Fun fact: in the original novel (yes, there was a book before the first cartoon film, it was written by Dodie Smith in the 1950s), it was very clearly established that Cruella's birth name was, in fact, Cruella De Vil, and that she came from a long line of De Vils. Heck, Mrs. Dearly went to school with her.
How to make a dog killer sympathetic, according to Disney: 1: Dalmatians killed her mother 2: She doesn't kill dogs in this movie 3: She doesn't even dislike dogs 4: Actually just make her a different character altogether Nice one, guys. Another slam dunk.
I fail to see the problem with that. That is the point of this movie just like it was in maleficent. Retelling the story and changing it in order to elaborate on the villan now protagonist.
well, I guess we are suppose to think of it like an alternative universe kindda thing, This Cruella is totally not the 101 Cruella (it even end with she owning some dalmatians) so if your kids ask "Why Cruella is so mean in the other movie" you can just tell them they are not the same person lol
@@Psy_Ro but it didn’t? It just kicked the inexplicably evil villain trope up to Emma Thompson, and the plucky underdog trope to Emma Stone. Then fiddled with names and continuity. Its the same story. Its literally a way to use a recognizable IP for the box office, without actually using it meaningfully in the story,
@@emilyfarley1525 You should! It's super entertaining. The hate comments are mostly from people jumping on the hate wagon without having even seen the movie.
Throughout the whole movie I was like "okay Disney we get it. You can afford to play and have the rights to all 30 of these very popular 60/70s songs, playing every 6 damn minutes" lmaooo
I mean, it *does* make for fun character dynamics... Watching your main character abuse a decent portion of the cast without any other dynamics to spice things up can get boring pretty quickly, and minions are a good way to get that.
@@rodrigoestebanmartinezardi6661 Yeah i thought the same too lol I was curious on how she was going to treat them since she treated them so nasty in the original cartoon. I’m glad they showed her acting mean for only a portion since it wouldn’t have made any sense for her to the whole time.
"Just make a new movie, we promise we'll see it... Maybe..." *looks at A Wrinkle in Time box office* I guess that means another ten live-action cartoons
At least Cruella didn't have to deal with the humiliation of being defeated by demonic furniture and having her love fall for a buffalo monster *in a cape* .
@@sbsnate2312 It's Dalmatians drop kicking someone off a terrace from the director of "I, Tonya", the Tonya Harding biopic, and one of the writers of "The Favourite". That scene was meant to be hilarious.
“Alright, we need to release a new movie before people get bored. Ideas?” “How about one where we try to get the audience to sympathize with a slightly insane dog murderer?” “Fucking brilliant, Jim.
This is just paving the way for the mother of all "lets explain the villan" projects, the movie about little adolf and how he dealt with being rejected from art school.
Actually, there have been books about Adolf Hitler's youth, based on the few remaining accounts people still had from that time. Difference: While they paint a humanizing picture, it's not exactly flattering... unlike this freaking movie -.-
Are you seriously comparing this movie's Cruella to hitler? Actually, why does every damn comment section on TH-cam innevitably ends up making a reference to Hitler?!
@@gabrielleroux2333 you're absolutely correct! They assume that men or black people care more about humans than dogs -.- disgusting to accuse people of such a thing!
These remakes are an excuse to renew the copyright for old movies that would otherwise pass into the public domain and no one can convince me otherwise
You just blew my mind! I totally forgot about the copyright renewals! I swear, Disney will do anything to prevent its properties from falling into public domain.
I was watching a video about the film, and someone in the comments section wrote: "So, this movie would have been much better if they had removed the name Cruella from it."
I said the same thing myself about Joker. That movie could have been an interesting psychological drama had they not tied it into an established IP. I'm a huge Batman fan and could barely make it through due to the numerous connections (looking at you Thomas Wayne). Unfortunately it made over a billion dollars, so here comes Disney with theirs's. End Rant
@@fancydragon2160 Yeah but the big difference is that The Joker movie actually connects well with the universe DC has, while this one goes against everything established in the original
@@leonardovenancio6096 Yeah but Joker was meant to tie in, while Cruella is a retcon franchise, the same way Maleficent is. It isn't like this movie makes 101 Dalmatians not make sense, they are two different franchises.
Emma Thompson's character is the one that should supposed to be Cruella, minus the not killing dogs part. Cunning. Evil. Not redeemable. Throughout the movie I keep thinking she's supposed to be Cruella lmao.
@@kohlcooke8789 it’s okay Kohl don’t worry I too was an edgy tween that thought I had to validate people’s comments on the comment section of a video that is publicly viewed
Honestly, I really like the Cruella film. It was enjoyable and one of my favorites. That is if you detach it from the original movie. Don't get me wrong, 101 Dalmatians is a classic. But Cruella deVil is not a character that should be redeemed. The character in the movie felt entirely different from the puppy skinner in the original movie. It doesn't give cruella any reason to hurt Dalmatians and I feel sorry that Estelle had to turn into Cruella because it makes the film seem so much sillier. It tries to redeem Cruella, but it comes up with the most basic way of doing it. If Cruella had a differently named protagonist, who turned into a different character, it could have turned out so much better than what it is. Because being connected to the original makes the plot kind of fall apart.
You know… if this movie just chose to be its own movie, like just a movie about a fashionista fight that wasn’t Cruella Devil, but was it’s own character… it could’ve been a fine movie. Heck, a good one. Why do we need to make these dumb origin films? Just make new stories! Please!
I think it’s a case of rewriting what we think of villains to make them sympathetic characters. Not sure exactly why that’s a thing but I’m am certain it’s a psychological game.
yeah Cruella really was such close friends with Horae and Jasper : 3 that's why in the original film she yelled at them, berated them and treated them like garbage, right?
Yes. None of this, oh they're a complex character with a troubled past, everyone's a special snowflake, crap. Batman proved that sometimes the best villains are the ones who just want to watch the world burn.
Yes. Yes! YES! Most Guy Ritchie movies = various London gangsters pithily try to acquire the same thing for 2 hours (antique rifles, diamond, painting, etc). Hilarity ensues.
@@luigifan001 Well, not everything appeals to everyone’s taste. To me, and many others, a film can’t be a worthwhile film if the whole focus is fashion with no interest for characters, story, or other basics of a movie. Edit: I don’t believe that a plot can consist of only fashion, and be interesting to me. Some others might believe that it could be interesting.
@@stefanfilipovits21 yeeesss, when I first saw the trailer, I didn't mind, but when I saw that Mark was in it, my mind completely changed. I love Emma Thompson, but Mark made me see the movie
Does every villain need a cliched, "sympathetic" origin story? Like, they took Maleficent- the only Disney villain so evil she summoned the "demons of Hell" - and made her wishy washy while pissing all over the good fairies (the main heroes of the original). Now they've done the same thing with Cruella... stop. Just stop.
Does very villain need a cliched "I'm just evil" story? Because Disney just had to do twist villain Hans and Elsa's Evil Grandfather... They should stop with that too.
I mean this comment makes no sense. Cz Maleficent was not exactly a villian in the movie. You are mixing the character from the book and the movie. The character in the movie is completely different. She is more of an anti-Hero than a villian while in the books or the fairly tales, she was a complete villian.
@@DrDiabolical000 I am not mixing up the book and the movie. I am comparing the original animated Disney classic film with the live action film. In the original animated movie, Maleficent was a baby killing villain. She did not have a single sympathetic element to her character- and that was what made her great! The live action version completely changed what was once one of Disney's most fearsome villains, while vilifying most of the heroes. It's frustrating for fans of the classic Disney films.
I like that one, but prefer what they went with since it feels more original. The movie has been getting compared to Devil Wears Prada since the trailer so it’s fitting but feels more obvious
@@spiderpunk94 What do you mean pre? Disney has always rereleased old films, but they just starting turning them into live action because it makes more money.
I’d totally watch a HT for OUAT. They included Chernabog on that show! I loved it. Eventually it just became “Disney characters: The Series” but there’d be a lot for HT to talk about.
1:19 She’s definitely lucky to receive a Dalmatian for free. Irl, they’re so expensive that I’ve never seen one in person. They’re also very high maintenance
@@richfictionfighter Yeah but they’re obviously prepping her for the original movie. They introduce the car, her name, then her two henchmen and at the end the two Dalmatians from the original movie being delivered to the original characters. If they wanted it to not be the origin story they should have made it clear in the movie, even just a line on how she doesn’t want real fur would do it.
I just want a documentary about the fashion in the movie, tell me about the designers, coming up with the themes, specific style choices to reflect character etc
Good catch about smoking in the 70s. I was in Milk. (Shook hands with Sean Penn, in fact!) The bg acting hotline warned us "smoking is a sign of the times." Said they were required to accommodate an employee with an allergy if one complained, but made this common sense plea implying you might want to rethink being in the movie if you can't be around smokers. :-P
I actually loved this movie. The actors were great, 70s/60s costumes/sets were cool, and it had a great plot that kept me interested the whole way. The combination of heist film, followed by Revenge plot, was great. I hadn't thought about the incest between Pongo and Perdita though, eh, I'm going to ignore that.
Because dalmatians killed her mom. Sounds stupid? It's actually her real mom that ordered the dogs to kill. *Now who's stupid?* *They're low key roasting everyone who assumed the scene would make her hate dalmatians🤣*
In all honesty, I'd rather have reimaginations of old characters instead of the even more uninspired and boring live action remakes disney pumped out the last few years.
@@inacatt oh yeah absolutely, me too. I'm just saying that if I had to choose between the content they've been putting out the past few years, I definitely prefer this more because at least it's not a completely boring real life rendition of a great animated movie
Not naming this movie "De Vill wears Prada" was a lost opportunity
Yeah, I'm surprised Screen Junkies didn't make fun of strong Miranda Priestley vibes.
It's all but certainly one of the rejected titles.
I mean, it was right there.
“De Vill wears Panda”?
But at least they used the butchered Invincible meme, right?
Oh yeah they totally could've go with that one
Fun fact: in the original novel (yes, there was a book before the first cartoon film, it was written by Dodie Smith in the 1950s), it was very clearly established that Cruella's birth name was, in fact, Cruella De Vil, and that she came from a long line of De Vils. Heck, Mrs. Dearly went to school with her.
The book is fricken weird and I love it
Dearly? I thought their name was Darling?
i guess they wanted to change it up
Anita Darling Is also a childhood friend of Estella, they didn't change that part all that much
Also her ancestor is a serial killer son of Satan
Right?
I didn't read the book, I watched the Film Theory about it...
"Catwoman on laundry day"
Screen Junkies never disappoint in roasting deserving movies
na bro we are living the same life, why are you everywhere?
@@michaelc822 Don't question it. You get used to it eventually. 😁
deserving?
When both Emma's work in the same movie but with different characters.
Screen Junkies roast EVERY movie, even the epic ones.
And this one is pretty awesome.
"How Estella Got Her Cruel Back."
Now that should have been the title of this film.
Another reminder why I shouldn't read the comments🙄
That was genius
Bitten by a radioactive dalmation. I mean, Disney bought Marvel so it ain't copyright, right?
The devil wears dalmatian.
What about "The Devil Wears Spots"?
How to make a dog killer sympathetic, according to Disney:
1: Dalmatians killed her mother
2: She doesn't kill dogs in this movie
3: She doesn't even dislike dogs
4: Actually just make her a different character altogether
Nice one, guys. Another slam dunk.
I fail to see the problem with that.
That is the point of this movie just like it was in maleficent. Retelling the story and changing it in order to elaborate on the villan now protagonist.
@@Psy_Ro you must have liked that 'cats' movie
@@jeremywoods770 never watched it.
But i do wanna see the musical
well, I guess we are suppose to think of it like an alternative universe kindda thing,
This Cruella is totally not the 101 Cruella (it even end with she owning some dalmatians)
so if your kids ask "Why Cruella is so mean in the other movie"
you can just tell them they are not the same person lol
@@Psy_Ro but it didn’t? It just kicked the inexplicably evil villain trope up to Emma Thompson, and the plucky underdog trope to Emma Stone. Then fiddled with names and continuity. Its the same story. Its literally a way to use a recognizable IP for the box office, without actually using it meaningfully in the story,
"It's a good thing Emma Stone picked a random car on London street with the wheel on the proper American side.
" 😂🤣
Yaaaaaasss I didn't notice
Just 1 more reason I'll never watch this lol
I feel like earlier in the movie it was the right side of the car though. I could be remembering wrong
@@darthnews it was actually pretty good
Awkward 😂
"An elaborate excuse for two fashonistas to dress-fight each other."
*Yes, I am in*
Can Disney rip off Kill La Kill?
@@thatjeff7550 They already ripped of Kimba the White Lion so I don't see why not 😂
That's the only thing I've heard that made me actually want to watch it.
Sounds legit.
@@emilyfarley1525 You should! It's super entertaining. The hate comments are mostly from people jumping on the hate wagon without having even seen the movie.
"Where the costumes do most the character work."
Jeez, you fricken killed her.
JG Hertzler said that about playing Klingons some years ago in an interview :D
dang it man!!! lol
I actually kinda thought it wasn't too bad... much better than I thought it would be at least. Plus they spent a fortune on the music
I think Emma Stone has actually admitted the same thing. She said her costumes did half of the work. Something along those words.
The costumes ARE amazing tho.
I havent seen so much love put into dresses since The Phantom Thread.
people were already joking “dalmatians probably killed her parents lmao”
Throughout the whole movie I was like "okay Disney we get it. You can afford to play and have the rights to all 30 of these very popular 60/70s songs, playing every 6 damn minutes" lmaooo
I thought the same fucking thing!
The lazy way of establishing a setting like having _Fortunate Son_ or _Run Through the Jungle_ in a Vietnam War movie.
'I get it disney. You can afford literally anything you want. You bought the whole damn world.
Except for the Led Zeppelin and Beatles/ Aerosmith versions. They decided to go with the versions by Tina and her wife beating alcoholic husband.
Wtf would you watch this
Turning henchman into a hench family in villain prequel is a must have now XD
especially if it contradicts their treatment of each other in the original film!
Turning henchmen into a hench family in a villain prequel is TIGHT!
I mean, it *does* make for fun character dynamics...
Watching your main character abuse a decent portion of the cast without any other dynamics to spice things up can get boring pretty quickly, and minions are a good way to get that.
And I love it.
Villains acting like a family is a weirdly nice change of pace.
@@rodrigoestebanmartinezardi6661 Yeah i thought the same too lol I was curious on how she was going to treat them since she treated them so nasty in the original cartoon. I’m glad they showed her acting mean for only a portion since it wouldn’t have made any sense for her to the whole time.
Cruella was a cartoon villain, who's fun because she's over-the-top evil for no reason. The last thing she needs is a sympathetic origin story.
Exactly.
Like...Maleficent, right? 😛 it’s too late man, we’ve lost them all to redemption arcs
@@athensk.4720 If Cruella is successful enough, they might make a prequel showing the sympathetic origin story of the Baroness.
@@Aqquila89
They already greenlit a sequel.
@@Aqquila89 fck, please no.
Disney could probably finance revolutions or start their own space program just with the money they must’ve spent licensing music in this movie
Well, they already helped finance the stealing of a Presidential Election in the USA, so it's just a matter of time at this point.
Good idea. Maybe it will give them something better to do films on instead of rehashing the same old stuff.
It was probably the only thing that could save the movie
@@___David__ What are you on about?
@@___David__ Oh jeez...another QAnon weirdo spreading his BS in the comment section of something totally unrelated... :|
This isn’t even Cruella.
This is just a weird crossover of the Devil wears Prada, and Joker.
You just described Cruella from the original, go back and watch it again.
@@dubbmoon if we think abt it you're right lol
Punchline's origin
And Joker was a crossover of The King of Comedy and Taxi Driver.
In fairness, the Fashion Kombat sounds exactly like a prequel story about Cruella d'Eville. It's only the plot that makes no sense.
"The world's first reimagined period/satirical coming-of-age, revenge/heist comedy-drama... thriller... that's also a prequel." Dead on 😂
"A film where the costumes do most of the character work."
LOL. True. But you got to admit those were some pretty amazing costumes.
aka the Movies only appeal
99% of the budget went to clear music rights and costume design.
@@kimorayn1733 not really, there's a lot more to like aside from the costumes, which were really cool.
Because disney wants to sell a lot of dolls with several costumes
@@lordbuddybear Disney is evil! $$$$ is all that matters. Check what they did to copyright law in the USA.
The funniest (or saddest) thing about this movie is that it probably would've been quite good if it were about literally anyone but Cruella.
And funny enough less ppl would've seen it.
SOO TRUE
It was a fun film but every forced attempt with the Cruella character made it so much worse, you are absolutely right
We already have one for Ja'far. It's enough
No. No one would have been interested.
I’ve hated playing sports, ever since my mum got pushed over a cliff by LeBron James.
We should make a jacket made out of LeBron James' skin.
@@rachelciel3330 r/holdup
@@alaster1403 or r/cursedcomments
this comment section did NOT disappoint
Damn....me too
"Just make a new movie, we promise we'll see it... Maybe..."
*looks at A Wrinkle in Time box office*
I guess that means another ten live-action cartoons
or just ... make an actual animated feature instead of purely live action.
Who am I kidding Disney Animation is dead.
That was an adaptation.
That already had a movie made in 2003, so neither. It’s just another remake
@@metazoxan2 yeah all the Best cartoon movies are being made by DreamWorks now
Cruella: “I only wished to have a coat made out of puppies.”
Everyone: “Why would you do that?!”
Cruella: because it looks cool, is why!
Starkiddddd
Disregard that
@@PerriwinklePadfoot Immediately gets that song in my head. No complaints though amazing song
At least Cruella didn't have to deal with the humiliation of being defeated by demonic furniture and having her love fall for a buffalo monster *in a cape* .
"This film is an excuse for two fashionistas to dress fight each other" 😂
That part in the movie where the dogs killed her mother honestly I burst out laughing
🧐
What's wrong with you?
The Bruce lee jump kick the dog did
@@sbsnate2312 It's Dalmatians drop kicking someone off a terrace from the director of "I, Tonya", the Tonya Harding biopic, and one of the writers of "The Favourite". That scene was meant to be hilarious.
Man same 😂😂😂
I still can’t get over Dalmatians killing Cruella’s mother. It’s so cliché!
With a drop kick
yeah real evil doesn't need a reason... and that is actually more scary
More dumb than cliche
Ridiculous
@@raj_a_jaiswal drop kicking dalmations are TIGHT!!
“Alright, we need to release a new movie before people get bored. Ideas?”
“How about one where we try to get the audience to sympathize with a slightly insane dog murderer?”
“Fucking brilliant, Jim.
_Slightly_ insane?
This is just paving the way for the mother of all "lets explain the villan" projects, the movie about little adolf and how he dealt with being rejected from art school.
Actually, there have been books about Adolf Hitler's youth, based on the few remaining accounts people still had from that time.
Difference: While they paint a humanizing picture, it's not exactly flattering... unlike this freaking movie -.-
There was a movie that kind of explored that. I think it was called “Max”. John Cusack was in it.
Little Genghis Khan and how his mother was kidnapped by another tribe.
Are you seriously comparing this movie's Cruella to hitler?
Actually, why does every damn comment section on TH-cam innevitably ends up making a reference to Hitler?!
@@rodrigoestebanmartinezardi6661 It is an internet rule. Godwin's Law must be obeyed.
Honest Trailers: says "Morning, nice day for fishin ain-t it? Hu ha!"
Me: HE DID IT! HE SAID THE THING
The only good laugh I got from this.
guess they watch Viva La Dirt League too lol
Epic NPC man
It is, indeed, a nice day for fishing.
Mornin'!
"The Devil Wears Paw-da" was right there for you 😭😭😭
De Ville wears Paw-da
to the top!
that's perfect, along with @danielle khan suggestion
Thank God I wasn't the only one who found it wrong that this movie implied Pongo and Perdita were siblings!
I don't think you understand animal breeding.
Most dogs that breed are
@@dubbmoon well, pure breeds. Mixed breeds, not so much.
Dude, they're dogs, not humans. What's with all the people on the internet crying over this and the Lion King?
@@TaurielTheElf People are capable of having empathy for the animals?
Damn that "think Mark, think" caught me off guard. Sounded like it was said by JK Simmons himself.
sounded like Seth Rogen to me
"Because Disney is well aware that white women care more about dogs than other human lives" I MEAN HE'S NOT WRONG LMAAAO
I'll own it.
Yep, they managed to be misogynistic AND racist at the same time
@@gabrielleroux2333 you're absolutely correct! They assume that men or black people care more about humans than dogs -.- disgusting to accuse people of such a thing!
@@gabrielleroux2333 despite how nowadays society nowadays acts so misandrinistic
@@stefanmakara373 despite society seems to bash men in such misandry ways
That "Think, Mark, Think" was on point!
Please say, "The missions change. They always do."
Even cortana
"I understood that reference"
Halo is back baby
It's good to see Halo back
Looked for this comment after he read it in the next video!! Well done!!
These remakes are an excuse to renew the copyright for old movies that would otherwise pass into the public domain and no one can convince me otherwise
That's exactly why
That's probably one of the reasons, but they still want to make money from these movies.
Bro that's true. Disney has actually been trying to get that law about the time limit removed. But I don't think it's going to happen
You just blew my mind! I totally forgot about the copyright renewals! I swear, Disney will do anything to prevent its properties from falling into public domain.
1000% why
Next prequel movie they're gonna make:
Origin story of the missile from the Iron Giant.
Origin story of the iceberg from Titanic
Lol it going to be evil queen in the snow white, or the step mother in Cinderella
OOOOOOOHH!
Nah, it will be the meteor that killed the Dinosaurs
No, it'll be about how a gnome named Dopey was found and raised by a family of dwarfs!
I was watching a video about the film, and someone in the comments section wrote: "So, this movie would have been much better if they had removed the name Cruella from it."
I said the same thing myself about Joker. That movie could have been an interesting psychological drama had they not tied it into an established IP. I'm a huge Batman fan and could barely make it through due to the numerous connections (looking at you Thomas Wayne). Unfortunately it made over a billion dollars, so here comes Disney with theirs's. End Rant
@@fancydragon2160 Yeah but the big difference is that The Joker movie actually connects well with the universe DC has, while this one goes against everything established in the original
it could be better, but is a Disney movie... but.. still better than any other live action in the last decade...
@@leonardovenancio6096 Yeah but Joker was meant to tie in, while Cruella is a retcon franchise, the same way Maleficent is. It isn't like this movie makes 101 Dalmatians not make sense, they are two different franchises.
Emma Thompson's character is the one that should supposed to be Cruella, minus the not killing dogs part. Cunning. Evil. Not redeemable. Throughout the movie I keep thinking she's supposed to be Cruella lmao.
The next movie will be a sympathetic look at the Baroness origin story.
You're right. Disney just kicks the cruella can down the road. Lazy.
I can only imagine what his reaction is going to be when he finds out there’s a Gaston prequel in the works.
_raging Epic Voice Guy noises_
Nooo God! No God please no! No! No! NOOOOOO! - Michael Scott
*Cinima sins sigh*
Oh god why...
Gaston's parents were killed by books. Thats why he hates........reading.
“White women care more about dogs than other human lives”
Jesus Christ my abs 😂
weird flex but ok
@@kohlcooke8789 I don’t think it means what you think it means
@@kohlcooke8789 it’s okay Kohl don’t worry I too was an edgy tween that thought I had to validate people’s comments on the comment section of a video that is publicly viewed
@@Lcavila94 chill out dude I just found it a bit funny. throw away joke, I know.
Oh god, no
"Let me get this straight; you think Dalmatians Spartan-kicking her mother off a cliff is funny??"
"I do. And I'm tired of pretending that it's not"
"Finish Her!
Cruelality"
Love the Mortal Kombat nod here, Honest Trailers.
Excellent!
Excellent!
I can guess what Cruella’s animality would be
@@stefanfilipovits21 a hedgehog
If the older woman was cruella that would have made more sense
Right?
She was cruella on the first live action
Honestly, I really like the Cruella film. It was enjoyable and one of my favorites. That is if you detach it from the original movie. Don't get me wrong, 101 Dalmatians is a classic. But Cruella deVil is not a character that should be redeemed. The character in the movie felt entirely different from the puppy skinner in the original movie. It doesn't give cruella any reason to hurt Dalmatians and I feel sorry that Estelle had to turn into Cruella because it makes the film seem so much sillier. It tries to redeem Cruella, but it comes up with the most basic way of doing it. If Cruella had a differently named protagonist, who turned into a different character, it could have turned out so much better than what it is. Because being connected to the original makes the plot kind of fall apart.
Prequel trilogy was the fall of Anakin, not his redemption. That would be Return of the Jedi.
True. And Revenge of the Sith made his redemption more difficult to accept, since he murders children and Force-chokes his pregnant wife.
Yep and he died killing the Emperor. So Anakin/ Vader didn’t have to stand trial and then be executed for all the war crimes he committed.
If anything, I think the prequels made people hate Vader more. But not for the reasons George Lucas wanted.
@@MandalorV7 The Emperor abolished the courts.
Which is also what Joker was
"Morning,Nice day for fishing,aint it?Huhuh"
I understood that reference
Honeywood 🥰
That reference absolutely made my day!
"Hel-lo, Adventurer and welcome to the town of Honeywood!"
Sorry, wanted to write this for enternity XD
*pathetic cry*
@@R.M.MacFru what do muggers do?
You know… if this movie just chose to be its own movie, like just a movie about a fashionista fight that wasn’t Cruella Devil, but was it’s own character… it could’ve been a fine movie. Heck, a good one. Why do we need to make these dumb origin films? Just make new stories! Please!
Would require more money to market, would be a start from zero pitch... thats why they do these things
Because then fans of the original movie wouldn't flock to watch it
I think it’s a case of rewriting what we think of villains to make them sympathetic characters. Not sure exactly why that’s a thing but I’m am certain it’s a psychological game.
It’s funny I didn’t know about all these villain origin stories… lmao it’s too much. Sometimes bad guys are just bad guys
yeah Cruella really was such close friends with Horae and Jasper : 3 that's why in the original film she yelled at them, berated them and treated them like garbage, right?
Yes. None of this, oh they're a complex character with a troubled past, everyone's a special snowflake, crap. Batman proved that sometimes the best villains are the ones who just want to watch the world burn.
@@timwoods2852 very true. I enjoyed the joker movie but my favorite version of joker is the one who doesn't have an origin
@@jeremywoods770 DarkKnight's Joker was just amazing at this, specially since he was always telling fake backstories
It is called being lazy and not risking to be original.
Getting a Loki trailer voiced by Jon Bailey was something I didn't know I needed.
Not gonna lie, I was there for the dress fighting.
Please do an ''Every Guy Ritchie Movie'' Honest Trailer.
Oh my god... Yes please.
Yes. Yes! YES!
Most Guy Ritchie movies = various London gangsters pithily try to acquire the same thing for 2 hours (antique rifles, diamond, painting, etc). Hilarity ensues.
YES please
Yesss
How about "Wrath of Man"?
Hollywood in general, and Disney in particular have NO Imagination or ability to create something truly new and original.
Tenet and Knives Out were original films with big budgets. Original films still exist, just few and far between.
For real tho, helena bonham would make a really good cruella
Agreed so would Eva Green they both would have been options
TBF, Emma Stone was good in this though.
@@anilz4297 Yeah, but these two fit more with the age one expects Cruella to have.
@@pedrovallefin8406 Eva Green is 10 (or more) years younger than Helena and she's closer to Emma in (youthful) looks than to Helena.
The whole time I watched this, all I could think was "it's just clothes, bro".
JUST CLOTHES?!...
@@ryleighs9575 Yeah, you know. Pants and stuff.
Well, its fashion.
Anything you like can be oversimplified too.
@@luigifan001 Well, not everything appeals to everyone’s taste. To me, and many others, a film can’t be a worthwhile film if the whole focus is fashion with no interest for characters, story, or other basics of a movie.
Edit: I don’t believe that a plot can consist of only fashion, and be interesting to me. Some others might believe that it could be interesting.
@Dann Rajeeh there was a story...ig you weren't paying any attention ...it didn't flew down the river..it went over your head ..😂
You were spot on with Adults who love Emma Stone, and Adults who love Emma Thompson, but I must point out that you forgot Adults who love Mark Strong.
I count myself among the Mark Strong lovers. Villains, heroes, awesome supporting characters, voice actor, the dude can do it all.
@@stefanfilipovits21 same
I love Mark Strong - which is why his "starring" was so, so brutal
@@stefanfilipovits21 yeeesss, when I first saw the trailer, I didn't mind, but when I saw that Mark was in it, my mind completely changed. I love Emma Thompson, but Mark made me see the movie
May I add: the approximately three theatre kids who watched for John Mcrea
Surprised it wasn’t called “The Deville wears Prada”
Quoting Viva la dirts "Morning. Nice day for fishing" made me laugh so hard:)
Can you do an honest trailer for "The Queen's Gambit"?
Does every villain need a cliched, "sympathetic" origin story? Like, they took Maleficent- the only Disney villain so evil she summoned the "demons of Hell" - and made her wishy washy while pissing all over the good fairies (the main heroes of the original). Now they've done the same thing with Cruella... stop. Just stop.
Best comment on here!
Does very villain need a cliched "I'm just evil" story? Because Disney just had to do twist villain Hans and Elsa's Evil Grandfather...
They should stop with that too.
Next I want a pre-prequel explaining the sympathetic origin of Emma Thompson's character.
I mean this comment makes no sense. Cz Maleficent was not exactly a villian in the movie. You are mixing the character from the book and the movie. The character in the movie is completely different. She is more of an anti-Hero than a villian while in the books or the fairly tales, she was a complete villian.
@@DrDiabolical000 I am not mixing up the book and the movie. I am comparing the original animated Disney classic film with the live action film. In the original animated movie, Maleficent was a baby killing villain. She did not have a single sympathetic element to her character- and that was what made her great! The live action version completely changed what was once one of Disney's most fearsome villains, while vilifying most of the heroes. It's frustrating for fans of the classic Disney films.
I feel like The De Vil Wears Prada was a missed opportunity
omg that is genius
Perfect 😣
She's more likely to wear panda.
I like that one, but prefer what they went with since it feels more original. The movie has been getting compared to Devil Wears Prada since the trailer so it’s fitting but feels more obvious
The De Vil is in the details of puppykilling apparently
"Finish Her!"
I had to LOL so hard, all my neighbours are awake again.
For all it's faults, the soundtrack still slaps.
Yeah
So guess this means that any disney character with the name Ella is just going to be automatically given a mean nickname
Ella Enchanted?
@@TheStormbringer8751 that was pre disney reboot mania
Salmonella
@@clairmoon06 ono🤦♂️
@@spiderpunk94 What do you mean pre? Disney has always rereleased old films, but they just starting turning them into live action because it makes more money.
Now, do an Honest Trailer for Once Upon a Time. Cruella didn't have a tragic backstory. She was just evil for the sake of being evil. Mwahahahaha!
I’d totally watch a HT for OUAT. They included Chernabog on that show! I loved it. Eventually it just became “Disney characters: The Series” but there’d be a lot for HT to talk about.
however literally every single other villain had a tragic backstory ✋🏻😭
Evil for the sake of being evil is no longer acceptable. Every villain must be tragically misunderstood.
@@BTScriviner you're acting like they're forcing villain origin stories onto you
Then they can explain how Mr Gold is Rumplestiltskin, The Beast, The Fairy God Mother and Tick Tock the Crocodile.
Just got an Honest Trailer's narrator announcement for Loki😂 Did NOT skip that ad
Me too!
Same, I think it might be controlled
I got one for another video, I legit thought it was for the Honest Trailer for Loki at first lol
Please say "In cars movie universe, would adult films be called trailers"
The origin story of John Wick's greatest arch-nemesis
Will he kill Cruella with her dress?
@@lordkaijux5262 it's a kút the dog...
Wasn’t the redemption story for the Wicked Witch Of The West the entire “Wicked” musical?
I guess Screen Junkies do not honor Broadway musicals unless they are in feature films.
And the book before it.
Well, mostly. The book is _much_ darker than the musical it inspired. And also very much not kid-friendly.
I still have ZERO interest in this movie, but you did make me want to watch Zoolander, again!
so hot right now
I thought it was pretty good lol
It was actually one of the better live actions I thought and the only one I'm willing to watch more than once.
It's actually pretty good lol
Its quite good actually.
PLEASE do an honest trailer for ABC's "Once Upon a Time". :D
1:19 She’s definitely lucky to receive a Dalmatian for free. Irl, they’re so expensive that I’ve never seen one in person. They’re also very high maintenance
I've seen one in person. They should not be left alone with kids.
I wonder how long Rowan has been trying to get the Baelin quote on here?
Ben: "Why don't you just go in the comments LIKE A NORMAL PERSON?!"
@@NarwahlGaming that would be absolutely Outrageous!. Just go in the comments and make a request?
Please say in your Epic Voice'' I Am Loki, of Asgard, and I am burdened with glorious paperweight''
*glorious paperweight
I love that you read "Morning! Nice day for fishing, ain't it? Hu ha!" Much love to VLDL!
thank you for this, I wasn't inclined to watch it in the first place, but after seeing all the scenes I know for 100% certain I made the right choice
Can you do an honest trailer for “Phineas and Ferb the Movie: across the 2nd dimension”?
I’m so relieved I’m not the only adult who un-ironically enjoys phineas & ferb
@@stefanfilipovits21 lots of adults love it! i think its better than most masterpiece theater movies
They have to do the show first, then the movie.
Moooommmm!! Phineas and Ferb are getting an honest trailer!
Yeah!
I actually loved this so much. I expected to hate it considering how highly I idolized the previous two live action ones.
They tried to redempt the woman whose absolute obsession was to skin puppy dogs… What the fu
Guess that's why they turned her into a different person.
I don’t get it, it’s a prequel is it🤔
@@elijahdalbroi433 No it isn't, it's a reimagining of Cruella. Just treat it like an alternate universe
How though? In this reinterpretation, we never see Cruella be unkind to animals (even though that is the original character)
@@richfictionfighter Yeah but they’re obviously prepping her for the original movie. They introduce the car, her name, then her two henchmen and at the end the two Dalmatians from the original movie being delivered to the original characters. If they wanted it to not be the origin story they should have made it clear in the movie, even just a line on how she doesn’t want real fur would do it.
I think we need an honest trailer for Sia’s movie Music.
Oof
Say it LOUD. Sia you are next.
I SECOND THAT. I EVEN THIRD THAT LMAO
I just want a documentary about the fashion in the movie, tell me about the designers, coming up with the themes, specific style choices to reflect character etc
Omg yes I would love that too!
Good catch about smoking in the 70s. I was in Milk. (Shook hands with Sean Penn, in fact!) The bg acting hotline warned us "smoking is a sign of the times." Said they were required to accommodate an employee with an allergy if one complained, but made this common sense plea implying you might want to rethink being in the movie if you can't be around smokers. :-P
Please say in your Epic Voice ™: “Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear, Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair. So Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn’t very fuzzy was he?”
I'm pretty sure he's done that before. Don't remember the video but I do remember hearing it.
That was done by the original epic voice guy.
…damn it.
@@the5thsun chin up, friend.
@@slyasleep Thanks man, I’ll get my Epic Voice shout-out someday…
The fact that Cruella drove that car without any knowledge is utter madness.
Can we get an Honest Trailer for _Rick and Morty_ before the new season premieres?
Yeah how have we not got one yet? It has so much honest trailer potential
Oh I know why. Because honest trailers doesn't have a high enough IQ to understand it
Oh, wow, he did the VLDL thing 😊
I wish the name on the movie was: "How Estrella got her Cruel back"
Ok I’ve heard it a million times, but THIS is really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
They can still scrape the ground under the barrel.
@@PaladinVII who keeps their barrels on the gorund.
We still haven’t seen origin stories for Mugatu, The Genie and Thomas O’Malley.
I'll agree once we get a Song of the South prequel
@@xger21 And remake! And a sequel that takes places in the 60s
“Yeah, I want to know why Cruella became villain!” says nobody ever.
What evil she only wanted a coat
"What's your opinion, nintendolife25?" asked nobody ever.
I asked for it and enjoyed it! 🙇♂️
@@catherineswan4147 no need for hostility just cuz u liked the movie, we all entitled to our opinions
This movie was greater than the sum of its parts. Crazy and silly yes. But still quite entertaining.
Wow, I got an honest trailers Loki, for this honest trailer. I found the gap in the simulation.
Same bro same
Yeah, wtf. I'd laugh HARD if Screen Junkies sued over that, this is THEIR thing, equivocally.
Silence. - B R A N D
I got the same advertisement!
Same
Same
I burst out laughing when her mother died like that
You can’t hate it it was incredibly creative
I actually loved this movie. The actors were great, 70s/60s costumes/sets were cool, and it had a great plot that kept me interested the whole way. The combination of heist film, followed by Revenge plot, was great.
I hadn't thought about the incest between Pongo and Perdita though, eh, I'm going to ignore that.
Because dalmatians killed her mom. Sounds stupid?
It's actually her real mom that ordered the dogs to kill. *Now who's stupid?*
*They're low key roasting everyone who assumed the scene would make her hate dalmatians🤣*
They are roasting their own dumb plot.
Nope, they are roasting the writing because it was beyond dumb, also it makes the scene pointless which is honestly worse.
@@shayla106 the scene wasn’t pointless because besides tying into 101 Dalmatians it showed dogs could be tools for evil.
Dogs: kills uncle ben
Peter parker: gets bitten by radioactive cat
Hahaha, this is sooo spot on once again!
PS. Thanks for quoting Baelin at the end, this made my day! 😂
"Picking a random car from a British street with the wheel on the proper American side." ;-D
The driver should always be right.
That has to be one of my favorite alternate titles in an Honest Trailer since Spider-Man: Homecoming's "Perks Of Being A Wallcrawler."
In all honesty, I'd rather have reimaginations of old characters instead of the even more uninspired and boring live action remakes disney pumped out the last few years.
Fair enough, but really I want more original ideas.
@@inacatt oh yeah absolutely, me too. I'm just saying that if I had to choose between the content they've been putting out the past few years, I definitely prefer this more because at least it's not a completely boring real life rendition of a great animated movie
That's exactly what the movie is a reimagining. It takes cruella and molds her into something new.
I'd rather have some good original movies. Sick of the rehashing
Do Baelin's route honest trailer
_Morning, Nice day for fishin' ain't it?, huh huh!_
Motion seconded...
Baelin's Route!
I would kill my beloved Me'ma to see Baelin's Route Honest Trailer!!
@@dynamix1862 lindsey graham is that you?
Me before the ending: yeah thia video is alright.
Epic voice guy: quotes baelin from npc man.
Me: ten out of ten!!!
Same here
RIGHT? RIGHT?
Viva la dirt league!
YES!
EPIC! :p
Wait a minute! Hannibal was never supposed to make us feel sowwy for the character. Did you guys even watch the show? 😭
I’m more concerned that they called The Wizard Of Oz a villain myself
Please do an Honest Trailer for "In the Heights"