Finite square well bound states

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 52

  • @leetingfung
    @leetingfung 7 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    video less than 30min still way better than lectures in whole semester

    • @changbadinesh
      @changbadinesh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I need exact analytical solution to the energies ..can YOu do it for me?

  • @annakiseleva7418
    @annakiseleva7418 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    THANK YOU SO MUCH YOU'RE LITERALLY SAVING MY INTEREST IN QUANTUM HERE

  • @himangshuchakraborty1760
    @himangshuchakraborty1760 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much.. On 31st may'2021 I've presentation on "Finite square well potential". Nd I found this☺

  • @BLVGamingY
    @BLVGamingY 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    at around 6:00 you assume the function only contains sines and cosines instead of letting it be complex exponentials, it ends up the same because once you assume those complex exponentials form an even function, then you arrive at sine anyways

  • @vivekpanchal3338
    @vivekpanchal3338 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for explainning Better than everyone.
    👌

  • @monicapym8948
    @monicapym8948 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is exactly what I was looking for, amazing!!

  • @sharairamirez9274
    @sharairamirez9274 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    hi, great video c: I was wondering, what happens if the potential is odd?

  • @aniruddhavichare5425
    @aniruddhavichare5425 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    best explanation

  • @SampleroftheMultiverse
    @SampleroftheMultiverse 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your video is well done!

  • @kemalaziz9696
    @kemalaziz9696 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Look at the bottom of 3:26, there is an error.

    • @NiflheimMists
      @NiflheimMists 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, leftmost term should have d2ψ/dx2 instead of just ψ

  • @datsmydab-minecraft-and-mo5666
    @datsmydab-minecraft-and-mo5666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Shouldnt it be the second derivative of psi for when you wrote the time independant schrodinger equation?

  • @user-rg1nt9lf4s
    @user-rg1nt9lf4s 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good content sir. thank you .. sir kindly make a video on Bound
    States for Potential Wells with no rigid walls.

  • @emillytabara9410
    @emillytabara9410 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi! great explanation . Which software do you use to write?

  • @eliaskaroui5665
    @eliaskaroui5665 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    please help
    why E is greater then the potential V in Region 2 ?2:35
    why is V greter then E in Region 1 and 3 ?

    • @puikihung5882
      @puikihung5882 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      see the graph at 1:57. E(x) is always in between o and -V0. Hence E(x) is a negative number. In region 1 and 3, by definition, V(x) is 0, so EV.

  • @pranavgeorge992
    @pranavgeorge992 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the 2nd region E>V, does this mean the particle is free in that region?

    • @account1307
      @account1307 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No a particle is only free if its energy is greater than the potential everywhere, in the second region the energy of the particle is greater than V but it is still less than the maximum value of the potential globally :)

    • @BLVGamingY
      @BLVGamingY 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@account1307 bruh he meant in the region and, in the region, the answer is yes, but since the region is finite there are some limitations

  • @pavloslazarou3697
    @pavloslazarou3697 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    21:52 n should only take odd integer values no?

  • @kokori100
    @kokori100 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    SOS!I have a question @ 04:30 . for x

    • @kartikaloria8256
      @kartikaloria8256 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      |E|

    • @rubenlauwaert6673
      @rubenlauwaert6673 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it is just an assumption that (E

    • @puikihung5882
      @puikihung5882 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      see the graph at 1:57. E(x) is always in between o and -V0. Hence E(x) is a negative number. In region 1 and 3, by definition, V(x) is 0, so EV.

  • @Domenzain31
    @Domenzain31 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The S.E. is missing the second derivative with respect to x in minute 3:00

  • @davidhand9721
    @davidhand9721 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have a course on QFT, too? Can anyone recommend one that is as clear and good as this?

  • @edithtea9477
    @edithtea9477 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the explanation!
    Where did you graph the functions?

    • @the-fantabulous-g
      @the-fantabulous-g 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Program's called SAGE, you should be able to find it by searching sage graphing or something similar

  • @JohnDavid-iq9rz
    @JohnDavid-iq9rz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    If E = Potential Energy(V) + Kinetic Energy(K), then, how E could be lesser than V ? For E< V, K will have to be negative, which is impossible. Please comment.

    • @NiflheimMists
      @NiflheimMists 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      E cannot be less than V. But it can be negative, if V is.
      V < 0
      E < 0
      V < E < 0 is an allowed energy

    • @frede1905
      @frede1905 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NiflheimMists Yes, E CAN be less than V(x) for several points (so for several values of x). It's just that E can't be less than V(x) for ALL points (so for all values of x), because then the wave function can't be normalized (it will either be 0 everywhere, or it will blow up at x=-inf. and/or x=inf.).

  • @ashwith
    @ashwith 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would be incorrect to not use the fact that \Psi can be odd or even and do the problem the hard way?

  • @xichen9674
    @xichen9674 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is E negative? Is it always negative?

    • @monku1521
      @monku1521 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The outside of the well is 0 joules. It's when the potential is zero. Since we can't escape the potential (bound states), the Energy is less than zero.

  • @beedeelovesyouall
    @beedeelovesyouall 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so muccchhhhhh. Ur GODDDDDDDD

  • @aniruddhavichare5425
    @aniruddhavichare5425 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    E is negative because its the binding energy

  • @onlineearning8323
    @onlineearning8323 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need a pdf solution of chapter 11 problems. quantum scattering.. can I get it from you?

  • @niamphmotley
    @niamphmotley ปีที่แล้ว

    where does the 4 come from ?

  • @Paradox586
    @Paradox586 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why only even solution boundary conditions? I don’t get why sine is not considered for even solutions

    • @NiflheimMists
      @NiflheimMists 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sine is an odd function, because it is antisymmetric about the origin. Cosine is an even function because it is symmetric about the origin.
      Both symmetric (even) and antisymmetric (odd) wavefunctions are both, in general, solutions for symmetric potentials, because the magnitude squared of either a symmetric or antisymmetric function is symmetric.

    • @HankGussman
      @HankGussman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just plot a graph of sin function from -pi/2 to +pi/2.
      You will see sin function is not symmetric about vertical axis.

  • @shivanandashekhar6580
    @shivanandashekhar6580 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Easily understood

  • @YourAverageHater
    @YourAverageHater 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happens if the potential is positive? Solution without imaginary roots?

    • @zeenaligog
      @zeenaligog 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Дејан Гујић yes if the V is +, inside the well ,the solutions are exponential without imaginary

  • @arupmarik
    @arupmarik 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about last slide (no9)

  • @rukwoo4418
    @rukwoo4418 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about cos( la)=0?

  • @Chemidan92
    @Chemidan92 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 9:30 "if we want to have an even function for psi we cannot have a sin term". Can someone explain please

    • @LimosRock1
      @LimosRock1 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      sin(x) is an odd function so even if you had any even terms, the function for psi will always be odd if there's a sin

  • @dlmoney11
    @dlmoney11 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    cos()/sin() = cot()