A National park in India was having a problem with tigers killing rhinos. At first it was only the young but adult rhinos were being killed as well. So a tiger obviously does have a chance of defeating a rhino. Not a very good chance but they have killed before. The two things I read about it didn't say how the tiger was killing them which is something I would really like to know. Brown bears can and have defeated tigers but not easily. Tigers have actually defeated brown bears more than losing to them. In 44 cases the bear won 12 and you call that defeating a tiger easily. hahahhaha Gahr are dangerrous but tigers do prey on them which means they do defeat them. So far you have come up with 2 maybe 3 animals that would defeat the tiger. Tigers also prey successfully on water buffalo which is similar to a cape buffalo. So again, according to your title, can not defeat a tiger with ease. Defeat yes, with ease no. As far as crocs go, it depends on the size of the croc. Of course the larger ones can defeat a tiger but 12ft or smaller, the tiger could win that battle. I knew you would bring up the lion. This is where your lack of education shows through. Lions can not defeat a tiger with ease. Only bring up the few cases where a lion beat a tiger. What about the thousands of cases when tigers defeated lions. Like in the Roman Coliseum for example. Bengal and Caspian tigers defeated Barbary and African lions around 86% of the time. Fairly recently as far as time goes, a fight between a barbary lion named Atlas and a man eating Bengal tiger named Gungu was held before 39,000 people. The fight was a bloody one but the tiger managed to kill the lion. A much more recent event took place in a Turkish zoo back in 2011. A tiger managed to get through a partition that separated his enclosure with the one next to it which was occupied by a lion. The tiger attacked and killed the lion with one paw strike to the lions neck. He cut it wide open and the lion died in a pool of it's own blood. So basically you video is full of shit. Only the elephant, rhino and hippo can defeat a tiger with ease. That is because they are all over 2 or 3 tons and can defeat any animal on earth with ease. The croc, buffalo and gaur it depends. A tiger can and does prey successfully on buffalo and gaur. Tigers have also defeated crocs although they were not nile crocs. As far as the brown bear goes, as you even said yourself, bears only won 12 cases out of 44 against the tiger. Sure some were cubs, subadults but many were females protecting their young and full grown male bears as well. Not all of the 12 bear victories were against tigers either. Some were against cubs and tigresses as well. The lion is the biggest joke. Sure some fights were won by the lion but the vast majority were won by tigers. Your title is misleading because the contend is mostly wrong. It takes something that weights more than 2 tons to defeat the tiger with ease. Anything less will have a very hard time. You really should make sure the contend of the video matches the title much better than they do in this one.
Thank you so much for this detailed and passionate comment! Your contribution has provided a wealth of useful information and clarified many important aspects that we did not cover fully. We truly appreciate your extensive knowledge and the sources you shared, especially the historical insights and specific examples. We will take your points into consideration to improve our content and ensure our videos become more accurate and engaging. Thank you once again for taking the time to share your thoughts and contribute your feedback!
Do you know tiger killing lion in turkey 2011. In this case lion's age and gender is unknown... and bengal tiger killing barbary lion. By this logic there's an account of 500 pounds african lion killing 750 pounds siberian tiger in fitchburg circus , 1949...
@@shivasahilraj25 The lion was in his prime and the story says lion, not lioness so the gender is obvious. Only the lesser educated say things like male lion. hahhahahah that is the same as saying male man or male bull. It's a sure sign of someone who shouldn't be saying anything at all. Many Bengal tigers have killed Barbary lions. Those are the two main subspecies the Romans used in the coliseum along with Caspian tigers and some east/south African lions. In 1,900 fights, the lion only won 263 of them. That is only 14% of the time. Through the years, I have read several accounts of these fights. All coming from many different libraries. As far as your claim of a 500lb lion killing a 750lb tiger goes, obviously this is either one of the many made up stories that can be found all over the place, or the tiger had been abused as many captive animals are. I know for a fact that a wild 750lb tiger would literally destroy any lion on the planet. If that story is true, which I doubt, there is much more to it than just a lion killing a tiger. About 5 years ago, I looked at 100 stories of lions killing tigers and found that only 8 of them were considered to be fair fights. Meaning a one on one and both being healthy males. There were several that said lion kills tiger and yet when reading the story, the tiger had a female name. Many more had the same titles but reading the story, it was several lions killing a single tiger. Clyde Beatty was well known for telling stories of lions killing tigers but failed to mention it was several lions killing a single tiger. He also never used full grown Bengal or Siberian tigers in his act. Only tigresses and sumatran tigers. There were even a few stories of 7 year old lions killing 18 year old tigers. People tend to think of lions as heros and tigers as villains so many stories are either blown out of proportion or down right lies. The bottomline is sure there have been lions who have defeated tigers but in most cases, the tiger defeats the lion. At least that is according to what history says. What most don't realize is all the tiger/lion fights since the Roman Empire days have been between captive animals. The Romans used captured WILD tigers and lions which if you don't understand the difference between captive animals and wild ones, then you don't have any business saying anything. As I said above, wild tigers dominated wild lions in the coliseum. These were the true battles between the two.
A National park in India was having a problem with tigers killing rhinos. At first it was only the young but adult rhinos were being killed as well. So a tiger obviously does have a chance of defeating a rhino. Not a very good chance but they have killed before. The two things I read about it didn't say how the tiger was killing them which is something I would really like to know. Brown bears can and have defeated tigers but not easily. Tigers have actually defeated brown bears more than losing to them. In 44 cases the bear won 12 and you call that defeating a tiger easily. hahahhaha Gahr are dangerrous but tigers do prey on them which means they do defeat them. So far you have come up with 2 maybe 3 animals that would defeat the tiger. Tigers also prey successfully on water buffalo which is similar to a cape buffalo. So again, according to your title, can not defeat a tiger with ease. Defeat yes, with ease no. As far as crocs go, it depends on the size of the croc. Of course the larger ones can defeat a tiger but 12ft or smaller, the tiger could win that battle. I knew you would bring up the lion. This is where your lack of education shows through. Lions can not defeat a tiger with ease. Only bring up the few cases where a lion beat a tiger. What about the thousands of cases when tigers defeated lions. Like in the Roman Coliseum for example. Bengal and Caspian tigers defeated Barbary and African lions around 86% of the time. Fairly recently as far as time goes, a fight between a barbary lion named Atlas and a man eating Bengal tiger named Gungu was held before 39,000 people. The fight was a bloody one but the tiger managed to kill the lion. A much more recent event took place in a Turkish zoo back in 2011. A tiger managed to get through a partition that separated his enclosure with the one next to it which was occupied by a lion. The tiger attacked and killed the lion with one paw strike to the lions neck. He cut it wide open and the lion died in a pool of it's own blood. So basically you video is full of shit. Only the elephant, rhino and hippo can defeat a tiger with ease. That is because they are all over 2 or 3 tons and can defeat any animal on earth with ease. The croc, buffalo and gaur it depends. A tiger can and does prey successfully on buffalo and gaur. Tigers have also defeated crocs although they were not nile crocs. As far as the brown bear goes, as you even said yourself, bears only won 12 cases out of 44 against the tiger. Sure some were cubs, subadults but many were females protecting their young and full grown male bears as well. Not all of the 12 bear victories were against tigers either. Some were against cubs and tigresses as well. The lion is the biggest joke. Sure some fights were won by the lion but the vast majority were won by tigers. Your title is misleading because the contend is mostly wrong. It takes something that weights more than 2 tons to defeat the tiger with ease. Anything less will have a very hard time. You really should make sure the contend of the video matches the title much better than they do in this one.
Thank you so much for this detailed and passionate comment! Your contribution has provided a wealth of useful information and clarified many important aspects that we did not cover fully. We truly appreciate your extensive knowledge and the sources you shared, especially the historical insights and specific examples. We will take your points into consideration to improve our content and ensure our videos become more accurate and engaging. Thank you once again for taking the time to share your thoughts and contribute your feedback!
Do you know tiger killing lion in turkey 2011. In this case lion's age and gender is unknown... and bengal tiger killing barbary lion. By this logic there's an account of 500 pounds african lion killing 750 pounds siberian tiger in fitchburg circus , 1949...
@@shivasahilraj25 The lion was in his prime and the story says lion, not lioness so the gender is obvious. Only the lesser educated say things like male lion. hahhahahah that is the same as saying male man or male bull. It's a sure sign of someone who shouldn't be saying anything at all. Many Bengal tigers have killed Barbary lions. Those are the two main subspecies the Romans used in the coliseum along with Caspian tigers and some east/south African lions. In 1,900 fights, the lion only won 263 of them. That is only 14% of the time. Through the years, I have read several accounts of these fights. All coming from many different libraries. As far as your claim of a 500lb lion killing a 750lb tiger goes, obviously this is either one of the many made up stories that can be found all over the place, or the tiger had been abused as many captive animals are. I know for a fact that a wild 750lb tiger would literally destroy any lion on the planet. If that story is true, which I doubt, there is much more to it than just a lion killing a tiger. About 5 years ago, I looked at 100 stories of lions killing tigers and found that only 8 of them were considered to be fair fights. Meaning a one on one and both being healthy males. There were several that said lion kills tiger and yet when reading the story, the tiger had a female name. Many more had the same titles but reading the story, it was several lions killing a single tiger. Clyde Beatty was well known for telling stories of lions killing tigers but failed to mention it was several lions killing a single tiger. He also never used full grown Bengal or Siberian tigers in his act. Only tigresses and sumatran tigers. There were even a few stories of 7 year old lions killing 18 year old tigers. People tend to think of lions as heros and tigers as villains so many stories are either blown out of proportion or down right lies. The bottomline is sure there have been lions who have defeated tigers but in most cases, the tiger defeats the lion. At least that is according to what history says. What most don't realize is all the tiger/lion fights since the Roman Empire days have been between captive animals. The Romans used captured WILD tigers and lions which if you don't understand the difference between captive animals and wild ones, then you don't have any business saying anything. As I said above, wild tigers dominated wild lions in the coliseum. These were the true battles between the two.