Many thanks for all your lessons! I want to start learning VFX. But I haven't looked at how much, in my opinion, the dynamics of destruction in TP turns out to be better. You, as a person with extensive experience in 3ds max, what can you tell me to study? Where would You start now?
Master Footage from the important perspective of understanding computer animation, Houdini is the best idea. You'll spend a lot of time learning, but you will gain the skills to solve any problem. That is if you want to be really serious about it. If it's a side project - TP along with FumeFX etc is the second best option :)
@@HristoVelev Thank you very much for your response! Tyflow looks promising in the long run, but you can't get a deeper drop - there is a ceiling. Edwin is a tough guy, but unfortunately in TP, in addition to destruction, other tasks are harder to do, or even impossible. Flip solver has been sawing for years, but I don't think it was used anywhere in production. More and more high-class professionals are switching to Houdini's side, and there are probably reasons for this)
nooon Man... i had this ideas of rename the constraint type, but i lost in my mind... and after whatch this video i remember to try, and works . i did dis inside a sop solver inside a dop network because my constraint connection are build over time, and not before the simulation, so my problem is to remove constraint based on some mask attribute over the attach mesh. i read this value and if i remove the constraint all the sim go crazy. BUT if i rename the type to "none", instead of remove prim, all works great. PRIMITIVE WRANGLE INSIDE THE SOP SOLVER // in the 3 input of the wrangle i connect the obj merge of the geo with the remove animated attribute // Read the near point of 3 input int nearpt= nearpoint(2,v@P); // Read the near point value remove from the geometry int remove = point(2,"remove",nearpt); if(remove>0){
//@Cd={1,0,0}; //Set the type from attach to none >> so the attach constraint is removed s@type= "none"; } I have another way of do this , by Vellum Constraint Property and activate the Remove checkbox and Vex (in this case the removed constraint dont cause problems) int nearpt= nearpoint(2,v@P); remove=point(2,"remove", nearpt); thanks again
![เจ้าผู้เดียว - ดิด คิตตี้ [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/q0NLCYKBOTo/mqdefault.jpg)
![NONT TANONT - ดอกไม้ที่รอฝน (spring) - Reimagined [Live Session]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nY2PsFZFEOg/mqdefault.jpg)
This video open my mind on a wide variety of techniques thank you very much Mr Velev.
Thanks a lot for taking time to create this video. 😊
Learned so much from this tutorial, thank you so much! Take care:)
Thank You very much, Hristo!
Great, Hristo, thanks for share!
Thanks for this! :) Awesome!
You have very nice channel. Keep adding nice cool video please
thanks
Many thanks for all your lessons! I want to start learning VFX. But I haven't looked at how much, in my opinion, the dynamics of destruction in TP turns out to be better. You, as a person with extensive experience in 3ds max, what can you tell me to study? Where would You start now?
Master Footage from the important perspective of understanding computer animation, Houdini is the best idea. You'll spend a lot of time learning, but you will gain the skills to solve any problem. That is if you want to be really serious about it. If it's a side project - TP along with FumeFX etc is the second best option :)
@@HristoVelev Thank you very much for your response! Tyflow looks promising in the long run, but you can't get a deeper drop - there is a ceiling. Edwin is a tough guy, but unfortunately in TP, in addition to destruction, other tasks are harder to do, or even impossible. Flip solver has been sawing for years, but I don't think it was used anywhere in production. More and more high-class professionals are switching to Houdini's side, and there are probably reasons for this)
Master Footage go with Houdini :)
What's going on in the background with all the shouting? Angry Blender artists coming for you Hristo? :D
Heh most likely 😀
nooon Man... i had this ideas of rename the constraint type, but i lost in my mind... and after whatch this video i remember to try, and works .
i did dis inside a sop solver inside a dop network because my constraint connection are build over time, and not before the simulation, so my problem is to remove constraint based on some mask attribute over the attach mesh. i read this value and if i remove the constraint all the sim go crazy. BUT if i rename the type to "none", instead of remove prim, all works great.
PRIMITIVE WRANGLE INSIDE THE SOP SOLVER
// in the 3 input of the wrangle i connect the obj merge of the geo with the remove animated attribute
// Read the near point of 3 input
int nearpt= nearpoint(2,v@P);
// Read the near point value remove from the geometry
int remove = point(2,"remove",nearpt);
if(remove>0){
//@Cd={1,0,0};
//Set the type from attach to none >> so the attach constraint is removed
s@type= "none";
}
I have another way of do this , by Vellum Constraint Property and activate the Remove checkbox and Vex (in this case the removed constraint dont cause problems)
int nearpt= nearpoint(2,v@P);
remove=point(2,"remove", nearpt);
thanks again
wa, hello hristo i wanna ask you something are you still have exotic matter naiad software ??
Thank you. could you share the hip please ?
www.dropbox.com/s/axwzrnhasta7bqb/vellum_constraint_dissolve_sop.hipnc?dl=0
@@HristoVelev Thank man !
dont work in h18.5. pls provide the scene