Hey guys, so I’d just like to say sorry my voice sounds a little weird in this video. Essentially the reason why is I have been struggling with Tinnitus for the past 6 months. For those of you who dont know it is best described as a constant ringing that is in the victim’s ear that never goes away. Whenever you’ve been to a loud nightclub or a music festival you will probably experience a ringing in your ears that goes away within a few hours. What I have is that except the ringing is much louder and it never quiets down. It is constant. It may sound like it’s not that bad but really it is unbearable sometimes. I hear it all day every day and it is at the point now where it is making me depressed and is severely limiting my productivity. Nights are the worst. You never truly appreciate something until it is gone and something as simple as silence is something everyone takes for granted. The ability to go to bed or somewhere quiet and hear nothing is something that I have not had for half a year. The silence is deafening. Right now I’m taking a course of drugs that are supposed to reduce the fluids in my ear as the doctor thinks that is the cause, the ringing is ever so slightly less noisy but still unbearable at times such as right now when I’m writing this. For those of you who dont know the ears, mouth and nose are all linked together so me taking these drugs to reduce fluids in my ears is also causing the way my nose works to shift so when I speak I sound slightly different. Not going to lie it feels pretty shit and I am 90% certain I will have this ringing and warbling in my ears for the rest of my life. But anyway don't forget to like and subscribe XD
I can imagine how terrible it is, and since imagining is usually not as bad as the real thing, I can only expect what you're going through to be a 5x as worse as what I imagine XD I'll pray that you'll find some sort of treatment that will help lessen your condition significantly, and make it a bit more tolerable to live with. Hold on there.
No matter how visibly insane and out of control a movie psychopath is shown, it will never be comparable to one who is completely composed and in control
@@theblasteffect4499 Depends on the version of the joker, the joker from The Dark Knight is completely sane, but the joker from The Joker is insane because he is psychotic.
He is a very polite man. Just don't try to stand in the way of his freedom or go after some one he respects or cares about and all should be good. Oh, also have an unhealthy diet.
You neglected to mention what is to me THE most terrifying aspect of that first shot of Hannibal standing in the middle of his cell: the camera is showing Clarice's first-person perspective and as Hannibal comes into view he's already staring _right into it._ But he obviously doesn't just spend all day standing still in the middle of his cell. He knew she was coming. He was _waiting for her._
Anthony Hopkin's girlfriend saw the movie when it came out and she was so terrified of his face she dumped him almost overnight... Plus, when the movie had its premier Hopkins would creep up to people's seats and say in a sudden, calm voice "how are you liking the film?" and scare everyone senseless. This guy is fricken awesome. great vid btw
The detail I liked about this scene is how Chilton warned her not to approach the glass, yet Lecter immediately tests her by requesting to see the badge up close. She complies, but not out of subservience. She is playing by her own rules, not Chilton’s. Hannibal respects this, as she treats him like a person and not some demonic entity.
Another way to look at things is the way the shots on hannibal's face kind of invade our personal space making us uncomfortable. And even more uncomfortable, his face looks calm... too calm.
Hannibal is like all the three inmates in one body, he’s creepy but civilized, he has no real empathy and feels no guilt, but he also has an animal side to him since he eats people, now that I think about it these traits go hand in hand throughout the movie. At first he’s cunning but terrifying like the man in the first cell, then you see his lack of empathy when told about the killer, and then you see the terrifying animal part of him when he escapes. It’s like he has these traits are balled up inside of him waiting to come out for the kill.
I would argue that Hannibal has tons of empathy. He knows exactly what people around him are feeling and he uses that knowledge to manipulate them. What he doesn't have is compassion. He knows what you're feeling but doesn't care about you other than how you might be useful to him.
Hopkins said in an interview once that he had coffee with a madman in London who he never saw blink during their lengthy conversation, so he made sure that he didnt blink whilst playing lecter.
and that's how clever Hopkins is , he learns constantly , absorbing like a sponge knowledge from any possible source , that is his real talent and the next talent is that he can reproduce it with his own charesmatic way !!!!
@spud potato that fact exactly shows how talented both are... To my opinion there is a category " the most expressive eyes" in which belong the following actors : Anthony Hopking, Jack Nicholson, Mel Gibson, Ray Liotta, Robert Downey Jr, Omar Shariff, Al Pacino... From all the above the most diverse and charismatic is mister Hopking. He can be a benevolent professor, a priest, a serial killer, a prisoner...
Something that adds to the affect is when Clarice first meets Hannibal, his eyes are in the shadows. The rest of him is bright and normal but you can’t see the eyes. It’s a “I might look normal but I have a terrible secret” feel.
Yea there was the sense that "something's not right". Everything points to him being a psychopath yet in that moment, it challenges the audience to compare what they've been told with reality, but now that doesn't tell you everything either. Even seeing Hannibal Lecture, up and down, it's in the eyes. Eyes are so compelling.
One part I love about the cinematography is how she looks like she is behind the glass, but when Hannibal is in the frame it looks like he is not. Shows how she is the one who is trapped or powerless. Great vid :)
But she aint still powerless. He is in cage and cant get out, so he has no power in my opinion, when if she does not get from him the answers she came looking for. She can move on with her life, when it seems he just didnt want to answer.
@@jout738 but the point is that she needs him, she needs his help. She can't just move on, she wants to solve the case. And even behind the glass he controls her
Hollywood back then: Who needs jumpscares when we can have terrifying Villains and good writing? Hollywood now: “who needs good writing and terrifying villains when we can have jumpscares?
I hate jump scares, seeing as they make me violent. But I love the psychological horror that keeps me at the edge of my seat without having me thrash about
@@thelatterdayarbiter This is a natural body response to a fight or flight surprise. Most people are cowardly and would run/be terrified and too afraid to act, so atleast you know your not a coward like most people.
The emphasis on "closer" even as a child I knew what he was trying to do and it absolutely thrilled me. Hopkins makes you feel like he's crawling under your skin with one word.
Something that the video doesn't mention is that while yes, when you first see hannibal lecter standing there in his cell, he's not showing any signs of insanity, to me he is terrifying anyway because he seems so... artificial. Yes he's not showing any signs of insanity but he's not normal because a normal person would just looking bored, lying on the bed, maybe reading...? However, he's just standing in the middle of his cell, unmoving, with a perfect posture. Its almost like he's TRYING to appear normal but just comes off creepy because its not actually normal in the slightest. However, he's a psychologist so it has to be intentional. The best way I can describe it is that it is like he knew she was coming and decided to do the creepiest thing he could think of, which was in fact, nothing, like an absence of any sort of traits so she couldn't read him. And that is terrifying because you have NO idea what to expect.
To me it looked too predictable. He heard her coming and therefore took that position to assert dominance. The reason he 'appears' terrifying is the incompetence of the FBI Agent who should be trained in interrogations and the fact that while she clearly was incompetent had no one with knowledge with her
Totally agree with this analysis. It's like he's attempting to look and act like a "normal agreeable" person which comes off really forced and artificial. Everything he is showing is just what he wants you to see, everything in his cell is in his control and the way he wants it to look to give the impression he is intelligent and artistic, which demands respect, controls potential conversation topics and ultimately disguises and distracts from who he really is, an insane murderer who eats people.
@@cattysplat Yes! and that is why he is humiliated when she gives him that questionnaire, or when she throws the cannibalism straight to his face. Hannibal does not like to be referred to as ON OF THOSE CANNIBALISTIC SICK BASTARDS out there. He is unique, he is the best, he is Dracula among the vampires who obviously never accept anyone referring to him as to some stupid gig from Blade.
He's standing because he knew she was coming and it would be rude to greet his guests, especially a woman, sitting down. At least this is what Anthony Hopkins says of why Hannibal is standing when Starling comes to visit him.
@@cattysplat He doesn't have to "give the impression he is intelligent and artistic". He IS intelligent and artistic as well as an insane murderer who eats people, and since he is captured, everyone knows these things about him so he doesn't have to pretend to be one thing and not the other. He was standing because in his opinion, it's rude to greet guests while sitting.
For me, he's terrifying for two main reasons; 1. He has no motivation, he kills because he is simply able to do so. 2. He is looked in that place just because he wants to. We clearly see he has massive manipulation skills, how come he didn't leave yet.
Lecter kills because he is a social critic. He kills people for being: A. Rude B. Incompetent. C. Stupid. He sees himself as cleaning up society, one meal at a time. But why eat them? Because to let them go to waste would be rude.
Actually, depending on the novel you read, Hannibal _does_ have a motivation. TW: trauma and graphic depictions of violence Second TW ⚠️ In Hannibal Rising, Hannibal and his sister Mischa were captured as children in Lithuania and taken by a group led by a war criminal. Hannibal witnesses his sister being murdered and cannibalized, and eventually discovers that he ate a part of her as well. This helps set up the pathology of why Hannibal eats people and his attempt to turn these things into some expression of ‘art’; to put things back into the world ‘better’ than he found them or to correct the blot that people like his captors put on it. He actually spends his time hunting the individual members down in the early pages of the book and learns combat from a woman named Murasaki.
The intimacy of the eye contact is unnerving. The ultra-closeups, and how both actors portray it. Jodie foster doesn't get enough credit for her acting in this scene. It's terrifying, you can feel it, but because she's standing across from Anthony Hopkin's Hannibal Lechter, it's overshadowed. More sublimation here, he steals the scene, but as you pointed out "Closer..." is asserting dominance, it also tightens the vignette. Focusing on the eye contact, the intimacy, and claustrophobia of the situation. Ironically, she's trapped, while he's standing calmly in his cell. He's comfortable, well lit, with decorated walls, while all she's got is a folding chair in a dim cramped corridor...
She was praised for her acting in this movie, everything thinks it's about Hannibal but he only has less than 15 min of screen time. When he's on he steals the show but she is great enough where your not just waiting for Hopkins to get back.
Another comment meant to misinform people. Jodie Foster won a fucking Oscar for her performance in this movie so please stop spreading this false idea that she doesnt get enough credit, that is literally the highest credit any actor can ever receive for their work.
Yep. What got me is that he was saying 'closer, closer' allegedly so that he could read her ID, but all the time she was stepping forward he was looking at her eyes, not the ID. And then he casually flicks his eyes down to the ID, reads it super-fast, back to her with, "Yeah, you're not worthy."
Their relationship is so intriguing. He doesn’t just give her information. He knows she can grow to become a better investigator and challenges her to do exactly that. Without him, she probably wouldn’t have gotten to where she wanted to be. When he brings up something from Clarice’s past, it’s for a reason. He doesn’t just do it to open old wounds. It’s give and take. He may be evil, but he’s not crude. You don’t find many villains with that much complexity these days.
Well Clarice actually falls in love with Dr. Lecter and he was in love with her on sight. The movie adaptations refused to stay true to the books wherein after Clarice saves Hannibal from Mason Verger and he saves her from the pigs she offers herself to him and they go and live in Cuba for the remaining years of their lives. So be like the Joker got into Dr. Harley Quinn's mind and heart, Hanny got into Clarice head and heart.
i definitely agree that using helpless protagonists makes it very terrifying, but in some ways I find the opposite to be true: what's more horrifying than seeing someone do everything right, everything you thought would work and keep them safe, only for it to fail in the end. they're helpless in that sense, and you'll feel the same way too. 👀👀
Sepia Smith This actually happens to the Memphis police in Silence of the Lambs, you'll notice, when Lector escapes. They make no stupid mistakes as is common in these films but they still fail.
"Lecter is our most prized asset" is actually the best line to describe him because it is the most dehumanizing line. It gives no indication that he is a person. Instead of saying "he" the doctor says "Lecter". Then, instead of saying "prisoner" he says "asset". These two words dont necessarily make what he is talkibg about a person which is why its the best.
It also serves to display the seedy, self-promoter that Dr. Chilton is. His charges are an opportunity for fame and notoriety. Clarice recognizes it right away and placates him.
It's also a great and subtle way to show how Chilton is just the worst AND it exposes the ableism he has. Even though Hannibal IS scary as hell and awful, he's still a human being and Chilton speaks of him as if his mental illness makes him an object.
Don't worry 'bout a thing Horror - an intense feeling of fear, shock, or disgust. Terror - extreme fear. There is nothing different really. I guess terror is just to terrify...and horror has other emotions rather than just to terrify.
Don't worry 'bout a thing Horror: Anxiety that spawned from your grasp of reality per se. Terror: Trauma that spawned from what other people did to you or can do to you. The difference may be subtle, but some of us unlearned to sleep from it. Edit: Sorry! I think that was sassy. I do not want to be sassy, I'd just like to get some more sleep. And I can be a real prick when sleep-deprived.
One of the earliest "frighteners" in movies, Boris Karloff - in reality a charming, cultured Englishman named William Henry Pratt - disliked hearing his movies described as "horror films". " Horror suggests revulsion, " he said. "I like to think of the movies as 'terror films' - my job is to frighten people, not disgust them." That's the difference.
4:00 it's called tasking. You ask someone to do something and if they do, then you have established a power hierarchy. Could be as simple as asking for a light (common when people smoked), a glass of water, even asking the time. It can be refused, eg by handing the other party the matches (No, light your own.) But Clarice didn't refuse and so gave power to Lecter. She could have approached the cell right away, shown the ID and withdrawn. She might even have asked 'Mind if I sit?' knowing he had no choice but to accede. That way she would have retained the balance of power. (He's basically a caged animal, she has all the aces ) Lecter, of course, would have understood what she was doing and could have upped the ante. However by playing this hand as she did, Clarice handed power to Lecter, which he was too much of a gentleman to exploit. She called out his protective instinct, in other words and throughout their relationship, Clarice maintains power over Lecter in repeated, similar power plays. He realises early on that he's met his match, which is why he never harms her, indeed becomes her protector.
An interesting thing related to this is also that in the book Red Dragon Hannibal does the same to Will Graham, asking him if he wants to sit down, but Will doesn't.
That's a pretty bad way of looking at it. It's a chicken and egg situation. Certainly without Thomas Harris this video wouldn't be made either. It takes two to tango. The constant Hollywood-esque reinforcement of actors are everything and writers are redundant is nauseating
Clarice's muscle twitching on neck and peripheral areas of her face show she's extremely nervous... before she even meets Hannibal. The emotional communication Hopkins and Foster convey is magnificent.
The reason why your viewer retention rate is so high is because you’re smart and concise and explain topics that us as the audience actually care about. We get educated in a 10-20 minute video very successfully. Thank you.
Similar effect in the exchange in "Red Dragon" between Lecter and Graham: Will Graham : No, I know I'm not smarter than you. Hannibal Lecter : Then how did you catch me? Will Graham : You had... disadvantages. Hannibal Lecter : What disadvantages? Will Graham : You're insane.
The real reason he is terrifying to put it simply... he has fully accepted and understands himself in a way most other humans can never achieve. He knows himself best.
Thing about Lecter is he is creepy as hell yet charming all the same. He’s the villain but you cheer for him and want him to win you know you’ve done something right when you make a character like this, it’s an excellent psychotic victory
That’s because we subconsciously compare him to Crawford. Lector respects Clarice and acts more like a mentor to her. He’s demented yes. But he’s brilliant and he’s straight with her. He quid pro quos with her but gives her a choice about it. He’s up front. Meanwhile Crawford is using her left and right however and whenever it suits him best in the moment. He does that thing at the funeral home where he aligns himself with the small town police and makes her the outcast little lady that it’s not decent to talk in front of. The ends justify the means with Crawford. By contrast, Lector invests in her and it’s even more evident in the book that he sees her potential and works with her to deepen her understanding of abnormal psychology. Goes much further in the book with that dynamic. He actually helps her to move toward her goal. When Hannibal finds out about the “deal” for his help being a lie, I remember feeling sorry for him! That’s one hell of a trick to pull off as an author and whoever wrote the adaptation nailed it too. Yeah I’m still trying to look under the hood of this story to figure out how Lector was made to be such a sympathetic villain- even after he has killed people on screen. Some of it probably has to do with the excellent casting of Anthony Hopkins - but not all of it.
"I'm having an old friend for dinner" is one of the truly great closing lines in cinematic history. And I ought to know because I have watched over a dozen movies in my lifetime.
What I loved about their interaction is while she does not have to fear him physically attacking her that like a room full of radioactivity the longer she stays the more at risk she is. It can be summed up with one line in the film. "Believe me, you don't want Hannibal Lecter inside your head." This is a man who knows how to worm his way into a persons head and find all their soft spots. Then knowing them he could easily use them to harm people for his pleasure. He does this with Clarice with having her recount her worst memories but the real danger is that the longer he is around you the more susceptible to his will. This can be shown by Miggs. Lecter was able to convince him to swallow his own tongue just by talking to him. Once Lecter knows you he can use what he knows to break you down completely.
That line of dialog might be the most important sentence in the film. It establishes the tension we feel for every second that Clarice spends in Lecter's presence, the fear that we have every time she's forced to give him a piece of her past as quid pro quo.
It seems obvious to me that you're getting better than average viewer retention times because you're putting together intelligent content. Your observations and conclusions make sense. Your delivery is well paced, and clear. Kudos!
Oh, I feel the scariest thing of _ALL_ is that "impenetrable" plastic you talk about. For me, after the straight-up _medieval_ iron bars containing the other hopelessly insane criminals, there seems to be _nothing at all_ between Hannibal and Clarice (i.e. _us-the audience.)_ There isn't a lot of light reflecting on the material-I wouldn't be surprised if there was nothing at all really there while filming it.
Personally, I don't find Hannibal "terrifying" at all, because he's caged. But it is like looking at a caged predator - you know it's harmless in a cage, but could tear you apart, were it to get out. Same is here - Hannibal looks at protagonist like a predator looks at it's prey. I don't agree with the video - he doesn't look normal. He looks like he's trying to look "civil", normal, but you can clearly see he's deranged. But basically all of this is a credit to the actor.
@@Gyvulys it's funny, I watched the silence of the lambs and thought "he's not believable at all, who would buy him as a normal person?" And then I watched Red Dragon and realised he was different before he got caught. Believable, as a kindly old man. so I'd say he kinda relaxed after being caught, allowing himself to be a bit wild because it kept people afraid of him. However irl, historically, serial killers don't really change their behaviour in prison. even if they admit to their crimes their ego won't allow them to take down the facade, ever. They just carry on with the charismatic act (Ted Bundy is a good example) unless they lose their mind like Manson
When I first seen him behind the bars I thought I was the one behind the bars and I felt like I was at his mercy. The hunger was oozing out of him it was palpable I was terrified as a teen. Hopkins didn't have much screen time but I was impressed immensely
“The reason why Hannibal Lecter is so terrifying is that he has all the of the power.” *'Literally every historical ruler' wants to know your location*
I'm not a horror fan, but this suspense movie had a profound effect that left me astonished as I left the cinema. I was disturbed and confused why I felt admiration for Lector. I have no desire to harm others, let-alone taste their flesh, but I concluded, it was his towering intellect, education, and sophistication. All an exterior mask, hiding a cold, calculating, coiled power underneath, with a keen focus holding it back until just the right moment, and then unleashing the demon within. It made him both terrifying and disarming. An amazing portrayal by Anthony Hopkins.
@@bodebaggins look dude, there a lot of crappy old horror movies. most movies in the genre in general are not good. besides there are modern movies i can point to as well as being really good as an example of current horror movies being high quality compared to other eras. it's so easy to build a strawman saying a past era was better than the current era when you compare the best of the past to the worst of the present. let the right one in, hereditary, lake mungo, the lighthouse, under the skin, the clovehitch killer, all really good modern horror movies that don't rely on jumpscares. if you can't find any modern horror movies that are good then you're not looking hard enough.
This scene in particular was just an absolute powerhouse of casting, directing, cinematography, acting... Just a beautiful representation of why I love seeing scenes broken down like this. Great job on explaining everything.
well..your comment had no seeming contextual reference to the video, yet you managed to get 300+ likes and even a few comments ...well, my friend, who are you?
What makes Lector so terryfing to me is the fact that he is very intelligent. There is nothing more dangerous than an insane person with a high level of intelligence since you can't predict what he is going to do and in the worst case, he might totally read you
Had the same thought. It's hard to shake the thought that he knows more than you do. In combination with a sociopathic lack of empathy, one fears not only that he'll figure out how to do what he wants but that he'll have no reservations about doing it, whatever it is...
See, Hannibal Lector is a Genius, he is manipulative and can Trick anybody, when Hannibal tells Clarice to bring the ID Closer, she obeys, this already proves, he gives commands, *others listen.*
I saw this movie as a teenage boy and I left terrified because I knew that people like this exist. Hannibalhad all the power in this movie and I was quite obvious even though it was behind bars. He was a genius psychiatrist who knew how to manipulate people
Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins never interacted between scenes. She only really saw him when he was locked in his cell on set. Made these interactions super real. Incredible performances from both actors.
im gonna be totally honest, Mads Mikkelsen (sorry if i spelled that wrong) is a spectacular Hannibal, and oftentimes makes me forget just how terrifying Hannibal actually is from time to time
While I don't fully disagree with your statement "if you want your audience to feel terrified, it has all to do with which character has the power" I think it only tells half of the story. It may sound like nitpicking but I'd say it's just as important, if not more important, to emphasize where the LACK of power is if you really want to terrify your audience. I hadn't ever really thought much about the idea of terror until you made that statement, but once I heard it I realized that terror is feeling an overwhelming sense of powerlessness in the face of a malicious presence. If you want your audience to feel terror then you want your audience to be focused on the terrorized's powerlessness more-so than you want them to be focused on the terrorizer's power. Either way though, I think this was a great video and it really got me thinking, keep up the great work!
One other thing is that in that scene often times it is shot in a way that makes it appear as if there is no glass between them and he is just standing right in front of her.
So much just in their scenes, the perspective, the dialogue, their mannerisms all to convey such a brilliant scene in cinema history that truly makes one fear without no blood or jump scare, not even music or screaming
Yes it is !!! We can find even worst psycopaths than him in politics and as CEOs in big economic groups. Their major skill is their natural hability to manipulate others and they have a total lack of empathy to other people. They are not crazy. They are evil.
@@siegfriedkleinmartins7816 I’d argue that being born with ASPD doesn’t necessarily make someone evil. Even though “evil” and morality are subjective, a person’s actions will speak for them better than anything. (I totally agree with what you’re saying, generally. I’m just writing some notes on the actual “psychopath” condition that readers might find interesting) There are some fascinating and very well written psychology papers on this. Unfortunately, legitimate information is hard to find because this is an extremely sensationalized, and poorly researched disorder. It has a weird status where it’s seemingly acceptable to make fun of it, and make money off of people affected by it. Even though life can be unbearable for some of the people effected, and an overwhelming majority don’t ever do anything wrong. It’s just an “uncanny valley” effect for most people, because a normal person can kill 5 people and no one cares, but someone with ASPD killing a single person would get more TH-cam videos, because they didn’t show an emotional response and it’s uncomfortable or creepy for most people (though, again, it’s not like someone chooses to have ASPD, just like no one chooses to develop schizophrenia or bipolar disorder). Again, statistically, most people with ASPD function normally in society and don’t cause trouble. But sometimes they go far out of the way to be helpful or even self-sacrificial because they understand cognitively that it’s the way most humans should behave. Reading the stats, you might be surprised to find that people with ASPD who avoid crime early in life (statistically highly probable if they are raised in the middle class or higher) tend to hold the most prestigious jobs like doctors, scientists, lawyers, judges, and more. Jobs that require a great deal of effort to achieve, and the ability to separate emotional bias. This can have some pretty cool effects. Just a quick example, almost all U.S navy seals are diagnosable as having ASPD. I think the statistic is somewhere between the 85-90%. Doctor Martha Stout (Harvard medical) and Professor Kevin Dutton (Cambridge/Oxford) both wrote well received studies on this. (Fun fact, Dutton was also in contact with the creators of Dexter, and Michael C. Hall read some of his research to understand the role better). But the Seals thing makes sense pretty intuitively if you think about it. A lot of the hardest Seal tests involve ignoring fear response, and additional emotional responses someone with a “typical” amygdala would have. It’s important to be able to remain emotionally distant for a bit in a gunfight, because if your friend gets shot, a “normal” person would probably lose focus on the mission and increase the chances of losing the whole team. Being much more resilient against trauma helps stave off PTSD, which, again, is important for Seals because they are constantly involved in close quarters search and destroy missions. This is a very different arrangement than most soldiers. Hope someone found this interesting.
@@juderocks5 in one thing I have to disagree with you: morality canot be relativised, good actions differ strongly of bad intentioned actions. ASPD is not what I was talking about. Real psychopats, or sociopats know exactly what they are doing, and take pleasure of it, as two kids in England, few years ago, of 9 and 6 years old, that kidnaped a baby of few months and put him on the railroad tracks, just to see him being killed by the train. At their age they knew exactly what could happened. Both were condemned to life sentence. Recently a group of 4 young murderers were condemned to life sentences because all the 4 raped and killed a young girl, after killing her boyfriend. At the court they were laughing, while their sentence was read. Now they have free food and shelter, provided by tax payers. This happened in the USA About navy seals, is well known that the military select, with the hard training and bullying, the recruits with killer instinct, and dispose of the ones that don't have. They want obedient soldiers, not people that could question orders, if they have to explode a terrorrist shelter full of innocent people used as shield.
@@siegfriedkleinmartins7816 *I'm so sorry this is long; I didn't realize until I was done* I don't think we really disagree too much, if I'm honest. (though I do have to correct the psychopath/ sociopath/ ASPD thing. I tried to be simple about it. It's all ASPD. There is no difference; we can even test for it with FMRI, watch the hot spots, and track neuronal activity. There hasn't been much debate in that area in the last 20 years or so, and it was collectively solidified with the last DSM publication). People with ASPD know what they are doing. It's not related to insanity, just a distinct range of emotional responsivity disparate to "typical" humans. Back on topic: I don't REALLY disagree with your morality statement, and here is my point of view. Relative morality is a bit of a philosophical conundrum. It's not something that we are likely ever to understand due to the unsurprisingly subjective nature of one of the most subjective topics. Some people like Sam Harris "relativize" morality by expressing it as a function directly correlated to the well-being of humans. That's a pretty good argument, and I took a Harvard Bioethics course that went pretty in-depth about that concept. But even though that point of view leans in my direction, I'm still on the fence about it because of its very nature, and I doubt there could ever be a clinical definition. As for the criminals you listed, I strongly agree with you about the moral argument in those situations. But this happens to be one instance where I have more experience than most. I was a police officer for six years, and I still work on the reserve force/SWAT as a volunteer. I've seen plenty of disgusting humans. Some were insane (diagnosably insane, like had schizophrenia or brain damage), some were high/drunk, some were probably diagnosable with ASPD, and some were "normal" humans who just did something stupid. But the worst, most disturbing crimes were frequently committed by "normal" people with anger problems. Here is my argument, and you can feel free to disagree, but I don't think we're far apart. All humans are capable of monstrous acts, regardless of diagnosis. When I said normal people with anger issues committed the "worst" crimes, what I meant was that I always had to deal with those people. It seemed like once a month, I'd see the same person involved in a drive-by shooting, a gang fight, or a revenge attack (usually over something stupid like a Facebook post). They didn't have a disorder, weren't sorry, and knew what they were doing. Instead of waiting for a lawyer, they almost always started talking before I even asked them anything and usually tried to justify or rationalize whatever they did. I've seriously had people say things like, "Look, that B*** had it coming. I told her if she didn't bring me my phone back, I was gonna set her house on fire." And they were totally serious! They truly believed they were justified somehow. I dealt with people like that practically every night at work. I joined the police force because I was fortunate in life, retired super young, and was free to choose however I wanted to spend my time. However, I left for two reasons. First, those "normal" people constantly got released by the judges or lazy district attorneys. Or they would be given stupidly short sentences. Due to this, I'd always have to deal with bodies, including dead kids who got caught between domestic violence, despite my warnings to the judges. The second reason I left is because irrational "normal" people shot at me twice in the span of a month just for being a white officer (that's not an exaggeration, both shooters said that was the only reason, and so did another guy who tried to stab me.) When you're getting shot at, you don't exactly have time to describe to someone how awkward it would be if you were racist since you wake up next to your black wife every morning. Ironically, I still wanted to stay (hence why I'm still a volunteer), but my lovely African American wife was the one who demanded that I leave work since it was too dangerous. *So we are clear, I'm only pointing out her heritage to stress how dumb this type of behavior is and how otherwise rational people can truly believe in unjustified and immoral actions* So, in my personal experience, all humans can be evil or immoral, and I believe we should judge the actions rather than the intentions. We saw millions of ordinary German people follow Hitler's orders with complete understanding. I don't think morality is as simple as either of us makes it seem. This was an interesting conversation; thank you. :)
Not quite. We meet the Count during the first four chapters of the book when Jonathan Harker is imprisoned in Castle Dracula. Although it is true that the Count is absent for a long while after that.
there’s also the fear behind motivation. the previous inmates look out of their minds- they’re evil out of an inability to stop themselves. hannibal looks completely put together and in control- he’s evil because he Wants to be, he kills because he WANTS to. that’s a horrifying idea to confront.
Mads Mikkelsen's Hannibal portrayal is also so so good. Its one of my favorite shows. dont know why the show's cancelled, although being rated such high.
@@sophiecooper3624I don't get why some prefer Mads over Anthony thats like prefering a mid joker to Heath Ledger. Hopkins made Hannibal into winning a Oscar, Silence of the Lambs into a top25 ranked imdb movie of all time and also the highest ranked villain of all time by many organisations. Mads in those hannibal series barely got any recognition really
@@billrerikson6378Mads Mikkelsen played Hannibal in a series while Antony Hopkins in just a movie The series *wasn't* only focused on Hannibal that's why it's more preferable to some, there are different perspectives and points of view that's what I'm trying to say As for the comparison you mentioned in The Joker, Heath Ledger played in the Dark Knight if I'm remember correctly while Joaquin Phoenix had a movie focused only on the life of the Joker, the trauma, the difficulties in his life as well as how he became a psychopath To make a long story short It's not about who is better or worse it's about people's opinions... sometimes it's even the actors themselves that make a show worth watching ❤
MineTurtle Animations Keep in mind that stuff on screen doesn't translate quite so well onto paper. Shots and sound don't exist, only actions, dialogue, and descriptions.
I waited on Anthony Hopkins in Park City, Utah at a ski resort where I was working back in 2007. What a genius actor. I was starstruck but kept it to myself. I couldn't think of anything to say that he hadn't heard a thousand times, so I just was as normal as I could muster.
Ah yes. I love this topic. Thank you a lot for this video. Little suggestion maybe.... "How to do Dark Humour - American Psycho". Maybe? I've never seen anybody talk about American Psycho as a dark comedy which it obviously is in a big part. Keep up the great work. I love the fact that we get more video essayists lately.
I liked when she steps into the red light and looks at the picture that was handed to her. The man explains that Hannibal’s heart rate stayed even, unchanging as he bit the nurses tong off. Great way to set him up.
It's diliberate and has a desired psychological effect on Clarice, not a natural blink. Whe he finally decides to help Clarice, he's smart enough to know whats about to happen, he waits till shes in a vulnerable shocked state. He helps her, but remains in control. He's always several steps ahead psychologically speaking.
Expectation subversion isn't just important for horror, but all storytelling. Here, the villain actually appears normal for his reveal in stark contrast to what's expected. We also thought Vader killed Luke's dad and that John Doe wouldn't win in Se7en. Aang was supposed to kill the Fire Lord and Deadpool, at least for a moment, seemed to think about sparing Ajax. Subverting expectation makes for great comedy and drama because ultimately, every good story has a sense of mystery. The audience wants to be surprised.
Honestly, I think the scariest scene in almost all of film is the scene, (SPOILERS) Is when Buffalo Bill is looking at her in the dark and she has no idea what he is doing. He doesn’t do anything to her. He just looks.
Can we just take a second to enjoy the brilliance of Hopkins in his prime? The subtle expressions, even the breaking of eye contact with a blink then he looks at the floor and back to Clarice. Dude won an Oscar with only 24 minutes of screen time
Hey guys, so I’d just like to say sorry my voice sounds a little weird in this video. Essentially the reason why is I have been struggling with Tinnitus for the past 6 months. For those of you who dont know it is best described as a constant ringing that is in the victim’s ear that never goes away. Whenever you’ve been to a loud nightclub or a music festival you will probably experience a ringing in your ears that goes away within a few hours. What I have is that except the ringing is much louder and it never quiets down. It is constant. It may sound like it’s not that bad but really it is unbearable sometimes. I hear it all day every day and it is at the point now where it is making me depressed and is severely limiting my productivity. Nights are the worst. You never truly appreciate something until it is gone and something as simple as silence is something everyone takes for granted. The ability to go to bed or somewhere quiet and hear nothing is something that I have not had for half a year. The silence is deafening.
Right now I’m taking a course of drugs that are supposed to reduce the fluids in my ear as the doctor thinks that is the cause, the ringing is ever so slightly less noisy but still unbearable at times such as right now when I’m writing this. For those of you who dont know the ears, mouth and nose are all linked together so me taking these drugs to reduce fluids in my ears is also causing the way my nose works to shift so when I speak I sound slightly different. Not going to lie it feels pretty shit and I am 90% certain I will have this ringing and warbling in my ears for the rest of my life.
But anyway don't forget to like and subscribe XD
Feels bad bro, you are such a great person and I hate that this is happening to you
I hope you are going to be okay
I only hope the best for you and do what is necessary for you.
I can imagine how terrible it is, and since imagining is usually not as bad as the real thing, I can only expect what you're going through to be a 5x as worse as what I imagine XD
I'll pray that you'll find some sort of treatment that will help lessen your condition significantly, and make it a bit more tolerable to live with. Hold on there.
It didn't affect the video it was still a top-notch video.
“I’m having an old friend for dinner” is the most terrifying line I ever heard and I love it
Hannibal Lector? More like *Cannibal* Lector!
*wheeze*
Jesus is God thank you
@@aliciamata00
You're welcome my friend :)
@@jesusisgod2953 what was the point of this
@Dil Raja I mean I support too... but why in such a random place
He's standing straight and greets you like an Oblivion NPC
Your money or your life.. Hhhhh lol
M’aiq knows much, tells some. M’aiq knows many things others do not.
Sanguine, my brother!
*S T O P Y O U V I O L A T E D T H E L A W*
NINININININININI
"I do wish we could chat longer, but... i am having an old friend for a dinner."
Spongebob Edits ...kinda the point of the quote
@@mastershifu9252 literally what he means when he says that
That line sent chills down my spine.
“...Doctor Lecter? Doctor Lecter? Doctor Lecter...?”
*eats friend* mmmmm, dinner was tasty honey!
No matter how visibly insane and out of control a movie psychopath is shown, it will never be comparable to one who is completely composed and in control
How about both with the joker? I guess he blurs the line with sanity and insanity, but it seems he's always in control.
@@Ojas97 yea, and he is always able to act and plan out his schemes. you just furthered my point.
@@theblasteffect4499 Depends on the version of the joker, the joker from The Dark Knight is completely sane, but the joker from The Joker is insane because he is psychotic.
Like a Dennis Rader or John Wayne Gacy. The best of the worst hide behind the banality of normalcy 🤔
You call him a terrifying villain. I call him my next door neighbor. He is a very nice man. I just don't eat anything he cooks.
Me with every serial killer I hear of
@@zucchoni5170 what?
He is a very polite man. Just don't try to stand in the way of his freedom or go after some one he respects or cares about and all should be good.
Oh, also have an unhealthy diet.
That's the power of sir Anthony Hopkins
especially if its served with fava beans and a nice Chianti
I always loved that look Lecter gives after Clarice said "no, you ate them."
the look of... oh, yeah...
I thought there was a hint of pleasant recollection on his face. "...And they were delicious, Clarice."
@@neuralmute Free range rude.
@@jamegumb7298 Tastier than factory farmed.
I laughed when she said that, I thought it was savage.
I thought that was when he thought she was different than the others.
You neglected to mention what is to me THE most terrifying aspect of that first shot of Hannibal standing in the middle of his cell: the camera is showing Clarice's first-person perspective and as Hannibal comes into view he's already staring _right into it._ But he obviously doesn't just spend all day standing still in the middle of his cell. He knew she was coming. He was _waiting for her._
Well he wasn't waiting too long lol he just heard that dude hiss at her
I'm thinking Lector had already struck a deal to help with the investigation, and thusly knew someone was coming to see him.
Wise up... if you watched this in the cinema you expected the glass to break🤣🤣
And in the movie, the guards said they put a chair out for her so I think he would know that someone would be coming there to sit in that chair.
Well in Red Dragon they tell him he has a visitor at the end of the movie, so...
Anthony Hopkin's girlfriend saw the movie when it came out and she was so terrified of his face she dumped him almost overnight... Plus, when the movie had its premier Hopkins would creep up to people's seats and say in a sudden, calm voice "how are you liking the film?" and scare everyone senseless. This guy is fricken awesome. great vid btw
I hope this isn't true because that's such a shitty reason to dump someone
Women
@@joffles6516How’s the boyfriend?
@@joffles6516I know men who have broken up with people for stupid reasons 2 soooo
@@bethgoode1227 I have 73 examples of it just from watching *SEINFELD.* 😅🤣😆😅
The detail I liked about this scene is how Chilton warned her not to approach the glass, yet Lecter immediately tests her by requesting to see the badge up close. She complies, but not out of subservience. She is playing by her own rules, not Chilton’s. Hannibal respects this, as she treats him like a person and not some demonic entity.
i agree! i think thats why he refused to talk to them
Chilton is, by far, hannibals inferior.
What did you like or dislike about the film?
How to Terrify the Audience:
Step 1: Hire Anthony Hopkins
Step 2: Marvel at the talent.
hahaa
Hes actually atustic
@@softnoobgirl73 so? That doesn’t mean he can’t be a good actor
@@softnoobgirl73 and you're dyslexic doesn't mean you have to be rude.
All the guy said was that he was autistic nothing else why are you guys so up his ass?
Another way to look at things is the way the shots on hannibal's face kind of invade our personal space making us uncomfortable. And even more uncomfortable, his face looks calm... too calm.
ha. I bet you forgot you commented this. Hello Antoine how’s life been since you commented this comment?
dayley fletcher I- that’s a lil creepy gsodhdk
Sana Sakamaki It’s OK I’m not an old creepy man I just thought it would be funny to comment that lol
@@mangotango2404 I bet you also forgot you commented this. hello Mango how's life been since you replied to Antoine's comment?
He invades our mental space that really terrifies .
Hannibal is like all the three inmates in one body, he’s creepy but civilized, he has no real empathy and feels no guilt, but he also has an animal side to him since he eats people, now that I think about it these traits go hand in hand throughout the movie. At first he’s cunning but terrifying like the man in the first cell, then you see his lack of empathy when told about the killer, and then you see the terrifying animal part of him when he escapes. It’s like he has these traits are balled up inside of him waiting to come out for the kill.
He is a psycianalpath
Excellent observation 👌🏻
I would argue that Hannibal has tons of empathy. He knows exactly what people around him are feeling and he uses that knowledge to manipulate them. What he doesn't have is compassion. He knows what you're feeling but doesn't care about you other than how you might be useful to him.
He's just standing there...
MENACINGLY
WEEE WOOO WEEE WOOO
@Tsukasa's Face When Stealing A Belt that was not a jojo reference
@Tsukasa's Face When Stealing A Belt *hit my jojo*
Tsukasa's Face When Stealing A Belt it’s a spongebob reference not a jojo reference
AYAYAYAAAAA
Hopkins said in an interview once that he had coffee with a madman in London who he never saw blink during their lengthy conversation, so he made sure that he didnt blink whilst playing lecter.
Did he do research by meeting with psychopaths? And I also love your profile pic, I thought u were some senator at first haha
He blinked.
He winked while I was reading this
and that's how clever Hopkins is , he learns constantly , absorbing like a sponge knowledge from any possible source , that is his real talent and the next talent is that he can reproduce it with his own charesmatic way !!!!
@spud potato that fact exactly shows how talented both are... To my opinion there is a category " the most expressive eyes" in which belong the following actors :
Anthony Hopking, Jack Nicholson, Mel Gibson, Ray Liotta, Robert Downey Jr, Omar Shariff, Al Pacino... From all the above the most diverse and charismatic is mister Hopking.
He can be a benevolent professor, a priest, a serial killer, a prisoner...
He actually terrified the actress (Jodie Foster) so much that in interviews Jodie says she never spoke to him off-set ! ! !
I find it funny how Anthony Hopkins also avoided Foster because SHE intimidated him when he’s playing the psychopath.
Until the final day - Jodie discusses this on the Graham Norton Show (with Russell Crowe and Ryan Gosling).
Until he cooks you
@@jacklemm1518 I think that actually had more to do with her fame than being intimidating, actors get star struck as much as we do.
@@kanivalos2712 For brains and liver, yes. But it seems human tartare is the choice du jour for Hannibal Lector for impromptu ala carte dining.
Something that adds to the affect is when Clarice first meets Hannibal, his eyes are in the shadows. The rest of him is bright and normal but you can’t see the eyes. It’s a “I might look normal but I have a terrible secret” feel.
BROO I THOUGHT THAT TOO 😭
Yea there was the sense that "something's not right". Everything points to him being a psychopath yet in that moment, it challenges the audience to compare what they've been told with reality, but now that doesn't tell you everything either. Even seeing Hannibal Lecture, up and down, it's in the eyes.
Eyes are so compelling.
how to terrify the audience
TH-cam: **Double Ads**
*When it starts Buffering*
☠️
AAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!
double ads that you can't skip
@@dishachakraborty2184 that's just cruelty
One part I love about the cinematography is how she looks like she is behind the glass, but when Hannibal is in the frame it looks like he is not. Shows how she is the one who is trapped or powerless. Great vid :)
wow! a great detail
Interesting observation
But she aint still powerless. He is in cage and cant get out, so he has no power in my opinion, when if she does not get from him the answers she came looking for. She can move on with her life, when it seems he just didnt want to answer.
@@jout738 but the point is that she needs him, she needs his help. She can't just move on, she wants to solve the case. And even behind the glass he controls her
@@mizukiwatanabe3493 yeah...some dudes just... don't get it, man. (Or hey-maybe he's like 14. Either way.)
Hollywood back then: Who needs jumpscares when we can have terrifying Villains and good writing?
Hollywood now: “who needs good writing and terrifying villains when we can have jumpscares?
I hate jump scares, seeing as they make me violent. But I love the psychological horror that keeps me at the edge of my seat without having me thrash about
true
@@thelatterdayarbiter same
@@thelatterdayarbiter oh my god sooo pathetic
@@thelatterdayarbiter This is a natural body response to a fight or flight surprise. Most people are cowardly and would run/be terrified and too afraid to act, so atleast you know your not a coward like most people.
The emphasis on "closer" even as a child I knew what he was trying to do and it absolutely thrilled me. Hopkins makes you feel like he's crawling under your skin with one word.
"Jump scares... lots and lots of jump scares."
*All of Hollywood:* "Ok, sure!"
"Okay I believe you"
British accents.
jump scares aren't bad y'know
When done right it can frighten the audience
OnePieceLover1175 that's a really great quote
@There can be Only One Potato The only reason they are ridiculed is because they are overused. Abuse ensues parody
Something that the video doesn't mention is that while yes, when you first see hannibal lecter standing there in his cell, he's not showing any signs of insanity, to me he is terrifying anyway because he seems so... artificial. Yes he's not showing any signs of insanity but he's not normal because a normal person would just looking bored, lying on the bed, maybe reading...? However, he's just standing in the middle of his cell, unmoving, with a perfect posture. Its almost like he's TRYING to appear normal but just comes off creepy because its not actually normal in the slightest. However, he's a psychologist so it has to be intentional. The best way I can describe it is that it is like he knew she was coming and decided to do the creepiest thing he could think of, which was in fact, nothing, like an absence of any sort of traits so she couldn't read him. And that is terrifying because you have NO idea what to expect.
To me it looked too predictable. He heard her coming and therefore took that position to assert dominance. The reason he 'appears' terrifying is the incompetence of the FBI Agent who should be trained in interrogations and the fact that while she clearly was incompetent had no one with knowledge with her
Totally agree with this analysis. It's like he's attempting to look and act like a "normal agreeable" person which comes off really forced and artificial.
Everything he is showing is just what he wants you to see, everything in his cell is in his control and the way he wants it to look to give the impression he is intelligent and artistic, which demands respect, controls potential conversation topics and ultimately disguises and distracts from who he really is, an insane murderer who eats people.
@@cattysplat Yes! and that is why he is humiliated when she gives him that questionnaire, or when she throws the cannibalism straight to his face. Hannibal does not like to be referred to as ON OF THOSE CANNIBALISTIC SICK BASTARDS out there. He is unique, he is the best, he is Dracula among the vampires who obviously never accept anyone referring to him as to some stupid gig from Blade.
He's standing because he knew she was coming and it would be rude to greet his guests, especially a woman, sitting down. At least this is what Anthony Hopkins says of why Hannibal is standing when Starling comes to visit him.
@@cattysplat He doesn't have to "give the impression he is intelligent and artistic". He IS intelligent and artistic as well as an insane murderer who eats people, and since he is captured, everyone knows these things about him so he doesn't have to pretend to be one thing and not the other. He was standing because in his opinion, it's rude to greet guests while sitting.
The most terrifying thing about this is the loss of the iconic line "Hello, Clarice" from the scene.
Marik 444 oo we delving into some meta shit here
Marik 444 that shit still blowing my mind
Good evening clarice
True
Mandela effect!
For me, he's terrifying for two main reasons;
1. He has no motivation, he kills because he is simply able to do so.
2. He is looked in that place just because he wants to. We clearly see he has massive manipulation skills, how come he didn't leave yet.
bro what
Lecter kills because he is a social critic.
He kills people for being:
A. Rude
B. Incompetent.
C. Stupid.
He sees himself as cleaning up society, one meal at a time. But why eat them?
Because to let them go to waste would be rude.
clearly not. He escaped at the first opportunity
Actually, depending on the novel you read, Hannibal _does_ have a motivation.
TW: trauma and graphic depictions of violence
Second TW ⚠️
In Hannibal Rising, Hannibal and his sister Mischa were captured as children in Lithuania and taken by a group led by a war criminal. Hannibal witnesses his sister being murdered and cannibalized, and eventually discovers that he ate a part of her as well.
This helps set up the pathology of why Hannibal eats people and his attempt to turn these things into some expression of ‘art’; to put things back into the world ‘better’ than he found them or to correct the blot that people like his captors put on it. He actually spends his time hunting the individual members down in the early pages of the book and learns combat from a woman named Murasaki.
No such thing as no motivation. Someone with no motivation just wont do anything.
The intimacy of the eye contact is unnerving. The ultra-closeups, and how both actors portray it. Jodie foster doesn't get enough credit for her acting in this scene. It's terrifying, you can feel it, but because she's standing across from Anthony Hopkin's Hannibal Lechter, it's overshadowed. More sublimation here, he steals the scene, but as you pointed out "Closer..." is asserting dominance, it also tightens the vignette. Focusing on the eye contact, the intimacy, and claustrophobia of the situation. Ironically, she's trapped, while he's standing calmly in his cell. He's comfortable, well lit, with decorated walls, while all she's got is a folding chair in a dim cramped corridor...
Well said...
Olivia Rose r u serious? How does it scare you then if you haven’t even seen it
She was praised for her acting in this movie, everything thinks it's about Hannibal but he only has less than 15 min of screen time.
When he's on he steals the show but she is great enough where your not just waiting for Hopkins to get back.
Another comment meant to misinform people. Jodie Foster won a fucking Oscar for her performance in this movie so please stop spreading this false idea that she doesnt get enough credit, that is literally the highest credit any actor can ever receive for their work.
Yep. What got me is that he was saying 'closer, closer' allegedly so that he could read her ID, but all the time she was stepping forward he was looking at her eyes, not the ID. And then he casually flicks his eyes down to the ID, reads it super-fast, back to her with, "Yeah, you're not worthy."
Their relationship is so intriguing. He doesn’t just give her information. He knows she can grow to become a better investigator and challenges her to do exactly that. Without him, she probably wouldn’t have gotten to where she wanted to be.
When he brings up something from Clarice’s past, it’s for a reason. He doesn’t just do it to open old wounds. It’s give and take. He may be evil, but he’s not crude. You don’t find many villains with that much complexity these days.
Well Clarice actually falls in love with Dr. Lecter and he was in love with her on sight. The movie adaptations refused to stay true to the books wherein after Clarice saves Hannibal from Mason Verger and he saves her from the pigs she offers herself to him and they go and live in Cuba for the remaining years of their lives. So be like the Joker got into Dr. Harley Quinn's mind and heart, Hanny got into Clarice head and heart.
Raymond Reddington lol
You think its good in silence of the lambs that is poetrayed to a higher level in red dragon
@@michaeltruthson6262 Yes, that's why I don't like the novel. Silence of the lambs is pretty good, but Hannibal was absolute garbage in my opinion.
@@skullsaintdead help cops brutally assault people.
Hannibal Lecter by Anthony Hopkins is one of the best characters in a movie of all time.
Michael Gogo i was gonna say that..
@@zarathustrafoundation a broken man exposing a broken society
Roderick Zijlstra Joker. Joaquin Phoenix. Heath Ledger.
I like both lecter and jack Torrance
@Graphene Pyromaniac everyone who plays joker their best
It's all on the eyes. Always in the eyes.
Sir Anthony's acting with his eyes is what tells the audience that this guy is THAT ONE. 😳
Superb. 👌🏽✨️
i definitely agree that using helpless protagonists makes it very terrifying, but in some ways I find the opposite to be true: what's more horrifying than seeing someone do everything right, everything you thought would work and keep them safe, only for it to fail in the end. they're helpless in that sense, and you'll feel the same way too. 👀👀
Sepia Smith exactly how i feel about Infinity War
You should watch _The Mist_ (2007) if you haven't seen it yet.
Great observation! This technique was used in Hereditary and it worked marvelously.
Think of the episode from doctor who: Midnight.
Sepia Smith This actually happens to the Memphis police in Silence of the Lambs, you'll notice, when Lector escapes. They make no stupid mistakes as is common in these films but they still fail.
"Lecter is our most prized asset" is actually the best line to describe him because it is the most dehumanizing line. It gives no indication that he is a person. Instead of saying "he" the doctor says "Lecter". Then, instead of saying "prisoner" he says "asset". These two words dont necessarily make what he is talkibg about a person which is why its the best.
Agreed. I am glad someone pointed it out.
It also serves to display the seedy, self-promoter that Dr. Chilton is. His charges are an opportunity for fame and notoriety. Clarice recognizes it right away and placates him.
As soon as he said "he is our most prized asset" I thought "ah HELL nah, he's gonna wanna team up with him." (I've never seen the movie before.)
@@sassylittleprophet Chilton is arguably more of an antagonist in the movie than Hannibal lecter is
It's also a great and subtle way to show how Chilton is just the worst AND it exposes the ableism he has. Even though Hannibal IS scary as hell and awful, he's still a human being and Chilton speaks of him as if his mental illness makes him an object.
"The reason Hannibal is such a terrifying villain is because he has all the power"
(Emperor Palpatine) wants:
To know your location
Vergil wants yoyr location
bro were done w the iridescence era change your pfp lol
Hannibal might have the power, but Emperor Palpatine has *UNLIMITED POWAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!*
@Tyler Gay power is power
''IIII HAVEEEE THE POOWWEEEEEEEEER!!!''
Guess that one ^^
Hannibal seems like such as gentleman. That is one of the things that makes him so scary.
There's a huge difference between horror and terror.
What is the difference
ThErE Is A HuGe DIFFErENCe bETWeEn sAd aND UNhaPpY
wft do u mean
Don't worry 'bout a thing
Horror - an intense feeling of fear, shock, or disgust.
Terror - extreme fear.
There is nothing different really. I guess terror is just to terrify...and horror has other emotions rather than just to terrify.
Don't worry 'bout a thing Horror: Anxiety that spawned from your grasp of reality per se.
Terror: Trauma that spawned from what other people did to you or can do to you.
The difference may be subtle, but some of us unlearned to sleep from it.
Edit: Sorry! I think that was sassy. I do not want to be sassy, I'd just like to get some more sleep. And I can be a real prick when sleep-deprived.
One of the earliest "frighteners" in movies, Boris Karloff - in reality a charming, cultured Englishman named William Henry Pratt - disliked hearing his movies described as "horror films".
" Horror suggests revulsion, " he said. "I like to think of the movies as 'terror films' - my job is to frighten people, not disgust them."
That's the difference.
“You are what you eat” said the blue fairy, unknowingly.
Pinnochio turned sly eyes upon the elementary school.
thats so dark i love it
Do i look like a real boy now papa?
Hold the f up-
Lol
Yo wtf
Watched this film for the first time yesterday, at my local cinema.
How did I even miss this gem?
Wow. 😮
Lost count the amount of times I've seen it.
Did you look at people a little different after the film? Did you check the locks and alarms before going to bed a little more cognitively?
I have it on DVD and haven't watched it for ages. I'll probably watch again this before the end of this week.
cinema?
4:00 it's called tasking. You ask someone to do something and if they do, then you have established a power hierarchy. Could be as simple as asking for a light (common when people smoked), a glass of water, even asking the time. It can be refused, eg by handing the other party the matches (No, light your own.) But Clarice didn't refuse and so gave power to Lecter. She could have approached the cell right away, shown the ID and withdrawn. She might even have asked 'Mind if I sit?' knowing he had no choice but to accede. That way she would have retained the balance of power. (He's basically a caged animal, she has all the aces ) Lecter, of course, would have understood what she was doing and could have upped the ante. However by playing this hand as she did, Clarice handed power to Lecter, which he was too much of a gentleman to exploit. She called out his protective instinct, in other words and throughout their relationship, Clarice maintains power over Lecter in repeated, similar power plays. He realises early on that he's met his match, which is why he never harms her, indeed becomes her protector.
Will Graham is his match. He loves Clarice that's why 😒
An interesting thing related to this is also that in the book Red Dragon Hannibal does the same to Will Graham, asking him if he wants to sit down, but Will doesn't.
Let's not act like the writer or director made this character, without Anthony Hopkins we wouldn't be making this video.
Brian Cox was just as good
Can you imagine Nick Cage doing it?
@@count7340 Why not? He would be great I think in that role
That's a pretty bad way of looking at it. It's a chicken and egg situation. Certainly without Thomas Harris this video wouldn't be made either. It takes two to tango.
The constant Hollywood-esque reinforcement of actors are everything and writers are redundant is nauseating
@@phiavir5594 Exactly, even if you have the best actor in the world playing a terribly written character, the character won't be good. You need both
Clarice's muscle twitching on neck and peripheral areas of her face show she's extremely nervous... before she even meets Hannibal. The emotional communication Hopkins and Foster convey is magnificent.
The reason why your viewer retention rate is so high is because you’re smart and concise and explain topics that us as the audience actually care about. We get educated in a 10-20 minute video very successfully. Thank you.
I ate his liver with some fava beans and nice chianti...
*LICKLICKLICKLICKLICK*
Why
Rero ^^
@@neyte7313 rerorerorerorerorerorerorerorerorerorerorero
Lol
Pero pero pero pero pero pero
‘I didn’t’
‘You’re right. You ate yours.’
His brain- Well crap
True. I love that part.
Walked himself into that one, tried to show off and got brought down a peg by Starling.
Similar effect in the exchange in "Red Dragon" between Lecter and Graham:
Will Graham : No, I know I'm not smarter than you.
Hannibal Lecter : Then how did you catch me?
Will Graham : You had... disadvantages.
Hannibal Lecter : What disadvantages?
Will Graham : You're insane.
The real reason he is terrifying to put it simply... he has fully accepted and understands himself in a way most other humans can never achieve. He knows himself best.
How knowing yourself is the same as being a monster?
Thing about Lecter is he is creepy as hell yet charming all the same. He’s the villain but you cheer for him and want him to win you know you’ve done something right when you make a character like this, it’s an excellent psychotic victory
Dr. Lecter is a contradiction who is both a doctor, psychologist who is a delusion of himself as a maniac murderer.
That’s because we subconsciously compare him to Crawford. Lector respects Clarice and acts more like a mentor to her. He’s demented yes. But he’s brilliant and he’s straight with her.
He quid pro quos with her but gives her a choice about it. He’s up front. Meanwhile Crawford is using her left and right however and whenever it suits him best in the moment. He does that thing at the funeral home where he aligns himself with the small town police and makes her the outcast little lady that it’s not decent to talk in front of. The ends justify the means with Crawford.
By contrast, Lector invests in her and it’s even more evident in the book that he sees her potential and works with her to deepen her understanding of abnormal psychology. Goes much further in the book with that dynamic. He actually helps her to move toward her goal.
When Hannibal finds out about the “deal” for his help being a lie, I remember feeling sorry for him! That’s one hell of a trick to pull off as an author and whoever wrote the adaptation nailed it too.
Yeah I’m still trying to look under the hood of this story to figure out how Lector was made to be such a sympathetic villain- even after he has killed people on screen. Some of it probably has to do with the excellent casting of Anthony Hopkins - but not all of it.
@@eyeseer1is it?
@@nikkinewbie6014what you say holds more water than the hover dam
@@nikkinewbie6014I enjoy your analysis of him
Silence of the Lamb Alternate ending:
Clarice 'will you help me'
Hannibal 'No'
Directed by Robert E Weide
In summary: Pay attention to details
nowadays mfs have the attention span of a fly
@@userjoinedyourchannel1 it's sad hey
Leave the obvious vague
"I'm having an old friend for dinner" is one of the truly great closing lines in cinematic history. And I ought to know because I have watched over a dozen movies in my lifetime.
cjpreach You’ve only seen 12 movies?
@@oliviail At least. Maybe more. Hehehe
Wow, that's a lot. I lost count at ten on account of that's how many fingers I gots
I think I might have seen at least 100 movies, if not more. I also watched at least 10 or more shows.
Actually, multiple hundreds.
What I loved about their interaction is while she does not have to fear him physically attacking her that like a room full of radioactivity the longer she stays the more at risk she is. It can be summed up with one line in the film.
"Believe me, you don't want Hannibal Lecter inside your head."
This is a man who knows how to worm his way into a persons head and find all their soft spots. Then knowing them he could easily use them to harm people for his pleasure. He does this with Clarice with having her recount her worst memories but the real danger is that the longer he is around you the more susceptible to his will.
This can be shown by Miggs. Lecter was able to convince him to swallow his own tongue just by talking to him. Once Lecter knows you he can use what he knows to break you down completely.
That line of dialog might be the most important sentence in the film. It establishes the tension we feel for every second that Clarice spends in Lecter's presence, the fear that we have every time she's forced to give him a piece of her past as quid pro quo.
beautiful...
It seems obvious to me that you're getting better than average viewer retention times because you're putting together intelligent content. Your observations and conclusions make sense. Your delivery is well paced, and clear. Kudos!
Thanks :)
he’s charming asf, but at the same time he’s absolutely terrifying
Why am I watching this when I need to go to sleep?!
Same bro
wtf same bro same
Yep
Because this popped up in ur recommended and u wanted to know the secret of Hannibal Lecter xD
Same here lo
Anthony Hopkins is such a brilliant actor, I got chills from the amazing acting
He is so insane, he is sane in his own right.
Oh, I feel the scariest thing of _ALL_ is that "impenetrable" plastic you talk about. For me, after the straight-up _medieval_ iron bars containing the other hopelessly insane criminals, there seems to be _nothing at all_ between Hannibal and Clarice (i.e. _us-the audience.)_ There isn't a lot of light reflecting on the material-I wouldn't be surprised if there was nothing at all really there while filming it.
the actress said in an interview i believe that they did these scenes separately, never talking face to face.
Yes indeed
Personally, I don't find Hannibal "terrifying" at all, because he's caged. But it is like looking at a caged predator - you know it's harmless in a cage, but could tear you apart, were it to get out. Same is here - Hannibal looks at protagonist like a predator looks at it's prey. I don't agree with the video - he doesn't look normal. He looks like he's trying to look "civil", normal, but you can clearly see he's deranged. But basically all of this is a credit to the actor.
I mean every now and then they show the air holes
@@Gyvulys it's funny, I watched the silence of the lambs and thought "he's not believable at all, who would buy him as a normal person?" And then I watched Red Dragon and realised he was different before he got caught. Believable, as a kindly old man. so I'd say he kinda relaxed after being caught, allowing himself to be a bit wild because it kept people afraid of him. However irl, historically, serial killers don't really change their behaviour in prison. even if they admit to their crimes their ego won't allow them to take down the facade, ever. They just carry on with the charismatic act (Ted Bundy is a good example) unless they lose their mind like Manson
How to terrify an audience in 2020:
sneeze
I use to cough to hide a fart, since 2020 I fart to hide a cough
@@reineh3477 That is frickin' hilarious!
@@reineh3477 genius
@@reineh3477 so true
@@reineh3477 😳
When I first seen him behind the bars I thought I was the one behind the bars and I felt like I was at his mercy. The hunger was oozing out of him it was palpable I was terrified as a teen. Hopkins didn't have much screen time but I was impressed immensely
The look on Hannibal's face makes it seem as if I am looking right in the devil's eyes. It's so terrifying. He is the best actor for that role.
"Does he bite?"
-Yes, but he can also hurt you in other ways
Really fucking true, when considering how psychologically vicious he can get... remember the senator???
@@Daelyah he didn't eat miggs. He psychologically tortured him into swallowing his own tongue
“The reason why Hannibal Lecter is so terrifying is that he has all the of the power.”
*'Literally every historical ruler' wants to know your location*
Michaela Kang *Phoenix King Ozai wants to know your location.*
@@TragicTortellini wat about aang?
I'm not a horror fan, but this suspense movie had a profound effect that left me astonished as I left the cinema. I was disturbed and confused why I felt admiration for Lector.
I have no desire to harm others, let-alone taste their flesh, but I concluded, it was his towering intellect, education, and sophistication. All an exterior mask, hiding a cold, calculating, coiled power underneath, with a keen focus holding it back until just the right moment, and then unleashing the demon within.
It made him both terrifying and disarming. An amazing portrayal by Anthony Hopkins.
he just stood their like 🧍♂️
HAHAHJSJN
HAHAHJSJN
HAHAHJSJN
HASAJSJAJAHSA the're *
@@eisanotatsujin there*
old hollywood: no! you can’t just expect to scare the audience with bad writing and a faceless villain!
new hollywood: haha jump scares go brrr
@v4lue its a joke lol
this is very ignorant to say
@@nobody2021 what
@@nobody2021 i like modern horror it’s literally a joke 💀
@@bodebaggins look dude, there a lot of crappy old horror movies. most movies in the genre in general are not good. besides there are modern movies i can point to as well as being really good as an example of current horror movies being high quality compared to other eras. it's so easy to build a strawman saying a past era was better than the current era when you compare the best of the past to the worst of the present.
let the right one in, hereditary, lake mungo, the lighthouse, under the skin, the clovehitch killer, all really good modern horror movies that don't rely on jumpscares. if you can't find any modern horror movies that are good then you're not looking hard enough.
"He is not just bad, he is nos just insane, he is an absolute MAD LAD"
This scene in particular was just an absolute powerhouse of casting, directing, cinematography, acting... Just a beautiful representation of why I love seeing scenes broken down like this. Great job on explaining everything.
1991: "Do you hear the lambs now, Clarice?"
2015: "This is all I ever wanted for you, Will."
Ah yes, A fellow man of culture
idk.. the Last Hannibal isn't as scary as The original Hannibal Lecter..
@@Eliza.x he fuckin is and he's played nearly just as well
@@romanxxxxyoutube chill I just stated my opinion
@@Eliza.x Hold on how tf am I not chill?
This guy and heath ledgers joker have to be 2 of the greatest villians ever created, and both have a deep understanding of the human psyche.
Arthur Morgan and ezio auditore beats both in writing and character development
@@ghostofdeath663 they are not villain
Walter white and johan liebert
Griffith, johan Liebert, funny valentine are better imo
Yes I’m a manga fan
anton chigurh tho
so I have this English exam coming up..
How'd it go?
@@zen.7843 probably pretty bad
this is english
Cool. Mine is Math... Tomorrow... Just don't ask why I'm here... I don't know either.
well..your comment had no seeming contextual reference to the video, yet you managed to get 300+ likes and even a few comments ...well, my friend, who are you?
What makes Lector so terryfing to me is the fact that he is very intelligent. There is nothing more dangerous than an insane person with a high level of intelligence since you can't predict what he is going to do and in the worst case, he might totally read you
Had the same thought. It's hard to shake the thought that he knows more than you do. In combination with a sociopathic lack of empathy, one fears not only that he'll figure out how to do what he wants but that he'll have no reservations about doing it, whatever it is...
My psychology teacher was particularly fond of this character.
Who wouldn't be? Hannibal is an amazing character.
It’s even better when you can theorize about his backstory and psychopathy as a psych expert
You wanna scare the audience?
Cast anthony hoppkins and tell him to be a villain . Thats all there ia to it
He was even pretty intimidating in Westworld and he was like kind of a villain in that kind of not?
See, Hannibal Lector is a Genius, he is manipulative and can Trick anybody, when Hannibal tells Clarice to bring the ID Closer, she obeys, this already proves, he gives commands, *others listen.*
You just proved he was a genius because he knew who he was before even the police did
Well, he actually persuade the inmate next to him to commit suicide
Doesn't the YTer say that
I saw this movie as a teenage boy and I left terrified because I knew that people like this exist. Hannibalhad all the power in this movie and I was quite obvious even though it was behind bars. He was a genius psychiatrist who knew how to manipulate people
Why do you capitalize every other word
Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins never interacted between scenes. She only really saw him when he was locked in his cell on set. Made these interactions super real. Incredible performances from both actors.
im gonna be totally honest, Mads Mikkelsen (sorry if i spelled that wrong) is a spectacular Hannibal, and oftentimes makes me forget just how terrifying Hannibal actually is from time to time
Such a great series, hopefully Netflix does something more with it bc it was supposed to be 6 seasons originally
That slicked back hair that makes us focus entirely on his face. And the way that smile/smirk plays under the piercing eyes.
Terrifying.
While I don't fully disagree with your statement "if you want your audience to feel terrified, it has all to do with which character has the power" I think it only tells half of the story. It may sound like nitpicking but I'd say it's just as important, if not more important, to emphasize where the LACK of power is if you really want to terrify your audience. I hadn't ever really thought much about the idea of terror until you made that statement, but once I heard it I realized that terror is feeling an overwhelming sense of powerlessness in the face of a malicious presence. If you want your audience to feel terror then you want your audience to be focused on the terrorized's powerlessness more-so than you want them to be focused on the terrorizer's power.
Either way though, I think this was a great video and it really got me thinking, keep up the great work!
One other thing is that in that scene often times it is shot in a way that makes it appear as if there is no glass between them and he is just standing right in front of her.
HOLY CRAP HE UPLOADED
Surprise ;D
What did you have to edit in this comment
slender cream holy😂😂😂
H
I’m an honest man, and there’s only one movie that has ever scared me....
The emoji movie
You and me both brother. You and me both 😔
Shrek also scarred me
Hoe op aarde 🤣
@@rianaschreuder7841 😂
Almal like van n boere pompie...
The cinematography amazingly captured the terror.
So much just in their scenes, the perspective, the dialogue, their mannerisms all to convey such a brilliant scene in cinema history that truly makes one fear without no blood or jump scare, not even music or screaming
I can’t believe they copied Icarly like that smh
I thought it was Sam and cat
@Austin Nguyen that line genuinely scared me as a small child
A villian like hannibal is actually possible that's the most scary part..
Yes it is !!! We can find even worst psycopaths than him in politics and as CEOs in big economic groups. Their major skill is their natural hability to manipulate others and they have a total lack of empathy to other people. They are not crazy. They are evil.
@@siegfriedkleinmartins7816 I’d argue that being born with ASPD doesn’t necessarily make someone evil. Even though “evil” and morality are subjective, a person’s actions will speak for them better than anything. (I totally agree with what you’re saying, generally. I’m just writing some notes on the actual “psychopath” condition that readers might find interesting)
There are some fascinating and very well written psychology papers on this. Unfortunately, legitimate information is hard to find because this is an extremely sensationalized, and poorly researched disorder. It has a weird status where it’s seemingly acceptable to make fun of it, and make money off of people affected by it. Even though life can be unbearable for some of the people effected, and an overwhelming majority don’t ever do anything wrong.
It’s just an “uncanny valley” effect for most people, because a normal person can kill 5 people and no one cares, but someone with ASPD killing a single person would get more TH-cam videos, because they didn’t show an emotional response and it’s uncomfortable or creepy for most people (though, again, it’s not like someone chooses to have ASPD, just like no one chooses to develop schizophrenia or bipolar disorder).
Again, statistically, most people with ASPD function normally in society and don’t cause trouble. But sometimes they go far out of the way to be helpful or even self-sacrificial because they understand cognitively that it’s the way most humans should behave. Reading the stats, you might be surprised to find that people with ASPD who avoid crime early in life (statistically highly probable if they are raised in the middle class or higher) tend to hold the most prestigious jobs like doctors, scientists, lawyers, judges, and more. Jobs that require a great deal of effort to achieve, and the ability to separate emotional bias. This can have some pretty cool effects.
Just a quick example, almost all U.S navy seals are diagnosable as having ASPD. I think the statistic is somewhere between the 85-90%. Doctor Martha Stout (Harvard medical) and Professor Kevin Dutton (Cambridge/Oxford) both wrote well received studies on this. (Fun fact, Dutton was also in contact with the creators of Dexter, and Michael C. Hall read some of his research to understand the role better).
But the Seals thing makes sense pretty intuitively if you think about it. A lot of the hardest Seal tests involve ignoring fear response, and additional emotional responses someone with a “typical” amygdala would have. It’s important to be able to remain emotionally distant for a bit in a gunfight, because if your friend gets shot, a “normal” person would probably lose focus on the mission and increase the chances of losing the whole team. Being much more resilient against trauma helps stave off PTSD, which, again, is important for Seals because they are constantly involved in close quarters search and destroy missions. This is a very different arrangement than most soldiers.
Hope someone found this interesting.
@@juderocks5 in one thing I have to disagree with you: morality canot be relativised, good actions differ strongly of bad intentioned actions. ASPD is not what I was talking about. Real psychopats, or sociopats know exactly what they are doing, and take pleasure of it, as two kids in England, few years ago, of 9 and 6 years old, that kidnaped a baby of few months and put him on the railroad tracks, just to see him being killed by the train. At their age they knew exactly what could happened.
Both were condemned to life sentence.
Recently a group of 4 young murderers were condemned to life sentences because all the 4 raped and killed a young girl, after killing her boyfriend. At the court they were laughing, while their sentence was read. Now they have free food and shelter, provided by tax payers.
This happened in the USA
About navy seals, is well known that the military select, with the hard training and bullying, the recruits with killer instinct, and dispose of the ones that don't have.
They want obedient soldiers, not people that could question orders, if they have to explode a terrorrist shelter full of innocent people used as shield.
@@siegfriedkleinmartins7816 *I'm so sorry this is long; I didn't realize until I was done*
I don't think we really disagree too much, if I'm honest. (though I do have to correct the psychopath/ sociopath/ ASPD thing. I tried to be simple about it. It's all ASPD. There is no difference; we can even test for it with FMRI, watch the hot spots, and track neuronal activity. There hasn't been much debate in that area in the last 20 years or so, and it was collectively solidified with the last DSM publication). People with ASPD know what they are doing. It's not related to insanity, just a distinct range of emotional responsivity disparate to "typical" humans.
Back on topic: I don't REALLY disagree with your morality statement, and here is my point of view. Relative morality is a bit of a philosophical conundrum. It's not something that we are likely ever to understand due to the unsurprisingly subjective nature of one of the most subjective topics. Some people like Sam Harris "relativize" morality by expressing it as a function directly correlated to the well-being of humans. That's a pretty good argument, and I took a Harvard Bioethics course that went pretty in-depth about that concept. But even though that point of view leans in my direction, I'm still on the fence about it because of its very nature, and I doubt there could ever be a clinical definition.
As for the criminals you listed, I strongly agree with you about the moral argument in those situations. But this happens to be one instance where I have more experience than most. I was a police officer for six years, and I still work on the reserve force/SWAT as a volunteer. I've seen plenty of disgusting humans. Some were insane (diagnosably insane, like had schizophrenia or brain damage), some were high/drunk, some were probably diagnosable with ASPD, and some were "normal" humans who just did something stupid. But the worst, most disturbing crimes were frequently committed by "normal" people with anger problems.
Here is my argument, and you can feel free to disagree, but I don't think we're far apart. All humans are capable of monstrous acts, regardless of diagnosis. When I said normal people with anger issues committed the "worst" crimes, what I meant was that I always had to deal with those people. It seemed like once a month, I'd see the same person involved in a drive-by shooting, a gang fight, or a revenge attack (usually over something stupid like a Facebook post). They didn't have a disorder, weren't sorry, and knew what they were doing. Instead of waiting for a lawyer, they almost always started talking before I even asked them anything and usually tried to justify or rationalize whatever they did. I've seriously had people say things like, "Look, that B*** had it coming. I told her if she didn't bring me my phone back, I was gonna set her house on fire."
And they were totally serious! They truly believed they were justified somehow. I dealt with people like that practically every night at work.
I joined the police force because I was fortunate in life, retired super young, and was free to choose however I wanted to spend my time. However, I left for two reasons. First, those "normal" people constantly got released by the judges or lazy district attorneys. Or they would be given stupidly short sentences. Due to this, I'd always have to deal with bodies, including dead kids who got caught between domestic violence, despite my warnings to the judges.
The second reason I left is because irrational "normal" people shot at me twice in the span of a month just for being a white officer (that's not an exaggeration, both shooters said that was the only reason, and so did another guy who tried to stab me.)
When you're getting shot at, you don't exactly have time to describe to someone how awkward it would be if you were racist since you wake up next to your black wife every morning. Ironically, I still wanted to stay (hence why I'm still a volunteer), but my lovely African American wife was the one who demanded that I leave work since it was too dangerous. *So we are clear, I'm only pointing out her heritage to stress how dumb this type of behavior is and how otherwise rational people can truly believe in unjustified and immoral actions*
So, in my personal experience, all humans can be evil or immoral, and I believe we should judge the actions rather than the intentions. We saw millions of ordinary German people follow Hitler's orders with complete understanding. I don't think morality is as simple as either of us makes it seem.
This was an interesting conversation; thank you. :)
Bram Stoker also used this in Dracula, building mystique around the count from his effect on Renfield before we meet him.
Not quite. We meet the Count during the first four chapters of the book when Jonathan Harker is imprisoned in Castle Dracula. Although it is true that the Count is absent for a long while after that.
“how to terrify the audience” the answer: be Hannibal Lecter
3:01 thats the scary part we dont know who are the insane ones walking among us...
Antikys you’re right we hide it very well
@@somedude3819 indeed we do
EXACTLY
Thats why it dosent hurt to be a little insane back. At least for me.
*among us*
there’s also the fear behind motivation. the previous inmates look out of their minds- they’re evil out of an inability to stop themselves. hannibal looks completely put together and in control- he’s evil because he Wants to be, he kills because he WANTS to. that’s a horrifying idea to confront.
You're a good narrator and you have good sophistication in your speech.
Mads Mikkelsen's Hannibal portrayal is also so so good. Its one of my favorite shows. dont know why the show's cancelled, although being rated such high.
My favorite show
And i even prever Mads Mikkelsen over Anthony Hopkins. I still love Hopkins of course but Mads took it to another level for me
@@sophiecooper3624I don't get why some prefer Mads over Anthony thats like prefering a mid joker to Heath Ledger.
Hopkins made Hannibal into winning a Oscar, Silence of the Lambs into a top25 ranked imdb movie of all time and also the highest ranked villain of all time by many organisations.
Mads in those hannibal series barely got any recognition really
Mads was good, but at the same time he never seemed insane, like a serial killer.
@@billrerikson6378Mads Mikkelsen played Hannibal in a series while Antony Hopkins in just a movie
The series *wasn't* only focused on Hannibal that's why it's more preferable to some, there are different perspectives and points of view that's what I'm trying to say
As for the comparison you mentioned in The Joker, Heath Ledger played in the Dark Knight if I'm remember correctly while Joaquin Phoenix had a movie focused only on the life of the Joker, the trauma, the difficulties in his life as well as how he became a psychopath
To make a long story short It's not about who is better or worse it's about people's opinions... sometimes it's even the actors themselves that make a show worth watching ❤
I love your videos, I’m thinking about writing stories using your advice. Thank you so much!
I wish you luck :)
The Closer Look Same to you!
MineTurtle Animations Same here this channel gives such fantastic advice!
MineTurtle Animations dont.
MineTurtle Animations Keep in mind that stuff on screen doesn't translate quite so well onto paper. Shots and sound don't exist, only actions, dialogue, and descriptions.
I waited on Anthony Hopkins in Park City, Utah at a ski resort where I was working back in 2007. What a genius actor. I was starstruck but kept it to myself. I couldn't think of anything to say that he hadn't heard a thousand times, so I just was as normal as I could muster.
Did you at least get an autograph?
Ah yes. I love this topic. Thank you a lot for this video.
Little suggestion maybe.... "How to do Dark Humour - American Psycho". Maybe? I've never seen anybody talk about American Psycho as a dark comedy which it obviously is in a big part.
Keep up the great work. I love the fact that we get more video essayists lately.
Hello Clarice still sends shivers down my spine
I liked when she steps into the red light and looks at the picture that was handed to her. The man explains that Hannibal’s heart rate stayed even, unchanging as he bit the nurses tong off. Great way to set him up.
DId You Know?: Hannibal never blinks during The Silence of the Lambs
3:10 - myth debunked
It's diliberate and has a desired psychological effect on Clarice, not a natural blink.
Whe he finally decides to help Clarice, he's smart enough to know whats about to happen, he waits till shes in a vulnerable shocked state. He helps her, but remains in control. He's always several steps ahead psychologically speaking.
it was a point to make him stop his ice cold stare when she said that
@@Gizmex and he blinked, therefore that myth is debunked.
I've never heard anyone say he actually never blinks in the movie. What I remember is the claim that he only blinks 9 times.
Would you ever consider an analysis on trailers and how they get us to want to watch the movies they're promoting?
Sometimes the trailer is way better than the movie
I love video essays like this, they're so informative and fun to listen to in the background. You do amazing work
Expectation subversion isn't just important for horror, but all storytelling. Here, the villain actually appears normal for his reveal in stark contrast to what's expected. We also thought Vader killed Luke's dad and that John Doe wouldn't win in Se7en. Aang was supposed to kill the Fire Lord and Deadpool, at least for a moment, seemed to think about sparing Ajax. Subverting expectation makes for great comedy and drama because ultimately, every good story has a sense of mystery. The audience wants to be surprised.
Don't overdue it like Rian Johnson did with The Last Jedi, though.
Honestly, I think the scariest scene in almost all of film is the scene, (SPOILERS)
Is when Buffalo Bill is looking at her in the dark and she has no idea what he is doing. He doesn’t do anything to her. He just looks.
I found buffalo bill way more terrifying than Hannibal
UNDERRATED COMMENT
She puts the lotion in the basket
@@FlorianFlorian573 or she gets the hose again
Aaron Ellis so did I fr
Hopkins' presence on screen and his performance is top notch in this movie.
Can we just take a second to enjoy the brilliance of Hopkins in his prime? The subtle expressions, even the breaking of eye contact with a blink then he looks at the floor and back to Clarice. Dude won an Oscar with only 24 minutes of screen time