These Nazi Laws Still Exist TODAY! | Feli from Germany
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ค. 2024
- Go to piavpn.com/felifromgermany to get 83% off Private Internet Access with 4 months free!
👉These are regular, German laws that are applied every single day. But what many people don’t know is that they were originally written by the Nazi Regime over 80 years ago!
Correction: 4:09 "Besondere Schwer der Schuld" doesn't always come with "Sicherungsverwahrung" (preventive detention) and vice versa. There are a lot of cases where both of these things apply, but not always.
Get your Bavarian beer mug or Servus t-shirt ▸felifromgermany.com/
Check out my PODCAST (with Josh)▸ / understandingtrainstation or linktr.ee/Understandingtrains...
FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA: Facebook▸ / felifromgermany (Feli from Germany) Support me on Patreon▸ / felifromgermany Instagram▸@felifromgermany▸ / felifromgermany Buy me a coffee▸www.ko-fi.com/felifromgermany
▸Mailing address:
PO Box 19521
Cincinnati, OH 45219
USA
-------------------------
0:00 Founding of the Germany Republic 1949
2:28 Law 1
9:05 Law 2
12:33 Law 3
15:15 Founding of GDR
15:54 Nazi Language in German Constitution
-------------------------
ABOUT ME: Hallo, Servus, and welcome to my channel! My name is Felicia (Feli), I'm 30 years old, and I'm a German living in the USA! I was born and raised in Munich, Germany but have been living in Cincinnati, Ohio off and on since 2016. I first came here for an exchange semester during my undergrad at LMU Munich, then I returned for an internship, and then I got my master's degree in Cincinnati. I was lucky enough to win the Green Card lottery and have been a permanent resident since 2019! In my videos, I talk about cultural differences between America and Germany, things I like and dislike about living here, and other topics I come across in my everyday life in the States. Let me know what YOU would like to hear about in the comments below. DANKE :)
-------------------------
MY FILMING EQUIPMENT
Camera: amzn.to/3mSp0Lf*
MAIN LENS (Sigma 18-35mm F1.8): amzn.to/31IjdgU*
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens: amzn.to/2AT9R3J*
Tripod: amzn.to/2LXpb5t*
Remote: amzn.to/2oe3Hsd*
Lighting: amzn.to/3EWV86O*
Back Light: amzn.to/3gJD8QL
H1 Zoom Recorder (audio): amzn.to/33gKWDf*
Lav Microphone: amzn.to/2VobCPP*
GoPro Vlogging Setup:
GoPro: amzn.to/2OycAav*
Case: amzn.to/2IzIzmY*
Tripod: amzn.to/2os3DoB*
Microphone: amzn.to/31ZR6Y5*
Mic Adapter: amzn.to/2AUq1K3*
Mount: amzn.to/33oDciL*
*These links are Affiliate links. If you buy the product through that link, I'll receive a small provision while the price for you stays the same! Thanks for your support! :)
-------------------------
Music by ARTMAN MUSIC www.artman-music.de/ based on a theme by www.twinmusicom.org/ (CC BY 4.0)
Did you know that these laws are left over from the Nazi Regime?! 😱Go to piavpn.com/felifromgermany to get 83% off Private Internet Access with 4 months free!
*_Correction:_* 4:09 "Besondere Schwer der Schuld" doesn't always come with "Sicherungsverwahrung" (preventive detention) and vice versa. There are a lot of cases where both of these things apply, but not always.
Hallo Feli aus Deutschland! Ich habe Deutsch mit Duolingo auf meinem Handy gelernt. Könntest du die URLs von deutschen Fernsehsendungen auflisten, damit ich sie über mein VPN anschauen kann? Danke!
Verdammt, Echt? Ich dachte immer, wir haben nichts mehr damit zu tun!
Feli, Abortion
10:07 - false, they wanted also women to work as they also started taking care for children like kindergarten, right ?
And then they needed also women in the workforce for the new economy they had started to increase the production before the war and then especially throughout the war.
You might have not looked into the records even though the general wish of the Führer and Himmler had been 4 children per family which was btw just 100% more than the rate of 1930 before he came to power, the number of birth had stalled from 2,000,000 million in 1900 to just 600,000. Third Reich is a very difficult topic and needs a lot of research especially if you had not spoken with those who had lived then and naturally had to vote for Hitler like all those who had been displaced by the USA from the eastern parts of germany after 1918 who had lost their homes, family owned business and properties as big as your eyes could watch owned since the age of the knights by these families.
Grandpa had fought the russians back then and the soviets in WW 2 but always said that he had voted for anyone during the Weimarer Republic who promised to give them back what had been owned by their families for centuries, foremost the graves. And now we buy back the properties one after another cause after Poland had become an EU member state they could no longer reject our will to buy back and develope the are which never had been developed after 1918 except from 1939 to 1942 when all the repairs had been done. The employee from the pig shed came one day to my grandpa with a fork and some others to leave within 14 days or they would not end up well - 1919 .
They fled leaving everything behind forced by polish pig shed workers which then were killed later by the soviets in sept. 1939 cause they hang them up when they retreated from that area and handed the territory over in Okt. 1939.
Grandpa was not mobilized till nov. 1941 and then went to Moscow with the spearheads of the tank corps, later spend many years in siberian POW, but came back and went to the west without seeing the graves of his ancestors again. But we are back again and building up the ruins the others had left behind, piece by piece, acre by acre we buy back what belonged to us.
This is fascinating. You always make such interesting videos.
Hitler was also against smoking and said its bad for humans. Just cause it was Hitler who said it doesnt mean that its wrong and shouldnt be followed....
He was a vegetarian as well... 😉
Funny that Hitler said that of all people
Quite on point
The party also tried to eradicate anything to do with pdf filia. They ended every known pdf file at the time. Not everything the did was wrong
@@LM-oi3sfcan you give me a list of wrong things they did
Bad people can have good ideas, and good people can have bad ideas..
Sometimes it's not the idea that is bad...but the way siad idea gets employed
Isn't the definition of a person the ideas that drive them?
@@joe256A man that can save thousands of people lives can also be the same people that kills thousands.
@@Thunderstruck5150 so then, is he a good man? Or a bad one? Tough questions of life eh?
@@joe256 that’s a fair question.
In my country, the German occupator made physical education (including swimming lessons) compulsory. They also introduced mandatory health insurance. Glad we kept that after liberation.
where r u from
In my country, Sweden, we were lucky to escape mandatory health insurance until 1955. Mandatory health insurance, and government involvement in healthcare makes it 3-4 times as expensive as it should be as well as of less quality.
That's the thing: If the laws make sense and improve quality of living, keep them. No matter who introduced them.
Are you truly liberated?
@@eriklidstrom8706 the US is proving your statement about healthcare wrong every day. We have by far the highest healthcare cost anywhere, and we also have tens of millions of people who are un-insured or under-insured. From my 25 years of buying healthcare coverage in the US, i can tell you that it is ridiculously expensive (complete cost per year is over 20k!) and the experience of going, paying co-pays, medication costs, etc, "shitty" covers it pretty good. average out of pocket cost of healthcare after insurance is 6 grand. I wonder what you would have to be paying in sweden if your assertion was correct. 60 to 80 grand? i don't think so.
It always amazes me how German speakers like Feli can pick up English so well, and if learned young enough or trained long enough, or spend enough time in english speaking countries, their accent becomes nearly flawless.
I like voices and accents, so this is meant with the utmost respect and admiration.
I am an American who lived in Germany for most of Elementary school. Though the school I attended was for American kids, we did have to learn German. My best friends were German twin boys and I eventually picked it up so well, that many Americans and some Germans thought I was a native speaker. Sadly, I lost much of it but, for some reason, I can still shop and order food (because of this, I've made friends with the proprietor of our local German shop), and remember a lot of the songs and poems I knew during that time.
I've had english since 3rd grade. And while that is typical "book english", it set the foundation to learning more afterwards.
And with the connected world nowadays, it really has become lingua franca.
I'm in a casual gaming group, we have finns, french, germans, brits, italians, swedes, spaniards, dutch, polish, israeli and even someone from Iraq. And we communicate in english, because that is a language all of us know to some degree. And using a language is the best way to improve it once you have the basics.
Our german language is more complicated than most other languages, what makes it quite easy to pick up other languages and their specifics.
Also "german language" is just not ONe language but about 30 accents, some quite strange even to most other germans.
So if we travel around even in our own country we have to adapt quickly.
I learned english in basic school, honed it a bit through english/american english movies and books, but travelling abroad showed me how much i still had to learn. Now, with 48 years i get by quite good, even adopting two american accents.
You're never too old NOT to learn...and languages are the keys to the heart of other peoples
@@HappyBeezerStudios I remember that back in the day, there were two Indonesian ham radio operators that would routinely communicate in English because it had a wider variety of cuss words.
@@1s3ngr1m Also you have to remember certain regions have their own languages, like Baden-Württemberg where they speak Swabian.
In Luxembourg, fiscal law is basically this one set during Nazi occupation. Consequence is that the applicable legal language for fiscal matters is german whereas for all other legal matters it is french.
wosst ech mol net; gudd ze wessen!
So why haven't you guys changed it?
@@ColonelSandersLite because French sucks big time I guess,
nah most countries have laws in place that are older and won‘t be fundamentally changed, this is just a quirk of a multilingual country, it doesn‘t matter in the grand scheme of things, because we understand it nonetheless
Auch in Frankreich wurden vor Jahren die Gesetze der Vichy Regierung( Verwaltung unter deutscher Besatzung) wieder eingeführt.
Die aktuelle Politik fusst auf die Gründung der Ur Eu von 1938 in Rom.
Luxembourg is an interesting place! I drove there while on a work trip in a nearby part of Germany. The combo of German, French and English was very cool. I ate at a French style restaurant. Delicious!
My Great-grandfather put his race down as German on his US citizenship application. In those days of the early 20th century "race" had a different meaning than it does today. Today we mostly think of race as European, African, Asian, or Native American. Back then it also had to do with nationalism or region of a continent.
Thank you for the info, I didn’t know this.
In the UK we tend to use ethnicity as opposed to race, especially in official contexts.
For one census, I put down my race as "human." Thankfully, they didn't send a census worker to "correct" my answer.
@@hannahk1306 as far as i'm aware, technically an ethnicity is defined by a common ancestry + a common language + common religious practices + common "traditions" (which is super vague, i know)
When I was applying for therapy, I actually had to put my race down as German as all of the other options were nonsensical 😂
What we Austrians got from Nazis:
Marriage law (inkl. divorcement). There was no divorcement for Catholics before 1938.
Animal protection law
Comercial Code (HGB). Replaced by UGB 2010. But funny the new law still begins with: Introduced by our Emperor Wilhelm II. in the year 1900 (which never was Austrian emperor).
Right side driving Law (yeah before half Austrian drove on the left side. The other half drove right. So it must have been very funny.).
The Finnish criminal code still begins "We Alexander III, Emperor and autocrat over the whole Russia, Czar of Poland, Grand-Duke of Finland etc. etc. etc." (I did not add the "etc." three times. Nothing of the actual text is original.
Don’t forget the Insurance Contract Act and the Insurance Tax Act.
The UGB did not replaced the HGB content wise but was a renaming. Due to this the preamble you mention is still there. It is still kind of funny because the sentence also state that the law was made for Germany:
"Wir Wilhelm, von Gottes Gnaden Deutscher Kaiser, König von Preußen ec. verordnen im Namen des Reichs, nach erfolgter Zustimmung des Bundesrats und des Reichstags, was folgt:"
"We Wilhelm, by the grace of God German Emperor, King of Prussia etc. decree in the name of the Reich, after the approval of the Bundesrat and the Reichstag, the following:"
@@patrickm3981 Jo, was i. Eigentlich sollte nur "Kaufmann" ersetzt werden durch "Unternehmer" und man hat das Gesetz neu verlautbart. Da hätte man einiges ersetzen können auch die Präambel.
*who never was Austrian Emperor.
Well, not only in Germany. When Germany attacked Norway on the 9th of April 1940, we capitulated two months later, and then the Germans shoved that the word 'soscialist' in nationalsocialist actually meant something. In 1941 the Germans introduced 'barnetrygd', which translates to 'children's insurance payment' . That meant that all parents were paid if they had children under 18 years of age, with no consideration of the parents income.
The nazis were planning a welfare state. They also set up a payment system, like the one in Germany. They also made a lot of other laws about state banks, and state guarantees for everyone from farmers to young couples building a house. All these laws were made invalid when the Norwegian exile government returned, but the bureaucrats said that it would be a mistake to invalidate laws that worked fine. So the government 'proposed' the laws they wanted to keep to the Norwegian parliament, which, in turn, agreed, and revalidated these laws, but now with a new postwar date....they did not get all the laws though, some stuck without revision, since the Germans introduced such a mass of new laws. I think that there are so many revisions of the laws the last 30 years, that you can not find them. But the Norwegian law-book as late as 1984 had these laws between 1940 and 1945 which the lawbook said about the German laws still being valid: -Lawes introduced by the German administration and the unlawful Quisling -administration (Quisling was a Norwegian nazi, who we shot after the war), but being validated by Stortinget () (Parliament) after the war. It also contained a much thinner section about the laws made by the exile government in London, in practise only one law from them remained in the 1980s. that had also to be voted for in Parliament.
I always chuckle at how when a country puts the word, “democratic,” in their name, it’s never democratic (DDR, DPRK, DRC).
Don’t forget the DNC.
They were/are more democratic in many important ways than all modern bourgeois republics..
And yet America also claims to be democratic so go figure
@@farkasvilkas Like the US which stubbornly refuses to grant people subsidized NHC. Instead the system is geared towards greed.
Another one is that often times, the more descriptive words there are in a country's full name, in front of the word "of", the more sus they are (eg, Peoples' Republic of China/Republic of China, Peoples' Democratic Republic of Korea/Republic of Korea
As an American living in Germany, I wish more Germans understood what you said, "Modern Germany is not the Germany from 80 years ago." It isn't the same country and other things. Plus, just look at the history of Germany, or at least the area of Europe that now forms Germany. Going back to the "Holy Roman Empire" and further. There is so much to be proud of in German history. Examples are Nietzsche, Kant, Sebastian Lotze, Beethoven, etc. It has such a long history, with so much good, but everyone complains about something that was only nine years of their history. Also, many other countries are guilty of doing things that are just as bad, if not worse, than what happened in Germany 80 years ago. The only real difference is that Germans are over-efficient and document everything fully. Unlike other countries, for example, the Soviets and Khmer Rouge were far worse but didn't document their atrocities in full detail. The British used concentration camps in South Africa during the Boer War. So, as an American in Germany, I'll simply say Germans need to stop shouting, "I'm ashamed to be German." over that.
(By the way, I do not have any German ancestry. According to my family history and DNA Tests, all my ancestors came from Sweden, England, and Scotland before settling in the US. So, I have no reason outside, having found myself living in Germany for various reasons.)
I haven't known so far, that May 1st isn't called "Tag der Arbeit" in my home state NRW. Thank you Feli for making me a little smarter.
I would consider NRW not as state. More as an Anomalie 🤭😉
A little knowledge is a very dangerous thing. The discussion around the "Tag der Arbeit" is another one of those subjects that people really should have some historical knowledge about before adding their opinion. This whole thread is just more "beating on a dead horse".
@@karlheinzvonkroemann2217May Day is a Reich holiday, established in 1933
@@m42037 I knew that.
I love this video for two reasons
1) You do not veer away from critical reflection of the issues you discuss, and
2) You speak and discuss German topics in German, which I find helpful in keeping my language skills alive. (Also, your Bavarian accent reminds me of meine Oma)
She doesn't have a bavarian accent though?
Excellent point. Frank discussion of the legacy the Third Reich is not common. Perhaps these are more frequently discussed in Germany. But I compliment Feli on frankness and fairness with these topics. I learned a lot from this video. Thats the best compliment I can give.
She doesn‘t have a typical bavarian accent/dialect. Only a little bit colored by the bavarian/munich dialect.
I'm from the north and i do not perceive any non-standard accent on her
@@leysont I do, but I studied linguistics so I may be more trained to hear the differences.
Freisler was a despicable character. He was one of the judges in the White Rose show trial. He also presided over the trials of the July 20th defendants. He was the ultimate "hanging judge" with most of his sentences resulting in death. One interesting fact about his is that he was a POW in World War One. He was held in Russia where he studied Bolshevism. Of course, when it became beneficial to his career to switch ideologies, he joined the Nazi Party. That wasn't uncommon back then. Such individuals were known as "Beefsteaks." Red on the inside. Brown on the outside.
In one of the cases (vs. the 20th of July people) he was presiding over, he was so vile, that Goebbels himself decided to NOT publish the records made during the trials. It says a lot if even your "Reichspropagandaminister" considers you to be to crazy/embarassing.
Doesn't surprise me much, as fascism is simply a branch of marxism, like communism.
I didn't know about the beefsteak nickname though. That's hilarious
@@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle Fascism is diametrically opposed to Marxism. One is on the extreme right of the political spectrum, the other on the extreme left. Curiously, because they are both extremists, they do appear to be similar in many respects. Freisler, like many Germans of that period, simply gravitated to the side that benefited them personally.
Freisler was killed in an air raid in early 1945 when a USAAF bomb landed on his courthouse when he stayed behind to collect the papers for his next case before going to the air raid shelter. The papers were of the case of Fabian von Schlabrendorff, a 20 July Plot member who would have been executed if Freisler had lived. Thus von Schlabrebdorff survived the war.
Nobody mourned Freisler's death.
@@patrickdebonis6493 the modern conception of left and right is a false dichotomy based on the seating arrangement of the pre-revolutionary French Estates: we are basically applying 18th Century terms to ideological developments of the 19th and 20th Century. This would be like modern day scientists referring to thermal energy as phlogiston.
Genetically, fascism and national socialism have many of their roots in socialist thought; with Mussolini being one of Italy’s leading socialists pre-WW1. There is also evidence of Hitler holding Bolshevist sympathies in the time immediately after WW1.
Your willingness to discuss this period in the history of Germany is refreshing
quite normal here in germany.
Normal in Germany. However, some aspects of this part of history are never discussed. For example, did you know that Hermann Goring actually had a treaty with the Jews called the "Ha'avara-Abkommen". Or did you know that Hitler befriended a jewish girl in the early 1930s? Another interesting topic is the death of Martin Bormann. According to historian Mark Felton, he did not die in Berlin 1945, but in South America in 1959. However, these things aren't discussed in Germany because anyone speaking about these topics has to fear being nazified.
@@ArdysLoreLibraryMark Felton is a Zionist shill.
@@semiramisubw4864unfortunately you have been taught nothing but lies about that period of German history. The Germany of today has monuments to the Red Army that raped and murdered MILLIONS of German women and children. All around Germany are streets named after communists and traitors and plaques honoring communists and other people who actually hated Germany. Germany is still an occupied nation is this sense.
Also the grotesque "modern art" monuments to the H-event all over Germany that are designed to make Germans feel ashamed of themselves; these ghoulish "monuments" are not healthy and they do nothing but degrade the German spirit.
My addition would be § 265a StGB "Erschleichen von Leistungen".
Due to this law installed by the Nazi regime in 1935 it's a criminal offence, punishable even by up to a year in prison, to use the public transport system without valid ticket.
I know a lot of criminals in Germany, let me tell ya.
I think this law is one of the reasons why our trust system works, as we have no ticket gates
Also, why aren't your friends paying for a ticket? I find this behavior very questionable and deeply unsocial
the whole world laugh at germany becase in every other country in the world leftists can talk with rights and so on but in EU specialy Germany everyone is mad if you tell them something critical you even get charged for stupid things like telling "your a proud german" is totally illegal and everyone will brand you as a nazi :D its hilarious
in berlin they made it leegal to kuddle and have sexual talks and activisions with 3 years olds or faprooms in kindergardens totally okay in germany its defently a fucked up country i would never go there
@@NationGamer090 That's a very German comment
@@mosaloquendo And the truth!
Das mit der Sicherungsverwahrung und der besonderen Schwere der Schuld ist nicht richtig. Die Sicherungsverwahrung ist eine eigene Sache unabhängig vom Strafmaß, die kann vom Richter angeordnet werden, auch bei anderen Strafen wie z.B. Körperverletzung. Besondere Schwere der Schuld heißt, dass die Möglickeit zur Entlassung erst nach 25 Jahren passiert, nicht "schon" nach 15 Jahren.
Die Schwere der Schuld Feststellung legt im Prinzip nur fest, dass beim ersten Antrag auf Haftentlassung der Antrag zurückgewiesen wird und eine Mindestverbüssungsdauer festgesetzt wird. Und das können in seltenen Fällen auch nur 2 Jahre mehr sein, wie in einem Fall aus Bayern vor kurzem. Im Durchschnitt Deutschlandweit sind es 5-10 Jahre on top. Bayern gibt eher noch 10 -20 Jahre darauf. Die Sicherungsverwahrung ist neben der Unterbringung in einem Psychiatrischen Krankenhaus eine sog. Maßregel der Sicherung und Besserung. Juristen sprechen hier von der zweiten Schiene des Strafrechts, wo es nur um den Schutz der Öffentlichkeit vor weiteren Straftaten des Straftäters geht und strafrechtliche Schuld nicht (mehr) vorliegt. Die Sicherungsverwahrung stand vor der Abschaffung, erfreut sich aber wieder wachsender Beliebtheit unter den Schwurgerichtskammern, weil man extrem gefährliche Täter so endgültig aus dem Verkehr ziehen kann. Durch die Rechtsprechung des EMRK Gerichtshofes ist die Ausgestaltung der Sicherungsverwahrung heute eine komplett andere, das wohl auch zurecht.
ich glaube es ging um die definition von Mord, und die hoechststrafe von lebenslang anstatt von Todesstrafe. Sicherungsverwahrung nach ablauf der strafe fuer Mord war der "springende punkt". Your clarifying statement is still a valid one, though.
Das würde auch erklären, warum jeder Messersticher für verrückt erklärt wird...dann kann der Richter sich mit einem Freispruch aus der Verantwortung ziehen und trotzdem maximales Strafmaß anfordern, ohne dem Sachverhalt genauer auf den Grund gehen zu müssen?
Besondere Schwere der Schuld kann auch 16 Jahre bedeuten, bloß eben nicht 15.
@@uliwehner Du verbüßt eine lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe, solange bis du keine Gefahr mehr für Allgemeinheit bist. Und wenn du keine Gefahr mehr für die Allgemeinheit bist, gibt es auch keine Grundlage mehr für eine Sicherungsverwahrung ...Wenn beides gleichzeitig verhängt wird, geht es eher darum, sich abzusichern, falls die Revision die lebenslange Freiheitsstrafe kippt.
Well, the BGB (Germany's Civil Code) stems from the year 1900, when Germany was still an empire. It has been changed a big deal over time, but much of its core has remained unchanged and it continues to be the most important source of law in any civil trial.
A older and nice example for temporary rules that lives long is the ‚Schaumweinsteuer‘ from 1902, a tax on sparkling wine products. It was started to get money to finance the German military ship fleet. But 122 years later, the fleet was destroyed in WW1, it’s still active 😢
Das BGB mit seinen hunderten von Gesetzen stammt in großen Teilen aus 1896 (in Kraft ab 1.1.1900). Es gilt seitdem durchgängig und dürfte das tagtägliche Leben der meisten Deutschen ganz erheblich prägen.
I always appreciate your straight-forward presentation of subjects like these.
Right, there is an old Texan saying "Boy, if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Also, it makes complete sense to keep most of the common laws as they are benign, completely understood by the populace and judicial and law groups, thus easy to implement.
👍🏻👍🏻
I hope you do not equate for common laws to common law
And that applies to the Interstate highway system, "Volkswagen," "Jaguar," for starters, bc they work and have benefited society as a whole.
AFAIK, the Nazis didn't change the common criminal laws. And in fact, they even didn't abolish the Weimar constitution! They acted in a different way. People were thrown in concentration camps simply by an order of a state employee - mainly from Gestapo. It was considered as a preventive measure. That was a key difference between Nazi concentration camps and Stalin's Gulag. In the Soviet Union people got in the Gulag for their crimes (real or imaginary) after a judiciary procedure (was it a court decision or a decision by so called Troyka). In Nazi Germany people got in concentration camps as a preventive measure. They didn't commit any crimes at this moment against the Nazi state. But some Gestapo official decided that you _can_ commit a crime - and you got into a concentration camp. So for Nazis there was no need to change the laws - they simply bypassed them. As for Weymar constitution, the Nazis simply decreed that such and such provisions of it were suspended until further notas. And nobody cared. When Hindenburg died, they didn't abolish the Reichspresident office, they simply decreed that the powers of the Reichspresident went to the Reichskanzler - I.e. to Hitler. In 1942 Hitler demanded extraordinary powers and received it: the Reichstag simply decreed that any decision by Hitler had the power of the law. And consequently, any insubordination to his decision is breaking the law. Very simple. So why bother changing the criminal code? And all this had a very unexpected consequence. After the fall of Nazi state the judiciary happened to be practically spared of denazification . They simply said: what's the problem? We judged based on previous laws!
FIRST, it’s not a “Texan” saying , it’s Southern but not Texan.
Secondly, Texas has one of the most draconian, contradictory state constitutions, made worse by current republicans so a more a propos Texan term would be “if it ain’t broke, break it”
hi Feli❤❤❤ it is always great to hear from you, thank you for your report
You're really stepping up your content! Great job.
Completely unrelated, but it's April 30th and I was just listening to a piece by the German folk band, Faun, and was thinking that you've missed the opportunity to tell us something about Walpurgisnacht ( oder Hexennacht) in Germany. 🙂 If that would be fun to share, please put that on your calendar for next year maybe?
They are a great band, but sadly they went "WOKE".
Check out the community tab here on TH-cam as well as my social media channels on Instagram and Facebook! 😊 I also have a video from 2020 where I covered all German holidays
@@FelifromGermany Awesome! Thanks! (Should have known. 😄)
Thank you for the video. I can't wait for the next show.
Very interesting. Thank you for posting.
Fact Check: The NSDAP did not outlaw labor unions. There was the state-run labor union, which all workers were required to be a member of. This labor union determined how employers can treat and pay workers. Labor union members had regulated hours and pay scale and had protection from being abused by management. TIK History did a video about the fallacy of the "NSDAP outlawed labor unions" myth.
I didn't say "outlaw", I said "eliminate" (in German "zerschlagen"). They occupied the union buildings and arrested the people in charge. There were no independent labor unions afterwards. Instead, just like almost everything in the Third Reich, they were "gleichgeschaltet". Meaning, they were controlled by the Nazi regime. It's like saying North Korea has elections. Like yes, they do, but do they really count?
Fun fact from a German beekeeper: the oldest law in Germany is the bee law. Loosely formulated: "If a swarm of bees leaves your hive, it is your property for as long as you can see it." And a few other beekeeping topics that are regulated here. For example, the capture of wild bees and the like.
This law dates back to the time of the Goths in the Middle Ages. Since the 6th or 7th century, this law has remained more or less in its basic form.
Hi Feli. Not a German law but a US citizenship application still asks if you were ever a member of the Nazi Party.
It’s been 79 years since the war. It’s becoming increasingly unlikely anyone applying might have been a Nazi Party member at any given time.
Yet there’s no question about whether one was ever a Communist.
I don't know, the actual Nazi Party is still around in the US, and there are a bunch of alt right groups with similar beliefs.
I have a neighbor who was in BDM
I`m aware of that application & that rule seems pretty asinine to me since they got a good bunch of nazis & nazi supporters in the US already!
There's the Neo-Nazis. Does that count?
Thank you Feli for this historical articles of left over German laws from the natzi regime is very interesting. Things we probably would not know about here in the states. Again Thank you Feli we learn a lot from your reality of your life.
the whole world laugh at germany becase in every other country in the world leftists can talk with rights and so on but in EU specialy Germany everyone is mad if you tell them something critical you even get charged for stupid things like telling "your a proud german" is totally illegal and everyone will brand you as a nazi :D its hilarious
in berlin they made it leegal to kuddle and have sexual talks and activisions with 3 years olds or faprooms in kindergardens totally okay in germany its defently a fucked up country i would never go there
You are well on your way to 1,000K subscribers Feli and well deserved☺You would make a great college professor with your smarts!
Very interesting stuff! Excellent research and presentation. And editing of course. lol Thanks Feli.
I really appreciate your frankness and openness on these sorts of topics, Feli. Alot of people nowadays will beat around the bush on darker topics, so thanks for being different :)
But not Germans … they are used to work up those times and discuss it excessively … its mainly those that went through those times … seen it in the 80s/90s … I went to German schools st Brit and 3rd Reich was excessively discussed at school. It was mainly the grandparents that struggled with it. Gen X and later have no problems … talk too much about.
Feli, as you mentioned the GDR, I just wanted to point out the curiosity that the BGB and many other laws were kept in effect there for a long time, too. The BGB was abolished by the ZGB only in 1976. Until then, they simply put up an introduction where they underlined that the laws needed to be interpreted in the spirit of the socialist society. During the first few decades there were "Volksrichter" who were given a very short law education due to the need to replace many law professionals that were not politically loyal to the new regime (if you want to know more of the day-to-day rulings in the East German law system, I can recommend: Inga Markovits, Gerechtigkeit in Lüritz).
Side note: Geographically, Spain belongs in the same time zone as the UK and Portugal. Which is where they were from the inception of time zones. But during WW2 they wanted to suck up to the Nazis, so switched to Germany’s time zone. Where they have stayed to this day.
France was forcibly switched during Nazi occupation and never bothered switching back (presumably because all of their neighbours were now on +1 as well).
I didn't know this. thank you for sharing
Indeed.
And for all those discussions about whether Daylight Savings should be abolished I think it would make much more sense to re introduce the old timezone borders. France and Spain would move to UTC where they geographically belong.
britain uses g.m.t. and b.s.t. timezones actually
Suck up? If not for the Germans and Italians Franco would have lost that war to the Communists! Even the word graditude would have been much more appropriate. That said Time Zones aren't political. Not then. not now and not ever!
One thing I found intresting differences around taxes. In canada you never technical file your return with your spouse each return is sperated but you can't file without knowing your spouse social insurance number and there net income. If your following tax law you can't hide income from your spouse.
I am not sure if this is different or not but you have no choice on your marriage status in canada. Each marriagal statuses has a definition. If have being living together in conjugal relationship for 12 months you are in common law and treat the same as married for taxes purposes.( you can be common law in less then 12 months if there is child from the two parents or if both parents take on parental roles for a child). If your common law then you must file your taxes with your spouse net income.
It's optional to submit two forms in Germany as well. One is not forced into the "Ehegattensplitting."
In the UK you don't "file" taxes at all (unless you're self-employed) - income taxation is all automatic and based on your salary. The money that is received in your bank account has already had things like tax and pension deductions applied.
I think there may be some kind of marriage benefits, but that's completely separate and I'm pretty sure mostly applies to people married before a certain date (when working norms were different and married women were often fired).
ok
In the UK we call it 'early spring bank holiday' and it is held on the first Monday in May. There is also one at the end of May.
I thought we called it May Day?
In Canada, we celebrate both May Day (International Workers' Day) and Labour Day (1st Monday of September).
@conlon4332 the US calls it May Day
@@godstenrules Well my mum calls it May Day.
Nothing to do with German 1st of May … but I love our 2 Nay bank holidays … and I live that compared to Germans do not lose it when a bank holiday falls on a weekend … in Germany bad luck if its a Sunday … here we get the next day off if a bank holiday fall on a free day.
I find it a bit ironic that International Workers Day is celebrated everywhere BUT the very country where it takes its roots. Also, please notice the difference in naming between "worker day" and "labour day".
Mainly because of its association with Communism.
@@BradanKlauer-mn4mp pretty much. McCarthy still doing his job in the grave.
@@brettwillard8892we didn’t want labor day politicized, in other words, Lenin doing his job from the grave. 😏
Well the US does celebrate it, just on a different day. The US already had Labor Day celebrations in September before the Haymarket Riots, so it made sense to keep it on the same day
@@BradanKlauer-mn4mp No wonder they call us europeans communists. With strong unions, socialism/communism inspired holidays and even a party that started out as a socialist workers party, that has been around in that form since 1875, and was in the late 19th/early 20th century the largest marxist party in europe.
I always really enjoy your videos. The way they’re structured they provide an educational aspect while not being so educational that it becomes boring. It’s a perfect medium and I also like how you speak in German then you translate what was said. Gives a look into the uniqueness of the German language. Looking forward to your next video Feli! 🙂
as a german american , i really love you addressing these topics ,, alot of ppl dont have this knowlege in the states .. tho easily looked up. keep up the great work
the whole world laugh at germany becase in every other country in the world leftists can talk with rights and so on but in EU specialy Germany everyone is mad if you tell them something critical you even get charged for stupid things like telling "your a proud german" is totally illegal and everyone will brand you as a nazi :D its hilarious
in berlin they made it leegal to kuddle and have sexual talks and activisions with 3 years olds or faprooms in kindergardens totally okay in germany its defently a fucked up country i would never go there
So why would anyone move to the US for? 🤔😐
@@user-jh1kl4ew7fNonsense question!
The US general knowledge is pretty poor … seen it with exchange students from North Dakota … horrible questions they asked.
You're so straight up on the truth. It's so refreshing, I absolutely adore you.
Thats pretty normal for Germans … gen x onwards is used to the topic from a young age at school … went to school in Germany and it was a topic on heavy rotation …
I actually can really see the benefit of financially encouraging one parent to stay at home and be around for the kids. In many countries both parents feel pressure to go to work and leave their children in childcare all day. Enabling parents to actually spend time with their children sounds like a good thing to me. Plus what's the alternative? Make families with stay at home parents worse off, or get less tax money? They're not good alternatives. I think it might be more important to normalise stay-at-home dads, as either way it's better for children to have at least one parent who is able to be there for them, rather than having both work all day.
The alternate is to have a proper childcare support. In Germany it is virtually nonexistent for kids younger than 3 years. Even for older kids it is awful. I compare country where I am born (Yugoslavia, Serbia). So in Serbia there is no difference between Krippe (for kids up to 3 years) and Kindergarten. That is the same institution. They will internally have specialized professionals and rooms adjusted to small kids. Kids are grouped by generations like in school so teachers can easily workbwith them. Teachers have MSc and are well paid. In Germany uneducated amateurs on practicum and ausbildung paid a bit more than construction workers (who are paid so little that no German born people works on construction sites). They are there just to keep your kid with other kids 4 generations together. Even that they do badly so older and aggressive kids will make problem younger kids. Kindergarten in Serbia has long working hours so you do not need to run from working place. You decide when to put and pick your kid. In Germany they act as they own your kid so you have to brig kid when they say an pick him in slot of 15 minutes! German obsession with punctuality at the peak. In Serbia kids get food in Kita. In Germany you pack breakfast every morning. In Serbia if it is a working day Kita works. In Germany they have a custom that public services just take a whole week as nonworking becase 1 day is a holiday! They don't give a heck abot parents that have to work. And specially comes in Sommers when they have a month of being closed. All of that pushes ladies to stay at home for 3 years (plus Krippe is extremely expensive and har to find) because in 95% they have lower salary and are more bound to kids. After 3 years they search for part-time job because of Kindergarten working hours. So ladies are very much discriminated. They sacrify their career. But also Germany is on huge lost having hslf of population not being able to fully contribute to state budget. Instead of coming back to work in 1 year it takes more and it it goes on part-time jobs below her qualifications. And also it forces parents to have less children. Just compare French and German birth rates...
Find the mistake. Yes there is an alternative. You are talking a lot about children and not much about marriege. Give the benefits only to people with children
In some countries they have universal daycare. That comes with its own issues, though. Stay at home Dads are currently impractical because in most cases, the Dad starts off making more money than the Mom, leading to an issue whereby if he stayed at home, the family would lose the majority of its income.
@@unconventionalideas5683 I have known and heard of a good number of cases where the mother makes more and yet she is the one who quits her job, or at least is pressured to do so. In face that exact situation basically ended up ruining a family friend's marriage, which I could tell you about if you want to know (keeping them anonymous obviously).
@@conlon4332 That is bullshit, because in 99% the woman decides if she continue to work or not and the father have no say
Most of the world May 1st is a Holiday for a holiday for workers; but in the UK it is May day which goes back much longer...
Early May Day has nothing to do with the 1st May celebrations … traditionally focusing in labourers and their rights.
Liking your videos for for some time now but this one is really an eyeopener. Intelligente Frau. Subscribed.
One dark dark law that was carried over from the Nazi regime, but was only abandoned a quarter century after the war, was the Nazi version of Paragraph 175, which criminalized homosexuality. Paragraph 175 had been law since 1871, but the Nazis revamped the law in 1933, which brought it to a whole new level of aggressive persecution. So in the strictest sense it isn't a Nazi era law, but the Nazis took the law and re-did it to support their ideology. So it kinda/sorta is.
It was in force until 1969. So while all the other surviving members of communities that were imprisoned during the Nazi era got to go home at the end of the war, gay men were merely transferred from the concentration camps to the prison system.
Put yourself in these guys' shoes: what was previously open and tolerated suddenly became the equivalent of a capital crime and you were hunted down, rounded up and put into concentration camps and possibly experimented on. Somehow you survive to see your persecutors defeated, and fellow inmates liberated. But instead of freedom, you are put in a state prison for another 24 years, if you live long enough.
Additionally, the law was used to imprison gay people in the period after the war. It wasn't until 1969 that Paragraph 175 was negated and gay men let out of the prisons.
(In the GDR there was a similar situation; Paragraph 175 was in force until 1957 but wasn't removed from the legal system until 1968.)
However, the convictions still remained on their records, which could cause a lot of problems when searching for jobs, housing, applying for credit, etc. Post-war compensation was denied to these victims because technically, they were imprisoned under a pre-Nazi law that was still in effect, and such a conviction on their records precluded any compensation. The German government did not annul the convictions of those imprisoned under Paragraph 175 until 2002, and then only for those convicted during the Nazi era, not for those after.
A general pardon and wiping of records for everyone convicted under Paragraph 175 didn't happen until - get this - 2017. That's only 7 years ago.
The German government decided to compensate those who were imprisoned under the law, both during and after the war, in 2021. Three years ago. Not that there were many survivors left, except for a handful of old men.
So the abolition of Paragraph 175, the expunging of convictions from peoples' records, and the compensation came way way WAY too late for almost all the victims, who were dead, and was far too little far too late. However, a symbolic mea culpa is better than no acknowledgement at all.
What do you think, what happens when a special religion will be in charge in Germany in few decades?
We don't have to fear radical, conservative christians taking over germany. We are not the U.S.
@@brittakriep2938 I don't know what you are referring to. Religion? Please explain.
@@brittakriep2938 Go vote for the AFD and let your pathetic brain atrophy further. Right-wing, intolerant, nationalist trash
@@bennett8535 : Glauben sie, der Islam macht das ganze Lbqt und woke Zeug mit?
I love your videos and am always impressed with the growth and development of Germany after ww2. As a child I lived there for nearly 9 years. Job well done! Again, thankyou.
Hope your root canal went well and you're feeling much better!
It's not until tomorrow... I can't wait!!
Thank you for the videos you make. Especially this one.
Well, a state in this country just reinforced a law passed during our Civil War over 150 years ago, so....Great video as always, Feli! Love your content!
Arizona
Even setting aside the modern policy implications of that law, it's bizarre to retain laws that were passed before the state was... you know... a state... without at least checking them for consistency with modern ideas.
@@DarklordZagarna I can't speak for Germany but in the case of Arizona, that's the whole point. They're against modern ideas.
Don't blame the whole state; the majority of us expected the AZ Supreme Court to use common sense and say the 1864 law was superseded by the newer law. Fortunately, a couple of them are up for re-election in November. The state Senate is expected to pass repeal today, 1 May 24, after which it will be signed by the governor.
@@romad357 Yes, of course. But "they" I should note that it's the rightwing wackadoodles that are unfortunately still in control in some key places in this country, not even something done by majority vote.
Actually, the tax splitting isn't described correctly. As tax is deducted monthly from the payslip of each spouse, but at the tax declaration in the following year the couple is taxed as a couple, without splitting the couple pays more tax monthly, but gets a refund after the text declaration. So if you pay to much tax in January, you would get the refund about june next year. With splitting the lower income spouse pays more tax and the higher income less tax, but in total less tax is deducted monthly. After tax declaration in the following year the total tax is the same as without splitting, but the result is nearer to the amount you paid with monthly deductions. Also it can result in a refund or paing a bit more than deducted.
The splitting just effects the moment you pay the tax, not the total amount the couple has to pay. With a pay gap but without splitting you borrow money to the state and get it back later.
Most people do not understand this.
As a retired family law judge, I have to say that you are wrong and Feli is right.
@@xar1234 As some one working in a tax firm, they were both wrong but feli to an higher degree.
Vielleicht auf Deutsch besser verständlich: Entscheidend für die Steuer für das ganze Jahr ist, ob ein Paar gemeinsame oder getrennte Steuerveranlagung hat. Bei der Steuererklärung. Nicht, ob man ein Splitting auf der Lohnsteuerkarte durch unterschiedliche Steuerklassen hat. Letzeres betrifft nur den automatischen Abzug vom Gehalt bei abhängig Beschäftigten.
Auch wenn jährlich Wahlfreiheit besteht, ob man gemeinsam oder getrennt veranlagt, hat die getrennte Veranlagung steuerlich keine Vorteile. Sie kann allenfals das Gleiche ergeben, wenn beide das gleiche Einkommen haben oder beide Spitzensteuersatz zahlen. Die gemeinsame Veranlagung ist daher der Regelfall; schon um Streit zu vermeiden, wer die aus dem gemeinsamen Budget bezahlte Handwerkerrechnung absetzen darf.
Die Wahl, ob man ein Splitting durch die Steuerklassen vornimmt, trifft man vor dem Steuerjahr. Die Wahl, ob man gemeinsam oder getrennt veranlagt, nach dem Steuerjahr bei der Steuererklärung.
Die Gründe, auch verheiratet getrennt zu veranlagen, liegen nicht in der zu zahlenden Steuer. Ein Grund ist beispielsweise, dass beide Partner die Erklärung unterzeichnen müssen und gesamtschuldnerisch für die abzuführende Steuer haften. Wenn es in der Ehe schon krieselt, kann das ein Problem werden. Aber auch bei natürlichen Unsicherheiten, wenn ein Partner z.B. Freiberufler ist.
Auch mit Splitting auf den Lohnsteuerkarten und damit für den geringer Verdienenden höheren und dem höher verdienenden geringeren Abzügen als bei Einzelveranlagung - kann hinterher dann doch noch Einzelveranlagung nötig werden. Wenn sich das Paar nicht mehr vertraut und deshalb keine gemeinsame Steuererklärung abgibt, müssen sie getrennt veranlagen. Da muss dann der besser verdienende meist nachzahlen, der andere bekommt was wieder - aber insgesamt werden vom Paar mehr Steuern gezahlt.
Also weiterhin: Das Splitting der Steuerklassen betrifft die automatischen Abschläge auf die für das Jahr zu zahlende Einkommenssteuer. Die tatsächlich zu zahlende Steuer für das Jahr ändert sich durch dass Splitting selbst nicht.
Auch wenn man kein Splitting hat, kann man im Nachhinein gemeinsam veranlagen. Regelmäßig z.B. im Jahr der Hochzeit. Umgekeht kann man aber auch im Nachhinein getrennt veranlagen - häufig im Jahr der Scheidungsbeantragung, wenn einer dem anderen nicht mehr weiter traut, als er ihn werfen kann...
Man muss sauber unterscheiden zwischen dem Splitting der Steuerklassen und der Art der Veranlagung.
Der Grund für das Splitting ist schlicht, dass bei unterschiedlichen Einkommen und beabsichtigter gemeinsamer Veranlagung zunächst deutlich zu viel Steuern gezahlt würden. Auch wenn es dann später bei der gemeinsamen Veranlagung das Geld zurück gibt, verringert dies doch herade in der Phase einer Familiengründung die Liquidität.
You also could have mentioned:
- Muttertag (not a law of course but still popular today....)
- the first animal protection law worldwide
- das "Heilpraktiker-Gesetz" vom Februar 1939
just to name a few
May 1st is also Labor Day here in Brazil!
No work tomorrow!! YAY! ^_^
Yeah its almost everywhere
In der DDR wurde der 1. Mai viel stärker gefeiert. Neben dem 7. Oktober, dem Gründungstag der DDR war der 1. Mai der zweitwichtigste Feiertag der DDR. Die DDR verstand sich ja als Arbeiter- und Bauernstaat und so war der 1. Mai ein internationaler Kampftag der Arbeiterklasse. Es wurde vom Staat Märsche organisiert, bei den Werktätigen war es Pflicht, mitzumarschieren. Als Symbol diente die rote Nelke. Schüler mussten in Pionieruniform mitmarschieren. Die SED - Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands, sicherte so ihren Führungsanspruch in der DDR. Die Straßen und Häuser wurden mit der schwarz-rot-goldenen DDR-Fahne und der roten Arbeiterfahne geschmückt. Selbst die Eisenbahn (Deutsche Reichsbahn) wurden entsprechend ausgestattet. Wenn die staatlichen Veranstaltungen zu Ende waren, wurde anschließend gefeiert.
Gefewiert wurde nachdem? Vielleicht weil es vorbei war, so man endlich eine Bier mir Schnapps und eine Bratwurst in ruhe geniessen konnte ohne dass eine Apparatchik sich dazwischen einklemmte.
Excellent presentation, Feli
Okay, I'm from NRW, and 54 years ago I marched with my parents and then-Chancellor Willy Brandt to the big rallye , and I never knew that May 1 is not "Tag der Arbeit" in my state -- so thanks!
In the Netherlands there are still laws from the when Napoleon occupational us there are also still laws which date from 1940 -45
without Napoleon we would not have last names in the Netherlands. Some people thought they could pull one over on the French bureaucrats by choosing silly last names. They thought these last names would be abolished again after the French occupation was over, but now their descendants are still stuck with them. So that is why there are now people whose last names can be translated to : "born naked", "early in the meadow" , "butterhead' , "poor person" ,......
@@harenterberge2632 correct also our complete law structures is fully still a french thing just like the constitution.
@@tommeirmans our first constitution was indeed written during the first french occupation in 1798. But our current constitution descends from 1815 and was thus written after Napoleon was gone. But since then it had many changes, so the French influence is not so large anymore.
Dear Feli,
you forgot one law. It may seem that it is not as consequential as the definition of murder or taxation rules. Yet it has deep implications. It is the law about chimney sweeps.
Originally, the law was coined in 1937 and stayed until the early 2000 and it was changed only because of paragraphs that monopolized the region into "sweep-areas" (Kehrbezirke) where only the official chimney-sweep was allowed to work. These regulations contradicted EU-rules about free markets and had to be changed to comply with EU-regulations. So the Schornsteinfegergesetz became the Schornsteinfegerhandwerksgesetz. Some regulations were changed because of the compliance problem, some terminology was updated and changed but the core of the law stayed as it was. Including a paragraph that was introduced into the law in 1937.
Gesetz über das Berufsrecht und die Versorgung im Schornsteinfegerhandwerk (Schornsteinfeger-Handwerksgesetz - SchfHwG)
§ 1 Eigentümerpflichten; Verordnungsermächtigungen (...)
(3) Jeder Eigentümer oder Besitzer eines Grundstücks oder eines Raums ist verpflichtet, dem bevollmächtigten Bezirksschornsteinfeger und sonstigen Beauftragten der zuständigen Behörden für die Durchführung der in den §§ 14, 15 und 26 bezeichneten Tätigkeiten sowie von Tätigkeiten, die durch Landesrecht vorgesehen sind, Zutritt zu den Grundstücken und Räumen zu gestatten. Jeder Besitzer ist zusätzlich verpflichtet, dem mit Schornsteinfegerarbeiten Beauftragten für die Durchführung von in § 2 Absatz 1 Satz 1 bezeichneten Tätigkeiten Zutritt zu gestatten.
(4) Sofern ein Eigentümer oder Besitzer eines Grundstücks oder eines Raums
1. den Zutritt zu dem Grundstück oder dem Gebäude entgegen Absatz 3 oder
2. die Durchführung einer Tätigkeit, die auf Grund einer der in Absatz 3 bezeichneten Vorschriften durchzuführen ist,
nicht gestattet, erlässt die zuständige Behörde unverzüglich eine Duldungsverfügung. § 25 Absatz 3 und 4 ist entsprechend anzuwenden.
(5) Das Grundrecht der Unverletzlichkeit der Wohnung wird nach Maßgabe der Absätze 3 und 4 eingeschränkt.
Law on professional law and care in the chimney sweep trade (Chimney Sweep Trade Act - SchfHwG)
§ 1 Owner's obligations; Authorizations to issue regulations (...)
(3) Every owner or possessor of a property or a room is obliged to grant access to the authorized district chimney sweep and other representatives of the responsible authorities to carry out the activities specified in Sections 14, 15, and 26 as well as activities provided for by state law to the properties and rooms. Each owner is additionally obliged to allow access to the person responsible for chimney sweeping work to carry out the activities specified in Section 2 Paragraph 1 Sentence 1.
(4) If an owner or possessor of a property or a room
1. access to the property or building contrary to paragraph 3 or
2. carrying out an activity that is to be carried out based on one of the regulations referred to in paragraph 3,
is not permitted, the responsible authority will immediately issue a toleration order. Section 25 paragraphs 3 and 4 must be applied accordingly.
(5) The fundamental right to the inviolability of the home is restricted by paragraphs 3 and 4.
The law was introduced to spy on the German people, to gather information about what people read, how they talked in their homes, whether there were possible hideouts, or to gain floor plans.
This 87-year-old law still inflicts the "fundamental right to the inviolability of the home". When a homeowner (or tenant) refuses to let the authorized district chimney sweep carry out his tasks, e.g. refuses to let him into the house, the chimney sweep is allowed to call police and enforce entry - without a court order. Chimney sweeps have more rights than police, customs, or district attorneys. Think about it.
CU twinmama
Another German law which many people are not aware of, but exists today, dates to 1935. It prohibits the formation of any monarchist political parties in Germany. The Allies insisted on it remaining even after the Establishment of the German Federal Republic.
A recent poll showed that a large number of Germans it seems want their monarchy back, even if only in a ceremonial role, a la the U.K.
@@johnh.tuomala4379First of all wrong year. The Nazis forbade all other parties in 1933.
I couldn't find a specific law against monarchistic parties - only Basic Law Article 21 which prohibits all parties that actively work against the constitution. No specifics on the monarchy. Could you specify your sources?
The most recent polls I could find (2023) state that only 23% percent of interviewees would like to have a monarchy. Personally, I don't know a single person who wants the monarchy back. But I know a lot of people (mostly women) who devour glossy magazines with reports about the monarchies in Europe, German and international celebrities. They're fascinated by glitz and glamour.
@@twinmama42It always depends on the intention and wording of such polls. I bet nearly no one wants a monarchy for political reasons. It's always about the glamour or nostalgia aspect with big official festivities like there are in the UK where many people come together to celebrate the country. We don't have anything like that in Germany.
@@Tokru86 That'S totally true.
@@Tokru86 Didn't Germany only have a monarch for a relatively short period of time - given that there wasn't really a Germany at all until about 1870? Correct me if my German history is off.
My grandfather died in the war and Hitler had my Uncle killed because he was challenged. My mother was 4 and saw the bombing of stuttgart. She was in the attic playing and ran down yelling about fireworks in Stuttgart. They all yelled Stuttgart is being bombed and ran to the basement.
I'm so sad for the horror and loss your family suffered
Thank you.
@@pigoff123 may God give you the peace that passes understanding and know that He is with you, always
Well at least Hitler committed suicide in his own bunker
Feli, being I am old, from Ohio and from German heritage I love your content. I have a lot of respect for you as you come to this country and have a mutual respect for both cultures. This was by far my favorite video you have posted.
Many of the laws in the United States date back to before the war for independence, to English common law. The establishment of the United States did not require all existing laws to be rewritten.
We've even had Supreme Court cases that cited Roman Imperial laws.
@@danielbishop1863 makes sense since Rome was the greatest civilization to ever exist.
Vary interesting video. Similarly, there are a lot of weird laws still on the books in America. Fpr instance, in the state of Georgia, it's illegal to allow your donkey to sleep in a bathtub. 😂
LOL so if your donkey DOES sleep in the bathtub do you go to jail or does the donkey?? 😂
@@AngelaVEdwards lol It's usually just a fine.
Some of those "dumb laws" lists are deliberately worded to sound weirder than they actually are.
Like in one state (I think either Florida or Louisiana), it's illegal to tie your pet alligator to a fire hydrant. Which is technically true, but only because it's illegal to tie *any* animal to a fire hydrant, in case in gets the firefighters' way.
From the donkey perspective, it makes sense😂
There are probably still old laws in existence in most countries. In England all taxi drivers should carry a bale of hay for the horse pulling the taxi. I believe this law still hasn't been repealed despite horse-drawn taxis being withdrawn many decades ago
An incredibly informative and interesting episode (as always 🙂)
Love your voice, the way you handle both of these languages is incredible. No one would ever guess you weren't from Cincinnati originally and of course your German is spot on and is wonderful to listen to. I watch a ton of Nazi videos, usually it helps put me to sleep at night along with other documentaries. I hate the Nazi's, but I'm always intrigued by how they were able to take over Germany the way they did during that time period. Hitler had almost the whole country eating out of his hand, but he couldn't help but be the monster he truly was. He had it made for a long time there but continued to push forward with his evil plans of world conquest and ended up destroying himself and the whole country. Pretty amazing that some of the laws that they put on the books are still in place, I would have never believed that.
Der Staat wurde 1867 als Norddeutscher Bund gegründet. 1949 hat sich das politische System sowie der Name geändert. Völkerrechtlich ist es jedoch das selbe Objekt. Daher gibt es auch Gesetze aus dieser Zeit, genau wie aus der Zeit des Kaiserreichs und der Weimarer Republik, nicht bloß des NS-Regimes.
Und noch ältere Gesetze!
I impress by friends by telling them I watch Feli from Germany :)
makes sense to me
BS
@@mylesc99 your comment was BS
@@user-lk2cj2qs1dYour Mom's comment was BS.
ok
Other laws that remained in place:
1. That there are casinos. These had been banned in the German Empire, and the Weimar Republic kept the ban, but the Nazis reinstituted them (perhaps as a means of getting money for the State, but that is speculation).
2. In private law, there used to be a rule that when something had to be done by a specific State's government but you didn't know which one, the responsibility went to the Federal Council. (E. g., registering a club with no clear seat within the country.) But the Nazis in 1934 abolished the Federal Council when the abolished the States, and so the responsibility went to "the Reich minister responsible", viz. that of the Interior. Now the Basic Law insituted a Federal Council once more, with constitutional powers (with heavy differences in detail) akin to the old one; but the *private-law* powers of the old one remain with the Federal Minister for the Interior to this day.
Thank you Feli, I really enjoy your presentations.
What you say about Ehegattensplitting is just not true. When a woman returns to work/increases her salary, it has exactly the same effect as when the husband earns more (I stick to the gender roles from your example). If she is in tax group 5, a lot of taxes will be deducted from her salary, but you can also choose class 4 with factor to even that out. No matter which group you choose, after filing your tax return you'll always end up with the same.
Also if the women don't work, they could claim gouvernment support because without the "Ehegattensplitting" the marriage is not considered as a financial unit anymore
I was stationed in Germany in the early 70's just outside of Mannheim. I got an international drivers license(?) so I could drive there. I seem to remember that it was considered a felony to splash people on the sidewalk when driving by in your car. Is that a false memory or basically true? Does anyone know?
I am not sure It's a law, but for sure it's a no go and a topic in driving lessons
I think splashing people can be considered 'Körperverletzung' (causing bodily harm?), e.g. if it happens on a cold day in winter. That would be indeed be a felony. But I'm just guessing here.
For sure you owe damages to the victim, whether it’s a felony or not.
@@louismart Thank you for your reply
@@camiro66 Thank you, I guess when I was a student driver in California, it didn't rain enough to be an issue
We call someone a murderer not because she/he was born that way but because she/he murdered someone else. Gardener or plumber also aren't born that way and we have nouns for them. The same for traitor or author.
Sehr interessantes und anspruchsvolles Thema hervorragend umgesetzt.
Regarding laws and principles that were established or at least heavily pushed forward during the 3rd Reich and that still exist...
"Tierschutzgesetz" (animal protection/welfare act) would be one that comes to my mind.
Yes, Hitler loved animals more than humans.
I thought "spouse splitting" was going to tie back into the murder law. :)
I'm thinking of Hans Reiser, though that was in California, not in Germany.
Ah, are you a fan of Bodo Wartkes "Ja Schatz"? ;)
I thought it would be something to do with bigamy.....
Thanks for sharing this information Feli☺
Fascinating. Thanks, Feli!
In Massachusetts, it's illegal to shoot a whale from inside your car.
*I am absolutely AMAZED that you don't have a discernable accent. You speak EXACTLY the way I do and I was born, raised, and still live in the Pacific Northwest; Western Washington State.* 🤩🥳
P.S. I took three years of your language in school and I NEVER mastered it. 😟
Yes. Feli sounds West coast (but not Valley Girl) to me. I've also lived in western Washington much of my life, and for me, "western Washington accent" is kind of a contradiction in terms. Not like the south or the Bronx, anyway.
She sounds midwestern to me.
I'm also from Western Washington State (for our international readers, I'll point out that Washington, D.C. is a city on the East Coast of the United States, which is the nation's capital, and Washington State is an entire state on the West Coast of the United States, and a state is a much larger area of land than a city-a state can encompass many cities). I think everywhere in the western USA and western Canada-with the exceptions of the former Confederate states-can all be considered pretty much the same accent, and you're right, that's the accent that Feli talks with, and as good as indistinguishable from a foreign accent-at least she doesn't talk like Siegfried on "Get Smart."
She does have an accent but it’s an American one with a little German twang. Hardly surprising though. My wife’s grandmother spoke English with a Welsh accent with a German twang after migrating post ww2 to marry her grandfather in wales.
This is so cool, thank you for sharing!
Fascinating about the definition of murder. As you translated something felt off to me, but it wasn’t until you described it as a description of the person that my feeling made sense. I love your research and presentation.
5:52 But that's not cruel or malignant? Yeah, I'm not buying that.
What aren’t you buying? Makes perfect sense … if you kill someone its not necessarily murder … it can be accidental … one impulsive blow and the person you argued with is dead … then it simply does not apply as you did not act intentionally … malignancy behind it is missing and you are not acting based upon cruelty … as you did not act to solely see someone die. What she says is nonsense … in the legal system they are trained to use the law … then it is quite obvious.
@@GanymedeXD I'm saying that the holocaust was cruel and malignant.
@@GanymedeXD I mean it is but (Attention, this is based on my rookie true crime knowledge lol I'm not a lawyer and I'm sure there are many resources out there that can break this down in a more detailed way), "cruel" is usually used when the killing took place in a particularly cruel way, meaning the victim was tortured or "overkilled" (which is when the killer keeps adding injuries even though the first injuries would have already "sufficed" to kill the person.). And malignantly is usually used when the victim didn't have any chance to defend themselves, e.g. when a person attacks from behind or when the victim is asleep. Don't quote me on it but this is kind of the general idea I believe.
These are some interesting laws indeed. I'm curious if the average German knows about these or are they like some of our laws here in America, for instance in my home state of Florida, (if 5 or more indigenous people are on your property they're considered a war party and you can "defend" your home 😳🙄) yet we haven't struck that from our books....🤔
I think those who listen to true crime podcasts a lot (like myself 😅) know at least about the history of the murder law but the rest of them, I didn't know until I started my research for this video!
will point out the 14th amendment almost certainly nullified that florida state law
there's def some interesting examples of such old, nonsensical laws that aren't nullified like that, tho, like (in many areas) duels refereed by consenting magistrates as a possible way to solve disputes
It's because it wouldn't stand up in court. They are blue laws
@dead-claudia sigh of relief.... so in essence it's laziness cause they have been struck but they just haven't removed them....
@@dead-claudia Germany has a few similar cases. Some German states still have the death penalty as an option in their constitutions, but they're all overruled by the federal constitution that explicitly bans it.
Your videos are fascinating!
I didn't realize you're down the street from me! Love the channel content.
6:16 Wouldn't that be the same if it was defined as premeditated? I mean, he likely didn't beat her up with the intention of killing her, or could certainly argue such very easily. Killing someone in their sleep? Not so much. It seems much more likely you would be planning to kill.
The old definition was not "premaditated". It was "intentional" with an exception for highly emotional actions. No prior actions or planning were required.The only way you could get to manslaughter under the old version of the penal code was if you killed in a fit of rage, by a request or accidentally.
The NS version meant that things like killing in a duell were now manslaughter, no longer murder.
Ausgezeignet Good video Feli!
During the 1980's and 1990's, I was a US Army Military Police Officer in West Germany and as such I had to be familiar with various West German laws. I also went to school to obtain the hard to get German Hunting License. Where I further learned allot about the history of the Hunting and Weapons laws of Germany and other European countries as well.
Many of today's modern German Hunting laws stem off the laws made by 3rd Reich Jaeger Meister Herman Goering.
What is amazing is that Chancellor/ Dictatior Hitler actually loosened up the firearms/ weapons laws in 1938 from the privious Versailles Treaty imposed draconian firearms laws of 1920, and 1928. The impact of loosing the weapons law in 1938 not only effected Nazi party membership, it also effected the whole of all statures of German citizens.
By allowing the common avarage people the means to protect themselves.
Where today's modern Germany's Weapons/ Firearms laws are much more stringent/ draconian than the 1938 Hitler Weapons Act law. The Western occupation Zone Powers in the 1950's Westen occupation zones of Germany allowed for private firearms ownership and hunting again bringing back the 1928 stringent Weapons law that Hitler loosened up. As well as the 3rd Reich's Hunting laws/ system.
Over the years this 1928 stringent law has been made even more stringent in post war West and now united Germany.
With reguards to private firearms/ weapons ownership, it is ironic that German citizens had more freer laws under the Dictatiorship of Hitler than as is in the current so-called "Free" Democratic Federal Republic of Germany.
Also in Socialist Yugoslavia Dictatior Tito also allowed the common people to own Firearms. So not every Dictatior disarms their common citizens.
Real factual history is often different than what some political power factors want the masses of people to believe!
Keep the videos coming!
As you mentioned Hermann Göring......on 16th August 1933 he, as Prime Minister of Prussia at that time, prohibited vivisection of animals of all kinds within Prussia. The first country worldwide to do so....
And Tito BTW was the only Eastern Bloc "dictator" who allowed his citizens to travel to the west and work there; sometime in the 80s Poles followed suit....which our eastern broithers and sisters did not like at all. Imagine them watching Polish cars passimg through East Germany in either direction and not being allowed to travel themselves, not even within Germany so to speak.
cool --- was a U.S. Army kid in West Germany -- Mainz, Fulda (67,000 Warsaw Pact tanks over the eastern horizon...), Frankfurt
(Saw Outpost Alpha on the Inter-German Fence 2x, 2nd time with M113 APC ride due to recent Grenzschutz bullets crossing the border -- the U.S. soldiers had to watch an East German man bleed to death in "No Man's Land" -- the wide strip of Kill Zone land DDR had to sacrifice for keeping a tight border -- 0nly DPRK does that today,
although Kingdom of Jordan guards will shoot West Bank Palestinians trying to cross the Jordan River...)
+ a college Christmas + Summer 1989 in Gießen -- got into East Berlin
(filthy with lignite brown coal soot -- USSR bureaucrats had cut back oil deliveries while Brezhnev ailed; slowly dooming the Soviet Block)
had a dinner in the French Zone Officers' Club ...
It is funny how some Americans think bearing arms it’s such an important human right.
@@markrossow6303
Yes indeed, that was a unique time and place.Allot happened there. Movies should be made of this time and place. Sadly, many in America today do not even know of this history.
The hostile and dangerous Inner German Border, and the Socialist Czechoslovak Border, Fulda Gap, Allied and Soviet Military Missions to both West and East Germany, Berlin, the Duty Train, Transit requirenents, the 1,KM Border Zone etc.
America had whole American cities. Self-sustaining American military communities in Germany. With our own Housing villages, Shopping Malls, McDonald's, Resturants, Car/ Motorcycle Dealerships, Supermarkets,Shoppetts, Rod& Gunclubs, Gas Staions, Elementary, Middle, Highschools, even Universities etc. All are memories for both you and me/ others!
@@valeok8357
Because we learn from our own and others' history!
As a 1st generation born American, I come from a mixed family of WW2 refugees. On my father's side, Estonian, in Estonia on the 17th of June 1940 the illegally invading sinister Russian Soviet gangster Army gave a Dictate to the Estonian government in its last days at the Estonian city of Narva. Known as the "Narva Dictate".
Where by the invading Russian Soviet gangster Army thuggishly intimidated, the Estonian government by dictating to the Estonian government to immediately ban and order a surrender, and confiscation within 48 hours of the sale, bartering possession, carrying of all privately owned firearms amongst the general population of Estonia.
Once most of the firearms were surrendered and confiscated from the Estonian people, the Communist Soviet Russian invaders along with Estonian traitorous collaborators started to massively terrorize the inhabitants of Estonia, by the illegal overthrow of the lawful Estonian government and, perpetrating multiple crimes against humanity, against the Estonian people such as; strong arm robbery, rape, assault,torture, murder,illegal arrests and deportations to Soviet Russian slave labor camps etc.
In our modern 21st century time, in the Ukraine, the sinister Neo Soviet Russian gangster invaders also have perpetrated many crimes against humanity, especially with the infamous Buca massacre. Which was easily perpetrated by the sinister Neo Soviet Russian gangster invaders because the Ukrainian population was generally forbidden to own Handguns.
Had Ukrainians been armed with handguns, they could have fought back and defended and preserved their valuable lives against the Neo Soviet Russian terrorist invaders.
I guess that the facts of history are just too much for you to understand!
My wife has an old passport from when she was a kid that has the DDR stamp when her family would visit family in West Germany. A law most don't realize also left over is making homeschool illegal. When I retired we wanted to settle in Germany vs. Poland but because we homeschooled in states and wanted to continue Poland was where we headed. Plus COL much lower. The tax law gets American military married to Germans as well. Whole international incident on that situation for years. Resolved recently.
Sweden lost the ability to homeschool when we joined the EU. I thought it would have been long before due to socialist reasons but it turns out it was only in 1995 when joining EU.
Sadly Germany and Belgium are the main ones that control EU. I have degrees in Political Science and took European studies here in Europe. EU was supposed to start off as a way for easier trade and movement of people. Some good aspects of EU but when it comes to forcing a nation to change who they are than in my opinion not a great thing. Here in Poland EU is against certain things and withheld money. Poland did not change for EU but got a new PM that might so EU released money. Than the coal. I am not for coal and switched my home I bought after moving from US to gas from coal. EU is holding money till Poland stops harvesting coal and been that way for years. Yet near my inlaws in Germany, Köln area, Germany shutdown towns and rerouted a highway within the lsst few years to get more coal out of an old mine. :( EU countries need to be on same page for some things but other things that are their national identity they should keep.
The worst thing about Ehegattensplitting is that the people with the highest income gap are usually the one who need some financial relief the least, because most couples can't afford to be a single income household anymore and couples that do that are mostly quite wealthy.
And couples where both partners work on minimum wage jobs who could use financial relief don't benefit from it at all.
This entire law is a disgrace and should be abolished and I say that as someone who is in the top 10% of Germans when it comes to salary and wages.
Abolish the law and use the extra taxes to help people who actually need financial support for fucks sake.
Ok this is weird, but I'm asking if you can help solve this mystery. I worked at the front desk in the Carlyle hotel in NYC. A friend worked for the Edison hotel in times square. He asked me to work a few weekends for him. This was like 1977-78. I'm German my father was in the kriegsmarine at 18. The manager of , and I was told hotel owner was admiral Carl Donitz. And it was, this was in the diamond district and most of the employees at the hotel were Jewish and they feared Donitz. It was funny, they tip toed around him. Now records say Donitz died in Germany in 1980. I'm not buying it. If you can find out anything about this , maybe a twin , something strange for sure.
Alot of Nazi's and Nazi sympathizers were believed to have fled to Argentina before the fall of Nazi Germany to the Allied powers, so it is possible. It's still questioned as to whether or not the body that was buried was actually the body of Adolf Hitler. They even exzumed the grave site finding that the remaining Skelton didn't match what is known bout the build of Hitler.
Wenn du´s nicht glaubst, dann ließ doch einfach bei WIKIPEDIA nach! Er verstarb tatsächlich 1980. Ich denke, man hielt das für funny, dem Kraut einen gehörigen Bären aufzubinden!
Im Übrigen bin ich der Meinung, dass Dönitz in seinem eigenen Hotel "ausgesuchte" Leute beschäftigt hätte!
I'm afraid you have been fed a lot of nonsense and misinformation. Karl Doenitz was head of German U-boat fleet in WW2. He never owned a hotel in NYC or any place else.
Funny story but unlikely that the fellow who managed the Carlyle was the bona fide Karl Dönitz. His death notice in 1980 in the
New York Times says he lived out his days in relative obscurity from his release in 1956 til death in the small town of Aumühle, just outside Hamburg. The owner of the Edison hotel from 1931 was Milton J Kramer, who died in 1977, around the time of your story. The new owner/manager was unlikely to have been old Uncle Karl who was across the pond, but I'm sure the new guy may have been his doppelgänger!
@@PanikStudios I wonder why everyone called him Mr Donitz, since those days with the "Hitler channel" and the Internet. I'm telling you, it was Donitz, unmistakable
Yeah... so they made laws that concern everyday life stuff. OK?
If they are good, keep them. Or vote for a party that will change them.
Most of the constitution has its origin in the Kaiserreich and 3rd Reich … illogic to believe they built new one from scratch. ‘They made laws concerning everyday life’ … odd comment … its a constitution … what do you think they had back then? They took the constitution and adapted it … as was done later after the war. You cannot vote a party to change something … the others must agree! Nothing that needs urgent changing as it works perfectly find … those using it are trained to do so. The Nazi terminology can clearly be spotted … they focus on the perpetrators … not the crime … refer to people with clearly criminal character. But they managed to appropriately apply.
When you turn on your VPN just leave it ON, it will not have any negative effects on your internet connection and keeping it live will let it pick up updates as soon as they are available. If you simply leave it ON you will never have to worry about forgetting to turn it on.
I appreciate that you are marking your advertisements. I know, we are obliged to do so here in Germany. But I dont think so in America. Am I right?
Das BGB ist im kern noch viel älter....
from 1900
And it is heavily influenced by the napoleonic code civil😂
Some of the animal welfare laws adopted at the time might still be in effect.
The whole constitution is based upon previous ones … was just adjusted … and improved … of course you find shitloads in there … the list is endless.
Good video Feli. I am curious about the differences in both criminal and civil processes. Given all that is happening in our courts it would be timely.
There are also some relicts of German Nazi law in Austria, for example church taxation law (the intention was to motivate people leaving the church) or the "Reichsgaragenordnung" from 1939 which still nowadays requires to build parking lots or a garage if you build a residential building (the motivation was to prepare for the KdF-Wagen later called Volkswagen)....
I have to make some corrections here.
Many of the laws in Germany were written way _before_ the Nazi regime, so not all laws more than 80 years old were introduced by the Nazi regime - even if also some of the laws more than 100 years old may be questionable.
The civil code (BGB = civil law book) was adopted in the year 1900; parts of it were suspended during WW II, but later reinstated, and there were a lot of amendments, but in the core it is still the same law. And many clauses are unchanged except maybe for a modernized word here or there.
The German penal code (Strafgesetzbuch = penal law book) was adopted in 1871 after the foundation of the Prussian-led German Empire. The Nazis changed parts of it and in particular "allowed" judges also to punish "crimes" not specified in the law (and also to not punish crimes committed by Nazis). Most of those changes were reverted afterwards (except e.g. the definition of murder) as well as some offences newly introduced, like "treason to peace" (preparing or inciting a war of aggression) and "incitement to hatred" (against ethnic, religious or social groups). Between 1945 and today many reforms of different parts of the code were made, regarding offences as well as penalties (like the abolishment of death sentences in West Germany in 1949), but the structure stays the same.
You didn't pay attention to what was said did you.... 😮
@@trance9158 I did, but I had written part of the comment before she even mentioned some of the things - and she did not mention explicitly that most of German civil law, trade low and penal law was written before WW I. The constitution was rewritten after WW I and again after WW II (but not after reunification), the laws however only adapted to the constitution (later also to EU rules). Many laws are far older than 80 years, exactly like in the US.
Its quite obvious that they did not rewrite anything from scratch … the Nazis just adjusted existing law as was done after WW2
May 1st, also known as "Workers' Day", was introduced as a public holiday by Hitler and is still valid today.
Intriguingly Soviet started theirs in 1917.
The first Chechoslovak Republic followed in 1918, as the first actual democracy to institute it on May 1st.
The American Labor Day, celebrated on the first Monday of September, has the same roots as everyone's Worker's Day except the Nazis; based on a day to celebrate workers (in fact Many May Day celebrations are just that language's way of saying Labor or Worker's Day). Labor Day became a national Holliday in Oregon in 1887 and was a federal holiday by 1894.
America is thus actually the inventor of having a Labor/Worker's Day.
Hitler did indeed originally call it "Feiertag der nationalen Arbeit" or "Holiday of national labor" in 1933 and it was celebrated exactly once in the 3rd Reich.
Because the National Socialistic German Labor party didn't have much actual socialism in their party at all, but rather was a right wing elitist "Us against Them" party, the labor message didn't actually fit with what they wanted. So February 27th of 1934 they changed the name to "Nationaler Feiertag des deutschen Volkes" or "National Holiday of the German People" .. the term labor or work completely removed. Remember: The Nazis had actual Socialists and Communists put in work camps or prisons, or had them executed.
In other words.. the modern Worker's or Labor Days has none of the same message in them that the Nazis put in their version, though there certainly must be Nazi wannabes out there trying to claim it is their day.
And they were cynical enough to pick May 2nd of 1933 to put an end to the still existing independent unions. After that, all 'workers organisations' were controlled and instrumentalized by the party leadership, not a self-organized representation of the workers' interests.
Your advertisement neglects to mention that, if you're on mobile device, changing location by VPN also incurs extra mobile data cost. I tried a VPN once and my phone bill went up by 20 €.
Thats complete nonsense … why should they say such thing … you should specify why you had extra charges! It usually does not cost a thing extra … in 8 years I did not pay a penny more … its simply down to common sense … it changes your ip to a different country … if you recklessly leave it on it affects everything you do online … if you have higher roaming charges and pretend to be in Africa whilst being in Munich it of course may affect your costs … normal calls are not affected … if you use voice over ip you call from Africa … thats the purpose of vpn … disguise your true location … its solely your responsibility … as it is your responsibility to check whether what you do will be legal … a car ad does not need to highlight that you need a driving license … a vpn ad does not need to warn you that your mobile pretends being abroad … and what this could mean for your contract … YOU must check and consider this!
We don't even have a written constitution here. Unless you count the Magna Carta of which only like 4 laws are still applicable.
Well, actually we do have a constitution with written and unwritten elements. And it's just not in a single document. The Bill of Rights 1688, The Claim of Right Act 1689, the Acts of Union 1707 and 1800, the Representation of the People Act 1928, the treaties that establish the United Nations and Council of Europe, and much more are all part of our constitution - and recognised as such by the Supreme Court. Very much more, too.
So none of the English Bill of Rights of 1689 is in effect?
Where is "here" ? You just expect random people on the internet to know which country you're in?
We have a constitutional prohibition for judges to test laws to the constitution. It is just for Dutch politicians to judge if they follow the cobstitution correctly.😂
@@hello-cn5nh Magna Carta is British. I learned about that in the USA in history class. I think some people forget this is a very international channel. Not everyone is of British decent or from a British Commonwealth so they don't learn about this law.