Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains Science Without Logic.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @roberthermosillo5727
    @roberthermosillo5727 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +4

    Nature becomes logical often in retrospect. Before that, we call it a phenomenon. To be a good scientist requires challenging your own logic in the pursuit of a better explanation.

    • @CD-vb9fi
      @CD-vb9fi 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Everything is called phenomenon... it's just a general term. The most basic definition of it is literally "an occurrence".

  • @stevenlester985
    @stevenlester985 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +3

    There’s a difference between logical and intuitive,

  • @CD-vb9fi
    @CD-vb9fi 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Neil is both correct and terribly wrong. All phenomenon is 100% logical once you understand them more.
    Example. First person who had their air blocked choked. This means air is important.
    Second person who did not have their air blocked still choked... this is not logical compared to the conclusion in the first example. However... for those that understand... it's not air itself that is necessary but something in the air called "oxygen" and that is 100% logical once you understand the difference.

  • @norbis3939
    @norbis3939 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    This is why Neil isn't at the forefront of science.