Great choice, you will love the way the Macan drives! This being the Diesel S model averages easily 7,5-8 l/100km (so around 13kms per liter) on combined use, it is a very fuel efficient engine. Petrol engines drink a bit more fuel: I tested the 2,0L petrol engine and it averages around 10 L/100km, and for what I know the V6 Macan S petrol shouldn't be that different.
@@tommiforna Thanks for the reply! That’s honestly great, 8% combined is what my old 2.2 E Class used to drink, and the performance was fairly absent, haha. Honestly with these highly and quickly increasing gas prices I’ll probably go with the diesel, although I bet the petrol one feels like a genuine Porsche.
@@leomodo9318 Yeah I have to say I was pleasantly surprised of the fuel economy in the Diesel, especially considering the amount of performance it has! I think it perfectly suits the car if it is intended to be used as an all-rounder: plenty of torque and, together with the PDK gearbox and the rear-biased 4WD, makes it amazingly good to drive for a SUV. I guess the 3,0 V6 Petrol (Macan S) is the right engine to have but (in Italy) it's quite expensive to run considering fuel prices and car tax. The 2.0 petrol ("base" Macan) is quite aggressive and overall a very good engine (considering it is 4-cylinder) but in my opinion lacks torque and its not powerful enough to give you the proper "Porsche" feeling (and it drinks the same as the V6 petrol).
Yes, 100% stock! This v6 makes a really good sporty sound for being a diesel, especially in “Sport” mode where a sound “booster” is activated and the sound is even deeper
Awesome car. I plan on getting mine soon, coming from a 2018 Volvo XC60.
What was the fuel economy during the test drive?
Great choice, you will love the way the Macan drives! This being the Diesel S model averages easily 7,5-8 l/100km (so around 13kms per liter) on combined use, it is a very fuel efficient engine. Petrol engines drink a bit more fuel: I tested the 2,0L petrol engine and it averages around 10 L/100km, and for what I know the V6 Macan S petrol shouldn't be that different.
@@tommiforna Thanks for the reply! That’s honestly great, 8% combined is what my old 2.2 E Class used to drink, and the performance was fairly absent, haha.
Honestly with these highly and quickly increasing gas prices I’ll probably go with the diesel, although I bet the petrol one feels like a genuine Porsche.
@@leomodo9318 Yeah I have to say I was pleasantly surprised of the fuel economy in the Diesel, especially considering the amount of performance it has! I think it perfectly suits the car if it is intended to be used as an all-rounder: plenty of torque and, together with the PDK gearbox and the rear-biased 4WD, makes it amazingly good to drive for a SUV. I guess the 3,0 V6 Petrol (Macan S) is the right engine to have but (in Italy) it's quite expensive to run considering fuel prices and car tax.
The 2.0 petrol ("base" Macan) is quite aggressive and overall a very good engine (considering it is 4-cylinder) but in my opinion lacks torque and its not powerful enough to give you the proper "Porsche" feeling (and it drinks the same as the V6 petrol).
Yes that is surprisingly good! I wasn’t expecting it to be such an efficient car with those performances
Stock car? This sound is amazing for a diesel !
Yes, 100% stock! This v6 makes a really good sporty sound for being a diesel, especially in “Sport” mode where a sound “booster” is activated and the sound is even deeper