Top Attack 155 BONUS In Ukraine

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ม.ค. 2023
  • On 4 January photos of a 155 BONUS submunition were shared by a Russian Telegram channel. In this video we take a look at this interesting top-attack munition and it's capabilities.
    Be sure to check out our accompanying article for this video here -
    armourersbench.com/2023/01/06...
    If you enjoy our work please consider supporting us via Patreon, TAB is a viewer supported channel and any help is very much appreciated! We have some great new perks, check out our Patreon page here: / thearmourersbench
    You can also now support us with one-time donations via ko-fi.com/armourersbench
    Ever wished all the best gun history content creators were gathered in one place? Check out - surplused.com - we're on there!
    Where to find TAB:
    armourersbench.com
    / armourersbench
    ko-fi.com/armourersbench
    / thearmourersbench
    / armourersbench
    utreon.com/c/Armourers-Bench
    imgur.com/user/ArmourersBench
    / discord
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 1.4K

  • @TheArmourersBench
    @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Thanks for watching everyone. Be sure to check out our accompanying article for this video here -
    armourersbench.com/2023/01/06/top-attack-155-bonus-in-ukraine/. Thanks - Matt

    • @KillerCuddles-fc6kg
      @KillerCuddles-fc6kg ปีที่แล้ว

      USA needs to stop supporting both sides of this war.
      ....
      Pick a side or GTFO

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว

      And how is the US supporting Russia my dude?

    • @KillerCuddles-fc6kg
      @KillerCuddles-fc6kg ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TheArmourersBench russia's total GDP is 65% oil.
      If we started pumping in USA, it would drop gas prices and actually have an effect on russian economy... . . Instead we are buying russian oil indirectly... They are sanctioned and have to sell for less, but they are still making loads of money because Brandon jacked up the prices so high. it's his greatest accomplishment.. The Saudi's are loving this war

    • @ttp_007
      @ttp_007 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Designers failed to develop a detonation chamber into the electronic brains of the Bonus 155mm to prevent enemies from finding and studying it.

    • @victor6814
      @victor6814 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@ttp_007 source ?

  • @dragonsbreath1984
    @dragonsbreath1984 ปีที่แล้ว +586

    The US used to have these in our arsenal. They were called SADARM and they were quite nasty. The submunitions could talk to each other so they wouldn’t double task on the same target. And, they could also modify their explosive effect to either frag for soft targets and infantry or they could jet for top armor attack. The Army and Marine Corps lost these munitions due to political in-fighting with the Air Force. The argument was that the SADARM capability crept into the Air Force core mission of tactical air support.

    • @Revener666
      @Revener666 ปีที่แล้ว +197

      Well that is an irrellevant argument is I've ever heard one.

    • @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791
      @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      If they are still sat in a warehouse somewhere they should defo be sent to Ukraine.

    • @aloeisthestuff9622
      @aloeisthestuff9622 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like the Stupid US.

    • @piprix4293
      @piprix4293 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      wow weird logic if true, but idk knowing military bureaucracy it can be a circus
      imagine then armies shouldn’t field artillery or mortars or surveillance drones or tanks since their jobs can be done by aircraft…..

    • @user-vp9lc9up6v
      @user-vp9lc9up6v ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Revener666 everything sort of has its purpose, just like how Marine and Army attack helicopters operate differently in support of an element

  • @FXGreggan.
    @FXGreggan. ปีที่แล้ว +317

    I don't know if they have the same charge but are also available for 120mm mortar named STRIX. Just imagine how devestating a mortar team can be on advancing armor...

    • @SonsOfLorgar
      @SonsOfLorgar ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Yup, and that one has a solid state rocket booster option too, extending the range from 7km to almost 9km...
      (I've fired them myself in trsining back in 2003)

    • @tbrowniscool
      @tbrowniscool ปีที่แล้ว +31

      It's amazing, fucking awful to face. Even knowing these exist will make tank crews cry (This doesn't include Russians, they are told they are wiping out Nazi's, they are happy with dying for nothing)

    • @mostlymessingabout
      @mostlymessingabout ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SonsOfLorgar STRIX is laser guided only right?

    • @sparrow9990
      @sparrow9990 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Oh God imagine the Amos using this thing

    • @uniformmike05
      @uniformmike05 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The 120mm STRIX is a terminally guided mortar round with a HEAT warhead, it’s guided by heat signature of a target. Its effect on a target is devastating.

  • @Case16710
    @Case16710 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    And now it’s time for the BONUS Round!

    • @beardymcbeardface69
      @beardymcbeardface69 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Tell 'em what they've won Ron!
      *_IT'S_* *_A_* *_NEW_* *_COFFIN!_*

    • @certaindeath7776
      @certaindeath7776 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@beardymcbeardface69 good old soviet steel coffins, where the incineration of the bodies is icluded feature in the ammo storage below the turret crew.
      So russian goverment can tell its people: "na they did not die, we just cant find them anymore, im sure they are there somewhere. we only lost 10k men"

    • @telemachin
      @telemachin ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You have to say it with a french accent. 🥖

    • @1337fraggzb00N
      @1337fraggzb00N ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@beardymcbeardface69 but wait! There's more!

  • @_Saracen_
    @_Saracen_ ปีที่แล้ว +96

    Good lord, I'm both terrified and impressed.

    • @OpenGL4ever
      @OpenGL4ever ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Before the Ukraine war, I didn't even know that such ammunition even existed. Projectiles that steer to the target at the end of their flight, yes, I thought of something like that, but definitely not of those parachute things that then calmly look for the target within a radius of 200 m and only then destroy it.

    • @vladimirassalukas6726
      @vladimirassalukas6726 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@OpenGL4ever it is electronics, EMI probably will damage it quite good, it is interesting how RF conteract such type of armory. i tend to believe they have type of weapon for that case, it is stupid to think, who have rocketery that fly over land and hit marketed targets, do not have anything against such toys :)

    • @Flumphinator
      @Flumphinator ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@vladimirassalukas6726 looks like the entire thing is shielded.

  • @lando8913
    @lando8913 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    I'm really surprised how far it can shoot that jet and still pierce thick armor. Impressive all around.

    • @professionalfire3902
      @professionalfire3902 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      It's not a jet like HEAT shells. It's a roughly-formed metal 'slug'. So it works as a kinetic penetrator.

    • @juhanivalimaki5418
      @juhanivalimaki5418 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Still pierce", actually that's another explosive ignited like 100m from the tank, carried chemical energy, so it's not surprising. But I regard surprising, that despite of the recoil of that second explosion in the air, the kinetic penetrator still keeps the correct aim.

    • @chost-059
      @chost-059 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@professionalfire3902 thats also what HEAT is

    • @professionalfire3902
      @professionalfire3902 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chost-059 It's the same principle, just different angles (amongst other things).

    • @ackerkartoffel8627
      @ackerkartoffel8627 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      how do you shoot a slug without a barrel?​@@professionalfire3902

  • @JMiskovsky
    @JMiskovsky ปีที่แล้ว +291

    IT would be expensive but : Whole bettery of Pz2000 could in minute anhilate whole tank brigade.

    • @prfwrx2497
      @prfwrx2497 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      Compared to the tanks destroyed, it's nothing.

    • @tielemaniak
      @tielemaniak ปีที่แล้ว +32

      We use the SMArt 155, not the BONUS. Similar concept.

    • @ame7165
      @ame7165 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      these would be prefect for the russian/belarussian front from the north if that ever happens

    • @HingerlAlois
      @HingerlAlois ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Germany delivered SMArt 155 which are very similar. The German submunitions use parachutes and scan with infrared sensors and a radar for targets around them.

    • @IFarmBugs
      @IFarmBugs ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is exactly how Ukraine can spearhead pretty much anywhere it wants, we have an upper hand in precision artillery systems. The possibly to end the war this year is there. But unfortunately AFU high command is inept and does not use resources properly. If the war ends then how will Zelenksy and his jews make money?

  • @exo068
    @exo068 ปีที่แล้ว +361

    SMArt 155 also uses a millimeter wave radar both passiv and active. Thanks to that it can’t be stopped detecting the target even if it has reduced thermal signature or is hiding in multi spectral smoke.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Yes I believe it does. There's been a few videos suggested to be it but never ones I would consider conclusive. Another capable system.

    • @Mr.Chlorophil
      @Mr.Chlorophil ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@TheArmourersBench Most likely. Lida is easily affected by dense fog, rain and snow, unlike the milimeter radar.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I believe Brimstone uses mmw too.

    • @exo068
      @exo068 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@TheArmourersBench yes but it’s way more powerful and the largest versions can also be laser guided.

    • @Mr.Chlorophil
      @Mr.Chlorophil ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Ther german article regarding smart155 is much more detailed than the english one: "The two submunitions spiraling down the parachute autonomously scan the target area for targets with their triple seeker sensors. The sensor algorithm is said to be able to detect armored combat vehicles, distinguish them from false targets and engage them even under difficult environmental and weather conditions"

  • @mattfleming86
    @mattfleming86 ปีที่แล้ว +170

    I'm most impressed with the accuracy, stability, and range of that EFP. It appears it can reach as far as 200m by the one diagram? In the footage they are quite high when they pop. Long range AND fired while spinning rapidly well above the target. Well done.

    • @kristofferkaaling8795
      @kristofferkaaling8795 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It's the target zone, 200 meters in diameter it can hit anything. So the artillery folks need to know where about the tank or other vehicles are and fire on them and the Bonus goes after the vehicle that the crew have designated as a target.

    • @mattfleming86
      @mattfleming86 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kristofferkaaling8795 If the radius of the "zone" is 200m, then one would assume that even with a WIDE wobble creating a broad detection cone, that the efp could potentially fire from up to a couple hundred meters away. That said objects on the very outside edge of that zone may be more of a hail-mary pass with impact velocity going up as the target approaches the center of the cone.

    • @kristofferkaaling8795
      @kristofferkaaling8795 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@mattfleming86 the round it self goes far out. You do not use an artillery system to reach 200m out. The range of the bonus round is 35km.

    • @kristofferkaaling8795
      @kristofferkaaling8795 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mattfleming86 just Google the thing. No use in arguing about it here.

    • @zoiders
      @zoiders ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You mean the footprint of each munitions sensor which is roughly 178x178 meters.

  • @jools2323
    @jools2323 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    I'm pleased I'm too old to be a soldier.

    • @J-DDR3I
      @J-DDR3I ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm fro that the insurgents in Afganistan didn't have drones!

    • @aloeisthestuff9622
      @aloeisthestuff9622 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Not in Russia.

    • @VickersDoorter
      @VickersDoorter ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@aloeisthestuff9622 You beat me to it.

    • @tigerpjm
      @tigerpjm ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, I'm ex (Australian) tank crew.
      I'm glad I'm out of those tin-can death traps. Can't believe I felt so invulnerable in them!

    • @tomwi_since2015
      @tomwi_since2015 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And the saddest thing is, it really has to be us! the human race will never learn ! there will always be wars as long as there are people. even after the worst wars in this world, global peace only lasted for two or three generations. people forget very quickly when the generations that have experienced these terrible things first hand are gone. the reasons are always the same.

  • @JamesLaserpimpWalsh
    @JamesLaserpimpWalsh ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Bonus is such a wicked name for it. Thanks for the vid.

    • @LordOceanus
      @LordOceanus ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Congratulations Russian soldier we have a BONUS surprise for you! Step outside and see what you've OneFiveFive!

    • @UserUser-ww2nj
      @UserUser-ww2nj ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@LordOceanus And the bonus question is
      How long can you stay alive ?

    • @andresmartinezramos7513
      @andresmartinezramos7513 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LordOceanus If he steps outside the vehicle, he MIGHT have a chance

    • @alex-ragnarson3482
      @alex-ragnarson3482 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      BOfors NUtating Shells is the name, 22000 euros piece

  • @cmh6122
    @cmh6122 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Spent three years with a M109a3 battalion at Ft Sill after OCS and FAOBC. Too see the things we tested coming to fruition almost 4 decades later is proof that Artillery is the King of Battle.

    • @bradcloud7670
      @bradcloud7670 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This thing is an unbelievably powered weapon system. About 20 years ago, I saw a "Future Weapons" (show) episode where they showcased some of this technology. It was a cluster munition missile though. It was said to be a "13 stage weapon" It deployed many sub-munitions, that then deployed more, that oscillated, tracked, communicated between each other, and used EFPs as well.
      It was said to be used to destroy entire armoured columns. However being a cluster munition I dont think it was legal. It was very cool to see brought into the 155MM BONUS system. I think this gives it a great ability to be used on smaller scale and be upscalled as required (fired from a battery of artillery at the time),
      The only downside i can see is the 35km range but that still is good. One person mentioned putting it on the HIMARS or MRLS. Makes you not want to be inside that tank!
      If you saw any of the Armenian/Azerbaijan war, they used small drones that targeted enemy armor and towards the mid/end you would see guys refusing to be around vehicles, and super spread out, because they would also bomb groups of soldiers.
      I cant imagine being in that position.... Fuck war.

    • @tarkitarker0815
      @tarkitarker0815 ปีที่แล้ว

      dude, you were a us dude, you did test shit with bofors or rheinmetall subammo. also, albeit you might thinking you us americans were the ones with the idea, you werent.

    • @tarkitarker0815
      @tarkitarker0815 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bradcloud7670 bonus actually is just as old as the us cluster ammo you have seen, the us were neither the first on it, nor the ones bringing the 2nd gen tech.

    • @bradcloud7670
      @bradcloud7670 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tarkitarker0815 Yes I am aware BONUS is very old. I just wasnt aware that it used EFPs. From what I understood years ago, it was just a highly accurate 155MM round.
      Has it always used EFPs?

    • @tarkitarker0815
      @tarkitarker0815 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bradcloud7670 yes, it was always a projectile without an explosive load, or more like, without a explosive load that is meant to directly damage. there were many demonstrations against bonus and smart as they are effectively clusterbombs that fit into a only somewhat legal spot.

  • @davidphillips8674
    @davidphillips8674 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I've been subjected to the copper explosively formed projectiles used in these rounds when I was in Iraq. Its devastating and also terrifying once you know what they can do. We're talking a molten copper projectile going mach 20 right at you, and whats left over is not pretty( i was a medic)

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome to human flesh meeting a HEAT shell. Does wonders against armor and not so wonderous things to the human body.

    • @haley746
      @haley746 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      HEAT shells (I'm assuming RPGs in your case) are not EFPs, and molten copper is a myth (melting temp of copper < melting temp of steel, so it will not help penetrate armour). It's the sheer energy of the shaped charge explosion that does the most damage

    • @SilvaDreams
      @SilvaDreams ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@haley746 It's the focused shockwave of the high explosive that liquifies the copper focusing cone as well as the steal ((and other layered armor) that gets sprayed into the crew compartment of the tank. So no it is not the copper itself ""melting" it's way through so much as it's just being turned into a jet of molten copper and steel purely from the pressure which creates the heat.

    • @jarkkohaimakainen2378
      @jarkkohaimakainen2378 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SilvaDreams EFP's don't necessarily liquefy the "squirted" copper lining when ignited:
      "the copper jets are well below the melting point of copper. However, these temperatures are not completely consistent with evidence that soft recovered copper jet particles show signs of melting at the core"
      Tantalum is superior to copper when it comes to effectiveness of EFP lining materials and tantalum's melting point (3017 °C) is much higher than that of copper (1084.62 °C):
      "it was found tantalum is superior to copper, due to its much higher density and very high ductility at high strain rates."
      A very ductile metal might "behave as a mix of both", liquid and solid, in EFP applications (maybe some form of plasma jet).

  • @brendanmeyler1641
    @brendanmeyler1641 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    It’s amazing how it can conduct targeting while spinning so rapidly and shoot the jet so accurately from such a distance and it still be effective.

    • @sillysad3198
      @sillysad3198 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      actually spinning the whole machine at a known rate simplifies the targeting mech. and is used in rocketry since the very first "seeking" missile (when the electronics of the time could not solve the targeting task without spinning)

    • @tikitaka1148
      @tikitaka1148 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Everything is possible when its not human

    • @sillysad3198
      @sillysad3198 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@the.bog. it doesn't "eliminate" an axis, it converts the coordinate system into a polar coordinate system (all dimentions preserved) which eliminates the ARTIFACT-rotation that inevitably emerges from the composition of course corrections expressed in a cartesian system.

    • @sillysad3198
      @sillysad3198 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@the.bog. btw, the ground radar systems (albeit unable to spin as easily as rockets) also spin around the axis of the beam!
      (usually by rotating the polarisation of the beam)

    • @drobichaud1000
      @drobichaud1000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sillysad3198 Shut up sad

  • @paulosabib
    @paulosabib ปีที่แล้ว +116

    I remember very well a Q&A question for the Chieftain about what he feared the most, where he complained about those types of ammunition: "What am I supposed against it?" He asked...

    • @brettbaker5599
      @brettbaker5599 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      @Peter T Except your unit has to have one, and have it emitting when you get fired on......

    • @simonmoorcroft1417
      @simonmoorcroft1417 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      @Peter T No one is towing a C-RAM on its 40ft trailer around on the battlefield though are they Peter???

    • @kubagra456
      @kubagra456 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @Peter T Yeah... now protect every tank (expesically ones close to frontline) with C-RAM aganist chance of getting hit by rare 100k USD round while being any country that isnt USA

    • @schmiddy8433
      @schmiddy8433 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @Peter T oh yeah let me just mount a whole ass CIWS to the top of my tank lmfao

    • @UserUser-ww2nj
      @UserUser-ww2nj ปีที่แล้ว

      @@schmiddy8433 Harsh but true 😂😂😂

  • @19MAD95
    @19MAD95 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    This is one of that most amazing engineering feats.

    • @carlwheezerofsouls3273
      @carlwheezerofsouls3273 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      its like shooting a 3 stage rocket at the enemy, this is practically rocket science.

    • @ryananggoro493
      @ryananggoro493 ปีที่แล้ว

      They even built smart ammo for small caliber gun which can chase human target

    • @John-mf6ky
      @John-mf6ky 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Explosives, mines, grenades, trip wires, uxo are terrifying tbh

  • @maxbowen6482
    @maxbowen6482 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Like a cute little orbital strike satellite

  • @jdogdarkness
    @jdogdarkness ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video. I love that you took the time to find the company's demonstration video. So often is that not included in videos.

  • @kebman
    @kebman ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Bofors: Swedish Metal. They know guns since forever.

    • @Sun-Tzu-
      @Sun-Tzu- หลายเดือนก่อน

      They were bought out.

  • @janinsweden8559
    @janinsweden8559 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It was invented by BOFORS here in Sweden. BONUS stands for "BOfors NUtating Shell" Development of the BONUS began in 1985 as a study project of the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration (FMV). The intent was to find a way to increase the effectiveness of artillery in engaging enemy armoured units❤

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Think I mention that. Thanks for watching

    • @mattiasdahlstrom2024
      @mattiasdahlstrom2024 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Is there only 1 video of them in Ukraine? I thought quite a fair amount had been shipped there, so where is the combat use?

    • @janinsweden8559
      @janinsweden8559 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@mattiasdahlstrom2024 Ukraine is much better nowadays about not giving too much information away.

  • @jamesjross
    @jamesjross ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Wow do they communicate with each other to select different targets? also that seemed to fire at an angle (while doing 900 rpm). It's crazy that this was developed in the late 80s.

    • @nunyadambusiness6902
      @nunyadambusiness6902 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      No, but the hornet minefield system uses the same principle with up to 6 or 8 mines & the computerized system picks a target for EACH before it fires them... 🔥...

    • @danielsestina6457
      @danielsestina6457 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@nunyadambusiness6902 yeah the original murder Hornets... those things were highly unpredictable though. I was a Combat Engineer for several years. The m93 was a great concept but bad in actual practice.

    • @jackmclane1826
      @jackmclane1826 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      No they don't. I don't know for sure with THESE here, but the pretty much identical German variant "SmArt 155" does not. Natural dispersion when releasing the Submunitions from the shell case makes sure that they find different target areas on their own. One is in the high speed drag a splitsecond earlier and falls shorter.
      This is not a shell to target an individual tank anyway. It is fired in dozens, when you know the position of a tank battalion in a certain area.

    • @certaindeath7776
      @certaindeath7776 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      i bet theese projectiles will also hit civilian vehicles, if present. but with the 200metres cones of effect, you will be firing those only at areas, where you know there are tanks anyway.

    • @jackmclane1826
      @jackmclane1826 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@certaindeath7776 I haven't tested it myself obviously, but at least the German variant "SmArt155" is supposed not to target civilian vehicles. It is supposedly capable to distinguish between different types of tanks according to one of the developers of the round that I had the chance to talk to years ago. I forgot how they do it, as it was pretty insane and I didn't really understand it.
      With weapons like that it is always unclear which tech levels were suggested as possible by the engineers, which were actually realized and which one was actually put into service at the end.

  • @nylarnameless1759
    @nylarnameless1759 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Commented on a diff video about these early french weapon photos. Your on point

  • @heeder777
    @heeder777 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The US airdrop munition CBU-97 sensor fuzed weapon operates the same way. 10 submunitions with 4 sub sub munitions or Skeets on each of the 10 for a total of 40 skeets. The fire a copper slug into the top of an armored vehicle. Quite reliable and accurate.

    • @chopchop3464
      @chopchop3464 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      cool

    • @bobthompson4319
      @bobthompson4319 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ukraine needed cub 97s when the russians where all lined up on the hi way

    • @matsv201
      @matsv201 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The issue with that is that you need air superiority. And if you are Sweden and Sovjet is attacking , you might not have that.
      I would say also, that is probobly why the Swedish weapon work so well in Ukraine. They are designs for exactly that sort of war.

  • @petter5721
    @petter5721 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Awesome video!
    BONUS (BOfors NUtating Shell)👍🏻

    • @brianhaygood183
      @brianhaygood183 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nutate: verb. Rock, sway, or nod.

    • @herpederpe4320
      @herpederpe4320 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Första gången jag ser dig skriva något annat än
      REPATRIERA EN MILJON
      Godspeed!!

  • @Trojan0304
    @Trojan0304 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very detailed breakdown of weapon, one of the best on TH-cam. Thanks & subscribed

  • @TheEudaemonicPlague
    @TheEudaemonicPlague ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sounds like a game show--bonus round. That's pretty impressive for something that looks like a paint can. The winglets are pretty neat--I'd never seen anything quite like them before.

  • @the7observer
    @the7observer ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Spinning angry satellites that shit "lasers"

  • @johnm.3279
    @johnm.3279 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Each shell weighs around 14 lbs. which is well within the payload capacity of a commercial drone.

    • @Jay.Kellett
      @Jay.Kellett ปีที่แล้ว

      Getting closer to a total "push Button" war.

  • @contingency9
    @contingency9 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That is frightenening! Very clever and the power unbelievable!

  • @danielcunningham2394
    @danielcunningham2394 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I didn't know of this thank you for sharing this. It looks impressive.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching, glad you found it informative.

  • @prime-rib
    @prime-rib ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The US produced the CBU 97 and CBU 105 going back to 1992. Each bomb had 10 submunitions which themselves contained 4 submunitions for a total of 40, individually targeted munitions. It was called the, "thousand miracles bomb" due to its complexity. I think the Ukrainians would find it useful.

  • @Thaidory
    @Thaidory 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It seems expensive only if you have never seen how many ordinary cheap rounds it takes to get a direct hit on a tank. It’s just the same money packed in less volume.

  • @bbgcars
    @bbgcars ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I WAS LOOKING FOR THE BONUS ROUND IN THE VIDEO. :)

  • @Oi999Pa
    @Oi999Pa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amazing bit of kit

  • @chuckgriffith4539
    @chuckgriffith4539 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for the post! Interesting if that is scaled to 125 or 80 mm mortar rounds .

    • @meanmanturbo
      @meanmanturbo ปีที่แล้ว +6

      There is Bofors STRIX. It works in a slightly different way, but is also a guided top attack round.

  • @Jerry_from_analytics
    @Jerry_from_analytics ปีที่แล้ว +40

    If I was show an animation of this round I'd probably say it's an "overcomplicated childish fantasy". Difficult to believe it's real ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว +17

      It's something isn't it. Wild concept in terms of the engineering.

    • @beardymcbeardface69
      @beardymcbeardface69 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      As amazing as it is, this concept has existed in a working form at least for the past 30 years.
      Take a look at the US Air Force CBU-97 Sensor Fuzed Weapon. Same kill concept, with fin spiralling shaped charge munition which triggers on engine heat signature.

    • @HayotsRoman
      @HayotsRoman ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The French used these shells in Iraq and Mali. It's not science fiction, it's technology ))

    • @Greg881994
      @Greg881994 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheArmourersBenchHonestly, 100-140 mm of armored penetration really isn't that much. I mean, Kontakt-1 ERA, alone, even arranged in a manner that doesn't allow the block/brick to make the most of its abilities, provides 100-200 mm of protection, iirc, so this kind of weapon would actually be much more devastating against Western armor, & now Russia can reverse engineer it. Great...

    • @lykatheaaflame8254
      @lykatheaaflame8254 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Greg881994 It strikes the roof of the vehicles. What kind of tank has that thickness in the roof?

  • @__ale__
    @__ale__ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting! Thank you for the video

  • @nicolaspeigne1429
    @nicolaspeigne1429 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I can never get tired of those GIAT videos man, they look so goofy now but they do their job well

  • @Damian-Church-NZ
    @Damian-Church-NZ ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That's an impressive weapon.

  • @kirgan1000
    @kirgan1000 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Loots of old Swedish cold war stuff is being used.... what next STRIX? (the mortar shell of the same consept)

    • @ezragoldberg3132
      @ezragoldberg3132 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      NLAW, Bonus, Excalibur, RBS-17, AT4. Lots of Bofors Systems in use in Ukraine right now

    • @5.56mm
      @5.56mm ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Would be great to see STRIX in action.

    • @FXGreggan.
      @FXGreggan. ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ezragoldberg3132 Maybe even JAS39 (of course not anytime soon) and RBS15 (also available with truck launchers) and later RBS15 versions can also attack land target and not just their fleet...

    • @jetaddicted
      @jetaddicted ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Swedish AND French ☝️🥸

    • @FXGreggan.
      @FXGreggan. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jetaddicted True true, all I know is it started development here in Sweden but probably needed a joint partner to realize the project, for some reason Nexter doesn't seem to have a hand in STRIX which is the same technology... perhaps Bofors holds the patent or SAAB licenses it... still neat even though it's been around for >2 decades.

  • @bradmatz4150
    @bradmatz4150 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This video was very good & informative. I’m an old nerd who loves to learn. Nice job 😊

  • @cotcotpouetpouet
    @cotcotpouetpouet ปีที่แล้ว +1

    with the fast "ceasar" howitzer, 3 minutes to stop-deploy-fire 6 shots-leave. 62mph on road, 31mph off-road.

  • @KF-qj2rn
    @KF-qj2rn ปีที่แล้ว +4

    the US had a $1M missile in early 2000s or late '90s that had around 16 of these canisters, but I'm sure was very limited and not cost effective: could've been used upon the initial invasion line of vehicles

    • @stevidente
      @stevidente ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Assault Breaker program’s Brilliant Anti Tank Munition for the ATACMs missile.

    • @peceed
      @peceed ปีที่แล้ว

      ​ @Steven Evidente Hellfire costs $125k. Cost effectiveness is comparable.

    • @tarkitarker0815
      @tarkitarker0815 ปีที่แล้ว

      the us however had not smart ammo, it seeked enemies, but enemies and thats it, and as we know every arab thats not rich is an enemy of the usa. they were normal, illegal cluster bombs.

  • @jaroslavklima4591
    @jaroslavklima4591 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I just watched 4 times todays video of masacre near Vuhledar, were brave Ukrainians repeled Russian orcs attack. On one moment was to see arty explosion above 10m sideling over orc tank.... and this after few second started to burn from inside (ammo fire). At first moment i thought it was miss but now im almost sure it was something like BONUS shot.... Orcs lost over 30 IFV and Tanks in just one clash.... great succes !

  • @chupacabra1765
    @chupacabra1765 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When your on the receiving end of something, It's always great to receive a Bonus.

  • @frenstcht
    @frenstcht ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks. That was really interesting!

  • @MrOllevarm
    @MrOllevarm ปีที่แล้ว +7

    From Karlskoga with love! :)

  • @alex-ragnarson3482
    @alex-ragnarson3482 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    France is still a master in artillery 👍🇫🇷🇫🇷 Since Napoleon

    • @Chimaera72
      @Chimaera72 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well, if I'm not mistaken, this is a BAE Systems Bofors developed munition, but I guess that if it is shot from a French artillery piece it is still impressive on the receiving end 🙂.

    • @alex-ragnarson3482
      @alex-ragnarson3482 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Chimaera72 Yep, it's a co developed France - Sweden but it's produced in France at Nexter.

    • @aitnaw5516
      @aitnaw5516 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No it was a joint venture between bofors and giat industries (french old MoD consortium) now nexter. It's 50-50 swedish and french but It's mainly used by France.

  • @adssadassssdsa3582
    @adssadassssdsa3582 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Military tech adds are the best, this Smart 155 logo animation i laugh at every time.

  • @tomsmith476
    @tomsmith476 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm surprised how far the shape charge travel the round seem to explode like Fair distance above the target very interesting

  • @joemorganeatmyshortschannel
    @joemorganeatmyshortschannel ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Awesome as always

  • @sforza209
    @sforza209 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Wtf that is some crazy ass tech! Imagine how difficult it was to develop something like this!

    • @nikpapado9785
      @nikpapado9785 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Now lets also imagine that this is an "old" tech, imagine if that was developed in more recent years

    • @carlwheezerofsouls3273
      @carlwheezerofsouls3273 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      yes, people were describing using these in training in 2003, imagine what kind of developments have been made in the past 20 years.

    • @herpederpe4320
      @herpederpe4320 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its 40 year old technology

  • @cristo6007
    @cristo6007 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    Wondering how much the Russian tankers appreciate the "bonus".

    • @Zaizz100
      @Zaizz100 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Atleast it won´t cost them anything except their lives 😂

    • @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791
      @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Russian tankists aren't even being taught how to operate their vehicle properly any more. I doubt the Russian MOD is is telling them about these horrors they're up against.

    • @benoitbvg2888
      @benoitbvg2888 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Cope cages are gonna come back in style for spring/summer 23.

    • @chucksneedmoreland
      @chucksneedmoreland ปีที่แล้ว +2

      considering the almost regular destruction of pzh 2000 and m777 by loitering munitions, I don't they are too concerned about it

    • @Ivan-bk9xs
      @Ivan-bk9xs ปีที่แล้ว +1

      this is the only bonus they're getting this year, lol!!

  • @emjizone
    @emjizone ปีที่แล้ว

    Informative. Thanks.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Marc, I do enjoy making these looks at some of the more technical systems like the Russian top attack mines etc.

  • @Sabelzahnmowe
    @Sabelzahnmowe ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice Video and interestingf Weaponsystem. Would not have thought that they detonate this high. Also how do you defend against those? Maybe with a HEL ?

    • @rfarevalo
      @rfarevalo ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can't defend against it before it fires and you can't shoot down artillery rounds. This is why artillery rules and drones get shot down.

  • @azinfidel6461
    @azinfidel6461 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Polyethylene is optically transparent to infrared, I don't think it would provide any kind of camouflage for a ground Target.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No, I think it's either bad machine translation (I don't think so) or it's just an in vain idea.

  • @MisterSiga
    @MisterSiga ปีที่แล้ว +23

    the LUL is the real bonus here :D
    Mind boggling how something that small can be so effective and accurate.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha I would like to know what that stands for!

    • @eliadbu
      @eliadbu ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheArmourersBench BOfors NUtating Shell according to wikipedia.

    • @ericko1371
      @ericko1371 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheArmourersBench In dutch it's dick🤣

    • @lsq7833
      @lsq7833 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@TheArmourersBench LUL is a French manufacturer's marking attributed to LUCHAIRE DEFENSE, a subcontractor for Nexter.
      Funnily enough on some French shells you can find the identifier "ASS" which stands for the "Ateliers de Salbris" subcontractor.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I thought I'd seen LUL on something before, excellent thank you.

  • @christophermorris7616
    @christophermorris7616 ปีที่แล้ว

    Descending from above a LiDar Shape Charge 🍃 deadly design for sure

  • @sjvche7675
    @sjvche7675 ปีที่แล้ว

    TAMS, target activated monitions, Aerojet in So. Cal. was playing with that 30 years ago.

  • @86sather
    @86sather ปีที่แล้ว +4

    i just live the name of the round… like the enemy is winning a prize :)

  • @uncuttcoffeeofficial
    @uncuttcoffeeofficial ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I could have swore I saw a video on telegram where a helicopter was taken out by some type of munition that shot downwards just like this one. I'd be willing to bet money it was some type of munition like this. Extremely interesting video. 💪🇺🇦

    • @certaindeath7776
      @certaindeath7776 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      when heli is low enough, thats certainly possible. but i guess it was not aimes at the heli, but the heli was in the wrong moment at the wrong places and took a round ment for a tank ^^

    • @uncuttcoffeeofficial
      @uncuttcoffeeofficial ปีที่แล้ว

      @@certaindeath7776 hell of a video ! Definitely the first I've ever seen of such. And I dig through these videos all day long. Crazy hit

    • @Noubers
      @Noubers ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That video was most likely an S300. Clearer angle showed the projectile being almost as tall as the helicopter. S300 has a diving terminal mode for some of its missile types.
      It's also easy to mistake a high speed air burst for an EFP as explosions, while fast, are not instantaneous and do carry some of the momentum and velocity vector that the warhead was traveling in.

    • @uncuttcoffeeofficial
      @uncuttcoffeeofficial ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Noubers okay okay thanks for info 👍

  • @peterbaker8443
    @peterbaker8443 ปีที่แล้ว

    We used to be developing an area denial system that used these munitions in a box type configuration that could be totally autonomous or monitored for enemy movement

    • @Jugement
      @Jugement ปีที่แล้ว

      Aka a Drone 🤡

  • @cwolf8841
    @cwolf8841 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ideally top attack munitions in a 120mm smart mortar Metal Storm configuration.

  • @alecdacyczyn
    @alecdacyczyn ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So this is the artillery delivered version of the CBU-97 "Weapon of 13 Consecutive Miracles".

    • @pickinthatbanjo
      @pickinthatbanjo ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty much, two skeets instead of 40

  • @superamper
    @superamper ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Imagine being killed by something with LUL on it.

  • @richardkudrna7503
    @richardkudrna7503 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like the self destruct feature needs work. I wonder if it depends on one battery ? I do hope the self destruct can be redesigned to be extremely reliable. Maybe it needs a mechanical backup ?

  • @VickersDoorter
    @VickersDoorter ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I could do with with these to create a parking space when shopping at Waitrose.

  • @Eyeless_Camper
    @Eyeless_Camper ปีที่แล้ว +15

    If there is one thing Swedes know, its how to kill Russian tanks. XD

    • @kirgan1000
      @kirgan1000 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes Bofors have been working on it before World War II, with (for that time) excellent
      Bofors 37 mm anti-tank gun, and continued....

    • @bikesfrench8524
      @bikesfrench8524 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fabrication française nexter

    • @Eyeless_Camper
      @Eyeless_Camper ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bikesfrench8524 You do realise that BONUS stands for Bofors Nutating Shell, right? You making some dont make them yours.

    • @bikesfrench8524
      @bikesfrench8524 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Eyeless_Camper 40 mm Nexter

  • @inwedavid6919
    @inwedavid6919 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Clearly the ammo looks like to have been send with Caesar and the older TRF1 too.

  • @nicksantos43
    @nicksantos43 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't think people fully sppreciate just how amazing these submunitions are in that they can identify enemy armor and fire their shaped charge at just the right moment, while spinning, to hit the target.

  • @conradnelson5283
    @conradnelson5283 ปีที่แล้ว

    Those are so awesome!

  • @bigmike3964
    @bigmike3964 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Perfect time to do some real battlefield research, to fine tune this round.

  • @user-dl2iy5yv2k
    @user-dl2iy5yv2k ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I do have a pesky squirrel in my yard…….

    • @user-iw1qn3mt7e
      @user-iw1qn3mt7e ปีที่แล้ว

      squirrels appeared on this planet before people, so we are their guests. Have respect

  • @dfpguitar
    @dfpguitar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am astonished that this could ever work. To even fet the two tumbling blobs accurately above the target seems hard enough but for then those two blobs to somehow pinpoint fix on the target and launch their own projectiles at the target, while they themselves are falling and revolving it is unbelievable.

  • @dropthehammer6484
    @dropthehammer6484 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow thank you ✌👍☝️🇨🇦

  • @Vatnikenrager
    @Vatnikenrager ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I like the fact that the BAE animation even shows it targeting what looks like a t72 lol.

    • @sergeig685
      @sergeig685 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't know your tanks, that looks nothing like the 72. The turret overhang, the number of road wheels, the extractor, etc, it is obviously an Abrams.

    • @Vatnikenrager
      @Vatnikenrager ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sergeig685 I have forgotten more than you will ever know lol, you don't know how to read..I said in the animation, not in the diagram.

  • @ME262MKI
    @ME262MKI ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I remember seeing weeks ago something similar from the orcs, their "innovative idea" was a dumb.... device of the size of a beer barrel at the side of the road and triggered by remote control or trap wire but only could hit one target and the device couldn't be hidden and no Foe or friendly detector, literally a thing from 30 years ago

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You mean this one? th-cam.com/video/8YMfaiNai84/w-d-xo.html

    • @sergeig685
      @sergeig685 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only dumb thing here is your comment. That roadside mine you described has been adopted decades ago by soviets, US, and other NATO countries. And it still does exactly what it was designed to do - ambush armored vehicles. Russians themselves have their own versions of top attack EPF smart rounds. Anything from MLRS delivered munition to a mine that launches the munition into the air like the PTKM-1R, very effective

  • @user-vl4vh4jq5r
    @user-vl4vh4jq5r 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:44 -> my backdoor after a spicy burrito!

  • @600tian5
    @600tian5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Never knew artillery could get this fancy wow!

    • @matsv201
      @matsv201 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is loads of different fancy artillery munition. There is also one system to complement BONUS, The STRIX that is a 120mm light artilery (mortar) that can fire 7-9 km ad track and target enemy armor and IFV and. APC. It have much more advanced sensors and can differentiate between hit and active vihicles and also can tell the diffrance between different vehicles. Taking out heavy vehicles like tanks first, then IFV then APC.
      They was all designed in sweden in the late 80s for a war that never came. Bonus would thin out the Sovjet armor. STRIX would target what was left, and then go in With N-law and finish of what ever survived.

  • @a13Banger
    @a13Banger ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would put my money on incorrect fuze setting or malfunction in EPIAFS before I suspected that russians had found a way to mitigate their effects.

    • @bear76009
      @bear76009 ปีที่แล้ว

      yea exactly , just like the claims the Iranians shot down one of our stealth drones. They show pictures that dont show any damage other than it broken into a few pieces. Then they claim they "hacked" it. Like its on the internet ... pfft.. Then they claim they "overrode the controls and landed it" so all these things run on crypto that cant even be broken by the NSA in real time as its a daily changed randomized encryption. By the time they broke the code its already been changed to a new one not that they could break the first one but anyway. I used to do this SIGINT/ELINT stuff and i know what we can do. What a backwards nation like Iran or Russia? Please.

  • @zcrib3
    @zcrib3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I remember seeing a promo video of the Russian version of this thing years ago. It was similar to the second variant you described with the parachute.

    • @leneanderthalien
      @leneanderthalien ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Russian version doest exits

    • @lacojanco7571
      @lacojanco7571 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leneanderthalien what is doest? Is it russian version of - it exist on paper and on invoices, but doesnt exist in real life?

    • @rfarevalo
      @rfarevalo ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no Russian equivalent.

    • @sergeig685
      @sergeig685 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rfarevalo There is whole family of Russian MLRS delivered top attack anti armor munitions. They have seen action in Ukraine, very effective. Russians do not have very many of them though. There is even a mine that air launches smart munitions, like PTKM-1R, very effective.

  • @johnholmes6897
    @johnholmes6897 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Turned that steel into butter ! Damn

  • @domelxx8379
    @domelxx8379 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing stuff

  • @joshuaworman4022
    @joshuaworman4022 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    this is very good news they have a new way to atrit russian armored vehicles. ive been wondering since the beginning of the war what will happen when russia runs out of t72s... do they just go home at that point?

    • @dukenukem8381
      @dukenukem8381 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they have 10 000 hulls that can be repaired. Acsees to iran nk algeria. Basically endless tanks.

    • @tech477
      @tech477 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dukenukem8381 we'll have fun popping them.

    • @poromafia
      @poromafia ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@dukenukem8381 But hulls of what?
      You don't just slap a new motor and a coat of paint on the carcass of a T-80 that has been sitting in a debot since the USSR collapsed.
      We have seen a ever increasing amount of T-62's operated by Russia which makes you question the condition of T-72 and T-80 tanks.
      Even Russian state went: "We will reactivate our million T-80's!", but then they started talking about activating more T-62's.

    • @dukenukem8381
      @dukenukem8381 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@poromafia around 5000 t-72 type hulls, they have full production cycle

    • @dukenukem8381
      @dukenukem8381 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tech477 godspeed

  • @ttp_007
    @ttp_007 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Designers failed to develop a detonation chamber into the electronic brains of the Bonus 155mm to prevent enemies from finding and studying it.

    • @sergeig685
      @sergeig685 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't need to. Russians and other countries have their own versions of it for quiet a while.

  • @devondetroit2529
    @devondetroit2529 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Incredible engineering

  • @SOLDTONORM
    @SOLDTONORM ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing. Of course the 155 Nuclear round might also work.

  • @gabrielteo3636
    @gabrielteo3636 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Russia: We are not fighting Ukraine. We are fighting NATO.
    NATO: Then come attack us.
    Russia: ...

    • @moos7005
      @moos7005 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then why does NATO not just role into Moscow and remove Putin?
      Surely something is holding them back?

    • @gabrielteo3636
      @gabrielteo3636 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@moos7005 "Then why does NATO not just role into Moscow and remove Putin?
      Surely something is holding them back?"
      It is called nukes.
      NATO does not want Russian land. The same cannot be said for Russia and Ukrainian land.

    • @nikpapado9785
      @nikpapado9785 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gabrielteo3636 Exactly, the rosso-brainwashed people fail to understrand that NATO is a defensive alliance. NATO cannot invade. It exists as a shield, not a spear.

    • @tenpoll
      @tenpoll ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gabrielteo3636 also, not wanting to accidentally world war 3.

    • @gabrielteo3636
      @gabrielteo3636 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tenpoll Unfortunately, the Russians have never given up till they have had 500K losses. This war will go on for another 3-5 years, the Russian economy will be wrecked and they will become another N. Korea. The only thing stopping that is a bullet for Putin.

  • @Revener666
    @Revener666 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It is also available in a mortar version.

    • @pingvinencharleswood971
      @pingvinencharleswood971 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, it is not.

    • @Revener666
      @Revener666 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pingvinencharleswood971 yes it is

    • @pingvinencharleswood971
      @pingvinencharleswood971 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Revener666 No, Bonus uses the rotationen of the shell (spin stabilized) and the sub unit to detect the target. A mortar have no rifling. Therefore it is impossible to build a "mortar version" of the BONUS system. What do you call the mortar version, mini-Bonus or? It's not existing, sorry!

    • @Revener666
      @Revener666 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pingvinencharleswood971 Sigh!
      Bofors made an attack tanks from the top shell for mortars called Strix.

    • @pingvinencharleswood971
      @pingvinencharleswood971 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Revener666 Correct that Bofors made the Strix for mortar, but this is a totally different product and hasn't any similarity at all with BONUS. To call it another "verision" is incorrect.

  • @terrystephens1102
    @terrystephens1102 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, what a fantastic weapon 👌👌👌👌

  • @marcelOberauer
    @marcelOberauer ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What you show at 7:15 was a SMart 155 submunition parachute, not a Bonus. For the quality of the video, its to big to be a Bonus submunition.

    • @othertipo
      @othertipo ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, the submunition has the size of a hatchet compared to the armor vehicle, or the size of a parachute. A Bonus round would be barely noticeable.

    • @JnSobre
      @JnSobre ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is parachute, or a very big winglet submunition 😁

  • @cheesenoodles8316
    @cheesenoodles8316 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I remember when this technology was on the drawing board....looks even more devastating in deployment. Now, the countermeasures.....

    • @russell7489
      @russell7489 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Counter Measure - Don't attack Western Nations

  • @scoobtoober2975
    @scoobtoober2975 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    FMJ what the f is that
    That round is amazing and technical

  • @shawn3701
    @shawn3701 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am impressed!

  • @niklaskristensson2231
    @niklaskristensson2231 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bonus is a Swedish product from the beginning.

    • @jorgetrincheira2120
      @jorgetrincheira2120 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      nope a Swedish AND french produsct . A cooperation of Nexter ( france) and Bofors ( Sweden).
      Nexter is well knwon for producing the CAESAR 155m howitzer .

    • @ganikus8565
      @ganikus8565 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      100 % French for its invention and creation on paper , then built by French and Swedish companies

  • @utilisateurlambda7983
    @utilisateurlambda7983 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    French present for russia's tanks. Cocorico!

  • @aramisone7198
    @aramisone7198 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Russian Smerch 300mm Mlrs is supposed to have Rockets with submunition like these .

  • @828enigma6
    @828enigma6 ปีที่แล้ว

    VERY INTERESTING!

  • @motopiknik
    @motopiknik ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thank you France and Glory to Ukraine!

  • @gottagift
    @gottagift ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The greatest discovery occurring during the 1970's for Russia was the electric bread toaster.

    • @commieprop
      @commieprop ปีที่แล้ว

      Because we had electric shaslik grills since 1960's, four parallel universes ahead of the world.