Nature becomes logical often in retrospect. Before that, we call it a phenomenon. To be a good scientist requires challenging your own logic in the pursuit of a better explanation.
Neil is both correct and terribly wrong. All phenomenon is 100% logical once you understand them more. Example. First person who had their air blocked choked. This means air is important. Second person who did not have their air blocked still choked... this is not logical compared to the conclusion in the first example. However... for those that understand... it's not air itself that is necessary but something in the air called "oxygen" and that is 100% logical once you understand the difference.
Nature becomes logical often in retrospect. Before that, we call it a phenomenon. To be a good scientist requires challenging your own logic in the pursuit of a better explanation.
Everything is called phenomenon... it's just a general term. The most basic definition of it is literally "an occurrence".
There’s a difference between logical and intuitive,
Neil is both correct and terribly wrong. All phenomenon is 100% logical once you understand them more.
Example. First person who had their air blocked choked. This means air is important.
Second person who did not have their air blocked still choked... this is not logical compared to the conclusion in the first example. However... for those that understand... it's not air itself that is necessary but something in the air called "oxygen" and that is 100% logical once you understand the difference.
This is why Neil isn't at the forefront of science.