Ukraine's ASRAAM Franken-SAM

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 75

  • @TheArmourersBench
    @TheArmourersBench  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Be sure to check out our accompanying article for this video here -
    armourersbench.com/2024/02/09/ukraines-asraam-supacat-franken-sam/
    Thanks for watching! - Matt

  • @willbarnstead3194
    @willbarnstead3194 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +100

    Given the short development cycle for this weapon, one can definitely say that necessity is the mother of invention.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Absolutely seems to be.

    • @acmelka
      @acmelka 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A lot of defense industry types will tell you that this timeframe is impossible.

    • @johnd2058
      @johnd2058 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Certainly the obstetric surgeon.

    • @henrik_worst_of_sinners
      @henrik_worst_of_sinners 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes the necessity for s0d0my and other debouchery is a very strong driver for the West. We can't have anyone in the world refusing pride parades now can we. 🏳️‍🌈

  • @glennridsdale577
    @glennridsdale577 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    For those who don’t know, CAMM is essentially ASRAAM with an active radar seeker and a cold launch booster. Personally I’d like to see the RF head as an option for ASRAAM.

  • @minhtri649
    @minhtri649 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    During World War II, Great Britain indeed improvised and developed several simple yet effective weapons and platforms to meet the demands of war. Two notable examples of such improvisation are the Sten gun and the Sherman Firefly.

  • @njuarin15
    @njuarin15 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

    Peak developed by two blokes in a shed energy here.

    • @TammoKorsai
      @TammoKorsai 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      That's the tried-and-tested British way of inventing things.

    • @flamingsmore5904
      @flamingsmore5904 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@TammoKorsai yep, that’s how accuracy international came about. 😂😂

  • @corvanphoenix
    @corvanphoenix 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    ASRAAM is a damn good missile. It's great to see just how good. This is the last thing it was built for, but it's so versatile you could easily believe it was built for the popup SHORAD role too.
    Honestly, I lament the lack of Western commitment to 🇺🇦 on a daily basis & wish we'd start giving them everything we have, immediately. Still, I shudder to think of where 🇺🇦 would be right now without strong, immediate 🇬🇧 support & leadership.

    • @lightsector1523
      @lightsector1523 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Спасибо вам огромное за позицию.Я со своей семьёй живу в Киеве возле известной детской поликлиники куда прилетела боевая часть роZZийской ракеты и убила 6 человек,которые пытались попасть убедище.Это всё мои соседи,в этой истории огромная трагедия.Мой сын учился в одной школе с девочкой которая погибла,а её маму мы часто видели в школе.Отец с младшим ребёнком остался жив,потому как оббежал здание и будил сторожа чтоб тот открыл центральный вход.Сила этого взрыва была до такой степени мощьной,что мы её почувствовали в своём доме с такой силой,что у нас подпрыгнула в спальне огромная кровать,так мы живём в 300 метрах от эпицентра взрыва.Клгда мы прибежали на место происходящего мы были в ужасе,там выгорели деревья которым по 40-50 лет,в соседних домах выбило все окна.У этих людей не было шанса выжить.Мне запомнилось как дедушка этой девочки всю ночь и всё утро сидел возле накрытого тела внучки и держал её за руку.И такое происходит сейчас во всех городах Украины,а такие города как Харьков,Одесса,Днепр,Запорожье,Кропивницкий они обстреливают каждый день.Я хочу вас поблагодарить за всю помощь которые вы не безразличные честные люди нам передали и очень хочу вас попросить,не дайте продажным политикам нас слить,потому как если мы проиграем,то путин и чёкнутые россияне которые поддерживают эту войну на Украине не остановятся.Западу и НАТО в случае поражения Украины придётся воевать с рф-фией уже в странах Балтии и Польше.Возможно запад и от Балтии и Польши откажется, ну в таком случае это будет выставлено как поражение в Холодной войне 2.0 и вся финансовая система рухнет,а значит и благосостояние западного мира.🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

    • @corvanphoenix
      @corvanphoenix 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @lightsector1523 I will never give up. Your true supporters, who donate the most anyway, will never stop. We know, there's no choice. It doesn't matter what 🇷🇺 do & say. It doesn't matter how disappointing our Western government are. Or how many bots they send. The only thing that matters is 🇺🇦, 🇺🇦 lives & 🇺🇦 victory.

  • @marcusott2973
    @marcusott2973 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Much awaited, much appreciated excellent insights as always from you

  • @The_ZeroLine
    @The_ZeroLine 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was a fantastic episode.

  • @chriswerb7482
    @chriswerb7482 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The term FrankenSAM only applies where Western and Russian/Soviet SAM systems have been combined, to allow the latter to use (typically older) Western missiles such as Sea Sparrow.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Does it though? It's not exactly an official designation. I think strapping AIM-132 on a truck gets an honorary pass. Thanks for watching!

    • @jonathanwebb8307
      @jonathanwebb8307 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      well we don't know what the targeting radar is. Most likely its beig unused with a combination of different radars

  • @420folife
    @420folife 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Man the cost saving by making a ground system such as this and the nasams use very common air to air missiles was a genius move. You can literally pump out missiles for airplanes and also your close range ground systems all using the same missile. With how cheap drone warfare is going there is gonna have to be a cheap solution to counter it. This isn’t a huge dent in the cost but it’s in the right direction for sure.

  • @T33K3SS3LCH3N
    @T33K3SS3LCH3N 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    That's when all the buzzword-talk about "modularity" finally pays off.

  • @christopherwang4392
    @christopherwang4392 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Is the ASRAAM compatible with any AIM-9 Sidewinder launchers? The F-16 Fighting Falcon, the AN/TWQ-1 Avenger, or even the MIM-72 Chaparral equipped with the ASRAAM would seem like a viable air defense option for Ukraine.

    • @TheArmourersBench
      @TheArmourersBench  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I'm not sure I don't know enough about what the various rails are spec'd to. But the US are working on AIM-9 based systems similar to this one.

    • @tessjuel
      @tessjuel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@TheArmourersBench Ukraine already has several NASAMS system that can fire both AIM-9 Sidewinder and AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles but it seems they've only actually used AMRAAMs so far.
      Speaking of NASAMS, Norway also has a system called NORSOL, a unified fire control system for NASAMS, RBS 70 MANPADS and Bofors L70 AA guns. I wonde if these FrankenSAMs an be integrated in a similar way.

    • @LordOceanus
      @LordOceanus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@TheArmourersBench I can say confidently that they use the same hardpoint design so fitting on a rail is a yes. If the system can be reprogrammed to work with AIM-9 though, that's another question.

  • @TheBongReyes
    @TheBongReyes 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Initially, from the title of the video, I thought this would be Ukrainian ingenuity. But then the video starts with stating the system is UK-built. So, it’s British ingenuity instead. Sounds about right.

  • @mickeymalone955
    @mickeymalone955 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Brilliant invention to help Ukraine. The USA is so impressed with the system that they are considering manufacturing their own version! Well done to the engineers involved with the design and manufacture of the system. The UK at its best. One improvement could be to use longer range missiles!!

  • @nicholasmaude6906
    @nicholasmaude6906 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The MBDA team need to quickly develop a box-type launch-canister to hold the missile AND find a suitable off-the-shelf rocket-motor to use as a launch-booster.

    • @cease_requiem6034
      @cease_requiem6034 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Land-Ceptor already has this, but it uses a cold-launch system similar to Tor. It was derived from ASRAAM and has an active seeker.

    • @nicholasmaude6906
      @nicholasmaude6906 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cease_requiem6034 I know about the cold-launch method however having an actual launch-booster (Cold-launched of course) will extend the ASRAAMs range perhaps to what its air-launched range is. Being launched from the ground dramatically shortens its range.

  • @acmelka
    @acmelka 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I worry the thinking that allows rapid prototype to deployment of good enough weapons systems to fill an urgent need is near a lost art in the military industrial complex of the west

  • @gawkthimm6030
    @gawkthimm6030 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I think the future of air defense lies along this direction, out produce your enemy with cheap mobile AA missiles platform and "good-enough" intercept missiles, but in the future transported on autonomous semi-AI controled ground vehicles forward deployed alongside conventional larger static air defense and the rest of the conventional AA mobile systems.. I could easily imagine a fleets of autonomous AFV's tracked and wheeled but designed for speed and mobility, always in shoot-and-scoot mode infront of the conventional manned mobile AA systems..

    • @sungukyun2608
      @sungukyun2608 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Why have cheap platforms when the missiles themselves cost more than it?

    • @R.Sole88109
      @R.Sole88109 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@sungukyun2608
      I'd say cos of counter battery fire.
      You'd be losing just expensive missile instead expensive missiles and carrier.

    • @R.Sole88109
      @R.Sole88109 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sungukyun2608
      By CBF I don't necessarily mean artillery giving the frankenSAM a stonk. It could be a drone knocking it out.
      But less spent on the carrier means more on the targeting kit etc.
      The Stinger missile itself has an outward targeting range of up to 4,800 m (15,700 feet) and can engage low-altitude enemy threats at up to 3,800m (12,500 feet)
      Ukraine shot down a Russian kamikaze drone on Wednesday using an improvised “FrankenSAM” air defense system.
      The system downed the Shahed drone from 9000 meters (5.6 miles), registering its first kill, Ukrainian Minister Of Strategic Industries Oleksandr Kamyshin said.

    • @sungukyun2608
      @sungukyun2608 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@R.Sole88109 The radar and targeting systems are more expensive than the missiles, there is no such thing as a cheap carrier for these things.

  • @dimitryrostov6482
    @dimitryrostov6482 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Make a video of the BUK frankensam

  • @LeisaKoski
    @LeisaKoski 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Looks like Ukraine has taken "Franken-SAM" to a whole new level! I wonder if it comes with a lightning bolt generator too. ⚡️😄

  • @rowanyuh6326
    @rowanyuh6326 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Better than a strela 🔥

  • @tomsmith2209
    @tomsmith2209 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder if they've caught anything bigger and more expensive than drones?

    • @Vlad__b1401
      @Vlad__b1401 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      5 fighter jets in three days

    • @tomsmith2209
      @tomsmith2209 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Vlad__b1401 Those have been attributed to patriot systems.

  • @simonschneider5913
    @simonschneider5913 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    is it fair to say that "technicals" is now a thing in europe? :) last time was inn the balkans. i love those pieces of tech cooked up in the field! sadly, its born out of deadly necessities brought about by greedy people without a single good idea in their head. the world is a crazy place.

  • @cesaravegah3787
    @cesaravegah3787 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is stupid until it works, if it works is not stupid.

  • @xzxzt4
    @xzxzt4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LOOKS LIKE A DECOY

  • @ronaldfreitag
    @ronaldfreitag 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I must also say if others are going to comment PLEASE try to make sense. Some comments are so rediculously cryptic its hard to take ANYONE seriously if I can't tell what the f#*k your saying, pretty simple concept I find!

  • @ChrisCoombes
    @ChrisCoombes 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If only these could be launched handheld like Stingers.

    • @commando552
      @commando552 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I imagine that being 3 meters long, weighing 90kg, and not soft launching doesn't help with being shoulder launched.

    • @ChrisCoombes
      @ChrisCoombes 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@commando552 absolutely

  • @jonbroadsword7572
    @jonbroadsword7572 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "FOX THREE!!!"

  • @Alastair_Adana
    @Alastair_Adana 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Drone “screen” is useless. Does not matter if it takes 1 drone or 100 drones to take out the truck when the missiles cost millions

    • @donwyoming1936
      @donwyoming1936 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Worrying about cost is a fool's errand. NATO can easily afford to use million dollar missiles to shoot down low cost weapons like drones.

    • @tessjuel
      @tessjuel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It's not that bad. An ASRAAM missile costs less than 300,000 USD, an AMRAAM 472,000 USD. Still expensive, yes, but we're not talking millions.
      Still, it may be a good idea to send Ukraine more Sidewinders. They cost more than ASRAAM on paper but several countries have a surplus of them and they are gradually being replaced by ASRAAM so the actual cost shouldn't be anywhere as high.

    • @beefmaster3196
      @beefmaster3196 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dead crew can't get new vehicles

    • @baneofbanes
      @baneofbanes 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yah the cost of the missiles isn’t what they’re concerned with. A couple million dollar missile taking out a drone and in doing so protecting a building or other infrastructure with dozens of not hundreds of millions of dollars is worth it.

    • @flamingsmore5904
      @flamingsmore5904 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      These missiles were due to be removed from British army service soon anyway, as they were too old and were being replaced with newer ones. Better they be used here, then paying a bunch to have the missiles disposed off.

  • @ronaldfreitag
    @ronaldfreitag 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've watched a few of this guys videos and can honestly say I don't enjoy them, he's clearly not a military guy and even if he is id have to say the guy is pretty un informed.

  • @Nauda999
    @Nauda999 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Where are Ukraine's F-16s, or F-18s or F-22s or F-35s or B-2s? or B-21s?
    Some have seen Ukraine's Leopard 2s and Abram M1A1s.
    What about Ukraine's Tomahawk or super carriers?

    • @ameerhamid89
      @ameerhamid89 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What the fuck is this comment

  • @ergunaytuver6117
    @ergunaytuver6117 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1 like

  • @octowuss1888
    @octowuss1888 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A drop in the ocean mate, drop in the ocean,

    • @JohnyG29
      @JohnyG29 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stupidest comment of the day.

    • @chriswerb7482
      @chriswerb7482 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      No, Russian planes usually drop on land leaving nasty greasy black smudges. Only rarely do they end up as fish hotels.