How To Legally Fly a Drone in a National Park? (YDQA Ep 50)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Welcome back to another episode of Your Drone Questions Answered! In this episode, John Dickow and David Young tackle the common misconception that drones can't be flown in national parks. David breaks down the legal pathway to flying drones in these protected areas, shedding light on the exceptions outlined in Policy Memorandum 14-05 issued by the United States Department of the Interior National Park Service.
    www.nps.gov/subjects/policy/u...
    Learn about the detailed process of obtaining a Special Park Uses Permit, the criteria park superintendents consider, and the essential conditions drone operators must adhere to for safe and legal operations within national parks. From FAA regulations to environmental considerations, David provides valuable insights for drone enthusiasts looking to fly responsibly in these scenic locations.
    If you've ever wondered about the possibility of flying drones in national parks, this episode is a must-watch! Have your own drone-related question? Send it over to ydqa.io or join the discussion in the Drone Launch Connect community.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 46

  • @CA_preacher
    @CA_preacher 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thanks for the heads up. Every superintendent is going to wonder why their phone is ringing off the hook this weekend. But this is good stuff to know. Appreciate your research on this.

  • @n3d.studio
    @n3d.studio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    There's an over abundance of rules on flying drones. I have a mini 3 pro and really that is all you need. The worst that could happen is it could fall on someone. It is light and small. This country needs to lighten up on all the rules and regulations. I'm thinking about buying and training a falcon and just fitting it with a small camera. No regulations for that, just a bird flying around, are they going to ban birds?

  • @Emuspaul
    @Emuspaul 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Drones do no harm other than loud motorcycles, gas-guzzling RV's and tour buses, hunters, fishermen, etc. National Parks are for citizens who naturally want to do harmless photography, and a drone is just a camera with a different perspective. We must fight back against the ignorant, prejudiced drone haters who advocate banning drones because it is no skin off their backs.

    • @DroneLaunchAcademy
      @DroneLaunchAcademy  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree that it seems like a bit of an overreach.

    • @swoopix-hovernh
      @swoopix-hovernh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All this so they can preserve tourism?.... Won't be breaking any regs but imo.... Way too much bureaucratic BS!

    • @alansach8437
      @alansach8437 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If I'm out hiking in the beautiful wilderness of a National Park, the very last thing I want is a damn drone buzzing around overhead. They also disturb wildlife. Try leaving your tech at home for once. I guarantee you will enjoy nature far more.

    • @Emuspaul
      @Emuspaul 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alansach8437 Drone batteries last only about 20 minutes. What makes you such an entitled killjoy? Sure it is illegal to harass wildlife. But it is not a gun! I use low-noise propellers, and you really can’t hear the drone at 400 feet.

    • @TommyMacTube
      @TommyMacTube 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree except hunters and fishermen. That’s keeping ancient skills alive and people that don’t want poisonous food that our government approves.

  • @WaterfallWhispering
    @WaterfallWhispering 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the PNW there is also a 25$ permit fee that is non refundable

  • @Drones_Eye_View
    @Drones_Eye_View 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the info. I do believe you can fly in a National Forest, within some boundaries like not near a road etc.

    • @geezerpleasers_OG
      @geezerpleasers_OG 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Also, you can't fly in Congressionally-designated Wilderness Areas, so check whether those exist within the National Forest you're interested in.

    • @Drones_Eye_View
      @Drones_Eye_View 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Both not flying at a NP or WA is really a dumb rule. That can be some of the best locations to get video. And my drone at 150' is quiet. A plane at a mile up sounds louder and is more disruptive.@@geezerpleasers_OG

    • @alansach8437
      @alansach8437 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No! No! No! It is illegal, and should be, to fly a drone inside a National Park! National Parks are for protecting and enjoying the resource. No one wants a drone buzzing around overhead when they are out enjoying nature. They also disturb wildlife. I have witnessed this first hand. They can also malfunction and crash in sensitive areas, where it may be harmful or dangerous to retrieve them in! God! Can't we have anyplace where we can escape technology anymore! The parks are about enjoying nature!

  • @nightlightabcd
    @nightlightabcd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Then there's the FAA that is obviously restricting drone video on TH-cam unless one pays the FAA shakedown for the two hour test just to post ones road trip or vacation video on TH-cam or ones own website, being that if TH-cam were to monetize the video, and the FAA sees it, then that could be a problem. I'm thinking this must be quite a profitable operation for the FAA!

  • @DaleF-tv6om
    @DaleF-tv6om 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    OK, So then where can a vacationer novice actually enjoy flying a drone and get great footage in the USA? Not only is DJI as a whole on the chopping block, but flying a drone (Even with a Part 107 certificate) is becoming severely and exponentially increased seemingly on a monthly basis.

    • @arklave
      @arklave 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For the first part of your inquiry, I would suggest using an app like autopylot to search for areas of interest. Here in Michigan I can fly legally over the vast majority of the state. I'm sure the opportunity for good footage would be accessible most anywhere you go, especially in the upper peninsula.
      But id also like to touch on this proposed "DJI ban" that has been rearing its head for years now. The chances of this current version of the bill passing into law is incredibly unlikely.
      1) It only names DJI but is aimed at the chinese drone industry. If the threat from China is as real as they make it out to be, they would ban ALL chinese made drones, which the bill does not do. This is clearly aimed at artificially eliminating competition from the industry. The industry will fail or fall behind if innovation is not leading the free market.
      2) DJI has something like 70% of the entire market world wide. Logistically and economically speaking, there is no alternative for the market to fall back on. Even the biggest US drone manufacturer quit making consumer drones to focus on business and enterprise work.
      3) At this point any sort of accusation of data sharing and critical infrastructure compromising is purely SPECULATION. Despite all the noise around security concerns there has yet to be a SINGLE shred of evidence to support this notion. Absolutely nothing has been discovered to back up any of these claims since they have manifested. If they really want a nationwide ban it cannot be founded on speculation so until they actually back up any of their claims they have no legs to stand on.
      4) Have you read into the bill at all? At one point they claim DJI drones can measure a persons body temperature and even detect human heart beats. Anyone who owns a DJI drone knows that's wildly outlandish. Like lawmakers in general from a top down perspective, they haven't the slightest clue what they are talking about.
      Putting the consumer drone market aside, there is a surging industry to provide drones to farmers, fire fighters and law enforcement. Firefighters would rather send a drone into burning buildings to search around instead of people risking their lives for example. Drones are literally being used to save lives in certain scenarios so there would need to be compelling evidence to initiate a ban and the burden of proof on this is currently insurmountable.

    • @DroneLaunchAcademy
      @DroneLaunchAcademy  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apparently not national parks unless you want to do a lot of paperwork

  • @geezerpleasers_OG
    @geezerpleasers_OG 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fun, and only distantly related fact: It's even illegal to fly a kite in some national parks. You can't play a kite anywhere in Grand Canyon National Park, for example. My little grand niece is a potential desperado if she ever tries to fly her beloved Unicorn Kite in the wrong place.

  • @grampafpv
    @grampafpv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Can't fly a drone but can rock through a national park with an ear blasting motorcycle. Stupid arbitrary rules meant to control and gatekeep.

    • @MrDecessus
      @MrDecessus 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Bad laws like always. Land of the free may ass.

  • @srlewis29
    @srlewis29 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Or you take off and land out side the perimeter of the park.

    • @johnrose5229
      @johnrose5229 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No not how that works

    • @poppianejo3856
      @poppianejo3856 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@johnrose5229It is a grey area, but the statement is technically correct. The national Park does not control the airspace above it. It only controls the ground, so the statement of launch and recover outside is correct…but then you bring in line of sight.

  • @DifferentPerspectivePhoto
    @DifferentPerspectivePhoto 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Or you can just launch from the edge of the parks border and fly over the park property and come back and land at the place you launched from off their property but on their border

    • @DroneLaunchAcademy
      @DroneLaunchAcademy  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very true! It’s just that often times the places people want to fly aren’t accessible range-wise from outside of the property boundaries

    • @flyinghorsedrone5376
      @flyinghorsedrone5376 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would assume the same thing buuuuut, not quite. While the concept you mention might be applied to other areas like local parks, this is different. Check www.nps.gov/articles/mitigating-the-impacts-of-aviation.htm and www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_91-36D.pdf. This is where what this video addresses how to fly legally. If you went up in a Cessna with a camera you would not be able to fly any lower that 2,000 ft AGL without NPS permission.

  • @allysoncheynes1216
    @allysoncheynes1216 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All NPS superintendents will tell you NO if you are simply a recreational pilot asking to simply take pretty pictures. I've been flying multirotors since before 2010 and have flown at many NPs before the universal ban was put into place. Now, they are constantly catching people with drones in the parks and every time that happens, they harden their resistance to our recreational flying. It's the yahoos who don't care about the rules and just go for it that are keeping these bans in place.

  • @philwachocki7958
    @philwachocki7958 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My first query is why?
    I have some footage from drone flights and have even been approved to fly between the airport and freeway. By phone. What are federal parks hiding??? As a rec pilot I don't know my destination down to. Small area. It is what I see when I get there

  • @markslayton5042
    @markslayton5042 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why is the rabble, trying to enjoy their UAV, in the National Parks THAT THEY PAY FOR, be of any less importance than some scientific endeavor, etc..? This is absurd. I flew in Yellowstone, after stopping by a ranger station and asking permission. They said, “Sure, just don’t fly directly over the geysers.” That was it. A crowd gathered around me while I was flying, and clapped when I landed. (Flying a giant homebuilt hexcopter.) It was a great time. Everyone seemed to really enjoy it. (Kids were watching the ground station monitor.) Again, this is all absurd.

    • @DroneLaunchAcademy
      @DroneLaunchAcademy  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad to know they let you fly! How recent was this? Yeah we’re not saying it’s a great system. Just reporting 🫡

  • @felixruiz2838
    @felixruiz2838 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why go through all these hoops fly it like u stole it. I have personally seen people flying ( taking off and landing) within the park! Rangers didn't care ! Just like the FAA they don't have enough people.

    • @ugpfpv361
      @ugpfpv361 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I've also seen park rangers that do care and threaten to take a drone.

    • @felixruiz2838
      @felixruiz2838 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ugpfpv361 not in New Jersey

    • @n3d.studio
      @n3d.studio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yeah, I've seen it too, they told the park rangers they were going to use it and did. nothing happened, this was in 2023.

    • @ugpfpv361
      @ugpfpv361 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@n3d.studio yeah guess you can claim ignorance, but there's also the chance of getting kick out if they want.

    • @n3d.studio
      @n3d.studio หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ugpfpv361 no they told the ranger they were going to fly it before hand and then did. They were native American decent and when I asked him if he knew about the rules that's when we told me he let them know. And that it was their land anyway. Lol. I feel like that applies to all of us humans though.

  • @Hopelesswanderer81
    @Hopelesswanderer81 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I do love the amount of EV bicycles in National parks now. Like we forgot to peddle. Yet you know EV drones are the DEVIL 🤣 home of the free

    • @omullis
      @omullis 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thanks for the irrelevant comment.

    • @Hopelesswanderer81
      @Hopelesswanderer81 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@omullis Hurting feelings A 🤣