Republican Calmly Explains To MAGA Host Why He Can’t Vote Trump | The Kyle Kulinski Show
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
- Support The Show On Patreon!:
/ seculartalk
Subscribe to Krystal Kyle & Friends On Substack!:
krystalkyleand...
Follow Kyle on Twitter:
/ kylekulinski
"The first time I ever really listened to Kyle Kulinski’s show was in the back of a cab last summer. The driver had his phone hooked up through the stereo and was pumping out an episode through the car speakers - loudly, as if looking to convert a captive audience.
“Do you like Kyle Kulinski?”
The driver, Ahmed, was a recent immigrant and apparently a die-hard fan of Secular Talk, the political talk show that Kulinski broadcasts on TH-cam. I told him, yes, in fact. I do like Kulinski, had come across his show several years ago, and, all things considered, he seemed pretty good.
“He understands what we’re up against,” Ahmed said. “Like Bernie.”
But I was surprised to hear Kulinski’s name mentioned in the same breath as Bernie Sanders, particularly with such adoration. Because what I did remember about Kulinski’s show struck me as mostly capital-P “progressive” takes on the news - the left wing of the Netroots crowd more than the democratic socialism Sanders has popularized.
It’s an impression that wasn’t entirely incorrect.
“I have no time for philosophical, airy bullshit,” Kulinski tells me from his home in Westchester, New York. “I don’t want to hear about Lenin. I don’t want to hear about Marx. I just want a super plainspoken, straightforward agenda with a straightforward way of selling it.”
With over 800,000 subscribers and nearly 670 million total views on TH-cam, selling a progressive agenda is clearly something Kulinski knows how to do - even Democracy Now, the long-standing flagship of progressive media, cannot match his reach on the platform. Chapo Trap House can certainly boast a wildly devoted fan base (and a not insignificant degree of media influence), but their audience is roughly half the size of Kulinski’s.
While Secular Talk might be more likely to be looped in with the progressive networks around Air America and Pacifica alums like Sam Seder than the more resolutely socialist world, Kulinski’s fiery rhetoric, razor-sharp class instincts, and knack for withering takedowns sets him apart from his peers. Judging by his rhetoric alone, he’s closer to a Eugene Debs than a Chris Hayes.
But unlike Hayes, Amy Goodman, or his friend Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks - who began airing Secular Talk on his web network seven years ago - the thirty-two-year-old Kulinski is virtually invisible in the mainstream media. Despite his enormous fan base, his show has never once been mentioned in the obligatory trend pieces on “the Millennial Left” pumped out by the prestige media. Nor has Kulinski’s name ever popped up at all in the New York Times, Vox, the New Yorker, New York Magazine, or the Washington Post, despite his leading role in cofounding Justice Democrats, the organization widely credited with sweeping Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the rest of “the Squad” to power.
Just last week, his Wikipedia page was deleted. The reason? “There is very simply no [reliable source] coverage of this person,” according to one moderator. In new media, he’s king - the Sean Hannity of the Berniecrat left. In old media, he’s nobody.
I suspect there are a few reasons for that. There is nothing “cool” about Kulinski’s show. (As a friend put it, “‘Welcome to Secular Talk’ sounds like something you’d hear on Egyptian radio.”) His no-nonsense social-democratic politics won’t get him much cred with the Full Communism crowd. He records his show not in Brooklyn or Los Angeles, but in a studio he built himself in his modest Westchester home. His hair is too groomed and his taste in clothes too preppy to qualify as “Dirtbag Left.” Nor has he ever attended an n+1 release party. “Not only have I not attended one,” he says, “I have no idea what that means.”
And yet he’s astonishingly plugged-in for a young man in the suburbs. Wondering how Sanders ended up on the Joe Rogan Experience? Kulinski, a frequent guest on Rogan’s wildly popular show, introduced them. “You make the most sense to me,” Rogan told Kulinski on a recent episode. “You’re a normal person.”
Much like Sanders himself, Kulinski’s show has a massive audience that just doesn’t compute with our media’s understanding of “what the kids want” or even “what the left-wing kids want.”
It’s probably for the best - the very woke and very WASP-ish decorum haunting much of the media world is nowhere to be found in Secular Talk. “Corporate Democrats over-focus on identity as a trick to divert you from the issues that unite us all - class issues,” he said on a recent episode.
Read More Here!:
jacobinmag.com...
#KyleKulinski #SecularTalk #news #politics #youtube #biden #economics #left #progressive #viral
"They're going to get rid of the filibuster and give us Medicare for All!"
Bro, don't threaten me with a good time.
They always make Dems sound cooler than they actually are
😂😂😂😂😂😂 ikr
A Republican's worst nightmare is our utopia.
We need Healthcare for All.
For real, the party of “pro life” like, “If they’re in office they’ll make sure there’s free childcare for all!! GASP” “OMG really?? THE HUMANITY!!”
I was a conservative, I left the conservative and became more centrist. The Republicans have just become a dumpster fire.
They were a dumpster fire all along. You just didn’t notice.
Good on you for growing out of it.
Same
As an Australian, (definitely not a socialist country) where everyone has access to free health care, I’m puzzled that it’s not available in the richest country on earth
So are the citizens of the richest country on earth.
We've been convinced living is a privilege and not a right and that somehow pulling out your insurance card is social capital flex like pulling up in a g wagon, psychotic really.
Because the richest people in the world don't care for their fellow men.
Because America is run by a bunch of greedy fascist.
It really is barbaric.
Free healthcare!! I'm clutching my pearls. I love how Republicans can make something appealing seem apocalyptic.
It's not free. Taxes will be jacked up sky high for that.
It's not free healthcare. It's free at the point of consumption. It's paid for taxation according to the ability to pay. And consumption is according to need rather than the ability to pay.
To them (maga/gop) it is apocalyptic.
@@X2LR8better that my healthcare costs rn. Fuck for profit healthcare.
Tax big business, Wall Street, and billionaires.
@X2LR8 probably less than what I'm already paying for insurance
Dems MUST take the senate.
Absolutely!!!!💙💙💙💙
It will be pretty hard though. Even if Dems perform optimistically, it could still be 51 GOP vs 49 DEM
@@Matt-Thomas10Dems will do at the VERY LEAST that well: West Virginia is gone and the latest (but questionable) Montana poll has Tester suddenly behind (when he was leading a few days ago?). So, I think Tester survives because Harris’s winning margin, everywhere, will have coattails because of turnout exceeding expectations….So, Toomey is dreamcasting: it looks like the Dems will take it all in November….
Let’s goooo!!!
💙💙💙
We have it, let’s keep it.
Harris has said multiple times NO new taxes for anyone making less than 400K.
Meanwhile Trump will add a 10% tax on every none domestic product and a 40% tax on products from China. That’s all tariffs are. It’s basically a 10% national sales/VAT
Yeah, but the people making more than that profit from convincing the rest of us otherwise.
Well we all know the truth does not matter to the MAGA supporters
@@tsharabrown3719 Trump claimed in the debate vs Biden that he would increase taxes by 4-5x, which is a ridiculous lie, and hardly anyone mentioned it.
How about $1400 yearly
CNBC host is so outraged that Toomey isn't blindly backing Trump.
Why does it have to be "blindly"? Maybe he's outraged that he isn't doing a deeper analysis and considering all factors.
Kernan's soul was replaced by dollar bills 1/2 a century ago.
@@BeeN-fy2jh Goofy
@@BeeN-fy2jhWhat other factors are you talking about?
@@BeeN-fy2jh If he did consider all factors, he'd really not back Dumpo.
People talking like Harris is far left is hilarious
Anyone that isn't super conservative is called left wing. It's ridiculous
One day Democrats will figure out that Republicans are going to call them communists no matter what they do (or don’t do) and actually do some good.
@@SerenaS-h8cGoes to show how right wing American mentality is
Yeah I have friends that actually think she’s a communist. I’m like bruh she’s talking about cutting taxes and red tape on housing regulation she sounds like a republican sometimes lmao
For American politics, she is pretty far left
Wow an actual Republican that stands by the party values
Rare to see
It is VERY important to remember that Toomey is only saying this because he is not currently in government.
MAGA has full control of the Republican party.
I don't believe in giving the republicans the benefit of saying they have values that have been hijacked.
This dude would still vote to camp trans people and fuck the working class probably
To be honest there are plenty of Republicans who don’t back Trump. It’s an unprecedented amount of a presidential candidate’s party members that don’t back their candidate.
you're technically correct as republican values dictate they obstruct solely on the basis of partisanship to make sure congress gets nothing done to actually help the american people which is exactly what toomey says he wants to see. its un-american to overthrow an election so let's dial it back one or two notches and just stop congress from functioning so it can't do anything to actually help the american people or improve their lives. their values are antithetical to a functioning healthy society.
Yep i respect it
So what I'm hearing is that if we want anything to get done, we need the house, the senate, and the presidency.
Absolutely need all 3! 🇺🇸💙🗳️
PRETTY MUCH, yeah.
You'd also need the Supreme Court at this point too.
Also, having all three branches is not a guarantee either. Gotta also deal with potentially rogue members of their own party in both the house and senate, especially if it's on anti-corporate/pro-economic legislation.
AND to hold their feet to the fire. Dems had the triple during '08-’10 and failed us.
Yes
Which is great, but wanting to basically paralyze his own nation for four years out of spite of progress is lunacy.
Yes, let's be clear, policy-wise Pat Toomey is a horrible SOB, but he just happens to at least think democracy should remain somewhat intact.
Yes exactly. It also mean that he would consider voting for the rapist or the confidential document thief traitor, or the sovereign country invader apologist, or the financial business genius who left us $ 7.8 Billions deeper in the hole Yey, none of that really matter.
There’s no American economy without America… There’s no America without a peaceful transfer of power… No kings in this hemisphere!
...uh hey, Canada here...😂
Yeah and we're the 9th largest economy in the world 🇨🇦🎉 If we weren't the 'mouse sleeping next to the elephant' maybe that would be better known 😂
@@Zyo117 Ahhh about the figurehead of your commonwealth... You probably would not want him making *decisions.*
@@4362mont...yeah but the post was about "no kings in this hemisphere". It's Canadian law that needs all provinces to agree to remove the King. So unless the monarchy actually dies, there's a King in this hemisphere.
@@Zyo117 True-- but be glad he's not, likel, an absolute monarch.
Which of your provinces won't agetee to that, if I may ask? I mean, if India & Ireland can do it, why not the Great North?
Hey Republicans.. YOU could have run someone other than Trump. That's what YOU could have done.
Exactly!
It's like Nikki Haley said. "The party that gets rid of their OLD nominee first, WINS"
Who won the Democratic primary?
@@arminius8631and the winner decided to back out and there was overwhelming support for the new candidate at the DNC
@@davidloepke6414So they had a vote?
If you never stop interrupting you can't be proven wrong.
Republicans are on record as saying that an insurrectioinist is preferable to someone with views they disagree with.
Just as a side note, I saw Jimmy did a video on Kyle and it’s funny how his comment section is 90% right wingers. That whole “audience capture” really hits with him.
Considering jimmy personality and how he is desperate for controversy and attention, the way Kyle always refuses to take the bait and clap back must drive him absolutely CRAZY
That video was actually pretty funny ngl, but in the most pathetic way possible. Keep doin’ you, Kyle, and keep up the great work!
I dropped Jimmy the grifter years ago and I'm still here.
@@michaelserwetnyk1607what’s with the right wingers loving those videos with the slap montage
@@Jawsnake I have no idea what that was about tbh. But it sure got really annoying really quickly
I love how in the face of "Trump tried to end democracy" the other guy's response is "but may taxes!" Which is an admission that he makes over $400k a year. So a slight increase on his $400k a year salary is worth ENDING DEMOCRACY!
All of these corporate media are making well over a half million without a doubt
A message to voters believing Trump would help you with your pocket book. Last time I looked in my wallet, I didn’t see any Freedom in there or my right to vote. Those things are priceless.
No Tim Pool and Dave Rubin video today? They took money pushing content for Russians.
Kyle is usually a couple of days behind on news since he has to research and structure before hand. He’ll probably get to it tomorrow or Monday.
Kyle to this day is too naive to realize that Russia is pumping billions of dollars every year into conservative Republican propaganda.
All the far right loves Russia, he still thinks this is just pure coincidence
Forget AIPAC, i belive that Kremlin is the biggest donor to the Republican party
I hadn't heard this yet. Thanks for the heads up!
@@taco6989 Sure, i just figured since his wife was talking about it he would be aware. He loves a good Dave Rubin slamming:)
"pitchin' a tent in my pants right now". roflmao
Pretty crass. What will Kyle's second career be?
My wife was in my office and overheard when he said that and she busted out laughing
@@presence5426Big Seltzer’s marketing team for sure. Maybe even leads that team who knows
@presence5426 yet any MAGA lunatic can say any grotesque thing they want. And they do.
@@presence5426 OF?
I agree. This reminds me of Mike Pence. I’m not a fan of Mike Pence but at least he upheld the constitutional process on January 6 and he doesn’t endorse Trump! At least the dude has a moral compass, even though I don’t agree with him on his policies.
Because his son told him he had to uphold the constitution
"The left wing is controlling the party!"
*stares intensely at Gaza*
We need AIPAC, Wallstreet, Big Pharma, Oil Companies, the NRA, and every other corporate interest outta our elections!
Yeah. The left wing would have nipped that conflict right quick if it was in charge.
That anchor is insufferable..
That's a full blown wig, a toupee is just a topper
Hair systems are a valid way to deal with hair loss. It's gender affirming care. I figured this community would understand
@@veilmontTV Yeah, I do understand but if I were to appear on tv, I'd get a better wig.
@francelaferriere6106 better than having no hair system. I don't need one but if I ever did I'd use one.
"What do you think about Grlarblarblar?"
"Well I-"
"GABLAHBLAHBLAHG!!!!"
"To answer-"
"BLERGLERBLERGLERGBLERG!!!! LALALALALALA!!!!"
Holy shit, how does anyone willingly subject themselves to watching this truly agonizing cable news bullshit. Right-wing interviewers have reached the point where if the person doesn't agree with them, they let them speak the exact same amount as they would've if they hadn't even been on the show.
Not new
This was a perfect summary of that entire interview
This is the case for all MSM.
Why can't he leave the man to talk is that the way you interview someone
A couple decades ago I liked Kernan on the morning CNBC market coverage. He was a little bit of a smart-ass but would inject bits of insight to discussions to motivate keeping in touch with reality. But something about the 2008-onwards financial crisis seemed to just break the souls of some of the CNBC hosts. A group of them became angry, spiteful, uninformed, and overtly political all the time. They just opted into incinerating whatever value they used to provide.
Kamala used to support Medicare for All which is why he says that, but she has backed away, sadly
True. 4 years ago. Bernie lost and we had a global pandemic. MFA was a good campaign line, but was never likely to happen.
A book came out talking about how she was just using it because it was popular but she wasn't really big on it.
The only reason I would vote for her because her VP pick is Tim Walz
Kamala Harris is a full blown hypocrite. It may help get her elected, though.
That could change.
"Huge tax increases" to what? Increasing corporate taxes back to what they were in 2016 when the economy was doing fine?
Imagine the horror of a grossly wealthy person having to forgoe their third megayatch purchase. It's a cruel world out there.
@@matthewhartman7176But they need to help the poor billonaires and the needy corporations to go Trillionaires less Tax, regulations and more welfare (subsidies) for the richest
He won’t even let him speak.
Our founders were historically literate and they made peaceful transfer of power a tenet for a reason . A lot of civilizations meet a slow and ugly end through repeated wars of succession. There is no room for compromise on this issue if you love your country.
Many of our founders came from high-society, aristocratic, and sometimes royal bloodlines from England, like George Washington's own mother.
Make no mistake, many of them were well-spoken, well-educated, well-traveled and well-connected. Even though our understanding of the broader world and the fact that technology has vastly evolved since the 1600-1800's they could speak, argue, and debate most modern commentators under the damn table. They would make people like Vance and Shapiro look like uncivil peasants working the fields.
They avoided too much political hackery. It was considered buffoonery.
Well when you listen to the host you see what their priorities are.....IT'S NOT FOR DEMOCRACY THAT EVERYBODY CAN PARTICIPATE IN. FOR DAM SURE.
“”I can’t support trump but I’ll vote for somebody just like him who hasn’t tried to overthrow the republic yet.”
That's cool, as we still need two parties. Republicans still sucking up to Don OLD. I don't get it!
@@jobicase7387 The two parties should be the centrist/neoliberal Democratic Party and a new party that’s leftist. GOP destroyed itself with fascist attempt to dismantle the Constitution.
@@jobicase7387 The GOP crumbles and we have the Democrats split into Neoliberals and Progressives. We'd probably still be right of several countries.
That is essentially what he is saying. If convicted felon 45 had not tried to overthrow our government, Toomey would be voting for him. Never mind all of the other crimes he has committed.
You can't fix stupid!
The guy's position is simple: he knows the practical consequence of not voting for Trump, but he doesn't care because Trump is just that bad.
The Repubs should have picked a better candidate for the seat of President, but the host doesn't want to hear that.
Totally. They could have picked someone more reasonable, which would instantly make Harris a harder sell.
But those "they" no longer control the party. The GOP IS the MAGA party now, and there's no way in hell they were going to select anyone else other than their Supreme Orange One.
So, I say, let them eat orange cake.
OMG! I'm disgustingly rich! How am I going to pay higher taxes?
Boo f'in hoo
Taxes are supposed to be based on one's ability to pay.
I agree with you. That is the type of person you can disagree with but still have a conversation about what's best for the country.
Absolutely. It's the bare minimum to care about democracy and be willing to have conversations. That's all that I ask. If you don't defend democracy, you aren't preserving our rights to change the problems we have. If you care about the problems, you will defend them whole-heartedly
Live in basic reality and don't be an intentional asshole.
Universal healthcare is amazing! Knowing every citizen is looked after health wise, is relief. Politicians use the same healthcare.
You're killing it Kyle
Pennsylvanian here, im surprised but not at the same time about Toomey
It’s so funny when a conservative is like “aw man, if these democrats get total control of Congress there’s going to be [list of amazing policies]”
It’s like they’re campaigning for her!
“We’re all familiar with that.”
Good, so why are you asking the question then?
What United States voters need to understand on Medicare for all, is this: insurance premiums, co pays and whatever else, all stop. If u need care, u go to your doctor or hospital and that's it. No insurance, no bill, no nothing. It's all now covered by taxes. This is the daily reality of every person living in the developed world, except for the United States. And because it no longer depends on employment, every one is covered, for everything needed to keep u healthy.
Bernie Sanders gives out the pamphlet and brochure on the daily to the American people since even before 2015. I think the majority of Americans understand at least the basic concept of M4A by the year 2024.
It's the American lobbyists of the American healthcare lobby and the American politicians they donate to that don't want to understand it.
Poll after poll shows a super majority of every day normal Americans, regardless of their political labels want at least a public option. And yet, we don't even get a proposed bill on even that.
I think you get the point now.
Clearly, as bad as things are broken in this country, people haven't reached their breaking point yet in a way that would activate their butt to get out into the streets and demand that their government works FOR THEM.
We're still have dumb ass arguments over what constitutes actual Socialism or not. There are some Americans that freak out over anything suggesting a very mild form of social democracy.
Basically, we're starting the healthcare race at -100 feet.
I spend roughly 6 months of the year in Singapore. They have a public option. I've had to visit the ER here twice. The entire out of pocket office bill was LOWER than my freaking deductible in the States. I didn't wait any longer for care than I would have in the States and the care itself was on par. I cannot relate to you how frustrated this makes me feel to know that I'm being financially robbed by the healthcare industry, all to line shareholder's and CEO's pockets.
For those of you who purposely misrepresent and mischaracterize the healthcare systems in other democracies around the world, and you know who you are, F'ing STOP. IT. It's disgusting, unwell behavior.
Strongly agreed. Unfortunately, the part you left out was ".....as long as the Heritage Foundation says it's OK." Obama's plan was initiated by them, and first employed by Romney
Plus, you don't have to stay at a job you hate due to inability to pay for cobra!
@@66zebulonThe plan President Obama tried to get passed was so severely stripped down, it really doesn’t resemble what was first proposed. He had to make a lot of concessions to get Republican support and yet most of them didn’t support it.
I rather have the public and private sector like Japan or Germany.
i wanna hear about the tim pool thing today
breaking points and hasan have stories.
Lol what did pool do now?😂
@@emekao502He's a Russian agent according to people who believe in Russiagate.
@@emekao502was receiving money from russian government to spread pro-trump anti Ukraine propaganda
Actual Russian stooge...as if anyone is surprised lol @@emekao502
Great stuff man, you and Cenk keeping the truth at the forefront of the conversation gives me hope for humanity.
Vote blue all the way to save our democracy,our freedom and put decency back in our government 💙💙💙💙💙
as a german this is pure comedy. harris would be the a market liberal no one would ever consider her left wing here.
"I can't support someone who wants to be a dictator"
"But muh taxes"
He just admitted that Republicans will block anything she tries and will then, in turn, say she's not doing anything. How is the government really for the citizens? 😢
If you overlook a crime, you're allowing crime to continue. That's the kind of logic I believe in.
If you put a criminal in charge of a country you can only expect him to commit crimes against said country.
And Toomey is a Tea Party member. He used to have "Tuesdays with Toomey" for people to meet with him in PA and got so much push back from voters in his state that he cancelled all meetings with all constituents.
I respect Toomy's position.... and other Republicans who share that position but the flip side to that is no vote for Harris keeps her numbers from increasing enough to defeat a Trump win given this race is so close. It also sends the message to other like-minded Republicans not to vote for either unlike the public endorsement and vote announcements from brave Republicans who have come forward. If he really doesn't want a Trump win, just vote Blue for democracy and our Constitution. Period.
Kyle, I believe it was your Freudian slip last week that coined the term
"Camplaining " in reference to djt. It is
delightful, and I am having tons of fun with it!
Even when you mess up you are unintentionally amazing!😂
Host terrified anything Toomey says will be heard cleanly by the audience lmao
I love how they always say they won’t vote for EITHER. Really smart.
In their best financial interest
People kill me with this "if you dont vote for this person, then you vote for that person". That's not true. Your vote doesn't belong to anyone or any party. Its yours. If you choose to use it.... cool. If you don't, nobody gains a vote from you. Unless their assuming your vote belongs to them to begin with.
I get where you're coming from, and in a rank-choice voting system that logic would be really befitting and welcoming. I used to argue the same thing in the past. What you're stating isn't a falsehood, but it's not effective, because it's not the system we have. I've had to reckon with that over the years.
We have a two-party (monopolized) winner takes all system in a representative democracy. What this effectively means is that the losers of each contest effectively lose faithful representation for 4 years, but more realistically 8 years. That's a lot of time for policy, good or bad to affect someone's life.
Ultimately, this is a nuanced back-and-forth conversation between a concept and effective reality. It deserves the subtext.
Conceptually, you vote for the candidate that you feel is worthy of representing and hopefully championing your values like you illustrated. That is democracy in its purest form. Guess what? We don't have that form of democracy., and never did.
Effectively, in the actual form of democracy we have there WILL BE a loser and a winner, even in a contested election. So, if you don't vote, your vote in "non-form" goes to one or the other since you will live under the winner's rule whether you like it or not. So, you vote for the person that more closely aligns with your values so you're not under the rule of the person whose values further align with yours. Do you want level 3 pain or level 10?
Make no mistake my friend, I'm not apologizing for the system we have. I think it's corrupt and emboldens politicians to engross in incrementalism. I would love nothing more than to have a rank-choice voting system, where that would allow voters to actually vote for who they actually see most fit for the office.
@matthewhartman7176 yea. I definitely get where you coming from, and you certainly aren't wrong. It's also why I never knock anyone for how they vote, or if they choose not to vote. Now I wouldn't say not voting is a great option, but it's an option, and I get how people can get to a point of disconnect with this system, and feel as if neither party truly represents them. That's not even counting the electoral college and that whole system where a person could win the popular vote and lose the election. It's the assumption these people operate with that your vote is already cast for them.... and if you don't give it to them. They want to shame people and claim that it now counts for the other candidate. They look at people votes as losing them. Instead of feeling like they need to earn them. Which as an independent is kind of crazy to me.
FACTS!!!!!💯💯💯
When he said that every real progressive laughed and then inside we realized that none of those things are going to happen, as wonderful as they sound.
I respect him too!
How can CNBC be so different than MSNBC?
So that “MAGA TH-camr” (Jesse on fire) that destiny roasted in there debat, is calling out Kyle saying that Kyle cherry picked clips to make him look worse than he actually did and wants to go on. Kyle’s show to prove that he wasn’t completely owned by destiny. I need this to happen!
MAGA brings deceits. Kyle always brings receipts. I know who will win.
@@rustinusti oh obviously Kyle. I just need more content lol. I actually used to watch Jesse on fires TH-cam back in the day (its mostly a MMA channel) and stopped when I realized that he is literally an airhead. So this is gold for me. I doubt that Kyle would actually bring him on to talk, but I’m hoping for at least reply video lol
You mean the tool whose entire defense was "I don't know anything about that, but you don't like trump, so you must be wrong"😂
@@adventuroushermit2590 the very same lol, the best part is he’s on his own TH-cam channel trying to convince everybody that he actually did pretty good in the debate and his own community is having none of it! Hahaha
@@adventuroushermit2590 the idea that if someone doesn’t like Trump that must mean that there brainbroken any thing they say about about him will be instantly biased. is one of the most meta-biased things I’ve ever heard lol
That "show" is no longer welcome in my house!! We used to watch it all the time! No more!!
Well I'm glad some republicans are pulling the cool aid down the sink That's a step in the right direction
Just discovered this channel a few days ago. I like it!
💙🌊Let’s make America great for the working class. Democratize the workplace, strengthen co-op and union solidarity🇵🇸Ⓐ☭🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️💫
Missed the Ukraine flag there buddy
3:34 The whiplash I felt, seeing Anya Forger in the background of that clip
The content of your channel is very good. Deep analysis yet done with humor and finesse.
Bravo!!! following u from France
That first dude you cut to is like, "They'll never know it's a toupe." 😅
I _really_ wish someone would just say "could you shut the hell up? You're annoying" to any talk show host who interrupts. And then after they shut up, say "if you're that afraid of the truth, then don't invite me".
Yeah, yeah, yeah, he committed treason. Let’s just move right on past that. 😂
What a despicable clown.
The hilarity of this guys show being called "Squawk Box" is great.
"Well, Sir, to answer the first part of your ques..."
"SQUAWK!"
"...um... your question, I think that if we look at least year's da..."
"SQUAWK SQUAWK!"
"Stop that..."
SCOTUS has lost its credibility and should be expanded
I interviewed for a job with Pat Toomey back in late 1999 or 2000. He was in the US House at the time (during his first term).
I agree with Pat Toomey. Neither Trump nor Harris. I would write in the name of Peter Sonski.
Pat Tumi is a stand up politician if that’s possible. He represents a large suburban area of Philadelphia. In 2016 I worked for an outfit that was trying to get info from mostly republican voters. My job was to get people to answer some questions by knocking on doors. I did end up speaking w/a substantial amount of Democrats who planned on voting for Tumi. His constituents really like him whether they’re Dems or Repubs. Several Dems explained that even though they weren’t Republicans Tumi helped them anyway w/issues that they had.
Can't have it both ways Pat Toomey. Glad you're no longer in Congress. Didn't belong EVER!
Kyle is now the type of Dem where he might agree with a candidate on 99% of issues, but will still vote Democrat no matter what
Lower taxes + deregulation= more price gouging and greed.
When these guys say "the left will destroy our nation but I still won't vote Trump" what they're saying is "I will vote Trump but I am too cowardly and worried about my political career to admit it"
Medicare for all is probably off the table, but if we win the House and Senate a public option health insurance might be possible.
And the democratic party has moved quite a lot to the left in the last 8 years. It's not Hillary Clinton's party anymore
I respect his position as well because as a republican he has a strategy to not go against party values and he avoids having to bend the knee and kiss the ring
If you are registered as Republican dont you have to vote Republican?
He didn't say "I think we won it " He said "Frankly we won this election. "
Americans should have the best no matter who is in office. That’s how you make it great!
If they expand SCOTUS, that would be gravy!!
Oh. wow. I haven't seen Kyle in years, I didn't recognize you at all at first.
I very much enjoy your points of view and the way in which you express them. Thank you for being real.
I absolutely love Kyle commentary. Please yall we have to support. I'm usually broke 😅😅😅, but I'll donate 5 dollars a month to keep Kyle going. "It's an obvious toupee lol" he needs a lace front God lol.
Why is it every other industrialized countries has figured out how to provide Universal Health Care but America just can't figure it out. Sad thing is they could do it but the US runs on greed.
Fiction has to be believable, allow you to suspend disbelief, reality does not care what you believe.
Free breakfast and lunch for kids. Extended child tax credit elimination of student loan debt. 25k for first time home buyers. Shifting Supreme Court back to a respectful entity.
Don't just vote, get active. Democracy is not going to save itself. CHECK YOUR VOTER'S REGISTRATION, help people get registered, WE NEED POLL WORKERS AND POLL WATCHERS, know your local candidates by name, Volunteer, reach out to friends and families and talk to them about what's important, if you run out of friends GO MAKE ONE, VOTE EARLY when you can, and VOTE BLUE. We don't just need Harris in office but Congress and Senate as well. 👠🇺🇸💙
You need to respond to Jimmy Dore’s video calling you a hypocrite
I agree. Pat Toomey is a PA senator. People in PA make sense.
imagine voting for a guy that's on record as pro gen side , and just ignore it aka like a Jimmy Dore?
like that's not a red line? a gen side, lol just ridiculous
Joe Kernen mentions Executive Orders (in the context of President Biden doing things without Congressional support).
A quick reminder;
President Obama: 35 Orders per year, 276 total
President Trump: 55 Orders per year, 220 total
President Biden: 43 Orders per year, 130 total
Hey, Kernen....Who is it that does all those Executive Orders you seem so worried about?
When he asked for riots,they should put him in jail.
We need to vote blue across the board in November.
Nothing like watching wealthy peoole complain about having to POSSIBLY pay a little more in taxes. Even as the working class as of now pays a higher % in taxes. They always cry like a baby and make it sound like it will be the end for EVERYBODY. Yet when the dust settles they go back to living their lavish lifestyles will a big smile on their faces. As the working class continues to crater under higher prices for essential goods and more of the working class loose their homes, move into a tent and eventually become homeless, give up on life opportunities and turn to drugs. Then these same people say that these homeless people need to get back to work and the situation needs to fixed. Whaaaat!
Love how both establishment sides resort to the same tactic of voter blaming when their candidate fails to earn their votes.
Right! Stop talking over him.
Every other civilized nation has around 6-12 months paid maternity leave
I've said this before, but since when are Dems being unrealistic and in need of a "dose of reality"? I think the majority are still really worried that TFG will win and only cautiously optimistic that HARRIS will win, if that!
Why wear a toupee when you can get a transplant?