ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
The MOST CHALLENGING approach on earth - Paro Runway 15 | Real Airline Pilot
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ธ.ค. 2022
- Let's take out our 737 and fly the most challenging approach on earth: Runway 15 at Paro, Bhutan.
If you like my videos please consider supporting my channel:
www.buymeacoff...
And if you really love the videos, consider becoming a Patron:
/ 737ngdriver
Tools and addons used in this video:
Streamlabs Desktop
SimToolKitPro
My system specs:
Intel i9-9900k@5,2GHz
RTX3080Ti
32GB RAM
Windows 10 Pro
My hardware:
Thrustmaster Boeing Yoke and Throttle
Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog
Thrustmaster Pendular Pedals
“Even though you are flying with a german first officer our goal is not to go into any mountains” if you know you know.
When i read the comment: hannfff 💨
Too soon 😢
Nicht witzig
That was amazing! That final section before the runway looked so intense, you looked fast and had to dodge that mountain on the right, and you executed that final turn to the runway and touchdown masterfully! You might not have the rating, but you sure as hell can do it!
Oh!!! You are such a master. You make the approach look so damn easy. Super 5 star, in my opinion.
Thanks for such a wonderful channel.
Barty
INCREDIBLE! This is the most complex and well performed landing I've ever seen. Thank you for the heart pounding cardio exercise.
Thanks! Glad I could do something for your healthcare as well ;-)
Wow. I thought Kai Tak 13 was a challenge. Nicely flown!!
…. Well, that was a dark joke. I needed to pause for a second.
Incredible demonstration of airmanship. Thank you for sharing a very valuable educational experience.
Incredible approach and landing! And how you master to land on the centerline despite the tilted approach, wow! And here again, I would love to see your coordination between yoke and rudder! Chapeau! 😍
Thanks a lot!
Ive tried that approach for "fun" in both the Fenix and the PMDG 737, both at night and talk about a scary approach. And if I remember correctly that scenery is from Aerosoft. I recall that when taxing to and from the gate it seemed like the taxiway was very narrow with both wingtips either over or hitting fences. Either way, its a really challenging airport to fly in and out of and you get a sense of accomplishment when you can do it right.
At night? The approach is alread difficult enough under realistic conditions. Why make it even harder by doing it under conditions that no one experiences in the real world? Paro is closed after sunset.
@@Quotenwagnerianer Because part of the fun of simulation is being able to do things you wouldn't be able to do in real life.
@@Quotenwagnerianer Honestly, because I always fly with real world time selected and I’m on the opposite side of the planet. :)
@@Brimmlinn So instead of adjusting the time you fly the most dangerous approach to an unlit runway at night?
Gluton for punishment, eh? 😁
Well done Emanuel! Wouldn’t it be safer to have relative terrain on the ND? Or perhaps it would be all red and not useful?
I've flown into this airport, these pilots are well trained.
i love making this approach down through the valley. The interesting approach is the fly over and long final in the valley to the north and turning just before the monastery for touchdown. Nicely done!
This is why I wish MSFS 2020 had a decent replay system. Would have been awesome to see that approach from several of the buildings, and other vantage points, along the way.
There is a very good third party payware system available called Flight Control Replay. I used it for the footage in my Bergen and Why MSFS is the best Flightsim to date videos.
@@A330Driver Yep, I own and use FCR. I was just kind of hinting that I wish you had used it a bit in this video. 🙂 I still loved the video though!
Damn, very smooth. I am currently in "training" or rather practicing this airport in the sim. After 5 days, x>6 hours I was able to do a 1.22 g, -250 fpm touch down, although did bounce and touched down around 1/4 and on the edge of the runway. my prev attempts all ended in go around or destorying the gears.
I'm doing the 15 Zulu approach.
On the flight deck videos at this airport, you’ll usually see the pilots praying before landing. You know it’s a difficult approach when it’s in the SOP to pray beforehand 😅
That's more due to their local culture however than the actual approach. You see the same with a lot of middle eastern airlines for example.
In Emirates they even have a procedure on board how to determine the direction to Mekka.
That was amazing. I can't believe they actually fly this approach. I don't think I ever want to be onboard ;)
It'd be a once in a lifetime view for sure!
Great demonstration of a wonderful and challenging flight! I have flown the RW33 approach a couple of times all the way from Kathmandu via VNLK (Lukla airport) close to the Mount Everest. I'm encouraged now to do the RW15 approach!
Amazing landing with the pass over and tear drop turn back. Even the direct approach is challenging to me.
Very impressive landing lot of professionalism for the Manuel flight at the end 👍👍👍👍
Thanks 👍
This is the first Boeing I saw landing using this sim . Great video Emmanuel 🙏
Circle to land? I don't see that procedure anywhere in current charts? Would love to see you try RNAV Z 15.
Fantastic approach captain! You performed everything splendidly :D, looking forward to more
Thanks a ton!
Nice video! Need to give Paro another go again at some point.
You won't regret it!
What a silky and butter landing. Superb tutorial video; i will try this. Thank you Emmanuel.
Have fun!
You are my Hero! 👨🏻✈️🥇
Absolutely commendable!!!
Beauty! Try Skardu Intl Airport next time. Some say it is even challenging than Paro because after certain descent it's all visual. PIA operates it from Berlin, Germany as well.
Wow! Very nice. I've been flying the TBM into Aspen lately. That is a fun one, but Paro is waaaaay more interesting. Thanks for the great vid!
Paro is indeed unbeatable! Give Toncontin a go as well, that one's amazing too!
Stunning approach, really well executed.
Thank you! Cheers!
3:05 Oh god, you really said that :o
Just tried this. Harder than it looks. I did 3 goarounds, climbed a mountain, stalled out my plane to get back down to the runway, and literally broke my landing gear by landing at -777 FPM.
Great
Well done... I've flown this in a couple of GA planes, have yet to have the nuts to use an airliner, though!
That turn to final...It looked like the owners of that building to the right at 14:16 could have gotten an high-five from the first officer 🥲
It's amazing that the real world pilots are landing there using the 'Low' setting autobreak in the Airbus !
They will have done their calculations and figured it works, otherwise they wouldn't do it. At this high altitude it could be because of brake cooling requirements as well, you have a lot more energy approaching here than at an airport at sea level.
Jeeez, you got really close to those mountains.
I think its would fun with the A320 because of the FlyByWire system wen you so close to the moutains
Beautiful 👏🏼 great landing!
Great video how many times did you practice it before you felt comfortable to record lol. Also I would have loved to see drone footage from the u-turn to landing as well
Maybe five times or so haha, it certainly took a little while!
@@A330Driver its best to do this sober, I learned the hard way a few times :)
Pffff nice one capt!! I would take this one for real with you!!
Wowwww that was awesome! Will definitely try this out! Wondering how many passengers simbrief will generate for me ;)
Enjoy!
Wonderfully managed !! 😎👌
Super Landung!
In fact in the real life they don't use the RNAV,they use VOR cloud break instead.
it's just like Beggar's Canyon back home.
Hello Emanuel,
I'd like to thank you for the quality videos you share with us. I really enjoy flying the 737 PMDG following the procedures in your tutorials.
When I see the MDA of this approach, I imagine that you must have turned the rotary knob for a long time on the 737.
Do you please have a trick to insert the MDA quickly or do we have to turn the knob for 10 minutes? :-)
Thanks for everything!
Well done. I would love to see some wing views and outside shots of how low and close you where at the end to the terrain and the building. If it is possible it would be nice to also post that. Or attach it to this video as a replay. In any case, well done, and very challenging approach. Can understand if they would cancel this approach with medium bad weather even.
Good idea, I'll think about it!
Awesome video! You might also enjoy doing this in the new Longitude since MS nav data and Working Title avionics support RF legs
I'll have a few other challenging places coming up in the Longitude soon where the RF will shine!
Sorry for making you wait to depart from bgy yesterday night 😂 did you catch my landing?
haha, we've been so late anyway, those two minutes didn't matter anymore ;-)
Unfortunately I missed it, the ruwnay lights were so bright, it was hard to see anything but your landing lights.
Fucking impressive mate
I always thought the RNAV approach into rwy 27 in KSAN was exciting due to you flying so near high buildings. But that is a piece of cake compared to this approach
Thanks for the video, forgive if I'm wrong but is this not the RNAV Y rather than Z? The official AIP charts show Z having a southward track over the runway and then looks like a cloudbreak procedure to land on 33. Would love to see that approach done in the Fenix if I'm not getting confused!
Nice video! Interesting that you choose to land on 15, have you also tried the 33 approach? There are video's on youtube that show this and I am curious how you would do the RNAV 33 Approach...especially the path you would choose before intercepting the extended centerline.
Very nice, not one to do in low visibility...lol
Haha, would be interesting in an aircraft with synthetic vision for sure!
@@A330Driver I like low vis. approaches I have never seen before then go back and do them in clear weather. You can get a lot of surprises you didn’t see in the soup. Thank you so much for your content. I have learned more from your channel than any other and have been simming since the early 80’s.
Also the amount of fuel doesnt matter when conditions are right yea….but imagine coming in low fuel, Id imagine there isn’t any alternates close by.
Not too many, but there are some.
How does the plane know its speed? That map seems incredibly detailed; are all the geographical features correct? Or rather, to how many percent ? Very interesting video!
Not sure what you mean with "how does the plane know its speed?". My obvious answer would be "from the data measured by the pitot probes", but I guess that's not the answer you're looking for. Could you explain please?
@@A330Driver Thank you for your answer! The reason for my question is that, since it seems an extremely important matter to know what the correct velocity of the plane relative to the ground and speed relative to the wind (if I'm not confusing the terms) ? I'm assuming that the direction, pressure and speed of the wind all affect the measurement of the planes speed? (if the plane relies on all the dynamic variables given by the air it will result in different readings from day to day (in the same area) and it wont be exact measurements? or am I wrong?) What typs of referens are the instruments using in order to establish correct measurements? Do the instruments measure the planes position relative to the ground (by use of radar? or gps, if so how was this done in the days before gps? ) or to the air (by use of small turbines ex?)?
I love that german humor, BTW, no more 4K videos?
I haven't done any for quite a while, filesize gets so big and people didn't really appreciate the longer loading times.
Great! I was trying it yesterday and i failed so badly 🤣
haha, best to save the flight right over the airport, then you can have a couple attempts on those two circle manouvers!
👌👌👌👌👌
Hi Emi i have a question. Why would you fly this circling procedure if you can fly the RNAV Z coming from the north directly to rwy 15?
my issue has been the steep descent after the ridge. I'm gonna practice more but I have been going over the ridge at 13,000ft then descending at around 2,500ft/min to get at 8,500 for the last couple turns. The one hes doing seems to have a shallower descent to control speed and passenger comfort maybe. good question.
The descend is too steep, you won't get it down. In fact when I started creating this video I started with that procedure as well, but it was just not possible to do the descend into the valley before the final turn. Thus the double circling had to be done. Checking some real life videos from the approach that was what they did as well in the Airbusses.
And I thought Tegucigalpa (MHTG) RNP RWY 02 was a challenging approach. 😅
And it certainly IS! But nothing beats Paro!
You'll soon see Tegucigalpa on here as well by the way ;-)
Kai tak next
Definitely planned!
Klasse Anflug, habe den noch nie gesehen, Videos zeigen immer den direkten, slalomartigen Anflug den Fluss entlang.
Mich würde mal interessieren, wenn du diesen Anflug im reallife machen müsstest, unabhängig ob man es darf oder nicht, würdest du das „können“ oder reicht es da nicht ein „guter“ Pilot zu sein. Stelle mir immer vor, ich habe keinen LKW Führerschein, fahren kann ich den sicher, aber ob ich damit um enge Kurven komme oder den einparken kann, eher nicht. 😂
Schwer zu sagen, müsste man ausprobieren... jaja, genau die richtige Einstellung in der Luftfahrt!
Wir fliegen nichts auch nur ähnliches in meiner Airline, daher schwer zu sagen. Ich glaube wenn ich beim nächsten Sim Check sage, dass ich sowas mal probieren möchte, werden die mich auch nur schief anschauen :D
Thank you for making this video, I was hoping you would. I was wondering if you could put in your video description the approach you selected in the FMC. I have been using an approach that I start at PR777 and it winds you through the mountains then you pass over a ridge around 13,800. After that its a very steep descent to 7,400ft! Not sure if this is a real approach or not but its one that you can select in the FMC for rwy 15.
Hi, it's the RNAV Y 33. The RNAV Z 15 just doesn't work in airliners, the descend after the ridge is too steep. In preparation for the video I reviewed a lot of real life landings there and they all seemed to have follow the RNAV Y 33 and then circled like I did.
Managed to replace PMDGs default livery which they said people couldn't do. Replaced the texture files, renamed the plane variation in the aircraft.cfg and then used the layout generator on github to generate a new layout file and it appears to be working.
Haven't spotted any issues so far.
What does any of this have to do with the topic of the video?
wat are u on about
Great video! The aircraft, pretty much all through the descent, kept oscillating up and down. Is that a bug or does this happen in real life?
It's due to the unstable atmosphere in MSFS, with the current model there's not a lot that can be done about it. Default planes like the A310 or the Leonardo Maddog have the same issue.
Cool. Why is there no VNAV PATH marker on the right side of the PFD (profile below/above)?
It's optional equipment. Might not have been installed in this plane.
Pretty good attempt, but you completely forgot to check your bank angle, so I'm afraid you have to try again.
😂
3:10 hat er nicht gesagt 💀
Who said Germans don't have a sense of humour?!! "Even though you are flying with a German first officer, the target for today is not to go into the mountain", hahahaha......
Do you know what he's talking about? It's dark humor and actually not funny 😏
@mad sib of course I know what he is talking about, Lufthansa crash, but there you go. Someone is always offended in this modern world.......
@@kevinstephens3792 it was not Lufthansa btw 😉
@mad sib would you prefer Germanwings then who are owed by Lufthansa?
Question: I keep having engine 2 failures on my - 600. This time was I was more mindful and the FMC under pmdg setup - aircraft-failures - electrical, Gen 2 drive disc is orange. On the overhead panel the Hyd pump B elect 1 "overheat" light is on. I don't understand what I'm supposed to do about this. I was only able to restart the engine by opening the crossfeed. I ditn understand why this failure keeps happening? What is the proper procedure?
I'm unable to restart the right generator. On the overhead panel beside standby power under 2 the "drive" light is on. I've got low pressure lights on for the center fuel pumps and the right fwd fuel pump. Also I'm noticing the fuel temp is rising. I'm not sure how to properly address any of these issues 🤷🏻♂️ my flight is again from Honolulu to Ksan. I'm over the Pacific so there is no opportunity to land sooner than my destination. I'm still 377 NM from T/D
Hmm. QRH under 6.12, to start the APU and then switching the APU GEN on the affected side to ON. OK good I already did that. The Hyd pump A elec 2 "overheat" light just came on. My fuel temp is still rising. We shall see if I make it. 😄
Might be a problem with your hardware. Do you have a mixture axis assigned somewhere? Maybe you accidentally cut the mixture internally.
Also try to delete the panelstate you're using and start with a fresh one. Corrupted panelstates are a common issue for misbehaviour in the 737.
@@A330Driver I'll recheck all of my bindings. To conclude the story I didn't make it. About 40-60 minutes after the initial engine two failure, both engines engines failed simultaneously just like the other times. I was unable to restart them although I still had positive numbers in N1 and N2. When it became apparent I was going to crash I restarted the panel saved state so that I could at least continue on to practice landing. I hate to be defeated though. I was, so close to reaching an airport off the coast of California.
Were you virtually fired for flying that unauthorized approach?
😂😂😂
“Even though you are flying with the german first officer” Lol and at the same time scary joke )
Damn, the Andi Joke hahaha
Der "Spaß" mit Bezug zu GWI 9525 musste nicht sein ....
Ich fand den „Joke“ auch ein bisschen drüber… :/
Den verstehen die meisten nicht und lachen, weil sie denken, dass es komisch sei 😥
Title a bit of TH-cam hyperbole? ;)
It is definately the most challenging approach on earth that is flown by commercial jetliners, that is true. But it is not the most challenging approach in total. ;)
There are mointain strips in Papua NewGuinea, where you might as well rather parachute in than ever try to land there.
As this channel is primarily about airliners I think the title is appropriate ;-)
That approach always makes me cream my kayak.