I used the GFX System since 5 years, and switched to the 907x 100cfv (i got a 500cm from m grandpa). I totally fell in love with the hasselblad System and with the 907x Beauty. It is my only Camera System which i also use for private, kids, coffee or travel. I use the 38 and 55 and find the AF System fast enough also for my kids. The X2D is technically a better camera but it has not the spirit and the form factor of the 907x. Love your videos!! Greetings from Germany
Benj... spot on. X2D is a rational choice with IBIS, Weathersealing, EVF, portrait or landscape - no issue, easy tripod mount, versatility. The 907X is like the M11 - a different experience for the joy of photography. The other comparison is M11 vs 907x or SL3 vs X2D. Color science in particular would be very interesting comparison.
This is me, I decided to use the Leica M system for a different experience. Now I have the best of both worlds with the versatility of size and image quality.
The 907 looks gorgeous. You know that meme when the husband is turned over and the wife is wondering what he’s thinking about - that’s me thinking about the 907. The only thing that is stopping me from purchasing it is that I live in Alaska and the lack of weather sealing is too worrisome to put that kind of cash down. If Hasselblad makes a new version - no other changes besides being more durable- that’s my next purchase.
the reality of owning the camera doesn't match up to the expectations, unfortunately... Not having a viewfinder is really limiting especially in bad light. Turns out to be a non-starter for adapting lens. (amazing files, of course, with the native lens)
I can help. As Pros these little beauties have been our cameras of choice since they released the X1d and thie 907x50c- and we have followed the upgrade path diligently - thanks to Clifton Cameras UK - the 907xCFV100c - cannot do 400mp like its bigger sister - (no IBIS) but that is not its strength - I often use it on a salon stand looking down - or underneath looking up - I can use it one handed, it is great for high angle shots handheld - but still that it is not its greatest strength, It hooks onto the back of any Hass Film camera from 1959 onwards - but still there is one thing it does better than anything else and it is not even the fact that on a tripod it becomes invisible at waist level so you can concentrate on your subjects. Nope it's greatest strength is that it looks cool. We have 2 X2D's and only 1 907x and if I can this is the one I take -Can't wait to see your comparison good luck
While I absolutely love the 907X for its design, I still think that the X2D is a much more practical camera for most people due to IBIS. I own the X2D and couldn’t be happier with it.
My set-up: Hasselblad X2D with various HC lenses, Leica M11/(2022)M6 pretty much covers everything. If I need Med film I use H1 system. I like the Leica M system as my compact go anywhere character image quality driven cameras and Hasselblad's when doing portraits/landscapes/lowlight work.
หลายเดือนก่อน
Absolutely stunning camera, the control grip is a must have.
Ah, the dilemma of only being able to to choose. one. I am still torn between heart and brain. In the meanwhile I have the X1D II with the set of P lenses (28, 45, and 75) to soothe my soul. The one thing that you said was new for me is thinking of putting the 907x in your camera bag as you would do a lens. Considerble space is saved. Still IBIS and EVF calls loudly. I started with old film cameras and that taught me a lot about having good photographic technique. So maybe, IBIS and EVF may not win out. Ah, decisions, decisions! Just too much temptation both have pluses and minuses. A good whiskey may be the solution. 🙂
A Sophie's Choice. I have the X2D and I think it is the better choice for me despite the charm of the 907. As for image, the X2D is The Chieftain o' the Image Clan hands down. I have the Q3 43. Not even close. I have some old CCD M bodies with nice old retro lenses. The X2D is always the best. I wonder why I even charge the batteries for the others. Great review.
Love how usable and portable the x2d is among with is ibis. For on my pocket vs my gfx. The x2d stealthily made its way into more cathedrals and other sensitive locations. The 907 "looks" great and it's smaller width is super appealing. L
I think your comment nails it - head says X2D and heart says 907x. The argument for the 907x being good in the studio is lessened by the new X2D firmware allowing for multishot mode because of IBIS - if Hasselblad figures out how to allow multishot without tethering in the X2D it will be amazing for landscape as well. But I just love the size and feel of using the 907x and miss it even though I have the X2D. Perhaps I'll pick up a used 907x 50c - its a lot cheaper, and since the 100c doesn't have IBIS anyway, the difference between the old and new 907x doesn't feel as dramatic as the difference between the X2D and the X1D mkII.
Benj Wonderful insight between these two cameras...all things aside..aesthetically the edge for me would go vote for the 907x plus its more minimal form factor...Yes totally get the X2D can be seen as an all around workhorse for shoots..but again the look of the 907x does harp back to the analog days especially when it is paired with the 500cm..wow!..the 907x is definitely more of a conversation piece bc of its look....did you find people going up to you and asking what it is?..lol
Thank you for this comparison! I totally agree to the brain/heart decision making and went for the 907X. Just one question: I want to use my Peak Design anchors on it, too. Where did you find the adapters you are using?
the only digital cameras I dream having but I didn't see a single Belgian (not sure if a European even) youtube getting this camera their color system is really so good, they look amazing gosh... .if I ever win the lottery I won't tell anyone, but there will be signs
Ngl i would run the X2D anyday. Own practically all the hasselblad stuff since the 907x 50c and even used the 500cm with the CFV original back. Lemme explain. The 907x is more of a (fun over practicality) camera with the screen being smaller and having lesser buttons. Its fun but i will never use it for any of my shoots, when i was in australia for my studies, this was the camera i carried and it tend to crash like 40% the time. Perhaps its a early model maybe its cold but it got so bad I had to buy an M11 as my backup camera. The X2D on the other hand is better for prolonged use. Its more comfy to hold especially on heavier lenses like the 80mm and 135mm + 1.7X converter. Plus the IBIS helps alot when doing night shoots when you dont want to push past ISO800 and want the cityline to be bright. But in my opinion, the 907x is best for travel and fun as it is lighter and smaller while the X2D is better for technical use. (Trust me i shot close to 6TB on these 2 systems in the 2 years i owned them)
benj, thoughts on the 907 100 vs. older 50? i know you had the 50 for a bit, curious what your take is on entering this unique form factor with the older 50 model?
Hi Benj. For those with the 907x but without much knowledge of traditional Hasselblad film cameras, is there a Hasselblad film camera and lens combo that you would recommend to use with the 907x that incorporates the traditional Hasselblad waist level viewfinder and provides the nicest shooting experience? Thank you.
Always love your videos!!! Are you getting access to the new 9mm extension tubes? I’m considering picking one up to pair with the 55v and 135mm. I jumped at the opportunity to and am so greatfull to own the x2d and was almost hesitant to sell it foe a gfx100 ii. I’m sooooo glad I didn’t sell it and love my x2d sooo much. I really really hope they update the 4.0 software to enable field multi-shoot. Or tether to phocus mobile 2 or update phocus mobile so I can combine photos in post foe the 400mp images.
How would you say it compares color and fidelity wise to the m11? I've heard people say that the m11 has medium format level fidelity and im extremely happy with mine however Medium format is still smiling at me from time to time. Great Video as always!
I have questions about the quality of the AWB M11, but that is not the main issue here. How are you used to taking pictures and what. As a photographer with 20 years of experience with the M system, I am attracted to the 907 by the ability to shoot the same way as with the M system - from the belly) And the weight of the 907 is comparable to the M system. Although the fast optics of the M are magical and have no competitors.
Great video! Wanted to ask, where did you get the lugs for the 907x? I want to attach peak design anchors to mine, and the lugs on yours seem perfect to do so!
I have used the 907X in light rain & snow without issue, but I’d feel bad recommending that to others. The 55mm f/2.5V is the “must have” lens imo, but I have used the 38/2.5V quite a bit this year as well. Just depends on what focal lengths you gravitate towards.
@@benjhaisch I was going to ask you if you plan on breaking down the lens line up at some point. I have a 500 C/M with the 50mm, 80mm and 180mm lenses, so when I got the 907X, my first thought was to only use native lenses that were wider than the 50, but after about a year of shooting it, I find so much pleasure in using the 907X in it's native format that I am considering more XCD lenses. Focusing on the wide end, I bought the 45P and the 25V at first. I recently picked up the 75P as a "normal" / portrait lens, and so far I am pleased. I am torn about whether the 55V or 38V would be a better everyday lens, though. Since you can crop so deep in the files and still have high resolution images, I am still thinking that either lens would be a great choice.
Hey Benj, I really love your channel and have been following you for a while. I truly miss your Fuji content, but I get why you've gone all in on Hasselblad. Nobody's turning down free high-end gear, especially something as beautiful as that. I know the medium format film photography from Hasselblad is amazing, and the digital system is great in its own way. However, one thing I don't like is that the digital medium format with the lenses in their lineup doesn't give you that true medium format look. Fuji's 1.7 is barely hitting that, and they’re more of a 1.3 look in full-frame terms. Both Fuji and Hasselblad’s digital medium formats lack the true medium format aesthetic unless you're using third-party manual lenses, like from Mitakon or Leica/Voigtländer. But I’m not gonna spend thousands of dollars on a high-end body and then be reduced to shooting with manual-only glass. It would be great if you could talk more about this on your channel and let people know that, yes, these cameras are beautiful and compact, but they’re really giving you more of a 1.9 full-frame look. You can easily get a similar effect with a Canon DSLR and a few prime lenses (like the 28mm f1.8, 50mm f1.4, and 85mm f1.8) and just crop it in Lightroom to a 4:3 aspect ratio. Think about the money you’d save by going that route-money that could be spent on models, makeup, lighting, and other things that bring your creative vision to life. I feel like we're all getting a little brainwashed by these companies. I’m not trying to bash you at all-I absolutely love your channel and find your work really inspiring. Just wanted to share some thoughts. Keep doing what you’re doing!
Hey thanks for the insight. I ended up selling my X-E4 because I just didn’t use it enough to justify and then sold my GFX50S when the 907X came in for the same reason. I feel like Fujifilm had a bit of a slower 2024 release cycle and while I’d love to review all of their things it’s sort of up to my contacts decisions whether I get the new stuff or not. All that to say, I hope their production woes are over and 2025 is a banner year for Fujifilm. I’ve also been less obsessed with the most shallow DOF imaginable as I have been in the past. That said, of course you can get similar looks from much much much more inexpensive gear. It’s all diminishing returns at some point, but I do think that cameras like these do have their place and the flexibility of the files really is amazing. But do 99% of people *need* cameras like these, of course not. Just like no one *needs* a Leica M11, Q3, and most don’t even need a Sony A1 or other flagships. I’m fortunate to do this for a living and also have some opportunities from this channel like this and I’m trying not to take them for granted :)
This is how you do ethical disclosure. I'm thrilled that they gave you the cameras, and trust that it doesn't cloud your judgement. Nice vid! I used to own the 907X 50C. The cold shoe situation was miserable for a tripod queen of a camera - they fixed that with the 100C. The sensor was massive and a total dust magnet, so I wish they would have added a darkslide with the 100C. A lack of even basic weather sealing on an MF camera is also something I find weird. I got the hand grip and my wife correctly asked, "so you got this camera because it's weird and are adding accessories to make it less weird?" I also didn't like the strap wear experience, as the way the camera wanted to lay/bounce depended on the size and weight of the lens. And it ran hot. I ended up selling it and getting an X1D2, but I could see myself going for a 907X 100C and probably couldn't resist with more improvements.
You have different reaction using the 907X but you also find that the people you are shooting have a different reaction to the 907X. Less intimidating?
I had someone else comment that on threads as well. I’ve never taken a side by side photo with each, but I did do a project with both and didn’t notice, but it does make me curious about the shift.
Yep. Own both camers and you have skin color difference between them also the the x2d is doing some kind of DR in camera cuz on M mode the x2d is 0.3-0.4 ev brighter.
Why would they release a back that you can put on their 6x6 film cameras and not have a square sensor? That’s part of the experience with those cameras. Yes you can crop to square but it’s not the same as composing in square. If anyone will release such a sensor I believe Hasselblad can. :-)
@@benjhaisch, I didn't know it would be more expensive to create a square sensor compared to a rectangle. Thank you! Something that doesn't get mentioned a lot when it comes to Medium Format is that with a square sensor (or negative) that aspect ratio tends to really shine when the subjects are centered. The benefit there is your subjects are being placed in the sharpest part of the lens. Although with modern lens design perhaps this isn't as much of an issue as it is with film. What do you think? Thank you for making such great content, Benj! If I ever get married I'm totally going to find a way to book you :-)
It’s less about the ratio and probably more about the size and heat, but then also like anything else, you’d be hitting a smaller market if people who would be able to pay for a full 56x56 sensor, thus making fewer of them and then making it more expensive to produce. They totally *could* do it, it’d be more about size, price, heat, etc imo
Dream Cameras dream setups. Maybe do a comparison against the GFX line of cameras? Maybe not which one’s better but more experience of using them in the differences…. Also Rumor has it Fuji will release, medium format, rangefinder camera with a fixed lens. Thoughts? That would definitely be more economical, and definitely something I would be very interested in.
While there are obviously similarities I almost feel like it’s like comparing the Leica SL3 and the Sony A7RV. They have the same sensor (probably) but the experience is so so different.
I could see that. I mentioned it in the premiere chat, but if they did, I’d only really want them to add a faster processor to accommodate continuous AF tracking and make it much faster. Considering the product cycle of the series, an X2DII would be expected around the end of 2025.
@@astrostl fwiw, for someone like me, I think it makes a lot of sense because these are cameras that I will actually use and will continue to make videos about on my own time/dime anyway. so imo they're going to be getting more than their money's worth here. I wouldn't be able to justify getting this into the system otherwise without selling off a ton of my other tools.
@@benjhaisch for sure. And there are going to be a ton of content creators in the same boat that can *influence* purchases. If an additional 5 units get sold as a result of each, they're probably well into the black.
Having been someone who bought both of these there are some massive operating differences that makes them very far apart in terms of operation. I also just wanted to say something and this is not a reflection of this channel which I have been watching now for sometime but I am absolutely staggered by how many x2d and 907x 100c cameras have been given away to TH-camrs by Hasselblad. I have counted at least 30 mentions of this on various channels. And it’s clearly multiple six figure amounts they have gifted across the board to get ‘content’. I know a few people who are pro photographers like myself who find this somewhat staggering and while I would like to think the people who run the channels would still be objective it would be fairly difficult to not feel rather ‘giddy’ about being given camera gear worth an absolute fortune and this has clearly been evident in a lot of the content I’ve watched. Sadly being a 50+ year old somewhat skeptical pro photographer it has somewhat devalued the content for me a little. Again not an attack on you as I enjoy your channel a lot - just thought I’d share what I felt as a general observation.
I used the GFX System since 5 years, and switched to the 907x 100cfv (i got a 500cm from m grandpa).
I totally fell in love with the hasselblad System and with the 907x Beauty. It is my only Camera System which i also use for private, kids, coffee or travel.
I use the 38 and 55 and find the AF System fast enough also for my kids.
The X2D is technically a better camera but it has not the spirit and the form factor of the 907x.
Love your videos!! Greetings from Germany
Benj... spot on. X2D is a rational choice with IBIS, Weathersealing, EVF, portrait or landscape - no issue, easy tripod mount, versatility. The 907X is like the M11 - a different experience for the joy of photography. The other comparison is M11 vs 907x or SL3 vs X2D. Color science in particular would be very interesting comparison.
This is me, I decided to use the Leica M system for a different experience. Now I have the best of both worlds with the versatility of size and image quality.
The 907 looks gorgeous. You know that meme when the husband is turned over and the wife is wondering what he’s thinking about - that’s me thinking about the 907. The only thing that is stopping me from purchasing it is that I live in Alaska and the lack of weather sealing is too worrisome to put that kind of cash down. If Hasselblad makes a new version - no other changes besides being more durable- that’s my next purchase.
It’s a beautiful camera. Really is a work of art.
the reality of owning the camera doesn't match up to the expectations, unfortunately... Not having a viewfinder is really limiting especially in bad light. Turns out to be a non-starter for adapting lens. (amazing files, of course, with the native lens)
Sheesh
I can help. As Pros these little beauties have been our cameras of choice since they released the X1d and thie 907x50c- and we have followed the upgrade path diligently - thanks to Clifton Cameras UK - the 907xCFV100c - cannot do 400mp like its bigger sister - (no IBIS) but that is not its strength - I often use it on a salon stand looking down - or underneath looking up - I can use it one handed, it is great for high angle shots handheld - but still that it is not its greatest strength, It hooks onto the back of any Hass Film camera from 1959 onwards - but still there is one thing it does better than anything else and it is not even the fact that on a tripod it becomes invisible at waist level so you can concentrate on your subjects. Nope it's greatest strength is that it looks cool.
We have 2 X2D's and only 1 907x and if I can this is the one I take -Can't wait to see your comparison good luck
While I absolutely love the 907X for its design, I still think that the X2D is a much more practical camera for most people due to IBIS. I own the X2D and couldn’t be happier with it.
My set-up: Hasselblad X2D with various HC lenses, Leica M11/(2022)M6 pretty much covers everything. If I need Med film I use H1 system. I like the Leica M system as my compact go anywhere character image quality driven cameras and Hasselblad's when doing portraits/landscapes/lowlight work.
Absolutely stunning camera, the control grip is a must have.
Ah, the dilemma of only being able to to choose. one. I am still torn between heart and brain. In the meanwhile I have the X1D II with the set of P lenses (28, 45, and 75) to soothe my soul. The one thing that you said was new for me is thinking of putting the 907x in your camera bag as you would do a lens. Considerble space is saved. Still IBIS and EVF calls loudly. I started with old film cameras and that taught me a lot about having good photographic technique. So maybe, IBIS and EVF may not win out. Ah, decisions, decisions! Just too much temptation both have pluses and minuses. A good whiskey may be the solution. 🙂
Both are absolutely beautiful camera's and I can only dream of having one someday. Dreams.
You got me hooked.
I’m torn. My 907 is a magical experience. No matter where I use it. But the other side of me wants that workhorse X2D
Right? Head vs heart
@@cammackey you can't go wrong with the x2d or907. Passion÷obsession×insane tech=invaluable experiences with no bounds. Loved my x2d
A Sophie's Choice. I have the X2D and I think it is the better choice for me despite the charm of the 907. As for image, the X2D is The Chieftain o' the Image Clan hands down. I have the Q3 43. Not even close. I have some old CCD M bodies with nice old retro lenses. The X2D is always the best. I wonder why I even charge the batteries for the others. Great review.
I’ve been waiting for this!
Love how usable and portable the x2d is among with is ibis. For on my pocket vs my gfx. The x2d stealthily made its way into more cathedrals and other sensitive locations. The 907 "looks" great and it's smaller width is super appealing.
L
I think your comment nails it - head says X2D and heart says 907x. The argument for the 907x being good in the studio is lessened by the new X2D firmware allowing for multishot mode because of IBIS - if Hasselblad figures out how to allow multishot without tethering in the X2D it will be amazing for landscape as well. But I just love the size and feel of using the 907x and miss it even though I have the X2D. Perhaps I'll pick up a used 907x 50c - its a lot cheaper, and since the 100c doesn't have IBIS anyway, the difference between the old and new 907x doesn't feel as dramatic as the difference between the X2D and the X1D mkII.
I will not buy a Hasselblad. I will not buy a Hasselblad. I will not...
Benj Wonderful insight between these two cameras...all things aside..aesthetically the edge for me would go vote for the 907x plus its more minimal form factor...Yes totally get the X2D can be seen as an all around workhorse for shoots..but again the look of the 907x does harp back to the analog days especially when it is paired with the 500cm..wow!..the 907x is definitely more of a conversation piece bc of its look....did you find people going up to you and asking what it is?..lol
Thank you for this comparison! I totally agree to the brain/heart decision making and went for the 907X. Just one question: I want to use my Peak Design anchors on it, too. Where did you find the adapters you are using?
That is one sexy intro amigo (music and all)
the only digital cameras I dream having but I didn't see a single Belgian (not sure if a European even) youtube getting this camera
their color system is really so good, they look amazing
gosh... .if I ever win the lottery I won't tell anyone, but there will be signs
Oh, yes, one of the most desirable😍 cameras for me =) Thank you!
You knew they were giving them away . . . so you hit them up! 😛🤙🏽
Haha nah, I’d been requesting things for a bit regardless, but obviously happy it all worked out here.
Buy both if you can . I have the X2D 100C and if I’m going to sell some of my Leica cameras to buy the 907
@@ductritran8637 Yeah, just casually spend 20k.....
also waiting for this!! thanks!!
Now we're talking!
Ngl i would run the X2D anyday. Own practically all the hasselblad stuff since the 907x 50c and even used the 500cm with the CFV original back.
Lemme explain.
The 907x is more of a (fun over practicality) camera with the screen being smaller and having lesser buttons. Its fun but i will never use it for any of my shoots, when i was in australia for my studies, this was the camera i carried and it tend to crash like 40% the time. Perhaps its a early model maybe its cold but it got so bad I had to buy an M11 as my backup camera.
The X2D on the other hand is better for prolonged use. Its more comfy to hold especially on heavier lenses like the 80mm and 135mm + 1.7X converter. Plus the IBIS helps alot when doing night shoots when you dont want to push past ISO800 and want the cityline to be bright.
But in my opinion, the 907x is best for travel and fun as it is lighter and smaller while the X2D is better for technical use. (Trust me i shot close to 6TB on these 2 systems in the 2 years i owned them)
benj, thoughts on the 907 100 vs. older 50? i know you had the 50 for a bit, curious what your take is on entering this unique form factor with the older 50 model?
If I can only afford that camera, I would take that for my trip to you Europe. For now, it’s just a dream from 😢😊
Hi Benj. For those with the 907x but without much knowledge of traditional Hasselblad film cameras, is there a Hasselblad film camera and lens combo that you would recommend to use with the 907x that incorporates the traditional Hasselblad waist level viewfinder and provides the nicest shooting experience? Thank you.
Always love your videos!!! Are you getting access to the new 9mm extension tubes? I’m considering picking one up to pair with the 55v and 135mm. I jumped at the opportunity to and am so greatfull to own the x2d and was almost hesitant to sell it foe a gfx100 ii. I’m sooooo glad I didn’t sell it and love my x2d sooo much. I really really hope they update the 4.0 software to enable field multi-shoot. Or tether to phocus mobile 2 or update phocus mobile so I can combine photos in post foe the 400mp images.
X2d w/38v best street camera, 907 with 55v best portrait and landscape camera. ❤
How would you say it compares color and fidelity wise to the m11?
I've heard people say that the m11 has medium format level fidelity and im extremely happy with mine however Medium format is still smiling at me from time to time.
Great Video as always!
It’s very good. That 60mp sensor is the best one I’ve used in terms of color/dynamic range in 35mm but these are just that next level beyond imo.
I have questions about the quality of the AWB M11, but that is not the main issue here. How are you used to taking pictures and what. As a photographer with 20 years of experience with the M system, I am attracted to the 907 by the ability to shoot the same way as with the M system - from the belly) And the weight of the 907 is comparable to the M system. Although the fast optics of the M are magical and have no competitors.
Great video! Wanted to ask, where did you get the lugs for the 907x? I want to attach peak design anchors to mine, and the lugs on yours seem perfect to do so!
I finally figured it out, if you purchase extra anchors from peak design, those come with it.
Have you been able to use the 907x outdoors in the rain without issue? What are your must have lens recommendations?
I have used the 907X in light rain & snow without issue, but I’d feel bad recommending that to others.
The 55mm f/2.5V is the “must have” lens imo, but I have used the 38/2.5V quite a bit this year as well. Just depends on what focal lengths you gravitate towards.
@@benjhaisch I was going to ask you if you plan on breaking down the lens line up at some point. I have a 500 C/M with the 50mm, 80mm and 180mm lenses, so when I got the 907X, my first thought was to only use native lenses that were wider than the 50, but after about a year of shooting it, I find so much pleasure in using the 907X in it's native format that I am considering more XCD lenses. Focusing on the wide end, I bought the 45P and the 25V at first. I recently picked up the 75P as a "normal" / portrait lens, and so far I am pleased. I am torn about whether the 55V or 38V would be a better everyday lens, though. Since you can crop so deep in the files and still have high resolution images, I am still thinking that either lens would be a great choice.
Hey Benj, I really love your channel and have been following you for a while. I truly miss your Fuji content, but I get why you've gone all in on Hasselblad. Nobody's turning down free high-end gear, especially something as beautiful as that. I know the medium format film photography from Hasselblad is amazing, and the digital system is great in its own way. However, one thing I don't like is that the digital medium format with the lenses in their lineup doesn't give you that true medium format look. Fuji's 1.7 is barely hitting that, and they’re more of a 1.3 look in full-frame terms.
Both Fuji and Hasselblad’s digital medium formats lack the true medium format aesthetic unless you're using third-party manual lenses, like from Mitakon or Leica/Voigtländer. But I’m not gonna spend thousands of dollars on a high-end body and then be reduced to shooting with manual-only glass. It would be great if you could talk more about this on your channel and let people know that, yes, these cameras are beautiful and compact, but they’re really giving you more of a 1.9 full-frame look.
You can easily get a similar effect with a Canon DSLR and a few prime lenses (like the 28mm f1.8, 50mm f1.4, and 85mm f1.8) and just crop it in Lightroom to a 4:3 aspect ratio. Think about the money you’d save by going that route-money that could be spent on models, makeup, lighting, and other things that bring your creative vision to life. I feel like we're all getting a little brainwashed by these companies.
I’m not trying to bash you at all-I absolutely love your channel and find your work really inspiring. Just wanted to share some thoughts. Keep doing what you’re doing!
Hey thanks for the insight. I ended up selling my X-E4 because I just didn’t use it enough to justify and then sold my GFX50S when the 907X came in for the same reason. I feel like Fujifilm had a bit of a slower 2024 release cycle and while I’d love to review all of their things it’s sort of up to my contacts decisions whether I get the new stuff or not. All that to say, I hope their production woes are over and 2025 is a banner year for Fujifilm.
I’ve also been less obsessed with the most shallow DOF imaginable as I have been in the past. That said, of course you can get similar looks from much much much more inexpensive gear. It’s all diminishing returns at some point, but I do think that cameras like these do have their place and the flexibility of the files really is amazing. But do 99% of people *need* cameras like these, of course not. Just like no one *needs* a Leica M11, Q3, and most don’t even need a Sony A1 or other flagships.
I’m fortunate to do this for a living and also have some opportunities from this channel like this and I’m trying not to take them for granted :)
@@benjhaischWell stated.
I wonder when the time will come for them to make a camera with a real medium format sensor size, and not a crop like now?
907X will become a cult classic in 10-20 years.
There's no way I'll ever be able to afford either, but I really enjoyed your video nevertheless. Excellent work as usual
This is how you do ethical disclosure. I'm thrilled that they gave you the cameras, and trust that it doesn't cloud your judgement. Nice vid!
I used to own the 907X 50C. The cold shoe situation was miserable for a tripod queen of a camera - they fixed that with the 100C. The sensor was massive and a total dust magnet, so I wish they would have added a darkslide with the 100C. A lack of even basic weather sealing on an MF camera is also something I find weird. I got the hand grip and my wife correctly asked, "so you got this camera because it's weird and are adding accessories to make it less weird?" I also didn't like the strap wear experience, as the way the camera wanted to lay/bounce depended on the size and weight of the lens. And it ran hot.
I ended up selling it and getting an X1D2, but I could see myself going for a 907X 100C and probably couldn't resist with more improvements.
You have different reaction using the 907X but you also find that the people you are shooting have a different reaction to the 907X. Less intimidating?
Absolutely
One camera for the year Leica sl3 with sl lenses or Hasselblad x2d let’s forget about video just photos what would you choose.
Do I have other cameras? What type of photography?
If you had to pick one camera landscape portraits/weddings what camera would it be Leica sl3 with sl lenses or Hasselblad
Own both. Same
ratio/emotion 😂
I just don't understand how anyone likes the 907. The ergonomics weren't even an afterthought in the design. So, for me X2D reigns supreme here
@@gauravbathija6783 possibly for its ability to connect to the older film bodies
Used the X2D on an event shoot last week alongside A7RV. Highly considering a permanent switch for photos!
The color is different for these cameras. Although it should be the same.
I had someone else comment that on threads as well. I’ve never taken a side by side photo with each, but I did do a project with both and didn’t notice, but it does make me curious about the shift.
Yep. Own both camers and you have skin color difference between them also the the x2d is doing some kind of DR in camera cuz on M mode the x2d is 0.3-0.4 ev brighter.
Why would they release a back that you can put on their 6x6 film cameras and not have a square sensor? That’s part of the experience with those cameras.
Yes you can crop to square but it’s not the same as composing in square. If anyone will release such a sensor I believe Hasselblad can. :-)
I don’t think such a sensor exists?
I’m sure you could cut the wafer that size but the processing and heat dispersion alone would be wildly expensive for
@@benjhaisch, I didn't know it would be more expensive to create a square sensor compared to a rectangle. Thank you!
Something that doesn't get mentioned a lot when it comes to Medium Format is that with a square sensor (or negative) that aspect ratio tends to really shine when the subjects are centered.
The benefit there is your subjects are being placed in the sharpest part of the lens. Although with modern lens design perhaps this isn't as much of an issue as it is with film. What do you think?
Thank you for making such great content, Benj! If I ever get married I'm totally going to find a way to book you :-)
It’s less about the ratio and probably more about the size and heat, but then also like anything else, you’d be hitting a smaller market if people who would be able to pay for a full 56x56 sensor, thus making fewer of them and then making it more expensive to produce. They totally *could* do it, it’d be more about size, price, heat, etc imo
not a fair comparison because the 907X has not been updated whereas the X2D is an updated version
huh?
Dream Cameras dream setups. Maybe do a comparison against the GFX line of cameras? Maybe not which one’s better but more experience of using them in the differences…. Also Rumor has it Fuji will release, medium format, rangefinder camera with a fixed lens. Thoughts? That would definitely be more economical, and definitely something I would be very interested in.
While there are obviously similarities I almost feel like it’s like comparing the Leica SL3 and the Sony A7RV. They have the same sensor (probably) but the experience is so so different.
But yes, I’d love to test that potential camera
Actually the X2D is a better choice. 6 shots 400 megapixel shot will available only on this.
To afford either of these, you have to hustle blud 😏
How accurate is the auto focus. I have the x1d ii 50c and its completely useless. Do you think its worth the upgrade?
It’s very accurate. It can’t deal with a lot of subject movement, but if you have something *relatively* still it’s spot on.
120 film for the win, you can buy a lotttt of film for that, and not pay china
The Mathphotographer copy channel 😅
hahaha did you see my comment on their video over the weekend??
@benjhaisch 2 days late 😂🤣
Math is a nice guy. We go back
Considering so many TH-camrs are currently getting this camera in exchange for a video makes me think a new version is coming soon.
I could see that. I mentioned it in the premiere chat, but if they did, I’d only really want them to add a faster processor to accommodate continuous AF tracking and make it much faster.
Considering the product cycle of the series, an X2DII would be expected around the end of 2025.
I could see them waiting to see what Leica does with their MF and then reacting accordingly.
Or someone in marketing grew a brain. Fuji is smashing them on body + lenses pricing, and this is cost-effective campaigning.
@@astrostl fwiw, for someone like me, I think it makes a lot of sense because these are cameras that I will actually use and will continue to make videos about on my own time/dime anyway. so imo they're going to be getting more than their money's worth here. I wouldn't be able to justify getting this into the system otherwise without selling off a ton of my other tools.
@@benjhaisch for sure. And there are going to be a ton of content creators in the same boat that can *influence* purchases. If an additional 5 units get sold as a result of each, they're probably well into the black.
Having been someone who bought both of these there are some massive operating differences that makes them very far apart in terms of operation.
I also just wanted to say something and this is not a reflection of this channel which I have been watching now for sometime but I am absolutely staggered by how many x2d and 907x 100c cameras have been given away to TH-camrs by Hasselblad.
I have counted at least 30 mentions of this on various channels.
And it’s clearly multiple six figure amounts they have gifted across the board to get ‘content’. I know a few people who are pro photographers like myself who find this somewhat staggering and while I would like to think the people who run the channels would still be objective it would be fairly difficult to not feel rather ‘giddy’ about being given camera gear worth an absolute fortune and this has clearly been evident in a lot of the content I’ve watched.
Sadly being a 50+ year old somewhat skeptical pro photographer it has somewhat devalued the content for me a little.
Again not an attack on you as I enjoy your channel a lot - just thought I’d share what I felt as a general observation.