The Worst Medium Format Camera Money Can Buy : The Fuji GX680 III S

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ม.ค. 2020
  • Watch as I fumble through a review of the Fuji GX680 III S. Sorry for all the cursing, its just how I talk.
    Music Used
    ------------------------------
    Ohayo by Smith The Mister smiththemister.bandcamp.com
    Smith The Mister bit.ly/Smith-The-Mister-YT
    Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/_ohayo
    Music promoted by Audio Library • Ohayo - Smith The Mist...
    ------------------------------
    ------------------------------
    Track: Coffee Dreams - Le Gang [Audio Library Release]
    Music provided by Audio Library Plus
    Watch: • Coffee Dreams - Le Gan...
    Free Download / Stream: alplus.io/coffee-dreams
    ------------------------------
  • แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต

ความคิดเห็น • 259

  • @Sazan107
    @Sazan107 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sorry, this camera is crippled!

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      fucking brilliant. also i know youtube removed the like counter, but be rest assured, there are more dislikes than likes on this video

  • @makebagaines-kelly7377
    @makebagaines-kelly7377 4 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    I’m on my second 680. It’s my favorite, and the best out of all of my cameras that I’ve ever owned. All the lenses a sharp, and they have an incredible focusing capability. This is not a fast camera. You have to move slow and pace yourself. But the images that you get as a result are hard to beat, unless you go to large format. You should keep it .

    • @timothygasper406
      @timothygasper406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Absofreakinglutely. Love love love mine too

  • @agylub
    @agylub 3 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    There are cameras for professionals and there are other cameras as well. You probably can't drive an F1 car either but that doesn't make them bad.

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      sounds like youve never driven an F1 car

    • @agylub
      @agylub 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@awasteoffilm9551 you’re right. They’re for pussies. I raced Unlimited Production on a Suzuki Gs1000S

    • @gaarakabuto1
      @gaarakabuto1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Honestly most proffesional users in Japan had mostly complaints to make about this camera without that meaning that they hated it, the camera is simply a brick with cool features taped on it and if you are not fan of the features you might not be a fan of the tape as well.
      Overall the Mamiya 67 cameras are seen as simply better in every way, that's why all the digital backs are designed for them and nowadays not even adaptors are available for the GX680.
      Honestly the GX680 is a cool camera but you either must be eccentric to prefer it or simply broke and this comes from a fan of this camera that used it extensively and forced my way into using this over the RZ67. Everything could be corrected in this camera though with the support of Fujifilm by adding some much needed accessories at reasonable prices, technically the model is not discontinued and official technical support and CLA is available, so who knows maybe some day.

    • @andyeighttre
      @andyeighttre 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You camera goons are only rivaled in your fan boi’ism(I instead of y because you probably don’t have girlfriends) by wakeboard boat owners.

  • @Ekstraordynaryjny
    @Ekstraordynaryjny 4 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    Ok, I agree the "s" is the worst possible camera. But the version without the "S" is the best camera ever made. If you don't understand why tilts and shifts make it perfect portrait tool, well, yer not really qualified to review cameras.

    • @jolerodav
      @jolerodav 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was wondering if you saw this review already ;)

    • @hocadidilyocuttCAP
      @hocadidilyocuttCAP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      buuuuurrrrn

    • @mikutai6395
      @mikutai6395 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m about to purchase one. What is the difference between the proiiis and the pro 1 or iii

    • @Ekstraordynaryjny
      @Ekstraordynaryjny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@mikutai6395 the biggest difference is the presence of the tilt/shift mechanism. Avoid the "S" version that's being "reviewed" in this dumb video, and yer good to go. Other differences are pretty minor. III will allow you to use different image formats - 645, 6x6 and 6x7. It will also take the original digital back, but that's pretty rare. Other than that they're pretty much the same camera. If you don't need movements, avoid this camera altogether. It's big and unwieldy, you'll be much better off with a RZ67 for example. Unless you're after the standout GXD lenses of this system - these can pack a punch even without movements, and no mistake.

  • @ghtriumph
    @ghtriumph 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Tilt/shift allows absolute control of depth and field. It also squares up a subject such as a building or interior walls. Try one and you’ll never go back to an “s.”

  • @bgrzesiak5996
    @bgrzesiak5996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Not sure what you were looking for, the the GX680 I, II or III were stunning cameras.
    If you think it's the worst camera ever made, it must be more camera than you could handle.

    • @carlpinnaro1273
      @carlpinnaro1273 ปีที่แล้ว

      Obviously you are too immature to realize the beauty in this camera. The only waste was of my time and listening yo your diatribe about being challenged

  • @sonnyzin2063
    @sonnyzin2063 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Blame yourself for not doing enough research and not knowing what this camera is all about before you acquired it instead of blaming the camera. Everyone who are in the know knows how good GX680 series cameras are for their intended purpose.

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hmmm, how do I get in the "know"? I want know!

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@awasteoffilm9551 Learn photography.

  • @VizionzBlur
    @VizionzBlur 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    I have a GX680II, and it seems that you have missed the point of this camera. It isn’t made to be lugged around everyday for casual photography. It’s made for portraits,product photography and landscape photography, essentially professional work. The actual GX680III has the tilt and shifting function to be able to change the plane of focus and perspective correction. Both very important features when shooting all the above genres in a serious extent. You have essentially bought a camera that doesn’t suit your use case and blame the camera for that. The lenses are all god tier on this system. They don’t have any form of aberrations and are all sharp as shit. You glance over that along with the fact that the level of detail you get out of a 6*8 negative from a GX680 is immense. You are right in saying that the RZ67 would have suited you a lot better. But you should have researched into how expensive of a system the GX680 is before actually diving into one under equipped. So I would absolutely agree with you saying that this is a horrible purchasing decision, but that’s on you and not the camera.

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      yeah but like, I wanna use it in way's it wasn't intended. So I can be DifF3rEnT.

    • @VizionzBlur
      @VizionzBlur 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A Waste of Film how so?

    • @VizionzBlur
      @VizionzBlur 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I literally carry it out like it’s a mirrorless camera, never had a single problem, is it perhaps the way you use it that gives you so much trouble?

    • @bthemedia
      @bthemedia 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      MOST of the issues identified with the camera are NOT related to how it is used... it’s directly related to the build of the camera itself:
      1) old electronics and contacts failing on lens/body/film back, 2) poor button layout / misfires, 3) different obscure sets of batteries, 4) no reasonable or affordable shutter release cable, 5) odd annoying sounds on LCD lights and shutter and winder

    • @VizionzBlur
      @VizionzBlur 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      bwvids the contacts failing with the body is a rare problem, although it’s one I’m experiencing myself. The poor button layout isn’t a problem at all related to how the camera is meant to be used. The only actually problem is the button being very light and hair trigger sensitive. The battery issue can be solved by buying the battery holder.(yes it’s extremely expensive for what it is, but for a camera of this Calibre stuff like this should be expected). The shutter release cables are extremely cheap as of recently and not a problem at all, although the shutter itself doesn’t have a T mode so that’s extremely inconvenient to hold down the shutter, but again, not a problem for the intended use case. The annoying sounds are literally just preference, and a lot of them are there to inform you of something, e.g last frame , bad exposure, camera fault. And whatnot. Also the camera isn’t that old, it was manufactured til 2007/8 and is still in professional use to this day by people who took care of it. However it does irritate me how fully electronic this camera is it can fail completely due to electronics that no one will repair due to how complex the camera is. I hope this clears some things up.

  • @ultratoz
    @ultratoz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I have twho medium format TLR-cameras, three medium format folder cameras. A Bronica SQ-system 6x6 camera (kind of like hasselblad) and also a couple of large format cameras. - My Fuji GX680 III has the clearest viewfinder of them all. None of my medium format cameras have working meters - even though you can get an AE-finder for the GX680. So the photographers job is to frame the picture, focus, meter or guess the exposure (i seldom guess). If you find this camera hard to use, I have no idea what would be easy enough for you ;) - The Fuji GX680 and my bronica are the cameras where I set the aperture and shutter most quickly. The focus is quick and the locking system a blessing. - after triggering the shutter, the GX680 winds to next frame unless you have told it not to so (set multi exposure) and is ready to shoot within a second. If i am looking for something to move quickly around mydel handheld I use my Bronica or a 35mm camera. Leaf shutters allows flash sync all the way up to 1/400th of a second. Yay
    The ease of changing between portrait and landscape and at the same time changing the frames in the viewfinde is ingenious. - The front movements (not the S-model) allows for focus plane wizardry - as with large format, just so so much quicker to actually take the picture. After your picture is composed and focused locked. You don't loose time having to put in the film holders (and maybe moving the camera as you do) - pull the dark slate which allows us to get more portraits in focus than with large format. The GX680 is not something I would use without a tripod. - The separation of batteries in body and back is something i find positive.
    The easy to trigger shutter button is an annoyance but using their proprietary cable I very seldom accidentally trip the shutter. The missing standard connector for threaded shutter release is something many of us miss for long exposures. Getting yourself an S-model is kind of missing the point of the entire system for most photographers. Luckily for people wanting proper information they'll find got competent reviews on the net. Even from seing this video - most people with some knowledge will ignore your silly conclusions and see some of the potential of the camera. Nobody can force you to fall in love with a system - but get yourself a non-S model and happy dynamic shooting!

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the write up! I agree my comments are silly, and that's the point!

    • @timothygasper406
      @timothygasper406 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. This is truly a great camera. I have the first edition GX 680 with movements. I use a spot meter mostly and sometimes a hand held ambient incident meter. It's my favorite camera and I have plenty of cameras. It's best if he sticks to one of those PhD camera until he gets more educated on using something like this....if he ever does. Have fun, be safe and keep shooting. Oh...how do you like the Bronica? I love that camera and would like to have done but my wife would kill me and then divorce me. I got the Hasselblad 500CM and am very happy with it. I would appreciate hearing how it is for you.

  • @calabro67
    @calabro67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    This is a camera that only professional photographers can appreciate ...
    Hey kid keep taking pictures with your iphone :)
    enjoy yourself

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      dont JUMP to the conclusion that I have an iphone silly. also i will enjoy myself, thanks bud!

  • @randalllewter7930
    @randalllewter7930 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If you do not understand the use of the camera and do not take the time to learn how to use it any camera is "bad". I was selected to me one of the first USA users of the camera in the 1980s. It is a great camera for job it was designed for. For product catalog photographer it is great. We did not purchase the camera because in furniture photography we needed a larger negative. Any camera is bad if you do not know how to use it.

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      congrats i guess man? ill buy you a beer next time you want to tell me about international relationships in film photography in the 80s

  • @imnotsurewhy
    @imnotsurewhy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If you're reading this. This camera isn't for normal consumers. This is for professionals. It's an amazing camera, I've used it plenty of times at Milk studio.

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      milk doesnt mix well with studios, most cameras are lactose intolerant. You would know this if you were a professional

  • @rogiervdheide
    @rogiervdheide 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Your video is silly and ironic, I got it, and hey the GX680III is easily the best medium format camera that has ever been made. But the S-version is indeed not worth its money. The non-S III, the full version I'd say, just like the I and II, have lens movements and that is great, and unique in medium format. I love the GX680III, and I hope to be using mine for many years to come! But I would never purchase the S version, it's a waste of money in my view.
    If you're interested in getting a GX680III remote release, contact me. I make them.

    • @Restroomsoap
      @Restroomsoap 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha cool to see you on here Roger. We were just discussing the strap mount for these guys on facebook.

  • @aaronbarclay3675
    @aaronbarclay3675 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Your hatred for this camera somehow makes me want one! Great review.

  • @stevenpam
    @stevenpam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Epi-tome?

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      thats how its spelled aint it?

    • @stevenpam
      @stevenpam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@awasteoffilm9551 That might work for Spanish, German or Italian. Unfortunately in English you just need to know! Never mind, you gave it a shot.

  • @ctphotographx
    @ctphotographx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    GX680 best and most fun rewarding camera system I ever enjoyed. Used it for years, after 500cm days.
    Loved your review.

  • @MyPartytime69
    @MyPartytime69 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’ve got a gx680ii and I think the problem a lot of people have with these is you need to work up to them… at the gym. Once you can squat 200lb, bench press a modest 175, you should be good to handhold the camera for 15m at a time. Seriously, though I do use a strap made for a heavy camera shoulder bag mounted to the front rails to support handheld use.

  • @emulatorretro
    @emulatorretro 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can the regular 680 take landscape photos though?

  • @otti358
    @otti358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What a shit are you telling, that's the best camera I've ever had. You just have to know how to use them.

    • @mikutai6395
      @mikutai6395 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey man I’m thinking about picking one up and willing to learn the ends and outs of it. Mostly do landscape and portrait anyways and this would be my first medium format camera. I don’t mind if it’s a huge leap I hear nothing but positives about the camera and the photos it produces. My confusion is what model should I get? Which should I avoid and which should I pick up

  • @short1961
    @short1961 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think you should have gone with the RB or the RZ. Both the RB/RZ and the GX680 are beast; actually the GX680 is a mega beast compared to the Mamiya. I have the mark iii. I got it for the negative and the front movement. Compared to the Hasselblad it is a very limited use camera. I understand being tired of 6x6. Did you think of finding a 645 back?

  • @photomaster1
    @photomaster1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Interesting review of the GX680 III S, for one I understand why you got it I picked up the first iteration of this camera I like the fact of having the ability to move the front standard. As for the light leak I'm going with the bellows are not connected correctly. I found it very easy to disconnect the bellows while removing the lens, yeah very bad design system like large format cameras have the same issue. I like the fact that you shown how ticked off you are about this Gold plated brick and people seeing you with it will wonder if it's a new type of weapon... As for me I just tell people the truth it's brain scanning device that just came out... and we are looking for a few good people to try it on...

  • @barisaktinmaz
    @barisaktinmaz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have been using this camera since 20 years and this is my favorite camera of all time!!!

  • @Tcivan
    @Tcivan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is ridiculous. You bought a top end studio camera and expected it to be a Hassy 500c. This is like being annoyed at an ARRI LF, cause it’s not a Sony mirrorless and is complicated to use vs pressing a button.

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      and you spent the time to comment and feed my hysteria! i claim victory in this battle

  • @BehzadRad
    @BehzadRad 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your straight and frank review 👌🏻🙏

  • @Super.Quasar
    @Super.Quasar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great to see that you've found the perfect match, it's not easy but you've cracked it. :-)

  • @antigen4
    @antigen4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    it's a FANTASTIC camera but needs to be fixed permanently to a studio stand. it's NOT really a handheld camera.

  • @adamkencki
    @adamkencki 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    so you couldn't take any good photos with 6x6 camera and bought 6x8?

  • @eyesonly4451
    @eyesonly4451 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Being an experienced GX680III shooter I can't _totally_ disagree. Think of the 'IIIS' version as the _Simple_ version. It lacks the front movements typically found on the regular GX680 I/II/III bodies. It's only redeeming feature is that it's a cheaper (and possibly a stronger) alternative for attaching the longer/heavier lenses that require a support rail and therefore don't really allow for movements anyway.
    On the other hand, the regular GX680 I/II/III (non-S version) supports front movements with all non-rail lenses, and is the MF champion of tabletop style photography. This would include subjects like handmade goods, jewelry, and food. It can take photos that would otherwise require the movements of a 4x5 large format camera. If you want that plate of sushi art in focus front to back, you'll need movements. With either camera, you'll need a tripod or (preferably) a camera stand.
    I'm not sure about the I and II versions, but the IIIN film back can automatically set the ISO based on the film leader (can be overridden), and can be set to imprint the image date and time between frames. In fact, each film back on the GX680 has its own set of batteries, electronics, and configuration separate and apart from the main body. While it is possible to Frankenstein a digital back to a GX680, it's not recommended. You're far better off with this camera system to capture on film and scan for your digital results.

  • @lukeazzopardistudio
    @lukeazzopardistudio 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    When I turn it on, there is a string ticking sound and it doesn’t work (even though it’s on). Any tips?

  • @photozen8398
    @photozen8398 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did you figure out the light leak? could be the billows?

  • @Andrew-wb7wn
    @Andrew-wb7wn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Up next
    AUTOPLAY
    THE BEST MEDIUM FORMAT CAMERA EVER MADE - The Fuji GX680III

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i wonder if it has any correlation to this video

  • @ZzdeathangelzZ
    @ZzdeathangelzZ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    where can I see your work?

  • @tomatemittollwut3003
    @tomatemittollwut3003 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the camera capable of metering automatically without an AE-finder?

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah, but good luck finding an affordable AE finder. or an affordable lightmeter
      especially in this market

  • @ryandavis8045
    @ryandavis8045 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I haven’t heard this much forced swearing since I watched the Angry Video Game Nerd. Trouble is, I don’t think you’re really self aware about it.

  • @JanPBtest
    @JanPBtest 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The reason Fuji did not make DSLRs was that DSLRs are an oxymoron in the digital era. The SLR design (which is optically inferior to the rangefinder (mirrorless) one) only made sense as a compromise in the film era: you sacrificed a bit of quality, got extra weight, cost, noise, mirror slap, shutter delay - BUT you got through-the-lens viewing. In the digital era this point is obviously moot and SLRs should have vanished instantly. Instead, camera manufacturers kept them artificially alive for years, fleecing younger photographers by convincing them that DSLRs were superior to mirrorless. It took a smaller manufacturer like Fuji to break that scam with their excellent X-series.

  • @AlaskaPalms
    @AlaskaPalms 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How well does it render T O N E S tho?

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      fuck bro porntra 420 t o n e z are unreal

  • @GrainyEffects
    @GrainyEffects 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @ 7:54 is that Louisville, Ky?

  • @fthprodphoto-video5357
    @fthprodphoto-video5357 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Go for the Bronica 67 it’s a very portable and easy to use medium format it even has a leaf shutter system

  • @coolfox999
    @coolfox999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This wasn't a f..g shutter sound this was a huge mirror flipping up and down numbty , electronic shutter in the lens produce literally no sound at all.

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      literally no sound. vaccum. lack of sound actually

  • @SimonFalkentorp
    @SimonFalkentorp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you. Maybe I’ll buy one.

  • @albertjimenez7896
    @albertjimenez7896 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Prior to making the purchase, it would have been prudent for you to have known that the camera's only use would be for studio photography. There is no reason to trash a highly regarded camera just because it doesn't meet your needs.

    • @goldenhourkodak
      @goldenhourkodak ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's a great tripod camera too. I know people who do landscapes with them.

  • @MrCipoy
    @MrCipoy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You should buy Fuji gw690, portable, good for mobility, this for studio, maybe lanskap

  • @owepofjienoqpithfvn
    @owepofjienoqpithfvn ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The worst type of review video that time can buy. Being cocky doesn’t make you cool.

  • @simon5665
    @simon5665 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You want challenging buy a russian camera and dont break it lol!

  • @advancedmicrosystems4658
    @advancedmicrosystems4658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video is a self ironic trolling masterpiece

  • @jankubat2694
    @jankubat2694 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nah, still going for it whenever there's the opportunity. I know it is a very stupid idea, and that's I want to do it.

  • @harrisoncable5885
    @harrisoncable5885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish the music wasn’t so loud

  • @marcborkin898
    @marcborkin898 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    While with Fujifilm for 13 years, I sold the gx680 packages to some of the most elite photographers in the world. Another example of garbage on TH-cam

  • @gus3573
    @gus3573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seems like he failed to do his homework before buying the camera, and then blamed the GX680 for not doing what he wanted. Weight and size are easy to look up for and user manuals are available online. By the way, the RZ67 was also designed for studio work. If you want to learn about the GX680 check Todd Eckelman videos, he is an actual photographer.

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      fuck man, how do i take actual photos!?! i didnt realize ive only been taking non-actual photos this whole time!

    • @davidabarak
      @davidabarak 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@awasteoffilm9551 I think many of us here would love to see some of your work. If you have something online please post a link.

  • @KeychildProductions
    @KeychildProductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is like one of the CINCO products on Tim and Eric, and now i kinda want one... your review worked!!!!

  • @Michele_Berardi
    @Michele_Berardi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude i laughed my ass off, Epic video
    thank you for having bought that train car ♥️

  • @rojer9542
    @rojer9542 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome camera and fantastic lenses. I throughly enjoy shooting with mine.

  • @deltatango2581
    @deltatango2581 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I own the Mark I ver and I have zero issues with it. It's def heavier than a Hassy, but it has more options. Having come from a 4x5 w front and rear tilt and shift, this is pretty damn close to that. You can go from 6x8 down to a 6x4.5 in negative size which gives you more exposures. It has the tilt and shift, as well as the rear Horizontal/Vertical twist like the Mamiya 67RB/Z as well. I would say prob the only thing I do not like about it is the trigger release cable is not like the trad camera. I have heard there are ways around this though. So would research it. The lens system is sharp as a razor, mine came w a side pack w AA batteries, so using the rechargeable works great. I love wlf personally over the fancy other ones...plus they are lighter. This baby is a def brick shithouse to carry, but you get used to it after awhile. I strongly advise using a tripod. The S model I heard sucked anyway, so stayed away from it. Maybe see if can sell it on ebay and go w a Mamiya RB/Z 67. It might be more to your liking, or perhaps a Bronica etrs-i. Good luck and sorry ended up w a dud.

  • @emotionblur7214
    @emotionblur7214 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good review. I agree that too much electronics in an old piece of hardware can get in the way, it's more defect-prone, and that's an added risk when you buy gear on ebay. The back with the fancy display and separate batteries would be an annoyance to me as well. The shutter/advance sound is very nasty indeed! I think I'm happier with my RZ67 Pro II :) The fuji has the advantage of 6x8 format (and t/s, wow that's great), but that comes at a price (in size, weight and $) especially if it uses the revolving back. Mamiya 6x7 format is less attractive to me, it makes the camera bigger then Hassy or bronica but it's better than 6x6 and hell, it's smaller than this elephant :) By the way, have you considered to go to an older 680 model?

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I specifically went with the III because the older models use built in batteries that are non-replaceable. Makes them essentially useless unless plugged into a power source, or unless you solder new stuff in, which no thanks. Also the III is just much more aesthetic, looks like the gen 4 Supra of medium format cameras

  • @zagornica
    @zagornica 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I just bought one after watching you video hehe

  • @composeexpose8009
    @composeexpose8009 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a nice camera, but after my experience with the RZ I have trust issues with cameras that rely on electronics.

  • @izzwizamahjah275
    @izzwizamahjah275 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the exact camera but with a 6x7 film mask and 6x7 screen and that remote and 45° finder

  • @444flashlight
    @444flashlight 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ilford has the best Camera Model for you: th-cam.com/video/yCrh1vSt4r0/w-d-xo.html

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ahahahahahh I get it, because it's disposable. I got the joke.

  • @davidabarak
    @davidabarak 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Epi-tome?" That's a bad sign for the rest of the video. Try "eh-PIT-oh-mee.")

  • @nick4506
    @nick4506 ปีที่แล้ว

    tilt and shift is useful and for architectural photography. they make specity lenses with it for full frame. but yea that's a lot of camera and light leaks not a great experience

  • @Insightinvoker
    @Insightinvoker 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's mainly for stills, portraits and products however i think for your purpose a DSLR or mirrorles would suit better. I've seen these setups mostly in studios and very cumbersome to lug around for outdoor shoots. Medium format are different breeds of camera. I grew up processing films on dark rooms and shoots in studio and this camera is one of the best portraits camera. Looks like you're not used to the intricacies of an classic equipment, go for a modern full frame camera, the weight will be next to nothing. Camera has come a long way since its inception , do the research before you purchase a camera for 400 dollars thats a reasonable price considering a full frame or medium format goes for 6k. The camera comes in all sorts to suit different needs and requirements. This will not be for everyone

  • @patcliffordfootballcoach
    @patcliffordfootballcoach 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    you should check out Fuji GW690 easy to use very sharp and smaller

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      i want the Fuji GW680 for the meme and also because no one else would have one

  • @michaelbennettphoto
    @michaelbennettphoto 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey dude what’s your Instagram! I also live in Oklahoma and have a question for you!

  • @jealius4340
    @jealius4340 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video is pure Gold haha!!

  • @aarontharris
    @aarontharris ปีที่แล้ว

    "Everything is automated" Like how there is no silly metering system inside the camera? Like how exposure must be dialed in manually? Like how focus is manual? I'm not sure what is automated besides winding? I think you must mean everything is electronic as opposed to gears and springs. My Hasselblad 500 lenses are powered via gears and I love it but the shutter speed is sometimes off and I need to have them tuned which sux.

  • @bernardkealey6449
    @bernardkealey6449 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I left a particularly rude comment after watching just over a minute of this yesterday, for which I apologise profusely.
    I’m not the biggest fan of this camera, but it does have some redeeming features; or at least they usually do - but you bought a model which doesn’t have front movements????
    Ok, yup, I now tend to agree; u did by the “worst” medium format camera possible for non-studio use…
    It’s a pity you didn’t get the “normal”; it’s a great platform to play around with technical functions. It’s about the cheapest possible “modern” technical camera, and it’s got a cheap diet of 120 rather than 4x5, and the glass available for it is right up there.
    Apart from the weight, the thing that kills it for me is it’s total reliance on electronics. I’m like a damn walking super capacitor or EMP gun that fries any device more than 2yrs out of warranty, or brand new kit if I’m on holiday or touring…
    Again, apologies for lashing in prior comment - having actually watched the whole vid, it’s one of the more informative and drily amusing reviews I’ve seen for some time.
    ☮️

  • @fabiodoublebroad5389
    @fabiodoublebroad5389 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is very cheap on ebay though... 1500 USD for a full set with 6 lenses and two backs

  • @franciscovarela7127
    @franciscovarela7127 ปีที่แล้ว

    You sold a 500C for the GX680? That's crazy! On the other hand the GX680 is an excellent film camera in the studio and outdoors when mounted on a tripod.

  • @enthdegree
    @enthdegree 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    epitome
    also awesome video

  • @LennyCooke636
    @LennyCooke636 ปีที่แล้ว

    I saw a picture of this camera somewhere online and it looked so damn sophisiticated I decided to learn more about it. I never knew Fuji made a medium format camera althoughIi don't know much about Fuji cameras period. I'm sorry you feel so bad about this camera, but I can't blame you. I felt the same about my POS Canon EOS-3 which I have recently sold. looks like to much Engineering went into this too many bells and whistles. This is a good case against manufacturers trying to lull consumers to sleep by burrying them with the kitchen sink, instead of focusing on the essentials. Another TH-cam video claims that this is the best MF ever built, but I haven't had the chance to view it yet. By the sound of the shutter button on the Fuji GX680 I need not look any further YIKES !

  • @caileighxion8939
    @caileighxion8939 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Extremely difficult camera to use :-) Get a point and shoot camera...

  • @theonlinething1039
    @theonlinething1039 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretty well done video, I love the swearing!
    But I think it‘s a pretty nice camera, I shot quite a few commercials on it, with either film or a digital back, the bellows system is sooo good for packshots and portraits! The real downside of the whole system is that it‘s electronic only and yeah the button placement is shit. But overall a nice camera and for my kinda work the right tool. Guten Tag, adiós!

  • @northof-62
    @northof-62 ปีที่แล้ว

    This reminds me of that man who wanted to impress an actress who was obviously very beautiful.
    So he walks up to her and says: -You're the worst looking actress I've ever seen!
    According to legend - it worked. He got his woman.

  • @iaincphotography6051
    @iaincphotography6051 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is a studio camera first and foremost. Watch Todd Eckleman doing his review of the GFXIII. A poor workman always blames his tools. Get a 645 format, you wont get tired.

  • @xiangchen2569
    @xiangchen2569 ปีที่แล้ว

    I owned two of gx iii and one of gx iiis , they are big and heavy, but they are most useful cameras for studio!!!

  • @richardsisk1770
    @richardsisk1770 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like your sense of humor 🤣 thanks for eliminating my interest in this monstrosity. I have a history of buying huge and difficult to use cameras including the V-Pan 617 Mark III also referred to by yours truly as the V-Pain. 😂

  • @henriqueraucci
    @henriqueraucci ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing FU@%!NG Camera!

  • @andytheturtle87
    @andytheturtle87 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have convinced me to buy one, (I am a masochist) eventually (i am also a procrastinator).

  • @ghosttownsentinel5288
    @ghosttownsentinel5288 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It was hilarious to see you venting, but I understand your anger. I bought the version II of this camera from Japan and returned it before the week was out. I use large format and medium format cameras and I thought I could have the best of both worlds with this one. But the weight and finicky electronics dampened my enthusiasm. I bought a Rolleiflex instead. A complete opposite of this cinder block in weight and shutter sound, and still use a 4x5 for tilt and shift. Anyway, the video was thoroughly entertaining!

  • @MrTnicodeme
    @MrTnicodeme 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i feel bad for you... fucking hasselblad escaped you.
    buy a pentax 6x7, i enjoy the RB67 but i wouldnt recommend it since it's so heavy. maybe the RZ is lighter.

  • @erh
    @erh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hilarious

  • @samvorms6163
    @samvorms6163 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great video man keep it up!

  • @calumstewart3009
    @calumstewart3009 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    cool vid. get a pentax bro

  • @oldjapanesephotos3684
    @oldjapanesephotos3684 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm pretty sure it's irony here and you in fact love the camera (except for the tilt and shift S version lacks). Currently looking to buy one from Japan, that's how I run into your video. I hope you didn't sell it, image quality it's unbeatable, they say

  • @yupimp
    @yupimp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    this was fun

  • @andre1987eph
    @andre1987eph ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you even own a tripod bro?

  • @lbochtler
    @lbochtler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So, basically, stick with 8x10". Got it

  • @alejandroromerodiaz8503
    @alejandroromerodiaz8503 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The film Gods part was great.
    LMAO

  • @henriqueraucci
    @henriqueraucci ปีที่แล้ว

    I made my RZ PRO IID, the most powerfull 6x7, 330MB camera in the world, with my hand made sliding adaptor. Make that big boy a full 6x8 Digital camera!

  • @miguela.migallon5055
    @miguela.migallon5055 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The perfect camera for hiking!!! Hahahaha

  • @timothygasper406
    @timothygasper406 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    First...what ever gave you the idea this is 'supposed' to be a large format? Even the name...680...tells you it's medium format. But you're correct...this would better serve professional photographers. Photographers who know what they're doing and well appreciate quality cameras and excellent lenses. My GX680 (first edition) works gloriously. Extra viewfinders are readily available and not that expensive...depending on which one you're looking for. Overall, you should stick with something that is less "complicated" for you. Oh...don't know how your film got ****** up while you were shooting so that issue can't be addressed. As for batteries....I use the 6 AA battery compartment which attaches to the left side of the camera as you pointed out. It truly is a wonderful camera once get get acquainted with it, but please do get the battery compartment and forgo searching for those hard-to-find expensive ones. Yes, it is rather expensive, I paid 150 for it about 5 years ago, but once you have it....AA batteries are a much better way to go. I could certainly try to make you feel better about this great camera or you can just stick to what you're more familiar with. Oh...the Hasselblad 500CM is absolutely an excellent medium format camera. I bought mine in around 2006 when prices were dirt cheap ($115 for the body and same low prices for lenses, etc), but prices have really soared now. More people are getting black into film and then digitizing them. Hope you come to appreciate this marvelous camera. Stay happy and keep shooting. Also...Is get 10 shots per roll but it depends on how you are loading the film. Yeah...after listening to the last few minutes...would be SO much better for you to get a do-it-all camera. You know...a PHD camera?

  • @soupreem
    @soupreem 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was great and it’s sad how many people don’t understand that lmao

    • @awasteoffilm9551
      @awasteoffilm9551  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i enjoy the fact that this video pisses people off enough to dislike it. good engagement

  • @bthemedia
    @bthemedia 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very funny and entertaining, thank you doe sharing the info!

  • @gerhardbotha7336
    @gerhardbotha7336 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like a great camera

  • @wojciechneprostipotocki
    @wojciechneprostipotocki 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Poklony służą do korekcji perspektywy i nie tylko w wielkim formacje

  • @JhonMediaArchive
    @JhonMediaArchive 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    that’s a Great camera for professional use

  • @brucewells4029
    @brucewells4029 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've had two of them mark 1 then the mark 3 yes your right they are a electronic mess never again and I'm s pro of 30 years up to 4x5

  • @roberttangen3508
    @roberttangen3508 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You mentioned the RZ67 in your review as being a much better camera. You are most likely right about that. I have the RB67 and love it. You can also get 6x6 and 6x8 back for the Mamiya RB and RZ 67. That along with the native 6x7 backs would pretty much cover all your medium format needs.

  • @sullyroams
    @sullyroams 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I personally like all the cursing.

  • @999killerchris
    @999killerchris ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like you need new bellows. Good camera once it’s sorted.