I was in court today and boy! She is frustrating. This case is moving at a tortoise speed because Love is not concise nor organized. She fights EVERY SINGLE OBJECTION. I mean every single objection. She cannot pivot and move on. She can’t concede ANYTHING. There is no end in sight because she is focusing on so many irrelevant details and the judge will not restrict her. The freaking jury is making $25 a day!! My life would be in shambles. Free this jury. Free these young men. Charge folks for the crimes THEY COMMITTED if there is evidence and move on!
The objections she fights are gratuitous and ridiculous. That's why most of them are getting overruled. The defenses only strategy has been spamming objections and motions with thus ongoing tone like everybody is corrupt except their clients. It's crazy to me that every comment section is throwing all that negative energy at Love for just doing her job. But nothing is said about old ladies getting shot, amother getting carjacked with her daughter in her car, Thug teaching a toddler how to stack Blood signs, the shootings, the drug sales out of the gas station etc etc. The way you all look over all the overwhelming evidence against YSL but demonize this black woman is absolutely sickening
Here's where i disagree: if the prosecution can systemstically disobey the judge, violate brady, and turn in discovery late, then how is the trial fair?
It not. 99 percent of you tube laywers make excuses for judges. Also, after reprimanding her the judge went right back to ruling everything in her favor
The state knows they’re losing this case, a mistrial would probably be the best for them right now just so they could retry it and not have 2 ways to losing. One being not guilty or 2 on appeal.
Have you watched the video? Peter says *several* times that he believes the cumulative actions of the prosecution team have gone past the point of a fair trial.
@@jaysonsorensen594yup and that’s why a lot of people just don’t trust lawyers at all. If I’m ur client and u think what this judge is doing is okay .. ur gone buddy. Ineffective counsel imo if this is how these lawyers really feel and think
@@jaysonsorensen594I knew she would. I said Loves gonna have a great day tomorrow cause Judge will go overboard to side with her. And she absolutely did and Let her talk back, Make snide remarks and give attitude .. in return judge snapped on the defense.. it’s disgusting!
I really like when you have your dad on. his depth and breadth of knowledge is helpful, and I like hearing from his viewpoint. thanks, guys! edit: Im sorry but MR SPRINKLES IS SENDING MEEEEEE 🐱
I agree! He’s like a bank full of knowledge! And I’m jus left wanting more! I wish we could get a good 2-3 hours of conversation! Like a podcast setting!
Mr Sprinkle the forensic data guy is essential a girlfriend doing a deep dive on an ex boyfriend's social website and snooping through phone itimised phone bills 🤣 I love the way he goes into minute details about everything with elite vocabulary and an air of superiority for the peons. I appreciate him fully 😂
Man I totally get it- I get that appellate courts don’t like mistrials based on all this ‘other procedural stuff’ but resolutions based on facts- but these procedures are in place to get the right FACTS. The most reliable truth. The closest to the truth that we can get. Prosecutors railroad the process of uncovering the facts in the case that they’ve brought, this ain’t a search for the truth and this should be OVER.
Peter! Im shocked you are amazing at giving the benefit of the doubt, but I completely agree with Big George! The Judge feels she was outright lied to and she was!
I agree with your Dad, Peter, that this attorney lied/lies on purpose. I believe Love and the other female assistant prosecutor are grossly incompetent, do not know what they are doing and are willing to work around in any fashion they can to win this case/these cases. I am so confused at this point and I can usually keep up with what is being asked/said during the trials we watch.
Peter I respect and appreciate your work. The impatience toward your father which I see you trying to control, is off putting. His words are wise and appreciated.
@@carlaamanda86 She isn't wrong. You must be new here. This video is actually one of his better ones and so I don't think this one is that bad. But, there are plenty where I wanted to jump through the phone. But, I don't think this video particularly was a bad one.
We love when your dad comes on so we can hear his thoughts and knowledge. I don’t know if you will see this after the stream but tell him thank you for doing this
I am a sucker for children and parents on social media. Regardless if it is something like this, or just watching videos together and doing little reaction ones, or silly little challenges. They always make me smile. Even if our parents can drive us crazy (mine sends me Dad jokes all day long).
So … my experience in the business world is, if any of my employees did their jobs as poorly as the prosecutors are doing theirs here, I would fire them. That simple. It’s inexcusable as far as I’m concerned. This is truly unbelievable and shakes my confidence in our judicial system. This is BAD!
Thank you for all your hard work. I appreciate all the extra lives and updates. I'm a prosecutor in Alabama but was in private practice for 25 years, and I know how many hours you must be putting in. You do such a great job juggling everything. It is much appreciated,. I loved the podcast with your wife. Tell her she is a natural.
Can you explain why this judge interrupts & gives an interpretation of what the State's theory and/or is? I don't see other judges doing this. I really have a hard time understanding her judging techniques. Thank you.
She flat out lied, and did so after weeks of the judge asking her to be more forthright. The judge asks for professionalism and candor and Love plays games as a regular business practice. Then, she LITERALLY started off today with more lies.
I still can't wrap my mind around how the jury survives this long of a trial! How do they support their families during such a lengthy service? I would never be able to stay afloat financially if I had to serve on this jury
Honestly I have no idea. Even with their jobs being “protected” they have $0 income currently, even if they have a partner bringing in money too that’s a HUGE drop in income. It’s insane.
The state should definitely pay them a bonus if a trial goes beyond 3 months. Doing your civic duty should not be at the detriment of a tax payers life, especially since they are also paying for the trial itself.
I got roped into this case during the Glanville/Steele fiasco but haven’t been able to stop following since because of the continued slow-motion trainwreck spectacle. I need these LYK updates to synthesize how to process all of this!
And also, I hate to say it, but these guys are low intelligence and ignorant. It is what it is. They can barely grasp what is being asked, especially when Love is being sly and sneaky with her questions.
See, that is sadly the one thing that I don't have a hard time with on this. The length of the trial works in favor of that and the things they are supposed to forget are not helping the State. Who if I am on that jury, I am blaming right now because it is still their case in chief. (edit: I meant state not defense, and if you read what I wrote I say that I am blaming them because it is still their case!)
@@CatInWonderlands Once a bell is rung you can't unring it. No chance this is a fair trial and the verdict will stand if found guilty. And the jury has been there the last 11 months as the Prosecutors question witnesses for days on end until the Judge sustains the defence's 403 objection. Why would the jury blame the defence for the prosecutors lack of competence? What are you talking about? Also it's the State presenting their case. The defence hasn't even started their case or called their first witness. Do you know how trials work? It's the State currently putting on their "case in chief" if you want to use that phrase to sound technical.
@@declan92100 Yes, I have seen plenty of trials. I will admit I had a typo (I was trying to beat the stupid commercials that erase comments). However if you actually read the rest of what I wrote rather than going on the attack, I said that I would be blaming the one who's case it was and specifically cited the case in chief, which you actually cited in your attack on me. I don't disagree that this case won't stand on appeal if found guilty. But my point is that there are a ton of people saying all kinds of things, not understanding that there is a lot of things that are actually rather reasonable or within the law that every single how people claim should be a reason for mistrial, and it doesn't come close to the legal burden. I am not a Free Thug person, I am a constitutional law person. The length of this is not working on the State's behalf, and I would from the perspective of the jury be very unhappy about that. I would hold it against the state because it is very clear that it is still their presentation. Which is something that is explained and was explained here in this case in opening statements. I would have no problems forgetting things that I need to forget, because it has been going on for 11 months. Which is at this point something that is in favor of the defense and not in favor of the state as what is being asked of them to forget is all things that were beneficial to the state. Except maybe the line about Garlington's auntie and Gaither, which was proper hearsay.
@@CatInWonderlands I wasn't "attacking" you.. You commented on my post and said the jury would be frustrated by the Defence as they are putting on their case and i corrected you as they haven't begun their case and it's already been the longest trial in the state of Georgia's history (Ms Love still wants to call 50+ witnesses and asked for permission to call them back a second or third time if needed as she didn't have the files to the defence in time to question Gaither that day). And it's completely unreasonable to tell 12 people to have selective memory multiple times.. No idea how you think a Judge telling the Jury automatically wipes their memory, or they are even going to follow the instruction and not carry a bias through the trial. Yes plenty of people are supporting the constant calls for a Mistrial, but even the Judge has said twice in the last week she doesn't think they're doing it intentionally but the State is coming extremely close to crossing the line. And admonished Ms Love after they had a sidebar where Ms Love said she would get rid of the comments on an IG post. Then left the comments on the post and started questioning Gaither about them. Then when confronted tried to claim she thought the Judge just meant "remove the comments, but as this was a phone number it doesn't count" before the Judge shot her down completely and said the Phone number is in the comments and that was baffling she would misrepresent information to the Judge like that..
She lied. Love said she thought because the phone number was numbers not words and since the objection was about comments and comments just meant the words, questions about the phone number were good. The phone number is in the comments, part of the comments. She is being purposely dense. Slippery and disingenuous.
They called the ADA to explain why they charged 4 other people for M and then dropped those, gave immunity to them to testify and then charged others 9 years later. That’s why Steele wanted to get into work product.
Sir, this is a blowup from today if you go back and look, Miss LOVE is wearing a yellow highlighter color and once again the judge does the same thing and she is literally cutting the judge off and will not shut up!!!! DA learned from Fanni Willis!!! Unreal that Georgia allows this to be an example to the world. What a total incomplete disgrace the DAs office and also a lot of these judges in Georgia. It is so disgusting!!
The judge was absolutely flat out lied too Mrs Love knew she couldn't get it in under objection so she tried to take a short cut thinking the courts and defense was to slow to catch it she's done it time and time again
I know you tell people to get in the comments and talk about cases your audience wants to hear about. I would love to hear your breakdown of today's preliminary hearing of the Kentucky sheriff who killed the judge in his chambers. If what the defense is trying to present is true (the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter) and the sheriff has a severe emotional response, how do you see this case going?
Not true. The sheriff’s wife has made a statement that their daughter has not been abused by anyone. The case lead detective said the sheriff made the statement “they are trying to kidnap my wife and daughter”. Don’t know what that means though
@@crimenurse8264 I like to think I do a very good job of phrasing my language in a qualified manner. And it really ruffles my feathers when I see somebody just say all this stuff that I have qualified is not true. What makes you the arbiter of truth? If I had a daughter in high school, and it was alleged that she was being statutoried by a 50 year old man, and as a result her father/my husband went and killed that man, and that man just happens to be a judge, and the dad/husband happens to be a sheriff, and as a result this case gets national news, and to top it all off the moment in question is on camera, my FIRST priority is going to be that daughter. Holy crap, they need to pull her from school. I hope her name never gets out there or this will stick with her the rest of her life. Whether it is true or not, I would pray the mother comes out and says it isn't true for the sake of her daughter. At least til she gets out of high school. Hell, maybe it is true and the daughter is lying to her mom. We don't know. Qualify your statements. You heard (or maybe you missed it) the state trooper say that the sheriff was sitting, using the judge's phone trying to contact his own daughter, stood up, and that is when the clip we saw in court was presented with the shooting. It certainly seems possible he saw something about his daughter that drew him to emotional distress. Did the police question the wife? No (or at least not reported). Did they seem at all interested in the allegations regarding the past deputy's conduct and the alleged cover up? Not to me. There is certainly enough evidence for one to acknowledge and maybe even believe the defense's allegations against the judge are likely to be true. And having somebody just say "No" as though it is a final decision and gospel makes my blood boil.
Does anyone...including the jury....even know who is charged with what anymore? This case is so chaotic. There is no story to follow, its all over the place and there is no way the jury knows whats happening.
Agreed. There’s at least 3-4 people on this indictment facing life in prison that we haven’t even heard of or found evidence on yet. It just doesn’t make sense
When Peter said he didn't know what Love was talking about cause she talked in circles... I felt that. Offputting. Thanks for your commentary, which helps with clarity. I feel for the jury...their lives and livelihood have been put on hold with no end in sight. At this point they are in jury jail. Awful.
When your dad is a guest, I find it so heartwarming. I can feel how proud he is of you. The love and respect to each other is palpiable. This is what love, respect and patience between a Father and son looks like. ❤
On one of the other channels that I watch there are several of us discussing that a witness that has already been called is most likely the one that did the crime and the state gave him immunity because they wanted Thug
Can you imagine being a juror on this case!? Being shuffled in and out constantly, endless instruction (exclusions) on what has been testified to, and the amount of time off. There is nothing but reasonable doubt every single day. I've watched this from day one and I've completely lost sight of what the crime is at this point. There is no way that a jury can possibly consider all of the evidence and make a decision. Deliberations will be a total shit show!
Love makes an excuse for the new photos because of witnesses they are having to put back on the list because of the defense's objections. But if the witnesses were already on the list previously, why were the photos not? Lying Love!!
When is someone more higher up than this judge going to step in and say enough is enough of this nonsense! It’s absolutely wild to me that they haven’t called a miss trial yet. This trial is off its rocker and it continues to be a waste of the jurors time! If it doesn’t get declared a miss trial, it’s going to get thrown out on appeal so let’s just stop wasting jurors time already. 🎪 This has turned into a circus!
yes but dems aren't leftists they're liberals and basically the same as conservatives besides they pretend to not hate "the blacks" or "the gays" as much and are sometimes OK with abortion. People from other countries agree, US as two rightwing parties
I’m libertarian with right leaning tendencies on policy, and this is the fault of both sides. Yes, Fani is using this case to springboard herself in the political sphere (whether that be to continue as DA or in some other capacity) and continuing this farce with a weak case and a prosecutor that is inept/corrupt, however Fani is using law that a right majority legislature codified with evidence rules exceptions carved out like crazy so the people on the right can say “we’re tough on crime!” The fact that one side cheers on the loss of freedom because they can only see it effecting the other side is how we have made it this far down this path so far, and how long until people are willing to wake up and reverse course and defend freedoms and rights even for those they oppose will dictate how far down this path we go….
What about her switching the evidence (picture) from what was approved to another picture on the sly? That is never okay, right? I'd love to hear your thoughts on that. I'm shocked and disgusted by Love's behavior.
I would HATE to be on this jury. I'd want my work laptop to get stuff done while sitting around. They must be getting through so many books! 📚 since they can't have any electronic devices
Replay crew. So, I’m going to disagree with Papa here. The prosecutor is inept at the very least. There’s no excuse for her to continually mislead the court and withhold evidence as if it was just discovered 6 minutes ago. She’s wasting taxpayer monies. The judge is giving her way too many breaks. If I was a juror in this case, I would be very confused.
The prosecution is shady. Love doesn’t stop arguing when the judge rules against her. She sneaks things in and pretends she didn’t realize it wasn’t allowed. She takes up so much time saying the same things over and over.
This trial hardly inspires confidence in the American system of justice. So what percentage of criminal trials are train wrecks like this one? I can only hope that it’s a fraction of 1%, but I’m a dreamer.
I’ve been watching this trial daily including the full days of litigation over evidence while jury has the day off. The prosecutor has told several obvious lies, has been disrespectful to the judge, and argues relentlessly every time a ruling doesn’t go her way
@@kimmcmillan2873 It happened in September. There was just a pretrial hearing today to see if there was plausible cause for murder charges. The rumor going round is that the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter. Sheriff met with the judge in his chambers, tried to call his daughter on his phone, took the judge's phone (this process apparently was not violent, judge seemed to cooperate in giving his phone to sheriff), sheriff then tried calling his daughter from judge's phone. Immediately afterwards he shoots the judge, wounds him, judge crawls under his desk, sheriff moved around the desk and shoots him again. Then as sheriff is leaving he shoots the judge a couple more times. Then sheriff turned himself in. It isn't going to trial for a long time. When the sheriff was taken into custody he apparently said something about, "They're taking his wife and daughter." This has caused some to very quickly begin saying the sheriff may have been violent towards his family, and the judge was helping them. I am not so sure about this though. The police and defense (who know the sheriff's side of the story) are talking to the daughter. Not the wife. The sheriff grew in a fury when he called his daughter, and seemingly did not try to contact his wife.
@@kimmcmillan2873 This happened in September. There was a pretrial hearing today to find probable cause for murder. According to the rumor mill, the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter. At today's hearing they actually showed the shooting. The judge was shot and wounded, crawled under his desk, the sheriff moved around the room to continue shooting the judge, then as the sheriff opened the door to leave he leaned down and fired at the judge again. What they did not show in the footage is what happened immediately before this. Apparently the judge and sheriff met in chambers to discuss something, the sheriff called his daughter on his cellphone, the judge then handed his phone over to the sheriff (so far no evidence has been presented that the sheriff violently took the phone, and reports are that the exchange appeared voluntary), and the sheriff tried calling his own daughter from the judge's phone. Whatever happened put the sheriff in a rage and that is when the footage presented by the prosecution actually starts. When the sheriff voluntarily went into custody, he said something like, "They are trying to take my wife and kid." This has led some to believe that the sheriff was abusive to his family, and the judge was helping them get out of the sheriff's orbit. I don't think this claim holds much substance yet. The sheriff apparently only tried contacting his daughter on his phone and the judge's phone. The police are focusing more on the daughter, and seemingly not on the wife. I am not sure what to make of the sheriff's exclamation, but the judge helping them escape an abusive home does not click for me
@@kimmcmillan2873 This happened in September. There was a pretrial hearing today to find probable cause for murder. According to the rumor mill, the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter. At today's hearing they actually showed the shooting. The judge was shot and wounded, crawled under his desk, the sheriff moved around the room to continue shooting the judge, then as the sheriff opened the door to leave he leaned down and fired at the judge again. What they did not show in the footage is what happened immediately before this. Apparently the judge and sheriff met in chambers to discuss something, the sheriff called his daughter on his cellphone, the judge then handed his phone over to the sheriff (so far no evidence has been presented that the sheriff violently took the phone, and reports are that the exchange appeared voluntary), and the sheriff tried calling his own daughter from the judge's phone. Whatever happened put the sheriff in a rage and that is when the footage presented by the prosecution actually starts. When the sheriff voluntarily went into custody, he said something like, "They are trying to take my wife and kid." This has led some to believe that the sheriff was abusive to his family, and the judge was helping them get out of the sheriff's orbit. I don't think this claim holds much substance yet. The sheriff apparently only tried contacting his daughter on his phone and the judge's phone. The police are focusing more on the daughter, and seemingly not on the wife. I am not sure what to make of the sheriff's exclamation, but the judge helping them escape an abusive home does not click for me
This happened in September. There was a pretrial hearing today to find probable cause for murder. According to the rumor mill, the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter. At today's hearing they actually showed the shooting. The judge was shot and wounded, crawled under his desk, the sheriff moved around the room to continue shooting the judge, then as the sheriff opened the door to leave he leaned down and fired at the judge again. What they did not show in the footage is what happened immediately before this. Apparently the judge and sheriff met in chambers to discuss something, the sheriff called his daughter on his cellphone, the judge then handed his phone over to the sheriff (so far no evidence has been presented that the sheriff violently took the phone, and reports are that the exchange appeared voluntary), and the sheriff tried calling his own daughter from the judge's phone. Whatever happened put the sheriff in a rage and that is when the footage presented by the prosecution actually starts. When the sheriff voluntarily went into custody, he said something like, "They are trying to take my wife and kid." This has led some to believe that the sheriff was abusive to his family, and the judge was helping them get out of the sheriff's orbit. I don't think this claim holds much substance yet. The sheriff apparently only tried contacting his daughter on his phone and the judge's phone. The police are focusing more on the daughter, and seemingly not on the wife. I am not sure what to make of the sheriff's exclamation, but the judge helping them escape an abusive home does not click for me
48:56 I have been watching all of this case. Love has had multiple Brady violations, Love has demonstrated on multiple occasions she is shady, and this should have gone to mistrial with prejudice. It’s wild. It’s funny watching you all who are actual lawyers being mindblown cause us non-lawyers see it and are like WTF. Fani and the DA office is so corrupt. You should watch Ashlee dealing with trying to get records.
Thank you Peter and Papa Tragos for continuing to discuss the YSL trial with all of us! 💗 This trial is really starting to feel like the movie Groundhog Day at this point.
As someone who has been watching this and can go back and rewatch, and have, I can not even fathom how confused the jury is. It’s like watching me try to clean my house without taking my adhd meds… lawd.. can you say “squirrel”??
Peter, it's exactly what your father said. SHE thinks she's winning, and she thinks hiding her hand and being sneaky furthers her case. And she does keep getting away with it!
Mark this day, DAY 138. This is the day Ms. Love broke the judge. I truly believe that Judge Whitaker is now leaning to mistrial. I think she'll try to avoid it, but if the behavior continues, I think she'll pull the trigger.
I really hope she does!! This is ridiculous and inexcusable at this point! Love is rude incompetent unethical and has wayyyyyy too much attitude for being so corrupt and wrong all the time!! This poor jury! I would have lost literally EVERYTHING by now!!! Love is a disgrace and should be mortified by her behavior and actions during this “trial”!!! I’m starting to get mad at the judge too because she’s allowing it and ruling in Loves favor constantly and letting her get away with this mess. This is an utter disgrace to our justice system!!! I’m sorry my blood is boiling at Loves attitude and the judge continuing this sham. Lol. But yea I hope you’re right!!!
DA Love has done this so many times!!! Over and over, I mean she has been told, and DA Love keeps doing it. That is why this judge is pissed off because she is giving her so many chances and she keeps playing this game.
Same. It gets me wayyy too worked up and frustrated. I literally can’t with Love and the judge allowing this sham to continue. It’s like I’ll check in every few videos on it of Peter’s. Lol!
You know how police officers will just gradually wear a suspect down until they finally get a confession, no matter the facts, and that's how we end up with all these false confessions? Maybe the prosecutor Love is employing a similar strategy. At this point, I just feel bad for the jury in this trial. And I don't know what I would do if it were me in that jury box for the last like year now and all this shit is going on and kinda up-pending my life. I'd be willing to say ANY verdict that gets me the fuck out of this case for good and that alone is scary.
The only unprofessionalism i have seen comes from the state and they've absolutely been disgusting especially in the jurors presence AND TOWARD THE JUDGE respectfully
Love is bringing up any & all info & statements. Where did she get her law degree? How is this not prosecutorial misconduct by now, it's pathetic. Im all for fair trial's & guilty verdicts but I would not give a guilty verdict based on how the state have handed out plea deals, immunity & whatever else they've done in this case. I agree with the judge being more firm handed, but she needs to lay down the law bc its obvious that the state don't know it. If i were on the jury id be sending notes to the court. This needs to be thrown out, period.
The problem with the Judge “correcting” things is her giving the jury an instruction to forget what they heard. Imagine being told a story for over a year in the manner this one is being told and at least 20 times you are told to forget that part. Are the jurors brilliant legal scholars? How in the world does a court expect the average person to decide a persons life based on this!! Jurors need to send a message! Come back with everything not guilty in record time to show the DA office how dare you bring a case like this.
Miss. Love gives off negative vibes, it’s not about her being smooth or not, she has a evil sprite with her because everyone that were supposed to be a gang member was taken advantage of because they didn’t have money nor can the read or write.. this is what’s going on in this case. No one of the defense team trusts her or DA. Hilton
Love recalls witnesses because she doesn’t want all of what they know to come out at one time. She uses them to organize when the info the witness can provide comes out.
IMO, this was all a big show by Judge Whitaker. She might as well winked at Ms Love. This trial will continue unfortunately. I wish the jury was aware of all Ms Love’s shenanigans 🤮🐍
They are bringing witnesses that were cancelled,just because defence refused to stipulate to chain of custody ( judge begg them) but they refused,after they told the judge that it was too long and to many witnesses,judge told them you are asking for more witnesses by refusing to stipulate the interrogation of witnesses??
Replay crew. The prosecutor is inept at the very least. There’s no excuse for her to continually mislead the court and withhold evidence as if it was just discovered 6 minutes ago. She’s wasting taxpayer monies. The judge is giving her way too many breaks. I never thought I’d say this - Lally is a rockstar compared to Love. If I was a juror in this case, I would be very confused.
23:47 QQQ could it be considered PREJUDICE if - bc of the v late disclosure during trial - dealing with a large volume of new evidence interferes with defense's prep for ongoing & upcoming witnesses, motions, & other evidentiary issues they're already dealing with??? 🌻
I was in court today and boy! She is frustrating. This case is moving at a tortoise speed because Love is not concise nor organized. She fights EVERY SINGLE OBJECTION. I mean every single objection. She cannot pivot and move on. She can’t concede ANYTHING. There is no end in sight because she is focusing on so many irrelevant details and the judge will not restrict her. The freaking jury is making $25 a day!! My life would be in shambles. Free this jury. Free these young men. Charge folks for the crimes THEY COMMITTED if there is evidence and move on!
Well said 👏🏾
Absolutely!!
Agreed 😂
Absolutely 💯 agree it's bananas 🍌 tbh drives me nuts the circles she talks in .Wild
The objections she fights are gratuitous and ridiculous. That's why most of them are getting overruled. The defenses only strategy has been spamming objections and motions with thus ongoing tone like everybody is corrupt except their clients. It's crazy to me that every comment section is throwing all that negative energy at Love for just doing her job. But nothing is said about old ladies getting shot, amother getting carjacked with her daughter in her car, Thug teaching a toddler how to stack Blood signs, the shootings, the drug sales out of the gas station etc etc. The way you all look over all the overwhelming evidence against YSL but demonize this black woman is absolutely sickening
Here's where i disagree: if the prosecution can systemstically disobey the judge, violate brady, and turn in discovery late, then how is the trial fair?
It not. 99 percent of you tube laywers make excuses for judges. Also, after reprimanding her the judge went right back to ruling everything in her favor
The state knows they’re losing this case, a mistrial would probably be the best for them right now just so they could retry it and not have 2 ways to losing. One being not guilty or 2 on appeal.
Have you watched the video? Peter says *several* times that he believes the cumulative actions of the prosecution team have gone past the point of a fair trial.
@@jaysonsorensen594yup and that’s why a lot of people just don’t trust lawyers at all. If I’m ur client and u think what this judge is doing is okay .. ur gone buddy. Ineffective counsel imo if this is how these lawyers really feel and think
@@jaysonsorensen594I knew she would. I said Loves gonna have a great day tomorrow cause Judge will go overboard to side with her. And she absolutely did and Let her talk back, Make snide remarks and give attitude .. in return judge snapped on the defense.. it’s disgusting!
I really like when you have your dad on. his depth and breadth of knowledge is helpful, and I like hearing from his viewpoint. thanks, guys!
edit: Im sorry but MR SPRINKLES IS SENDING MEEEEEE 🐱
I agree! He’s like a bank full of knowledge! And I’m jus left wanting more! I wish we could get a good 2-3 hours of conversation! Like a podcast setting!
Mr Sprinkle the forensic data guy is essential a girlfriend doing a deep dive on an ex boyfriend's social website and snooping through phone itimised phone bills 🤣
I love the way he goes into minute details about everything with elite vocabulary and an air of superiority for the peons.
I appreciate him fully 😂
Man I totally get it- I get that appellate courts don’t like mistrials based on all this ‘other procedural stuff’ but resolutions based on facts- but these procedures are in place to get the right FACTS. The most reliable truth. The closest to the truth that we can get. Prosecutors railroad the process of uncovering the facts in the case that they’ve brought, this ain’t a search for the truth and this should be OVER.
Peter! Im shocked you are amazing at giving the benefit of the doubt, but I completely agree with Big George! The Judge feels she was outright lied to and she was!
Exactly what your dad said. She hasn’t prepared her prosecution.
She is used to prosecuting like this which is so scary
I agree with your Dad, Peter, that this attorney lied/lies on purpose. I believe Love and the other female assistant prosecutor are grossly incompetent, do not know what they are doing and are willing to work around in any fashion they can to win this case/these cases. I am so confused at this point and I can usually keep up with what is being asked/said during the trials we watch.
I think the DA prosecutors are rookies.
@@lelitaarano810I think they're dirty
Hopefully! someone is getting to the bottom of what’s going on in that county.
Peter I respect and appreciate your work. The impatience toward your father which I see you trying to control, is off putting. His words are wise and appreciated.
I cannot love this enough. Peter is good for speculation but just roll the film, when it's already happened.
I TOTALLY AGREE!!
I don’t see that at all. Peter is fair and calm and patient. I think he appreciates his dad’s wisdom and input. Y’all are reading the room wrong.
@@carlaamanda86 She isn't wrong. You must be new here. This video is actually one of his better ones and so I don't think this one is that bad. But, there are plenty where I wanted to jump through the phone. But, I don't think this video particularly was a bad one.
We love when your dad comes on so we can hear his thoughts and knowledge. I don’t know if you will see this after the stream but tell him thank you for doing this
I am a sucker for children and parents on social media. Regardless if it is something like this, or just watching videos together and doing little reaction ones, or silly little challenges. They always make me smile. Even if our parents can drive us crazy (mine sends me Dad jokes all day long).
I really enjoy your dad being on. So much respect for him and your family. Love hearing the takes on this. The State in this case is wild.
So … my experience in the business world is, if any of my employees did their jobs as poorly as the prosecutors are doing theirs here, I would fire them. That simple. It’s inexcusable as far as I’m concerned. This is truly unbelievable and shakes my confidence in our judicial system. This is BAD!
That part!!!!
The judge has been TRAINING & TEACHING the prosecutor how to perform her duty as a prosecutor.
Thank you for all your hard work. I appreciate all the extra lives and updates. I'm a prosecutor in Alabama but was in private practice for 25 years, and I know how many hours you must be putting in. You do such a great job juggling everything. It is much appreciated,. I loved the podcast with your wife. Tell her she is a natural.
Can you explain why this judge interrupts & gives an interpretation of what the State's theory and/or is? I don't see other judges doing this. I really have a hard time understanding her judging techniques. Thank you.
She flat out lied, and did so after weeks of the judge asking her to be more forthright. The judge asks for professionalism and candor and Love plays games as a regular business practice.
Then, she LITERALLY started off today with more lies.
I still can't wrap my mind around how the jury survives this long of a trial! How do they support their families during such a lengthy service? I would never be able to stay afloat financially if I had to serve on this jury
Your job is protected while you serve on a jury.
Some companies pay full salaries during jury service. It’s a job benefit.
@@twerk5954your job is protected, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re making money while on jury duty. My company will only cover a week
Honestly I have no idea. Even with their jobs being “protected” they have $0 income currently, even if they have a partner bringing in money too that’s a HUGE drop in income. It’s insane.
The state should definitely pay them a bonus if a trial goes beyond 3 months.
Doing your civic duty should not be at the detriment of a tax payers life, especially since they are also paying for the trial itself.
I got roped into this case during the Glanville/Steele fiasco but haven’t been able to stop following since because of the continued slow-motion trainwreck spectacle. I need these LYK updates to synthesize how to process all of this!
"Prior preparation prevents poor performance" Judge Glanville to Love the message was missed.
The bottom line is she's trying to be slick and outsmart others!
Of course all 3 of the witnesses said they can't remember what they told detectives. It was 9-10 years ago, and lies are hard to remember.
And also, I hate to say it, but these guys are low intelligence and ignorant. It is what it is. They can barely grasp what is being asked, especially when Love is being sly and sneaky with her questions.
This is the worst trial ever
Thug requested a speedy trial which they didn't think he would do.... the result is Chaos🤣🤣🤣
How many times can a Judge ask the Jury to "forget something" before it's too much and she just declares a mistrial?
If I was on the jury, there is no way I could forget something I already heard. SMH The judge is giving the prosecution too many chances.
See, that is sadly the one thing that I don't have a hard time with on this. The length of the trial works in favor of that and the things they are supposed to forget are not helping the State. Who if I am on that jury, I am blaming right now because it is still their case in chief. (edit: I meant state not defense, and if you read what I wrote I say that I am blaming them because it is still their case!)
@@CatInWonderlands Once a bell is rung you can't unring it. No chance this is a fair trial and the verdict will stand if found guilty.
And the jury has been there the last 11 months as the Prosecutors question witnesses for days on end until the Judge sustains the defence's 403 objection. Why would the jury blame the defence for the prosecutors lack of competence? What are you talking about? Also it's the State presenting their case. The defence hasn't even started their case or called their first witness. Do you know how trials work? It's the State currently putting on their "case in chief" if you want to use that phrase to sound technical.
@@declan92100 Yes, I have seen plenty of trials. I will admit I had a typo (I was trying to beat the stupid commercials that erase comments). However if you actually read the rest of what I wrote rather than going on the attack, I said that I would be blaming the one who's case it was and specifically cited the case in chief, which you actually cited in your attack on me. I don't disagree that this case won't stand on appeal if found guilty. But my point is that there are a ton of people saying all kinds of things, not understanding that there is a lot of things that are actually rather reasonable or within the law that every single how people claim should be a reason for mistrial, and it doesn't come close to the legal burden. I am not a Free Thug person, I am a constitutional law person.
The length of this is not working on the State's behalf, and I would from the perspective of the jury be very unhappy about that. I would hold it against the state because it is very clear that it is still their presentation. Which is something that is explained and was explained here in this case in opening statements.
I would have no problems forgetting things that I need to forget, because it has been going on for 11 months. Which is at this point something that is in favor of the defense and not in favor of the state as what is being asked of them to forget is all things that were beneficial to the state. Except maybe the line about Garlington's auntie and Gaither, which was proper hearsay.
@@CatInWonderlands I wasn't "attacking" you.. You commented on my post and said the jury would be frustrated by the Defence as they are putting on their case and i corrected you as they haven't begun their case and it's already been the longest trial in the state of Georgia's history (Ms Love still wants to call 50+ witnesses and asked for permission to call them back a second or third time if needed as she didn't have the files to the defence in time to question Gaither that day).
And it's completely unreasonable to tell 12 people to have selective memory multiple times.. No idea how you think a Judge telling the Jury automatically wipes their memory, or they are even going to follow the instruction and not carry a bias through the trial.
Yes plenty of people are supporting the constant calls for a Mistrial, but even the Judge has said twice in the last week she doesn't think they're doing it intentionally but the State is coming extremely close to crossing the line. And admonished Ms Love after they had a sidebar where Ms Love said she would get rid of the comments on an IG post. Then left the comments on the post and started questioning Gaither about them. Then when confronted tried to claim she thought the Judge just meant "remove the comments, but as this was a phone number it doesn't count" before the Judge shot her down completely and said the Phone number is in the comments and that was baffling she would misrepresent information to the Judge like that..
She lied. Love said she thought because the phone number was numbers not words and since the objection was about comments and comments just meant the words, questions about the phone number were good. The phone number is in the comments, part of the comments. She is being purposely dense. Slippery and disingenuous.
On one hand, that was a pathetic explanation. On the other hand you have to have ZERO ethics to try to pull that off.
Exactly and Love has ZEROOOOO ETHICS. It’s enraging!!! Like how can the judge not see this?! It’s time for this to be OVERRRRRR.
It’s just ridiculous and frustrating. And it’s never going to end. They have absolutely proven nothing
Just that you can prove RICO by what emojis on social media you use with your friends. Lol
The state's case appears more like an investigation than a case against the defendants.
Big George morphed into Papa Tragos with his “She doesn’t think like us” musings. ❤
A prosecutor that is not prepared to this extent shouldn’t be a prosecutor.
The saddest is the jury checked out months ago, and they're stuck there for another year. Verdict in 20 minutes
😂
I can’t believe the jury hasn’t mutinied and just refused to show up.
I agree, but I hope that doesn’t happen. It would be a shameful waste and mistrial that could be retried.
They called the ADA to explain why they charged 4 other people for M and then dropped those, gave immunity to them to testify and then charged others 9 years later. That’s why Steele wanted to get into work product.
At 21:44 Banger of a line. Defense Lawyer: That's seems to be my role in this case, to complain about late discovery
I love when your dad is on!! Can he do a podcast telling stories of all the times he’s been yelled out by a judge. I LOVE hearing his stories.!!
How can the defense put on a case if Love is cutting of defense just talking no objection. Now wants defense to hurry up.
The entire jury should just get up and leave. They can never get their time back. It's ridiculous
I love you two commenting together. One of the most fair and balanced commentary’s available. Thank You!
Sir, this is a blowup from today if you go back and look, Miss LOVE is wearing a yellow highlighter color and once again the judge does the same thing and she is literally cutting the judge off and will not shut up!!!! DA learned from Fanni Willis!!! Unreal that Georgia allows this to be an example to the world. What a total incomplete disgrace the DAs office and also a lot of these judges in Georgia. It is so disgusting!!
The judge was absolutely flat out lied too Mrs Love knew she couldn't get it in under objection so she tried to take a short cut thinking the courts and defense was to slow to catch it she's done it time and time again
Some of us believe that love was messaging him from her laptop because she kept moving it around and hiding the screen
Wouldn’t surprise me in the least she is so unethical!!
I know you tell people to get in the comments and talk about cases your audience wants to hear about. I would love to hear your breakdown of today's preliminary hearing of the Kentucky sheriff who killed the judge in his chambers. If what the defense is trying to present is true (the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter) and the sheriff has a severe emotional response, how do you see this case going?
That's a interesting event! Sounds like everyone in town knew what was going on. Dad took charge!
Not true. The sheriff’s wife has made a statement that their daughter has not been abused by anyone. The case lead detective said the sheriff made the statement “they are trying to kidnap my wife and daughter”. Don’t know what that means though
@@crimenurse8264 I like to think I do a very good job of phrasing my language in a qualified manner. And it really ruffles my feathers when I see somebody just say all this stuff that I have qualified is not true. What makes you the arbiter of truth?
If I had a daughter in high school, and it was alleged that she was being statutoried by a 50 year old man, and as a result her father/my husband went and killed that man, and that man just happens to be a judge, and the dad/husband happens to be a sheriff, and as a result this case gets national news, and to top it all off the moment in question is on camera, my FIRST priority is going to be that daughter. Holy crap, they need to pull her from school. I hope her name never gets out there or this will stick with her the rest of her life. Whether it is true or not, I would pray the mother comes out and says it isn't true for the sake of her daughter. At least til she gets out of high school. Hell, maybe it is true and the daughter is lying to her mom. We don't know. Qualify your statements.
You heard (or maybe you missed it) the state trooper say that the sheriff was sitting, using the judge's phone trying to contact his own daughter, stood up, and that is when the clip we saw in court was presented with the shooting. It certainly seems possible he saw something about his daughter that drew him to emotional distress. Did the police question the wife? No (or at least not reported). Did they seem at all interested in the allegations regarding the past deputy's conduct and the alleged cover up? Not to me. There is certainly enough evidence for one to acknowledge and maybe even believe the defense's allegations against the judge are likely to be true. And having somebody just say "No" as though it is a final decision and gospel makes my blood boil.
Does anyone...including the jury....even know who is charged with what anymore? This case is so chaotic. There is no story to follow, its all over the place and there is no way the jury knows whats happening.
Agreed. There’s at least 3-4 people on this indictment facing life in prison that we haven’t even heard of or found evidence on yet. It just doesn’t make sense
When Peter said he didn't know what Love was talking about cause she talked in circles... I felt that. Offputting. Thanks for your commentary, which helps with clarity. I feel for the jury...their lives and livelihood have been put on hold with no end in sight. At this point they are in jury jail. Awful.
When your dad is a guest, I find it so heartwarming. I can feel how proud he is of you. The love and respect to each other is palpiable. This is what love, respect and patience between a Father and son looks like. ❤
On one of the other channels that I watch there are several of us discussing that a witness that has already been called is most likely the one that did the crime and the state gave him immunity because they wanted Thug
Around 56:00 they were talking around her, like she wasn't even there! Reminded me of a parent-teacher conference, and not a good one!
Can you imagine being a juror on this case!? Being shuffled in and out constantly, endless instruction (exclusions) on what has been testified to, and the amount of time off. There is nothing but reasonable doubt every single day. I've watched this from day one and I've completely lost sight of what the crime is at this point. There is no way that a jury can possibly consider all of the evidence and make a decision. Deliberations will be a total shit show!
Love makes an excuse for the new photos because of witnesses they are having to put back on the list because of the defense's objections. But if the witnesses were already on the list previously, why were the photos not?
Lying Love!!
When is someone more higher up than this judge going to step in and say enough is enough of this nonsense! It’s absolutely wild to me that they haven’t called a miss trial yet. This trial is off its rocker and it continues to be a waste of the jurors time! If it doesn’t get declared a miss trial, it’s going to get thrown out on appeal so let’s just stop wasting jurors time already. 🎪 This has turned into a circus!
It should all be dismissed. A mistrial will keep them in jail because I doubt they’ll allow them out on bond because it’s been denied so many times.
Her boss was the previous judge. 🙃
This isnt politics. I'm a Dem and beyond frustrated with Fulton county.
yes but dems aren't leftists they're liberals and basically the same as conservatives besides they pretend to not hate "the blacks" or "the gays" as much and are sometimes OK with abortion. People from other countries agree, US as two rightwing parties
I’m libertarian with right leaning tendencies on policy, and this is the fault of both sides.
Yes, Fani is using this case to springboard herself in the political sphere (whether that be to continue as DA or in some other capacity) and continuing this farce with a weak case and a prosecutor that is inept/corrupt, however Fani is using law that a right majority legislature codified with evidence rules exceptions carved out like crazy so the people on the right can say “we’re tough on crime!”
The fact that one side cheers on the loss of freedom because they can only see it effecting the other side is how we have made it this far down this path so far, and how long until people are willing to wake up and reverse course and defend freedoms and rights even for those they oppose will dictate how far down this path we go….
And I bet you still vote for Kamala which says it all
@@reidger7778and you’re too ignorant to figure out it’s not a republican/democrat issue. Trumpers really are some of the densest people on the planet…
@reidger7778 you're voting for a fascist lmao
Love is a little corrupt and unethical and a lot inept. Terrible combination
Not just a little!! A WHOLE LOT corrupt!
Well she sucks at being corrupt then bc nobody is buying it. Shes blowing everybody's cover
What about her switching the evidence (picture) from what was approved to another picture on the sly? That is never okay, right? I'd love to hear your thoughts on that. I'm shocked and disgusted by Love's behavior.
I saw that!
The prosecution is terrible. The look on two good lawyers’ faces while the judge is raking the prosecutor over the coals was priceless.
I would HATE to be on this jury. I'd want my work laptop to get stuff done while sitting around. They must be getting through so many books! 📚 since they can't have any electronic devices
Replay crew. So, I’m going to disagree with Papa here. The prosecutor is inept at the very least. There’s no excuse for her to continually mislead the court and withhold evidence as if it was just discovered 6 minutes ago. She’s wasting taxpayer monies. The judge is giving her way too many breaks.
If I was a juror in this case, I would be very confused.
I'm confused by it all and Peter has explained it! It's just word salad and hard to follow
I agree completely! I have watched every single day of this travesty. She’s incompetent and unethical.
The prosecution is shady. Love doesn’t stop arguing when the judge rules against her. She sneaks things in and pretends she didn’t realize it wasn’t allowed. She takes up so much time saying the same things over and over.
I’d be Pissed And confused after this long.
She's disingenuous
When you were discussing the Brady list I kept thinking “like when an officer is Giglio’d?”. Fairly certain that’s the same thing!
I am so excited about this. I’ve been dying to hear Mr. George’s take! Thank you!!!
Please, keep up with this trial and do longer in depth videos/updates!!! I love your guys commentary ❤
Love it when yall cover YSL, do wish it was done more!!!
This trial hardly inspires confidence in the American system of justice. So what percentage of criminal trials are train wrecks like this one? I can only hope that it’s a fraction of 1%, but I’m a dreamer.
Before trials were broadcasted people would never fathom this happened in courts.
WOW! So glad they found a judge who TOLD THE TRUTH to the prosection.
I’ve been watching this trial daily including the full days of litigation over evidence while jury has the day off. The prosecutor has told several obvious lies, has been disrespectful to the judge, and argues relentlessly every time a ruling doesn’t go her way
Yup!!! Her attitude is wilddddd. She’s in the wrong but has the most crazy attitude!! It’s infuriating!!
Will you cover the sheriff that shot the judge in Kentucky?
Ooh where can I find this? Did it just happen or is it about to go to trial?
@@kimmcmillan2873 It happened in September. There was just a pretrial hearing today to see if there was plausible cause for murder charges. The rumor going round is that the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter. Sheriff met with the judge in his chambers, tried to call his daughter on his phone, took the judge's phone (this process apparently was not violent, judge seemed to cooperate in giving his phone to sheriff), sheriff then tried calling his daughter from judge's phone. Immediately afterwards he shoots the judge, wounds him, judge crawls under his desk, sheriff moved around the desk and shoots him again. Then as sheriff is leaving he shoots the judge a couple more times. Then sheriff turned himself in.
It isn't going to trial for a long time. When the sheriff was taken into custody he apparently said something about, "They're taking his wife and daughter." This has caused some to very quickly begin saying the sheriff may have been violent towards his family, and the judge was helping them. I am not so sure about this though. The police and defense (who know the sheriff's side of the story) are talking to the daughter. Not the wife. The sheriff grew in a fury when he called his daughter, and seemingly did not try to contact his wife.
@@kimmcmillan2873 This happened in September. There was a pretrial hearing today to find probable cause for murder. According to the rumor mill, the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter. At today's hearing they actually showed the shooting. The judge was shot and wounded, crawled under his desk, the sheriff moved around the room to continue shooting the judge, then as the sheriff opened the door to leave he leaned down and fired at the judge again.
What they did not show in the footage is what happened immediately before this. Apparently the judge and sheriff met in chambers to discuss something, the sheriff called his daughter on his cellphone, the judge then handed his phone over to the sheriff (so far no evidence has been presented that the sheriff violently took the phone, and reports are that the exchange appeared voluntary), and the sheriff tried calling his own daughter from the judge's phone. Whatever happened put the sheriff in a rage and that is when the footage presented by the prosecution actually starts.
When the sheriff voluntarily went into custody, he said something like, "They are trying to take my wife and kid." This has led some to believe that the sheriff was abusive to his family, and the judge was helping them get out of the sheriff's orbit. I don't think this claim holds much substance yet. The sheriff apparently only tried contacting his daughter on his phone and the judge's phone. The police are focusing more on the daughter, and seemingly not on the wife. I am not sure what to make of the sheriff's exclamation, but the judge helping them escape an abusive home does not click for me
@@kimmcmillan2873 This happened in September. There was a pretrial hearing today to find probable cause for murder. According to the rumor mill, the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter. At today's hearing they actually showed the shooting. The judge was shot and wounded, crawled under his desk, the sheriff moved around the room to continue shooting the judge, then as the sheriff opened the door to leave he leaned down and fired at the judge again.
What they did not show in the footage is what happened immediately before this. Apparently the judge and sheriff met in chambers to discuss something, the sheriff called his daughter on his cellphone, the judge then handed his phone over to the sheriff (so far no evidence has been presented that the sheriff violently took the phone, and reports are that the exchange appeared voluntary), and the sheriff tried calling his own daughter from the judge's phone. Whatever happened put the sheriff in a rage and that is when the footage presented by the prosecution actually starts.
When the sheriff voluntarily went into custody, he said something like, "They are trying to take my wife and kid." This has led some to believe that the sheriff was abusive to his family, and the judge was helping them get out of the sheriff's orbit. I don't think this claim holds much substance yet. The sheriff apparently only tried contacting his daughter on his phone and the judge's phone. The police are focusing more on the daughter, and seemingly not on the wife. I am not sure what to make of the sheriff's exclamation, but the judge helping them escape an abusive home does not click for me
This happened in September. There was a pretrial hearing today to find probable cause for murder. According to the rumor mill, the judge was allegedly statutorying the sheriff's daughter. At today's hearing they actually showed the shooting. The judge was shot and wounded, crawled under his desk, the sheriff moved around the room to continue shooting the judge, then as the sheriff opened the door to leave he leaned down and fired at the judge again.
What they did not show in the footage is what happened immediately before this. Apparently the judge and sheriff met in chambers to discuss something, the sheriff called his daughter on his cellphone, the judge then handed his phone over to the sheriff (so far no evidence has been presented that the sheriff violently took the phone, and reports are that the exchange appeared voluntary), and the sheriff tried calling his own daughter from the judge's phone. Whatever happened put the sheriff in a rage and that is when the footage presented by the prosecution actually starts.
When the sheriff voluntarily went into custody, he said something like, "They are trying to take my wife and kid." This has led some to believe that the sheriff was abusive to his family, and the judge was helping them get out of the sheriff's orbit. I don't think this claim holds much substance yet. The sheriff apparently only tried contacting his daughter on his phone and the judge's phone. The police are focusing more on the daughter, and seemingly not on the wife. I am not sure what to make of the sheriff's exclamation, but the judge helping them escape an abusive home does not click for me
48:56 I have been watching all of this case. Love has had multiple Brady violations, Love has demonstrated on multiple occasions she is shady, and this should have gone to mistrial with prejudice. It’s wild. It’s funny watching you all who are actual lawyers being mindblown cause us non-lawyers see it and are like WTF. Fani and the DA office is so corrupt. You should watch Ashlee dealing with trying to get records.
This case should have been thrown out by now. This isn't incompetence, this is being done on purpose, which steps all over the defendant's rights.
Thank you Peter and Papa Tragos for continuing to discuss the YSL trial with all of us! 💗 This trial is really starting to feel like the movie Groundhog Day at this point.
Definitely Groundhog Day. She takes 1 step forward and 10 steps back and wants to start over again.
1:03:11 and he’s answering questions from almost 10 yrs… and they ask.. do you need to refer to your notes” putting it on record
What I've learned from this trial is I don't have enough patience to be judge because this would be beyond frustrating to me
❤️ Thank you Pops & Peter for your review on all of these cases!! ⭐✨
As someone who has been watching this and can go back and rewatch, and have, I can not even fathom how confused the jury is. It’s like watching me try to clean my house without taking my adhd meds… lawd.. can you say “squirrel”??
I’ve heard some GA defense lawyers say the trial is the punishment and that’s been the purpose of this.
Well why are we ALL being punished?!
Peter, it's exactly what your father said. SHE thinks she's winning, and she thinks hiding her hand and being sneaky furthers her case. And she does keep getting away with it!
Mark this day, DAY 138. This is the day Ms. Love broke the judge. I truly believe that Judge Whitaker is now leaning to mistrial. I think she'll try to avoid it, but if the behavior continues, I think she'll pull the trigger.
I really hope she does!! This is ridiculous and inexcusable at this point! Love is rude incompetent unethical and has wayyyyyy too much attitude for being so corrupt and wrong all the time!! This poor jury! I would have lost literally EVERYTHING by now!!! Love is a disgrace and should be mortified by her behavior and actions during this “trial”!!! I’m starting to get mad at the judge too because she’s allowing it and ruling in Loves favor constantly and letting her get away with this mess. This is an utter disgrace to our justice system!!! I’m sorry my blood is boiling at Loves attitude and the judge continuing this sham. Lol. But yea I hope you’re right!!!
Need the rust judge to come over here and show this judge how to dismiss a case
That part!!!
Awesome to see LYK learn something new in real time. 👍
However, yes, the Brady list is used very often.
FINALLY!! Thrilled to see a Judge in this case hold the Prosecution accountable (in some manner).
FREE the JURY!!!
😂 it’s become a full time job for them. I hope they get paid more than the usual daily pay for jurors.
DA Love has done this so many times!!! Over and over, I mean she has been told, and DA Love keeps doing it. That is why this judge is pissed off because she is giving her so many chances and she keeps playing this game.
Right when I was watching this live I legit said outloud "ohhh man. I can't wait for poppa Ts input!!"
This case I dip in and out of, mainly out, it’s soul destroying. ❤ love you content Peter much love to Papa. Xx
Same. It gets me wayyy too worked up and frustrated. I literally can’t with Love and the judge allowing this sham to continue. It’s like I’ll check in every few videos on it of Peter’s. Lol!
@@carlaamanda86 oh I am with you all the way grr lol 🫂
I love the discussion between you & your Dad. So interesting!
Omg 😂 that was great , but that deserved a mistrial honestly , Ms love like arguing and breaking rules
What a MESS! Yes, you can call me Captain Obvious 😅
So glad you broke this down.
Just do not understand how this trail can go on. 139 days in with incompetent DA. I see mistrial. What a circus.
What an embarrassment, waste of money and waste of jurors time.
You know how police officers will just gradually wear a suspect down until they finally get a confession, no matter the facts, and that's how we end up with all these false confessions? Maybe the prosecutor Love is employing a similar strategy. At this point, I just feel bad for the jury in this trial. And I don't know what I would do if it were me in that jury box for the last like year now and all this shit is going on and kinda up-pending my life. I'd be willing to say ANY verdict that gets me the fuck out of this case for good and that alone is scary.
The only unprofessionalism i have seen comes from the state and they've absolutely been disgusting especially in the jurors presence AND TOWARD THE JUDGE respectfully
Love is bringing up any & all info & statements. Where did she get her law degree? How is this not prosecutorial misconduct by now, it's pathetic. Im all for fair trial's & guilty verdicts but I would not give a guilty verdict based on how the state have handed out plea deals, immunity & whatever else they've done in this case. I agree with the judge being more firm handed, but she needs to lay down the law bc its obvious that the state don't know it. If i were on the jury id be sending notes to the court. This needs to be thrown out, period.
prosecutors are presenting a invistigation not a case
Thank you for doing these videos!!!! You are an awesome content creator!!!
The problem with the Judge “correcting” things is her giving the jury an instruction to forget what they heard. Imagine being told a story for over a year in the manner this one is being told and at least 20 times you are told to forget that part. Are the jurors brilliant legal scholars? How in the world does a court expect the average person to decide a persons life based on this!! Jurors need to send a message! Come back with everything not guilty in record time to show the DA office how dare you bring a case like this.
We had a male cat we called Mr. Sprinkles. We had to get him neutered. HE DID NOT LIKE THAT.
Miss. Love gives off negative vibes, it’s not about her being smooth or not, she has a evil sprite with her because everyone that were supposed to be a gang member was taken advantage of because they didn’t have money nor can the read or write.. this is what’s going on in this case. No one of the defense team trusts her or DA. Hilton
Love recalls witnesses because she doesn’t want all of what they know to come out at one time. She uses them to organize when the info the witness can provide comes out.
Great to see Big George again!
Your late to the game.. this has been every day talking brady and late discovery or D A Love just doing whatever she wants
Ms Love is straight up hoping the jury is confused enough to convict
IMO, this was all a big show by Judge Whitaker. She might as well winked at Ms Love. This trial will continue unfortunately. I wish the jury was aware of all Ms Love’s shenanigans 🤮🐍
They are bringing witnesses that were cancelled,just because defence refused to stipulate to chain of custody ( judge begg them) but they refused,after they told the judge that it was too long and to many witnesses,judge told them you are asking for more witnesses by refusing to stipulate the interrogation of witnesses??
Replay crew. The prosecutor is inept at the very least. There’s no excuse for her to continually mislead the court and withhold evidence as if it was just discovered 6 minutes ago. She’s wasting taxpayer monies. The judge is giving her way too many breaks.
I never thought I’d say this - Lally is a rockstar compared to Love.
If I was a juror in this case, I would be very confused.
To quote EDB sometimes I miss Elaine.
I know. I’d actually rather listen to Lally than Love. She makes me want to rip my hair out.
23:47 QQQ could it be considered PREJUDICE if - bc of the v late disclosure during trial - dealing with a large volume of new evidence interferes with defense's prep for ongoing & upcoming witnesses, motions, & other evidentiary issues they're already dealing with??? 🌻