Magic Square Bruticus Transformation Sequence

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 71

  • @andreyofdoom
    @andreyofdoom ปีที่แล้ว +18

    To note: Vortex is in the toy accurate/ IDW arm mode in this video. The copter tail has another transformation in the instructions for the G1 animation accurate mode.

    • @carmanut
      @carmanut ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's actually amazing. I was wondering about it when we saw the Vortex video.

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      See? I listen!

    • @andreyofdoom
      @andreyofdoom ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Haha the funny thing is you showed a THIRD shoulder configuration mode that is actually somewhat between the two. The official one is to split the boom down the middle, and lower them so they are wider, then fold the tail tips to the inside (that you folded to the outside)@@peolesdru

    • @andreyofdoom
      @andreyofdoom ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Oh and not just your videos but also your interaction with the community is top notch!@@peolesdru

    • @riotstrike44
      @riotstrike44 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Imagine this level of complexity with the FoC Combaticons

  • @dominicfeliciano9462
    @dominicfeliciano9462 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Name: Bruticus. Faction: Decepticon. Function: Warrior. Subgroup: Combaticons. Motto:" The road to victory is paved with Autobot wrecks."

  • @ascensionindustries9631
    @ascensionindustries9631 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Well I'll be watching this video about a thousand times when I finally get these guys.

  • @jordimolina6304
    @jordimolina6304 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    No me cansaré de mirarlo artista 😎👍

  • @griffinkimball2454
    @griffinkimball2454 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One thing I noticed with brawl is that the center section of. the chest is actually on a slider, allowing it to sit flush with the rest. It can be a bit hard to get it out though, I usually end up pushing that slider with the tank turret's.

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting, but I'm not quite sure what you mean. You are welcome to send me a picture @gmail.com.

  • @MattStryker
    @MattStryker ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Such an amazing amount of work you must have put into this!

  • @eeledahc
    @eeledahc ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That's badass.

  • @josephmonroy3865
    @josephmonroy3865 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Absolutely awesome. Bruticus is my favorite combiner. However, it is a little disappointing that nobody is doing Computron or Abominus.

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Give them time. When it slows down I'll do the Maketoys Computron.

  • @bmwg35
    @bmwg35 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    epic as always

  • @srdjandimic5035
    @srdjandimic5035 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Keep em coming!

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Will do!

  • @JonCombo
    @JonCombo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Looks like you could make all sorts of alt modes.

  • @AkmalNova20
    @AkmalNova20 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Starscream: Combaticons! Merge into "BRUTICUS!"

  • @itfigurescomics6704
    @itfigurescomics6704 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Retro design 😮

  • @frankenwolf8975
    @frankenwolf8975 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There's some really clever stuff with all of these guys and I really like how seemless Brawls chest is, specifically, but oooh man that combiner kibble. I can forgive the hands and feet since, they're hands and feet, and even the thighs because I don't know where else they'd go, but it feels like they kinda gave up with the chest piece. Onslaught is doing nothing back there and the did the chest plate really need to be a separate part? You've already got a big chunk don't make it worse lol. This definitely feels a little bit worse than their Menasor because the combiner skeleton at least *did* something there. If the Stunticons weren't combined you weren't left with a massive vaguely-Menasor-looking thing, but here you are left with a large vaguely-Bruticus-looking thing.

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The front of the chest is a separate part because there is another variant of him that is more "IDW" (which frankly looks more like the original toy)

  • @DoctorPhileasFragg
    @DoctorPhileasFragg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    8:11 is that held up by a piece of modeling clay?

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's sticky tac. The black variety, although it's really more of a medium grey.

  • @fabio6243
    @fabio6243 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ❤Bravissimo

  • @DEVASTATOR478
    @DEVASTATOR478 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This Is great ! I have Devastator by magic Square version A dark violet 👍

  • @Zenith-zb8op
    @Zenith-zb8op ปีที่แล้ว +31

    I know that it’s faithful to the G1 Bruticus, but god if I don’t hate combiners that use extra parts for the hands and feet

    • @mechanwhal6590
      @mechanwhal6590 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I don’t know why every single third party insists on ditching Scramble City and adding more and more combiner kibble! Maybe just don’t?!?

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It can make the resulting gestalt more stable and poseable.

    • @nameforcomments4092
      @nameforcomments4092 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And torso and thighs and head… MMC has broken me. I’m just all in on All Built In now.
      Edit addendum: I do appreciate the other way of doing combiners, too. This one looks amazing and stable, for instance. I just don’t really want to buy them. And I know MMC’s have compromises to achieve their gimmick. I get that those compromises are a deal breaker for some. Not faulting anyone for that.
      And then there’s freaking Cang Toys. Holy crap. “Need separate feet? Let’s make some wolf-bots. Crotch? Gorilla bot. Hands? Robo-crab. No useless combiner pieces for us; we got a whole b-team of bots instead.”

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@nameforcomments4092 MMC All-Built-In is the best!

    • @theworldisending22
      @theworldisending22 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This one looks better to me than MMC especially the individual robot modes. Onslaught really didn’t look the best on MMC and this magic square Brawls legs look so much better to me just all of the bots do really lol. I used to be all for what MMC did but i really just want a stable and complex fun transformation more than anything and these have just as many steps if not probably more than those did so I love them. But I have both sets and am keeping both so I’m not hating on MMC either.

  • @rakadean39
    @rakadean39 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice

  • @JonCombo
    @JonCombo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Brawl got walking turret mode? 0:50

  • @directorscarlett1932
    @directorscarlett1932 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A legends scale Bruticus should be called 'Cute-icus'

  • @DJBarts42
    @DJBarts42 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this figure the same size as Legacy Menasor or is it bigger/smaller?

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว

      They're about the same.

  • @Alzeal07
    @Alzeal07 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    must have been quite some work!

  • @mdjstd81
    @mdjstd81 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Size of combiner mode???

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      About 12 inches.

  • @willtws9577
    @willtws9577 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I do think its silly that blast-off has the animation error head..

  • @blazeatron373
    @blazeatron373 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How big is he?

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      About 12 inches or 30cm or so.

  • @nevermoreraven4746
    @nevermoreraven4746 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    While the figures and Bruticus are all awesome, Bruticus's kibble mode kinda sucks. I guess it's supposed to be a base, but it's meh. Especially when compared to the last two.

  • @saulGjr
    @saulGjr ปีที่แล้ว +2

    damn bro. i have all of these new in box and no motivation to transform any of them. im thinking about selling off my masterpiece collection.

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว

      I found them to be a lot of fun.

  • @youdeetube
    @youdeetube ปีที่แล้ว +1

    maybe you want to upload behind the scene of making this video

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว

      I have no footage of behind the scene. I have a livestream where I recorded the process and answered questions.

    • @peolesdru
      @peolesdru  ปีที่แล้ว

      But not for this figure, tbc.

  • @wolf1701A
    @wolf1701A ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If they oversized this set like the prime ID be all over it

  • @rorroryusoul
    @rorroryusoul ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First peolesdru

  • @Iknowhowbadthisnameis8828
    @Iknowhowbadthisnameis8828 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Half of this is all partsforming, good lord what?