Apparently you haven’t met this judge because he’s been helping her the entire pre trial hearing holding her hand through every injunction like she’s his scared little puppy dog
Incompetent. I have tried cases as a prosecutor and as a defense attorney. A motion in limine, means that a party asks for a ruling at the threshold of the trial. In other words, the parties ask the court to make a determination before the trial, in order to avoid irreversible prejudice from being injected into the record. The court made a ruling, at the threshold, and the state ignored that ruling. To make matters worse, the violation included a prior conviction, which is incredibly prejudicial. To make it worse, the violation also includes a pretrial order to disclose all demonstrative aids the State intended to use in opening, more than a week prior to trial. This is an embarrassment. The State is either grossly incompetent or deviously unethical. 100% unnaceptable. The defense has already been denied effective counsel, through no fault of the defense attorneys. The mistrial should have been granted.
Curious how you have time to comment on a TH-cam video in such depth? Are you no longer practicing and logging billable hours for your firm? - law student & honest question.
@documentingcuriosities 1). I’m certain you’re not the person I was seeking a response from. 2). I’m willing to bet that you aren’t in the legal field. 3).Thanks for your unwarranted reply.
Listen, to be completely honest the state has handled this case completely and utterly unethically. However, we all know that you’re usually deemed guilty before being able to be proved innocent in our justice system. This judge denies EVERY MOTION, this should’ve been a mistrial long ago. Honestly, it’s absolutely it’s embarrassing for the prosecution/ the state and judge. It really is.
Exactly. His 14th Amendment to Due Process, Fair Trial needs to be filed in Federal Court Jurisdiction. As, this court has proven it's not cabable of 6th Amendment.
@@sonyahandyfreedom I’m sure with whatever verdict the courts decide,the feds are somewhere rubbing their hands like birdman ready to file a federal indictment…
Funny how no matter the jurisdiction the playbook is the same for the prosecution. Be as sneaky as possible and hope the defendant has sloppy or ignorant representation. Never just prosecute based on the evidence, always try to be as underhanded as possible.
You mean the playbook for the DEFENSE is all the same...nitpick over every little "T" and "I" asking for mistrials and dismissal..because they CANNOT fight the big picture of what their client is on trial for.
@@HuChing-ob4kk Yes that's called a defense, getting your client off of a charge is literally the job of a defense counsel, Your argument isn't what you apparently think it is. The job of the prosecution is not to just get convictions but to get justice. If the evidence is not there to stand up on it's own they should not have brought the charges forward.
not only did the state refuse to turn over evidence showing i was innocent and the victim of the crime they let the detective that tampered with the evidence testify against me, failed to prove their case at all, prosecutor said they should convict me anyways judge said he agrees with the verdict, letting the verdict justify evidence instead of having the evidence justify the verdict
The jury would never be exposed to this information, as to not create a bias. That does not mean you are wrong though, either the prosecution is incompetent or corrupt. In either event, they should find a different line of work or way to practice law.
@mariod818 Let me give you the logic on her approving: Say you're the head chef at a restaurant, and you have hired a new line cook based on them being suggested to you. You approve them to start working the line tonight. Say it's too busy for you to check each meal as it goes out, you just have to trust your line cooks to do their job. The new line cook cooks a meal for table 2. Table 2 gets their meal, and it's raw and has no lamb sauce. The line cook did a crap job, but you, the head chef, approved them to make food tonight. Should the restaurant reprimand you or the line cook? The lawyers here are the line cooks. Should Fani have some blame for choosing these people to try this case? Sure, the buck stops with her. Should she be the one everyone blames because she was the approver? No.
@SirPudge Actually, yes. Who else is responsible? The court clerk ? It's called accountability. Somebody has to answer. Otherwise people and mistakes would go unchecked forever. It might not seem fair, but it's life/reality.
Brian Steele is a premier appellate attorney in Georgia… Steele is head and shoulders above his “colleagues” in this case including the Judge… that’s where all the animosity comes from…
@Peacekeepa317 Failure to provide all of the slides for opening statements. She said inadvertently it wasn't given. That's why the judge rips her. Also, if contact between the co-defendants for lawyer payments isn't admitted, that's a problem.
the judge and prosecutor ARE COWORKERS he's just gonna give the defense all the "I'm not happy" in the world but never a neutral arbiter the defense have no time to change their slides to counter her arguments like she did
So the prosecution is withholding information that is supposed to be shared and they want to move forward without sharing that information, so its harder for the defense to make their case. How is this case still going?
There's a deadline to exchange exhibits. Why are they discussing exhibits after the trial has begun? Is the problem with the prosecutor, the judge, or defense?
There’s been so many of these occurrences during this trial, it’s ridiculous. It’s also frustrating, especially on the State’s behalf. So unethical and poor representation. I salute the defense for bringing forth such issues but I doubt the judge will grant a mistrial. This will be interesting.
Everyone deserves a fair trial. This is total trash on the prosecutions side. It's not up to me to decide their fate but at this point, this trial needs to be thrown out. There shouldn't be all these mistakes and I just don't understand what she is doing. She just wants a name for herself and I hope the jury sees through it
When asked for her response, the prosecutor stumbled and fumbled through her answer, sounded like a bunch of jibberish. I think she was embarrassed because she got caught and was trying to think on her feet. This is what diversity, equity, and inclusion gets you.
The angriest he got the WHOLE DAMN TRIAL. Could CARE LESS when she LIED to HIS FACE! GBYE Gandolf you will NOT have the quick retirement you so desire.
"Our jury" "For our Jury to Get this case seamless" Words from the judge. Seems like he really wants the recognition, Conviction, and sentencing on his paperwork.
Coming from someone who once worked in Criminal Courts. She is ALL OVER the place and making the state look bad. That’s why he’s getting frustrated 🤦🏽♀️🤷🏾♀️
These prosecutors are dirty and a joke. It's really starting to become blatantly obvious. They continue to go over the judges head and not follow the courts orders. Wild considering the length of time its taken for them to even get this far. You'd think they would be treading very lightly.
It’s really the judge. He’s seen all the evidence that was submitted and knows the defendant is guilty. Which he is but prosecutors are slime balls and broke the law themselves. Case should be a mistrial.
Once you step into a trial, You quickly note, the proscutors dont mind being sleezy and being low moral. Second, the judge is on the court side, YOUR GUILTY, UNTIL YOUR DEEMED INNOCENT. All of those people in the courts are enemies with passion.
I’m still waiting to m the answer how he did not get bail. How did a Mother who shot her two sons in the head get Bond in Kentucky but he cant get house arrest.
State’s Attorney was clearly an affirmative action admission to law school and was given a pity-pass exception to the bar exam. What a grand gift to the defense that she is opposing counsel!!
Can't get right. This happened a lot in the Melly case too. This is unfair. I think as soon as something like this happens a mistrial should be granted.
He’s huge. He was so skinny when he went in now he’s looks amazing! He’s put on muscle n weight! He looks so much healthier. A few months away from that lifestyle and the industry and the evil.
Read more on this story: bit.ly/3RjyFKe
Watch highlights of the trial on Law&Crime's second channel: www.youtube.com/@lawandcrimetrials
This is exactly why the judicial system is called a circus.
Wrong zip code to expect any different..the unmmss and stuttering is unbearable
@@TruckinRoundTv kangaroo court lol
The judge with his middle of the mall earring
💀💀
Man this is no place to be if broke, good paid lawyer is a must.
The Judge isn't supposed to ask the prosecution a question then answer it for them
Apparently you haven’t met this judge because he’s been helping her the entire pre trial hearing holding her hand through every injunction like she’s his scared little puppy dog
He has to those nitwits presenting the case are incompetent…This is one of the most embarrassing cases in the history of the judicial system
@@obxclean237this is Fulton County Georgia…. The prosecutors are not capable … the judge has to help them or they will lose…. On God
Incompetent.
I have tried cases as a prosecutor and as a defense attorney.
A motion in limine, means that a party asks for a ruling at the threshold of the trial. In other words, the parties ask the court to make a determination before the trial, in order to avoid irreversible prejudice from being injected into the record.
The court made a ruling, at the threshold, and the state ignored that ruling. To make matters worse, the violation included a prior conviction, which is incredibly prejudicial.
To make it worse, the violation also includes a pretrial order to disclose all demonstrative aids the State intended to use in opening, more than a week prior to trial.
This is an embarrassment.
The State is either grossly incompetent or deviously unethical.
100% unnaceptable. The defense has already been denied effective counsel, through no fault of the defense attorneys.
The mistrial should have been granted.
Curious how you have time to comment on a TH-cam video in such depth? Are you no longer practicing and logging billable hours for your firm?
- law student & honest question.
Not only an embarrassment but criminal! Mistrial SHOULD have been granted! What exactly will it take for this judge to grant a Mistrial?
@documentingcuriosities 1). I’m certain you’re not the person I was seeking a response from. 2). I’m willing to bet that you aren’t in the legal field. 3).Thanks for your unwarranted reply.
@@RhetoricWolf why u so mad? Don’t u have law school stuff to worry about?
Cap. You just wanted to make a point, ain't hard to say you were a lawyer
I’m sick of this prosecution team
First time I ever felt like the judge was working with the prosecution to put this man behind bars. This country has changed a lot
First time 🤣
Lmao the 1st time? This must be your first time watching a court case
They always are and that's a Constitutional violation.
Look the same as it always looked.
Changed 😂
This is a circus 🎪 court 🙄
This is one of the sneakiest prosecutions I have ever seen. Their whole case is a sham
The prosecution clearly has no clue what she's talking about fumbling over her words, just spit it out..
Listen, to be completely honest the state has handled this case completely and utterly unethically. However, we all know that you’re usually deemed guilty before being able to be proved innocent in our justice system. This judge denies EVERY MOTION, this should’ve been a mistrial long ago. Honestly, it’s absolutely it’s embarrassing for the prosecution/ the state and judge. It really is.
Free Jeffery
Tell that to all the victims
Exactly. His 14th Amendment to Due Process, Fair Trial needs to be filed in Federal Court Jurisdiction. As, this court has proven it's not cabable of 6th Amendment.
@@sonyahandyfreedom I’m sure with whatever verdict the courts decide,the feds are somewhere rubbing their hands like birdman ready to file a federal indictment…
It's "RICO" and in that ALONE they don't get special treatment or privileges, stop it, smh..
Funny how no matter the jurisdiction the playbook is the same for the prosecution. Be as sneaky as possible and hope the defendant has sloppy or ignorant representation. Never just prosecute based on the evidence, always try to be as underhanded as possible.
That's not true, but there are underhanded attorneys and even bad judges.
You mean the playbook for the DEFENSE is all the same...nitpick over every little "T" and "I" asking for mistrials and dismissal..because they CANNOT fight the big picture of what their client is on trial for.
@@HuChing-ob4kk Yes that's called a defense, getting your client off of a charge is literally the job of a defense counsel, Your argument isn't what you apparently think it is. The job of the prosecution is not to just get convictions but to get justice. If the evidence is not there to stand up on it's own they should not have brought the charges forward.
@@HJW018it's plenty of evidence😂😂😂😂 wtf are you talking about
Best comment I’ve read in a long time 🎯
Man you have got to grant the mistrial. This is unacceptable!!!!!!!!!!
This is why the people have a huge mistrust with the justice system. the judge should mistrial it and admonish the state at the very very least.
not only did the state refuse to turn over evidence showing i was innocent and the victim of the crime
they let the detective that tampered with the evidence testify against me, failed to prove their case at all, prosecutor said they should convict me anyways
judge said he agrees with the verdict, letting the verdict justify evidence instead of having the evidence justify the verdict
Type something we don’t know
This judge denies denies denies
This judge continuously gets it wrong
He’s got more to gain with a conviction unfortunately
This whole “trial” has been a clown show from the very start.
Can't help but wonder if this would be the same if defendants were white...I think not!
Prosecution are hopelessly incompetent at best
The judge is just bending over backwards to pleased the prosecutor over and over again
"I havent given them everything" even when so ordered by the judge pre-trial just wow.
This judge is not following the laws he supposedly pose to stand for
Do anyone follow the law.
And what laws are those?
The Prosecution should be more transparent and PREPARED. They've had 18 mos. If iI was a juror, this would be noted.
The jury would never be exposed to this information, as to not create a bias. That does not mean you are wrong though, either the prosecution is incompetent or corrupt. In either event, they should find a different line of work or way to practice law.
@@SirPudge Fani Willis approved
@mariod818 Let me give you the logic on her approving: Say you're the head chef at a restaurant, and you have hired a new line cook based on them being suggested to you. You approve them to start working the line tonight. Say it's too busy for you to check each meal as it goes out, you just have to trust your line cooks to do their job. The new line cook cooks a meal for table 2. Table 2 gets their meal, and it's raw and has no lamb sauce. The line cook did a crap job, but you, the head chef, approved them to make food tonight. Should the restaurant reprimand you or the line cook?
The lawyers here are the line cooks. Should Fani have some blame for choosing these people to try this case? Sure, the buck stops with her. Should she be the one everyone blames because she was the approver? No.
@SirPudge Actually, yes. Who else is responsible? The court clerk ? It's called accountability. Somebody has to answer. Otherwise people and mistakes would go unchecked forever. It might not seem fair, but it's life/reality.
Only in Atlanta does the judge have earrings 😂
Naw fr
This trial already a joke after 1 opening statement 😂😂😂
Thugga got that Homer Simpson 😂..
The case is never ending
How ignorant are these lawyers..
The lead prosecutor, fani Willis is the problem here.
She always gets yelled at like a lil kid lmao embarrassment for the state
Judges yell at people sometimes and it's because they've not done their jobs.
Like he yelled at Mr Steele last week?
the state is still trying to put together a case, and the judge is permitting it, which will give the defense an easy appeal
that means it starts all over, which sucks!
Brian Steele is a premier appellate attorney in Georgia… Steele is head and shoulders above his “colleagues” in this case including the Judge… that’s where all the animosity comes from…
@@ChillScrillOfficial i know that. And I love Steele and Adams. Ysl slattttttttttttt
This judge is unethical, unbiased and should be taken off the bench
You mean biased?
The first time a RICO charge is nationally televised.
Judge got the nerve to ask Steele what his objection is. Wow. He is so awful.
No matter how much they do something that’s not right they are not giving him a mistrial
The prosecution is basing they case off lyrics . Not hard evidence
Wow the state dropped the ball big time omg….
The prosecution is playing dirty the judge is not following the law at all !!!
Name the specific law
At the very least, the Judge is opening so many causes for appeal!
@@Its-Always-Something54 name one of those causes specifically
@Peacekeepa317 Failure to provide all of the slides for opening statements. She said inadvertently it wasn't given. That's why the judge rips her. Also, if contact between the co-defendants for lawyer payments isn't admitted, that's a problem.
Sad even the way she stared at the jury as they were leaving. She is playing a dirty game. If she has the solid evidence just present it ma'am!
She doesnt have evidence
Even if we believe he’s guilty by trying him in press, his legal rights are being violated and that’s concerning 😢
Wow. Took them THAT long JUST to even find a jury and they’re already about to BLOW IT 😂
Because the state attorney wants a big flex if she wins such chaotic case andddd celebrities are involved
This prosecutor is just doing things underhand in this case over and over again and the judge should give the defense a miss trial.
the judge and prosecutor ARE COWORKERS
he's just gonna give the defense all the "I'm not happy" in the world but never a neutral arbiter
the defense have no time to change their slides to counter her arguments like she did
Not fair
So the prosecution is withholding information that is supposed to be shared and they want to move forward without sharing that information, so its harder for the defense to make their case. How is this case still going?
That has *_got_* to be an *automatic comtempt of court charge* on the prosecution *_and_* an automatic *mistrial!*
They deserve a mistrial, what prosecution is doing is wrong. And they're not even good at playing dirty, they just suck all around.
There's a deadline to exchange exhibits. Why are they discussing exhibits after the trial has begun? Is the problem with the prosecutor, the judge, or defense?
Prosecutor is playing dirty pool 👹
@@LadyAngelaYaYa1966 Fani Willis people what do you expect
The problem is the prosecutor AND judge!
Prosecutors have been playing dirty the entire time
sadly Judges are not always right !
State has shown sheer incompetence through out this whole trial
There’s been so many of these occurrences during this trial, it’s ridiculous. It’s also frustrating, especially on the State’s behalf. So unethical and poor representation. I salute the defense for bringing forth such issues but I doubt the judge will grant a mistrial. This will be interesting.
Everyone deserves a fair trial. This is total trash on the prosecutions side. It's not up to me to decide their fate but at this point, this trial needs to be thrown out. There shouldn't be all these mistakes and I just don't understand what she is doing. She just wants a name for herself and I hope the jury sees through it
the fact that the are allowed to use their lyrics as evidence should tell you how unfair this trial will be.
@@Jaded518the prosecutor is power hungry, she’s going after everyone,
But Donald Trump is not responsible for his words for insurrection
@@Edwardjones-23he is
... he called for no violence.
When you see “the state VS whoever”.
It really is the whole state coming at you with everything they got
This judge voice makes the speaker on my phone sound messed up
😅yeah fr
When asked for her response, the prosecutor stumbled and fumbled through her answer, sounded like a bunch of jibberish. I think she was embarrassed because she got caught and was trying to think on her feet. This is what diversity, equity, and inclusion gets you.
Its things she hasn't gave yet.
Lawyer standing on bidness❗️❗️
The judge done went n got his ears pierced 😅
Before anyone said anything - this just looked like a hot mess.
The angriest he got the WHOLE DAMN TRIAL. Could CARE LESS when she LIED to HIS FACE! GBYE Gandolf you will NOT have the quick retirement you so desire.
That judge really got studs on
The system is so broken 😞
"Our jury"
"For our Jury to Get this case seamless"
Words from the judge.
Seems like he really wants the recognition, Conviction, and sentencing on his paperwork.
Very unprofessional the state needs to get it together
this was intentional, they got exactly what they wanted "together"
If it wasn’t any money tied up in this it would’ve been over already
She violated the Brady rule mistrial immediately
Exactly
Is the evidence that was withheld “favorable” to the accused? Meaning would it help him win his case or does it implicate him further?
The greatest responsibility for a judge is to govern his own misconduct and apply the rules of law equally, in the name of justice! 👮♂️ 🚔 👨⚖️ 🤔
Coming from someone who once worked in Criminal Courts. She is ALL OVER the place and making the state look bad. That’s why he’s getting frustrated 🤦🏽♀️🤷🏾♀️
this is so frustrating. If the prosecution was competent in any way, this would be the easiest win ever.
She can't even read a script 😂😂😂
**JUDGE IS SUPER BIAS!! SHOWS FAVORITISM TOWARDS THE STATE**
These prosecutors are dirty and a joke. It's really starting to become blatantly obvious. They continue to go over the judges head and not follow the courts orders. Wild considering the length of time its taken for them to even get this far. You'd think they would be treading very lightly.
the judge allows bad act for the state... should have been dismissed months ago
A circus
🤪🙃
some real dirty dogs
It’s really the judge. He’s seen all the evidence that was submitted and knows the defendant is guilty. Which he is but prosecutors are slime balls and broke the law themselves. Case should be a mistrial.
If the defense does this the judge wants to reprimand the defense wtf
Would blink an eye to do so !!!! This is terrible
Look at Atlanta "playing" court. The judge's earring in the thumbnail says it all😂
Jurors faces accidentally being shown by crime 11... Should definitely help with a mistrial
So she just gets to get away with it?
Is the public allowed in the court room during the trial?
Never in my life seen a judge start rocking big iced out earrings outta nowhere🤣
So we not supposed to recognize the “judge” with a diamond earring on?🧐
I saw that 🤨
Poor display of professionalism.
@@raycash3283 exactly 🫡 I don’t trust any “judge” I surely wouldn’t trust him!
This whole case is a circus 🎪 at this point !! Free Jeff !! Til it’s backwards !
Once you step into a trial,
You quickly note, the proscutors dont mind being sleezy and being low moral. Second, the judge is on the court side, YOUR GUILTY, UNTIL YOUR DEEMED INNOCENT.
All of those people in the courts are enemies with passion.
How he start yelling at Lawyer De’williams. But not at Love that didn’t follow the order
His words clearly show how the judge n the prosecution are on the same team
Very sloppy prosecution. How did you obtain your seat?
What a complete mess. The entire room.
I object!!! 😶
I’m still waiting to m the answer how he did not get bail. How did a Mother who shot her two sons in the head get Bond in Kentucky but he cant get house arrest.
It’s sick fr
Misconduct by the prosecution is the name of the game here.
State’s Attorney was clearly an affirmative action admission to law school and was given a pity-pass exception to the bar exam. What a grand gift to the defense that she is opposing counsel!!
The prosecution isn’t prepared . This is a high class case . It should lead to mistrial due to withholding.
☝ *_"MATTA!_** / HOLD IT!"* ☝
And possibly an automatic *contempt of court charge!*
Wow wow thank god I live in Australia
The State HA! The Judge HA! Terribleee
The judge was ready for the big screen he got a whole ear ring in his ear
📢 FREE THUGGER..🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️
How long does this process actually take? Waste of Money..
however long shes using tax payers money to fund this and and using it also for trump lol
Ok thugga got a retwist looking shaaarrrrppppp😂❤
@@cvltzillaso who is he supposed to get it done by?
@@cvltzillaand?
@@cvltzilla really think he got a celly 🤦🏽♂️
Judge wearing earring in court is wild a f
Can't get right. This happened a lot in the Melly case too. This is unfair. I think as soon as something like this happens a mistrial should be granted.
Judge might as well sit with the prosecutors complete bias get the appeal paperwork ready
The judge the only man in the courtroom with an earring. They bout to let Truly Humbled Under God free
He’s huge. He was so skinny when he went in now he’s looks amazing! He’s put on muscle n weight! He looks so much healthier. A few months away from that lifestyle and the industry and the evil.
What?! Seriously?! They could screw up their whole case!!! I’m shocked!! 😮😮😮
Ga law has to ask permission no matter what and this maybe a Mistrial.
This is crazy
Affirmation action lawyers lol
Wow they'll do anything to send this man to jail
This defense lawyer is a bulldog