on the truth of existance and over the milenias dharam has evoloved 360 degrees to consist philosophy ( upanishad) theories ( bhagvat gita ) sprituality ( yog ) mythlogy ( shiv puran etc ) , mathamatics , bottony, human biology , music , art , drama , peotery, history , quntom mechenics , physics , chemistry, astronomy ,astrology and above all extraordinary languages which all togather have shaped the culture of bharat and way of life . In our way of life on one side blind faith and belief on the supream like abrahmic relgion but minus any dictate or threat or carrot and without desise of suprioriety complex . On the other hand there is logic , theory and philosophy thus a hindu has an option to walk any path he chooses once he becomes a hindu which leads him to become Arya ( a person with Nobel intentions ) .
    Main base for dharam is singularity or advaitum, cyclical universe and life and law of karma and bhakati along with search for the supream being within .
    The concept of manifestation and not creation from a singal point called brahmanan sybolised with OM is what I suppose led steaphan Hawkins to his big bang theory just like modern day quntom mechnics is derived from singularity concept in vedas . This concept of nothing to everything also has led to theiry of multipal forces manifesting first resulting in the existing universe . Thease forces are known as ishwars which are shiv shakati ( conciouness and energy ) brahmah and sarswsti (knowledge and its container ) Laxmi anx vishnu ( matter and the balancer)
    Brahmann is also called param atma or maha vishnu .
    And thease forces to understand them better are picturised in human forms as well as it is much easier to focus and meditate keeping in mind a human form while meditating ( ir any form rather then focusing on nothing ) . Meditation eventuly leads you to nothing but you start with a shape or symbol . Concept of meditation is not there in abrahmic relguons thus concept of sprituality is absent from abrahmic relgion because they seek in greed materialistic rewards from God in the form of heavan while dharmics seek mokshe means merging in to the suoream being become free from this materialistic life and ordeal of life and death cycle or for abrahmic relgikns being buried for trillions of years under the earth till the judgment day when entire universe us destroyed hindus accept life is cyclical about death birth and so on and our goal should be to break away from this cycle of ordeal and merge with supream being for eternal peace and this is moksha .
    Thus this understanding is fusion of philosophy and theory and sprituality at core of dharam so where is mythlogy in this ? Fools like devdutt make everything in to mythlogy including bhagwat gita and then try to explain the sane to people. Such leftists are best left alone. Leftists morons think they are intellectuals and start behaving like one and this fasad of intellectualism traps some unsuspecting people who have limited knowledge only on their focus and they get taken away by thease fradulent morons to be revered as great intellectuals. Prime example is Carl marx

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว

      All Dharmas are myth. Jain Dharma is dying and will die. Dharma is not religion. What is the definition of Dharma? Please provide the verse that gives the definition of who is a Hindu?
      hindutva has nothing to do with Hinduism. Please provide scientific experimentation as evidence that what you have written is not a myth. You will be surprised to know that what you have written, people outside don't believe in that.

  • @rohitsharma-jf8fr
    @rohitsharma-jf8fr ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jai shree Ram Jai

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว

      Be a Hindu not a Brahmin. Jai Sita Ram.

  • @log4john
    @log4john ปีที่แล้ว

    Devdutt engages in a rigorous examination of Hindu sacred texts, whereas Hindu orthodoxy, like many other religious traditions, tends to resist such analytical approaches. This fundamental difference often leads to conflict.

  • @Sunny-rh6ik
    @Sunny-rh6ik ปีที่แล้ว +3

    👍🙏

  • @ABhattacharya
    @ABhattacharya ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Violence is endemic to Hinduism?? What does DP smoke?

  • @bharatpandit4796
    @bharatpandit4796 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That makes Devdutt Patnaik an intellectual charlatan!

  • @user-pm4pl5hh9m
    @user-pm4pl5hh9m ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This Devdutt is one extremely shallow and ill-read person - I've read that he has no knowledge of Sanskrit - so his works can best be described as interpretations of writings by writers who themselves are possibly occidental in origin, leftist and evangelical in practice, and Hindu-phobic and anti-India in persuasion.
    He is popular because he is one deviously intelligent writer: he knows his popularity lies in slanting his simplistic writings in a form that is easily digestible, and embraced, by an equally ignorant segment of society who are economically well-to-do and need light reading. This is a segment that is also embarassed by their Indian or Hindu origins. Hence, his high sales in airport bookstores - the abode of the itinerant Macaulites from convent schools and pretensions of higher education from elite universities abroad. Devdutt speaks their language and is mighty successful at that.

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are two interpretations one which is written by Brahmins and other by Hindus. Devdutt translate what is written by Hindus. He has converted more people to Hinduism then the Brahmins of India. Nope doesnt speak their languages. He himself said that he doesnt support Brahmanism.

  • @anilkaralamangala1431
    @anilkaralamangala1431 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    DP is an useless self proclaimed expert on Hinduism, to say the least he is only ft to by heart the Abrahamic scriptures.

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not true, he has the degree. Most of things he said known to be from my parents. He doesnt claim to be an expect but a translator.

  • @harinaam5502
    @harinaam5502 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    To call DP a Charvaak is an insult to Charvaaks - they were the originals, and convinced about their philosophical ideas! DP is a fake.

    • @bingming
      @bingming ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would agree, he is unfit to even be Cārvāka and may not even be familiar with the darśana. Jayarāśi (author of Tattvopaplavasiṃha, supposedly a Cārvāka), Purandara, Ajita Keśakambalī etc. were all extremely brilliant, learned and erudite people. They were firm in their rejections and arguments.

  • @ManOfSteel1
    @ManOfSteel1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    devlok ki dono host ko webseries me hot role karna pada. this is proof that his teachings are nothing but gimmick past time for the rich but no knowledge.

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว

      File a case.

  • @Vssk7
    @Vssk7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr. Devdutt Pattanaik is hardly an intellectual. In all his conversations he speaks gibberish like your truth, my truth and everyone’s truth..!

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Satya is always subjective. All Hindus do not believe in the same the truth. That is fact not gibberish.

  • @user-lp9vz6lu3t
    @user-lp9vz6lu3t ปีที่แล้ว +2

    not all he say is wrong there is some gravity in his opinion there may be a issue in way with which he presents it all i want to say is his intention is good and he's not a Marxist or charvac,

    • @descendantofbharatbharatva7155
      @descendantofbharatbharatva7155 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lol, you still aren't aware of his connotation which he indoctrinates through his works

    • @user-uq6ic8pw8x
      @user-uq6ic8pw8x ปีที่แล้ว

      He is still a soft spoken propagandist trying to pacify Hindus which exactly the Muslim and western world wants us to be

    • @Contractor48
      @Contractor48 ปีที่แล้ว

      Like what?

  • @the_sambar_vada
    @the_sambar_vada ปีที่แล้ว

    Bruh

  • @sparklinglotus
    @sparklinglotus ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Guy is a container full of alcohol and his own crap. Should be put behind bars for misinformation.

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว

      File a case.

  • @vikramnalawade626
    @vikramnalawade626 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whatever is being said in this discussion is totally false
    I think this is a resistance of Brahmins against a non brahmin pattanayaka

  • @rehaanrizwick
    @rehaanrizwick ปีที่แล้ว +1

    instead of criticising devdutt, why don't you teach your own interpretation and share your knowledge. Saying devdutt is this and that does tno achieve anything.

  • @Contractor48
    @Contractor48 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This isn’t good enough. You guys need to step up your game. Your rebuttal is pretty bad.
    For example, the example where Ram exiled sita is a part of Uttara Kanda. It is considered an addition to the original 6 chapters by valmiki. And it was mostly written in 5th or 6th century.

    • @vinsin328
      @vinsin328 ปีที่แล้ว

      Their rebuttals are always bad. Main problem is even in the age of internet people will not check the verses on the net.

    • @Contractor48
      @Contractor48 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vinsin328 I saw vaad channel. It had some of the nicest conversations that I came across if you know Hindi. Over there, one archeologist was trying to dig.
      Based on his findings, the Gupta period was one of the periods where major changes to Hinduism happened. The rigidity of the varna system, Ramayan updates and etc.

  • @rudraksha9330
    @rudraksha9330 ปีที่แล้ว

    After all he is Bengali, every body knows more than 50% are traitor,he is one of them

    • @Kaito028
      @Kaito028 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who told you he is Bengali ?