having found no other mention of this on TH-cam it makes me think that this is not so popular. I can also see there's not many replies from the teacher he's has good Showmanship and he is trying to sell us the idea that Rivet is very powerful tool but in reality I get get the impression that this is more Quagmire.
These are workarounds, but Marcello is good at promoting exciting new ways to use the software. I like the enthusiasm too. I wonder if creating rotated elements without using reference planes and the accompanying angular dimensions would impede creating usable construction documents for those items? That would defeat part of the purpose of using Revit. But, it definitely makes it easier to construct animated moving parts in the software. Currently available Revit construction equipment boom families use these ideas. I naturally wonder who developed the ideas first? I guess everybody borrows from others to some degree.
is there any more screencast of this subject "Families in Motion" on TH-cam? I would like to go more into detail on the first part of this video starting at around 7:40 timeline
Marcelo can the revolve trick (the one you used for the revolving door) work with nested families as well? Say the revolving door panel was a nested family. Thanks!
Great question, Nichlas. Explore AU on the web for more free resources, including this great session: www.autodesk.com/autodesk-university/class/Families-Motion-New-and-Exciting-Methods-Make-Your-Revit-Families-Move-2015
Its was so amazing class you have conducted on motion and its great teaching of yours Sir you have made everything so simple.
having found no other mention of this on TH-cam it makes me think that this is not so popular.
I can also see there's not many replies from the teacher he's has good Showmanship and he is trying to sell us the idea that Rivet is very powerful tool but in reality I get get the impression that this is more Quagmire.
Love you man...the way to teach is absolutely good....
These are workarounds, but Marcello is good at promoting exciting new ways to use the software. I like the enthusiasm too. I wonder if creating rotated elements without using reference planes and the accompanying angular dimensions would impede creating usable construction documents for those items? That would defeat part of the purpose of using Revit. But, it definitely makes it easier to construct animated moving parts in the software. Currently available Revit construction equipment boom families use these ideas. I naturally wonder who developed the ideas first? I guess everybody borrows from others to some degree.
Mind is blown.. so awesome thank you :)
How cool this video. I love you Marcello!
I'm waiting for your next course
is there any more screencast of this subject "Families in Motion" on TH-cam?
I would like to go more into detail on the first part of this video starting at around 7:40 timeline
Everything feels like workaround with autodesk. "Ridiculously simply" seems to be euphemism for "obscure workaround".
Very excellent job
Marcelo can the revolve trick (the one you used for the revolving door) work with nested families as well? Say the revolving door panel was a nested family. Thanks!
I think he is nesting the boom to revolve surface in the video as well, so i think yes you can.
"don't create family if you don't know the work plan(e)" solid life advice here lol
what is that handout called at 27:34?
Hey
I know it is a old video. :)
But, do anyone know where i can get those families? Or familys like it?? :)
Great question, Nichlas. Explore AU on the web for more free resources, including this great session: www.autodesk.com/autodesk-university/class/Families-Motion-New-and-Exciting-Methods-Make-Your-Revit-Families-Move-2015
very nice
cool
feel natural it's because is basic trigonometry. this is not innovation at all.